Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Gravitational Wave Signatures of Periodic Motion near Higher-Derivative Einstein-\AE ther Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quadratic curvature corrections to Einstein-Æther black holes imprint parameter-dependent phase modulations and harmonic deformations on the gravitational waves emitted by periodic orbits.

desk verdict The paper applies periodic-orbit techniques to a combined Einstein-Æther plus curvature-squared metric, but a dimensionally wrong quadrupole-to-waveform step invalidates the main results. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00904 v1 pith:B6ZHTG5E submitted 2025-07-01 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

Sayantan Choudhury , Md Khalid Hossain , Gulnur Bauyrzhan , Koblandy Yerzhanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-phhep-th MSC 83C1083C3583C5783D05 PACS 04.30.-w04.50.Kd04.70.Bw
keywords higher-derivativeEinstein-Æthergravityperiodicorbitszoom-whirlgravitationalwavewaveformsquadrupoleapproximationextreme-mass-ratioinspiralsLorentzviolationblackholemetriccorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works in Einstein-Æther gravity supplemented by quadratic curvature terms $R^2$, $R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}$, and $R_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}R^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}$, solving perturbatively for a static spherically symmetric black hole metric. It then studies periodic timelike geodesics in that spacetime, organized by the rational frequency ratio $q = w + v/z$, and computes the tensor-mode gravitational waveforms $h_+$ and $h_\times$ in the quadrupole approximation. The central claim is that even small higher-derivative corrections shift the orbital dynamics and imprint characteristic phase modulations and harmonic deformations in the waveform, with the effect controlled by $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, and the aether parameter $c_{13}$. If correct, future space-based detectors watching extreme-mass-ratio inspirals could read ultraviolet modifications of gravity and Lorentz violation off the fine structure of the signal.

What carries the argument

The central object is the corrected metric function $e(r) = 1 - 2M/r + \alpha_1/r^2 + \alpha_2 \log r/r^2 - \lambda_0(2M/r)^4$, which enters the effective potential $V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = (1 + L^2/r^2)e(r)$ for equatorial timelike geodesics. This potential turns the radial geodesic equation into a sixth-order polynomial $P(x)$ in $x = 1/r$, and periodic orbits occur when the frequency ratio $q = (1/\pi)\int_{x_1}^{x_2} L/\sqrt{P(x)}\, dx - 1$ takes a rational value $w + v/z$, encoded in the $(z,w,v)$ triplet. The waveforms are generated from the second time derivatives of the quadrupole moment along these geodesics, using the polarization tensors of the two tensor modes that survive when $c_{14} = 0$.

