Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Quark Recombination

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quark recombination, not vacuum fragmentation, is argued to dominate how hadrons form in the dense quark matter of ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at intermediate transverse momentum.

desk verdict Candid, wide-ranging review of quark recombination by its architects; the energy-momentum gap is acknowledged but never quantitatively closed, which matters for the dominance claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.24023 v1 pith:GXH3JHGF submitted 2025-06-30 hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

Rainer J. Fries , Vincenzo Greco , Ralf Rapp This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords quarkrecombinationcoalescencehadronizationquark-gluonplasmaheavy-flavorhadronsellipticflownumberscalingquarkoniumregeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quark recombination is the idea that in a system dense with quarks and antiquarks, hadrons form by the direct phase-space overlap of the quarks themselves, rather than by the vacuum-like breaking of strings or by universal fragmentation. The paper argues that this mechanism dominated mid-rapidity hadron production in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate transverse momentum, roughly 2 to 8 GeV/c, and that it leaves specific fingerprints in data: an enhanced baryon-to-meson ratio, separate baryon and meson branches in nuclear modification factors, and approximate scaling of elliptic flow with the number of constituent quarks. The same mechanism is used to explain heavy-flavor observations, including the large $\Lambda_c^+/D^0$ ratio in proton-proton collisions at TeV energies and the regeneration of quarkonia such as $\psi(2S)$ and $B_c$ in heavy-ion collisions. If the paper is right, hadronization is not a single universal process: in dense environments it is controlled by quark phase-space overlap, and hadron yields become a probe of the quark distributions in the quark-gluon plasma. A reader should care because this turns hadronization measurements, especially of charm and bottom hadrons, into a way of extracting transport properties of hot QCD matter.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the Wigner-function coalescence formula: a hadron's momentum-space density is obtained by convolving the single-quark (and antiquark) phase-space distributions with a Wigner function, the quantum phase-space portrait of the hadron's internal wave function, and a momentum delta function identifying the hadron momentum with the sum of the quark momenta (Eqs. 2-3). For a thermal spectrum this overlap naturally favors baryons over mesons, and in the collinear limit it produces the quark-number-scaling relation $v_2^H(p_T)/n_q = v_2^q(p_T/n_q)$ (Eq. 4). To address the main theoretical weakness, the Resonance Recombination Model replaces the Wigner overlap with a Breit-Wigner cross section for two quarks scattering into a resonance, thereby enforcing energy-momentum conservation and the thermal equilibrium limit (Eq. 5). In the quarkonium sector the review invokes kinetic rate equations $N_Q(t) = \Gamma_Q(N_Q - N_Q^{eq})$ with in-medium reaction rates and binding energies, which implement hadronization as a continuous formation process rather than an instantaneous overlap (Eq. 7). These objects together convert measured hadron spectra and flow into statements about the underlying quark phase-space distribution.

What would settle it

A measurement that would settle the core claim: high-precision $v_2(\Lambda_c^+)$ relative to $v_2(D^0)$ in 20-30% central Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV. With space-momentum correlations, recombination predicts $v_2(\Lambda_c^+) > v_2(D^0)$ for $p_T \gtrsim 4$ GeV/c; a null result or the opposite ordering would rule out coalescence dominance in that window.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Quark recombination is the assertion that in a dense partonic system a hadron's production is governed by the overlap of its constituent quarks in phase space: the hadron momentum distribution is the convolution of quark distributions with a Wigner function representing the hadron wave function, subject to momentum conservation but not, in the basic formalism, energy conservation. For a thermal parton spectrum this construction makes baryon production comparable to or stronger than meson production at the same momentum, because three quarks enter at $p_T/3$ where the distribution is exponentially larger, whereas a meson needs two quarks at $p_T/2$ (Eqs. 2-3). The paper assembles the experimental signatures that it says confirm this picture: the 2003-era antiproton/pion anomaly, the constituent-quark-number scaling of elliptic flow over the range of collision energies explored in heavy-ion experiments, the large $\Lambda_c^+/D^0$ ratio and its multiplicity dependence in proton-proton collisions, and the low-$p_T$ enhancement and flow pattern of heavy-flavor hadrons in nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions. It also claims that a kinetic transport formulation of quarkonium regeneration, including sequential regeneration of charmonia and coalescence-induced enhancement of $B_c$, represents a dynamical continuation of the same recombination physics. The discovery presented is that hadronization in dense matter is a local, medium-dependent coalescence process rather than a universal vacuum fragmentation process.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that hadrons form when quarks overlap in space and momentum, even though the quarks' energy and momentum do not add up to the hadron's unless the surrounding medium provides the missing balance; if the medium cannot provide it, all predicted spectra and yields lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fragmentation functions lose their universality: in dense systems the same parton spectrum produces species-dependent hadron abundances, so baryon/meson ratios and $R_{AA}$ curves cannot be understood through vacuum fragmentation alone.
  • Constituent-quark-number scaling of elliptic flow becomes a discriminating observable: at intermediate $p_T$ the $\phi$ meson should follow meson behavior rather than proton behavior, since what matters is valence quark number, not mass.
  • Heavy-flavor hadrochemistry becomes a diagnostic of the charm and bottom phase-space distributions, with the $\Lambda_c^+/D^0$ ratio and the ratio $v_2(\Lambda_c^+)/v_2(D^0)$ separating coalescence models with and without space-momentum correlations.
  • Quarkonium regeneration is predicted to be sizable and sequential: $\psi(2S)$ forms later than $J/\psi$, and $B_c$ mesons should show a strong low-$p_T$ enhancement in central Pb-Pb collisions, both of which can be confronted with collider data.
  • A system-size and multiplicity scan from proton-proton through proton-nucleus to nucleus-nucleus collisions should reveal the onset of coalescence as a function of parton density, including enhanced production of multi-charm baryons such as $\Xi_{cc}$ and $\Omega_{ccc}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if coalescence is the dominant channel well into the tens-of-GeV/c window for heavy flavor, the transition to fragmentation should appear as a break in the $p_T$-dependence of the $\Lambda_c^+/D^0$ and $B_c^+/B^0$ ratios; locating that break would map the boundary between the two regimes.
  • Beyond the paper: because the basic Wigner formalism does not conserve energy and momentum, the extracted heavy-quark diffusion coefficient may carry a hadronization-model uncertainty; a full Boltzmann treatment of in-medium recombination at low $p_T$ could quantify that bias.
  • Beyond the paper: the same overlap logic would predict that multi-charm baryon yields grow faster than linearly with the number of charm pairs per event, a scaling that a future high-multiplicity proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus comparison could test.
  • Beyond the paper: if recombination acts inside jets as well, jet-hadron chemistry in proton-proton and electron-positron collisions should show a multiplicity-dependent baryon enhancement, giving an independent, collision-system-free test of the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This review article by Fries, Greco, and Rapp surveys quark recombination (coalescence) as a hadronization mechanism in high-energy collisions. The paper traces the theoretical development from early recombination models in pion-beam fixed-target experiments through the RHIC-era baryon/meson anomaly, to current LHC-era heavy-flavor observables in AA and pp collisions, and it closes with a discussion of quarkonium transport and regeneration. The central claim is that in ultra-relativistic AA collisions, recombination of in-medium quarks is the dominant hadronization mechanism at intermediate transverse momentum (about 2-8 GeV/c), and that recent heavy-flavor data in pp collisions provide evidence for the onset of coalescence. The review is candid about several limitations, including the energy-momentum violation in the instantaneous coalescence formalism (Sec. 2.2), the ad hoc normalization of full charm coalescence as pT tends to zero (Sec. 2.3), and the absence of a fully dynamical microscopic description (Sec. 5).

