Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 50 references

COSINUS -- a model-independent challenge of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter claim with cryogenic NaI detectors operated in a new low-background facility

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dual-readout NaI crystals will settle DAMA's dark matter claim

desk verdict A transparent, well-written status report from a serious collaboration, but the 'completely rule out or confirm' projection rests on simulated detector parameters that need Run1 data before they can carry that weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02429 v1 pith:4MAR4PJG submitted 2025-07-03 physics.ins-det astro-ph.COhep-ex

G. Angloher , M. R. Bharadwaj , A. Böhmer , M. Cababie , I. Colantoni , I. Dafinei , N. Di Marco , C. Dittmar
show 35 more authors
L. Einfalt F. Ferella F. Ferroni S. Fichtinger A. Filipponi M. Friedl L. Gai M. Gapp M. Heikinheimo K. Heim M. N. Hughes K. Huitu M. Kellermann R. Maji M. Mancuso L. Pagnanini F. Petricca S. Pirro F. Pröbst G. Profeta A. Puiu F. Reindl K. Schäffner J. Schieck P. Schreiner C. Schwertner K. Shera M. Stahlberg A. Stendahl M. Stukel C. Tresca S. Yue V. Zema Y. Zhu N. Zimmermann (The COSINUS Collaboration)
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detastro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords darkmatterdirectdetectionannualmodulationDAMA/LIBRAcross-checkcryogeniccalorimetersodiumiodidetransition-edgesensorremoTESparticlediscrimination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

COSINUS is the only experiment that operates sodium iodide (NaI) crystals at millikelvin temperatures and reads both the phonon (heat) and scintillation light signals for every interaction. The paper argues that the ratio of these two signals separates nuclear recoils from electron/gamma backgrounds event by event, creating a nearly background-free window for dark matter signals. With that window, 100 kg·d of exposure could confirm or rule out the standard dark matter interpretation of the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation, and 1000 kg·d would test the signal without assuming a particular dark matter halo or interaction mechanism. This matters because DAMA/LIBRA uses NaI, while other NaI-based searches measure only scintillation light and are limited by quenching-factor and particle-identification systematics that COSINUS avoids by construction.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the remoTES (remote transition-edge sensor) readout combined with a separate silicon light detector. A thin tungsten TES is fabricated on a separate wafer rather than on the NaI crystal itself; a gold pad evaporated on the crystal is connected to the TES by a single gold wire bond, so phonons produced by an interaction flow into the TES while the fragile, hygroscopic crystal is never processed in the TES fabrication. In parallel, scintillation photons are absorbed in a silicon beaker and lid and read by a second TES. The measured ratio of light energy to phonon energy (light yield) places each event in one of three bands, electrons/gammas at light yield 1, sodium recoils lower, and iodine recoils lower still, and the acceptance region between the sodium band and the 99% lower boundary of the iodine band is where dark matter nuclear recoils are expected. The phonon channel is unquenched, so the total deposited energy is known precisely regardless of recoil type.

What would settle it

Measure the actual phonon baseline resolution and light-detector noise of the first production 34.8 g modules in the first cooldown; if the phonon resolution exceeds about 0.2 keV or the light resolution exceeds about 0.11 keVee, the quoted 100 kg·d sensitivity no longer follows. A completed 100 kg·d run that observes no nuclear recoils in the acceptance region beyond the simulated background leakage would rule out the standard dark matter interpretation of DAMA/LIBRA.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that reading both phonons and scintillation light from the same NaI crystal changes the DAMA/LIBRA cross-check from a statistical, quenching-limited comparison into a direct measurement of the nuclear recoil rate. Because COSINUS uses the same NaI target material, the DAMA modulation amplitude cannot exceed the average rate COSINUS observes in its acceptance region; a null result at sufficient exposure therefore rules out a dark matter-nucleus origin without assuming a particular halo model. In the standard Maxwellian, elastic-scattering scenario the projected sensitivity is reached already at 100 kg·d, even with an energy threshold as high as 6 keV. Using the full DAMA modulation spectrum, the paper projects a 3σ exclusion at about 250 kg·d and a 5σ signal confirmation at about 150 kg·d. The experiment has been built and commissioned, and an eight-module data-taking run is planned to start in late 2025.

