Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Nonequilibrium orders in parametrically driven field theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rapid parametric driving of a dissipative O(N) field theory can reverse the effective damping of long-wavelength modes, driving a transition into a continuous time-crystalline limit-cycle phase.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism for continuous time crystals via parametrically pumped antidamping, but the sign of δγ rests on a sharp-peak ansatz and a prefactor mismatch in the SM needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18622 v2 pith:OLXL3SHY submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.stat-mech

Carl Philipp Zelle , Romain Daviet , Andrew J. Millis , Sebastian Diehl This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords timecrystalsparametricdrivingKeldyshfieldtheorydriven-dissipativesystemsO(N)modelslimitcyclesantiferromagnetsnonequilibriumphasetransitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a fast, symmetry-preserving parametric drive—implemented as an oscillating mass, the generic way a laser couples to an insulator—acts as an effective pump for the slow modes of a dissipative O(N) order-parameter theory. The drive creates a sharply occupied reservoir of high-momentum modes, and nonlinear scattering makes those modes 'rain down' into the long-wavelength sector, contributing an antidamping $\delta\gamma<0$ and a heating term $\Delta D>0$. When the bare damping is small enough, $\gamma_{\rm eff}=\gamma+\delta\gamma$ crosses zero and the steady state becomes a rotating limit cycle: a continuous time crystal whose period is much longer than, and incommensurate with, the drive period. The authors derive the loop corrections analytically, draw the phase diagram, and support the ordered-phase case with lattice simulations. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a generic, symmetry-preserving route to time-crystalline order in pumped magnetic materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is a two-step coarse-graining. Split the field into slow low-momentum modes and fast reservoir modes peaked at momentum $q_\Omega$ with occupation $n(q)\approx \delta(q-q_\Omega)n_b$, then integrate the reservoir out in a leading-order loop expansion of the response-functional path integral equivalent to the Langevin equation. The damping shift is read off from the sunset (two-loop) self-energy diagram, $\delta\gamma=\operatorname{Im}\,\partial_\omega \Sigma^R_p(\omega=0,q=0)$, in which two reservoir correlation functions and one retarded response function meet; the analytic continuation of this sunset integral produces the negative sign. The heating shift $\Delta D$ comes from the same diagram with three reservoir correlation functions. The generated nonlinear damping vertices $u(\tilde\phi\cdot\partial_t\phi)(\phi\cdot\phi)$ and $u'(\tilde\phi\cdot\phi)\partial_t(\phi\cdot\phi)$ carry the stability of the limit cycle, with $u'>u>0$ enforcing rotation rather than amplitude oscillation.