Significance. If the central claim is correct, it would establish that hadronization is not governed by universal vacuum fragmentation functions but can be dominated by quark phase-space overlap in dense systems, with consequences for the interpretation of RHIC and LHC data, for heavy-flavor transport coefficients, and for quarkonium regeneration. The review's strengths are its comprehensive historical coverage, its explicit acknowledgment of the main objections to coalescence, and its identification of falsifiable predictions, notably the predicted v2 ordering of Lambda_c vs D mesons, the centrality-dependent peak in Lambda_c/D0 in AA, the enhanced Bc production at low pT, and the multiplicity dependence of Lambda_b/B0. However, the evidential case relies heavily on models developed by the same three authors (Catania, TAMU, RRM, SHM+RQM), and several of the headline comparisons are fits with free parameters rather than clean parameter-free predictions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2)-(3) and Eq. (5)] The central claim that recombination dominates hadronization at intermediate pT is supported in Sec. 3 by model-data comparisons drawn from the instantaneous Wigner-overlap formalism, Eqs. (2)-(3), which violates energy conservation because two or three on-shell quarks cannot combine into an on-shell hadron while conserving four-momentum. The energy-conserving RRM, Eq. (5), is introduced as the appropriate framework, but the review never presents a quantitative comparison between Eqs. (2)-(3) and Eq. (5) for the same observables in the claimed dominance window of 2-8 GeV/c. The statement in Sec. 2.2 that the energy issue is 'more relevant in the determination of spectra at low pT and absolute hadronic yields in the light sector' does not settle the question at intermediate pT, where a thermal quark distribution can populate large-invariant-mass pairs that the overlap formula counts as recombining but the Breit-Wigner form of Eq. (5) would reject. A quantitative comparison of baryon-to-meson ratios, v2, or charm-hadron ratios between Eqs. (2)-(3) and Eq. (5) is needed before the summary claim in Sec. 5 can be regarded as established.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Sec. 2.4, Fig. 7] The review states in Sec. 2.3 that the large Lambda_c/D0 predictions in AA collisions are obtained 'by enforcing that in the limit pT to 0, all charm quarks hadronize by coalescence.' This is a normalization assumption, not a derived consequence of the coalescence formalism, and it directly inflates the low-pT charm-baryon predictions that are then compared with STAR and ALICE data in Sec. 3.2.2 and Fig. 7. Similarly, the SHM+RQM description of the pp Lambda_c/D0 enhancement in Sec. 2.4 relies on adding excited charm-baryon states beyond the PDG listings, with the yields of those states themselves adjusted. The agreement with experiment shown in Fig. 7 is therefore at least partly a fit. The review should explicitly separate such constrained comparisons from parameter-free predictions and identify a measurement that would falsify the recombination mechanism if it failed. Without this separation, the claim that recombination is 'enabled a description of several important experimental observables' is overstated.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.1, Figs. 4-5] The flow-only alternative for the baryon/meson splitting at intermediate pT is discussed in Sec. 3.2.1 and is dismissed on the basis of the phi-meson data and NCQ scaling, but no quantitative model comparison is shown. The paper cites Ref. [84] as able to 'qualitatively reproduce key differences between protons and pions at intermediate pT' in a flow-plus-fragmentation picture, yet it does not confront that class of models with the v2/NCQ data of Fig. 5 or the phi-meson data of Fig. 4. Since the flow-only scenario is the main competing explanation for the same observables, the conclusion that the valence quark number is the relevant variable would be considerably strengthened by a side-by-side comparison of a flow-only calculation and a coalescence calculation against the same data set, or by an explicit statement that such a comparison does not yet exist.
  4. [Sec. 2.4, Sec. 3.1] The claim that pp collisions at TeV energies show 'signatures of (the onset of) quark coalescence' is based primarily on the enhanced Lambda_c/D0 and Lambda_b/B0 ratios. However, the alternative explanations are not equally weighted: PYTHIA with color reconnection reproduces the same data via a mechanism that is not coalescence in the Wigner-overlap sense, and the SHM+RQM model is a statistical hadronization model with an augmented spectrum, not a coalescence calculation. The paper notes that SHM 'is not necessarily distinct from the coalescence model,' but the body of Sec. 2.4 treats agreement with these models as evidence for recombination. The review should discuss what observable, if any, distinguishes genuine phase-space recombination from string-based color reconnection and from statistical hadronization with additional states, otherwise the pp part of the central claim is underdetermined.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 2.4] There is a typographical error: 'PYHTIA event generator' should read 'PYTHIA event generator.'
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The notation with 'folding' and '⊗' in Eqs. (2) and (3) is informal; the integration measures, the spin-color statistical factors, and the precise definition of the Wigner functions should be stated explicitly for the equations to be reproducible.
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption of Fig. 6 contains illegible artifact strings such as '/s48 /s50 /s52 /s54 /s56 /s49/s48 /s49/s50' that render the caption unintelligible; this must be corrected before publication.
  4. [Sec. 1] The text says 'We first review hadron-production models in elementary-collision systems ... in Sec. 1,' but Sec. 1 is the Introduction; the intended reference is Sec. 2.1.
  5. [Sec. 3.1] The sentence 'PYTHIA can describe the data after some tuning (see Ref. 1)' cites Ref. [1] (Ali and Kramer, Jets and QCD), which is not a tuning reference; a more appropriate citation to a PYTHIA tuning or a specific Monte Carlo study is needed.
  6. [Sec. 3.2.1] The statement that 'the phi meson unanimously behaves like a meson' is not accompanied by a direct citation to a measurement; Fig. 4 shows ALICE data, but the text should cite the specific analysis that establishes the phi-meson behavior versus protons.
  7. [Sec. 4] The discussion of quarkonium transport is useful, but it sits somewhat outside the review's main recombination narrative; a brief paragraph connecting the quarkonium regeneration mechanism to the open-heavy-flavor coalescence formalism would improve the coherence of the review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's evidence is anchored in external experimental data and the model assumptions are explicitly disclosed.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a new derivation, and its central claim—that quark recombination dominates hadronization at intermediate pT in AA and increasingly in pp for heavy flavor—is supported by comparisons to external measurements (PHENIX, STAR, ALICE, CMS, LHCb) and by cross-checks against alternative frameworks (PYTHIA, PYTHIA-CR, EPOS4, POWLANG, hydrodynamic models). The coalescence formulas in Eqs. (2)–(3) are model assumptions, and the quark-number-scaling relation in Eq. (4) is a nontrivial derived consequence, not a restatement of the input. The paper explicitly flags its own limitations: the energy-conservation violation of the instantaneous Wigner-overlap picture (Sec. 2.2), the enforced 100% charm coalescence at low pT (Sec. 2.3), and the absence of a fully dynamical microscopic description (Sec. 5). These are open validity and correctness concerns, not circular reductions. The SHM+RQM enhancement of Lambda_c/D0 in pp is obtained by adding excited charm-baryon states motivated by independent relativistic-quark-model and lattice-QCD predictions; while this is a model input that increases the ratio, the paper does not present the ratio as a fitted parameter, and the comparison is to independent ALICE data. The authors do cite their own prior work heavily, but the load-bearing evidence is not an unverified self-citation chain; the cited models are themselves benchmarked against external observables. No step in the paper reduces, by definition or by construction, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The review itself fits no new parameters, but its case for recombination imports several tuned inputs from the cited models. The most consequential are: the number and properties of excited charm/bottom baryon states beyond PDG in the statistical-hadronization explanation of Lambda_c/D0 and Lambda_b/B0; the enforced 100 percent coalescence fraction for charm at pT to 0; Wigner-function widths and coalescence radii that set the absolute rate of recombination; and the in-medium quarkonium potential that determines binding energies and reaction rates. None of these is derived in the review; each is a model choice carried over from the primary literature, mostly authored by the same group. The quarkonium rate-equation treatment (Eq. 7) inherits a quasi-particle, semi-classical assumption that the authors themselves flag as needing open-quantum-system corrections.