Load-bearing premise

The projected sensitivity assumes that the final 34.8 g detector modules will perform like the smaller prototypes: phonon resolution near 0.2 keV, light resolution near 0.11 keVee, an electron background of about 1 count per keV per kg per day, a muon veto efficiency of 97%, and a chosen signal survival curve; real modules that fall short of any of these numbers would need more exposure to reach the same conclusions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If 100 kg·d of exposure is collected, a standard dark matter interpretation of the DAMA/LIBRA modulation will be confirmed or excluded, independent of the low-energy quenching factor systematics that affect room-temperature NaI searches.
  • A single 34.8 g module running for one year already reaches enough sensitivity to clarify the standard scenario, so the cross-check does not have to wait for the full eight-module array.
  • If no nuclear recoil signal appears after about 250 kg·d, the dark matter-nucleus origin of the DAMA modulation is excluded with no assumptions about the halo, because the observed modulation amplitude cannot exceed the average rate in the same NaI target.
  • A positive signal could be confirmed at 5σ significance with as little as roughly 150 kg·d, and the Run2 exposure of 1000 kg·d would test the signal independently of the dark matter velocity distribution and interaction details.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the final 34.8 g modules meet the assumed 0.2 keV phonon resolution and 0.11 keVee light resolution, the same dual-readout design could be applied to other scintillating targets, making quenching-factor systematics a benchmarked quantity rather than a dominant uncertainty for those targets as well.
  • Beyond the paper: the bin-by-bin rate bound used here is target-agnostic; in principle any claimed annual modulation signal in any target could be cross-checked by any same-target experiment that measures total nuclear-recoil rate only, provided the exposures are adequate.
  • Beyond the paper: a first look at the Run1 calibration data will be the earliest decisive test of the projections, because if the measured survival efficiency at threshold is lower than the assumed 50% or the background is higher than 1 count/(keVee kg d), the 100 kg·d milestone will need to grow.
  • Beyond the paper: if a positive signal appears, the two annual cycles of Run2 will provide a first modulation-period check, but a dedicated longer run would be needed to establish a galactic-origin signature with high confidence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the COSINUS experiment, a cryogenic NaI detector program at LNGS that reads out both phonons and scintillation light from the same event, and argues that this dual-channel readout provides event-by-event particle discrimination. It describes the remoTES sensor concept, the detector module design for COSINUS-1π Run1 with 34.8 g crystals, the underground facility including the dilution refrigerator and water-Cherenkov muon veto, and gives sensitivity projections for a 100 kg·d exposure in the standard WIMP scenario and for a model-independent cross-check of the DAMA/LIBRA modulation signal at exposures up to 1000 kg·d. The projections use the Yellin optimum interval, profile likelihood, and Feldman-Cousins methods, and rely on inputs from a 3.7 g prototype measurement, the COSINUS Conceptual Design Report, and simulations of backgrounds and veto efficiency. The central claims are that 100 kg·d will rule out or confirm a standard-scenario dark-matter origin of the DAMA signal and that 1000 kg·d will provide an unambiguous, model-independent test.

