Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Localized Towers on the Composite Magnetic Monopole and the Weak Gravity Conjecture$=$Distance Conjecture Connection in Effective Field Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the light tower predicted by the distance conjecture can be realised by localised excitations of a composite magnetic monopole, not only by propagating four-dimensional states.

desk verdict A clean toy calculation of the CMM excitation spectrum, honestly presented, but the claimed agreement with the distance conjecture is mostly built into a free power-law ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17432 v3 pith:OUGYCNIB submitted 2025-06-20 hep-th

Moreshwar Pathak , Kazuyuki Furuuchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords weakgravityconjecturedistancecompositemagneticmonopolelocalizedtowerswamplandeffectivefieldtheorygaugesymmetrybreakingemergentstring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a U(1)×U(1) gauge theory spontaneously broken to U(1), where the low-energy magnetic monopole is a composite object: Z monopoles of the broken U(1) and one anti-monopole of the other U(1), tied together by flux tubes. It asks whether the weak-gravity–distance conjecture connection survives at low energies, and finds that the composite monopole's rotational and oscillatory excitations have energies $\sim Z^{-6}$ and $\sim Z^{-7/4}$ in the large-$Z$ limit, so they form a tower that becomes light as $Z\to\infty$. Because these excitations are localised on the monopole, the authors propose extending the distance conjecture to include a tower of localised low-energy states, not just propagating four-dimensional states. If right, swampland constraints can propagate to low scales through monopole degrees of freedom, and the breakdown of one EFT can be repaired by another EFT in the same spacetime dimension.

What carries the argument

Composite magnetic monopole (CMM): the Dirac monopole of the unbroken U(1) gauge group, built from Z magnetic monopoles of one U(1) factor and one anti-monopole of the other, joined by Nielsen–Olesen flux tubes. Its size $L_m = \sqrt{Z}/(ev)$ is fixed by balancing flux-tube tension against magnetic repulsion. The argument runs on two simple mechanical Hamiltonians for this object: rigid-body rotation with moment of inertia $Z m_B L_m^2$, and radial oscillation in the potential $V(L) = K(L_m^3/L + L L_m)$, with $m_B \sim \Lambda_{\mathrm{UV}}/e^2$. These give the $Z^{-6}$ and $Z^{-7/4}$ scalings that match the extended distance conjecture once the large-$Z$ limit is identified with a moduli-space boundary.