What would settle it

Compute the next-order correction to $\delta\gamma$ for a reservoir of finite width $\delta q$: if the negative sign survives only for $\delta q/q_\Omega$ below a few percent, the mechanism fails for realistic pumps. Experimentally, measure the $q=0$ magnon linewidth versus drive power in a low-damping antiferromagnet; the prediction is that the linewidth shrinks to zero and re-emerges with opposite sign at the onset of the rotating phase, while the rotation frequency rises as the square root of the pump strength above threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that integrating out the fast reservoir created by the drive leaves the low-frequency sector with an effective damping $\gamma_{\rm eff}=\gamma+\delta\gamma$, where $\delta\gamma=-N_\gamma \lambda^2 (q_\Omega n_b)^2<0$, with $n_b$ the reservoir occupation set by pump power and $q_\Omega$ the resonant momentum. For sufficiently small bare $\gamma$, $\gamma_{\rm eff}$ crosses zero and the symmetric (or ordered) state becomes unstable toward a limit cycle in which the order parameter rotates at frequency $\omega_0$ much smaller than the drive frequency; the paper gives the explicit rotating solution for $N=3$. The same reservoir integration generates positive noise $\Delta D\propto \lambda^2 N_D (q_\Omega n_b)^3/\Omega^2$ and nonlinear damping terms $u,u'>0$ with $u'>u$, which stabilize the rotating phase and select rotation over amplitude oscillations. Too strong a drive therefore heats the system back into a paramagnet, giving a finite window of time-crystalline order in the pump-power–temperature plane. The transition from the ordered phase is claimed to occur through a critical exceptional point in the O(3)/antiferromagnetic case and through a noisy Hopf bifurcation for the SO(3)/ferromagnetic precession case.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the ansatz that the pumped reservoir occupation is sharply peaked at a single momentum, $n(q)\approx\delta(q-q_\Omega)n_b$, with a narrow width and a decay rate $\gamma_\Omega$, and on computing only leading-order (one- and two-loop) corrections; if the reservoir is spread in momentum or higher-order loops matter, the claimed antidamping $\delta\gamma<0$ could change sign or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A symmetry-preserving parametric pump is enough to produce continuous time-crystalline order in dissipative bosonic field theories; no explicit symmetry breaking or engineered nonreciprocity is required.
  • The paramagnet-to-time-crystal transition falls into a nonthermal universality class whose correlations violate fluctuation-dissipation relations, while the ordered antiferromagnet case is governed by a critical exceptional point with a dip in the order-parameter amplitude and $\omega_0\propto\sqrt{r_D-r_{D,c}}$.
  • In an SO(3) ferromagnet the induced precession term changes the ordered-side transition into a noisy Hopf bifurcation, described by the same universality class as a driven-dissipative complex order-parameter field.
  • The mechanism transfers to any setting with a high-frequency band nonlinearly coupled to slow modes and to a thermal bath, including the strongly driven Hubbard model, where the numerically seen 'magnon condensation' would be the onset of this time crystal.
  • Very strong drives heat the low-frequency sector through $\Delta D\propto n_b^3$, so time-crystalline order occupies a finite window of pump power and low bath temperature, with a re-entrant paramagnet at high power.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean experimental discriminator would be the scaling $\omega_0\sim\sqrt{\text{pump power}-\text{threshold}}$ together with the amplitude dip at the transition; these features separate the antidamping mechanism from ordinary parametric amplification, which does not produce a self-sustained rotating condensate.
  • Since $\delta\gamma$ grows linearly with $n_b^2$ while heating grows with $n_b^3$, materials with the smallest intrinsic magnetic damping should show the broadest time-crystal window; drive frequency may be most effective slightly off exact resonance where scattering phase space is larger.
  • The same effective-field-theory reduction may apply to driven exciton-polariton or phonon systems in which an optically hot band pumps a slow condensate, even when the drive does not address the condensate mode directly; the key ingredients are nonlinear scattering between fast and slow bands plus a relaxing bath.
  • A test of the leading-order treatment is to measure how the effective linewidth and noise scale separately with pump power: the predicted ratio $\delta\gamma^2/\Delta D \propto n_b$ may acquire corrections at higher occupation, revealing whether the sunset approximation is the whole story.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a field-theoretic framework for parametrically driven dissipative O(N) models. The authors argue that a rapid parametric drive creates a highly occupied high-momentum reservoir; after integrating out these fast modes, the low-frequency sector acquires an effective antidamping δγ<0 and a heating term ΔD>0. When the bare damping γ is sufficiently small, the effective damping γeff=γ+δγ crosses zero, triggering an instability to a time-crystalline limit-cycle phase with a rotating order parameter. The analytic derivation in the Supplemental Material uses a sunset diagram with a sharply peaked reservoir occupation, and numerical simulations of the corresponding Langevin equation in the ordered phase (r<0) show a limit cycle with the predicted amplitude dip and square-root frequency onset. The paper also discusses universality classes, including critical exceptional points and the noisy Hopf bifurcation, and connects the mechanism to pumped magnetic materials.

