Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

A Multi-Species Enskog-Vlasov Solver to Determine Evaporation Coefficients of Fluids in High Pressure Environments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A particle-based Enskog-Vlasov solver that treats short-range collisions separately for every species pair yields evaporation and condensation coefficients for high-pressure fluid mixtures, with the trace species neon showing the largest…

desk verdict Genuine multi-species Enskog-Vlasov extension with decent homogeneous validation, but the headline neon evaporation coefficients rest on an Onsager-inconsistent approximation that the validation does not exercise. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22162 v1 pith:73AR6EPW submitted 2025-06-27 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.comp-ph MSC 76P0582C40 PACS 47.45.-n64.70.F
keywords Enskog-Vlasovequationmulti-speciescollisionsolverevaporationcoefficientcondensationhigh-pressureargon-neonmixtureBMCSLpaircorrelationdirectsimulationMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a particle-based solver for the Enskog-Vlasov equation, a kinetic description of dense fluids that combines long-range mean-field attraction with short-range collisions, in which every pair of species is collided using its own diameter, mass ratio, and mixture pair-correlation function. The purpose is to supply the evaporation and condensation coefficients that transcritical fuel-injection models need at engine-relevant pressures and temperatures but currently lack. Validation against molecular dynamics relaxation, a reference single-species EV solver, and SAFT-VRQ Mie and classical density functional theory supports the method. The central result is that species-resolved collisions matter: with realistic argon and neon parameters, the trace species neon changes from an almost constant evaporation coefficient to one that is high at low pressure and decays exponentially with pressure, which single-species treatments miss.

What carries the argument

The central object is the species-resolved Enskog collision solver inside the Enskog-Vlasov framework. Its key new mechanical elements are: pairing loops that run separately over each candidate partner species so that the collision separation $d_{ij}$ is fixed before the partner search begins; a collision probability that uses the species-pair diameter $d_{ij}$, the partner species number density, and the BMCSL pair-correlation contact value $Y(n,d_i,d_j)$ evaluated along the collision line; and mass-weighted post-collision velocity updates with factors $2m_j/(m_i+m_j)$. The long-range Vlasov attraction is handled by precomputed species-pair convolution matrices, and evaporation and condensation coefficients are sampled using the Ishiyama flux-plane definition. The BMCSL pair correlation, derived from the Boublík-Mansoori-Carnahan-Starling-Leland mixture equation of state, is the piece that carries the new species-resolved dense-fluid collision physics.

What would settle it

Run a molecular dynamics simulation of an argon-neon liquid-vapor interface at 98 bar and 90 K with the same particle diameters and masses, using the Ishiyama flux-plane definition to count evaporated, reflected, and condensed neon atoms, and compare the neon evaporation coefficient against the solver's exponentially pressure-dependent prediction; a nearly constant coefficient would contradict the multi-species claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that accurate evaporation and condensation coefficients for high-pressure fluid mixtures require the Enskog collision integral to be solved separately for each species pair, using species-specific collision diameters, masses, and pair-correlation contact values, rather than lumping all species into a single-species collision treatment. Implementing this in an EV-DSMC framework, the authors reproduce molecular-dynamics relaxation times, match the reference single-species EV results when diameters are equal, and, with realistic argon and neon diameters and masses, produce qualitatively different neon evaporation coefficients. For the trace species neon, the multi-species treatment removes the nearly constant evaporation coefficient predicted by the single-species solver and yields instead a coefficient that is high at low pressure and decays exponentially with pressure. The authors take this as evidence that multi-species collision treatment is essential for realistic high-pressure evaporation modeling, and they provide extensive evaporation and condensation coefficient data for argon-neon mixtures over 24.5 to 98 bar and 90 to 142.5 K.

