Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 59 references

Rabi oscillations with close-range quantum vortex states

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multiply charged vortex that splits into a ring of five close vortices carries a second, slower orbital state invisible to point-vortex theory, and modulating the interaction strength resonantly populates that state.

desk verdict New close-range vortex states are real for ℓ=5, but the Rabi frequency is partly fitted and the rB-dependence is unchecked. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20482 v1 pith:QOS7OIHW submitted 2025-06-25 cond-mat.quant-gas

Sam Patrick This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quantumvorticespoint-vortexmodelGross-PitaevskiiequationvortexcoremodesRabioscillationsFeshbachresonancemultiplychargedclose-rangedynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when quantum vortices come close enough for their cores to overlap, the standard point-vortex picture misses an entire family of orbital motions. In the example of a vortex with winding number $\ell=5$ that splits into a ring of five unit vortices, it shows that alongside the primary splitting mode---the close-range continuation of point-vortex dynamics---there is a secondary, lower-frequency mode with no long-range counterpart. Seeding that secondary mode does not separate the vortices; their cores stay overlapped and the ring orbits more slowly. The paper then shows that modulating the condensate interaction strength $g(t)$ at the frequency difference between the two modes transfers population back and forth, so the secondary state can be populated from the primary one by resonant Rabi oscillations. If correct, this gives a concrete route to creating and observing close-range vortex states in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the negative-energy vortex modes ($N_\lambda=-1$, excitations that lower the total energy of the vortex) obtained from the Bogoliubov equations for the Gross-Pitaevskii order parameter, together with the WKB resonance condition $\cos S(\omega_{\rm vor})=0$ that counts them, where $S$ is the phase integral of the mode across the vortex core. Each zero of $\cos S$ is a distinct core-localized vortex state; larger $\ell$ widens the core, increases $S$, and produces the additional zeros that are the secondary modes. The Rabi transfer is carried by the coupling matrix element $\rho_{nn'} = \langle \psi_n | \delta L | \psi_{n'} \rangle_{\sigma_3}$ induced by the modulation $\delta g(t)$, with the rotating-wave solution $b_0(t) = i\tilde{\rho}\alpha\sin(\kappa t)/\kappa e^{-i\Delta t/2}$ giving out-of-phase sinusoidal population transfer at generalized Rabi frequency $\kappa=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\Delta^2+4|\tilde{\rho}|^2}$.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to diagonalize the Bogoliubov operator for an $\ell=4$ vortex with a finer or radially adapted grid at the same trap radius $r_B=8$ and ask whether the predicted $m=4$ mode at $\omega\sim 0.1\,c/\xi$ persists with the two-extrema mode function; if it disappears, the central claim fails. Experimentally, one could prepare an $\ell=5$ vortex, modulate $g$ at the fitted Rabi frequency, and track the five vortices: the claim predicts the ring should oscillate between the fast point-vortex-like rotation and a slower overlapped rotation, and an absence of any slowed period would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the linearized excitations of a multiply charged quantum vortex contain additional core-localized vortex modes whenever the winding number is large enough that the core is wide. For $\ell=4$ a secondary mode first appears at azimuthal number $m=4$ and frequency $\omega\sim 0.1\,c/\xi$; for $\ell=5$ secondary modes occur for $m=4,5,6$. These modes share the ring-of-vortices azimuthal structure, but their radial mode functions have a node inside the core, so the condensate density keeps its background value at the node and the vortices cannot separate. Seeding the secondary mode therefore leaves the five cores overlapped and orbiting more slowly than the point-vortex prediction, whereas the primary mode connects smoothly to that prediction at large separation. The Rabi mechanism is demonstrated numerically for $\ell=m=5$: modulating $g(t)=1+\delta g_0\sin\Omega t$ near the level difference transfers the population between primary and secondary states with the oscillating amplitudes of Eq. (11).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the WKB resonance condition $\cos S(\omega_{\rm vor})=0$ and the numerical diagonalization of the Bogoliubov operator on a $128\times128$ grid faithfully represent the true core dynamics; if the extra zeros are numerical or WKB artefacts, the secondary states---and the Rabi transfer built on them---would not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\ell \ge 4$, compact vortex clusters have at least two distinct core-localized orbital states for some azimuthal numbers, so their dynamics are richer than the point-vortex model predicts.
  • A resonant modulation of the interaction strength, which can be implemented with a Feshbach resonance, transfers population from the primary splitting mode to the secondary overlapping-core mode; optimal conversion occurs at $\Omega = \omega_1 - \omega_0$.
  • The secondary state is observationally distinguishable: whenever it dominates, the vortex ring's orbital frequency drops below the point-vortex value while the cores remain overlapped.
  • The same Rabi idea could in principle drive transitions between other vortex states, such as the threefold and fourfold splitting patterns of the $\ell=4$ vortex, providing access to slowly growing modes.
  • In kinetic theories of vortex gases and in multi-vortex collisions, close-range configurations may transiently occupy secondary states, so this linear theory offers a parameter-free description of a regime that point-vortex models currently cover with ad hoc rules.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not developed in the letter is to use the secondary mode's density node as a dynamical clamp: by holding the system near the Rabi resonance, one could keep an overlapping vortex cluster together for a controllable time, effectively using the mode as a switch between separated and overlapped vortex configurations.
  • The Rabi frequency $\kappa$ should scale with the mode overlap integral and thus with core size; measuring $\kappa$ as a function of $\ell$ or trap radius would test whether the two-level truncation captures the physics or whether coupling to phonons becomes important away from $r_B=8$.
  • For $\ell=4$, the paper's mechanism implies an $m=4$ secondary state at $\omega\sim 0.1\,c/\xi$; an experiment that drives an $\ell=4$ vortex at that frequency difference and observes a slowed, overlapping four-vortex cluster would extend the claim beyond the $\ell=5$ numerics.
  • An implication the letter leaves implicit is that for giant vortices the secondary modes become dense enough to act as a quasi-continuum of close-range orbital states, which could serve as an energy reservoir during vortex-cluster collisions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies a multiply quantized vortex (winding number ℓ) in a quasi-2D Gross-Pitaevskii condensate in a circular trap. Using linear Bogoliubov modes of the centered vortex, it identifies, in addition to the usual 'primary' negative-energy modes that drive splitting into a ring of ℓ vortices, a set of lower-frequency 'secondary' modes localized near the core; these appear first for ℓ=4 and are studied here for ℓ=5. Direct GPE simulations show that a seeded secondary mode does not split the vortex and instead produces a slower, overlapping-core orbital motion, in contrast to the primary mode. The paper then modulates the interaction strength g at a frequency matching the primary-secondary level difference and observes Rabi-like transfer between the two modes, comparing the mode amplitudes with a two-level rotating-wave model. The authors conclude that close-range vortex states not contained in the point-vortex model exist and can be populated from the primary states.