Significance. If the central antidamping result is correct, this is a significant theoretical contribution: it proposes a generic route to continuous time-crystalline order in dissipative bosonic field theories, with plausible relevance to laser-pumped magnets and magnonics. The Supplemental Material provides a structured analytic derivation, and the numerics reproduce the qualitative predictions (amplitude dip, square-root frequency onset), which gives the package some coherence. The falsifiable predictions for driven magnets and the connection to prior critical-exceptional-point universality classes are valuable. However, the correctness of the mechanism depends on the sharply peaked reservoir ansatz and on the leading-order loop expansion, and the quantitative inconsistency between the main-text formula and the SM expression must be resolved before the central claim is fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplemental Material, Eqs. (S6)–(S16)] The sign of the central antidamping result is derived under the sharply peaked reservoir occupation ansatz n(q)≈n_b δ(|q|−qΩ) (SM text above Eq. (S1) and Eq. (S5)). The calculation of the sub-integral I2 in Eq. (S11) then assumes a single relaxation rate γΩ and introduces a shell width δq without a precise definition. If the reservoir spectral function has finite width κ, the momentum convolution q1+q2+q3=0 in Eq. (S6) can receive significant contributions from configurations in which the third mode is far from zero momentum, and the frequency convolution can acquire imaginary parts of opposite sign. Since the entire time-crystal mechanism rests on the sign of δγ, the finite-width behavior of the sunset integral must be shown not to flip the sign; currently no such control is provided.
  2. [Main text Eq. (4) and SM Eq. (S16)] The main-text result Eq. (4) gives δγ = −Nγ λ² (qΩ n_b)², while the detailed SM expression (S16), with the prefactor Nγ defined immediately after, gives δγ ≈ −Nγ (qΩ n_b)² / γΩ² and contains no explicit λ². These two expressions differ in their parametric dependence on λ and γΩ, so the quantitative condition |δγ| > γ used in the main text is not backed by a single consistent formula. The authors should reconcile the prefactors and specify which expression underlies the phase diagram of Fig. 1b.
  3. [Main text and numerics for r<0] The analytic elimination of the reservoir is performed in the symmetric phase r>0 (main text, Eq. (4), and SM), whereas the extension to the ordered phase r<0, which is the regime relevant for the antiferromagnetic application and for the simulations of Fig. 2, is argued by analogy and not derived. The numerical observation of a limit cycle in Fig. 2 is indirect evidence: it does not directly measure δγ. A derivation for r<0, or at least a controlled argument that the same loop integral survives and retains its sign in the ordered phase, would materially strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplemental Material title] The section heading 'ELIMINA TION OF HIGH FREQUENCY BATH' contains a typo ('ELIMINA TION') and should be corrected to 'ELIMINATION'.
  2. [SM Eq. (S11)] The quantity δq appears after the delta-function ansatz n(q)≈n_b δ(q−qΩ); its definition as the width of the momentum shell should be stated explicitly and used consistently with Eq. (S5).
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains an errant space in 'Ω = 2 .15'; additionally, specifying that the simulations are performed in three dimensions would improve clarity.
  4. [Main text, paragraph on pumped magnetic materials] The sentence 'It then carries through as a parametric drive into the continuum limit' is grammatically awkward and could be rephrased for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Core antidamping calculation is self-contained; only minor non-load-bearing self-citation in the universality-classification section.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the derivation of a reservoir-induced antidamping shift δγ and heating ΔD by integrating out high-momentum modes created by a rapid parametric drive. This is a direct perturbative calculation (SM Eqs. S6–S16) starting from the stated Keldysh/MSRJD action. The reservoir occupation n(q) ≈ δ(|q|−q_Ω)n_b is introduced as an explicit control parameter, not fitted to the target quantities; δγ is obtained from a sunset integral, and the instability condition |δγ| > γ is an output of the calculation. The numerical simulation of the full time-dependent Langevin equation (Fig. 2) provides an independent check. The only self-referential element is the 'Universal scaling' section, which imports the O(3)×SO(2) and critical-exceptional-point classifications from the authors' own refs. [41,56] rather than rederiving them; this is a classification overlay and is not needed to obtain δγ < 0 or the limit-cycle phase. The sharply peaked reservoir ansatz and the apparent prefactor difference between Eq. (4) and SM Eq. (S16) are robustness/correctness concerns, not circular reductions. No load-bearing step reduces to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on four main assumptions: a sharply peaked reservoir occupation (an ad hoc tractability ansatz), the semiclassical Markovian bath description, a fast-drive separation of scales, and the heuristic extension to the ordered phase. These are stated transparently in the text and SM, but they are not derived from the drive parameters, and the mapping between the pump amplitude r_D and the reservoir occupation n_b is never established. There are no new particles, forces, or entities introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • n_b = not specified (increases with pump power r_D)
    Reservoir occupation density. It is the main tuning parameter in the effective theory; the paper does not derive its dependence on the drive amplitude r_D, so it is a free input.
  • γΩ = not specified
    Decay rate of the reservoir modes at momentum qΩ. The SM assumes Ω ≫ γΩ ≫ γ but does not compute γΩ from the model parameters; it enters the final δγ and ΔD expressions.
  • δq = not specified
    Width of the momentum shell of the reservoir occupation; it appears in the SM in products such as n_b δq and is not fixed by the calculation.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The reservoir occupation created by the pump is sharply peaked at a single momentum shell: n(q) ≈ δ(q - qΩ) n_b.
    Introduced in the SM (section 'Elimination of high frequency bath') to make the loop integrals tractable; it is an input modeling choice, not derived from the drive amplitude r_D, and it controls the sign and magnitude of δγ.
  • domain assumption The semiclassical (MSRJD) limit and Markovian Ohmic bath description are valid for the long-time, long-wavelength dynamics of interest.
    Stated in the main text after Eq. (2); the bath is modeled as Ohmic with γ(q)/D(q) = const, and non-Markovian contributions are dropped as subleading on large time scales.
  • domain assumption The drive is fast and the reservoir modes live at qΩ with dispersion ω(qΩ) ~ Ω, so a separation of scales Ω ≫ γΩ ≫ γ holds.
    Used throughout the SM to evaluate the sunset and one-loop integrals; the separation of scales is an assumption about the drive frequency and the bath, not derived from the model parameters.
  • domain assumption The same pumping mechanism applies in the ordered phase (r < 0) by exciting either high-momentum transversal modes or the gapped longitudinal modes at resonance.
    Argued heuristically in the 'Pumped magnetic materials' section; not derived analytically for r < 0, and the numerics provide only a single-parameter demonstration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonequilibrium orders in parametrically driven field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OLXL3SHY