Load-bearing premise

The species-resolved collision rates depend on evaluating the mixture pair-correlation function at a single point between each colliding pair; the paper notes that this single-point evaluation is known not to satisfy the Onsager consistency relations and that the exact correction was too expensive to implement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-pressure evaporation and condensation coefficients for argon-neon mixtures over 24.5 to 98 bar and 90 to 142.5 K become available for use in transcritical injection and combustion models.
  • Single-species EV treatments of mixtures with disparate diameters or masses will mispredict trace-species evaporation coefficients, so existing single-species results for such systems should be re-examined.
  • The solver yields liquid-vapor compositions and interfacial density profiles consistent with a thermodynamic equation of state and classical density functional theory, giving a kinetic route to interface structure and thickness.
  • The non-superposable temperature and pressure dependence of argon's evaporation coefficient indicates that kinetic boundary conditions for mixture evaporation cannot be built from simple multiplicative superposition of separate dependences.
  • The adaptive pressure boundary and sub-cell pairing scheme make it practical to scan wide pressure and temperature ranges in a single set of simulations, enabling parameter studies that would be expensive with molecular dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the neon result carries over to other light trace gases at high pressure, earlier single-species Enskog-Vlasov evaporation coefficients for such mixtures should be treated with caution until a multi-species run is done.
  • The authors leave the Onsager inconsistency at the pair-correlation evaluation open; a natural next test is to compare the single-point BMCSL scheme against the exact Van Beijeren-Ernst correction for a simple binary relaxation and quantify the bias in species-resolved collision frequencies.
  • Because the evaporation coefficients appear to vary systematically with liquid density or interface thickness, the published data could support a reduced correlation for $\sigma_e(p,T)$ that the paper does not attempt.
  • A reader could also use the same solver for dissolution and degassing of light gases in hydrocarbon droplets, transferring the trace-species finding to fuel-injection scenarios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-species Enskog-Vlasov solver implemented in PICLas, in which the Enskog collision integral is treated separately for every species pair with species-dependent diameters, masses, and a BMCSL-based pair-correlation contact value. The solver is applied to argon-neon systems to compute evaporation and condensation coefficients at high pressures and temperatures, motivated by transcritical fuel-injection modeling. Validation includes binary hard-sphere relaxation against molecular dynamics data, reproduction of the equal-diameter results of Ohashi et al., comparisons of liquid-vapor equilibria and density profiles with SAFT-VRQ Mie and classical DFT, and sampling of evaporation/condensation coefficients as functions of pressure and temperature. The central claim is that the multi-species collision treatment materially changes the predicted neon (trace-species) evaporation coefficients compared with a single-species collision solver.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper delivers a reusable multi-species Enskog-Vlasov capability and provides high-pressure evaporation coefficients that are genuinely needed for transcritical spray and combustion models. The work has real strengths: the relaxation validation against molecular dynamics exercises a nontrivial multi-species collision operator with size and mass asymmetry; the comparison with Ohashi et al. anchors the solver to an established equal-diameter benchmark; and the evaporation coefficients themselves are not fitted parameters but simulation outputs. The BMCSL pair-correlation formulation is a sensible extension of the single-species Carnahan-Starling treatment. However, the paper's main quantitative claim about the importance of multi-species collisions for neon is produced by exactly the approximation whose applicability at a steep interface is acknowledged to be questionable, and the equilibrium validations are weakened by the use of fitted effective diameters. These issues are significant enough that the manuscript needs further work before the conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III D, Eqs. (12) and (20); Sec. V C, Fig. 8(b)] The midpoint-evaluated BMCSL contact value Y(n,di,dj) is load-bearing for the headline neon result, but the paper itself states (citing Van Beijeren and Ernst) that