Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six $b$-quarks using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 13\,\mathrm{TeV}$ with the ATLAS detector

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A search for Higgs boson decays into scalar particles that decay into four or six b-quarks finds no significant excess above the Standard Model and sets 95% confidence-level upper limits on the exotic branching fractions.

desk verdict A genuinely new ATLAS result — first limits on the a1a2->4b and 3a1->6b channels plus a 5-15x low-mass improvement — with one calibration-transfer question worth pressing and some draft junk in the arXiv text that should never have shipped. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01165 v2 pith:ZGA2LLLC submitted 2025-07-01 hep-ex

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords exoticHiggsdecaysHtoaa4bsixb-quarksmergedb-jettaggingDeXTerZHproductionsoftsecondaryverticesLHCRun2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a search for the Higgs boson decaying into new scalar or pseudoscalar particles, called $a$-bosons, that subsequently decay into pairs of $b$-quarks, using $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\mathrm{TeV}$ from LHC Run 2. It considers three decay scenarios: $H\to 2a\to 4b$ with $12

What carries the argument

The central object is the DeXTer tagger, a deep-set neural network that identifies a 'B-jet': a single jet containing the overlapping hadronization products of two $b$-quarks, using large-radius track-jets, exclusive-$k_t$ subjet axes, displaced tracks, and secondary vertices. The analysis then defines a unified 'b-object' made of B-jets, ordinary $b$-jets tagged by a deep neural network classifier, and soft secondary vertices found outside jets, and uses a permutation-invariant quadruplet-selection neural network to pair four b-objects into two $a$-boson candidates and a Higgs candidate. Boosted decision trees per signal region discriminate the signal from $Z$+jets, $t\bar{t}$, and multijet backgrounds, with the $t\bar{t}$ and $Z$+jets predictions corrected to data in dedicated control regions.

What would settle it

Recompute the 95% CL limits for $m_a=12$ to $16$ GeV with the DeXTer efficiency scale factors shifted to the edges of their quoted uncertainties; if the limits move by more than the reported final uncertainty, the low-mass exclusions are not robust. A dedicated measurement of merged double-b tagging in a low-momentum signal-like sample would settle this directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that no beyond-Standard-Model signal appears in the $ZH$-associated production of $H\to 4b$ or $6b$ final states, and the absence lets the analysis set quantitative bounds on exotic Higgs decay branching fractions. The search is the first to use the $Z\to\nu\nu$ (0-lepton) channel for exotic Higgs decays, provides the first coverage of the $H\to a_1a_2\to 3a_1\to 6b$ final state, and extends the $H\to a_1a_2\to 4b$ search to the full 12 to 60 GeV scalar mass range. The 4% to 25% limits on $H\to 2a\to 4b$ are the strongest obtained so far for low scalar masses, largely because a dedicated merged-jet tagger and soft secondary vertices recover events where the $b\bar{b}$ pair from a light $a$-boson is collimated into one low-momentum jet.

Load-bearing premise

The low-mass limits rely on the DeXTer merged double-b tagging efficiency measured in top-pair and Z-plus-gluon data, with scale factors of 1.0 to 1.9 and uncertainties of 0.1 to 0.5, applying unchanged to the low-momentum a-to-bb jets from Higgs decays.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the branching fraction of $H\to 2a\to 4b$ is bounded between 4% and 25% at 95% CL for scalar masses from 12 to 60 GeV.
  • The 0-lepton channel adds about 15% sensitivity at the lowest masses, so including invisible-$Z$ events is a proven route for future low-mass exotic Higgs searches.
  • The first constraints on $H\to a_1a_2\to 3a_1\to 6b$ limit two-scalar cascade models with a light scalar below half the heavier scalar mass.
  • The deviations at $m_a=25$ GeV and $(50,70)$ GeV are the places to watch: with more data they must either grow into a discovery or relax to background.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The DeXTer-style merged double-b tagging could be transferred to other searches for boosted low-mass resonances decaying to $b\bar{b}$, such as axion-like particles or dark Higgs bosons, where the same low-$p_T$ collimation problem appears.
  • Because the limits are quoted on the production ratio times branching fraction, they can be reinterpreted in any model with $ZH$ production and scalar-mediated $4b$ or $6b$ final states, not only the specific benchmark scenarios simulated.
  • A calibration sample with kinematics closer to the signal, for example boosted low-mass $a\to b\bar b$ jets selected from data with an independent tagger, would directly reduce the dominant low-mass systematic and sharpen the most improved limits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports a search for exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in ZH production, targeting H→2a→4b, H→a1a2→4b, and H→a1a2→3a1→6b final states with a→bb. It uses 140 fb^-1 of 13 TeV pp collisions collected by ATLAS, with the Z boson decaying to two leptons (2ℓ channel) or to neutrinos (0ℓ channel). The analysis relies on a dedicated merged B-jet tagger (DeXTer), standard b-tagging (DL1r), and soft secondary-vertex reconstruction, with events categorized by b-object multiplicity and a BDT discriminant. Backgrounds are estimated from simulation normalized in control regions for Z+jets and ttbar, plus an ABCD data-driven estimate for QCD multijet events in the 0ℓ channel. A binned profile likelihood is used to derive 95% CL upper limits. No significant excess is found; the largest local (global) significances are 2.83 (2.04) σ at m_a=25 GeV and 3.28 (2.57) σ at (m_a1,m_a2)=(50,70) GeV. The resulting limits on σ(ZH)/σ_SM(ZH) times the branching fraction are 4%–25% for H→2a→4b at 12–60 GeV, 24%–38% for H→a1a2→4b, and 10%–20% for H→a1a2→3a1→6b at the tested mass points, improving previous ATLAS sensitivity by roughly a factor 5–15 at low mass.