free parameters (5)
  • Hadron Wigner function widths / coalescence radii = Not quoted; e.g., radius parameters in B_c coalescence model (Fig. 10, lower panel)
    These set the absolute recombination probability in Eqs. (2)-(3); the review shows an uncertainty band from these radii (Fig. 10) but no derivation or central value.
  • Excited charm and bottom baryon spectrum beyond PDG (SHM+RQM) = Augmented set raising Lambda_c/D0 to 0.45-0.57 (ref [59])
    The 'missing' charm states beyond PDG are a model input in the statistical-hadronization explanation of the pp Lambda_c/D0 ratio; the review concedes pp data prefer simple SU(3) counting (Secs. 2.4, 3.1), so this spectrum is effectively tuned.
  • Charm coalescence fraction at pT to 0 = 100 percent at pT = 0 (Sec. 2.3)
    Large Lambda_c/D0 predictions in AA are obtained by enforcing that all charm quarks hadronize by coalescence at pT to 0, acknowledged in Sec. 2.3 as a boundary condition, not a derived result.
  • Heavy-quark fugacities gamma_Q in quarkonium rate equations = Chosen to match total HQ pair number (Sec. 4)
    In Eq. (7) the equilibrium abundance N_eq is fixed by gamma_Q factors matched to the assumed open-heavy-flavor content; this anchors the regeneration yield to model assumptions about HQ multiplicity.
  • In-medium quarkonium potential with screening = Internal-energy potential of ref [104]
    Binding energies E_B from the potential control dissociation and regeneration rates (Fig. 8); the review notes different potential choices yield different rates and calls non-perturbative improvements an open issue (Sec. 4).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption In-medium quarks are well-defined quasi-particles with phase-space distributions f_q(x,p).
    Presupposed by Eqs. (2)-(5); the review itself notes a strongly coupled medium may demand broad spectral functions rather than quasi-particles (Sec. 2.2).
  • ad hoc to paper Instantaneous 2-to-1 or 3-to-1 recombination of on-shell quarks into an on-shell hadron is a valid approximation, with the medium supplying momentum balance.
    The standing criticism flagged in Sec. 2.2; the medium-participation argument is qualitative and the review states a fully dynamical microscopic description is missing.
  • domain assumption Light-quark spectra at hadronization are thermal plus flow, with T_H around 155-165 MeV.
    Feeds the coalescence and SHM comparisons (Secs. 2.2, 2.4); values taken from the lattice crossover and statistical-hadronization analyses, not derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper Quark-number scaling of v2 follows from collinear coalescence with delta-function Wigner functions and is approximately preserved when relaxed.
    The review states the clean derivation requires unrealistic assumptions (Sec. 2.2) and that NCQ scaling is not a general property of recombination (Pratt-Pal, Sec. 3.2.1).
  • domain assumption Charm and bottom hadrons are populated in relative chemical equilibrium at hadronization in SHM-based explanations.
    Used for Lambda_c/D0 and Lambda_b/B0 comparisons (Sec. 2.4, refs [59,73]); the review notes canonical-ensemble corrections are needed at low multiplicity.
  • domain assumption Semi-classical Boltzmann/rate-equation kinetics (Eq. 7) with a thermal equilibrium limit governs quarkonium dissociation and regeneration.
    Adopted from refs [99-101]; the review flags that open-quantum-system corrections are necessary when binding energies are small (Secs. 4, 5).
invented entities (3)
  • Excited charm (and bottom) baryon states beyond PDG listings
    purpose: Raise the Lambda_c/D0 and Lambda_b/B0 predictions in pp to match measurements.
    Masses are predicted by quark model and lattice, but the states are not individually observed, and the review notes the data prefer simple SU(3) color counting for the l=1 diquark suppression, so the augmented spectrum functions as a tuned input (Sec. 2.4).
  • Diquark doorway states in baryon recombination
    purpose: Two-step baryon formation: quark-quark to a color-antitriplet diquark, then quark-diquark to the baryon.
    Motivated by attractive qq interactions but introduced as a model construct in the RRM (Sec. 2.2); the review offers no independent experimental handle on the doorway state itself.
  • Dynamically emerging heavy-light resonances in the QGP (T-matrix) independent evidence
    purpose: Unify the non-perturbative heavy-quark interaction with the color-neutralization/recombination mechanism.
    The resonance picture is constrained by the heavy-quark diffusion coefficient extracted from data (2 pi D_s T between 1.5 and 4.5, Sec. 3.2.2); indirect but data-anchored.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quark Recombination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GXH3JHGF