Significance. Strengths: the existence of the secondary states is supported by direct GPE simulations (Fig. 1(c)), not merely by an analytic extrapolation; the contrast between the splitting primary mode and the overlapping-core secondary mode is physically clear; and the proposed Feshbach-modulation protocol is concrete and, in principle, experimentally testable. The paper is also explicit about the numerical parameters and about the back-reaction correction used to recompute the chemical potential. If the concerns below are addressed, the result would be a genuinely new ingredient for vortex dynamics in compressible superfluids, with potential relevance to giant-vortex decay, polariton condensates, and close-range vortex-cluster collisions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Vortex states; Fig. 1 and footnote [42]] The central claim that the secondary modes are genuine core-localized close-range states, rather than artefacts of the finite trap, is not yet supported by a boundary-independence test. The existence run uses rB=15, while the Rabi run uses rB=8, and the manuscript itself notes that low-frequency phonons scale as ωph∼rB^{-1}; at rB=8 the lowest phonon frequency is of order 0.125, the same order as the secondary-mode frequency reported for ℓ=4 (ω∼0.1). With only 128 grid points and no rB-sweep, the 'secondary' mode at rB=8 could be a hybrid with the sound band rather than a bound core mode. I ask the authors to compute ω_s and the radial profile (as in Fig. 1(c2)) for several rB values (e.g., 8, 10, 12, 15) and to show that the secondary frequency and its two-node structure remain approximately unchanged while the phonon frequencies shift as 1/rB.
  2. [Numerical simulations; Eqs. (8)-(11)] The quantitative Rabi prediction is not independent of the simulation it is compared with. In the paragraph after Fig. 2(f), the coupling coefficients ρ~±nn' entering Eq. (9), and hence Eq. (11), are obtained by fitting the m=0 Fourier spectrum of the same numerical run used for the comparison in Fig. 2(d). The RWA curve therefore cannot validate the model's predictive power; it only shows that a two-level fit can reproduce the observed transfer. I request either a first-principles calculation of ρ~± from the eigenfunctions of Eq. (3) and δL of Eq. (7), or a cross-validation in which coefficients extracted from one run (e.g., δg0=0.1, ζ=1.00) are used to predict a different run (e.g., δg0=0.05 or a detuned ζ).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 and surrounding text] In the Fig. 2 caption, 'certical' should be 'vertical'; in the main text, 'In Fig. 2(e), we show the frequency content' should refer to Fig. 2(f), not Fig. 2(e).
  2. [References] Reference [13] has a garbled author list ('Y. McWilliams, J. C.and Pomeau'); please correct it.
  3. [Exciting the secondary mode] The abbreviation 'R W A' appears with unusual spacing; define it as RWA at first use.
  4. [Vortex states] The statement that the secondary mode first appears for ℓ=4 is based on the WKB zeros in Fig. 1(a) and is not directly simulated, since the grid-artifact motivation excluded ℓ=4; a sentence acknowledging this limitation would be helpful.
  5. [General] The manuscript does not state whether simulation code or data are available; given the numerical nature of the claims, a data-availability statement would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The existence of the secondary close-range vortex states is grounded in direct GPE simulation, but the quantitative Rabi prediction in Eq. (11) is partly circular: the coupling coefficients are fitted to the m=0 Fourier spectrum of the same numerical run whose Rabi dynamics they are used to predict.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Numerical simulations', paragraph on the m=0 frequency content feeding Eqs. (9) and (11).]
    "Noting that the dominant and leading sub-dominant contributions come from ±Ω and the lowest phonon frequencies at ±ω0 (ignoring the ω = 0 mode), we fit the coupling coefficients ρnn′ to a sum of four sinusoids at ±Ω, ±ω0 to extract the Fourier amplitudes ρ̃±nn′ used in Eq. (9)."

