Coupled Cluster Downfolding Theory in Simulations of Chemical Systems on Quantum Hardware

Ajay Panyala; Ang Li; Bo Peng; Chenxu Liu; Karol Kowalski; Muqing Zheng; Nathan M. Myers; Nicholas P. Bauman

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Coupled Cluster Downfolding Theory in Simulations of Chemical Systems on Quantum Hardware

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper's central claim is that downfolded effective Hamiltonians turn hundreds of orbitals into a 12-qubit problem that still captures nearly all chemical correlation energy.

desk verdict Genuine hardware demonstration of downfolded quantum chemistry, with an acknowledged but uncontrolled approximation that deserves careful scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01199 v3 pith:57UAY4GI submitted 2025-07-01 quant-ph

Nicholas P. Bauman , Muqing Zheng , Chenxu Liu , Nathan M. Myers , Ajay Panyala , Bo Peng , Ang Li , Karol Kowalski This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords coupledclusterdownfoldingeffectiveHamiltonianquantumchemistryonhardwarevariationaleigensolverqubit-ADAPT-VQEactivespacedynamicalcorrelationNISQalgorithms

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum simulation of chemistry on today's hardware is limited by qubit count and circuit depth. This paper argues that coupled-cluster downfolding removes that bottleneck: classical computation first builds a small effective Hamiltonian that has hundreds of orbitals' worth of dynamical correlation folded into a (6e,6o) active space, and quantum solvers then diagonalize it. For benzene in cc-pVTZ and free-base porphyrin in cc-pVDZ, the pipeline recovers nearly all of the CCSD(T) correlation energy, while the same active space with the bare Hamiltonian recovers only about 3% and under 1%. The paper presents this as 'accuracy amplification': the downfolded effective Hamiltonian gives better energies than the classical CCSD calculation that supplied its amplitudes, on noisy as well as noiseless hardware. The result matters because it suggests current devices can address chemically meaningful problems without waiting for fault tolerance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double unitary coupled-cluster (DUCC) effective Hamiltonian in its DUCC(3)-A(7) approximation, defined by a finite commutator expansion $$\bar H_{\mathrm{ext}}^{A(7)} = H + [H_N, \sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}] + \frac12[[H_N,\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}],\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}] + \frac16[[[F_N,\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}],\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}],\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}],$$ where $H_N$ and $F_N$ are the normal-ordered Hamiltonian and Fock operator and $\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}$ is an anti-Hermitian operator carrying at least one inactive orbital index. The paper approximates $\sigma_{\mathrm{ext}}$ with amplitudes from a standard CCSD calculation and keeps only scalar, one-body, and two-body terms in the active space. This object carries the argument because its lowest eigenvalue is meant to reproduce the full-system ground state while the quantum solver acts only on the six-active-electron, six-active-orbital Hilbert space, a 12-qubit problem under the Jordan-Wigner mapping.

What would settle it

Replace the CCSD t-amplitudes used in Eq. (A4) with amplitudes from a variationally optimized unitary coupled-cluster calculation in the same orbitals and recompute the downfolded (6e,6o) FCI energy for N2 at 2.0 Re; if the discrepancy against CCSD(T) stays near the reported 160 milliHartree, the DUCC(3)-A(7) truncation itself is the limiting error, while if it shrinks, the paper's reuse of non-unitary amplitudes is the identified failure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the DUCC(3)-A(7) downfolded Hamiltonian, evaluated in a six-electron, six-orbital active space and solved by variational quantum algorithms, recovers the dominant fraction of dynamical correlation energy for realistic molecules. For benzene in cc-pVTZ and free-base porphyrin in cc-pVDZ, noiseless simulators essentially reproduce the active-space FCI energy, and hardware runs with error mitigation land within tens of milliHartree of CCSD(T), about 17 milliHartree for benzene. This is contrasted with bare-Hamiltonian active-space treatments, which recover only about 3% and under 1% of the correlation energy. The authors also report that the approximation degrades when static correlation dominates: for N2 at twice its equilibrium bond length, the downfolded FCI energy differs from CCSD(T) by roughly 160 milliHartree.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unitary operator used to fold distant orbitals into the active space can be accurately built from the same amplitudes that come out of a standard non-unitary coupled-cluster calculation; if that transfer fails, the small Hamiltonian no longer describes the real molecule, and the paper supplies no error bound for it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bare-Hamiltonian active-space simulations, the standard quantum-chemistry-on-quantum-computers model, recover only about 3% of the correlation energy for benzene and under 1% for free-base porphyrin; downfolding is presented as a practical remedy.
With the downfolded Hamiltonian, all tested noiseless solvers essentially reproduce the active-space FCI energy, and hardware results with error mitigation are within about 17 milliHartree of CCSD(T) for benzene.
The pipeline delivers accuracy amplification: hardware energies can be closer to CCSD(T) than the CCSD energies that supplied the external amplitudes, so the quantum step adds real accuracy rather than just repeating the classical input.
The DUCC(3)-A(7) effective Hamiltonian is a deliberately simplified form; the paper reports that adding three-body terms improves strongly correlated cases, so the present results can be read as a conservative estimate of the approach's accuracy.
Because the method is designed to accommodate larger active spaces as hardware improves, it offers a scaling path from noisy intermediate-scale devices toward fault-tolerant quantum chemistry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A decisive follow-up experiment would rebuild Eq. (A4) with amplitudes from a genuinely unitary coupled-cluster optimization; this isolates whether the N2 stretch failure comes from using non-unitary CCSD amplitudes or from the commutator truncation.
Because the downfolded Hamiltonian is Hermitian and size-extensive in the DUCC ansatz, the same library of effective Hamiltonians could be reused for excited states or embedded Green's functions without new hardware, an extension the paper leaves implicit.
The reported error budget separates Pauli-string truncation, device noise, and DUCC truncation; one could turn that decomposition into a predictive rule for choosing active-space size and DUCC order per molecule.
The accuracy amplification effect suggests that classical coupled-cluster amplitudes might serve as a general preconditioner for quantum eigensolvers in other fermionic simulations, not just molecular chemistry.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The short version: this paper is a genuine hardware demonstration of a downfolding pipeline for quantum chemistry, and the data hold up for the systems tested. But the central approximation—using CCSD amplitudes in the unitary downfolding operator—has no error bound, and the paper's own N2(2.0Re) result shows it can break badly. That's a real caveat, not a fatal one, because the authors are transparent about it and scope their claims to dynamical-correlation-dominated systems.