Significance. The result, if correct, significantly advances experimental coverage of exotic Higgs decays at low scalar masses and provides the first constraints on the H→a1a2→4b and H→a1a2→3a1→6b scenarios in this mass range. The paper follows current best practice: dedicated control regions for the dominant backgrounds, a data-driven ABCD estimate with an explicit closure validation for the multijet background, systematic uncertainties propagated through nuisance parameters, CLs limits with asymptotic checks against pseudo-experiments, and look-elsewhere-corrected significances. Extensive post-fit validation plots are shown for all relevant categories. The main limitation is that the low-mass sensitivity rests on the transfer of DeXTer merged-B tagging efficiencies from ttbar and Z+g→bb calibration samples to signal-like a→bb jets; this transfer is not directly validated in the text.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4.5, Section 8.1, Table 10] The headline improvement for m_a below about 20 GeV rests on the DeXTer merged-B efficiency transfer. The scale factors are measured in ttbar and Z+g→bb events and applied as functions of jet pT, eta, and generator-level flavor, but not as functions of the internal two-quark opening angle or subjet structure of the a→bb decay. The signal jets are lower-pT jets from a scalar two-body decay and have different boost and substructure than gluon-splitting bb pairs. Table 10 shows that the quoted DeXTer systematic uncertainty has a small impact at m_a=12 GeV (combined limit 0.025 stat-only versus 0.026 with DeXTer tagging), so a topology-dependent bias in the scale factors would not be covered by the quoted uncertainties and would shift precisely the limits advertised as the main improvement. The validation of this transfer is deferred to Ref. [27] and cannot be audited from the text. I request either a closure test of the DeXTer efficiency in signal-like a→bb jets or a quantitative study of the scale-factor dependence on the relevant subjet variables, propagated as an additional uncertainty. This concern is distinct from the no-excess claim, which is dominated by background validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 10] The condition 'm_a1 > m_a2' in the sentence describing the probed phase space contradicts the stated convention m_a1 < m_a2 adopted in the Introduction; the inequality should be corrected.
  2. [Various figures and captions] The manuscript contains several visible draft or production artifacts, including an 'ATLAS DRAFT' watermark, duplicated text around Figure 3 with a date stamp, inconsistent figure numbering (Figure 8 versus Figure 9), missing spaces in the Figure 10 caption ('SR 2Bt(3j)0lSR...'), and garbled axis labels in Figure 14 ('0/l.script-channel'). These should be cleaned before publication.
  3. [Section 4.5 and Section 8.1] The DeXTer calibration is described in one place as a function of jet pT and eta and in another as a function of jet pT and generator-level flavor; the wording should be made consistent.
  4. [Section 10] The description of the global p-value computation, including the 'reference p-value of 0.5' and the Euler-characteristic extension, is terse; a short statement of the scanned mass grid and the effective number of trials would help readers assess the reported global significances of 2.04 and 2.57.
  5. [Table 10] The 'Soft-v' row contains only dashes in several columns; if the impact is below the 1% reporting threshold, this should be stated explicitly rather than left as empty cells.
  6. [Results and figures] Consider adding a table with observed and predicted yields in the highest-signal BDT bins, since the most important deviations are currently conveyed only through figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exclusion limits are derived from observed data in signal regions, with backgrounds constrained by orthogonal control regions and external tagger calibrations.