@misc{pith2026250624023,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quark Recombination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GXH3JHGF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.24023}
}
abstract

Hadronization is a fundamental process occurring at a distance scale of about $1\,\rm fm \simeq \Lambda_{QCD}^{-1} $, hence within non-perturbative dynamics. In elementary collisions, like $e^+e^-$, $e^-p$, or $pp$, phenomenological approaches to hadronization have been developed based on vacuum-like dynamics that require the creation of quark-antiquark and/or diquark pairs during the hadronization process. In the 2000s, the idea was developed that in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions, which lead to the formation of a partonic medium with large (anti-)quark densities, hadronization can occur through the recombination of in-medium quarks, unlike the situation in $e^+e^-$, $e^-p$, and $pp$. We give an overview of the main features that characterize quark recombination and have enabled a description of several important experimental observables at both RHIC and LHC over the last two decades. We highlight some additional developments and open issues. We specifically discuss the impact of coalescence on the study of heavy-flavor hadronization, including recent developments showing signatures of (the onset of) quark coalescence even in $pp$ collisions at TeV energies. Furthermore, we highlight specific features of hadronization for quarkonium in AA collisions, where it has been possible to develop a dynamical kinetic approach that allows to extract more detailed information about the temperature dependence of the heavy-quark interaction in hot QCD matter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First measurement of $\mathbf{\rm \Xi_{\rm c}^{0}}$ production in $\mathbf{Pb}-\mathbf{Pb}$ collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{\textit{s}_{\rm NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV

    nucl-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    First measurement of prompt Ξ_c^0 baryon production in Pb–Pb collisions at √s_NN=5.02 TeV finds a nuclear modification factor reaching about 3 in the 3 < p_T < 4 GeV/c interval in 0–10% central events.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [84]

    Hirano and Y

    T. Hirano and Y. Nara: Interplay between soft and hard hadronic components for identified hadrons in relativistic heavy ion collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev.C 69, 034908 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [1]

    Ali and G

    A. Ali and G. Kramer: Jets and QCD: A Historical Review of the Discovery of the Quark and Gluon Jets and its Impact on QCD, Eur. Phys. J. H 36, 245-326 (2011)

    2011

  3. [2]

    Bazavov, D

    A. Bazavov, D. Bollweg, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Schmidt and S. Sharma: Charm degrees of freedom in hot matter from lattice QCD, Phys. Lett.B 850, 138520 (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    S. Y. F. Liu and R. Rapp:𝑇-matrix Approach to Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev.C 97, 034918 (2018)