evaluating Y at a single point does not satisfy the Onsager relations for a multi-species Enskog equation, and that the required correction is computationally prohibitive. At the liquid-vapor interface the density varies on the scale of the collision diameter, so the gain and loss terms in Eq. (12) sample Y at systematically different densities, with a bias that depends on the species pair. The tests presented do not exonerate this assumption: the reservoir relaxation in Sec. V A is spatially homogeneous, and the Ohashi comparison in Sec. V B uses identical diameters and masses, so the asymmetric multi-species contact value is never exercised in a non-uniform setting. The large multi-species versus single-species difference in the neon evaporation coefficient (Sec. V C, Fig. 8b) is therefore produced by exactly the approximation whose validity is unconfirmed. Please provide a validation case with non-uniform density and unequal species diameters/masses, or quantitatively bound the error from the midpoint sampling, before drawing the conclusion that the multi-species solver is essential for neon.
  2. [Sec. V D, Fig. 9 and Table III] The argon effective hard-sphere diameter dAr(T) is fitted to SAFT-VRQ Mie liquid densities, and the neon diameter is fitted to NIST pressure data. The subsequent comparisons of liquid densities, mixture compositions, and interface profiles against SAFT-VRQ Mie and classical DFT are therefore not independent tests for the pure-fluid liquid branch: the fit guarantees agreement with the same equation-of-state family. The mixture comparisons do provide some information because they involve composition-dependent behavior not used in the fit, but the strength of the claimed cross-validation is reduced. Please quantify the sensitivity of the mixture results to the fitted dAr(T) values, or repeat a subset of the simulations with independently determined diameters, so that the equilibrium validation is not circular.
  3. [Sec. V D, Figs. 10-12; Sec. VI] The text states that the results 'closely aligned' with SAFT-VRQ Mie and classical DFT, but the displayed data show substantial deviations: at low temperatures the EV liquid neon mole fraction is almost twice the SAFT value, the vapor-branch discrepancies grow with temperature, the DFT T,x and T,p cases agree with the EV result only on different sides of the interface, and interface thicknesses differ by 6-20%. No quantitative error metrics are reported for composition or density profiles. Please provide quantitative deviations (for example, average absolute deviations in mole fraction and interface thickness) and discuss whether the discrepancies are consistent with the known mean-field and potential-model differences, rather than asserting close agreement without numbers.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. VI] The conclusion states that compliance with Onsager relations 'remains unconfirmed, as it neither strictly violates them nor explicitly incorporates known corrections,' which contradicts Sec. III D, where the midpoint evaluation is stated to not satisfy the Onsager relation. This internal inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. III D] The BMCSL-based pair-correlation expression in Eq. (20) is attributed to Yau et al. and is not new to this work; describing it as a 'new pair correlation function' in the abstract is misleading. The novelty lies in its use within the multi-species Enskog collision solver.
  3. [Caption of Fig. 11] The caption says 'The left branch is the liquid state and the right one is the liquid composition, respectively'; the second branch should read 'vapor composition.'
  4. [Sec. V B, Fig. 6] The deviations for the 'neon' evaporation coefficient at low pressure are described only qualitatively; a numerical value or uncertainty estimate would help the reader judge whether the agreement with Ohashi et al. is adequate.
  5. [Sec. V E, Fig. 13] No statistical uncertainties or sampling-error estimates are reported for the evaporation and condensation coefficients, which are central outputs. At minimum, error bars or a statement on sampling convergence should be added.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The pure-argon liquid-density comparison with SAFT-VRQ Mie is partially enforced by fitting dAr to that same EoS, but the evaporation and condensation coefficients are not fitted and retain independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section V D (Composition of Argon-Neon Mixtures), Fig. 9a, Fig. 11, Table III; Conclusions]
    "For argon, the liquid densities of pure argon at several temperatures are fitted to SAFT-VRQ Mie. The quality of this fit is shown in Figure 9a. ... The composition of the liquid and gas phase of all simulations are shown in Figure 11 and compared with SAFT-VRQ Mie."

