Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Operator Ordering in the Relativistic Quantization: Specific Heat in the Rindler Frame

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A covariant quantization that tracks operator ordering predicts that the specific heat of a Boltzmann gas in the Rindler frame departs from $N k_B$ in a way that depends on the ordering parameter $\gamma$.

desk verdict The specific-heat predictions are built on a flawed Airy matrix-element calculation and an inappropriate boundary condition; the formal Hamiltonian is interesting but the thermodynamic claim does not hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17362 v2 pith:6HK2MZC7 submitted 2025-06-20 gr-qc quant-ph

Karol Sajnok , Kacper Dębski This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcquant-ph
keywords operatororderingRindlerspacetimespecificheatAiryfunctionsrelativisticcanonicalquantizationTolman-EhrenfestrelationBoltzmanngasquantumthermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a covariant canonical quantization procedure that keeps track of operator-ordering ambiguities, with a temporal ordering parameter $\gamma$ and a spatial ordering parameter $\alpha$, and applies it to a Boltzmann gas in a uniformly accelerated (Rindler) frame. The semiclassical partition function hides the ordering effects entirely, giving the trivial specific heat $C_V = N k_B$ for every ordering; the paper's claim is that a perturbative quantum treatment built on Airy-function modes produces first- and second-order energy shifts, with the second-order shift depending on $\gamma$, and that including these shifts in the partition function yields ordering-dependent corrections to the specific heat. Numerically, for electrons at laser-accelerator-scale accelerations and for ultra-light particles near strong gravitational sources, the corrections are largest at intermediate temperatures, and the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation further modulates the heat-capacity profile. The payoff the authors are aiming at is that precision calorimetry in accelerated or analogue-gravity setups could probe quantum operator-ordering effects in a relativistic regime.

What carries the argument

The working machinery is a perturbed linear-potential quantum system in one dimension, carried by the Airy-function ladder. The unperturbed Hamiltonian $\hat H_0 = mc^2 + \hat p^2/2m + mg\hat x$ has eigenfunctions $\psi_n(x) = L^{-1/2}\mathrm{Ai}(x/L - a_n)$ with characteristic length $L = (\hbar^2/2m^2g)^{1/3}$, and this discrete ladder supplies the baseline spectrum for the entire thermodynamic calculation. Two ordering parameters enter the construction: $\gamma$, controlling the ordering of the temporal metric factor, survives into the second-order energy shift and therefore into the specific heat; $\alpha$, controlling the spatial metric ordering, drops out of the first-order Rindler Hamiltonian because the spatial metric component is constant in Rindler coordinates. The perturbative matrix elements of $\hat x\hat p^2$ and $\hat p$ are evaluated in the Airy basis using integral representations of Airy functions, reducing them to derivatives of Dirac deltas and then to Kronecker-delta approximations; the resulting closed sums define $E_n^{(1)}$ and $E_n^{(2)}$. The partition-function formula then converts this spectrum into $C_V$, and the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation $T(x)\sqrt{g_{00}(x)} = \Theta_{\rm hb}$ turns distance from the heat bath into a temperature scan.

