Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 9 cited by

Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: testing a new beyond-$\Lambda$CDM parameter with cosmological data

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A population of timelike boundaries adds a negative 1/a vacuum term to cosmic expansion, and Planck+ACT+DESI data prefer it at about 1.8 sigma.

desk verdict A careful, honest data analysis of a genuinely new physical scenario whose central theoretical link — from boundary-layer stress energy to a homogeneous w=-2/3 fluid — is still a leap; worth refereeing, not yet a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00115 v3 pith:CNYXUAV3 submitted 2025-06-30 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Oliver H. E. Philcox , Eva Silverstein , Gonzalo Torroba This is my paper
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords cosmictopologytimelikeboundariesquantumvacuumenergyFriedmannequationbaryonacousticoscillationsneutrinomassmicrowavebackgrounddark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a population of timelike boundaries—surfaces where spacetime simply ends—accumulates quantum vacuum energy that can be negative and large, and that under fixed-comoving-size boundary conditions this adds a new term $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{bdy}}/a$ to the Friedmann equation. Because it scales as $1/a$, the term matters at relatively late times ($a\approx1/2$) and leaves early-universe physics like big bang nucleosynthesis and recombination untouched. Combining Planck, ACT, and DESI data, the authors find a $\sim1.8\sigma$ preference for $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.059\pm0.039$ (with $\Delta\chi^2=-2.8$ relative to $\Lambda$CDM), and the neutrino-mass bound relaxes from $\sum m_\nu\le0.061$ eV to $\le0.098$ eV at 95% CL. If correct, the universe would contain a small negative vacuum-energy component whose origin is spacetime topology rather than a new field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the boundary layer of quantum stress energy $\langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle$ near a timelike wall, whose vacuum-fluctuation contribution diverges as $T^{(4)}_{\mu\nu}/\Delta x_\perp^4+\cdots$ and is UV sensitive; for suitable boundary conditions (Dirichlet-type, fixed comoving size) the integrated energy is negative and scales as $-1/a$ in the Friedmann equation. The calculation uses heat-kernel expansion of the density of states to get the renormalized wall energy from zero-point mode sums. It is this $1/a$ scaling—distinct from matter ($a^{-3}$), radiation ($a^{-4}$), or a cosmological constant—that makes the term dominate at intermediate redshifts and leaves early-universe physics intact.