    The 'RWA prediction' of Eq. (11) is presented as a prediction of the Rabi oscillations and is compared with the numerical mode amplitudes in Fig. 2(d). However, the oscillation rate κ in Eq. (11) depends directly on |ρ̃|, and ρ̃±nn′ are obtained by fitting the m=0 Fourier response of the very same simulation whose Rabi dynamics they are used to predict. The quantitative Rabi period is therefore not derived from first principles; it is a restatement of the fitted spectrum. This does not make the existence of the secondary state circular, since that claim rests on separate direct GPE simulations, but it does make the Rabi-rate 'prediction' partly fit-based.

full rationale

The central claim—that secondary close-range vortex states exist and have no point-vortex counterpart—is supported by direct numerical simulation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, not by a self-referential derivation. The WKB resonance condition cos S(ωvor)=0 is imported from the author's prior work [24,40], but the paper independently verifies the resulting secondary modes by seeding them into full GPE dynamics and observing that they do not split the vortex and that the cores remain overlapping (Fig. 1(c)). Thus the self-citation is not the load-bearing evidence. The quantitative Rabi model is the one genuinely circular element: ρ̃±nn′ are fitted to the m=0 Fourier spectrum of the same run, so Eq. (11)'s rate is partly a fit. I score this 4 rather than 6 because the existence and qualitative Rabi transfer are still direct numerical outcomes; only the quantitative Rabi prediction reduces to its fitted input. The absence of an rB-sweep is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on numerical diagonalization of the Bogoliubov problem and on an effective two-level model whose coupling is fit to the simulation, not derived from first principles. The free parameters do not include new physics constants; they are simulation setup parameters and fitted coupling coefficients.