    The argon hard-sphere diameter dAr is the parameter that sets the EV liquid density; fitting it to the SAFT-VRQ Mie saturation liquid density at each temperature (Table III) makes the pure-argon liquid density equal to SAFT-VRQ Mie by construction. The subsequent validation against SAFT-VRQ Mie therefore includes a component that was imposed by the fit, not predicted. In the binary mixture, the argon-dominated liquid side of Fig. 11 inherits this anchoring, so agreement there is partially circular; only the vapor composition and the neon-related differences are genuinely predictive. The conclusion that the results closely aligned with SAFT-VRQ Mie and reinforced the reliability of the solver overstates the independence of this particular comparison.

full rationale

The evaporation and condensation coefficients are produced by the Enskog collision probability (Eq. 12), the BMCSL pair correlation (Eq. 20), and direct flux sampling (Eqs. 28-29); none of these are fitted to the target coefficients. The binary relaxation comparison to MD (Sec. V A) and the Ohashi et al. comparison (Sec. V B) are external benchmarks, and the latter uses identical diameters and masses, so it does not exercise the species-asymmetric part of the solver. The one genuine circular element is the SAFT-VRQ Mie validation in Sec. V D: dAr is fitted to pure-argon liquid densities of that same EoS, and the mixture liquid-side comparison inherits the fit. This affects the claimed EoS cross-validation, not the multi-species collision contribution itself. The paper also states its own limitation that midpoint evaluation of Y does not satisfy Onsager relations and that the correction is computationally prohibitive (Sec. III D); this is a validation and correctness risk for the trace-species neon result, not a circular reduction, because the approximation is not equivalent to the output. Score 4 reflects one partially constructed validation while the central claim retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The key inputs pulled from prior literature or fitting are the effective hard-sphere diameters (fitted to SAFT-VRQ Mie and NIST data), the BMCSL/CS equations of state, the Sutherland potential parameters, and the Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rules. The midpoint-evaluated multi-species pair correlation is an acknowledged simplification with unresolved Onsager consistency.

free parameters (2)
  • Argon effective hard-sphere diameter dAr(T) = 3.364 Angstrom at 90 K to 3.117 Angstrom at 142.5 K (Table III)
    Fitted so that pure argon liquid densities match SAFT-VRQ Mie (Fig. 9a). This parameter directly controls collision cross-sections and the liquid density that enters all binary-mixture comparisons.
  • Neon effective hard-sphere diameter dNe = 2.566 Angstrom
    Kept constant across temperature; fitted to NIST pressure data for gaseous neon via Eq. (18) (Fig. 9b).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Enskog-Vlasov equation with a Sutherland potential (gamma=6) is an adequate model for real argon-neon interactions in the studied pressure and temperature range.
    The EV model combines a mean-field attractive tail with Enskog hard-sphere collisions. The paper attributes the composition deviations from SAFT-VRQ Mie and DFT partly to this modeling choice (Sec. V D), so the claim depends on it.
  • ad hoc to paper The BMCSL contact pair-correlation function (Eq. 20), evaluated at the midpoint of the colliding pair, gives accurate multi-species collision frequencies.
    The authors explicitly note that midpoint evaluation does not guarantee Onsager relations for multi-species Enskog solvers (citing Van Beijeren and Ernst) and that the correction is not implemented. This is an acknowledged simplification.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective hard-sphere diameters fitted to bulk thermodynamic data remain valid inside the inhomogeneous interface and for non-equilibrium evaporation.
    dAr(T) is fitted to homogeneous liquid densities and dNe to bulk gas pressures. Using these same diameters in the interface region and in kinetic evaporation sampling is an extrapolation that is not separately validated.
  • domain assumption The adaptive pressure boundary condition realizes the intended bulk pressure without perturbing the interface.
    Described in Sec. IV D. No sensitivity analysis is reported for the smoothing parameters or the Newton iteration used to set the inflow number density.
  • domain assumption The tanh-profile sampling planes of Ishiyama et al. (Eqs. 30-31) give evaporation coefficients that do not depend on the chosen interface-boundary position.
    The paper notes that sigma_e and sigma_c depend on the boundary position and adopts Ishiyama's convention to fix it. All reported coefficients use this convention.
  • domain assumption Cross-species diameters and potentials are obtained from Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rules (Eqs. 26-27).
    Used unless stated otherwise (Sec. IV E). For the real argon-neon simulations, no alternative mixture calibration is attempted in the EV solver.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Multi-Species Enskog-Vlasov Solver to Determine Evaporation Coefficients of Fluids in High Pressure Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/73AR6EPW