What would settle it

Measure the expansion history at $z\simeq0.3$–$1$ with a method independent of the CMB acoustic scale—for example, BAO with a directly calibrated sound horizon or high-redshift type Ia supernovae. With $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.1$ the model predicts the distance to $z=0.53$ is 0.9% larger than flat $\Lambda$CDM (fixing early-universe parameters), so a high-precision measurement excluding that 0.9% excess would falsify the boundary component.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that nontrivial spacetime topology—specifically a homogeneous population of spherical timelike boundaries with fixed comoving size—produces a negative, UV-sensitive quantum stress-energy layer that enters the Friedmann equation as $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{bdy}}/a$ (with $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{bdy}}<0$). In the coarse-grained FRW approximation this is a new background component, not a perturbation source; the paper asserts it is a viable phenomenological scenario for which a wide parameter window keeps boundaries super-Planckian from the start of inflation onward. Comparing to Planck (PR3/PR4), ACT DR6, Planck/ACT lensing, and DESI DR2 BAO, the paper finds the data prefer $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.059\pm0.039$ (1.8$\sigma$ below zero), with $\Delta\chi^2=-2.8$ versus $\Lambda$CDM, and that the $\sum m_\nu\le0.061$ eV bound relaxes to $\le0.098$ eV at 95% CL. The paper does not claim to solve the full quantum-gravity problem of timelike boundaries; it treats the boundary population phenomenologically while citing recent work on spherical-boundary consistency.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scenario rests on the unproven premise that consistent quantum gravity allows a stable population of timelike spherical boundaries whose comoving size is fixed, and that their negative quantum stress energy can be coarse-grained into a homogeneous fluid without destabilizing the FRW background; the paper explicitly says it does not solve this general quantum gravity problem (Section 2).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A negative $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}$ reduces the expansion rate at intermediate redshifts; for $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.1$ the distance to $z=0.53$ is 0.9% larger than flat $\Lambda$CDM, and the distance to the CMB is 0.7% larger.
  • The neutrino-mass upper limit relaxes from $\sum m_\nu\le0.061$ eV in $\Lambda$CDM to $\le0.098$ eV with boundaries, removing the tension with the minimum mass expected from solar neutrino oscillations.
  • A negative $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}$ slightly increases clustering: $\sigma_8$ rises by about 1% for $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.1$, with a corresponding 2.2% excess in CMB lensing power at $L=50$.
  • The boundary component leaves BBN, recombination, and the primordial curvature spectrum essentially unchanged, so early-universe constraints do not exclude the scenario.
  • For a wide window of parameters the boundaries remain larger than the Planck length throughout their history, back through the start of inflation at any viable scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{bdy}}/a$ term is real, it is formally equivalent to a negative dark-energy component with equation of state $w=-2/3$, so part of what DESI sees as dynamical dark energy could be a topological vacuum effect rather than a rolling scalar field.
  • Editorial inference: The preference is set mainly by the CMB likelihood, not by the BAO points themselves, so adding low-redshift supernova distances (which the paper deliberately omits due to calibration concerns) is a direct, near-term test; if the preference persists, the boundary interpretation gains support.
  • Editorial inference: The same $-1/a$ scaling can be searched for in the growth rate: since $\sigma_8$ rises by about 1% for $\Omega_{\mathrm{bdy}}=-0.1$, redshift-space-distortion measurements at $z\sim0.5$ could distinguish the boundary component from a smooth dark energy with the same expansion history.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a cosmological population of timelike spherical boundaries with fixed comoving size contributes a new component to the Friedmann equation, ρ_bdy ∝ a^{-1} (Eq. 1.1), sourced by boundary-layer vacuum fluctuations with possibly negative energy. The authors estimate the required parameter window (§3), check that the component can avoid disrupting inflation, BBN, and recombination (§4), implement the model in camb as a homogeneous fluid with density ∝ a^{-1} and no perturbations (§5.1), and analyze Planck PR3/PR4, ACT DR6, Planck lensing, and DESI DR2 BAO data (§5.2). They report a weak preference, Ω_bdy = -0.059 ± 0.039 (1.8σ), Δχ² = -2.8 relative to ΛCDM, and a relaxed neutrino-mass upper limit (Σmν ≤ 0.098 eV at 95% CL with Ω_bdy ≤ 0). The paper is explicit that the full quantum-gravity problem of timelike boundaries is not solved.