What's actually new: the QRDR pipeline, integrating DUCC(3)-A(7) downfolded Hamiltonians with several quantum solvers and running them on Quantinuum H1-1 and IBM devices. The hardware energies for benzene/cc-pVTZ and free-base porphyrin/cc-pVDZ sit within 17–76 mH of CCSD(T), while bare active-space CCSD(T)(6e,6o) recovers only 3% and <1% of the correlation energy. The noiseless simulators exactly reproduce the FCI of the downfolded Hamiltonians, which gives confidence in the solver implementations. The paper also ships code and data (ExaChem, SymGen, DUCC Hamiltonian library), which is real evidence.

Soft spots, in order of importance. First, the sigma_ext approximation: the paper says (Section III.A) that sigma_ext is built from standard CCSD amplitudes, not the unitary amplitudes that would make Eq. (1) exact. No error bound or diagnostic is given. Table III shows N2 at 2.0Re: the downfolded FCI energy is -108.9842, missing CCSD(T) by ~160 mH, and no better than the source CCSD energy. This tells you the approximation has a failure mode. It doesn't invalidate the benzene/FBP results, but it means the 'accuracy amplification' is empirical, not guaranteed. The paper acknowledges this in the Outlook, but a reader would want a criterion for when to trust it.

Second, the hardware runs are one-shot, with limited shots and vendor-reported specifications. The ZNE result matches the noiseless value well for benzene, but the claim is a single number, not a systematic study. Minor: the Pauli-group truncation errors (0.4 and 5.9 mH) are small but not negligible compared to the 17.1 mH target gap.

Overall, this is a solid, well-scoped demonstration. The core theory is from earlier papers, but the end-to-end hardware integration is new and useful. It should go to peer review—a referee will want to probe the sigma_ext approximation and the error analysis, but the paper is honest about its limitations and gives enough detail to be checked.

Bring it to reading group? Yes. I'd cite it as a hardware demonstration of downfolding-based quantum chemistry.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a hybrid quantum-classical pipeline, QRDR, in which coupled-cluster downfolding (DUCC(3)-A(7)) is used to construct small (6e,6o) active-space effective Hamiltonians for N2, benzene, and free-base porphyrin, followed by quantum solutions using ADAPT-VQE, qubit-ADAPT-VQE, ADAPT-GCIM, and UCCGSD on noiseless simulators and on Quantinuum and IBM hardware. The central results are that for dynamical-correlation-dominated systems the downfolded active-space simulations recover a large fraction (about 98%) of the CCSD(T) correlation energy, vastly exceeding bare-Hamiltonian (6e,6o) simulations, and that hardware results with error mitigation match CCSD(T) to within 17-76 mH. The paper also introduces the concept of 'accuracy amplification' over the CCSD source energies used to define the effective Hamiltonian.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating a concrete pipeline for compressing realistic-basis molecular problems into few-qubit effective Hamiltonians that can be handled by current devices. The strengths are the public code and data (ExaChem, SymGen, NWQSim, DUCC-Hamiltonian-Library), the exact reproduction of the effective-Hamiltonian FCI by all noiseless simulators, and the transparent reporting of one-shot hardware runs, Pauli-group truncation errors, and ZNE procedures. The principal weakness is that the key approximation—replacing the exact unitary cluster operator sigma_ext by non-unitary CCSD amplitudes—is uncontrolled, and the paper includes a counterexample (N2 at 2.0Re) where the approximation breaks down badly.

major comments (2)

[Section III A, item (ii), Eq. (A4)] The approximation of sigma_ext by amplitudes taken from standard, non-unitary CCSD calculations is load-bearing for the central claim, but the paper provides no proof, error bound, or a posteriori estimate for this step. The N2(2.0Re) row of Table III shows the failure mode: the downfolded FCI energy (-108.9842 Hartree) lies 160.6 mH above the CCSD(T) reference (-109.1448 Hartree, Table I) and only 16.1 mH below the CCSD source energy (-108.9681 Hartree). Because no diagnostic is offered to predict when the transfer of CCSD t-amplitudes to sigma_ext is safe, the agreement observed for benzene (17.1 mH) and FBP (46.0 mH in the noiseless FCI) could be partly fortuitous. I recommend adding a systematic validation, such as comparisons with exact unitary CC amplitudes on small systems, or an error estimator that can be reported for each effective Hamiltonian.
[Section I, Abstract, and Section IV (Outlook)] The paper's claim of 'accuracy amplification' relative to the CCSD source energy is not universal: for N2 at 2.0Re the amplification is only 16.1 mH while the error to the CCSD(T) target is 160.6 mH, so the method does not always improve on its classical input. The abstract and outlook should be scoped to dynamical-correlation-dominated systems, and the limitations for strongly correlated regimes should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only appearing indirectly through the solver comparisons. As written, a reader could reasonably infer that the downfolded effective Hamiltonian generically recovers the target correlation energy, which the N2(2.0Re) data contradict.