What would settle it

A concrete failure mode would be an explicit UV embedding of this model with large $Z$ in which the composite monopole's localised excitations do not appear, or in which the tower instead consists of string or Kaluza–Klein modes with a different $Z$-dependence. Within the model, deriving the actual function $Z(\varphi)$ and computing $E(Z)$ from first principles would settle whether $\beta'$ is order one and whether the exponential form of the extended DC holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the extended distance conjecture in eq. (2.16): as a scalar field approaches a boundary of moduli space, a tower of states appears whose energy scale decreases as $E \sim E_0 \exp(-\beta' \varphi/M_P)$, with $\beta'$ of order one. In the model studied here, this tower is realised by localised excitations of the composite magnetic monopole, not by propagating 4D states. Concretely, the rotational levels are $E_{\mathrm{rot},j} \sim \frac{(eZ)^4}{2 Z^6} v (v/\Lambda_{\mathrm{UV}}) j(j+1)$ and the oscillatory quanta are $\omega \sim \frac{(eZ)^{3/2}}{Z^{7/4}} (2\pi) v \sqrt{v/\Lambda_{\mathrm{UV}}}$, both vanishing as $Z\to\infty$ at fixed $eZ \lesssim O(1)$. The paper establishes these scalings by modelling the monopole as a rigid body for rotation and as a harmonic oscillator for radial motion, with estimates of flux-tube tension and magnetic Coulomb repulsion, and checks that both approximations hold up to very high excitation levels.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on assuming that the large-$Z$ limit maps to a moduli-space boundary via $m/m_0 \sim Z^{-\beta}$ (or the extended $E/E_0 \sim Z^{-\beta}$), with $\beta$ an unspecified order-one constant; the paper never derives $Z$ from a canonically normalised scalar or fixes $\beta$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the extended distance conjecture is correct, the light tower required above the low-energy cut-off can be bound states localised on a soliton, not a separate 4D particle spectrum.
  • The rotational and oscillatory excitations lie below the low-energy EFT's cut-off $\Lambda_{\mathrm{low}} \sim ev/\sqrt{Z}$, so low-energy fields can excite them without immediately breaking the EFT.
  • The energy hierarchy $E_{\mathrm{rot}}/\omega \sim Z^{-17/4}\sqrt{v/\Lambda_{\mathrm{UV}}}$ implies that very different tower spacings can appear as the same moduli-space boundary is approached.
  • The extended DC is broader than the emergent string conjecture: it allows a new EFT in the same spacetime dimension to take over after the previous one breaks down.
  • The results give a concrete EFT-level route by which swampland constraints propagate from the high-energy weak-gravity bound down to monopole dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If localised towers are generic, the phenomenological reach of the distance conjecture may be wider than usually assumed: the tower can hide inside a heavy soliton rather than appear as new propagating particles.
  • A string-theory embedding of the large-$Z$ model could distinguish the proposal from the emergent string conjecture: if the limit decompactifies first, the localised tower would not appear and the extended DC would fail in that corner.
  • The rotational–oscillatory hierarchy suggests that at moderate $Z$ the first signals of the tower would be rotational, which could be relevant for monopole dynamics in cosmological or astrophysical settings.
  • A natural next calculation is the CMM spectrum with a more realistic spherical-shell charge distribution, which would sharpen the $Z$-scaling predictions and make them testable against UV completions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the composite magnetic monopole (CMM) in the U(1)_A x U(1)_B Saraswat EFT spontaneously broken to U(1)_low, with a Higgs field of charge (Z,1). In the large-Z, small-e limit with eZ fixed, the authors compute the low-energy excitation spectrum of the CMM. They find rotational excitations with E_rot ~ (eZ)^4 Z^{-6} v (v/\Lambda_UV) j(j+1) and oscillatory excitations with \omega ~ (eZ)^{3/2} Z^{-7/4} v sqrt(v/\Lambda_UV), and observe that both energy scales vanish as Z goes to infinity. They then propose an extension of the distance conjecture (DC) in which a tower of states localized on a magnetic monopole, rather than propagating 4D states, appears with energy scale E ~ E_0 exp(-\beta' \phi/M_P) as a modulus approaches a boundary. Using the ansatz E/E_0 ~ Z^{-\beta} with \beta free, the paper concludes that the CMM spectrum is broadly in accord with the mWGC=DC connection.