What would settle it

Measure the heat capacity of a Boltzmann gas of electrons under uniform acceleration around $a \approx 2\times 10^{21}\,\mathrm{m/s^2}$ at intermediate temperatures and compare $C_V/N$ with the prediction of Eq. (20); if the curve stays flat at $Nk_B$ across the predicted peak region, the ordering-dependent correction is falsified. A complementary check is analytic: solve the same Hamiltonian on the physical domain $x \in (-c^2/g, \infty)$ with a boundary condition at the horizon and determine whether the discrete Airy spectrum survives; if it does not, the energy shifts of Eqs. (18)-(19) cannot be the leading quantum corrections.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that operator ordering survives into relativistic quantum thermodynamics rather than being washed out by the semiclassical limit. Starting from the invariant-mass relation, the authors construct a Hermitian Hamiltonian for a particle with internal and radial external degrees of freedom, parameterized by ordering choices; in Rindler spacetime and the low-energy limit this reduces to $\hat H = mc^2(1+g\hat x/c^2)(1+\hat p^2/2m^2c^2) - i\gamma \hbar g\hat p/mc^2$. The unperturbed linear-gravity Hamiltonian has Airy-function eigenstates with energies $E_n^{(0)} = mc^2 + a_n mgL$, where $a_n$ are zeros of the Airy function and $L = (\hbar^2/2m^2g)^{1/3}$. First-order perturbation theory shifts these levels without involving $\gamma$, but the second-order correction $E_n^{(2)}$ is a sum over Airy matrix elements weighted by $(a_n(1-\gamma)+\gamma a_k)$, so the ordering parameter enters the spectrum. Feeding $E_n = E_n^{(0)}+E_n^{(1)}+E_n^{(2)}$ into the canonical partition function $Z=\sum_n e^{-\beta E_n}$ and differentiating according to the specific-heat formula gives $C_V/N$ that departs from $k_B$ and depends on $\gamma$, with a peak-dip-plateau profile in temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation assumes the unperturbed particle is confined to a half-line with an infinite wall at $x=0$, which is what produces the discrete Airy energy ladder; the Rindler frame's actual boundary is the horizon at $x=-c^2/g$, and on that half-line a purely linear potential has no such discrete bound states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measured departure from $C_V = N k_B$ in an accelerated Boltzmann gas would be a direct, calorimetric signature of quantum operator ordering in a relativistic setting.
  • The location and height of the specific-heat maximum would constrain the full ordering parameter $\gamma$, including its imaginary part, so a single $C_V(T)$ curve could distinguish Weyl ordering from other covariant orderings.
  • Imposing Tolman-Ehrenfest equilibrium makes the ordering corrections grow with distance from the heat bath, so the same apparatus can scan a spatial profile rather than only a temperature axis.
  • For ultra-light particles in strong gravitational fields the same corrections appear but at a much reduced scale, giving a concrete target for astrophysical observations.
  • Applying the same Hamiltonian expansion to non-Rindler metrics such as Schwarzschild would bring the spatial ordering parameter $\alpha$ into the observable specific heat, providing a second independent probe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because $\gamma$ enters $E_n^{(2)}$ through a squared modulus, a measurement of the full $C_V(T)$ curve fixes both real and imaginary parts of $\gamma$ from one dataset, without needing a separate phase-sensitive experiment.
  • Editorial inference: an analogue-gravity route suggests itself: ultracold atoms in optical-lattice accelerators, where effective linear potentials are routine, could display the same ordering-dependent heat-capacity deviations at accelerations near $10^5\,\mathrm{m/s^2}$, much lower than laser-plasma values.
  • Editorial inference: the Tolman-Ehrenfest spatial scan is self-calibrating, because the relation fixes the $x$-dependence of the local temperature; the predicted shape of $C_V(x)$ could be tested without precise absolute thermometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a covariant canonical quantization of a relativistic particle in a curved background, tracking operator-ordering ambiguities through two parameters, α (spatial) and γ (temporal). After deriving a Hermitian Hamiltonian with leading relativistic corrections, the authors specialize to the Rindler frame, compute the semiclassical specific heat (finding CV = NkB), and then perform perturbation theory on an Airy-function basis to obtain first- and second-order energy shifts. These shifts are inserted into the canonical partition function to produce ordering-dependent specific-heat curves, which are evaluated numerically for electrons in laser-acceleration regimes, ultra-light particles near black-hole horizons, and with Tolman–Ehrenfest temperature variation. The central claim is that precision calorimetry could probe operator-ordering effects in relativistic regimes.