full rationale

The central claim, that no significant excess is observed and that 95% CL upper limits of 4% to 38% are set on sigma(ZH)/sigma_SM(ZH) times branching fraction, is a direct statistical statement about the 140 fb^-1 dataset. The signal-strength parameter mu is left free in the profile likelihood, and the background normalizations are fitted in control regions that are orthogonal to, or kinematically separated from, the signal regions; the SR yields are then compared with the background-only prediction rather than being forced to equal any fitted input. The DeXTer merged-B-jet efficiency used for low-mass sensitivity is calibrated in ttbar and Z+g(->bb) collision data in Ref. [27], which is an independent measured calibration outside the present paper's fitted values; even though the transferability to low-pT a->bb jets is a legitimate systematic concern, it is not a circular step because the final limit is not equal by construction to those scale factors. The ABCD multijet estimate A = B x C/D is validated in a separate validation region and its closure is reported, so the estimate is not merely a restatement of the input data. The quadruplet-selection NN and BDTs are trained on signal simulation, but the final result is obtained by fitting observed data and checking post-fit agreement in signal-depleted regions; training a discriminant on simulated signal does not make the no-excess observation equivalent to the training input. No parameter fitted to a subset of the data is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior work, and no known empirical pattern is merely relabeled. The only self-referential element is the use of ATLAS Refs. [27] and [30] for tagger definitions and calibrations, but these are data-driven calibrations rather than assumptions that already contain the search result, and therefore they do not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The free parameters are the usual statistical-model normalizations and calibration scale factors of a high-luminosity search; none is fitted in the signal region itself. The DeXTer scale factors are the largest data-to-MC corrections and deserve scrutiny as the main experimental handle for the low-mass claims. The a-bosons are hypotheses from prior theory, properly cited, and constrained rather than required by this analysis.

free parameters (7)
  • DeXTer B-jet efficiency scale factors = 1.0 to 1.9 per pT/eta bin
    Correct the data-to-simulation efficiency of merged double-b tagging; applied to all signal and background yields (Section 4.5) and dominant systematic at low ma (Table 10).
  • Z+jets common normalization = 1.04 to 1.18
    Unconstrained nuisance parameter fit to Z+jets control regions; the relative fractions of Z+>=1b and Z+>=1B cannot be constrained separately and are covered by modeling uncertainties (Section 9).
  • ttbar overall normalization = 0.96 to 1.03
    Nuisance parameter fit to ttbar control regions (Section 9).
  • ttbar+>=1b normalization = 0.87 to 1.17
    Nuisance parameter fit to ttbar control regions split by b-object multiplicity (Section 9).
  • ttbar+>=1B normalization = 1.08 to 1.39
    Nuisance parameter fit to ttbar control regions (Section 9).
  • 0l lost-lepton normalization = 1.25 to 1.28
    Independent normalization for the 0-lepton channel lost-lepton backgrounds (Section 9).
  • Background modeling corrections (ttbar HF score reweighting, jet multiplicity, HTred, pT(Z)) = Derived from data in control regions; shapes shown in Figures 7 and 8
    Correction factors applied to Monte Carlo to match control-region data before the signal-region prediction; their parameters are propagated as systematic uncertainties (Section 7.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BR(a->bb) is close to unity for 2mb < ma < mH/2
    Taken from the Higgs-portal literature (Refs [5, 24]); the limits are quoted for this benchmark and would not directly apply if the a decays visibly elsewhere.
  • domain assumption Narrow-width approximation for the scalar decays H->aa and a->bb in signal simulation
    Section 3 states 'the decays are performed in the narrow-width approximation'; very narrow scalars are assumed.
  • domain assumption Background shapes for Z+jets and ttbar from Monte Carlo are correct after control-region corrections
    Sections 7.1 and 7.2: the signal-region prediction inherits corrected MC shapes extrapolated from 3-object and control regions.
  • domain assumption The two ABCD variables, minDeltaPhi(ETmiss,a) and maa, are sufficiently uncorrelated for QCD multijet events
    Section 7.2: A = B times C/D; the closure check is performed in the neighboring A* validation region, not in the signal region itself.
  • domain assumption The reconstruction and results are insensitive to the parity of the a-boson
    The introduction states 'the results presented here do not depend on the parity assumed for the a-boson'; this is assumed for the scalars and pseudoscalars interpretation.
invented entities (2)
  • Light scalar or pseudoscalar a independent evidence
    purpose: Intermediate state in the searched decay H->2a->4b
    Not introduced by this paper; it comes from Higgs-portal and NMSSM literature (Refs [5-24]). The search itself is the falsifiable handle: no signal is found in 140 inverse femtobarns, so there is no observational evidence beyond the hypothesis.
  • Two scalars a1 and a2 with m_a1 < m_a2 independent evidence
    purpose: Intermediate states in H->a1a2->4b and the cascade H->a1a2->3a1->6b
    From two-real-scalar-singlet models (Ref [22]); this paper provides the first direct experimental bounds on these decay chains, which is the falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six $b$-quarks using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 13\,\mathrm{TeV}$ with the ATLAS detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZGA2LLLC

