Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Type-1.5 SNSPD: Interacting vortex theory of two bandgap superconducting single photon detectors

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single photon can seed a two-vortex cluster in a type-1.5 SNSPD and that this regime suppresses dark counts relative to type-2 devices.

desk verdict Novel two-vortex nucleation result is real, but the dark-count suppression claim is not actually tied to type-1.5 physics. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01240 v1 pith:CC7WPGJF submitted 2025-07-01 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.ins-det

Leif Bauer , Daien He , Sathwik Bharadwaj , Shunshun Liu , Prasanna V. Balachandran , Zubin Jacob This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hallphysics.ins-det
keywords type-1.5superconductivityMgB2SNSPDvortexcrossingdarkcountsuppressiontwo-bandGinzburg-Landautime-dependentsingle-photondetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that nanowire single-photon detectors made from two-band superconductors such as MgB2 can operate in the type-1.5 regime, where vortex-vortex forces are attractive at long range and repulsive at short range. The central claim is that a single photon absorbed near the nanowire edge can nucleate a two-vortex cluster that crosses the wire and switches the device, instead of the single vortex that type-2 materials produce. The paper also claims that this type-1.5 regime suppresses dark counts relative to type-2 detectors at the same bias, because the vortex crossing barrier stays higher as the current approaches the critical current. If correct, the result points toward single-photon detectors that run at higher temperatures, such as the 20 K operation already demonstrated for MgB2, and that see longer wavelengths without the dark-count penalty that currently limits sensitivity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-component time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) model with two order parameters, $\psi_\sigma$ for the $\sigma$ band and $\psi_\pi$ for the pi band, coupled by a Josephson-type interband term with phase difference $0$ or $\pi$. Observables are built from the combined order parameter $|\psi| = \sqrt{|\psi_\sigma|^2 + |\psi_\pi|^2}$. To compute the vortex crossing barrier $U_{\max}$, the paper uses the string method to find saddle-point configurations and evaluates $U_{\max} = F_{\mathrm{saddle}} - F_{\mathrm{ground}} - (\hbar/2e)(I/I_c)\Delta\varphi$. The vortex energy is modified into a two-component form $\varepsilon'_0 = (\Phi_0^2 d)/(4\pi \mu_0 \lambda_{\mathrm{eff}}^2(a))(1 + \gamma \eta)$, where the effective penetration depth is set by an interband scattering probability $a(T_c)$ and $\gamma$ is a fitted constant; this carries the type-1.5 physics into the dark-count rate.