@misc{pith2026250618622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonequilibrium orders in parametrically driven field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OLXL3SHY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18622}
}
read the original abstract

Driving quantum materials with coherent light has proven a powerful platform to realize a plethora of interesting phases and transitions, ranging from ferroelectricity to superconductivity and limit cycles in pumped magnonics. In this paper we develop the field theoretical framework to describe nonequilibrium phases that emerge in systems pumped by rapid parametric drives. We consider paradigmatic O(N) models that describe the long-wavelength fluctuations of ordering fields in many condensed matter set ups. We show that rapid parametric driving of these models can induce an effective pump mechanism in the long wavelength regime through nonlinear scattering. This induces a nonequilibrium transition into a time-crystalline phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Left panel: Sketch for magnon pump scheme. Middle panel: Schematic phase diagram of the driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Numerical simulations of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    U. C. T¨ auber,Critical Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Oxford University Press, 2002)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    Imamoglu, R

    A. Imamoglu, R. J. Ram, S. Pau, and Y. Yamamoto, Nonequilibrium condensates and lasers without inver- sion: Exciton-polariton lasers, Physical Review A 53, 4250–4253 (1996)

    1996

  4. [4]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szyma´ nska, R. Andr´ e, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Bose–einstein condensation of exciton polaritons, Nature 443, 409–414 (2006)

    2006

  5. [5]

    Balili, V

    R. Balili, V. Hartwell, D. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Bose-einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap, Science 316, 1007–1010 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    H. Deng, G. Weihs, C. Santori, J. Bloch, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Condensation of semiconductor microcavity ex- citon polaritons, Science 298, 199–202 (2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    Fontaine, D

    Q. Fontaine, D. Squizzato, F. Baboux, I. Amelio, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, M. Morassi, I. Sagnes, L. L. Gratiet, A. Harouri, M. Wouters, I. Carusotto, A. Amo, M. Richard, A. Minguzzi, L. Canet, S. Ravets, and J. Bloch, Kardar–parisi–zhang universality in a one- dimensional polariton condensate, Nature 608, 687 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Byrnes, N

    T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, Exci- ton–polariton condensates, Nature Physics 10, 803–813 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton-polariton bose-einstein condensation, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1489–1537 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    T. F. Nova, A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained srtio 3, Science 364, 1075–1079 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    X. Li, T. Qiu, J. Zhang, E. Baldini, J. Lu, A. M. Rappe, and K. A. Nelson, Terahertz field–induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric srtio3, Science 364, 1079–1082 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate, Science 331, 189–191 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Possible light- induced superconductivity in k3c60 at high temperature, Nature 530, 461–464 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    K. A. Cremin, J. Zhang, C. C. Homes, G. D. Gu, Z. Sun, M. M. Fogler, A. J. Millis, D. N. Basov, and R. D. Averitt, Photoenhanced metastable c-axis electrodynam- ics in stripe-ordered cuprate la1. 885ba0. 115cuo4, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 19875 (2019). 6