Significance. If the projected performance is realized, COSINUS would be the first NaI experiment to combine low-threshold phonon readout with event-by-event electron/nuclear recoil discrimination, and it would provide a genuinely target-matched challenge to the DAMA/LIBRA claim. The statistical methods used in the projections are standard and transparently described, and the in-situ determination of quenching factors is an important advantage over scintillation-only experiments. The paper also leverages a companion model-independent framework [45] based on the fact that a modulation amplitude cannot exceed the average rate in the same energy bin, which is a conceptually clean way to avoid halo and interaction assumptions. The significance is therefore high if the assumed detector resolutions and background levels hold, but those assumptions are not yet demonstrated with the final detector modules, so the quantitative sensitivity claims are conditional rather than established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Projections (p. 7) and Fig. 4] The acceptance-region leakage of about one event per 100 kg·d shown in Fig. 4 is the load-bearing quantity for the 'quasi-background-free' premise and for the 100 kg·d and 1000 kg·d sensitivity claims, but it is a simulation output rather than a measured result. Its dominant inputs—the light-detector resolution σ_L=0.11 keVee taken from the 2019 CDR, the phonon resolution σ=0.2 keV extrapolated from the 3.7 g prototype via the electrothermal feedback model, and the flat 1 c/(keVee kg d) plus 600 µBq/kg 40K background—have not been validated with the final 34.8 g modules. Because the acceptance region is bounded on the low-light-yield side by the Gaussian tail of the β/γ band, a factor-of-two degradation of σ_L at low energies can increase the leakage by orders of magnitude. The paper calls the assumptions conservative but gives no systematic scan of the required exposure against σ_L, the background rate, or the efficiency. Please add such a scan or explicitly moderate the central claims until Run1 calibration data validate these inputs.
  2. [Projections and 'Additional new physics cases', item ii] The background model used in the projections contains only β/γ, 40K, and neutron components; the low-energy excess (LEE) that is commonly observed in cryogenic phonon detectors is mentioned only as an outlook topic for other absorber materials and is not included or bounded in the projection. If a LEE component appears in the NaI modules at the few-keV scale, it would populate the acceptance region and directly inflate the leakage, so the absence of such a component should be justified with a measurement or included as a nuisance parameter in the sensitivity study.
  3. [Footnote 10, Projections section] The survival efficiency is defined as ε(E) = 0.5 + 0.26 Erf(E − Ethr). The argument of the error function is dimensionful, so without a width parameter (for example, Erf((E − Ethr)/Δ)) the efficiency curve is not mathematically defined and the projections cannot be reproduced. Please specify the complete functional form with all parameters and their units.
  4. [Conclusion] The conclusion states that with 100 kg·d COSINUS 'will be able to completely rule out or confirm' a dark-matter origin of the DAMA signal and that Run2 'will deliver an unambiguous test.' These statements are stronger than what the presented calculations support: Fig. 9 shows median profile-likelihood sensitivity, and the model-independent curves in Fig. 10 inherit the assumed leakage. Please rephrase to make the dependence on the assumed detector performance and the median nature of the projections explicit, for example 'under the assumed resolutions and background model' and 'on median sensitivity.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section heading] The heading 'Cryostat and data acquistion' contains a typo; it should read 'data acquisition.'
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The abbreviations 'Sim bck events' and 'Bck events inside AR' should be spelled out or defined in the caption for readability.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract says data taking 'is planned to begin in late 2025' while the introduction says it 'is scheduled to begin in late 2025'; the two statements are consistent, but the paper should avoid implying that the experiment has already collected the projected data. A phrase such as 'the projected sensitivity assumes' would prevent over-reading.
  4. [References] Reference [41] for the DAMA/LIBRA compatible islands is from 2009; consider also citing the more recent DAMA/LIBRA phase-2 modulated spectra [2–4] in the context of the standard-scenario interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the sensitivity projections are extrapolations from independent prototype data and external model-independent inequalities, not reductions to their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are the standard-scenario exclusion projection (Fig. 9) and the model-independent DAMA cross-check (Fig. 10). The former is an extrapolation from the independently published 3.7 g prototype measurement [20] via the electrothermal-feedback model [38], with explicitly stated conservative assumptions on resolution, threshold, background, and efficiency. None of these parameters is fitted to DAMA data or to the target conclusion, so the projection is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The latter relies on the inequality that a modulation amplitude cannot exceed the average rate in the same energy bin, cited to the external derivation [44], and on the companion unfolding study [45], which transforms the DAMA spectrum into a predicted COSINUS recoil-rate spectrum; this transformation is a physical hypothesis test, not a tautology. The self-citations to earlier COSINUS prototype work [19,20,23] and to the CDR [39] provide independent empirical or design inputs, and the cited results are externally published and falsifiable rather than assumed conclusions. The acceptance-region leakage in Fig. 4 is simulated rather than measured, and the projections are therefore conditional on detector-performance assumptions; that is a correctness or risk concern, not circularity. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no load-bearing argument is supported solely by an unverified self-citation. The paper is appropriately self-contained against external benchmarks such as DAMA/LIBRA data and COSINE-100 limits.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All inputs to the sensitivity projections are explicitly stated as assumptions. The free parameters are experimental performance or background assumptions, not fitted to the DAMA signal or to the target result. The model-independent claim rests on the rate inequality from ref. [44] and the unfolding analysis of ref. [45], both external to this paper. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Phonon energy resolution sigma = 0.2 keV (assumed conservative)
    Sets the 1 keV analysis threshold and is used in all sensitivity projections (Figure 9); not yet measured on the final 34.8 g modules, extrapolated from a 3.7 g prototype.
  • Light detector resolution sigma_L = 0.11 keVee (assumed)
    Taken from the COSINUS Conceptual Design Report [39]; controls the width of the light-yield bands and hence the background leakage into the acceptance region.
  • Electron background rate = 1 count/(keVee kg d)
    Assumed DAMA-compatible constant background; directly sets the expected background leakage in the acceptance region in Figure 4.
  • Intrinsic 40K activity = 600 microBq/kg
    Assumed internal background contribution used in the projections; crystal screening reports 6-22 ppb of 40K, but the 600 microBq/kg value is the projection input.
  • Signal survival efficiency parameters = epsilon(E) = 0.5 + 0.26 Erf(E - E_thr)
    Hand-chosen efficiency curve (50% at threshold, 76% above 3 keV) incorporating assumed losses from detector instabilities, quality cuts, and muon veto coincidences.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The DAMA modulation amplitude cannot exceed the total unmodulated rate in the same NaI target and energy bin.
    This is the basis of the model-independent cross-check (Figure 10 and Section 'Model-independent DAMA/LIBRA cross-check'), derived in ref. [44] and applied with the unfolded DAMA spectrum from ref. [45].
  • domain assumption The standard scenario assumes a Maxwellian dark matter velocity distribution and elastic DM-nucleus scattering.
    Used for the sensitivity projections in Figure 9 and the claim that 100 kg·d clarifies the standard scenario; explicitly referenced to ref. [12].
  • domain assumption Nuclear recoils off Na and I populate two Gaussian light-yield bands whose positions are set by energy-dependent quenching factors.
    The acceptance region definition and background-leakage simulation in Figure 4 depend on this band structure; prototype quenching factors from ref. [20] are used for the projections, with in-situ determination planned.
  • domain assumption The electrothermal feedback model of ref. [38] correctly extrapolates detector performance from the 3.7 g prototype to the 34.8 g modules.
    The 0.68 keV threshold estimate, and thus the 1 keV analysis threshold used in all projections, rests on this scaling model that has not been validated with the final modules.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of COSINUS -- a model-independent challenge of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter claim with cryogenic NaI detectors operated in a new low-background facility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4MAR4PJG