What would settle it

A clean MgB2 nanowire with $T_c$ near 38.6 K, biased below $T_c/2$, should show a dark-count rate versus bias current whose extracted barrier matches the two-band TDGL prediction and not the single-band London barrier; it should also show a two-vortex crossing channel from single-photon hotspots. If imaging or current-response measurements show only single-vortex crossings, or if the measured dark-count suppression relative to a type-2 MgB2 film of similar $T_c$ is absent, the central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery claim is that the two-component nature of MgB2 changes the single-photon detection event itself. In a two-band Ginzburg-Landau description, the $\sigma$ band is type-2 and the pi band is type-1, so the combined order parameter supports vortex clusters rather than an Abrikosov lattice. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations with a diffusive hotspot show that one absorbed photon can nucleate a two-vortex cluster that crosses the nanowire, and that at bias currents above about 40 percent of the critical current the energy barrier for a two-vortex crossing becomes nearly equal to the single-vortex barrier. The dark-count rate, taken as $D = \alpha e^{-U_{\max}/k_B T}$, is then much more sharply suppressed with decreasing bias in the type-1.5 case than in type-2 MgB2 or type-2 NbN, yielding suppression factors of several orders of magnitude at high bias. The paper presents an expression for the two-component vortex energy combining London theory with the interband Josephson coupling and an interband scattering probability, and shows that the predicted barriers match vortex barriers extracted from existing MgB2 dark-count measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions depend on the two-component Ginzburg-Landau model being valid for MgB2 at temperatures below about half its critical temperature; if the bands stop behaving as two coupled condensates there, the vortex-cluster nucleation and dark-count suppression would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Clean MgB2 SNSPDs should exhibit a two-vortex crossing signature in response to single photons, observable as a distinct bias-dependent onset in detection efficiency.
  • At high bias currents the dark-count rate in type-1.5 MgB2 should be orders of magnitude below that of type-2 MgB2 with the same critical temperature, improving the minimum detectable power.
  • Because the two-vortex and single-vortex barriers converge for $I/I_c > 0.4$, two-vortex events should contribute to both photon counts and dark counts in the operating regime.
  • Operation at elevated temperatures such as 20 K becomes more favorable, since the dark-count penalty that usually forces low-temperature biasing is reduced.
  • The general two-component model transfers the prediction to other type-1.5 superconductors and to dirty two-band systems, not only clean MgB2.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If single-photon hotspots nucleate vortex pairs, then photon-number information may be encoded in the multiplicity of vortex crossings; a two-photon absorption could plausibly seed a three- or four-vortex cluster, giving a route to photon-number-resolving detection that the paper does not discuss.
  • The sharp current dependence of the suppression factor suggests the optimal operating point for a type-1.5 SNSPD sits closer to the critical current than for type-2 devices, a testable prediction about bias optimization.
  • The linear interpolation used for the interband scattering probability $a(T_c)$ is a crude model; refined measurements of $a$ across $T_c$ values could shift the quantitative suppression predictions while preserving the qualitative advantage.
  • Existing MgB2 nanowire devices with measured dark-count barriers, as compiled in the paper's Table I, can serve as an immediate test bed: comparing calculated and experimental barriers across cleaner and dirtier samples would isolate the type-1.5 contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a theory for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) based on two-band superconductors in the type-1.5 regime, using MgB2 as the central example. It combines DFT calculations of band structure and electron-phonon coupling with two-band time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) simulations to show that a photon-induced hotspot can nucleate two-vortex clusters in type-1.5 superconductors, and that such clusters can cross the nanowire. The paper then constructs a London-type vortex barrier model with a modified vortex energy (Eq. 6) to compute dark count rates and a 'suppression factor' (Eq. 9), and claims that type-1.5 MgB2 exhibits significantly suppressed dark counts compared to type-2 MgB2. The model is compared against dark-count-derived barriers for three MgB2 devices in Table I. The paper's principal claims are (i) the two-vortex nucleation mechanism and (ii) the dark-count suppression benefit of the type-1.5 regime.