minor comments (5)

[Table III] The column header 'FCI' should be clarified as 'FCI of the downfolded effective Hamiltonian in the (6e,6o) active space' to avoid any confusion with full-space FCI.
[Table IV] The header contains the typo 'Quantinum' for 'Quantinuum' in two places (left column of each panel); please correct.
[Section II and Fig. 1] The paper uses a (6e,6o) active space for all systems but does not specify which six RHF orbitals are active; please state the active orbital selection or refer to the repository for the exact definitions, since this is necessary for reproducibility.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A4)] The commutator expansion is truncated at third order, but the rationale for retaining only the triple commutator with the Fock operator and dropping higher-order terms is not discussed; a brief comment on the expected convergence of the BCH series for these systems would be helpful.
[Section III F, Fig. 4] For the ZNE linear regressions, the number of noise-amplification points and the error bars on the noise factors are not reported; please include these details for reproducibility and to support the reported R² values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DUCC(3)-A(7) effective-Hamiltonian energies are evaluated from a stated formula, not from a fit to the benchmark targets.

full rationale

The central pipeline is self-contained: Eq. (A4) defines the DUCC(3)-A(7) effective Hamiltonian from the bare Hamiltonian and a finite commutator expansion, with σ_ext approximated by standard CCSD amplitudes (Section III A, item (ii)). The reported energies are eigenvalues of that transformed Hamiltonian, not the CCSD energy expression, and they are compared against independent CCSD(T), CCSDTQ, and FCI benchmarks. The N2(2.0Re) result, where the downfolded FCI energy (-108.9842) misses CCSD(T) (-109.1448) by about 160 mH, demonstrates that the procedure does not reproduce its input by construction and can fail outside its stated dynamical-correlation-dominated regime. No parameter is fitted to the CCSD(T) or FCI targets, and the accuracy amplification over CCSD is a post-hoc numerical observation, not a fitted claim. Self-citations to prior DUCC and GCIM work are present, including Ref. 78 for the DUCC(3)-A(7) approximation, but the necessary definition is reproduced in Appendix A and the energy comparisons are made against independent benchmarks, so these self-citations are not load-bearing. Thus the derivation has independent content and no circular reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The results depend on the DUCC downfolding formalism from the authors' prior publications and on several uncontrolled approximations (CCSD amplitudes in a unitary ansatz, truncated commutator expansion, one- and two-body-only effective Hamiltonian). The free parameters are choices of active space, Pauli-group truncation, and commutator order, none of which are fitted to the CCSD(T) target energies. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

Active space size (6e,6o) = 6 electrons, 6 orbitals
Chosen for quantum hardware constraints, not fitted to target energies; all systems use the same active space.
Pauli-group truncation counts = benzene: 39/116 groups (143/371 strings); FBP: 59/210 groups (311/735 strings)
Selected by largest coefficient magnitudes to fit credit limits; truncation errors are reported as 0.4 and 5.9 mH, so they are not fitted to the target energy.
DUCC(3)-A(7) commutator truncation order = 3 (finite commutator expansion, one- and two-body terms)
Chosen as an approximation from Ref. 78; affects accuracy but is not fitted to data.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption DUCC factorization of the exact wavefunction as exp(sigma_int) exp(sigma_ext) applied to the reference, with sigma_ext containing at least one inactive index.
Refs. 54-55; invoked in Section III A, Eq. (1).
ad hoc to paper External amplitudes for sigma_ext are taken from standard (non-unitary) CCSD calculations.
Section III A item (ii) explicitly approximates the unitary sigma_ext using CCSD amplitudes; this transferability is uncontrolled and is the main source of system-dependent error.
ad hoc to paper The commutator expansion is truncated at third order with terms restricted to one- and two-body interactions (DUCC(3)-A(7)).
Eq. (A4) defines the finite-rank approximation; the truncation and rank restriction are pragmatic choices, not systematically improved in this work.
domain assumption Active space is defined by RHF orbitals.
Section II states effective Hamiltonians are constructed in active spaces defined by RHF orbitals; orbital choice affects the downfolding quality.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coupled Cluster Downfolding Theory in Simulations of Chemical Systems on Quantum Hardware." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57UAY4GI