    2018

  5. [4]

    Hagedorn and K

    R. Hagedorn and K. Redlich: Statistical Thermodynamics in Relativistic Particle and Ion Physics: Canonical or Grand Canonical?, Z. Phys. C 27, 541 (1985)

    1985

  6. [5]

    An introduction to the Statistical Hadronization Model

    F. Becattini: An Introduction to the Statistical Hadronization Model,preprint arXiv:0901.3643 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [6]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings: Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123-151 (2013)

    2013

  8. [7]

    Arnaldi et al

    R. Arnaldi et al. [NA60]: NA60 results on thermal dimuons, Eur. Phys. J. C 61 , 711-720 (2009)

    2009

Show all 125 references
  1. [8]

    Braun-Munzinger, K

    P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel: Particle production in heavy ion collisions, in Quark Gluon Plasma 3, World Scientific (2004)

    2004

  2. [9]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman and T. Sjostrand: Parton Fragmentation and String Dynamics, Phys. Rept. 97, 31-145 (1983)

    1983

  3. [10]

    Sjostrand: High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4, Comput

    T. Sjostrand: High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82, 74-90 (1994)

    1994

  4. [11]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands: PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05, 026 (2006)

    2006

  5. [12]

    Marchesini, B

    G. Marchesini, B. R. Webber, G. Abbiendi, I. G. Knowles, M. H. Seymour and L. Stanco: HERWIG: A Monte Carlo event generator for simulating hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons. Version 5.1 - April 1991, Comput. Phys. Commun. 67, 465-508 (1992)

    1992

  6. [13]

    T. S. Biro, P. Levai and J. Zimanyi: ALCOR: A Dynamic model for hadronization, Phys. Lett. B 347, 6-12 (1995)

    1995

  7. [14]

    Greco, C

    V. Greco, C. M. Ko and P. Levai: Parton coalescence and anti-proton / pion anomaly at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 202302 (2003)

    2003

  8. [15]

    R. J. Fries, B. Muller, C. Nonaka and S. A. Bass: Hadronization in heavy ion collisions: Recombination and fragmentation of partons, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 202303 (2003). Quark Recombination 27

    2003

  9. [16]

    R. J. Fries, V. Greco and P. Sorensen: Coalescence Models For Hadron Formation From Quark Gluon Plasma, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58, 177-205 (2008)

    2008

  10. [17]

    Altmann, A

    J. Altmann, A. Dubla, V. Greco, A. Rossi and P. Skands: Towards the understanding of heavy quarks hadronization: from leptonic to heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J.C 85, 16 (2025)

    2025

  11. [18]

    J. F. Owens: Large Momentum Transfer Production of Direct Photons, Jets, and Particles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 465 (1987)

    1987

  12. [19]

    K. P. Das and R. C. Hwa: Quark-antiquark Recombination in the Fragmentation Region, Phys. Lett. B 68, 459 (1977). [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 73, 504 (1978)]

    1977

  13. [20]

    Adamovich et al

    M. Adamovich et al. [WA82]: Study of D+ and D- Feynman’s x distributions in pi- nucleus interactions at the SPS, Phys. Lett. B 305, 402-406 (1993)

    1993

  14. [21]

    E. M. Aitala et al. [E791]: Asymmetries between the production of𝐷+ and𝐷− mesons from 500-GeV/c𝜋− - nucleon interactions as a function of𝑥𝐹 and𝑝2 𝑡 , Phys. Lett. B 371, 157-162 (1996)

    1996

  15. [22]

    Braaten, Y

    E. Braaten, Y. Jia and T. Mehen: The Leading particle effect from heavy quark recombination, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 122002 (2002)

    2002

  16. [23]

    Plumari, G

    S. Plumari, G. L. Guardo, V. Greco and J. Y. Ollitrault: Viscous corrections to anisotropic flow and transverse momentum spectra from transport theory, Nucl. Phys. A 941, 87-96 (2015)

    2015

  17. [24]

    Luzum and P

    M. Luzum and P. Romatschke: Conformal Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics: Applications to RHIC results at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV, Phys. Rev.C 78, 034915 (2008); erratum: Phys. Rev. C 79, 039903 (2009)

    2008

  18. [25]

    Rapp and E

    R. Rapp and E. V. Shuryak: D meson production from recombination in hadronic collisions, Phys. Rev.D 67, 074036 (2003)

    2003

  19. [26]

    Letessier and J

    J. Letessier and J. Rafelski: Chemical nonequilibrium and deconfinement in 200-A/GeV sulphur induced reactions Phys. Rev. C59, 947 (1999)

    1999

  20. [27]

    R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang: Scaling behavior at high p(T) and the p / pi ratio, Phys. Rev.C 67, 034902 (2003)

    2003

  21. [28]

    Greco, C

    V. Greco, C. M. Ko and P. Levai: Parton coalescence at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C 68 , 034904 (2003)

    2003

  22. [29]

    R. J. Fries, B. Muller, C. Nonaka and S. A. Bass: Hadron production in heavy ion collisions: Fragmentation and recombination from a dense parton phase, Phys. Rev.C 68, 044902 (2003)

    2003

  23. [30]

    Kordell II, R

    M. Kordell II, R. J. Fries and C. M. Ko: Angular momentum eigenstates of the isotropic 3-D harmonic oscillator: Phase-space distributions and coalescence probabilities, Annals Phys. 443, 168960 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    Molnar and S

    D. Molnar and S. A. Voloshin: Elliptic flow at large transverse momenta from quark coales- cence, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 092301 (2003)

    2003

  25. [32]