Significance. If the dark-count suppression claim were shown to be a genuine consequence of type-1.5 vortex interactions, the paper would open a promising direction for high-temperature SNSPDs. The work has notable strengths: it uses ab initio DFT inputs for the band gaps and couplings, combines TDGL simulations with string-method barrier calculations, and provides a concrete three-device comparison in Table I. The two-vortex nucleation from a hotspot is a novel and interesting prediction that could stimulate experimental work. The proposed suppression factor is a useful metric, and the data availability statement allows access to the underlying data. However, the central quantitative claim of type-1.5-specific dark-count suppression is not actually tied to the vortex-interaction regime, because the paper's own single-band limit (η=0, a=1) reproduces the suppression. The quantitative support is also weakened by a fitting parameter and by a 57% deviation for the cleanest device. These issues need to be addressed before the result can be assessed as a robust contribution to SNSPD physics.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (6)–(9), Fig. 3d] The central claim that dark counts are suppressed 'in the type-1.5 regime' is contradicted by the paper's own single-band limit. The text states that 'This suppression remains even if we consider the single band case for vortex energy (i.e. η = 0, a = 1)', and Fig. 3d shows the dashed single-band curves following the same suppression behavior. Since the suppression persists with no interband Josephson coupling (η=0) and no two-component vortex physics (a=1), it cannot be attributed to type-1.5 long-range attraction and short-range repulsion. The subsequent conclusion that 'the dark count suppression appears to be caused by differences in the behavior of type-1.5 and type-2 SNSPDs' is therefore internally inconsistent. The dominant factor, as the paper's own Fig. 4a shows, is the normal-state resistivity (and hence the magnetic penetration depth), not the vortex-interaction regime. This undermines the abstract's claim of a type-1.5-specific dark-count advantage.
  2. [Eq. (6), Table I] The vortex-energy expression in Eq. (6) contains a fitting parameter γ = −1.2275 that is fitted to TDGL simulations of the same two-band vortex physics. The predicted dark-count suppression and the suppression factor therefore partly reduce to a fitted value rather than to an independent, parameter-free theory. The experimental comparison in Table I is partial: for the clean MgB2 device (Tc = 37.6 K), the model overestimates Umax by about 57% (114.9 meV vs. 73.19 meV), while for the two lower-Tc devices the agreement is closer. Without error bars on the experimental extractions and with only three devices spanning a wide parameter range, the validation is not sufficient to support a quantitative 'matches closely' claim. The paper should provide a sensitivity analysis for γ and a, and ideally an independent determination of γ from microscopic theory or a different observable.
  3. [§2, assumption of two-component GL applicability] The paper explicitly assumes 'that a two component Ginzburg-Landau model is applicable in MgB2 at temperatures below 0.5Tc.' This assumption is load-bearing because the TDGL simulations and the derived vortex barriers depend on it. The text cites literature on both sides of the type-1.5 debate, but it does not justify the assumption for the specific device parameters used (thin nanowires, potentially disordered films). If this assumption fails, the two-vortex nucleation and the vortex barrier calculations would need to be redone with a microscopic model. This limitation should be stated more prominently, and the paper should provide additional support, such as a comparison of TDGL predictions with a microscopic calculation for the relevant parameter range.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] The paper describes the model as 'ab-initio theory,' but Eq. (6) contains a fitting parameter γ fitted to TDGL simulations. The phrase is misleading; consider rephrasing to 'DFT-informed TDGL simulation and vortex barrier model.'
  2. [Eq. (7)] The piecewise function for the interband scattering probability a should specify that Tc is in kelvin and should provide the justification for the linear fit, since it is a central material parameter in the suppression calculation.
  3. [Fig. 3d] The legend labels '1-Band' and '2-Band' are unclear. Clarify that '1-Band' refers to setting η=0 and a=1 in Eq. (6), not to an actual single-band superconductor calculation.
  4. [Author contributions] The author contributions list 'H.X.T.' as a contributor, but this name does not appear in the author list. Please correct the attribution.
  5. [Affiliation/typography] The affiliation contains a typo: 'West Lafayette, 47907, IN, USA' appears as 'V A' in the line 'West Lafayette, V A, USA'. Also, the symbol 'σ → π' in the text appears with an arrow that may be a formatting artifact.
  6. [Table I] The extraction of Umax,e from dark count rate experiments is not described in the main text. Explicitly referencing the supplementary material section and the procedure would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Dark-count suppression 'prediction' reduces to a fitted vortex energy and is shown by the paper itself to persist in the single-band limit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Eq. 6, used with Eqs. 1-2 to produce Fig. 3c,d]
    "ϵ′0 = Φ²0d/(4πµ0λ²(a)) (1 + γη) (6) ... γ = −1.2275 is a fitting parameter which can be positive or negative. The expression in Eq. 6 comes from changes to the vortex energy versus η found using TDGL."

    The dark-count suppression (Eq. 9, Fig. 3c,d) is computed by inserting this ϵ′0 into the London-barrier expression Eq. 2 and then Eq. 1. Since γ was fit to reproduce TDGL vortex-energy changes, the 'prediction' of the vortex-crossing barrier and hence the dark-count rate is a refit of the same TDGL input, not an independent derivation. The suppression is therefore partly a fitted consequence of Eq. 6 rather than a first-principles result.