    2019

  8. [16]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dres- sel, A. Henderson, T. Siegrist, J. Schlueter, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Pho-...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    S. Fava, G. De Vecchi, G. Jotzu, M. Buzzi, T. Gebert, Y. Liu, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Magnetic field ex- pulsion in optically driven yba2cu3o6. 48, Nature 632, 75 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Zhang, F

    Z. Zhang, F. Y. Gao, Y.-C. Chien, Z.-J. Liu, J. B. Cur- tis, E. R. Sung, X. Ma, W. Ren, S. Cao, P. Narang, A. von Hoegen, E. Baldini, and K. A. Nelson, Terahertz- field-driven magnon upconversion in an antiferromagnet, Nature Physics 20, 788–793 (2024)

    2024

  11. [20]

    S. O. Demokritov, V. E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin, Bose–einstein condensation of quasi-equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping, Nature 443, 430 (2006)

    2006

  12. [21]

    Nowik-Boltyk, O

    P. Nowik-Boltyk, O. Dzyapko, V. E. Demidov, N. G. Berloff, and S. O. Demokritov, Spatially non-uniform ground state and quantized vortices in a two-component bose-einstein condensate of magnons, Scientific Reports 2, 10.1038/srep00482 (2012)

    2012 doi

  13. [22]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter (2023), arXiv:2312.03073 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions , second edition ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions , second edition ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  15. [24]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Physical Review B 40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  16. [25]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Physical Review Let- ters 109, 160401 (2012)

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Physical Review Let- ters 109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  17. [26]

    Shapere and F

    A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Classical time crystals, Phys- ical Review Letters 109, 160402 (2012)

    2012

  18. [27]

    Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Physical Review Letters 111, 070402 (2013)

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Physical Review Letters 111, 070402 (2013)

    2013

  19. [28]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of quan- tum time crystals, Physical Review Letters 114, 10.1103/physrevlett.114.251603 (2015)

    2015 doi

  20. [29]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016), arXiv:1508.03344 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [30]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Physical Review Letters 117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  22. [31]

    S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V. Khemani, C. von Keyserlingk, N. Y. Yao, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a dis- ordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543, 221 (2017),...

    2017 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observa- tion of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017), arXiv:1609.08684 [quant-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [33]

    N. Y. Yao, C. Nayak, L. Balents, and M. P. Zaletel, Clas- sical discrete time crystals, Nat. Phys. 16, 438 (2020), arXiv:1801.02628 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [34]

    M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium : Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 031001 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir` o, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Physical Review Letters 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  27. [36]

    Scarlatella, R

    O. Scarlatella, R. Fazio, and M. Schir´ o, Emergent finite frequency criticality of driven-dissipative correlated lat- tice bosons, Physical Review B 99, 064511 (2019)

    2019

  28. [37]

    Keßler, J

    H. Keßler, J. G. Cosme, M. Hemmerling, L. Mathey, and A. Hemmerich, Emergent limit cycles and time crystal dynamics in an atom-cavity system, Physical Review A 99, 053605 (2019)

    2019

  29. [38]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a continu- ous time crystal, Science 377, 670 (2022)

    2022

  30. [39]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature 592, 363–369 (2021)

    2021

  31. [40]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, The non-reciprocal ising model, arXiv preprint arxiv:2311.05471 (2024), arXiv:2311.05471 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [41]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequi- librium O(n) models, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021052 (2024)

    2024

  33. [42]

    S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Scalar active mixtures: The nonreciprocal cahn-hilliard model, Physical Review X 10, 041009 (2020)

    2020

  34. [43]

    Brauns and M

    F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal pattern formation of conserved fields, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021014 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    Suchanek, K

    T. Suchanek, K. Kroy, and S. A. Loos, Irreversible mesoscale fluctuations herald the emergence of dynam- ical phases, Physical Review Letters 131, 10.1103/phys- revlett.131.258302 (2023)