@misc{pith2026250702429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: COSINUS -- a model-independent challenge of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter claim with cryogenic NaI detectors operated in a new low-background facility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4MAR4PJG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02429}
}
abstract

Low-temperature detectors are a powerful technology for dark matter search, offering excellent energy resolution and low energy thresholds. COSINUS is the only experiment that combines scintillating sodium iodide (NaI) crystals with an additional phonon readout at cryogenic temperatures, using superconducting sensors (remoTES), alongside the conventional scintillation light signal. Via the simultaneous phonon and scintillation light detection, a unique event-by-event particle identification is enabled. This dual-channel approach allows for a model-independent cross-check of the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal with a moderate exposure of a few hundred kg d, while completely avoiding key systematic uncertainties inherent to scintillation-only NaI-based searches. COSINUS built and commissioned a dedicated low-background cryogenic facility at the LNGS underground laboratories. Data taking with eight NaI detector modules (COSINUS1$\pi$ Run1) is planned to begin in late 2025.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02429 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the remoTES detector design [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows photographs of the evaporator, the crys￾tal used for evaporation, and the resulting Au film. First prototype measurements proved very good performance of evaporated Au pads [22] 2 . 2 In collaboration with Prof. A. Bandarenka, TUM School of Nat￾ural Sciences, Physics of Energy Conversion and Storage, Garch￾ing, Germany [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Typical remoTES NaI pulse from an 55Fe calibra￾tion source with a fit to the pulse shape model [13]. The three time constants governing the pulse shape are shown as well. test facility underground at LNGS [19, 20]. For the un￾derground measurement, the Au pad was made from a circular gold foil with a radius of 0.75 mm and a thick￾ness of 1 µm. The cubic NaI target crystal had a volume of 1 cm3 corresponding to a mas… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The hatched area marks the region of exceptional sensitivity to the DAMA signal, cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sketch of a detector module for COSINUS-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Rendering of the COSINUS setup in hall B of LNGS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Photograph taken during the filling of the water [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projections of the COSINUS exclusion power in the standard scenario. The dashed lines show standard Yellin limits, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Discrimination power and sensitivity of COSINUS. Left: Expected event rate from background processes into the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    Angloheret al., COSINUS model-independent sensi- tivity to the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter signal, (2025), arXiv:2504.18263 [hep-ph], 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18263

    G. Angloheret al., COSINUS model-independent sensi- tivity to the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter signal, (2025), arXiv:2504.18263 [hep-ph], 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18263

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18263 2025

  2. [2]

    Bernabeiet al., First model independent results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2, Nucl

    R. Bernabeiet al., First model independent results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2, Nucl. Phys. At. Energy19, 307 (2018), 10.15407/jnpae2018.04.307

    work page doi:10.15407/jnpae2018.04.307 2018

  3. [3]