Significance. If the central fluid approximation can be established, the paper would be a significant contribution: it identifies a distinctive, falsifiable beyond-ΛCDM parameter with a non-standard a^{-1} scaling, connects it to spacetime topology and negative vacuum energy, and tests it with current data using public likelihoods and a transparent MCMC setup. The data analysis is reproducible in structure and honestly reported as a weak preference rather than a detection; the robustness checks across Planck, ACT, and DESI and across lensing choices add value. The main value at present is the phenomenological framework and the necessary-condition checks in §4, not an observational claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.2); §3, Eqs. (3.2)–(3.4); §5.1] The central relation (1.1) is asserted rather than derived. The microphysical input is a divergent wall stress tensor with several competing terms (Eq. 2.2), and §3 reduces this to a total energy per boundary E_bdy ~ A_bdy M_UV^3 (Eq. 3.3). No step in §2, §3, or Appendix A computes the coarse-grained, spatially averaged stress tensor of a dilute random population of spherical boundaries; the full ⟨T_μν⟩ near a wall is anisotropic (radial versus tangential pressures differ), and energy conservation forces p = -2/3 ρ only for a perfect, non-interacting fluid. In addition, a fixed-comoving spherical worldtube has a prescribed extrinsic curvature, and the boundary-layer stress must satisfy the Israel junction conditions; no such consistency check appears. Until this is supplied, Ω_bdy should be regarded as a free parameter of a phenomenological fluid rather than a derived property of boundaries. Relatedly, the a^{-1} scaling assumes that the boundary-layer thickness is fixed by a proper UV cutoff; if the cutoff is comoving, the scaling of ρ_bdy with a changes.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.12)–(A.13); §5.2] The theory does not uniquely predict the sign of the boundary energy. Appendix A shows that Dirichlet and Robin conditions give opposite signs at order M_UV^3 (Eq. A.12), and that the M_UV^2 term changes sign with the sign of the extrinsic curvature (Eq. A.13); §2 also states that different boundary conditions give different signs. The data analysis, however, imposes or prefers Ω_bdy < 0, and the abstract emphasizes negative energy. No argument is given that the boundary conditions that realize fixed comoving size select the negative sign. The reported 1.8σ preference therefore constrains a sign choice made from a family of possibilities, not a sign predicted by the scenario.
  3. [§2; §6; Abstract] The paper explicitly disclaims a solution to the general quantum gravity problem of timelike boundaries and cites linearized instabilities for Dirichlet walls [31,35], so the existence and stability of the fixed-comoving boundary population is an assumption, not a result. Because this assumption is load-bearing for the abstract's and §6's interpretation of the data preference as evidence for spacetime topology, the paper should state clearly—preferably in the abstract—that the cosmological constraints apply to a phenomenological a^{-1} component, and that the topological interpretation is conditional on a class of boundary conditions whose dynamical realization is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.2, Fig. 6] The sum of neutrino masses is typeset as 'P mν' (e.g., 'P mν ≤ 0.098 eV'); it should be Σmν.
  2. [§3, footnote 2] Footnote 2 says §5 will find a '10% contribution from boundaries', but the reported best fit is about -7% (Ω_bdy = -0.059); please make the numbers consistent.
  3. [§1 and Fig. 2 caption] The Introduction contains a typo, 'vaious linearized instabilities' (p. 2), and the Fig. 2 caption refers to 'fourth panels' (plural) where 'fourth panel' is meant.
  4. [§5.1] The statement that the boundaries 'do not contribute to the Einstein equations at leading order, except through changes to the background expansion' is confusing, since a background expansion change is itself a leading-order contribution; rephrase to clarify that the fluid is treated as homogeneous and unperturbed.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract's 'relaxation of current tensions ... in a physical manner' overstates the strength of the result: with Δχ² = -2.8 for one additional parameter and a 1.8σ significance, the preference is weak, and Fig. 4 shows the BAO fit is essentially unchanged; consider tempering the wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 1/a term follows from stated geometric and QFT assumptions, and the negative Ω_bdy preference is a free-parameter fit against independent external likelihoods.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a population of fixed-comoving timelike boundaries sources a Friedmann term ρ_bdy/a. This scaling is not imposed by definition of the fitted parameter; it is derived in §3 by combining the QFT energy-per-boundary estimates (E_bdy ∝ A_bdy M^3, from Appendix A heat-kernel coefficients) with the geometric scalings of a fixed-comoving boundary in an FRW background (proper area ∝ a^2, number density ∝ a^{-3}), yielding ρ_bdy ∝ a^{-1}. The coefficient Ω_bdy is then left free, with a uniform prior [-0.5, 0.5], and constrained by independent Planck, ACT, and DESI likelihoods; the negative best fit is a data result, not an input. The sign is not uniquely predicted: Appendix A explicitly shows that Robin boundary conditions contain a low-energy parameter S that can change the sign of the wall energy, and the data analysis permits both signs. The consistency citations for spherical Dirichlet boundaries ([34], [40]) are authored outside the present paper; self-citations ([45]-[47], [53]) appear only as motivational remarks about dS holography and do not carry the Friedmann-equation or likelihood argument. No equation is defined in terms of the target result and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The model is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed existence and stability of timelike boundaries with fixed comoving size, on the QFT heat-kernel treatment of their vacuum energy, and on a homogeneous coarse-graining. Omega_bdy is fitted to data; the UV scale, boundary radius, and abundance are free parameters of the model. No entirely new particle or force is introduced, but the boundaries themselves are a new postulated cosmological ingredient.