    Minissale, F

    V. Minissale, F. Scardina and V. Greco: Hadrons from coalescence plus fragmentation in AA collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider to the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. CC 92, 054904 (2015)

    2015

  26. [33]

    Greco and C

    V. Greco and C. M. Ko: Effect of resonance decays on hadron elliptic flows, Phys. Rev.C 70, 024901 (2004)

    2004

  27. [34]

    He and R

    M. He and R. Rapp: Hadronization and Charm-Hadron Ratios in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042301 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    Greco: Phase-space coalescence for heavy and light quarks at RHIC, Eur

    V. Greco: Phase-space coalescence for heavy and light quarks at RHIC, Eur. Phys. J. ST 155, 45-59 (2008)

    2008

  29. [36]

    T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, W. Cassing and E. Bratkovskaya: Charm production in Pb + Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034906 (2016)

    2016

  30. [37]

    K. C. Han, R. J. Fries and C. M. Ko: Jet Fragmentation via Recombination of Parton Showers, Phys. Rev. C93, 045207 (2016)

    2016

  31. [38]

    Ravagli and R

    L. Ravagli and R. Rapp: Quark Coalescence based on a Transport Equation, Phys. Lett. B 655, 126-131 (2007),

    2007

  32. [39]

    Ravagli, H

    L. Ravagli, H. van Hees and R. Rapp: Resonance Recombination Model: A Dynamical Framework for Hadronization, Phys. Rev.C 79, 064902 (2009)

    2009

  33. [40]

    M. He, R. J. Fries and R. Rapp: Scaling of Elliptic Flow, Recombination and Sequential Freeze-Out of Hadrons in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C82, 034907 (2010) 28 Rainer J. Fries, Vincenzo Greco and Ralf Rapp

    2010

  34. [41]

    Greco, C

    V. Greco, C. M. Ko and R. Rapp: Quark coalescence for charmed mesons in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 595, 202-208 (2004)

    2004

  35. [42]

    van Hees and R

    H. van Hees and R. Rapp: Thermalization of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C 71, 034907 (2005)

    2005

  36. [43]

    van Hees, V

    H. van Hees, V. Greco and R. Rapp: Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma at RHIC, Phys. Rev.C 73, 034913 (2006)

    2006

  37. [44]

    van Hees, M

    H. van Hees, M. Mannarelli, V. Greco and R. Rapp: Nonperturbative heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 192301 (2008)

    2008

  38. [45]

    Scardina, S

    F. Scardina, S. K. Das, V. Minissale, S. Plumari and V. Greco: Estimating the charm quark diffusion coefficient and thermalization time from D meson spectra at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.C 96, 044...

    2017

  39. [46]

    R. Rapp, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck, S. Masciocchi, A. Beraudo, E. Bratkovskaya, P. Braun-Munzinger, S. Cao and A. Dainese, et al.: Extraction of Heavy- Flavor Transport Coefficients in QCD Matter, Nucl. Phys.A 979, 21-86 (2018)

    2018

  40. [47]

    J. Zhao, J. Aichelin, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Beraudo, S. Cao, W. Fan, M. He, V. Minissale, T. Song and I. Vitev, et al.: Hadronization of heavy quarks, Phys. Rev.C 109, 054912 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Y. Oh, C. M. Ko, S. H. Lee and S. Yasui: Heavy baryon/meson ratios in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev.C 79, 044905 (2009)

    2009

  42. [49]

    Plumari, V

    S. Plumari, V. Minissale, S. K. Das, G. Coci and V. Greco: Charmed Hadrons from Coalescence plus Fragmentation in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC and LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 348 (2018)

    2018

  43. [50]

    S. Cao, K. J. Sun, S. Q. Li, S. Y. F. Liu, W. J. Xing, G. Y. Qin and C. M. Ko: Charmed hadron chemistry in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 807, 135561 (2020)

    2020

  44. [51]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. [STAR]: First measurement of Λ𝑐 baryon production in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠NN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 172301 (2020)

    2020

  45. [52]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: Constraining hadronization mechanisms withΛc+/D0 production ratios in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett.B 839, 137796 (2023)

    2023

  46. [53]

    Beraudo, A

    A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, M. Monteno, M. Nardi and F. Prino: In-medium hadronization of heavy quarks and its effect on charmed meson and baryon distributions in heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 607 (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    Beraudo, A

    A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, D. Pablos, F. Prino, M. Monteno and M. Nardi: Heavy-flavor transport and hadronization in pp collisions, Phys. Rev.D 109, L011501 (2024)

    2024

  48. [55]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: Measurement of Prompt D 0,Λ+ 𝑐, andΣ0,++ 𝑐 (2455) Production in Proton–Proton Collisions at√𝑠 = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 012001 (2022)

    2022

  49. [56]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: First measurement of Λc+ production down to pT=0 in pp and p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev.C 107, 064901 (2023)

    2023

  50. [57]

    Skands, S

    P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo: Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3024 (2014)

    2014

  51. [58]

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke: One fluid to rule them all: viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at √𝑠 = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351-356 (2017)

    2017

  52. [59]

    He and R

    M. He and R. Rapp: Charm-Baryon Production in Proton-Proton Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 795, 117-121 (2019)

    2019

  53. [60]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group]: Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev.D 98, 030001 (2018)

    2018

  54. [61]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel: Charmonium and open charm production in nuclear collisions at SPS/FAIR energies and the possible influence of a hot hadronic medium, Phys. Lett. B 659, 149-155 (2008)

    2008

  55. [62]

    Ebert, R

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin: Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Rev.D 84, 014025 (2011)

    2011

  56. [63]

    Padmanath, R

    M. Padmanath, R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur and M. J. Peardon: Spectroscopy of charmed baryons from lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2014, 084 (2015)