@misc{pith2026250701165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six $b$-quarks using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrts= 13\,\mathrmTeV$ with the ATLAS detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZGA2LLLC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01165}
}
abstract

A search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson $H$ into new scalar or pseudoscalar particles that subsequently decay into $b$-quarks is presented. The search considers $ZH$ production with several decay scenarios for the Higgs boson: first to a pair of identical scalars, $H\rightarrow 2a \rightarrow 4b$, second to a pair of scalars with different masses ($m_{a1}<m_{a2}$), either directly, $H\rightarrow a_1a_2 \rightarrow 4b$, or via a longer decay chain, $H \rightarrow a_1a_2 \rightarrow 3a_1 \rightarrow 6b$. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $140~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. No significant excess above the Standard Model prediction is observed. The search sets upper limits at 95% confidence level on the ratio of the Higgs boson production cross-section to the SM prediction times the branching ratio of Higgs bosons decaying into $4b$ or $6b$, between 4% and 25% for $\sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{\text{SM}}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}$($H \rightarrow 2a \rightarrow 4b$), between 24% and 38% for $\sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{\text{SM}}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}$($H \rightarrow a_1a_2 \rightarrow 4b$), and between 10% and 20% for $\sigma(ZH)/\sigma_{\text{SM}}(ZH) \times \mathcal{B}$($H \rightarrow a_1a_2 \rightarrow 3a_1 \rightarrow 6b$), depending on the masses of the scalar particles.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Search for decays of the Higgs boson into pair-produced pseudoscalar particles decaying into $\tau^+\tau^-\tau^+\tau^-$ using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-03 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    No significant excess is observed; 95% CL upper limits on B(H→aa→4τ) range from 0.06 to 0.23 for ma between 15 and 60 GeV.

  2. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    An updated review chapter on extended scalar sectors, their constraints, dark matter and CP violation links, and future collider searches.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration, DeXTer: Deep Sets based Neural Networks for Low-𝑝T 𝑋→𝑏 ¯𝑏 Identification in ATLAS, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-042, 2022,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2825434

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1, arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [3]

    ATLAS Collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 52, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature612 (2022) E24

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    CMS Collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 60, arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature623 (2023) E4

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys

    D. Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 075004, arXiv: 1312.4992 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [6]

    B. A. Dobrescu and K. T. Matchev, Light axion within the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP09 (2000) 031, arXiv: hep-ph/0008192 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [7]

    Ellwanger, J

    U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, C. Hugonie, and S. Moretti, Towards a No-Lose Theorem for NMSSM Higgs Discovery at the LHC, (2003), arXiv: hep-ph/0305109

    arXiv 2003

Show all 145 references
  1. [8]

    Dermíšek and J

    R. Dermíšek and J. F. Gunion,Escaping the Large Fine-Tuning and Little Hierarchy Problems in the Next to Minimal Supersymmetric Model andℎ→𝑎𝑎 Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005) 041801, arXiv:hep-ph/0502105

    2005 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Chang, R

    S. Chang, R. Dermíšek, J. F. Gunion, and N. Weiner,Nonstandard Higgs Boson Decays, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.58(2008) 75, arXiv:0801.4554 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [10]

    D. E. Morrissey and A. Pierce,Modified Higgs boson phenomenology from gauge or gaugino mediation in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 075029, arXiv: 0807.2259 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Silveira and A