free parameters (4)
  • Omega_bdy (boundary fractional energy density today) = -0.059 +/- 0.039 (Planck+DESI); -0.065 +/- 0.034 with Omega_bdy <= 0
    Central extension parameter; uniform prior in [-0.5, 0.5]; fitted to CMB and BAO data.
  • M_UV (UV cutoff scale)
    Free scale controlling the magnitude of the boundary energy; chosen so that boundaries stay above the Planck length and EFT remains controlled.
  • r_bdy,0 (current proper boundary radius) = Range roughly 10^-15 m to 10^19 m
    Free parameter; sets scattering cross-sections and consistency with BBN and recombination; not fitted to data.
  • N_bdy (number of boundaries in units of H0^3)
    Free abundance parameter; must satisfy homogeneity and volume-fraction bounds in Eqs. (3.4)-(3.8); not fitted directly.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Consistent classical gravity with timelike Dirichlet spherical boundaries is well-posed.
    Relied on in Section 2; cited to the literature (e.g., [34,40]); the paper explicitly does not prove this and treats the scenario phenomenologically.
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary conditions fix the comoving boundary size.
    Introduced in Sections 1 and 2 as 'any boundary condition which yields fixed comoving size boundaries'; this is the crucial assumption producing the 1/a scaling.
  • standard math Quantum vacuum stress-energy near boundaries follows the heat-kernel/de Witt-Schwinger expansion with a local cutoff M_UV.
    Used in Appendix A and Section 3, drawn from Deutsch-Candelas and Vassilevich; standard QFT in curved spacetime.
  • domain assumption The boundary population is homogeneous and affects the universe only through the background Friedmann term, with no perturbations and negligible scattering at BBN and recombination.
    Stated in Section 5.1 ('delta-rho_bdy = 0') and checked in Section 4.2; required for the fluid approximation to hold.
invented entities (1)
  • Population of timelike spherical boundaries with fixed comoving size independent evidence
    purpose: Source of negative, a^{-1}-scaling vacuum energy that can compete with matter and dark energy and relax cosmological tensions.
    The model gives falsifiable handles not used in the fit: localized CMB distortions from reflection off boundaries, non-Gaussian LSS signatures, and modified growth/distance relations already constrained by the data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: testing a new beyond-$\Lambda$CDM parameter with cosmological data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNYXUAV3

@misc{pith2026250700115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: testing a new beyond-$\Lambda$CDM parameter with cosmological data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNYXUAV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00115}
}
abstract

We analyze the basic cosmological effects of a population of timelike boundaries -- a form of nontrivial spacetime topology -- containing a boundary layer of quantum stress energy. This accumulation of vacuum fluctuations of quantum fields can be consistently negative and UV sensitive, providing an additional source of cosmic energy density strong enough to compete with matter and dark energy. For boundary conditions enabling a solution with fixed comoving boundary size, this effect contributes a qualitatively new term to the Friedmann equation determining the expansion history, scaling like $-1/a$ for scale factor $a$. It naturally dominates at relatively late times ($a\approx1/2$), while leaving intact well-measured early universe physics such as big bang nucleosynthesis and recombination. For a wide window of parameters, the boundaries can be larger than the Planck length throughout their history, back through the start of inflation at any viable scale. We analyze CMB and BAO data sets (Planck, ACT, and DESI) allowing for this component, finding a slight preference ($\sim 2\sigma$) and a relaxation of current tensions in the data (including the neutrino mass) in a physical manner. This novel parameter fits into a larger space of physical parameters beyond-$\Lambda$CDM that may serve this role, including negative spatial curvature, which may also be motivated by topological considerations and chaotic dynamics. Finally, we comment on additional phenomenological prospects for testing for this form of topology in the universe.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dirichlet walls and the end of time

    hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Generic Dirichlet-wall spacetimes can end in finite-time spacelike singularities at the wall, including walls that fall into BTZ black holes.

  2. JT gravity on the worldline

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Coupling a worldline observer to JT gravity replaces its evolution operator by an exactly computed average over fluctuating Euclidean times; the fluctuations are small in the disk but large on the double trumpet.

  3. The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A constrained product of two dressed one-sided dS quantum systems yields a holographic dual whose top-band TFD and lower tall states capture the future wedge and overlapping causal wedges.

  4. Observers, local measurements, and topology

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Measurement correlations along an observer's worldline define a simplicial complex whose homology is proposed to be the topology of the accessible quantum-gravitational spacetime.