Significance. The combination of operator-ordering ambiguities with thermodynamics in a Rindler frame is, in principle, an interesting and timely topic, and the semiclassical calculation yielding CV = NkB is a useful consistency check. The paper is also transparent about its truncations and makes its data openly available, which is commendable. However, the central perturbative calculation is not sound: the unperturbed Airy ladder does not correspond to the Rindler wedge boundary, and the matrix elements that feed every energy shift and every plotted curve are derived through an invalid distributional manipulation that is quantitatively contradicted by the virial theorem. As a result, the claimed ordering-dependent specific-heat corrections and the associated experimental prospects are not supported by the presented derivation. If corrected by a complete recomputation, the framework could make a meaningful contribution, but the current manuscript does not establish its main result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (17); Appendix C, Eq. (C4)] The unperturbed spectrum is taken to be the discrete Airy ladder E_n^(0) = mc^2 + a_n mgL with wavefunctions L^(-1/2) Ai(x/L - a_n), which requires a hard wall at x = 0. The right Rindler wedge, however, is x > -c^2/g, and its lower boundary is the horizon at x = -c^2/g, not the reference hyperbola x = 0. A linear potential on the half-line x > -c^2/g without a wall has no discrete Airy bound states, and with a wall placed at the horizon the eigenfunctions and zeros are shifted by the horizon coordinate. Since every perturbative energy shift and the entire specific-heat curve is built on this ladder, the calculation does not describe the Rindler frame as set up in Sec. IV. The integration in Eq. (C10), which runs from -infinity to +infinity, is also inconsistent with a half-line basis.
  2. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C15)-(C16)] The derivation of the matrix elements is mathematically invalid. Starting from Eq. (C14), the evaluation replaces integrals against the continuous variable a_n - a_k by derivatives of delta(a_n - a_k), which vanish for k != n by support, but the true overlaps <k|xi|n> are non-zero for many k != n. The subsequent finite-difference replacement is a heuristic with no controlled error, and it is quantitatively wrong on the diagonal: for the Airy bouncer the virial theorem gives <n|xi|n> = (2/3) a_n, while Eq. (C15) gives a_n - 2/(a_{n+1} - a_n)^2 ~ (1 - 2/pi^2) a_n ~ 0.797 a_n; similarly Eq. (C16) gives a diagonal value near 1.47 a_n^2 instead of the exact (8/15) a_n^2. Because E_n^(1) in Eq. (18) and E_n^(2) in Eq. (19) are built from these matrix elements, the ordering-dependent specific-heat curves in Fig. 2 do not follow from the presented calculation.
  3. [Sec. V, Fig. 2; Eq. (19)] The numerical claim that ordering-dependent corrections are significant is controlled by the arbitrary imaginary part Im gamma. The paper does not determine gamma from any physical principle or measurement; the green curves in Fig. 2 are generated by choosing an input value of Im gamma. The central output is therefore a family of curves parameterized by the very quantity the framework is supposed to constrain, and the abstract's phrasing that the corrections could be measured is not backed by a falsifiable prediction unless a procedure for extracting gamma is supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (9) vs. Eq. (A9)] The coefficient of the linear-in-momentum term contains gamma^* in Eq. (9) but gamma in Eq. (A9); please reconcile the conjugation convention, since this affects the Hermiticity statement.
  2. [Appendix C, first paragraph] The text contains an empty citation placeholder after 'Airy functions' (appearing as '[]'); please supply the intended reference or references.
  3. [Throughout] The notation H_0 is used both for the rest/internal Hamiltonian in Sec. III and for the unperturbed Rindler Hamiltonian in Eq. (C1); this collision should be resolved to avoid confusion.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'amibiguity', 'faciliting', 'straighforwardly', and 'an a approach'; a careful copyedit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ordering parameter gamma is an openly studied input of the model, not a fitted prediction, and the specific-heat curves are computed from the stated Hamiltonian.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no load-bearing circular step. The ordering parameter gamma is introduced in Eqs. (5) and (13) as a free parameter of the quantization map; it is not fitted to any subset of the specific-heat data. The energy shifts E_n^(1) and E_n^(2) follow from standard perturbation theory applied to the stated Hamiltonian, and the specific heat is computed from the canonical partition function built from those energies. The paper openly treats the gamma-dependence as a sensitivity study: 'By varying the imaginary part of the ordering parameter gamma, we can systematically examine the sensitivity of specific heat to different operator orderings.' The only self-citations are contextual: the Hamiltonian is re-derived in Appendix A rather than imported wholesale, and no uniqueness theorem or external result is used to forbid alternative orderings. The resemblance of the peak-dip-plateau structure to Ref. [67] is a qualitative comparison, not an input. Concerns about the Airy finite-difference matrix elements or the boundary condition are correctness issues, not circularity; they do not make the prediction equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation imports a free operator-ordering parameter γ and an ad hoc discrete Airy boundary condition. The parameterization of the Hamiltonian is the authors' own, and the numerical predictions are controlled by an undetermined imaginary part of γ plus an unjustified finite-difference approximation for Airy matrix elements.