@misc{pith2026250622162,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Multi-Species Enskog-Vlasov Solver to Determine Evaporation Coefficients of Fluids in High Pressure Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/73AR6EPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22162}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a novel multi-species Enskog-Vlasov solver. It is used to determine evaporation coefficients of fluids under high-pressure conditions, a critical factor for efficient fuel mixing in internal combustion engines. The solver handles collisions for different fluid species separately, thereby accurately capturing species-specific interactions essential for realistic evaporation modeling. A new pair correlation function based on the BMCSL equation of state is employed to enhance modeling accuracy, though compliance with Onsager relations remains to be explored. Validation through various numerical simulations demonstrates the solver's capability. Results from binary fluid relaxation simulations closely match molecular dynamics (MD) data, highlighting accurate collision frequency modeling. Comparative studies against state-of-the-art models verify the solver's precision in predicting liquid-vapor equilibria and evaporation coefficients across diverse pressure scenarios. Detailed simulations of argon-neon mixtures with realistic particle diameters and masses underscore the significant improvements achieved by employing this multi-species approach over traditional single-species methods. Comparisons with the SAFT-VRQ Mie and classical density functional theory confirm the solver's reliability in predicting liquid and vapor compositions and detailed density profiles at interfaces over a wide range of pressures and temperatures. Further analyses illustrate complex dependencies of evaporation and condensation coefficients on temperature and pressure, consistent with existing research findings. Overall, this work advances computational modeling of multi-species evaporation processes in high-pressure environments at different temperatures, providing essential data for improved combustion modeling and broader applications in multi-phase fluid dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22162 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Geometry of an Enskog collision. The left particle is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Binary fluid relaxation in a reservoir compared to MD reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Dissolved ‘neon’ content at respective dimensionless [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Definition of particle fluxes across the liquid-vapor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Evaporation and condensation coefficients compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Evaporation and condensation coefficients for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: a. Neon is in a supercritical state in all simulations. Therefore, the pressure of gaseous neon is fitted to the NIST48 data by the least squares fit of Equation 18. The results are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Density profiles of the argon-neon mixtures compared to two different DFT results. The ’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Composition compared to SAFT-VRQ Mie. The solid black lines are the results of SAFT-VRQ Mie, whereas the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: 10-90 interface thickness of the simulations. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Evaporation coefficients of argon and neon at different temperatures and pressures. The dotted lines are eye-guides to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Sampled velocity distribution functions of the evaporated, reflected, and outgoing particles of argon and neon at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author C. W. \ Team , author H. Lee , \ and\ author J. R. \ (eds.) ,\ 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 title Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change \ ( publisher IPCC ,\ address Geneva, Switzerland ,\ year 2023 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    Lamanna , author B

    author author G. Lamanna , author B. Weigand , \ and\ author C. Steinhausen ,\ title title On the role of transcritical evaporation in controlling the transition from two-phase to single-phase mixing , \ @noop journal journal Atomization and Sprays \ volume 34 ,\ pages 13--35 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Frezzotti , author L

    author author A. Frezzotti , author L. Gibelli , \ and\ author S. Lorenzani ,\ title title Mean field kinetic theory description of evaporation of a fluid into vacuum , \ 10.1063/1.1824111 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 17 ,\ pages 012102 ( year 2005 a ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    author author J. M. \ Montanero \ and\ author A. Santos ,\ title title Monte Carlo simulation method for the Enskog equation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.438 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 54 ,\ pages 438--444 ( year 1996 ) ,\ note publisher: American Physical Society NoStop

  5. [5]

    author author J. M. \ Montanero \ and\ author A. Santos ,\ title title Simulation of the Enskog equation à la Bird , \ 10.1063/1.869325 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 9 ,\ pages 2057--2060 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    author author A. Frezzotti ,\ title title A particle scheme for the numerical solution of the Enskog equation , \ 10.1063/1.869247 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1329--1335 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    author author A. Frezzotti ,\ title title Monte Carlo simulation of the heat flow in a dense hard sphere gas , \ 10.1016/S0997-7546(99)80008-9 journal journal European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids \ volume 18 ,\ pages 103--119 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    Frezzotti , author L

    author author A. Frezzotti , author L. Gibelli , \ and\ author S. Lorenzani ,\ title title A Kinetic Model for Vapor ‐liquid Flows , \ 10.1063/1.1941585 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 762 ,\ pages 497--502 ( year 2005 b ) NoStop