Significance. The paper contains explicit, reproducible calculations of the CMM excitation spectrum, and it is transparent about its assumptions, including the statement that the Saraswat EFT cannot by itself prove or disprove swampland conjectures. The proposal to extend the DC to localized towers is interesting and could broaden the applicability of swampland constraints to non-supersymmetric EFTs far below the string scale. However, the central evidence for the claimed accord with the DC is currently weak: the comparison uses a free power-law exponent in Eq. (2.17) and an unproven identification of large Z with a moduli-space boundary. If the extended DC proposal is to be convincing, a derivation or at least a concrete model of the Z-\phi relation is needed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.17)] The claimed accord with the distance conjecture is built into the ansatz rather than tested. Equation (2.17) posits E/E0 ~ Z^{-\beta} with \beta a free positive constant, while the extended DC (2.16) is exponential in a canonically normalized modulus \phi. The calculations in Sec. 2.4 give E_rot ~ Z^{-6} and \omega ~ Z^{-7/4}; since \beta is free, any positive power p can be matched by setting \beta = p, so these exponents do not constitute a quantitative check of the DC. The paper must either derive the relation between Z and \phi (for example, through a string-theory embedding, which is deferred in Sec. 3) or explicitly state that the comparison is only a consistency check with a free exponent, not a test.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.14)] The map between large Z and a boundary of moduli space is an assumption, and it is not a trivial one. Z is an integer charge in U(1)_A, so the family of EFTs labelled by Z is a discrete sequence, whereas the DC applies to a continuous path in the field space of a single UV theory. No continuity argument or construction of a scalar field whose expectation value controls Z is provided. If Z cannot be varied continuously or identified with a modulus, Eq. (2.17) is not a distance-conjecture statement and the central comparison in Sec. 2.4 has no DC content.
  3. [Secs. 2.4.1 and 2.4.2, Eqs. (2.21) and (2.30)] The computed excitation energies are parametrically below the low-energy cutoff \Lambda_low: E_rot ~ \Lambda_low (eZ) Z^{-5/2} (v/\Lambda_UV) and \omega ~ \Lambda_low (eZ)^{1/2} Z^{-1/4} 2\pi sqrt(v/\Lambda_UV). The original mWGC=DC connection identifies the tower scale with the EFT cutoff above which the EFT breaks down, so it is not clear why a tower far below \Lambda_low realizes the DC prediction. The paper's response that the mismatch is absorbed into the free parameter \beta is exactly the circularity noted above. The authors should clarify whether the proposed extended DC is intended to be decoupled from the cutoff scale and, if so, why the localized tower below \Lambda_low is the state predicted by the mWGC=DC connection.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.4, Eqs. (2.18), (2.22), (2.23)] The symbol J2 should be typeset as J^2 in the Hamiltonian and force estimates, and Eq. (2.23) appears to be missing parentheses in the denominator of the first expression.
  2. [Sec. 1, Eq. (1.2)] There is a stray '1' before m_mono in the sentence defining the monopole mass estimate.
  3. [Sec. 3] The model name is misspelled as 'Sawraswat' and 'Sawaswat'; it should be 'Saraswat'.
  4. [References, Ref. [26]] Reference [26] is an unpublished Master's thesis available only upon reasonable request; if it is needed for the quantitative estimates, it should be made publicly available or its relevant content should be summarized in the paper.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The CMM spectrum computation is independent, but the claimed DC accord is built in: eq. (2.17) posits E/E0 ~ Z^{-beta} with beta free and order one, so the computed Z^{-6} and Z^{-7/4} scalings automatically satisfy the ansatz by construction.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2.3, eqs. (2.14), (2.16), (2.17); Sec. 2.4.1, eq. (2.20); Sec. 2.4.2, eq. (2.29); Sec. 3.]
    "In passing, following the extended DC conjecture, we modify (2.14) to E/E0 ∼ Z^{−β}. ... However, from our assumption (2.17), the difference in the powers of Z is translated to the difference of the order one coefficients (β in eq. (2.17)). As the DC does not precisely specify the order one constant, we think this difference is not against the mWGC=DC conjecture."

    Eq. (2.17) is an ansatz with β a free 'positive constant of order one', so it is satisfied by every power-law decrease E ~ Z^{-p} for any positive p. The paper then computes E_rot ~ Z^{-6} and ω ~ Z^{-7/4}, i.e. particular values of p, and declares them 'in accordance' with the prediction. The accord is therefore by construction: the computed exponents merely fix β and cannot test or falsify the ansatz. Moreover, the DC's exponential dependence on a canonical modulus, eq. (1.5), is never derived because Z(φ) is not given; eq. (2.17) replaces the DC form by fiat. The spectrum calculation is genuine, but the claimed WGC=DC check is not independent content.

full rationale

The calculation of the CMM excitation spectrum in Sec. 2.4 is a real EFT computation and is not circular: E_rot and ω follow from the rotational and oscillator Hamiltonians using the stated mass, flux-tube tension, and monopole-size estimates. The mWGC propagation result (2.9) is taken from [20] (co-authored by Furuuchi) and [21], but it is prior external content rather than the target claim, so it does not by itself raise the circularity score. The circularity is in the central 'accord' step. The paper posits eq. (2.17), E/E0 ∼ Z^{-β}, with β a free order-one positive constant, and then finds E_rot ∼ Z^{-6} and ω ∼ Z^{-7/4}. Because β was never fixed, any decreasing power law is a special case of the ansatz; the paper explicitly says the power difference is absorbed into β and 'is not against' the conjecture. The abstract and Sec. 3 also concede that identifying large Z with a moduli-space boundary is an assumption, and the exponential DC form (1.5) is never connected to Z via a derived Z(φ). Those are unproven assumptions rather than circular reductions, but combined with the free-β ansatz they make the claimed agreement content-free. The extended-DC proposal is a conceptual innovation and the spectrum may be of independent interest, but the headline compatibility with the WGC=DC connection is built in by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central computation rests on the Saraswat U(1)xU(1) model and the magnetic WGC mass estimate; the only genuinely new input is the power-law mapping between Z and the DC tower mass (beta), which is assumed rather than derived and makes the agreement with the DC only weakly constraining.