@misc{pith2026250701199,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coupled Cluster Downfolding Theory in Simulations of Chemical Systems on Quantum Hardware},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57UAY4GI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01199}
}

read the original abstract

The practical application of quantum technologies to chemical problems faces significant challenges, particularly in the treatment of realistic basis sets and the accurate inclusion of electron correlation effects. A direct approach to these problems is currently infeasible due to limitations in the number of logical qubits, their fidelity, and the shallow circuit depths supported by existing hardware; all of which hinder simulations at the required level of accuracy. A promising alternative is hybrid quantum-classical computing, where classical resources are used to construct effective Hamiltonians characterized by dimensions that conform to the constraints of current quantum devices. In this paper, we demonstrate the performance of a hybrid approach: coupled-cluster downfolded Hamiltonians are first evaluated in reduced-dimensionality active spaces, and the corresponding ground-state energies are subsequently computed using quantum algorithms. Our comprehensive analysis explores the achievable accuracy in recovering correlation energies when hundreds of orbitals are downfolded into a problem size tractable by today's quantum hardware. We argue that such flexible hybrid algorithms, where problem size can be tailored to available quantum resources, can serve as a bridge between noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices and future fault-tolerant quantum computers, marking a step toward the early realization of quantum advantage in chemistry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01199 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Coupled cluster downfolding formalism to reduce the dimensionality of the quantum problem. Brute-force approaches for solving electronic Hamiltonians defined by large basis sets are not feasible with current quantum hardware. As an alternative, a downfolding procedure can be employed to construct effective (downfolded) Hamiltonians (H eff) within low-dimensional complete active spaces (CASs) that are suitable for ex… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Structure of the correlation effects in the benzene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Overview of the evolution of the DUCC family of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Energy estimates from the Quantinuum H1-1 emulator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a) Typical Hugenholtz diagram contributing to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Machine-Learned Compact Subspace Generation for Quantum Selected Configuration Interaction within Density Matrix Embedding Framework
quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

An RBM-guided selected-CI solver inside DMET reaches the DMET-CASCI energy within 1.6 mHa using ~4% of the symmetry-valid configuration subspace on an 11-fragment protein–ligand model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Coester ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 journal journal Nucl

author author F. Coester ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 journal journal Nucl. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 421 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

doi:10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 1958
[2]

C \' z ek ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1727484 journal journal J

author author J. C \' z ek ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1727484 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 4256 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.1727484 1966
[3]

Raghavachari , author G

author author K. Raghavachari , author G. W. \ Trucks , author J. A. \ Pople , \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(89)87395-6 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 157 ,\ pages 479 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6
[4]

author author R. J. \ Bartlett \ and\ author M. Musia ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 291 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 2007
[5]

Lee , author W

author author C. Lee , author W. Yang , \ and\ author R. G. \ Parr ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review B \ volume 37 ,\ pages 785 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988
[6]

author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke , \ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

1996
[7]

author author R. O. \ Jones ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of modern physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 897 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[8]

Knizia \ and\ author G

author author G. Knizia \ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 109 ,\ pages 186404 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012

Show all 135 references

[9]

Wouters , author C

author author S. Wouters , author C. A. \ Jim \'e nez-Hoyos , author Q. Sun , \ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of chemical theory and computation \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2706 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[10]

Hedin ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 139 ,\ pages A796 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

author author L. Hedin ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 139 ,\ pages A796 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

1965
[11]

Aryasetiawan \ and\ author O

author author F. Aryasetiawan \ and\ author O. Gunnarsson ,\ @noop journal journal Reports on progress in Physics \ volume 61 ,\ pages 237 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

1998
[12]

author author M. J. \ Van Setten , author F. Caruso , author S. Sharifzadeh , author X. Ren , author M. Scheffler , author F. Liu , author J. Lischner , author L. Lin , author J. R. \ Deslippe , author S. G. \ Louie , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory ...

2015
[13]

author author J. J. \ Rehr , author J. J. \ Kas , author F. D. \ Vila , author M. P. \ Prange , \ and\ author K. Jorissen ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 5503 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010
[14]

author author A. M. \ Teale , author T. Helgaker , author A. Savin , author C. Adamo , author B. Aradi , author A. V. \ Arbuznikov , author P. W. \ Ayers , author E. J. \ Baerends , author V. Barone , author P. Calaminici , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical chemistry ch...

2022
[15]

Menczer , author M

author author A. Menczer , author M. van Damme , author A. Rask , author L. Huntington , author J. Hammond , author S. S. \ Xantheas , author M. Ganahl , \ and\ author O. Legeza ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 20 ,\ pages 8397 ( yea...

2024
[16]

author author T. S. \ Haugland , author E. Ronca , author E. F. \ Kj nstad , author A. Rubio , \ and\ author H. Koch ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 041043 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[17]

author author S. H. \ Yuwono , author R. R. \ Li , author T. Zhang , author K. A. \ Surjuse , author E. F. \ Valeev , author X. Li , \ and\ author A. Eugene DePrince III ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 128 ,\ pages 6521 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[18]

author author Z. W. \ Windom , author D. Claudino , \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 160 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[19]

Gururangan , author J

author author K. Gururangan , author J. Shen , \ and\ author P. Piecuch ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 862 ,\ pages 141840 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[20]

author author N. M. \ Tubman , author J. Lee , author T. Y. \ Takeshita , author M. Head-Gordon , \ and\ author K. B. \ Whaley ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 145 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[21]

author author J. B. \ Schriber \ and\ author F. A. \ Evangelista ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 144 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[22]

Abraham \ and\ author N

author author V. Abraham \ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 16 ,\ pages 6098 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[23]

Abraham \ and\ author N

author author V. Abraham \ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 18 ,\ pages 4856 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[24]

van Schilfgaarde , author T

author author M. van Schilfgaarde , author T. Kotani , \ and\ author S. Faleev ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 96 ,\ pages 226402 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006
[25]