    Bernabeiet al., Further results from DAMA/LIBRA- phase2 and perspectives, Nucl

    R. Bernabeiet al., Further results from DAMA/LIBRA- phase2 and perspectives, Nucl. Phys. At. Energy22, 329 (2021), 10.15407/jnpae2021.04.329

    work page doi:10.15407/jnpae2021.04.329 2021

  4. [4]

    Bernabei et al

    R. Bernabei et al. , Annual modulation results from DAMA/LIBRA, EPJ Web Conf. 319, 10001 (2025), Publisher: EDP Sciences, 10.1051/epj- conf/202531910001

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Amaréet al., Performance of ANAIS-112 experiment after the first year of data taking, Eur

    J. Amaréet al., Performance of ANAIS-112 experiment after the first year of data taking, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 228 (2019), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6697-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6697-4 2019

  6. [6]

    Adhikariet al., Initial performance of the COSINE- 100 experiment, Eur

    G. Adhikariet al., Initial performance of the COSINE- 100 experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 107 (2018), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5590-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5590-x 2018

  7. [7]

    Barberio et al., The SABRE South technical de- sign report executive summary, J

    E. Barberio et al., The SABRE South technical de- sign report executive summary, J. Inst. 20, T04001 (2025), Publisher: IOP Publishing, 10.1088/1748- 0221/20/04/T04001

    doi:10.1088/1748- 2025

  8. [8]

    Antonelloet al., The SABRE project and the SABRE Proof-of-Principle, Eur

    M. Antonelloet al., The SABRE project and the SABRE Proof-of-Principle, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 363 (2019), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6860-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6860-y 2019

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Xu et al., Scintillation efficiency measurement of Na recoils in NaI(Tl) below the DAMA/LIBRA en- ergy threshold, Phys

    J. Xu et al., Scintillation efficiency measurement of Na recoils in NaI(Tl) below the DAMA/LIBRA en- ergy threshold, Phys. Rev. C 92, 015807 (2015), 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015807

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    Cintaset al., Measurement of the sodium and iodine scintillation quenching factors across multiple NaI(Tl) detectors to identify systematics, Phys

    D. Cintaset al., Measurement of the sodium and iodine scintillation quenching factors across multiple NaI(Tl) detectors to identify systematics, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014613 (2024), Publisher: American Physical Society, 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.014613

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Angloheret al., The COSINUS project - perspectives of a NaI scintillating calorimeter for dark matter search, 76 (2016), 1603.02214, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4278-3

    G. Angloheret al., The COSINUS project - perspectives of a NaI scintillating calorimeter for dark matter search, 76 (2016), 1603.02214, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4278-3

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Baxteret al., Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, Eur

    D. Baxteret al., Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 907 (2021), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09655-y

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Pröbst et al., Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers, J Low Temp Phys100, 69 (1995), 10.1007/BF00753837

    F. Pröbst et al., Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers, J Low Temp Phys100, 69 (1995), 10.1007/BF00753837

    1995 doi

  6. [14]

    P. Ferger et al., Cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec- tion A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and As- sociated Equipment 370, 157 (1996), 10.1016/0168- 9002(95)01068-8

    1996 doi

  7. [15]

    Angloher et al., First measurements of remoTES cryogenic calorimeters: Easy-to-fabricate particle detec- tors for a wide choice of target materials, Nucl

    G. Angloher et al., First measurements of remoTES cryogenic calorimeters: Easy-to-fabricate particle detec- tors for a wide choice of target materials, Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1045, 167532 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167532

    2023

  8. [16]

    Kellermann, Development and Operation of Next-Generation Low-Temperature Detectors for the 11 COSINUS Dark Matter Search , PhD thesis, TU München, 2025

    M. Kellermann, Development and Operation of Next-Generation Low-Temperature Detectors for the 11 COSINUS Dark Matter Search , PhD thesis, TU München, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    M. R. Bharadjaw, Development and Optimization of Novel Cryogenic Calorimeters for COSINUS, PhD the- sis, LMU München, est. 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Shera, Studies on remoTES-based Cryogenic Calorimeters for the COSINUS Experiment, Master’s thesis, TU München, 2023

    K. Shera, Studies on remoTES-based Cryogenic Calorimeters for the COSINUS Experiment, Master’s thesis, TU München, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    COSINUS Collaboration et al., Particle discrimination in a NaI crystal using the COSINUS remote TES design, Phys. Rev. D109, 082003 (2024), Publisher: American Physical Society, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.082003