  2. other [Fig. 3d and following paragraph]
    "This suppression remains even if we consider the single band case for vortex energy (i.e. η = 0, a= 1). ... Instead, the dark count suppression appears to be caused by differences in the behavior of type-1.5 and type-2 SNSPDs."

    The paper's own single-band limit (η = 0, a = 1) removes the interband Josephson coupling and two-component vortex interaction that define type-1.5 behavior, yet the suppression persists (dashed lines in Fig. 3d). The calculation therefore does not establish that type-1.5 physics produces the suppression; the same effect follows from the input material parameters (ρn and λ_eff) in the single-band version of Eqs. 6-8. Attributing the suppression to type-1.5 differences is thus an unsupported step in the derivation chain, not a consequence of the two-band model.

full rationale

The two-vortex nucleation result from TDGL is an independent simulation finding, and the comparison with measured Umax values in Table I provides a useful external anchor. However, the central advertised dark-count benefit is built on Eq. 6, whose parameter γ is fitted to the same TDGL vortex-energy data that the subsequent 'prediction' is supposed to reproduce. Moreover, the paper explicitly states that the suppression remains in the single-band limit η = 0, a = 1, which removes the type-1.5 interaction mechanism; the suppression is then controlled by input material parameters such as ρn and λ_eff. The claim that dark counts are suppressed 'in the type-1.5 regime' is therefore not a derived consequence of two-component vortex physics but a fitted plus material-parameter comparison, giving partial circularity rather than a fully independent prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's quantitative predictions depend on two fitted parameters (gamma and a(Tc) coefficients) and several domain assumptions, the most fragile being the validity of two-band GL theory in MgB2 at the temperatures of interest.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma (interband coupling correction) = -1.2275
    Fitting parameter in the two-component vortex energy expression Eq. 6, obtained from TDGL simulations; it controls the multiband correction and directly affects the dark-count suppression prediction.
  • a(Tc) linear coefficients = 1.3586 and -0.0326
    Coefficients in Eq. 7 for the interband scattering probability a(Tc), fitted to experimental trends of bandgap merging; used to compute lambda_eff and vortex energy.
  • c (added constant in Fig 2b) = 0.6
    Arbitrary constant added to TDGL Umax to match the London model in Fig. 2b; not a physical parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Two-component Ginzburg-Landau model is applicable to MgB2 below 0.5Tc
    Stated in the text: 'we will assume in the following discussions that a two component Ginzburg-Landau model is applicable in MgB2 at temperatures below 0.5Tc.' This is an active research debate; the paper relies on cited microscopic studies.
  • domain assumption Dark count rate obeys D = alpha * exp(-Umax/kBT)
    Equation 1, standard vortex-crossing model for SNSPDs, cited from Engel et al. and Jahani et al.
  • domain assumption Hotspot in TDGL corresponds to single-photon absorption
    The paper uses a 'diffusive hotspot' to nucleate vortices and identifies it with single-photon detection, but does not quantify the photon energy or hotspot size mapping.
  • standard math String method yields saddle-point free energy for vortex crossing
    Standard method for rare events, referenced to E et al.; used to compute Umax.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Type-1.5 SNSPD: Interacting vortex theory of two bandgap superconducting single photon detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CC7WPGJF

@misc{pith2026250701240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Type-1.5 SNSPD: Interacting vortex theory of two bandgap superconducting single photon detectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CC7WPGJF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01240}
}
read the original abstract