free parameters (2)
  • γ (temporal operator-ordering parameter) = Re γ = 1/2; Im γ treated as free and varied in Sec. V
    The derived Hamiltonian and the second-order energy shift depend on γ; the numerical specific-heat plots are parameterized by Imγ.
  • α (spatial operator-ordering parameter) = not fixed; drops out of the Rindler application because g'_rr = 0
    Appears in the general Hamiltonian (Eq. 9) but is not constrained or used in the numerical analysis.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Canonical commutation relation [x̂, p̂] = iħ
    Used throughout to commute operators in Secs. II-III and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption Diagonal metric with only radial position and momentum operators nonzero
    Introduced in Sec. II; restricts the derivation to spherically symmetric, radial cases.
  • domain assumption Small expansion parameters: x̂/r << 1 and c² g_rr p̂²/H0² << 1
    Used to truncate the Taylor series in deriving Eq. (9).
  • domain assumption No back-reaction of the quantum state on the metric
    Stated in Sec. II; the metric is a fixed background.
  • ad hoc to paper Unperturbed Rindler Hamiltonian has a discrete Airy-zero spectrum with a boundary at x=0
    The Rindler wedge is x > -c²/g; a discrete Airy ladder requires a reflecting wall at x=0, which is not the horizon and is not derived. Enters in Sec. IV and Appendix C.
  • ad hoc to paper Airy matrix elements on the full line may be approximated by derivatives of δ, then replaced by finite differences
    Appendix C Eqs. (C14)-(C16) use a full-line integral and a discrete stencil without error bounds.
  • domain assumption Boltzmann statistics apply (temperature above critical temperature)
    Stated in Sec. II and used for the canonical partition function.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operator Ordering in the Relativistic Quantization: Specific Heat in the Rindler Frame." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6HK2MZC7

@misc{pith2026250617362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operator Ordering in the Relativistic Quantization: Specific Heat in the Rindler Frame},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6HK2MZC7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17362}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a covariant canonical quantization for a particle in curved spacetime that tracks operator-ordering ambiguities. Parameterizing spatial and temporal ordering, we derive a Hermitian Hamiltonian with leading quantum-relativistic corrections. In a uniformly accelerated frame, we show the semiclassical heat-capacity approximation misses these effects and then develop a perturbative quantum treatment using Airy-function modes to obtain analytical first- and second-order energy shifts. Including these shifts in the partition function yields nontrivial, ordering-dependent specific-heat corrections. Numerical studies for electrons in extreme electric fields and ultra-light particles in strong gravitational fields demonstrate that these corrections become significant at intermediate temperatures. Enforcing the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation for spatial temperature variation further modulates the heat-capacity profile. Our results suggest that precision calorimetry in laser-acceleration or analogue gravity setups could probe quantum-ordering effects in relativistic regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17362 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The right Rindler wedge is depicted, with the red curve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Specific heat per particle for three scenarios, panels (a)–(c): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Transforming the Rest Energy: The rest energy of the parti- cle is transformed into a rest quantum Hamiltonian ˆH0. This Hamiltonian may describe internal degrees of freedom (such as a two-level system) or provide a more physically accurate representation of the mass term, e.g., a boson field in a cavity

    work page

  2. [2]

    In this model, the internal and external quantum degrees of freedom are decou- pled, meaning ˆxi and ˆpi commute with ˆH0

    Introducing Quantum Operators: Quantum position ˆxi and momentum ˆpi operators are introduced. In this model, the internal and external quantum degrees of freedom are decou- pled, meaning ˆxi and ˆpi commute with ˆH0

    work page

  3. [3]

    Subsequently, the metric tensor and square roots are expanded in a Taylor series to obtain the leading-order corrections to the Hamiltonian

    Assuming Higher-Order Corrections are Negligible: Higher- order corrections beyond second order in ˆp and first order in ˆx are assumed to be much smaller than the internal Hamiltonian. Subsequently, the metric tensor and square roots are expanded in a Taylor series to obtain the leading-order corrections to the Hamiltonian. In this framework, the back-re...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell , V ol

    A. Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell , V ol. 7 (Princeton university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Kostant, Lect

    B. Kostant, Lect. Notes in Math. 170, 87 (1970)

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    M. E. Peskin, An introduction to quantum field theory (CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    R. P. Feynman, QED: The strange theory of light and matter (Princeton University Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Feynman, Feynman lectures on gravitation (CRC press, 2018)

    R. Feynman, Feynman lectures on gravitation (CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Bi ˇcák, and B. G. Schmidt, Physical Review D 55, 669 (1997)

    1997

  2. [10]

    Ashtekar, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1800 (2014)

    A. Ashtekar, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1800 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    N. M. J. Woodhouse, Geometric quantization (Oxford univer- sity press, 1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    A. A. Kirillov, in Dynamical Systems IV: Symplectic Geometry and its Applications (Springer, 2001) pp. 139–176

    2001

  5. [13]

    Ashtekar, Physical Review Letters 46, 573 (1981)

    A. Ashtekar, Physical Review Letters 46, 573 (1981)

    1981

  6. [14]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 042001 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Rovelli, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 114005 (2011)