free parameters (2)
  • beta (DC power-law exponent) = unspecified; assumed positive and O(1)
    Introduced in eq. (2.14) and (2.17) to relate the DC tower mass or energy to Z. Because it is free, the computed Z^{-6} and Z^{-7/4} scalings cannot be falsified; any positive exponent satisfies the ansatz.
  • beta prime (extended DC exponent) = unspecified; assumed O(1)
    Appears in the proposed extended DC in eq. (2.16) but is never used in a quantitative comparison; it keeps the conjecture flexible.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Large charge Z limit corresponds to a boundary of moduli space, with m/m0 ~ Z^{-beta}.
    Eq. (2.14); imported by analogy from the Dark Dimension scenario, not derived for this model.
  • domain assumption The constituent monopole mass follows m_B ~ Λ_UV/e^2 from the magnetic WGC estimate.
    Used in eq. (2.19) and based on eq. (1.2) from the WGC literature; it sets the overall scale of the rotor and oscillator energies.
  • domain assumption The CMM is treated as a rigid body for low-j rotational modes, and the size potential is harmonic for the oscillatory modes.
    Justified by the small centrifugal-to-flux ratio in eq. (2.23) and the large critical level n_c in eq. (2.32), but only in the extreme large-Z limit.
  • domain assumption The low-energy EFT cutoff is set by the CMM size: Λ_low ~ 1/L_m.
    Eq. (2.8), taken from [20]; load-bearing for identifying the tower scale with the mWGC bound in the low-energy EFT.
  • standard math Standard quantization rules for rigid rotor j(j+1) and harmonic oscillator energy levels.
    Used in eqs. (2.18) through (2.20) and eq. (2.28) to convert classical estimates into discrete spectra.
invented entities (1)
  • Localized tower of excited states on the CMM
    purpose: Provides the light tower required by the extended distance conjecture without a tower propagating in 4D spacetime; supports the proposed extension of the DC.
    Introduced in Sec. 2.3 and summarized in Sec. 3. There is no independent derivation or observable prediction outside this model; it is a conjecture extension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Localized Towers on the Composite Magnetic Monopole and the Weak Gravity Conjecture$=$Distance Conjecture Connection in Effective Field Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUGYCNIB

@misc{pith2026250617432,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Localized Towers on the Composite Magnetic Monopole and the Weak Gravity Conjecture$=$Distance Conjecture Connection in Effective Field Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUGYCNIB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17432}
}
abstract

We study the energy spectrum of the composite magnetic monopole (CMM) in the model originally constructed in arXiv:1608.06951 to examine how the applicability of the weak gravity conjecture (WGC) propagates to lower energy scales in the effective field theory (EFT) framework. This is motivated by the WGC$=$distance conjecture (DC) connection suggested in the literature. Assuming that the limits of the model parameters correspond to the boundaries of the moduli space in a UV theory, we showed that the parameter dependence of the energy spectrum of the CMM is broadly in accord with the prediction of the WGC$=$DC connection. However, unlike the original DC, the low-energy excitations of the CMM are localized on the CMM. This leads us to propose an extension of the DC to include the localized tower of excited states. We discuss the implications of this extension of the DC to the swampland constraints on EFTs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17432 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The high energy EFT is the original Saraswat EFT. It has the gauge group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic figure of a monopole of U(1)low with unit magnetic charge (the magnetic flux of the unbroken U(1)broken is indicated by B⃗ broken). It consists of one anti￾monopole of U(1)A (indicated by −A) and Z monopoles of U(1)B (indicated by B), connected by the Nielsen-Olesen flux tubes with U(1)broken magnetic flux (indicated by B⃗ broken) [1]. the magnetic monopole of U(1)low as composite magnetic monopole (CMM)… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Internal Structure of the Deconstructed Dirac Monopole

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a deconstructed U(1) gauge theory, the diagonal U(1) Dirac monopole is a flux-tube-bound cluster of N fractionally charged monopoles with size set by the lattice spacing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Weak gravity conjecture and effective field theory,