Photon detectors based on type-2 superconductors have found widespread applications from on-chip quantum computing to quantum remote sensing. Here, we develop the theory for a new class of type-1.5 superconducting nanowire single photon detectors (SNSPDs) based on two bandgap superconductors with high transition temperatures such as MgB2 (Tc ~38.6K). We show that vortex-vortex interactions in two component condensates lead to a unique operating regime where single photons can seed multiple vortices within a hotspot. We also show that dark counts are suppressed in the type-1.5 regime compared to the widely studied type-2 SNSPDs. Our work opens the door for exploring the unique vortex physics of two-gap superconductors for quantum device applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison of type-2 (NbN) and type-1.5 (MgB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of type-2 and type-1.5 SNSPD behavior. (a) Schematic and TDGL simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dark count suppression in type-1.5 SNSPDs. (a) Comparison of type-2 and type-1.5 order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Suppression factor dependence on material and multiband parameters. (a) Dependence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multiple correlation lengths and type-1.5 superconductivity in $U(1)$ superconductors due to hidden competition between irreducible representations of nonlocal pairing

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A nominally single-component superconductor can exhibit type-1.5 vortex clustering because a suppressed competing pairing channel generates a second coherence length.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alexander , author A

    author author K. Alexander , author A. Benyamini , author D. Black , author D. Bonneau , author S. Burgos , author B. Burridge , author H. Cable , author G. Campbell , author G. Catalano , author A. Ceballos , author C.-M. \ Chang , author S. S. \ Choudhury , author C. J. \ Chung , author F. Danesh , author T. Dauer , author M. Davis , author E. Dudley , ...

  2. [2]

    Wang , author J

    author author H. Wang , author J. Qin , author X. Ding , author M.-C. \ Chen , author S. Chen , author X. You , author Y.-M. \ He , author X. Jiang , author L. You , author Z. Wang , author C. Schneider , author J. J. \ Renema , author S. Höfling , author C.-Y. \ Lu ,\ and\ author J.-W. \ Pan ,\ title title Boson Sampling with 20 Input Photons and a 60- M...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.250503

  3. [3]

    Kaur , author D

    author author T. Kaur , author D. Peace ,\ and\ author J. Romero ,\ title title On-chip high-dimensional entangled photon sources , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ada0c5 journal journal J. Opt. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 023001 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/2040-8986/ada0c5

  4. [4]

    Bao , author L

    author author F. Bao , author L. Bauer , author A. Rubio Lopez , author Z. Yang , author X. Wang ,\ and\ author Z. Jacob ,\ title title Photon discerner: Adaptive quantum optical sensing near the shot noise limit , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad6584 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 26 ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ad6584 NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad6584

  5. [5]

    author author P. S. \ Blakey , author H. Liu , author G. Papangelakis , author Y. Zhang , author Z. M. \ Léger , author M. L. \ Iu ,\ and\ author A. S. \ Helmy ,\ title title Quantum and non-local effects offer over 40 dB noise resilience advantage towards quantum lidar , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33376-9 journal journal Nat Commun \ volume 13 ...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33376-9

  6. [6]

    Cheng , author C.-L

    author author R. Cheng , author C.-L. \ Zou , author X. Guo , author S. Wang , author X. Han ,\ and\ author H. X. \ Tang ,\ title title Broadband on-chip single-photon spectrometer , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12149-x journal journal Nat Commun \ volume 10 ,\ pages 4104 ( year 2019 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12149-x

  7. [7]

    author author D. V. \ Reddy , author R. R. \ Nerem , author S. W. \ Nam , author R. P. \ Mirin ,\ and\ author V. B. \ Verma ,\ title title Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98\

  8. [8]

    Korzh , author Q.-Y

    author author B. Korzh , author Q.-Y. \ Zhao , author J. P. \ Allmaras , author S. Frasca , author T. M. \ Autry , author E. A. \ Bersin , author A. D. \ Beyer , author R. M. \ Briggs , author B. Bumble , author M. Colangelo , author G. M. \ Crouch , author A. E. \ Dane , author T. Gerrits , author A. E. \ Lita , author F. Marsili , author G. Moody , auth...

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    author author V. B. \ Verma , author B. Korzh , author A. B. \ Walter , author A. E. \ Lita , author R. M. \ Briggs , author M. Colangelo , author Y. Zhai , author E. E. \ Wollman , author A. D. \ Beyer , author J. P. \ Allmaras , author H. Vora , author D. Zhu , author E. Sch...