What would settle it

Substitute the ansatz $e(r) = 1 - 2M/r + \alpha_1/r^2 + \alpha_2 \log r/r^2 - \lambda_0(2M/r)^4$ into the full field equations and expand to $O(1/r^4)$; if the residual stress-energy does not vanish at that order, the metric is not the solution and the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a worked-out chain from action to waveform: the corrected metric $e(r) = 1 - 2M/r + \alpha_1/r^2 + \alpha_2 \log r/r^2 - \lambda_0(2M/r)^4$, with $\alpha_1 = -(16\pi G_{ae}/3)(3\alpha+\beta+2\gamma)M$, $\alpha_2 = (16\pi G_{ae}/3)(\beta+4\gamma)M$, and $\lambda_0 = 27 c_{13}/[256(1-c_{13})]$, changes the effective potential for timelike geodesics, which in turn shifts the orbital frequency ratio $q$ and the rational $(z,w,v)$ classification of periodic orbits. The quadrupole waveforms $h_+$ and $h_\times$ computed along these geodesics show phase modulations and harmonic deformations relative to general relativity, with corrections proportional to $\gamma$ singled out as especially visible. The result is presented as a potential observational window into ultraviolet deviations and Lorentz-symmetry breaking in the strong-field regime.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain of results rests on the form of the higher-curvature metric correction $\delta e_{\mathrm{HD}}(r) = \alpha_1/r^2 + \alpha_2 \log r/r^2$: the paper introduces this correction without deriving it from the quadratic-curvature field equations, so if the actual solution differs, the orbital shifts and waveform deformations do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With $c_{14} = 0$ the polarization content is purely tensor, so any deviation from general relativity in the computed $h_+$ and $h_\times$ is a clean signal for quadratic-curvature and aether parameters.
  • The frequency ratio $q$ that fixes the $(z,w,v)$ orbit family depends on $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, and $\lambda_0$, so measured orbital harmonics can be mapped back to the coupling constants once a periodic orbit is identified.
  • Even small values of $\gamma$ are claimed to produce visible harmonic deformations, making $\gamma$ the most promising of the curvature couplings for future detectors.
  • Because the adiabatic approximation holds for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, the same waveform model applies directly to the EMRI signals that future space-based detectors are designed to observe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the metric correction is the true solution, the same $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ terms will shift light deflection and perihelion precession at the same post-Newtonian order, giving independent checks on the coefficients the waveform analysis is sensitive to.
  • The quadrupole calculation covers only a few orbits and ignores radiation reaction, but EMRI signals accumulate over thousands of cycles; a full inspiral waveform would show whether the phase modulation grows secularly or cancels.
  • A parameter-estimation forecast on synthetic data from future space-based detectors would convert the claimed phase sensitivity into quantitative bounds on $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, and $c_{13}$; the paper identifies the observable but does not quantify the reach.
  • The unusual $\log r$ term in the metric correction, if physical, may also alter horizon thermodynamics and quasinormal-mode spectra, providing additional signatures of the same underlying corrections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a static, spherically symmetric black hole metric in Einstein-Æther theory supplemented by quadratic curvature corrections, with the metric function e(r) = 1 - 2M/r + α1/r^2 + α2 log r/r^2 - λ0 (2M/r)^4 (Eq. (19)). It then computes periodic timelike geodesics, classifies them with the (z,w,v) periodic-orbit table, and uses a quadrupole approximation to compute the tensor gravitational waveforms h+ and h× (Eqs. (45)-(46)). The central claim is that higher-derivative and æther corrections imprint phase shifts and harmonic distortions in the waveforms that are sensitive to α, β, γ, and c13, providing a possible observational probe with future detectors such as LISA.