free parameters (6)
  • dissipation rate γ = 2.5e-2 (Fig. 1), 0 (Fig. 2)
    Phenomenological damping used to trigger growth of the seeded mode in the splitting simulation; set to zero in the Rabi simulation to avoid damping of the oscillation.
  • trap parameters V0, a, rB = V0=a=10, rB=15 (Fig. 1); rB=8 (Fig. 2)
    Chosen to keep phonon frequency high enough to avoid dynamical instability while placing the secondary mode in the core; rB=8 gives well separated levels for the two-level Rabi model.
  • modulation amplitude δg0 = 0.1
    Smallness ensures the linear perturbation treatment in Eqs. (6)-(7) is valid.
  • resonance detuning ζ = 1.00
    Set to the computed mode frequency difference ω1-ω0; the chemical potential shift is corrected via phase-drift measurement (footnote [45]), so ζ is quoted to 2 decimal places.
  • initial primary-mode amplitude α = 0.5
    Seed amplitude for the primary mode in the Rabi simulation; large enough to observe conversion, small enough to keep linearization approximately valid.
  • coupling coefficients ρ~± = not quoted, extracted by fitting the m=0 Fourier spectrum
    The Rabi frequency κ in Eq. (11) is computed from these values, which are fitted to the simulation's m=0 mode at frequencies ±Ω and ±ω0, so the quantitative Rabi period is not a first-principles prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dissipative Gross-Pitaevskii equation (2) with a hard-wall trap and γ is an adequate model of a quasi-2D BEC at T=0.
    The entire analysis is performed within this model; deviations in real condensates (e.g., thermal cloud, 3D effects) are not treated.
  • standard math Vortex modes are given by the zeros of cos S(ωvor_λ)=0 (WKB phase integral from Refs. [24,40]).
    Used to determine the mode spectrum in Fig. 1(a) and to identify secondary modes; the approximation is stated as valid when the density varies smoothly.
  • domain assumption Negative-norm (N=-1) modes with 2≤m≤2ℓ-2 correspond to distinct vortex configurations.
    Used to interpret primary and secondary modes as vortex states; inherited from the vortex instability literature (Refs. [24,40,41]).
  • domain assumption The two-level truncation (primary and secondary modes only) captures the Rabi dynamics; coupling to phonons and other m=5 modes is negligible.
    Justified by the small trap (rB≈8) and the dominance of the ±Ω component in the m=0 spectrum, but not derived rigorously.
  • standard math Small modulation δg0=0.1 keeps the response linear, so Eq. (7) and the mode-amplitude equations (8)-(11) apply.
    First-order perturbation theory; the paper checks against numerics but the assumption is inherent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rabi oscillations with close-range quantum vortex states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOS7OIHW

@misc{pith2026250620482,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rabi oscillations with close-range quantum vortex states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOS7OIHW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20482}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum vortices separated through distances much larger than their core size interact via their long-range velocity field. At smaller separations, however, the influence of the core's compressibility strongly influences the vortex dynamics. Using the example of a compact ring of five vortices, it is shown that close-range effects lead to a new (slower) state of orbital motion which is not predicted by the usual long-range theory. This secondary state can be created starting from the usual orbital state by modulating the interaction strength to induce Rabi oscillations between the states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20482 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. C. McWilliams, Submesoscale, coherent vortices in the ocean, Rev. Geophys. 23, 165 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    H. L. Kuo, On the dynamics of convective atmospheric vortices, J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 25 (1966)

    work page 1966

  3. [3]

    D. G. Grier, A revolution in optical manipulation, Nature 424, 810 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Blatter, M

    G. Blatter, M. V. Feigel’man, V. B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, and V. M. Vinokur, Vortices in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Wlaz lowski, K

    G. Wlaz lowski, K. Sekizawa, P. Magierski, A. Bulgac, and M. M. Forbes, Vortex pinning and dynamics in the neutron star crust, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 232701 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    A. L. Fetter and A. A. Svidzinsky, Vortices in a trapped dilute Bose-Einstein condensate, J. Phys. Condens. Mat- ter 13, R135 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    C. F. Barenghi, R. J. Donnelly, and W. F. Vinen, Quan- tized vortex dynamics and superfluid turbulence , Vol. 571 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    2013

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    V. N. Ryzhov, E. E. Tareyeva, Y. D. Fomin, and E. N. Tsiok, Berezinskii–kosterlitz–thouless transition and two- dimensional melting, Physics-Uspekhi 60, 857 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    T. W. Neely, A. S. Bradley, E. C. Samson, S. J. Rooney, E. M. Wright, K. J. H. Law, R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, P. G. Kevrekidis, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Character- istics of two-dimensional quantum turbulence in a com- pressible superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 235301 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    E. V. Kozik and B. V. Svistunov, Theory of decay of su- perfluid turbulence in the low-temperature limit, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 156, 215 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    A. J. Groszek, D. M. Paganin, K. Helmerson, and T. P. Simula, Motion of vortices in inhomogeneous Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023617 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    G. F. Carnevale, Y. McWilliams, J. C.and Pomeau, J. B. Weiss, and W. R. Young, Evolution of vortex statistics in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett 66, 2735 (1991)

    1991

  6. [14]

    Y. Shin, M. Saba, M. Vengalattore, T. A. Pasquini, C. Sanner, A. E. Leanhardt, M. Prentiss, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Dynamical instability of a doubly quan- tized vortex in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 160406 (2004)