  2. [10]

    Marsili , author F

    author author F. Marsili , author F. Bellei , author F. Najafi , author A. E. \ Dane , author E. A. \ Dauler , author R. J. \ Molnar ,\ and\ author K. K. \ Berggren ,\ title title Efficient Single Photon Detection from 500 nm to 5 um Wavelength , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/nl30...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author C. M. \ Natarajan , author M. G. \ Tanner ,\ and\ author R. H. \ Hadfield ,\ title title Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001 journal journal Supercond. Sci. Technol. \ volume...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author A. G. \ Kozorezov , author A. F. \ Volkov , author J. K. \ Wigmore , author A. Peacock , author A. Poelaert ,\ and\ author R. den Hartog ,\ title title Quasiparticle-phonon downconversion in nonequilibrium superconductors , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Engel , author J

    author author A. Engel , author J. Lonsky , author X. Zhang ,\ and\ author A. Schilling ,\ title title Detection Mechanism in SNSPD : Numerical Results of a Conceptually Simple , Yet Powerful Detection Model , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2014.2371537 journal journal IEEE Tr...

  6. [14]

    Jahani , author L.-P

    author author S. Jahani , author L.-P. \ Yang , author A. Buganza Tepole , author J. C. \ Bardin , author H. X. \ Tang ,\ and\ author Z. Jacob ,\ title title Probabilistic vortex crossing criterion for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors , \ https://doi.org/10.106...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Embon , author Y

    author author L. Embon , author Y. Anahory , author Z. Jelic , author E. O. \ Lachman , author Y. Myasoedov , author M. E. \ Huber , author G. P. \ Mikitik , author A. V. \ Silhanek , author M. V. \ Milošević , author A. Gurevich ,\ and\ author E. Zeldov ,\ title title Imaging...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author M. K. \ Akhlaghi , author H. Atikian , author A. Eftekharian , author M. Loncar ,\ and\ author A. H. \ Majedi ,\ title title Reduced dark counts in optimized geometries for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.023610 ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Esmaeil Zadeh , author J

    author author I. Esmaeil Zadeh , author J. W. N. \ Los , author R. B. M. \ Gourgues , author V. Steinmetz , author G. Bulgarini , author S. M. \ Dobrovolskiy , author V. Zwiller ,\ and\ author S. N. \ Dorenbos ,\ title title Single-photon detectors combining high efficiency, h...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author L. N. \ Bulaevskii , author M. J. \ Graf , author C. D. \ Batista ,\ and\ author V. G. \ Kogan ,\ title title Vortex-induced dissipation in narrow current-biased thin-film superconducting strips , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.144526 journal journal Phys....

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author R. H. \ Hadfield ,\ title title Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 journal journal Nature Photon \ volume 3 ,\ pages 696--705 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    Moshchalkov , author M

    author author V. Moshchalkov , author M. Menghini , author T. Nishio , author Q. H. \ Chen , author A. V. \ Silhanek , author V. H. \ Dao , author L. F. \ Chibotaru , author N. D. \ Zhigadlo ,\ and\ author J. Karpinski ,\ title title Type-1.5 Superconductivity , \ https://doi....

    doi

  13. [21]

    Tarantini , author H

    author author C. Tarantini , author H. U. \ Aebersold , author V. Braccini , author G. Celentano , author C. Ferdeghini , author V. Ferrando , author U. Gambardella , author F. Gatti , author E. Lehmann , author P. Manfrinetti , author D. Marré , author A. Palenzona , author I...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Cherednichenko , author N

    author author S. Cherednichenko , author N. Acharya , author E. Novoselov ,\ and\ author V. Drakinskiy ,\ title title Low kinetic inductance superconducting MgB _ 2 nanowires with a 130 ps relaxation time for single-photon detection applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/136...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Charaev , author E