Significance. If the calculation were correct, the paper would extend the periodic-orbit gravitational-wave program to a combined Einstein-Æther plus higher-curvature setting, potentially offering a new test of Lorentz violation and ultraviolet gravity modifications. The paper correctly notes that for c14 = 0 only the two tensor polarizations survive, which is an important consistency check with current observations. It also makes sensible use of the established Levin periodic-orbit classification framework. However, the central metric correction is introduced without derivation, and the gravitational wave formulas are dimensionally inconsistent and mathematically incorrect. As presented, the claims are not supported by the paper's own equations, so the significance is currently prospective rather than demonstrated. The paper does not provide reproducible code, error estimates, or a detectability analysis, which further limits its present contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§V.B, Eqs. (34)-(36) and (45)-(46)] The waveform formulas do not follow from the stated quadrupole definition. With Q_ij = m(x_i x_j - (1/3)δ_ij r^2), the second time derivative for equatorial motion is Qddot_xx - Qddot_yy = 2m(\dot x^2 - \dot y^2 + x\ddot x - y\ddot y), so h+ = (2G_ae m/D_L)(\dot x^2 - \dot y^2 + x\ddot x - y\ddot y). Equation (45) instead states h+ = (G_ae m/D_L)(\ddot x^2 - \ddot y^2), which is not the second derivative of x^2 - y^2, has dimensions of 1/L^2 rather than being dimensionless in c=1 units, and changes the amplitude scaling; for a circular orbit x = R cos(Ωt), y = R sin(Ωt) the correct expression is proportional to R^2Ω^2 cos(2Ωt), whereas Eq. (45) gives R^2Ω^4 cos(2Ωt). Since the figures and parameter-sensitivity claims in Sec. V are built on Eqs. (45)-(46), this error invalidates the central waveform claim of the paper.
  2. [§III, Eqs. (16)-(19)] The higher-derivative correction δe_HD(r) = α1/r^2 + α2 log r/r^2, with coefficients α1 and α2 given in Eqs. (17)-(18), is presented without derivation. The abstract states that the corrected metric is derived, but the manuscript does not show how Eqs. (16)-(18) follow from the field equations (11), nor does it cite a source for the result. This is load-bearing because the entire geodesic and waveform analysis uses metric (19); if this correction is not the actual perturbative solution, all subsequent results collapse. The authors need either to provide the derivation explicitly or to cite a verifiable derivation.
  3. [§V, overall] The paper claims that the resulting signatures provide a potential observational window for LISA, but it contains no error estimates, no signal-to-noise estimates, and no comparison of the computed waveform amplitudes with plausible detector sensitivities or astrophysical event rates. The adiabatic approximation is asserted without checking whether the radiation-reaction timescale is long compared with the orbital timescale for the parameters used in Figs. 1 and 2. This lack of quantitative support makes the observational claim premature even if the waveform formulas were corrected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II, Eq. (3)] The field equation (3) has notation that is difficult to parse, with the subscripts on the H terms misaligned; the equation appears to be missing parentheses or indices in several terms, and the overall sign conventions in Eqs. (4)-(6) should be checked against standard references.
  2. [§III, Eq. (15)] The subscript for the æther correction is missing in the text; δe_(r) should be written with a clear identifier, for example δe_ae(r), to avoid confusion with the total metric perturbation.
  3. [§IV, Eq. (28)] The polynomial P(x) is said to be sixth-order in x, but the displayed expression includes α2 x^2 log(1/x), which is not a polynomial in x; the text should describe P(x) as a function involving a logarithm rather than as a polynomial.
  4. [§V, Figs. 1 and 2] The figures are not described with sufficient detail: the axes, the values of the free parameters α, β, γ, c13, M, and L, and the normalization of h+ and h× are not stated, making it impossible for the reader to reproduce or interpret the plotted waveforms.
  5. [References] Reference [35] lists 'T. J. E. Barausse and T. P. Sotiriou', which appears to be an incorrect author name; the reference should be checked and corrected, and the paper would benefit from citing the original Einstein-Æther black hole papers for the c14 = 0 branch used in Eq. (15).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the waveforms and orbital shifts are computed consequences of an assumed corrected metric, not fitted inputs restated as predictions; the main defects are an unsupported metric ansatz and an internal quadrupole-derivative inconsistency, neither of which is circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: assume the higher-derivative Einstein-Æther action (1), state the corrected metric (14)-(19), solve the geodesic equations (25)-(28), compute the periodic-orbit frequency ratio (29), and evaluate the gravitational waveform from equations (45)-(46). At no point is a quantity fitted to data and subsequently 'predicted' as an independent result: the couplings α, β, γ, and c13 appear explicitly as inputs in the metric coefficients (17), (18), and (40), and they appear in the output only through the equations of motion and the waveform expressions. This is a deductive consequence rather than a circular reduction. The unsupported step is eqs. (16)-(18), where the higher-curvature correction δe_HD(r) is introduced as 'given by' without being derived from the field equations; that is an unverified ansatz and would undermine the conclusions if incorrect, but it is not equivalent to the target result by construction and does not involve fitting or renaming. Similarly, the replacement of the quadrupole second time derivative (34)-(36) by products of accelerations (45)-(46) is an internal mathematical error with inconsistent dimensions and frequency scaling, but it is not a circularity: the waveform output is not being used as an input. There is also no load-bearing self-citation; the primary inspiration [1] is by Lu and Zhu, not the present authors, and the other cited works are external. The paper's central claim—that the assumed metric correction imprints phase modulations and harmonic deformations—is a legitimate forward calculation from stated assumptions, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed form of the corrected metric. Neither the higher-curvature correction δe_HD nor the waveform normalization is derived from the action. The remaining inputs, such as c14=0 and the quadrupole approximation, are standard or cited assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • α1 = -16πG_ae/3 (3α+β+2γ) M
    Coefficient of the 1/r^2 correction in the metric, introduced without derivation from the quadratic-curvature field equations; its form is an ad hoc postulate of the paper.
  • α2 = 16πG_ae/3 (β+4γ) M
    Coefficient of the log r/r^2 correction, similarly asserted without derivation from the field equations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The static spherically symmetric metric ansatz in eq. (13) with e(r) written as 1 - 2M/r + δe_æ + δe_HD.
    No Birkhoff theorem is cited or proven for the combined theory; the metric form is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The higher-curvature correction δe_HD(r) = α1/r^2 + α2 log r/r^2 with coefficients given in eqs. (17)-(18).
    Stated in Section III without solving the field equations; this is the load-bearing assumption that all later results depend on.
  • domain assumption The c14 = 0 condition in Einstein-Æther theory leaves only two tensor polarizations.
    Cited from references [12-14], used to justify considering only h+ and h×.
  • standard math The quadrupole approximation for gravitational wave emission is valid for the studied orbits.
    Standard approximation for EMRIs, but the implementation in eqs. (45)-(46) does not follow from the reduced quadrupole moment in eq. (36).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Wave Signatures of Periodic Motion near Higher-Derivative Einstein-\AE ther Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B6ZHTG5E