    V. Silveira and A. Zee,Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B161 (1985) 136

    1985

  5. [12]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 53, arXiv: 0711.4866 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Draper, T

    P. Draper, T. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner, L.-T. Wang, and H. Zhang,Dark Light-Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 121805, arXiv:1009.3963 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [14]

    S. Ipek, D. McKeen, and A. E. Nelson, Renormalizable model for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess from dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 055021, arXiv:1404.3716 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Martin, J

    A. Martin, J. Shelton, and J. Unwin, Fitting the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Cascade Annihilations, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 103513, arXiv:1405.0272 [hep-ph]. 40

    2014 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kozaczuk, M

    J. Kozaczuk, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and J. Shelton, Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 115035, arXiv: 1911.10210 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Carena, Z

    M. Carena, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang,Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z2-breaking, JHEP08 (2020) 107, arXiv:1911.10206 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Craig, A

    N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler, and R. Sundrum,Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC, JHEP07 (2015) 105, arXiv:1501.05310 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Curtin and C

    D. Curtin and C. B. Verhaaren,Discovering Uncolored Naturalness in Exotic Higgs Decays, JHEP12(2015) 1, arXiv:1506.06141 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Robens and T

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 104, arXiv:1501.02234 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Robens and T

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, LHC benchmark scenarios for the real Higgs singlet extension of the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 268, arXiv:1601.07880 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Robens, T

    T. Robens, T. Stefaniak, and J. Wittbrodt, Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 151, arXiv:1908.08554 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, and A. Thamm,Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP12(2017) 044, arXiv:1708.00443 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Haisch, J

    U. Haisch, J. F. Kamenik, A. Malinauskas, and M. Spira, Collider constraints on light pseudoscalars, JHEP03 (2018) 178, arXiv:1802.02156 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Evans and P

    L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3 (2008) S08001

    2008

  19. [26]

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman,Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning, Phys. Rept.841(2020) 1, arXiv: 1709.04464 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS flavour-tagging algorithms for the LHC Run 2𝑝𝑝 collision dataset, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 681, arXiv:2211.16345 [physics.data-an]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of a soft secondary vertex tagger using proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 032015, arXiv: 2405.03253 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a𝑊 boson and decaying to four𝑏-quarks via two spin-zero particles in𝑝𝑝 collisions at13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 605, arXiv:1606.08391 [hep-ex]. 41

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying into two spin-zero particles in the𝐻→𝑎𝑎→ 4𝑏 channel in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2018) 031, arXiv:1806.07355 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs boson decays into two new low-mass spin-0 particles in the 4𝑏 channel with the ATLAS detector using𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 112006, arXiv:2005.12236 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP06 (2024) 097, arXiv:2403.10341 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new light gauge bosons in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 092001, arXiv:1505.07645 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP06(2018) 166, arXiv: 1802.03388 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs bosons decaying into new spin-0 or spin-1 particles in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector with139fb−1 of𝑝𝑝 collision data at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP03 (2022) 041, arXiv:2110.13673 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs bosons decaying to𝑎𝑎 in the𝜇𝜇𝜏𝜏 final state in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 052002, arXiv: 1505.01609 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two𝜏 leptons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP11 (2018) 018, arXiv:1805.04865 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the125GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135087, arXiv:1907.07235 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boosted𝜇𝜇𝜏𝜏 final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP08 (2020) 139, arXiv:2005.08694 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125GeV scalar boson and decaying into𝜏 leptons in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV, JHEP01 (2016) 079, arXiv:1510.06534 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-𝜏 final state at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, (2025), arXiv: 2503.05463 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the𝑏𝑏𝜇𝜇 final state in𝑝𝑝 collision at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B790 (2019) 1, arXiv: 1807.00539 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the 𝑏𝑏𝜇𝜇 final state with the ATLAS detector in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 012006, arXiv:2110.00313 [hep-ex]. 42

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for light bosons in decays of the125GeV Higgs boson in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV, JHEP10(2017) 076, arXiv:1701.02032 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two b quarks in𝑝𝑝 collisions at13TeV, Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 398, arXiv:1812.06359 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two𝑏 quarks and two𝜏 leptons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B785(2018) 462, arXiv:1805.10191 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in the 𝜇𝜇𝑏𝑏 and𝜏𝜏𝑏𝑏 final states, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 493, arXiv:2402.13358 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for decays of the Higgs boson into a pair of pseudoscalar particles decaying into𝑏 ¯𝑏𝜏+𝜏− using𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 052013, arXiv:2407.01335 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for new phenomena in events with at least three photons collected in 𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 210, arXiv: 1509.05051 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP07 (2023) 148, arXiv:2208.01469 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for exotic Higgs boson decays𝐻→AA→ 4𝛾 with events containing two merged diphotons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 101801, arXiv:2209.06197 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the𝛾𝛾𝑗𝑗 final state in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 750, arXiv:1803.11145 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003