    C. Rovelli, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 114005 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    H. S. Snyder, Physical Review 71, 38 (1947)

    1947

  9. [17]

    Kontsevich, Letters in Mathematical Physics66, 157 (2003)

    M. Kontsevich, Letters in Mathematical Physics66, 157 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    Rovelli, Living reviews in relativity 11, 1 (2008)

    C. Rovelli, Living reviews in relativity 11, 1 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Kempf, G

    A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, Physical Review D 52, 1108 (1995)

    1995

  12. [20]

    N. A. Shah, A. Shaikh, Y . Yamin, P. Sahoo, A. Bhat, S. A. Lone, M. Faizal, and M. Ahsan, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12572 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String theory and 7 M-theory: A modern introduction (Cambridge university press, 2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Zwiebach, A first course in string theory(Cambridge univer- sity press, 2004)

    B. Zwiebach, A first course in string theory(Cambridge univer- sity press, 2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    Heisenberg, Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172 (1927)

    W. Heisenberg, Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172 (1927)

    1927

  16. [24]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The principles of quantum mechanics, 27 (Ox- ford university press, 1981)

    1981

  17. [25]

    Ashtekar and R

    A. Ashtekar and R. S. Tate, Journal of Mathematical Physics 35, 6434 (1994)

    1994

  18. [26]

    Masłowski, A

    T. Masłowski, A. Nowicki, and V . M. Tkachuk, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45, 075309 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    J. E. Moyal, in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , V ol. 45 (Cambridge University Press,

  20. [28]

    Sternheimer, in AIP Conference Proceedings , V ol

    D. Sternheimer, in AIP Conference Proceedings , V ol. 453 (American Institute of Physics, 1998) pp. 107–145

    1998

  21. [29]

    Weyl, Zeitschrift für Physik 46, 1 (1927)

    H. Weyl, Zeitschrift für Physik 46, 1 (1927)

    1927

  22. [30]

    B. S. DeWitt, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 377 (1957)

    1957

  23. [31]

    H. J. Groenewold, On the principles of elementary quantum me- chanics (Springer, 1946)

    1946

  24. [32]

    S. T. Ali and M. Engliš, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 17, 391 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Wigner, Physical review 40, 749 (1932)

    E. Wigner, Physical review 40, 749 (1932)

    1932

  26. [34]

    Kafri, J

    D. Kafri, J. M. Taylor, and G. J. Milburn, New Journal of Physics 16, 065020 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Peres and D

    A. Peres and D. R. Terno, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 93 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Weiss, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter (1978)

    U. Weiss, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter (1978)

    1978

  29. [37]

    N. H. McCoy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 18, 674 (1932)

    1932

  30. [38]

    Oppenheim, Physical Review X 13, 041040 (2023)

    J. Oppenheim, Physical Review X 13, 041040 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    C. G. Van Weert, Annals of Physics 140, 133 (1982)

    1982

  32. [40]

    V . P. Frolov and A. I. Zel’nikov, Physical Review D 35, 3031 (1987)

    1987

  33. [41]

    Altamirano, P

    N. Altamirano, P. Corona-Ugalde, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Classical and Quantum Gravity 35, 145005 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Becattini and E

    F. Becattini and E. Grossi, Physical Review D 92, 045037 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    D. N. Zubarev, A. V . Prozorkevich, and S. A. Smolyansky, Teo- reticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika 40, 394 (1979)

    1979

  36. [44]

    Paczos, K

    J. Paczos, K. D˛ ebski, P. T. Grochowski, A. R. Smith, and A. Dragan, Quantum 8, 1338 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Cepollaro, F

    C. Cepollaro, F. Giacomini, and M. G. Paris, Quantum 7, 946 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, and ˇC. Brukner, Nature commu- nications 2, 505 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Nature Physics 11, 668 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, New Journal of Physics 19, 025011 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Zych, Quantum systems under gravitational time dilation (Springer, 2017)

    M. Zych, Quantum systems under gravitational time dilation (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, and G. Mil- burn, Physical review letters 119, 240401 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Roura, C

    A. Roura, C. Schubert, D. Schlippert, and E. M. Rasel, Physical Review D 104, 084001 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    A. R. Smith and M. Ahmadi, Nature communications 11, 5360 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    D˛ ebski, P

    K. D˛ ebski, P. T. Grochowski, R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´nski, and A. Dragan, Classical and Quantum Gravity 41, 135014 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Tobar, S