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Frezzotti ,\ title title Boundary conditions at the vapor-liquid interface , \ 10.1063/1.3567001 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 23 ,\ pages 030609 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    author author A. Frezzotti ,\ title title Boundary conditions at the vapor-liquid interface , \ 10.1063/1.3567001 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 23 ,\ pages 030609 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  2. [10]

    Busuioc , author L

    author author S. Busuioc , author L. Gibelli , author D. A. \ Lockerby , \ and\ author J. E. \ Sprittles ,\ title title Velocity distribution function of spontaneously evaporating atoms , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Fluids \ volume 5 ,\ pages 103401 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  3. [11]

    Kobayashi , author K

    author author K. Kobayashi , author K. Ohashi , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Numerical analysis of vapor-liquid two-phase system based on the Enskog - Vlasov equation , \ 10.1063/1.4769670 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 1501 ,\ pages 1145--1151...

  4. [12]

    Busuioc \ and\ author L

    author author S. Busuioc \ and\ author L. Gibelli ,\ title title Mean-field kinetic theory approach to Langmuir evaporation of polyatomic liquids , \ 10.1063/5.0021227 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 32 ,\ pages 093314 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    Kon , author K

    author author M. Kon , author K. Kobayashi , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Method of determining kinetic boundary conditions in net evaporation/condensation , \ 10.1063/1.4890523 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 26 ,\ pages 072003 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  6. [14]

    Kon , author K

    author author M. Kon , author K. Kobayashi , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Kinetic boundary condition in vapor–liquid two-phase system during unsteady net evaporation/condensation , \ 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2016.12.001 journal journal European Journal of Mechanics - ...

  7. [15]

    Barbante , author A

    author author P. Barbante , author A. Frezzotti , author L. Gibelli , author P. Legrenzi , author A. Corigliano , \ and\ author A. Frangi ,\ title title A kinetic model for capillary flows in MEMS , \ 10.1063/1.4769612 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 1501 ,...

  8. [16]

    author author P. F. \ Barbante , author A. Frezzotti , author L. Gibelli , et al. ,\ title title A kinetic theory description of liquid menisci at the microscale , \ @noop journal journal Kinetic and Related Models \ volume 8 ,\ pages 235--254 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  9. [17]

    Frezzotti \ and\ author M

    author author A. Frezzotti \ and\ author M. Rossi ,\ title title Slip effects at the vapor-liquid boundary , \ 10.1063/1.4769638 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 1501 ,\ pages 903--910 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  10. [18]

    Busuioc , author A

    author author S. Busuioc , author A. Frezzotti , \ and\ author L. Gibelli ,\ title title A weighted particle scheme for Enskog - Vlasov equation to simulate spherical nano-droplets/bubbles , \ 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111873 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume ...

  11. [19]

    Tietz , author S

    author author R. Tietz , author S. Fasoulas , \ and\ author M. Pfeiffer ,\ title title Symmetric simulations of droplets with a particle based Vlasov - Enskog - Solver , \ 10.1063/5.0187426 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 2996 ,\ pages 120002 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  12. [20]

    Sadr \ and\ author M

    author author M. Sadr \ and\ author M. H. \ Gorji ,\ title title Treatment of long-range interactions arising in the Enskog – Vlasov description of dense fluids , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.11.005 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ ( year 2018 ),\ htt...

  13. [21]

    Sadr , author M

    author author M. Sadr , author M. Pfeiffer , \ and\ author M. H. \ Gorji ,\ title title Fokker- Planck - Poisson kinetics: multi-phase flow beyond equilibrium , \ 10.1017/jfm.2021.461 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 920 ,\ pages A46 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  14. [22]

    Shan , author L

    author author B. Shan , author L. Ju , author W. Su , author Z. Guo , \ and\ author Y. Zhang ,\ title title Non-equilibrium flow of van der waals fluids in nano-channels , \ 10.1063/5.0148857 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 35 ,\ pages 052004 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  15. [23]

    Frezzotti , author L

    author author A. Frezzotti , author L. Gibelli , author D. A. \ Lockerby , \ and\ author J. E. \ Sprittles ,\ title title Mean-field kinetic theory approach to evaporation of a binary liquid into vacuum , \ 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.054001 journal journal Physical Review Fluids ...