Deslippe , author G

author author J. Deslippe , author G. Samsonidze , author D. A. \ Strubbe , author M. Jain , author M. L. \ Cohen , \ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ @noop journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 183 ,\ pages 1269 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012
[26]

author author C. C. \ Reeves , author G. Harsha , author A. Shee , author Y. Zhu , author T. Blommel , author C. Yang , author K. B. \ Whaley , author D. Zgid , \ and\ author V. Vl c ek ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 7 ,\ pages 023002 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[27]

author author G. H. \ Booth , author A. Gr \"u neis , author G. Kresse , \ and\ author A. Alavi ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 493 ,\ pages 365 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013
[28]

author author I. Y. \ Zhang \ and\ author A. Gr \"u neis ,\ @noop journal journal Frontiers in Materials \ volume 6 ,\ pages 123 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019
[29]

McClain , author Q

author author J. McClain , author Q. Sun , author G. K.-L. \ Chan , \ and\ author T. C. \ Berkelbach ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1209 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[30]

\ Ye \ and\ author T

author author H.-Z. \ Ye \ and\ author T. C. \ Berkelbach ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 20 ,\ pages 8948 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[31]

Hagen , author G

author author G. Hagen , author G. R. \ Jansen , \ and\ author T. Papenbrock ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 117 ,\ pages 172501 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[32]

author author M. A. \ Nielsen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ @noop title Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition ,\ edition 10th \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address New York, NY, USA ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

2011
[33]

author author A. Y. \ Kitaev ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint quant-ph/9511026 \ ( year 1995 ) NoStop

1995 arXiv
[34]

author author A. Y. \ Kitaev ,\ 10.1070/RM1997v052n06ABEH002155 journal journal Russ. Math. Surv. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 1191 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

1997 doi
[35]

author author D. S. \ Abrams \ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 5162 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

1999
[36]

author author A. M. \ Childs ,\ 10.1007/s00220-009-0930-1 journal journal Comm. Math. Phys. \ volume 294 ,\ pages 581 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010 doi
[37]

Reiher , author N

author author M. Reiher , author N. Wiebe , author K. M. \ Svore , author D. Wecker , \ and\ author M. Troyer ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 7555 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[38]

Aspuru-Guzik , author A

author author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author A. D. \ Dutoi , author P. J. \ Love , \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 309 ,\ pages 1704 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

2005
[39]

Wecker , author B

author author D. Wecker , author B. Bauer , author B. K. \ Clark , author M. B. \ Hastings , \ and\ author M. Troyer ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 90 ,\ pages 022305 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014
[40]

Wiebe \ and\ author C

author author N. Wiebe \ and\ author C. Granade ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 117 ,\ pages 010503 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[41]

Santagati , author J

author author R. Santagati , author J. Wang , author A. A. \ Gentile , author S. Paesani , author N. Wiebe , author J. R. \ McClean , author S. Morley-Short , author P. J. \ Shadbolt , author D. Bonneau , author J. W. \ Silverstone , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Science adv...

2018
[42]

McArdle , author S

author author S. McArdle , author S. Endo , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author S. C. \ Benjamin , \ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[43]

Klymko , author C

author author K. Klymko , author C. Mejuto-Zaera , author S. J. \ Cotton , author F. Wudarski , author M. Urbanek , author D. Hait , author M. Head-Gordon , author K. B. \ Whaley , author J. Moussa , author N. Wiebe , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 3 ,\ p...

2022
[44]

Peruzzo , author J

author author A. Peruzzo , author J. R. \ McClean , author P. Shadbolt , author M.-H. \ Yung , author X.-Q. \ Zhou , author P. J. \ Love , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , \ and\ author J. L. \ O'Brien ,\ 10.1038/ncomms5213 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 4213 ( year ...

doi
[45]

author author J. R. \ McClean , author J. Romero , author R. Babbush , \ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 023023 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016 doi
[46]

Romero , author R

author author J. Romero , author R. Babbush , author J. R. \ McClean , author C. Hempel , author P. J. \ Love , \ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ 10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 journal journal Quantum Sci. Technol. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 014008 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[47]

Shen , author X

author author Y. Shen , author X. Zhang , author S. Zhang , author J.-N. \ Zhang , author M.-H. \ Yung , \ and\ author K. Kim ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.020501 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 020501 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi
[48]

Kandala , author A

author author A. Kandala , author A. Mezzacapo , author K. Temme , author M. Takita , author M. Brink , author J. M. \ Chow , \ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 549 ,\ pages 242 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[49]

Kandala , author K

author author A. Kandala , author K. Temme , author A. D. \ Corcoles , author A. Mezzacapo , author J. M. \ Chow , \ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 567 ,\ pages 491 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019
[50]

author author J. I. \ Colless , author V. V. \ Ramasesh , author D. Dahlen , author M. S. \ Blok , author M. E. \ Kimchi-Schwartz , author J. R. \ McClean , author J. Carter , author W. A. \ de Jong , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011021 journal journal Phys. ...

doi
[51]

author author W. J. \ Huggins , author J. Lee , author U. Baek , author B. O'Gorman , \ and\ author K. B. \ Whaley ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ab867b journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 073009 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[52]

Cao , author J

author author Y. Cao , author J. Romero , author J. P. \ Olson , author M. Degroote , author P. D. \ Johnson , author M. Kieferov \'a , author I. D. \ Kivlichan , author T. Menke , author B. Peropadre , author N. P. \ Sawaya , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \...