    2004

  7. [15]

    Kawaguchi and T

    Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, Splitting instability of a mul- tiply charged vortex in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 70, 043610 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Kumakura, T

    M. Kumakura, T. Hirotani, M. Okano, Y. Takahashi, and T. Yabuzaki, Topological formation of a multiply charged vortex in the Rb Bose-Einstein condensate: Effectiveness of the gravity compensation, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063605 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Okano, H

    M. Okano, H. Yasuda, K. Kasa, M. Kumakura, and Y. Takahashi, Splitting of a quadruply quantized vortex in the Rb Bose-Einstein condensate, J. Low Temp. Phys. 148, 447 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Isoshima, M

    T. Isoshima, M. Okano, H. Yasuda, K. Kasa, J. A. M. Huhtam¨ aki, M. Kumakura, and Y. Takahashi, Sponta- neous splitting of a quadruply charged vortex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 200403 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Kuwamoto, H

    T. Kuwamoto, H. Usuda, S. Tojo, and T. Hirano, Dy- namics of quadruply quantized vortices in 87Rb Bose– Einstein condensates confined in magnetic and optical traps, J, Phys. Soc. Japan 79, 034004 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Shibayama, A

    H. Shibayama, A. Tsukada, T. Yoshihara, and T. Kuwamoto, Density dependence of charge-4 vortex splitting in Bose–Einstein condensates, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 85, 054401 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    H. Pu, C. K. Law, J. H. Eberly, and N. P. Bigelow, Co- herent disintegration and stability of vortices in trapped Bose condensates, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1533 (1999)

    1999

  14. [22]

    H. M. Nilsen and E. Lundh, Splitting dynamics of doubly quantized vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 77, 013604 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Zhu and L

    Q. Zhu and L. Pan, Splitting of a multiply quantized vor- tex for a Bose-Einstein condensate in an optical lattice, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 203, 392 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Geelmuyden, S. Erne, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Origin and evolution of the multi- ply quantized vortex instability, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 043104 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    S. Lan, X. Li, J. Mo, Y. Tian, Y. Yan, P. Yang, and H. Zhang, Splitting of doubly quantized vortices in holo- graphic superfluid of finite temperature, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (5), 1

    2023

  18. [26]

    S. Lan, X. Li, Y. Tian, P. Yang, and H. Zhang, Heat- ing up quadruply quantized vortices: Splitting patterns and dynamical transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221602 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    S. K. Adhikari, Stable controllable giant vortex in a trapped Bose–Einstein condensate, Laser Phys. Lett. 16, 7 085501 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Srinivasan, Vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates: A review of the experimental results, Pramana66, 3 (2006)

    R. Srinivasan, Vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates: A review of the experimental results, Pramana66, 3 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    S. N. Alperin and N. G. Berloff, Multiply charged vortex states of polariton condensates, Optica 8, 301 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Ruffenach, L

    W. Ruffenach, L. Galantucci, and C. F. Barenghi, Super- fluid drain vortex, J. Low Temp. Phys. 212, 375 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Delhom, K

    A. Delhom, K. Guerrero, P. Calizaya Cabrera, K. Falque, A. Bramati, A. J. Brady, M. J. Jacquet, and I. Agullo, Entanglement from superradiance and rotating quantum fluids of light, Phys. Rev. D 109, 105024 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Patrick, Quantum vortex stability in draining fluid flows, Phys

    S. Patrick, Quantum vortex stability in draining fluid flows, Phys. Rev. A 110, 013327 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    ˇSvanˇ cara, P

    P. ˇSvanˇ cara, P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, J. F. MacDonald, S. Patrick, R. Gregory, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Rotating curved spacetime signatures from a giant quantum vortex, Nature 628, 66 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    D. Wang, S. Song, B. Xiong, and W. Liu, Quantized vor- tices in a rotating Bose-Einstein condensate with spa- tiotemporally modulated interaction, Phys. Rev. A 84, 053607 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Gupta, R. Gregory, and C. F. Barenghi, Stability of quantized vortices in two-component conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 033201 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Berti, L

    A. Berti, L. Giacomelli, and I. Carusotto, Superradi- ant phononic emission from the analog spin ergoregion in a two-component Bose–Einstein condensate, Comptes Rendus. Physique 24, 113 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Kuopanportti, N

    P. Kuopanportti, N. V. Orlova, and M. V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Ground-state multiquantum vortices in rotating two- species superfluids, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043605 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    An and L