  5. The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using two timelike boundaries and a nearly maximally entangled thermofield double state from dressed de Sitter Hamiltonian theories, the authors construct wavefunctions for extended cosmological spacetimes that includ...

  6. Diamonds in the Bulk and Large-$N$ Scaling in AdS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bulk field algebras of causal diamonds in AdS/CFT require a double-scaling limit, so sub-AdS-radius distances are not described by bulk QFT.

  7. Inflation, Open Universes, and Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A slightly open universe with Ω_k ≈ 3×10^{-3} pulls n_s down to ~0.969, reconciling plateau inflation models with combined CMB and DESI data.

  8. Dirichlet walls and the end of time

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dirichlet walls in Einstein gravity allow open sets of initial data to evolve until singularities reach the boundary in finite time.

  9. Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 2. Constraints on Dark Energy, Spatial Curvature, and Neutrino Masses

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reanalysis of DESI full-shape clustering data tightens constraints on neutrino mass, spatial curvature, and dark energy equation-of-state parameters relative to BAO-only results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J.R. Bond, D. Pogosian and T. Souradeep, CMB anisotropy in compact hyperbolic universes. 2. COBE maps and limits , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043006 [ astro-ph/9912144]

    arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    Cornish, D.N

    N.J. Cornish, D.N. Spergel, G.D. Starkman and E. Komatsu, Constraining the topology of the universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 201302 [ astro-ph/0310233]

    arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    COMPACT collaboration, Promise of Future Searches for Cosmic Topology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 171501 [ 2210.11426]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Deutsch and P

    D. Deutsch and P. Candelas, Boundary Effects in Quantum Field Theory , Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 3063

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021 [ 2404.03002]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    DESI collaboration, DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, 2503.14738

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    DESI collaboration, Cosmological implications of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data , 2504.18464

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    DESI collaboration, Dynamical Dark Energy in light of the DESI DR2 Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations Measurements, 2504.06118

    arXiv

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    DESI collaboration, Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements , 2503.14743

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    DESI collaboration, Cosmological constraints on dark energy parametrizations after DESI 2024: Persistent deviation from standard ΛCDM cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 083547 [ 2407.09767]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    DESI collaboration, DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 023532 [ 2405.13588]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Shlivko and P.J

    D. Shlivko and P.J. Steinhardt, Assessing observational constraints on dark energy , Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138826 [ 2405.03933]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Cortˆ es and A.R

    M. Cortˆ es and A.R. Liddle,On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM, 2504.15336

  6. [14]

    W.J. Wolf, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, T. Anton and P.G. Ferreira,Assessing cosmological evidence for non-minimal coupling, 2504.07679

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ωm Tension or Systematics?, 2412.12905

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chen and M

    S.-F. Chen and M. Zaldarriaga, It’s All Ok: Curvature in Light of BAO from DESI DR2 , 2505.00659

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Thurston, Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol

    W.P. Thurston, Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol. 1 , vol. 35 of Princeton Mathematical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1997)

    1997

  10. [18]

    Maher, Random Heegaard splittings, arXiv e-prints (2008) arXiv:0809.4881 [ 0809.4881]

    J. Maher, Random Heegaard splittings, arXiv e-prints (2008) arXiv:0809.4881 [ 0809.4881]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Cornish, D.N

    N.J. Cornish, D.N. Spergel and G.D. Starkman, Does chaotic mixing facilitate Omega < 1 inflation? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 215 [ astro-ph/9601034]

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Linde, Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe , JCAP 10 (2004) 004 [hep-th/0408164]

    A.D. Linde, Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe , JCAP 10 (2004) 004 [hep-th/0408164]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chernov and R

    N. Chernov and R. Markarian, Chaotic Billiards , vol. 127 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Craig, D

    N. Craig, D. Green, J. Meyers and S. Rajendran, No νs is Good News , JHEP 09 (2024) 097 [2405.00836]. – 21 –

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Green and J

    D. Green and J. Meyers, Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 083507 [ 2407.07878]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lynch and L

    G.P. Lynch and L. Knox, What’s the matter with Σmν ?, 2503.14470

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dark forces gathering

    P.W. Graham, D. Green and J. Meyers, “Dark forces gathering.” 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Flauger, M