2019
[53]

Weaving , author A

author author T. Weaving , author A. Ralli , author P. J. \ Love , author S. Succi , \ and\ author P. V. \ Coveney ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 11 ,\ pages 25 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[54]

author author N. P. \ Bauman , author E. J. \ Bylaska , author S. Krishnamoorthy , author G. H. \ Low , author N. Wiebe , author C. E. \ Granade , author M. Roetteler , author M. Troyer , \ and\ author K. Kowalski ,\ 10.1063/1.5094643 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 15...

doi
[55]

Kowalski \ and\ author N

author author K. Kowalski \ and\ author N. P. \ Bauman ,\ 10.1063/5.0008436 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 152 ,\ pages 244127 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[56]

Huang , author C

author author R. Huang , author C. Li , \ and\ author F. A. \ Evangelista ,\ @noop journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 020313 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[57]

Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal J

author author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 148 ,\ pages 094104 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[58]

Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

author author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 104 ,\ pages 032804 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[59]

Feldmann , author M

author author R. Feldmann , author M. M \"o rchen , author J. Lang , author M. Lesiuk , \ and\ author M. Reiher ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 128 ,\ pages 8615 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[60]

Peng \ and\ author K

author author B. Peng \ and\ author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal Electronic Structure \ volume 6 ,\ pages 015005 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[61]

Shee , author F

author author A. Shee , author F. M. \ Faulstich , author K. B. \ Whaley , author L. Lin , \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 161 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[62]

author author M. R. \ Hoffmann \ and\ author J. Simons ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 993 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988
[63]

author author R. J. \ Bartlett , author S. A. \ Kucharski , \ and\ author J. Noga ,\ 10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87372-5 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 155 ,\ pages 133 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

1989 doi
[64]

Lee , author W

author author J. Lee , author W. J. \ Huggins , author M. Head-Gordon , \ and\ author K. B. \ Whaley ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of chemical theory and computation \ volume 15 ,\ pages 311 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[65]

author author J. A. \ Pople ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 71 ,\ pages 1267 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

1999
[66]

Kowalski \ and\ author N

author author K. Kowalski \ and\ author N. P. \ Bauman ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 131 ,\ pages 200601 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[67]

Kowalski \ and\ author N

author author K. Kowalski \ and\ author N. P. \ Bauman ,\ @noop journal journal Molecular Physics \ ,\ pages e2489774 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[68]

Zheng , author B

author author M. Zheng , author B. Peng , author N. Wiebe , author A. Li , author X. Yang , \ and\ author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 5 ,\ pages 023200 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[69]

Zheng , author B

author author M. Zheng , author B. Peng , author A. Li , author X. Yang , \ and\ author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[70]

Li , author B

author author A. Li , author B. Fang , author C. Granade , author G. Prawiroatmodjo , author B. Hein , author M. Rotteler , \ and\ author S. Krishnamoorthy ,\ in\ 10.1145/3458817.3476169 booktitle Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Netw...
[71]

author author T. H. \ Dunning Jr ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 1007 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

1989
[72]

author author J. J. \ Eriksen , author T. A. \ Anderson , author J. E. \ Deustua , author K. Ghanem , author D. Hait , author M. R. \ Hoffmann , author S. Lee , author D. S. \ Levine , author I. Magoulas , author J. Shen , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal The journal of physica...

2020
[73]

Kowalski , author S

author author K. Kowalski , author S. Krishnamoorthy , author O. Villa , author J. R. \ Hammond , \ and\ author N. Govind ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 132 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010
[74]

author author G. D. \ Purvis \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.443164 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 1910 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

1910 doi
[75]

author author S. A. \ Kucharski \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ 10.1007/BF01117419 journal journal Theor. Chem. Acc. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 387 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

1991 doi
[76]

Oliphant \ and\ author L

author author N. Oliphant \ and\ author L. Adamowicz ,\ 10.1063/1.461534 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 6645 ( year 1991 a ) NoStop

1991 doi
[77]

Piecuch \ and\ author L

author author P. Piecuch \ and\ author L. Adamowicz ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 100 ,\ pages 5792 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

1994
[78]

author author N. P. \ Bauman \ and\ author K. Kowalski ,\ 10.1063/5.0076260 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 156 ,\ pages 094106 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0076260 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0076260 NoStop

2022 doi
[79]

Apra , author E

author author E. Apra , author E. J. \ Bylaska , author W. A. \ De Jong , author N. Govind , author K. Kowalski , author T. P. \ Straatsma , author M. Valiev , author H. J. \ van Dam , author Y. Alexeev , author J. Anchell , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemi...

2020
[80]

Bloch ,\ @noop journal journal Nuclear Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 329 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

author author C. Bloch ,\ @noop journal journal Nuclear Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 329 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

1958
[81]

Des Cloizeaux ,\ @noop journal journal Nuclear Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 321 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

author author J. Des Cloizeaux ,\ @noop journal journal Nuclear Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 321 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

1960
[82]

\ L \"o wdin ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 10 ,\ pages 12 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

author author P.-O. \ L \"o wdin ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 10 ,\ pages 12 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

1963
[83]

author author J. R. \ Schrieffer \ and\ author P. A. \ Wolff ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 149 ,\ pages 491 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

1966
[84]

Soliverez ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 2161 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

author author C. Soliverez ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 2161 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

1969
[85]

J rgensen ,\ @noop journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1137 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

author author F. J rgensen ,\ @noop journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1137 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

1975
[86]

author author S. D. \ G azek \ and\ author K. G. \ Wilson ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 48 ,\ pages 5863 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