  16. [24]

    Ohashi , author K

    author author K. Ohashi , author K. Kobayashi , author H. Fujii , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Evaporation coefficient and condensation coefficient of vapor under high gas pressure conditions , \ 10.1038/s41598-020-64905-5 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volum...

  17. [25]

    Ohashi , author K

    author author K. Ohashi , author K. Kobayashi , author H. Fujii , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Vapor condensation induced by fast-moving liquid film in the presence of noncondensable gas molecules , \ 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106622 journal journal Interna...

  18. [26]

    Aasen , author M

    author author A. Aasen , author M. Hammer , author . Ervik , author E. A. \ Müller , \ and\ author . Wilhelmsen ,\ title title Equation of state and force fields for feynman--hibbs-corrected mie fluids. i. application to pure helium, neon, hydrogen, and deuterium , \ 10.1063/1...

  19. [27]

    Aasen , author M

    author author A. Aasen , author M. Hammer , author E. A. \ Müller , \ and\ author . Wilhelmsen ,\ title title Equation of state and force fields for feynman--hibbs-corrected mie fluids. ii. application to mixtures of helium, neon, hydrogen, and deuterium , \ 10.1063/1.5136079 ...

  20. [28]

    Hammer , author G

    author author M. Hammer , author G. Bauer , author R. Stierle , author J. Gross , \ and\ author . Wilhelmsen ,\ title title Classical density functional theory for interfacial properties of hydrogen, helium, deuterium, neon, and their mixtures , \ 10.1063/5.0137226 journal jou...

  21. [29]

    author author M. Grmela ,\ title title Kinetic equation approach to phase transitions , \ 10.1007/BF01011389 journal journal Journal of Statistical Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 347--364 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

  22. [30]

    a rmeleitung: Reibung und Selbst-diffusion in Gewissen verdichteten gasen und fl \

    author author D. Enskog ,\ @noop title Kinetische Theorie der W \"a rmeleitung: Reibung und Selbst-diffusion in Gewissen verdichteten gasen und fl \"u ssigkeiten \ ( publisher Almqvist & Wiksells boktryckeri-a.-b. ,\ year 1922 ) NoStop

  23. [31]

    author author J. E. \ Lennard-Jones ,\ title title Cohesion , \ 10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/301 journal journal Proceedings of the Physical Society \ volume 43 ,\ pages 461 ( year 1931 ) NoStop

  24. [32]

    Karkheck \ and\ author G

    author author J. Karkheck \ and\ author G. Stell ,\ title title Kinetic mean‐field theories , \ 10.1063/1.442154 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 75 ,\ pages 1475--1487 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

  25. [33]

    author author G. A. \ Bird ,\ @noop title Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ year 1994 )\ note google-Books-ID: Bya5QgAACAAJ NoStop

  26. [34]

    author author N. F. \ Carnahan \ and\ author K. E. \ Starling ,\ title title Equation of State for Nonattracting Rigid Spheres , \ 10.1063/1.1672048 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 51 ,\ pages 635--636 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

  27. [35]

    Boublík ,\ title title Hard‐ Sphere Equation of State , \ 10.1063/1.1673824 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 53 ,\ pages 471--472 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    author author T. Boublík ,\ title title Hard‐ Sphere Equation of State , \ 10.1063/1.1673824 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 53 ,\ pages 471--472 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

  28. [36]

    author author G. A. \ Mansoori , author N. F. \ Carnahan , author K. E. \ Starling , \ and\ author T. W. \ Leland , Jr. ,\ title title Equilibrium Thermodynamic Properties of the Mixture of Hard Spheres , \ 10.1063/1.1675048 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ vo...

  29. [37]

    author author D. H. L. \ Yau , author K.-Y. \ Chan , \ and\ author D. Henderson ,\ title title Pair correlation functions for a hard sphere mixture in the colloidal limit , \ 10.1080/002689797170860 journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 91 ,\ pages 1137--1142 ( year 1997 ...