    2015

  57. [64]

    Chen and M

    Y. Chen and M. He: Charged-particle multiplicity dependence of charm-baryon-to-meson ratio in high-energy proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 815, 136144 (2021). Quark Recombination 29

    2021

  58. [65]

    J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands: String Formation Beyond Leading Colour, JHEP 08, 003 (2015)

    2015

  59. [66]

    J. Zhao, J. Aichelin, P. B. Gossiaux and K. Werner: Heavy flavor as a probe of hot QCD matter produced in proton-proton collisions, Phys. Rev.D 109, 054011 (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    J. Zhao, J. Aichelin, P. B. Gossiaux, V. Ozvenchuk and K. Werner: Heavy-flavor hadron production in relativistic heavy ion collisions at energies available at BNL RHIC and at the CERN LHC in the EPOS4HQ framework, Phys. Rev.C 110, 024909 (2024)

    2024

  61. [68]

    Minissale, S

    V. Minissale, S. Plumari, Y. Sun and V. Greco: Multi-charmed and singled charmed hadrons from coalescence: yields and ratios in different collision systems at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 228 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS]: Studies of charm and beauty hadron long-range correlations in pp and pPb collisions at LHC energies, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136036 (2021)

    2021

  63. [70]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS]: Measurement of azimuthal anisotropy of muons from charm and bottom hadrons in 𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠 = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 082301 (2020)

    2020

  64. [71]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS]: Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high- multiplicity pPb collisions at √𝑠NN = 8.16 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.8, 082301 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.082301

    2018 doi

  65. [72]

    Minissale, V

    V. Minissale, V. Greco and S. Plumari: Bottomed mesons and baryons production in pp collisions at s=5 TeV LHC energy within a Coalescence plus Fragmentation approach, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139190 (2025)

    2025

  66. [73]

    He and R

    M. He and R. Rapp: Bottom Hadrochemistry in High-Energy Hadronic Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 1 (2023)

    2023

  67. [74]

    Minissale, S

    V. Minissale, S. Plumari and V. Greco: Charm hadrons in pp collisions at LHC energy within a coalescence plus fragmentation approach, Phys. Lett. B 821, 136622 (2021)

    2021

  68. [75]

    J. Song, H. h. Li and F. l. Shao: New feature of low 𝑝𝑇 charm quark hadronization in 𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. CC 78, 344 (2018)

    2018

  69. [76]

    Aaij et al.[LHCb]: Enhanced Production ofΛb0 Baryons in High-Multiplicity pp Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys

    R. Aaij et al.[LHCb]: Enhanced Production ofΛb0 Baryons in High-Multiplicity pp Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 081901 (2024)

    2024

  70. [77]

    Seife: Wayward Particles Collide With Physicists’ Expectations, Science 298, 718-719 (2002)

    Ch. Seife: Wayward Particles Collide With Physicists’ Expectations, Science 298, 718-719 (2002)

    2002

  71. [78]

    S. S. Adler et al. [PHENIX]: Identified charged particle spectra and yields in Au+Au collisions at S(NN)**1/2 = 200-GeV, Phys. Rev.C 69, 034909 (2004)

    2004

  72. [79]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 813 (2024)

    2024

  73. [80]

    S. H. Lee, K. Ohnishi, S. Yasui, I. K. Yoo and C. M. Ko: Lambda(c) enhancement from strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 222301 (2008)

    2008

  74. [81]

    Cho et al

    S. Cho et al. [ExHIC]: Multi-quark hadrons from Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 212001 (2011)

    2011

  75. [82]

    R. q. Wang, F. l. Shao, J. Song, Q. b. Xie and Z. t. Liang: Hadron Yield Correlation in Combination Models in High Energy AA Collisions, Phys. Rev.C 86, 054906 (2012)

    2012

  76. [83]

    S. Cao, G. Y. Qin and S. A. Bass: Heavy-quark dynamics and hadronization in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions: Collisional versus radiative energy loss, Phys. Rev.C 88, 044907 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR]: Elliptic flow of identified hadrons in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 = 7.7-62.4 GeV, Phys. Rev.C 88, 014902 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    Pratt and S

    S. Pratt and S. Pal: Quark recombination and elliptic flow, Phys. Rev. C 71, 014905 (2005)

    2005

  79. [87]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE Collaboration]: Measurement of D0, D+, D∗+ and D+ 𝑠 production in Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN= 5.02 TeV, JHEP1810, 174 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS Collaboration]: Measurement of prompt D 0 and D0 meson azimuthal anisotropy and search for strong electric fields in PbPb collisions at √𝑠NN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett.B 816, 136253 (2021). 30 Rainer J. Fries, Vincenzo Greco and Ralf Rapp

    2021

  81. [89]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS Collaboration]: Measurement of prompt 𝐷0 meson azimuthal anisotropy in Pb-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 202301 (2018). [90]

    2018

  82. [90]

    S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari and V. Greco: Toward a solution to the𝑅𝐴𝐴 and𝑣2 puzzle for heavy quarks, Phys. Lett. B 747, 260-264 (2015)

    2015

  83. [91]

    Adare et al

    A. Adare et al. [PHENIX]: Energy Loss and Flow of Heavy Quarks in Au+Au Collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 172301 (2007)

    2007

  84. [92]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: Prompt D0, D+, and D∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP01, 174 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. [STAR]: Observation of𝐷± 𝑠/𝐷0 enhancement in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 092301 (2021)

    2021

  86. [94]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: Measurement of prompt 𝐷+ 𝑠 -meson production and azimuthal anisotropy in Pb–Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 =5.02TeV, Phys. Lett.B 827, 136986 (2022)