1993
[87]

author author S. B. \ Bravyi \ and\ author A. Y. \ Kitaev ,\ 10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 journal journal Ann. Phys. \ volume 298 ,\ pages 210 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

2002
[88]

Durand ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 28 ,\ pages 3184 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

author author P. Durand ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 28 ,\ pages 3184 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

1983
[89]

Kaldor ,\ @noop journal journal Theoretica chimica acta \ volume 80 ,\ pages 427 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

author author U. Kaldor ,\ @noop journal journal Theoretica chimica acta \ volume 80 ,\ pages 427 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

1991
[90]

Jeziorski \ and\ author H

author author B. Jeziorski \ and\ author H. J. \ Monkhorst ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.24.1668 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1668 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

1981 doi
[91]

Jeziorski \ and\ author J

author author B. Jeziorski \ and\ author J. Paldus ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 2714 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

1989
[92]

author author D. E. \ Bernholdt \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Advances in Quantum Chemistry ,\ Vol. volume 34 \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 1999 )\ pp.\ pages 271--293 NoStop

1999
[93]

Pal , author M

author author S. Pal , author M. Rittby , author R. J. \ Bartlett , author D. Sinha , \ and\ author D. Mukherjee ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 88 ,\ pages 4357 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988
[94]

Meissner \ and\ author M

author author L. Meissner \ and\ author M. Nooijen ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 102 ,\ pages 9604 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

1995
[95]

Meissner ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 108 ,\ pages 9227 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

author author L. Meissner ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 108 ,\ pages 9227 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

1998
[96]

Li \ and\ author J

author author X. Li \ and\ author J. Paldus ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 119 ,\ pages 5320 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

2003
[97]

author author D. I. \ Lyakh , author M. Musia , author V. F. \ Lotrich , \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 182 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012
[98]

Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal J

author author K. Kowalski ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 158 ,\ pages 054101 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[99]

Oliphant \ and\ author L

author author N. Oliphant \ and\ author L. Adamowicz ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 94 ,\ pages 1229 ( year 1991 b ) NoStop

1991
[100]

Oliphant \ and\ author L

author author N. Oliphant \ and\ author L. Adamowicz ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 96 ,\ pages 3739 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

1992
[101]

Piecuch , author N

author author P. Piecuch , author N. Oliphant , \ and\ author L. Adamowicz ,\ 10.1063/1.466179 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 1875 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

1993 doi
[102]

Metcalf , author N

author author M. Metcalf , author N. P. \ Bauman , author K. Kowalski , \ and\ author W. A. \ de Jong ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 16 ,\ pages 6165 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[103]

Nicholas P , author J

author author B. Nicholas P , author J. Chládek , author L. Veis , author J. Pittner , \ and\ author K. Karol ,\ 10.1088/2058-9565/abf602 journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 6 ,\ pages 034008 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[104]

author author E. J. \ Bylaska , author A. Panyala , author N. P. \ Bauman , author B. Peng , author H. Pathak , author D. Mejia-Rodriguez , author N. Govind , author D. B. \ Williams-Young , author E. Apr \`a , author A. Bagusetty , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal ...

2024
[105]

Mutlu , author A

author author E. Mutlu , author A. Panyala , author N. Gawande , author A. Bagusetty , author J. Glabe , author J. Kim , author K. Kowalski , author N. P. \ Bauman , author B. Peng , author H. Pathak , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 15...

2023
[106]

author author G. H. \ Low , author N. P. \ Bauman , author C. E. \ Granade , author B. Peng , author N. Wiebe , author E. J. \ Bylaska , author D. Wecker , author S. Krishnamoorthy , author M. Roetteler , author K. Kowalski , author M. Troyer , \ and\ author N. A. \ Baker ,\ h...

1904 arXiv
[107]

Li , author O

author author A. Li , author O. Subasi , author X. Yang , \ and\ author S. Krishnamoorthy ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Sc20: international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis \ ( organization IEEE ,\ year 2020 )\ pp.\ pages 1--15 NoStop

2020
[108]

\ Suh \ and\ author A

author author I.-S. \ Suh \ and\ author A. Li ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06861 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 arXiv
[109]

Li , author C

author author A. Li , author C. Liu , author S. Stein , author I.-S. \ Suh , author M. Zheng , author M. Wang , author Y. Shi , author B. Fang , author M. Roetteler , \ and\ author T. Humble ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13184 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 arXiv
[110]

Pal ,\ @noop journal journal Theor

author author S. Pal ,\ @noop journal journal Theor. Chim. Acta \ volume 66 ,\ pages 207 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

1984
[111]

Kutzelnigg ,\ @noop journal journal Theor

author author W. Kutzelnigg ,\ @noop journal journal Theor. Chim. Acta \ volume 80 ,\ pages 349 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

1991
[112]

author author A. G. \ Taube \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ @noop journal journal Int. J. Quantum Chem. \ volume 106 ,\ pages 3393 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006
[113]

Sur , author R

author author C. Sur , author R. K. \ Chaudhuri , author B. K. \ Sahoo , author B. Das , \ and\ author D. Mukherjee ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. B \ volume 41 ,\ pages 065001 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

2008
[114]

Cooper \ and\ author P

author author B. Cooper \ and\ author P. J. \ Knowles ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 234102 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010
[115]

author author F. A. \ Evangelista , author G. K.-L. \ Chan , \ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 151 ,\ pages 244112 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019
[116]

Anand , author P

author author A. Anand , author P. Schleich , author S. Alperin-Lea , author P. W. \ Jensen , author S. Sim , author M. D \' az-Tinoco , author J. S. \ Kottmann , author M. Degroote , author A. F. \ Izmaylov , \ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical Soc...