    2008

  48. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    2010

  49. [57]

    Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    2018

  51. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]. 43

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70 (2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    2003

  59. [67]

    Sjöstrand, S

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [68]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball, et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    2016

  62. [70]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP10 (2013) 222, arXiv:1309.0017 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, and G. Zanderighi, Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator, JHEP05 (2015) 140, arXiv:1501.04637 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11 (2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11 (2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Frixione, P

    S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11 (2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  67. [75]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball, et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04 (2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [76]

    de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4

    D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝑍/𝛾∗ boson transverse momentum distribution in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP09 (2014) 145, arXiv: 1406.3660 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7 TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

    2014

  71. [79]

    Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7 (2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7 (2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]. 44

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Gleisberg and S

    T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12(2008) 039, arXiv: 0808.3674 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Cascioli, P

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer, and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Schumann and F

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03(2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv: 1111.1220 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Catani, F

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber, and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

    2001 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann, and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation, Nucl. Phys. B855(2012) 695, arXiv:1109.1536 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Cacciari, M

    M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov, and P. Nason,Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation, Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 612, arXiv:1111.5869 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Bärnreuther, M

    P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov,Percent-Level-Precision Physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to𝑞 ¯𝑞→𝑡¯𝑡+𝑋, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 132001, arXiv:1204.5201 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Czakon and A

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov,NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels, JHEP12(2012) 054, arXiv:1207.0236 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Czakon and A

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction, JHEP01(2013) 080, arXiv:1210.6832 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Czakon, P

    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO(𝛼4 𝑆), Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 252004, arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Czakon and A

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2930, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a𝑊− or𝐻−, Phys

    N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a𝑊− or𝐻−, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 054018, arXiv:1005.4451 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Aliev et al.,HATHOR – HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR, Comput

    M. Aliev et al.,HATHOR – HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 1034, arXiv:1007.1327 [hep-ph]. 45

    2011 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Kant et al.,HatHor for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions, Comput

    P. Kant et al.,HatHor for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 74, arXiv:1406.4403 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Anastasiou, L

    C. Anastasiou, L. Dixon, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello,High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 094008, arXiv:hep-ph/0312266

    2004 arXiv

  90. [98]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of Higgs boson decay into𝑏-quarks in associated production with a top-quark pair in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06 (2022) 097, arXiv:2111.06712 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  92. [100]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [101]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠= 13TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    2015

  94. [102]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14 (2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon efficiencies in LHC Run 2 with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP05 (2024) 162, arXiv:2308.13362 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 2 data, JINST19(2024) P02009, arXiv:2309.05471 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 072003, arXiv:1712.08891 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [106]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝𝑝 collision data set at√𝑠= 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Evidence for the𝐻→𝑏 ¯𝑏 decay with the ATLAS detector, JHEP12(2017) 024, arXiv:1708.03299 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Cacciari and G

    M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam,Dispelling the𝑁3 myth for the𝑘𝑡 jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B641(2006) 57, arXiv:hep-ph/0512210

    2006 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  102. [110]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 8TeV using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 581, arXiv: 1510.03823 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  103. [111]

    ATLAS Collaboration, New techniques for jet calibration with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 761, arXiv:2303.17312 [hep-ex]. 46

    2023 arXiv

  104. [112]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 689, arXiv: 2007.02645 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Nachman, P

    B. Nachman, P. Nef, A. Schwartzman, M. Swiatlowski, and C. Wanotayaroj, Jets from Jets: Re-clustering as a tool for large radius jet reconstruction and grooming at the LHC, JHEP02 (2015) 075, arXiv:1407.2922 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Cacciari and G

    M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam,Pileup subtraction using jet areas, Phys. Lett. B659 (2008) 119, arXiv: 0707.1378 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  107. [115]

    S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper,Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 3160, arXiv:hep-ph/9305266

    1993 arXiv

  108. [116]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Variable Radius, Exclusive-𝑘𝑇, and Center-of-Mass Subjet Reconstruction for Higgs(→𝑏 ¯𝑏) Tagging in ATLAS, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-010, 2017, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2268678