    P. Saraswat, “Weak gravity conjecture and effective field theory,”Phys. Rev.D95 no. 2, (2017) 025013,arXiv:1608.06951 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    The string landscape and the swampland,

    C. Vafa, “The string landscape and the swampland,”arXiv:hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, “The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,”JHEP06(2007) 060, arXiv:hep-th/0601001

    arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,”Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33,arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,”JHEP02(2022) 190,arXiv:1910.01135 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,”JHEP02(2022) 096,arXiv:1904.06344 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity,

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti, “Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity,”JHEP01(2017) 088,arXiv:1610.00010 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,”JHEP02(2016) 140,arXiv:1509.06374 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions,

    M. Montero, G. Shiu, and P. Soler, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions,”JHEP10(2016) 159,arXiv:1606.08438 [hep-th]. 15

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture,”JHEP08(2017) 025,arXiv:1606.08437 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency,

    S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, “A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency,”Fortsch. Phys.66no. 5, (2018) 1800020, arXiv:1802.04287 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,

    E. Palti, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,”JHEP08(2017) 034, arXiv:1705.04328 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti, and I. Valenzuela, “Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,”JHEP08(2018) 143,arXiv:1802.08264 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP10(2018) 164,arXiv:1808.05958 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,”Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321–350,arXiv:1810.05169 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela, “Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,”JHEP01(2021) 176,arXiv:2004.10768 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review,

    E. Palti, “The Swampland: Introduction and Review,”Fortsch. Phys.67no. 6, (2019) 1900037,arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela, “Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,”Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1–50,arXiv:2102.01111 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, “Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,”arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Weak Gravity Conjecture From Low Energy Observers’ Perspective,

    K. Furuuchi, “Weak Gravity Conjecture From Low Energy Observers’ Perspective,” Fortsch. Phys.66no. 10, (2018) 1800016,arXiv:1712.01302 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 051601,arXiv:1402.2287 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,”Nucl. Phys. B 61(1973) 45–61

    1973

  15. [23]

    Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,

    Y. Nambu, “Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields,”Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 4262. 16

    1974

  16. [24]

    The dark dimension and the Swampland,

    M. Montero, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela, “The dark dimension and the Swampland,”JHEP02(2023) 022,arXiv:2205.12293 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    AdS and the Swampland,

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti, and C. Vafa, “AdS and the Swampland,”Phys. Lett. B797 (2019) 134867,arXiv:1906.05225 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Analysis of energy spectrum of composite magnetic monopoles,

    M. Pathak, “Analysis of energy spectrum of composite magnetic monopoles,” Master’s thesis, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    A. V. Manohar and M. B. Wise,Heavy quark physics, vol. 10. Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, 2000

  20. [28]

    Nonlocality versus complementarity: A Conservative approach to the information problem,

    S. B. Giddings, “Nonlocality versus complementarity: A Conservative approach to the information problem,”Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 025002, arXiv:0911.3395 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Weak Gravity Conjecture, Black Hole Entropy, and Modular Invariance,

    L. Aalsma, A. Cole, and G. Shiu, “Weak Gravity Conjecture, Black Hole Entropy, and Modular Invariance,”JHEP08(2019) 022,arXiv:1905.06956 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Weak gravity conjecture,

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Weak gravity conjecture,” Rev. Mod. Phys.95no. 3, (2023) 035003,arXiv:2201.08380 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Confined monopoles and failure of the Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, N. Pittman, S. Rauch, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Confined monopoles and failure of the Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture,” arXiv:2502.14951 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    New Connections Between String Theories,

    J. Dai, R. G. Leigh, and J. Polchinski, “New Connections Between String Theories,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 2073–2083

    1989

  25. [33]

    Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(1995) 4724–4727,arXiv:hep-th/9510017

    1995 arXiv

  26. [34]

    D-branes, monopoles and Nahm equations,

    D.-E. Diaconescu, “D-branes, monopoles and Nahm equations,”Nucl. Phys. B503 (1997) 220–238,arXiv:hep-th/9608163

    1997 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Milli-Charged Dark Matter in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,

    G. Shiu, P. Soler, and F. Ye, “Milli-Charged Dark Matter in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110no. 24, (2013) 241304,arXiv:1302.5471 [hep-th]. 17

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.