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Physical Review X 14, 011029 (2024)

    R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Physical Review X 14, 011029 (2024)

    2024

  37. [46]

    Hanai, D

    R. Hanai, D. Ootsuki, and R. Tazai, Photoinduced non- reciprocal magnetism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05957 (2024)

    2024

  38. [47]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal synchronization of active quantum spins, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03357 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  40. [49]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  41. [50]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Physical Review A 8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  42. [51]

    H.-K. Janssen, On a lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter and Quanta 23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  43. [52]

    De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes cri- 7 tiques, J

    C. De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes cri- 7 tiques, J. Phys. Colloques 37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  44. [53]

    Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , 2nd ed

    E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  45. [54]

    Walldorf, D

    N. Walldorf, D. M. Kennes, J. Paaske, and A. J. Millis, The antiferromagnetic phase of the floquet-driven hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 121110 (2019)

    2019

  46. [55]

    M. H. Kalthoff, D. M. Kennes, A. J. Millis, and M. A. Sentef, Nonequilibrium phase transition in a driven- dissipative quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023115 (2022)

    2022

  47. [56]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Nonequi- librium criticality at the onset of time-crystalline order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 167102 (2024)

    2024

  48. [57]

    Hanai, A

    R. Hanai, A. Edelman, Y. Ohashi, and P. B. Littlewood, Non-hermitian phase transition from a polariton bose- einstein condensate to a photon laser, Physical Review Letters 122, 185301 (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    Risler, J

    T. Risler, J. Prost, and F. J¨ ulicher, Universal critical behavior of noisy coupled oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 175702 (2004)

    2004

  50. [59]

    Risler, J

    T. Risler, J. Prost, and F. J¨ ulicher, Universal critical behavior of noisy coupled oscillators: A renormalization group study, Physical Review E 72, 016130 (2005)

    2005

  51. [60]

    L. M. Sieberer, S. D. Huber, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Dy- namical Critical Phenomena in Driven-Dissipative Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  52. [61]

    U. C. T¨ auber and S. Diehl, Perturbative field-theoretical renormalization group approach to driven-dissipative bose-einstein criticality, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021010 (2014), arXiv:1312.5182 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [62]

    S. M. Rezende, Theory of coherence in bose-einstein con- densation phenomena in a microwave-driven interacting magnon gas, Physical Review B 79, 174411 (2009)

    2009

  54. [63]

    Daviet, C

    R. Daviet, C. P. Zelle, A. Asadollahi, and S. Diehl, Kardar-parisi-zhang scaling in time- crystalline matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09677 10.48550/ARXIV.2412.09677 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  55. [64]

    Hardt, R

    D. Hardt, R. Doostani, S. Diehl, N. Del Ser, and A. Rosch, Propelling ferrimagnetic domain walls by dy- namical frustration, Nature Communications 16, 3817 (2025). 1 Supplemental Material: Nonequilibrium condensates in parametrically pumped field theories

    2025

  56. [65]

    ELIMINA TION OF HIGH FREQUENCY BA TH In this appendix we give the details on the elimination of the highly occupied reservoir modes at large momenta qΩ, which we call the fast modes ϕ>. To that end, we assume that the occupation of modes is peaked at these momenta, so that we ...

  57. [66]

    (S12) We are only interested in the frequency derivative at ω = 0: ∂ωIsunset(ω = 0,q = 0) = 2−6π−3 Z ∞ −∞ dtitI 1I2

  58. [67]

    (S13) This integral can be performed analytically. For Ω ≫γΩ≫γ it yields ∂ωIsunset(ω = 0,q = 0)≈−i(qΩnb)2 arctanZ2/Z1 256Z2γ2 Ω (S14) The full self energy contains additional factors of ( λ/4)2, the bare scattering of the original theory, a combinatorial factor of 2· 3 and a f...

  59. [68]

    Here we consider the case of an SO(3) but not O(3) symmetric theory

    UNIVERSAL SCALING IN THE PRESENCE OF FERROMAGNETIC COUPLING. Here we consider the case of an SO(3) but not O(3) symmetric theory. This is e.g. a ferromagnet in contrast to a Heisenberg antiferromagnet, where the Z2 redundancy of the Ne´ el vector causes the system to be fully ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.