@misc{pith2026250700904,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Wave Signatures of Periodic Motion near Higher-Derivative Einstein-\AE ther Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B6ZHTG5E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00904}
}
abstract

Higher-derivative modifications of general relativity are generically expected from effective field theory approaches to quantum gravity, and they arise naturally in Lorentz-violating theories such as Einstein-Ether gravity. In this work, we investigate black hole spacetimes within Einstein-Ether theory supplemented by quadratic curvature corrections, including terms proportional to $R^2$, $R_{\mu\nu} R^{\mu\nu}$, and $R_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} R^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}$. We derive the corrected static, spherically symmetric metric perturbatively and examine its effects on the geodesic structure and gravitational wave emission. In particular, we analyze periodic timelike orbits in this background and compute the associated tensor-mode gravitational waveforms using the quadrupole approximation. Our results demonstrate that even small higher-derivative corrections can induce distinguishable shifts in the orbital dynamics and imprint characteristic phase modulations and harmonic deformations in the gravitational wave signal. These effects modify the frequency spectrum and amplitude envelope of $h_{+}$ and $h_{\times}$ in a manner sensitive to the coupling constants $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$, and the Ether parameter $c_{13}$. The resulting signatures provide a potential observational window into ultraviolet deviations from general relativity and Lorentz symmetry in the strong-field regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00904 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The Higher-Derivative Einstein-Æther theory solution’s periodic orbits, c13 are set with distinct values in each column, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The left figure illustrates a particle moving from one apastron to another along a typical periodic orbit around a black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Periodic orbits and gravitational wave signatures from magnetic dipoles around magnetized Kerr black holes

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a magnetic-dipole particle around a magnetized Kerr black hole, the magnetic coupling β shifts the ISCO and marginally bound orbit outward and leaves a zoom-whirl burst signature in the gravitational-wave strain t...

  2. New constraints on modified gravity with dimension-six operators from gravitational waves

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dimension-six Lorentz-violating gravity operator is linearized to obtain gravitational-wave dispersion relations, and time-of-flight data from GW170817 and GW150914 bound the coefficients to 10^-5 to 10^-4 m^2 (nonb...

  3. Gravitational radiations from periodic orbits around a black hole in the effective field theory extension of general relativity

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Periodic orbits around EFTGR black holes produce gravitational waveforms whose substructures increase in complexity with higher zoom numbers.

  4. Periodic Timelike Motion and Gravitational Wave Signatures around a Magnetically Charged Black Hole Surrounded by Quintessence

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Quintessence shifts orbital radii, turning points, and zoom-whirl parameters for timelike geodesics around a magnetically charged black hole, producing burst-like gravitational waveforms whose phase, timing, and milli...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gravitational radiations from periodic orbits around einstein-\ae {} ther black holes,

    S. Lu and T. Zhu, “Gravitational radiations from periodic orbits around einstein-\ae {} ther black holes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00294(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari,et al., “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,”Physical review letters116 no. 6, (2016) 061102