    R. Flauger, M. Mirbabayi, L. Senatore and E. Silverstein, Productive Interactions: heavy particles and non-Gaussianity, JCAP 10 (2017) 058 [ 1606.00513]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M¨ unchmeyer and K.M

    M. M¨ unchmeyer and K.M. Smith,Higher N-point function data analysis techniques for heavy particle production and WMAP results , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123511 [ 1910.00596]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Philcox, S

    O.H.E. Philcox, S. Kumar and J.C. Hill, Searching for inflationary particle production in Planck data , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 103523 [ 2405.03738]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Anderson, Dehn filling and Einstein metrics in higher dimensions , J

    M.T. Anderson, Dehn filling and Einstein metrics in higher dimensions , J. Diff. Geom. 73 (2006) 219 [math/0303260]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    An and M.T

    Z. An and M.T. Anderson, The initial boundary value problem and quasi-local Hamiltonians in General Relativity, 2103.15673

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Andrade, W.R

    T. Andrade, W.R. Kelly, D. Marolf and J.E. Santos, On the stability of gravity with Dirichlet walls , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 235006 [ 1504.07580]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Marolf and M

    D. Marolf and M. Rangamani, Causality and the AdS Dirichlet problem , JHEP 04 (2012) 035 [1201.1233]

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Witten, A note on boundary conditions in Euclidean gravity , Rev

    E. Witten, A note on boundary conditions in Euclidean gravity , Rev. Math. Phys. 33 (2021) 2140004 [1805.11559]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Anninos, D.A

    D. Anninos, D.A. Galante and C. Maneerat, Gravitational observatories, JHEP 12 (2023) 024 [2310.08648]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Anninos, D.A

    D. Anninos, D.A. Galante and C. Maneerat, Cosmological Observatories, 2402.04305

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Liu, J.E

    X. Liu, J.E. Santos and T. Wiseman, New Well-Posed Boundary Conditions for Semi-Classical Euclidean Gravity, 2402.04308

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Liu, H.S

    X. Liu, H.S. Reall, J.E. Santos and T. Wiseman, Ill-posedness of the Cauchy problem for linearized gravity in a cavity with conformal boundary conditions , 2505.20410

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Fournodavlos and J

    G. Fournodavlos and J. Smulevici, The Initial Boundary Value Problem in General Relativity: The Umbilic Case , Int. Math. Res. Not. 2023 (2023) 3790 [ 2104.08851]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fournodavlos and J

    G. Fournodavlos and J. Smulevici, The Initial Boundary Value Problem for the Einstein Equations with Totally Geodesic Timelike Boundary , Commun. Math. Phys. 385 (2021) 1615 [ 2006.01498]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    An and M.T

    Z. An and M.T. Anderson, Well-posed geometric boundary data in General Relativity, II: Dirichlet boundary data, 2505.07128

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Banihashemi, T

    B. Banihashemi, T. Jacobson, A. Svesko and M. Visser, The minus sign in the first law of de Sitter horizons, 2208.11706

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Banihashemi and T

    B. Banihashemi and T. Jacobson, Thermodynamic ensembles with cosmological horizons , JHEP 07 (2022) 042 [ 2204.05324]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y.T.A. Law and Z. Sun, Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions , 2009.12464

    2009 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738. – 22 –

    1977

  37. [45]

    Coleman, E.A

    E. Coleman, E.A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R.M. Soni, G. Torroba et al., De Sitter microstates from TT + Λ2 and the Hawking-Page transition , JHEP 07 (2022) 140 [ 2110.14670]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Batra, G.B

    G. Batra, G.B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, G. Torroba and S. Yang, Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter with T T + Λ2, JHEP 10 (2024) 072 [ 2403.01040]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Silverstein and G

    E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, Timelike-bounded dS4 holography from a solvable sector of the T 2 deformation, JHEP 03 (2025) 156 [ 2409.08709]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Hartman, J

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation, 1807.11401

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Levine and E

    A. Levine and E. Shaghoulian, Encoding beyond cosmological horizons in de sitter jt gravity , Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Batra, Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem , JHEP 01 (2025) 044 [2407.08913]

    G. Batra, Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem , JHEP 01 (2025) 044 [2407.08913]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ahmadain and R