    author author I. Charaev , author E. K. \ Batson , author S. Cherednichenko , author K. Reidy , author V. Drakinskiy , author Y. Yu , author S. Lara-Avila , author J. D. \ Thomsen , author M. Colangelo , author F. Incalza , author K. Ilin , author A. Schilling ,\ and\ author K...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Tinkham ,\ @noop title Introduction to superconductivity ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.,\ Dover books on physics\ ( publisher Dover Publ ,\ address Mineola, NY ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    author author M. Tinkham ,\ @noop title Introduction to superconductivity ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.,\ Dover books on physics\ ( publisher Dover Publ ,\ address Mineola, NY ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  17. [25]

    author author W. A. \ Little \ and\ author R. D. \ Parks ,\ title title Observation of Quantum Periodicity in the Transition Temperature of a Superconducting Cylinder , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.9 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 9--12 ( year ...

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author L. Kramer ,\ title title Thermodynamic Behavior of Type - II Superconductors with Small k near the Lower Critical Field , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.3.3821 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 3 ,\ pages 3821--3825 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author V. G. \ Kogan \ and\ author J. Schmalian ,\ title title Ginzburg- Landau theory of two-band superconductors: Absence of type-1.5 superconductivity , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.054515 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ pages 054515 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [28]

    Babaev \ and\ author M

    author author E. Babaev \ and\ author M. Silaev ,\ title title Comment on `` Ginzburg - Landau theory of two-band superconductors: Absence of type-1.5 superconductivity'' , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.016501 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 016501 ( ...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Silaev \ and\ author E

    author author M. Silaev \ and\ author E. Babaev ,\ title title Microscopic derivation of two-component Ginzburg - Landau model and conditions of its applicability in two-band systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134514 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pag...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Silaev \ and\ author E

    author author M. Silaev \ and\ author E. Babaev ,\ title title Microscopic theory of type-1.5 superconductivity in multiband systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094515 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 094515 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Timoshuk \ and\ author E

    author author I. Timoshuk \ and\ author E. Babaev ,\ title title Microscopic solutions for vortex clustering in two-band type-1.5 superconductors , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064509 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 110 ,\ pages 064509 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  24. [32]

    Garaud , author A

    author author J. Garaud , author A. Corticelli , author M. Silaev ,\ and\ author E. Babaev ,\ title title Properties of dirty two-band superconductors with repulsive interband interaction: Normal modes, length scales, vortices, and magnetic response , \ https://doi.org/10.1103...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Gutierrez , author B

    author author J. Gutierrez , author B. Raes , author A. V. \ Silhanek , author L. J. \ Li , author N. D. \ Zhigadlo , author J. Karpinski , author J. Tempere ,\ and\ author V. V. \ Moshchalkov ,\ title title Scanning Hall probe microscopy of unconventional vortex patterns in t...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Nishio , author V

    author author T. Nishio , author V. H. \ Dao , author Q. Chen , author L. F. \ Chibotaru , author K. Kadowaki ,\ and\ author V. V. \ Moshchalkov ,\ title title Scanning SQUID microscopy of vortex clusters in multiband superconductors , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.020...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author P. G. \ Björnsson , author Y. Maeno , author M. E. \ Huber ,\ and\ author K. A. \ Moler ,\ title title Scanning magnetic imaging of Sr 2 Ru O 4 , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.012504 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 012504 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    Geurts , author M

    author author R. Geurts , author M. V. \ Milošević ,\ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Vortex matter in mesoscopic two-gap superconducting disks: Influence of Josephson and magnetic coupling , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214514 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author H. J. \ Choi , author D. Roundy , author H. Sun , author M. L. \ Cohen ,\ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ title title The origin of the anomalous superconducting properties of MgB2 , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00898 journal journal Nature \ volume 418 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author T. S. \ Alstrøm , author M. P. \ Sørensen , author N. F. \ Pedersen ,\ and\ author S. Madsen ,\ title title Magnetic Flux Lines in Complex Geometry Type - II Superconductors Studied by the Time Dependent Ginzburg - Landau Equation , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s104...