    2017

  109. [117]

    P. J. Huber,Robust estimation of a location parameter, Ann. Math. Stat.35(1964) 73

    1964

  110. [118]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Secondary vertex finding for jet flavour identification with the ATLAS detector, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-011, 2017,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2270366

    2017

  111. [119]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS𝑏-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with𝑡¯𝑡 events in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 970, arXiv: 1907.05120 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the𝑐-jet mistagging efficiency in𝑡¯𝑡 events using𝑝𝑝 collision data at√𝑠= 13TeV collected with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 95, arXiv: 2109.10627 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  113. [121]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of the light-flavour jet mistagging efficiency of the𝑏-tagging algorithms with𝑍+jets events using139fb−1 of ATLAS proton–proton collision data at√𝑠= 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 728, arXiv:2301.06319 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  114. [122]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction and its significance with the ATLAS detector using140fb−1 of√𝑠= 13TeV𝑝𝑝 collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 606, arXiv:2402.05858 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  115. [123]

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Angular Distribution of Dileptons in High-Energy Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 2219

    1977

  116. [124]

    XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,

    T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,”Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16, San Francisco, California, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016 785, url: https://doi.org/...

    2016

  117. [125]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the𝑡¯𝑡𝑡 ¯𝑡 production cross section in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11(2021) 118, arXiv:2106.11683 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [126]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark and a bottom quark at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06(2021) 145, arXiv: 2102.10076 [hep-ex]. 47

    2021 arXiv

  119. [127]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of𝑡¯𝑡 production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP04 (2019) 046, arXiv:1811.12113 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [128]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the Inelastic Proton–Proton Cross Section at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 182002, arXiv: 1606.02625 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  121. [129]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the missing transverse momentum triggers for the ATLAS detector during Run-2 data taking, JHEP08(2020) 080, arXiv:2005.09554 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  122. [130]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Early Inner Detector Tracking Performance in the 2015 Data at√𝑠= 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-051, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2110140

    2015

  123. [131]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Study of top-quark pair modelling and uncertainties using ATLAS measurements at√𝑠= 13TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2020-023, 2020,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2730443

    2020

  124. [132]

    Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J

    J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G43 (2016) 023001, arXiv: 1510.03865 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  125. [133]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Modelling and computational improvements to the simulation of single vector-boson plus jet processes for the ATLAS experiment, JHEP08(2022) 089, arXiv: 2112.09588 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  126. [134]

    F. Cascioli et al.,Precise Higgs-background predictions: merging NLO QCD and squared quark-loop corrections to four-lepton + 0,1 jet production, JHEP01(2014) 046, arXiv: 1309.0500 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Bothmann, M

    E. Bothmann, M. Schönherr, and S. Schumann, Reweighting QCD matrix-element and parton-shower calculations, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 590, arXiv: 1606.08753 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Moneta et al.,The RooStats Project, PoSACAT2010(2011) 057, arXiv: 1009.1003 [physics.data-an]

    L. Moneta et al.,The RooStats Project, PoSACAT2010(2011) 057, arXiv: 1009.1003 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  129. [137]

    TRExFitter documentation, url: https://trexfitter-docs.web.cern.ch/trexfitter-docs/

  130. [138]

    Verkerke and D

    W. Verkerke and D. Kirkby,The RooFit toolkit for data modeling, 2003, arXiv: physics/0306116 [physics.data-an]

    2003 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2501

    2011 arXiv

  132. [140]

    A. L. Read,Presentation of search results: the𝐶𝐿𝑠 technique, J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693

    2002

  133. [141]

    Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nucl

    T. Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    1999 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Higgs Properties, (2013), arXiv: 1307.1347 [hep-ph]

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties, (2013), arXiv: 1307.1347 [hep-ph]. 48

    2013 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Gross and O

    E. Gross and O. Vitells,Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics, Eur. Phys. J. C70 (2010) 525, arXiv:1005.1891 [physics.data-an]

    2010 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Vitells and E

    O. Vitells and E. Gross,Estimating the significance of a signal in a multi-dimensional search, Astropart. Phys.35 (2011) 230, arXiv:1105.4355 [astro-ph.IM]

    2011 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2922210. 49 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 104, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 123, S. Abdelhameed 119a, K. Abeling 55, N.J. Abicht 49, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 45, A...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.