    A. Ahmadain and R. Khan, A Worldsheet Derivation of the Classical Off-shell Boundary Action for the Dilaton in Half-Space , 2406.00712

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ahmadain, S

    A. Ahmadain, S. Akhtar and R. Khan, The GHY boundary term from the string worldsheet to linear order, 2411.06400

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Silverstein, Black hole to cosmic horizon microstates in string/M theory: timelike boundaries and internal averaging, JHEP 05 (2023) 160 [ 2212.00588]

    E. Silverstein, Black hole to cosmic horizon microstates in string/M theory: timelike boundaries and internal averaging, JHEP 05 (2023) 160 [ 2212.00588]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Anderson, On boundary value problems for Einstein metrics , Geom

    M.T. Anderson, On boundary value problems for Einstein metrics , Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 2009 [math/0612647]

    2008 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Vassilevich, Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual , Phys

    D.V. Vassilevich, Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual , Phys. Rept. 388 (2003) 279 [ hep-th/0306138]

    2003 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Brown and J.W

    J.D. Brown and J.W. York, Jr., Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1407 [ gr-qc/9209012]

    1993 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Lyth, What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?, Phys

    D.H. Lyth, What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 1861 [ hep-ph/9606387]

    1997 arXiv

  50. [58]

    BICEP, Keckcollaboration, Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 151301 [ 2110.00483]

    2021

  51. [59]

    M¨ uller and D

    C.A. M¨ uller and D. Delande,Disorder and interference: localization phenomena , arXiv e-prints (2010) arXiv:1005.0915 [1005.0915]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Nemiroff, J

    R.J. Nemiroff, J. Holmes and R. Connolly, Bounds on Spectral Dispersion from Fermi-detected Gamma Ray Bursts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231103 [ 1109.5191]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Hogg, Distance measures in cosmology, astro-ph/9905116

    D.W. Hogg, Distance measures in cosmology, astro-ph/9905116

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FR W models, Astrophys. J. 538 (2000) 473 [ astro-ph/9911177]

    2000 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Lewis, S

    A. Lewis, S. Bridle, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Camb: Code for anisotropies in the microwave background, 2018

    2018

  56. [64]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A5 [ 1907.12875]. – 23 –

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Planck collaboration, P lanckintermediate results. L VII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing , Astron. Astrophys. 643 (2020) A42 [ 2007.04997]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Rosenberg, S

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton and G. Efstathiou, CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517 (2022) 4620 [ 2205.10869]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters, 2503.14452

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Carron, M

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis, CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps , JCAP 09 (2022) 039 [2206.07773]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    ACT collaboration, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J. 962 (2024) 113 [ 2304.05203]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models , JCAP 05 (2021) 057 [ 2005.05290]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    DESI collaboration, DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest , 2503.14739

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Jones, C.J

    J. Jones, C.J. Copi, G.D. Starkman and Y. Akrami, The Universe is not statistically isotropic , 2310.12859

  66. [74]

    DESI collaboration, Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape , 2503.14744

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Loverde and Z.J

    M. Loverde and Z.J. Weiner, Massive neutrinos and cosmic composition , JCAP 12 (2024) 048 [2410.00090]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Lesgourgues and S

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Massive neutrinos and cosmology , Phys. Rept. 429 (2006) 307 [astro-ph/0603494]

    2006 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Popovic et al., A Reassessment of the Pantheon+ and DES 5YR Calibration Uncertainties: Dovekie , 2506.05471

    B. Popovic et al., A Reassessment of the Pantheon+ and DES 5YR Calibration Uncertainties: Dovekie , 2506.05471

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Johnson, The M.I.T

    K. Johnson, The M.I.T. Bag Model , Acta Phys. Polon. B 6 (1975) 865

    1975

  71. [79]

    Ivanov, M.A

    A.V. Ivanov, M.A. Kurkov and D.V. Vassilevich, Heat kernel, spectral functions and anomalies in Weyl semimetals, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 224004 [ 2111.11493]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Branson and P.B

    T.P. Branson and P.B. Gilkey, Residues of the eta function for an operator of dirac type with local boundary conditions, Differential Geometry and its Applications 2 (1992) 249. – 24 –

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.