2022
[117]

Nooijen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2108 journal journal Phys

author author M. Nooijen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2108 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 2108 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

doi
[118]

Nakatsuji ,\ 10.1063/1.1287275 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 113 ,\ pages 2949 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

author author H. Nakatsuji ,\ 10.1063/1.1287275 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 113 ,\ pages 2949 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

doi
[119]

Van Voorhis \ and\ author M

author author T. Van Voorhis \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ 10.1063/1.1390516 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 115 ,\ pages 5033 ( year 2001 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/115/11/5033/19163770/5033\_1\_online.pdf htt...

2001 doi
[120]

Piecuch , author K

author author P. Piecuch , author K. Kowalski , author P.-D. \ Fan , \ and\ author K. Jedziniak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.113001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 113001 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

2003 doi
[121]

Ronen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.123002 journal journal Phys

author author S. Ronen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.123002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 123002 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

2003 doi
[122]

Mukherjee \ and\ author W

author author D. Mukherjee \ and\ author W. Kutzelnigg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.100 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 397 ,\ pages 174 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

2004 doi
[123]

Greene-Diniz \ and\ author D

author author G. Greene-Diniz \ and\ author D. Muñoz Ramo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26352 journal journal International Journal of Quantum Chemistry \ volume 121 ,\ pages e26352 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[124]

author author H. R. \ Grimsley , author S. E. \ Economou , author E. Barnes , \ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 journal journal Nature communications \ volume 10 ,\ pages 3007 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi
[125]

author author H. L. \ Tang , author V. Shkolnikov , author G. S. \ Barron , author H. R. \ Grimsley , author N. J. \ Mayhall , author E. Barnes , \ and\ author S. E. \ Economou ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020310 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 020310 ( year 2021 a ) NoStop

doi
[126]

Temme , author S

author author K. Temme , author S. Bravyi , \ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 180509 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi
[127]

author author O. G. \ Maupin , author A. D. \ Burch , author B. Ruzic , author C. G. \ Yale , author A. Russo , author D. S. \ Lobser , author M. C. \ Revelle , author M. N. \ Chow , author S. M. \ Clark , author A. J. \ Landahl , \ and\ author P. J. \ Love ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA...

doi
[128]

@noop title Qesem: A qiskit function by qedma , \ howpublished https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/qedma-qesem ( year 2025 ),\ note accessed: 2025-05-28 NoStop

2025
[129]

Singh , author L

author author H. Singh , author L. W. \ Bertels , author D. Claudino , author S. E. \ Economou , author E. Barnes , author N. P. \ Bauman , author K. Kowalski , \ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18683 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 arXiv
[130]

Zhao , author J

author author L. Zhao , author J. J. \ Goings , author W. Aboumrad , author A. Arrasmith , author L. Calderin , author S. Churchill , author D. Gabay , author T. Harvey-Brown , author M. Hiles , author M. Kaja , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22408 \...

2025 arXiv
[131]

author author P. K. \ Barkoutsos , author J. F. \ Gonthier , author I. Sokolov , author N. Moll , author G. Salis , author A. Fuhrer , author M. Ganzhorn , author D. J. \ Egger , author M. Troyer , author A. Mezzacapo , author S. Filipp , \ and\ author I. Tavernelli ,\ 10.1103...

doi
[132]

author author Y. S. \ Yordanov , author D. R. M. \ Arvidsson-Shukur , \ and\ author C. H. W. \ Barnes ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.062612 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 102 ,\ pages 062612 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[133]

author author H. L. \ Tang , author V. Shkolnikov , author G. S. \ Barron , author H. R. \ Grimsley , author N. J. \ Mayhall , author E. Barnes , \ and\ author S. E. \ Economou ,\ @noop journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 020310 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

2021
[134]

@noop title Performance validation , \ howpublished https://docs.quantinuum.com/systems/user_guide/hardware_user_guide/performance_validation.html ( year 2025 ),\ note accessed: 2025-06-16 NoStop

2025
[135]

@noop title Ibm quantum platform , \ howpublished https://quantum.ibm.com/services/resources ( year 2025 ),\ note accessed: 2025-06-16 NoStop

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Coester ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 journal journal Nucl

author author F. Coester ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 journal journal Nucl. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 421 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

doi:10.1016/0029-5582(58)90280-3 1958

[2] [2]

C \' z ek ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1727484 journal journal J

author author J. C \' z ek ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1727484 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 4256 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.1727484 1966

[3] [3]

Raghavachari , author G

author author K. Raghavachari , author G. W. \ Trucks , author J. A. \ Pople , \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(89)87395-6 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 157 ,\ pages 479 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6

[4] [4]

author author R. J. \ Bartlett \ and\ author M. Musia ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 291 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 2007

[5] [5]

Lee , author W

author author C. Lee , author W. Yang , \ and\ author R. G. \ Parr ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review B \ volume 37 ,\ pages 785 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988

[6] [6]

author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke , \ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

1996

[7] [7]

author author R. O. \ Jones ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of modern physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 897 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015

[8] [8]

Knizia \ and\ author G

author author G. Knizia \ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 109 ,\ pages 186404 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012