  30. [38]

    Van Beijeren \ and\ author M

    author author H. Van Beijeren \ and\ author M. Ernst ,\ title title The modified Enskog equation , \ 10.1016/0031-8914(73)90372-8 journal journal Physica \ volume 68 ,\ pages 437--456 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

  31. [39]

    author author E. S. \ Benilov \ and\ author M. S. \ Benilov ,\ title title Energy conservation and \ H \ theorem for the Enskog - Vlasov equation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062115 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 97 ,\ pages 062115 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note publisher: Ameri...

  32. [40]

    Fasoulas , author C.-D

    author author S. Fasoulas , author C.-D. \ Munz , author M. Pfeiffer , author J. Beyer , author T. Binder , author S. Copplestone , author A. Mirza , author P. Nizenkov , author P. Ortwein , \ and\ author W. Reschke ,\ title title Combining particle-in-cell and direct simulati...

  33. [41]

    author author C. K. \ Birdsall \ and\ author A. B. \ Langdon ,\ @noop title Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation \ ( publisher McGraw-Hill ,\ address New York ,\ year 1985 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    author author A. L. \ Garcia \ and\ author W. Wagner ,\ title title Generation of the maxwellian inflow distribution , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.025 journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 217 ,\ pages 693--708 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Tanaka \ and\ author K

    author author S. Tanaka \ and\ author K. Shimamura ,\ title title Temperature relaxation in binary hard-sphere mixture system: Molecular dynamics and kinetic theory study , \ 10.1063/5.0011181 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 153 ,\ pages 034114 ( year ...

  36. [44]

    Kobayashi , author K

    author author K. Kobayashi , author K. Sasaki , author M. Kon , author H. Fujii , \ and\ author M. Watanabe ,\ title title Kinetic boundary conditions for vapor–gas binary mixture , \ 10.1007/s10404-017-1887-6 journal journal Microfluidics and Nanofluidics \ volume 21 ,\ pages...

  37. [45]

    Ishiyama , author T

    author author T. Ishiyama , author T. Yano , \ and\ author S. Fujikawa ,\ title title Molecular dynamics study of kinetic boundary condition at an interface between argon vapor and its condensed phase , \ 10.1063/1.1763936 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 16 ,\ pages...

  38. [46]

    Lafitte , author A

    author author T. Lafitte , author A. Apostolakou , author C. Avendaño , author A. Galindo , author C. S. \ Adjiman , author E. A. \ Müller , \ and\ author G. Jackson ,\ title title Accurate statistical associating fluid theory for chain molecules formed from mie segments , \ 1...

  39. [47]

    Dufal , author T

    author author S. Dufal , author T. Lafitte , author A. Galindo , author G. Jackson , \ and\ author A. J. \ Haslam ,\ title title Developing intermolecular-potential models for use with the SAFT-VR Mie equation of state , \ 10.1002/aic.14808 journal journal AIChE Journal \ volu...

  40. [48]

    author author W. E. \ Acree Jr. \ and\ author J. S. \ Chickos ,\ 10.18434/T4D303 title NIST Chemistry Webbook : NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69 \ ( publisher National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899 ,\ year 2000 )\ Chap.\ chapter Thermo...

  41. [49]

    Rehner , author G

    author author P. Rehner , author G. Bauer , \ and\ author J. Gross ,\ title title FeOs: An Open-Source Framework for Equations of State and Classical Density Functional Theory , \ 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04561 journal journal Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research \ volume 62 ...

  42. [50]

    author author V. G. \ Baidakov \ and\ author S. P. \ Protsenko ,\ title title Molecular- Dynamics Investigation of Phase Equilibrium and Surface Tension in Argon - Neon System , \ 10.1021/jp805566g journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 112 ,\ pages 17231...

  43. [51]

    Nitzke , author R

    author author I. Nitzke , author R. Stierle , author S. Stephan , author M. Pfitzner , author J. Gross , \ and\ author J. Vrabec ,\ title title Phase equilibria and interface properties of hydrocarbon propellant--oxygen mixtures in the transcritical regime , \ 10.1063/5.013897...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.