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Gw150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with advanced ligo,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari,et al., “Gw150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with advanced ligo,”Physical Review D93 no. 12, (2016) 122003

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Properties of the binary black hole merger gw150914,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari,et al., “Properties of the binary black hole merger gw150914,”Physical review letters 116 no. 24, (2016) 241102

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Gw150914: The advanced ligo detectors in the era of first discoveries,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari,et al., “Gw150914: The advanced ligo detectors in the era of first discoveries,” Physical review letters116 no. 13, (2016) 131103

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 953

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov, and I. L. Shapiro, Effective Action in Quantum Gravity. IOP Publishing, 1992

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Avoiding dark energy with 1/r modifications of gravity,

    R. P. Woodard, “Avoiding dark energy with 1/r modifications of gravity,”Lect. Notes Phys.720 (2007) 403

    work page 2007

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,”Physical Review D64 no. 2, (2001) 024028

    2001

  2. [10]

    Einstein-aether gravity: A status report,

    T. Jacobson, “Einstein-aether gravity: A status report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.1547(2008)

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Einstein-aether theory,

    C. Eling, T. Jacobson, and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-aether theory,” inDeserfest, pp. 163–179. World Scientific, 2006

    2006

  4. [12]

    Einstein-aether waves,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Einstein-aether waves,” Physical Review D70 no. 2, (2004) 024003

    2004

  5. [13]

    Models of non-relativistic quantum gravity: The good, the bad and the healthy,

    D. Blas, O. Pujolas, and S. Sibiryakov, “Models of non-relativistic quantum gravity: The good, the bad and the healthy,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011 no. 4, (2011) 1–53

    2011

  6. [14]

    Black hole based tests of general relativity,

    K. Yagi and L. C. Stein, “Black hole based tests of general relativity,”Classical and Quantum Gravity33 no. 5, (2016) 054001

    2016

  7. [15]

    A periodic table for black hole orbits,

    J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, “A periodic table for black hole orbits,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology77 no. 10, (2008) 103005

    2008

  8. [16]

    Dynamics of black hole pairs. i. periodic tables,

    J. Levin and R. Grossman, “Dynamics of black hole pairs. i. periodic tables,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology79 no. 4, (2009) 043016

    2009

  9. [17]

    Dynamics of black hole pairs. ii. spherical orbits and the homoclinic limit of zoom-whirliness,

    R. Grossman and J. Levin, “Dynamics of black hole pairs. ii. spherical orbits and the homoclinic limit of zoom-whirliness,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology79 no. 4, (2009) 043017

    2009

  10. [18]

    Homoclinic orbits around spinning black holes. i. exact solution for the kerr separatrix,

    J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, “Homoclinic orbits around spinning black holes. i. exact solution for the kerr separatrix,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology79 no. 12, (2009) 124013

    2009

  11. [19]

    Homoclinic orbits around spinning black holes. ii. the phase space portrait,

    G. Perez-Giz and J. Levin, “Homoclinic orbits around spinning black holes. ii. the phase space portrait,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 79 no. 12, (2009) 124014

    2009

  12. [20]

    Zoom-whirl orbits in black hole binaries,

    J. Healy, J. Levin, and D. Shoemaker, “Zoom-whirl orbits in black hole binaries,”Physical review letters 103 no. 13, (2009) 131101

    2009

  13. [21]

    Energy level diagrams for black hole orbits,

    J. Levin, “Energy level diagrams for black hole orbits,” Classical and Quantum Gravity26 no. 23, (2009) 235010

    2009

  14. [22]

    Rational orbits around charged black holes,

    V. Misra and J. Levin, “Rational orbits around charged black holes,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology82 no. 8, (2010) 083001

    2010

  15. [23]

    Harmonic structure of generic kerr orbits,

    R. Grossman, J. Levin, and G. Perez-Giz, “Harmonic structure of generic kerr orbits,”Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology85 no. 2, (2012) 023012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Zoom and whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction,

    K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick, “Zoom and whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction,” Physical Review D66 no. 4, (2002) 044002

    2002

  17. [25]