    2022

  87. [95]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel: Statistical hadronization of charm in heavy ion collisions at SPS, RHIC and LHC, Phys. Lett. B 571, 36-44 (2003)

    2003

  88. [96]

    Kuznetsova and J

    I. Kuznetsova and J. Rafelski: Heavy flavor hadrons in statistical hadronization of strangeness- rich QGP, Eur. Phys. J.C 51, 113-133 (2007)

    2007

  89. [97]

    M. He, R. J. Fries and R. Rapp: Ds-Meson as Quantitative Probe of Diffusion and Hadroniza- tion in Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 112301 (2013)

    2013

  90. [98]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. K. K ¨ohler, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Redlich, J. Stachel and V. Vislavicius: The multiple-charm hierarchy in the statistical hadronization model, JHEP07, 035 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter and J. Rafelski: Enhanced 𝐽/𝜓 production in deconfined quark matter, Phys. Rev.C 63, 054905 (2001)

    2001

  92. [100]

    Grandchamp, R

    L. Grandchamp, R. Rapp and G. E. Brown: In medium effects on charmonium production in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 212301 (2004)

    2004

  93. [101]

    Grandchamp, S

    L. Grandchamp, S. Lumpkins, D. Sun, H. van Hees and R. Rapp: Bottomonium production at RHIC and CERN LHC, Phys. Rev.C 73, 064906 (2006)

    2006

  94. [102]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. B. Gossiaux, P. Petreczky, R. Rapp, M. Strickland, J. P. Blaizot, N. Brambilla, P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Chen and S. Delorme, et al. : Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 88 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    Wu and R

    B. Wu and R. Rapp: Charmonium Transport in Heavy-Ion Collisions at the LHC: Universe 10, 244 (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    Riek and R

    F. Riek and R. Rapp: Quarkonia and Heavy-Quark Relaxation Times in the Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev.C 82, 035201 (2010)

    2010

  97. [105]

    Du and R

    X. Du and R. Rapp: Sequential Regeneration of Charmonia in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Nucl. Phys. A A 943, 147-158 (2015)

    2015

  98. [106]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel: Statistical hadronization of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 789 , 334-356 (2007)

    2007

  99. [107]

    Andronic and R

    A. Andronic and R. Arnaldi: Quarkonia and Deconfined Quark-Gluon Matter in Heavy-Ion Collisions, preprint arXiv:2501.08290 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE]: 𝜓(2S) Suppression in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 042301 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Andronic, F

    A. Andronic, F. Arleo, R. Arnaldi, A. Beraudo, E. Bruna, D. Caffarri, Z. Conesa del Valle, J. G. Contreras, T. Dahms and A. Dainese, et al.: Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J.C 76, 107 (2016)

    2016

  102. [110]

    Grandchamp and R

    L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp: Charmonium suppression and regeneration from SPS to RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A A 709, 415-439 (2002)

    2002

  103. [111]

    T. Song, K. C. Han and C. M. Ko: Charmonium production from nonequilibrium charm and anticharm quarks in quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev.C 85, 054905 (2012)

    2012

  104. [112]

    Chen and J

    B. Chen and J. Zhao: Bottomonium Continuous Production from Unequilibrium Bottom Quarks in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 772, 819-824 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Yao and T

    X. Yao and T. Mehen: Quarkonium Semiclassical Transport in Quark-Gluon Plasma: Factor- ization and Quantum Correction, JHEP 02, 062 (2021). Quark Recombination 31

    2021

  106. [114]

    Du and R

    X. Du and R. Rapp: Non-equilibrium charmonium regeneration in strongly coupled quark- gluon plasma, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137414 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    M. He, H. van Hees and R. Rapp: Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark–gluon plasma, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130, 104020 (2023)

    2023

  108. [116]

    Katz and P

    R. Katz and P. B. Gossiaux: The Schr ¨odinger–Langevin equation with and without thermal fluctuations, Annals Phys. 368, 267-295 (2016)

    2016

  109. [117]

    Yao and T

    X. Yao and T. Mehen: Quarkonium in-medium transport equation derived from first principles, Phys. Rev.D 99, 096028 (2019)

    2019

  110. [118]

    Akamatsu: Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re- examined, Prog

    Y. Akamatsu: Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re- examined, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 123, 103932 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    Brambilla, M

    N. Brambilla, M. ´A. Escobedo, A. Islam, M. Strickland, A. Tiwari, A. Vairo and P. Vander Griend: Regeneration of bottomonia in an open quantum systems approach, Phys. Rev.D 108, L011502 (2023)

    2023

  112. [120]

    Z. Tang, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky and R. Rapp: T-matrix analysis of static Wilson line correlators from lattice QCD at finite temperature, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 92 (2024)

    2024

  113. [121]

    Schroedter, R

    M. Schroedter, R. L. Thews and J. Rafelski: 𝐵𝑐 meson production in nuclear collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev.C 62, 024905 (2000)

    2000

  114. [122]

    Y. Liu, C. Greiner and A. Kostyuk: 𝐵𝑐 meson enhancement and the momentum dependence in Pb + Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C C 87, 014910 (2013)

    2013

  115. [123]

    X. Du, M. He and R. Rapp: Color Screening and Regeneration of Bottomonia in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev.C 96, 054901 (2017)

    2017

  116. [124]

    B. Wu, Z. Tang, M. He and R. Rapp: Recombination of𝐵𝑐 mesons in ultrarelativistic heavy- ion collisions, Phys. Rev.C 109, 014906 (2024)

    2024

  117. [125]

    Tumasyan et al

    A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS]: Observation of the 𝐵+ 𝑐 Meson in Pb-Pb and pp Collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 =5.02 TeV and Measurement of its Nuclear Modification Factor, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 252301 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.