    Y. An and L. Li, Splitting dynamics of quantized com- posite vortices in holographic miscible binary superfluids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03561 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. P. Cockburn and N. P. Proukakis, The stochastic Gross-Pitaevskii equation and some applications, Laser Phys. 19, 558 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Geelmuyden, S. Erne, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Quantum vortex instability and black hole superradiance, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 033117 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Giacomelli and I

    L. Giacomelli and I. Carusotto, Ergoregion instabilities in rotating two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates: Perspectives on the stability of quantized vortices, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033139 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    The time step was ∆ t = L2/5N 2 x

    Simulations were performed on a square grid x ∈ [−L, L], with L = rB + 5 and Nx = 128 grid points (similarly for y). The time step was ∆ t = L2/5N 2 x . The initial vortex profile √¯neiℓθ was found by evolving Eq. (2) in imaginary time by factoring out the phase and simulating...

  35. [43]

    Timmermans, P

    E. Timmermans, P. Tommasini, M. Hussein, and A. Ker- man, Feshbach resonances in atomic Bose–Einstein con- densates, Phys. Rep. 315, 199 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    B. M. Caradoc-Davies, R. J. Ballagh, and K. Burnett, Coherent dynamics of vortex formation in trapped Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 895 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    This induces a small shift in the chemical potential µ which is calculated by measuring the phase drift in Ψ over the duration of the simulation

    The seeding of a linear mode in the nonlinear equation (2) introduces a correction to the vortex density due to back- reaction effects. This induces a small shift in the chemical potential µ which is calculated by measuring the phase drift in Ψ over the duration of the simulat...

  38. [46]

    Y. P. Sachkou, C. G. Baker, G. I. Harris, O. R. Stockdale, S. Forstner, M. T. Reeves, X. He, D. L. McAuslan, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and W. P. Bowen, Coherent vortex dynamics in a strongly interacting superfluid on a silicon chip, Science 366, 1480 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Vagov, A

    A. Vagov, A. A. Shanenko, M. V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, V. M. Axt, V. M. Vinokur, J. A. Aguiar, and F. M. Peeters, Super- conductivity between standard types: Multiband versus single-band materials, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174503 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    A. Y. Aladyshkin, A. V. Silhanek, W. Gillijns, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Nucleation of superconductivity and vor- tex matter in superconductor–ferromagnethybrids, Su- percond. Sci. Tech. 22, 053001 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    O. R. Stockdale, M. T. Reeves, X. Yu, G. Gauthier, K. Goddard-Lee, W. P. Bowen, T. W. Neely, and M. J. Davis, Universal dynamics in the expansion of vortex clusters in a dissipative two-dimensional superfluid, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033138 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Geelmuyden, S

    A. Geelmuyden, S. Erne, S. Patrick, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Sound-ring radiation of expanding vortex clusters, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 023099 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Cidrim, A

    A. Cidrim, A. C. White, A. J. Allen, V. S. Bagnato, and C. F. Barenghi, Vinen turbulence via the decay of multi- charged vortices in trapped atomic bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023617 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    P. H. Chavanis, Kinetic theory of point vortices: diffusion coefficient and systematic drift, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026309 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    P. H. Chavanis, Kinetic theory of onsager’s vortices in two-dimensional hydrodynamics, Physica A Stat. Mech. App. 391, 3657 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Sire and P

    C. Sire and P. H. Chavanis, Numerical renormalization group of vortex aggregation in two-dimensional decaying turbulence: The role of three-body interactions, Phys. Rev. E 61, 6644 (2000)

    2000

  47. [55]

    C. Sire, P. H. Chavanis, and J. Sopik, Effective merging dynamics of two and three fluid vortices: Application to two-dimensional decaying turbulence, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 84, 056317 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    M. T. Reeves, T. P. Billam, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Inverse energy cascade in forced two- dimensional quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 104501 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Gauthier, M

    G. Gauthier, M. T. Reeves, X. Yu, A. S. Bradley, M. A. Baker, T. A. Bell, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, M. J. Davis, and T. W. Neely, Giant vortex clusters in a two- dimensional quantum fluid, Science 364, 1264 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    A. S. Bradley and B. P. Anderson, Energy spectra of vortex distributions in two-dimensional quantum turbu- lence, Physical Review X 2, 041001 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    X. Yu, T. P. Billam, J. Nian, M. T. Reeves, and A. S. Bradley, Theory of the vortex-clustering transition in a confined two-dimensional quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023602 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.