    Periodic orbits around a spherically symmetric naked singularity,

    G. Z. Babar, A. Z. Babar, and Y.-K. Lim, “Periodic orbits around a spherically symmetric naked singularity,”Physical Review D96 no. 8, (2017) 084052

    2017

  18. [26]

    Periodic orbits around kerr sen black holes,

    C.-Q. Liu, C.-K. Ding, and J.-L. Jing, “Periodic orbits around kerr sen black holes,”Communications in Theoretical Physics71 no. 12, (2019) 1461

    2019

  19. [27]

    Orbital mechanics and quasiperiodic oscillation resonances of black holes in einstein-æther theory,

    M. Azreg-Aïnou, Z. Chen, B. Deng, M. Jamil, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, and Y.-K. Lim, “Orbital mechanics and quasiperiodic oscillation resonances of black holes in einstein-æther theory,”Physical Review D102 no. 4, (2020) 044028

    2020

  20. [28]

    Probing a black-bounce-reissner–nordström spacetime with precessing and periodic motion,

    J. Zhang and Y. Xie, “Probing a black-bounce-reissner–nordström spacetime with precessing and periodic motion,”The European Physical Journal C 82 no. 10, (2022) 854

    2022

  21. [29]

    Periodic orbits around a static spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by quintessence,

    R. Wang, F. Gao, and H. Chen, “Periodic orbits around a static spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by quintessence,” Annals of Physics447 (2022) 169167

    2022

  22. [30]

    Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity,

    Z.-Y. Tu, T. Zhu, and A. Wang, “Periodic orbits and their gravitational wave radiations in a polymer black hole in loop quantum gravity,”Physical Review D108 no. 2, (2023) 024035

    2023

  23. [31]

    Periodic orbits around brane-world black holes,

    X.-M. Deng, “Periodic orbits around brane-world black holes,” The European Physical Journal C80 no. 6, (2020) 489

    2020

  24. [32]

    Geodesics and periodic orbits around quantum-corrected black holes,

    X.-M. Deng, “Geodesics and periodic orbits around quantum-corrected black holes,”Physics of the Dark Universe 30 (2020) 100629

    2020

  25. [33]

    Bound orbits and epicyclic motions around renormalization group improved schwarzschild black holes,

    H.-Y. Lin and X.-M. Deng, “Bound orbits and epicyclic motions around renormalization group improved schwarzschild black holes,”Universe 8 no. 5, (2022) 278. 8

    2022

  26. [34]

    Precessing and periodic timelike orbits and their potential applications in einsteinian cubic gravity,

    Y.-Z. Li, X.-M. Kuang, and Y. Sang, “Precessing and periodic timelike orbits and their potential applications in einsteinian cubic gravity,”The European Physical Journal C 84 no. 5, (2024) 529

    2024

  27. [35]

    Black holes in einstein-Æther and hoVrava–lifshitz gravity,

    T. J. E. Barausse and T. P. Sotiriou, “Black holes in einstein-Æther and hoVrava–lifshitz gravity,”Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124043

    2011

  28. [36]

    Phenomenology of theories of gravity without lorentz invariance: The preferred frame case,

    D. Blas and E. Lim, “Phenomenology of theories of gravity without lorentz invariance: The preferred frame case,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014) 1443009

    2014

  29. [37]

    Equivalence principle and gravitational waves from extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    L. C. Stein and K. Yagi, “Equivalence principle and gravitational waves from extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 044026

    2014

  30. [38]

    Laser interferometer space antenna,

    P. A.-S. et al., “Laser interferometer space antenna,” arXiv:1702.00786 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,

    N. Yunes and X. Siemens, “Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,”Living Reviews in Relativity16 no. 1, (2013) 1–124

    2013

  32. [40]

    Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations,

    E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker, et al., “Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations,”Classical and Quantum Gravity 32 no. 24, (2015) 243001

    2015

  33. [41]

    Constraining generic lorentz violation and the speed of the graviton with gravitational waves,

    S. Mirshekari, N. Yunes, and C. M. Will, “Constraining generic lorentz violation and the speed of the graviton with gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D85 no. 024041, (2012) 1110–2720

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.