    G. Tobar, S. K. Manikandan, T. Beitel, and I. Pikovski, Nature Communications 15, 7229 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Suzuki, A

    T. Suzuki, A. Hirshfeld, and H. Leschke, Progress of Theoreti- cal Physics 63, 287 (1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V . Vedral, Physical review letters119, 240402 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Martín-Martínez and T

    E. Martín-Martínez and T. R. Perche, Physical Review D 108, L101702 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    and D˛ ebski et al. [59], this work formulates a relativistically in- variant quantum Hamiltonian, rigorously resolves the ordering prob- lem and enables the calculation of the specific heat of a quantum bosonic gas in Rindler coordinates. The foundation of our study rests on ...

  51. [59]

    R. T. Perche and E. Martín-Martínez, Physical Review A 107, 042612 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Assum- ing that the mixed space-time components of the metric vanish and performing subsequent algebraic manipulations, the energy expres- sion becomes: E =√g00 p m2c4−c2gijpipj

    proper mass of a particle with classical momentumpµ in a grav- itational background described by the metricgµν: mc2 = p c2gµνpµpν, (3) wherem represents the proper mass andc the speed of light. Assum- ing that the mixed space-time components of the metric vanish and performing...

  53. [61]

    Christodoulakis and J

    T. Christodoulakis and J. Zanelli, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-

    1971

  54. [62]

    Anderson, Annalen der Physik 524, 757 (2012)

    E. Anderson, Annalen der Physik 524, 757 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    Khandelwal, M

    S. Khandelwal, M. P. Lock, and M. P. Woods, Quantum 4, 309 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    D˛ ebski, P

    K. D˛ ebski, P. T. Grochowski, R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, and A. Dragan, Classical and Quantum Gravity (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 844 (1915)

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 844 (1915)

    1915

  58. [66]

    Marto, Universe 7, 297 (2021)

    J. Marto, Universe 7, 297 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    R. C. Tolman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 14, 701 (1928)

    1928

  60. [68]

    R. C. Tolman and P. Ehrenfest, Physical Review 36, 1791 (1930)

    1930

  61. [69]

    Vallée and M

    O. Vallée and M. Soares, Airy functions and applications to physics (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    Bieniek, Physical Review A 15, 1513 (1977)

    R. Bieniek, Physical Review A 15, 1513 (1977)

    1977

  63. [71]

    Tong, Statistical physics, University of Cambridge (2012)

    D. Tong, Statistical physics, University of Cambridge (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    T. I. Rouabhia, A. Boumali, and H. Hassanabadi, Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 20, 112 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    Deppner, W

    C. Deppner, W. Herr, M. Cornelius, P. Stromberger, T. Sternke, C. Grzeschik, A. Grote, J. Rudolph, S. Herrmann, M. Krutzik, et al., Physical Review Letters 127, 100401 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Pandey, H

    S. Pandey, H. Mas, G. Drougakis, P. Thekkeppatt, V . Bolpasi, G. Vasilakis, K. Poulios, and W. von Klitzing, Nature 570, 205 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Wu and Q

    B. Wu and Q. Niu, New journal of Physics 5, 104 (2003)

    2003

  68. [76]

    Choi and Q

    D.-I. Choi and Q. Niu, Physical Review Letters 82, 2022 (1999)

    1999

  69. [77]

    Burger, F

    S. Burger, F. S. Cataliotti, C. Fort, F. Minardi, M. Inguscio, M. L. Chiofalo, and M. Tosi, Physical Review Letters 86, 4447 (2001)

    2001

  70. [78]

    R. W. Newsome and E. Y . Andrei, Review of scientific instru- ments 75, 104 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    Pötting, M

    S. Pötting, M. Cramer, C. H. Schwalb, H. Pu, and P. Meystre, Physical Review A 64, 023604 (2001)

    2001

  72. [80]

    E. W. Collings, Applied Superconductivity, Metallurgy, and Physics of Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals Alloy Superconduc- tors: Their Metallurgical, Physical, and Magnetic-Mixed-State Properties , 307 (1986)

    1986

  73. [81]

    Sajnok, Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.16384540 (2025)

    K. Sajnok, Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.16384540 (2025). Appendix A: Relativistic Quantization Procedure Let us consider the classical kinetic component of the Eq.(4): Ep = p m2c4−c2gijpipj, (A1) that we aim to quantize. For simplicity, let’s assume that the parti- cle’s momentum and...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.