    doi

  31. [39]

    \ Chan ,\ title ANALYSIS AND APPROXIMATION OF A TWO-BAND GINZBURG-LANDAU MODEL OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY ,\ @noop Ph.D

    author author W.-K. \ Chan ,\ title ANALYSIS AND APPROXIMATION OF A TWO-BAND GINZBURG-LANDAU MODEL OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school Florida State University ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  32. [40]

    author author V. G. \ Kogan ,\ title title Interaction of vortices in thin superconducting films and the Berezinskii - Kosterlitz - Thouless transition , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.064514 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 75 ,\ pages 064514 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  33. [41]

    E , author W

    author author W. E , author W. Ren ,\ and\ author E. Vanden-Eijnden ,\ title title String method for the study of rare events , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.052301 journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 66 ,\ pages 052301 ( y...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author D. Y. \ Vodolazov ,\ title title Saddle point states in two-dimensional superconducting films biased near the depairing current , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174507 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 174507 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    Qiu \ and\ author T

    author author C. Qiu \ and\ author T. Qian ,\ title title Numerical study of the phase slip in two-dimensional superconducting strips , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174517 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 174517 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author A. N. \ Zotova \ and\ author D. Y. \ Vodolazov ,\ title title Photon detection by current-carrying superconducting film: A time-dependent Ginzburg - Landau approach , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.024509 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 0...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author P. J. \ Curran , author W. M. \ Desoky , author M. V. \ Milosevic , author A. Chaves , author J.-B. \ Laloe , author J. S. \ Moodera ,\ and\ author S. J. \ Bending ,\ title title Spontaneous symmetry breaking in vortex systems with two repulsive lengthscales , \ ...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Putti , author P

    author author M. Putti , author P. Brotto , author M. Monni , author E. G. \ d'Agliano , author A. Sanna ,\ and\ author S. Massidda ,\ title title Intraband vs. interband scattering rate effects in neutron irradiated MgB _ 2 , \ https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/77/57005 journ...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Putti , author M

    author author M. Putti , author M. Affronte , author C. Ferdeghini , author P. Manfrinetti , author C. Tarantini ,\ and\ author E. Lehmann ,\ title title Observation of the Crossover from Two - Gap to Single - Gap Superconductivity through Specific Heat Measurements in Neutron...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Di Capua , author H

    author author R. Di Capua , author H. U. \ Aebersold , author C. Ferdeghini , author V. Ferrando , author P. Orgiani , author M. Putti , author M. Salluzzo , author R. Vaglio ,\ and\ author X. X. \ Xi ,\ title title Role of interband scattering in neutron irradiated Mg B 2 thi...

    doi

  41. [49]

    \ Kim , author J

    author author M.-S. \ Kim , author J. A. \ Skinta , author T. R. \ Lemberger , author W. N. \ Kang , author H.-J. \ Kim , author E.-M. \ Choi ,\ and\ author S.-I. \ Lee ,\ title title Reflection of a two-gap nature in penetration-depth measurements of MgB 2 film , \ https://do...

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author A. E. \ Velasco , author D. P. \ Cunnane , author N. Acharya , author R. Briggs , author A. Beyer , author M. Shaw , author B. S. \ Karasik , author M. A. \ Wolak , author X. Xi ,\ and\ author F. Marsili ,\ title title High- Operating - Temperature Superconductin...

    doi

  43. [51]

    author author A. E. \ Velasco , author D. P. \ Cunnane , author S. Frasca , author T. Melbourne , author N. Acharya , author R. Briggs , author A. D. \ Beyer , author M. D. \ Shaw , author B. S. \ Karasik , author M. A. \ Wolak , author V. B. \ Verma , author A. E. \ Lita , au...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.