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    COSINUS Collaboration et al., Deep-underground dark matter search with a COSINUS detector prototype, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043010 (2024), Publisher: American Physi- cal Society, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043010

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Zema et al., Description and Performance of the COSINUS remoTES Design, Journal of low temperature physics 217, 393 (2024), 10.1007/s10909-024-03201-2

    V. Zema et al., Description and Performance of the COSINUS remoTES Design, Journal of low temperature physics 217, 393 (2024), 10.1007/s10909-024-03201-2

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Heim, Studies on Evaporated Gold Thin Films for remoTES-based Cryogenic Detectors for the COSINUS Experiment, Master’s thesis, TU München, 2025

    K. Heim, Studies on Evaporated Gold Thin Films for remoTES-based Cryogenic Detectors for the COSINUS Experiment, Master’s thesis, TU München, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Angloher et al., A likelihood framework for cryo- genic scintillating calorimeters used in the CRESST dark matter search, Eur

    G. Angloher et al., A likelihood framework for cryo- genic scintillating calorimeters used in the CRESST dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 922 (2024), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13141-6

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    R. F. Lang et al., Scintillator Non-Proportionality and Gamma Quenching in CaWO 4, (2009), 10.48550/arXiv.0910.4414

    2009 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of an unknown background, Phys

    S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of an unknown background, Phys. Rev. D 66, 032005 (2002), 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.032005

    2002 doi

  18. [26]

    Yellin, Extending the optimum interval method , arXiv:0709.2701 (2007), http://arxiv.org/abs/0709

    S. Yellin, Extending the optimum interval method , arXiv:0709.2701 (2007), http://arxiv.org/abs/0709. 2701

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    stanford.edu/Upperlimit/

    Optimum Interval Software, 2011, http://cdms. stanford.edu/Upperlimit/

    2011

  20. [28]

    Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter search, Eur

    G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1 (2012), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1971-8

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    Kuźniak, M

    M. Kuźniak, M. G. Boulay, and T. Pollmann, Surface roughness interpretation of 730 kg days CRESST-II results, Astropart. Phys. 36, 77 (2012), 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.005

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    et al., Simulation-based design study for the passive shielding of the COSINUS dark mat- ter experiment, Eur

    Angloher, G. et al., Simulation-based design study for the passive shielding of the COSINUS dark mat- ter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 248 (2022), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10184-5

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Kellermannet al., A Vibration Decoupling System for TES Operation in the COSINUS Dry Dilution Refrigera- tor, J Low Temp Phys217, 418 (2024), 10.1007/s10909- 024-03206-x

    M. Kellermannet al., A Vibration Decoupling System for TES Operation in the COSINUS Dry Dilution Refrigera- tor, J Low Temp Phys217, 418 (2024), 10.1007/s10909- 024-03206-x

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Abele et al., The CRAB facility at the TU Wien TRIGA reactor: status and related physics program, (2025), arXiv:2505.15227 [physics], 10.48550/arXiv.2505.15227

    H. Abele et al., The CRAB facility at the TU Wien TRIGA reactor: status and related physics program, (2025), arXiv:2505.15227 [physics], 10.48550/arXiv.2505.15227

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Strausset al., The ν-cleus experiment: a gram-scale fiducial-volume cryogenic detector for the first detection of coherent neutrino–nucleus scattering, Eur

    R. Strausset al., The ν-cleus experiment: a gram-scale fiducial-volume cryogenic detector for the first detection of coherent neutrino–nucleus scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 506 (2017), https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5068-2

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    Ambrosio et al., Vertical muon intensity measured with MACRO at the Gran Sasso laboratory, Phys

    M. Ambrosio et al., Vertical muon intensity measured with MACRO at the Gran Sasso laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3793 (1995), 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3793

    1995 doi

  27. [35]

    Angloheret al., Water Cherenkov muon veto for the COSINUS experiment: design and simulation optimiza- tion, 84 (2024), 2406.12870, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12923-2

    G. Angloheret al., Water Cherenkov muon veto for the COSINUS experiment: design and simulation optimiza- tion, 84 (2024), 2406.12870, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12923-2

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Angloheret al., Neutrino flux sensitivity to the next galactic core-collapse supernova in COSINUS, J

    G. Angloheret al., Neutrino flux sensitivity to the next galactic core-collapse supernova in COSINUS, J. Cos- mol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 037 (2025), Publisher: IOP Publishing, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/037

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Al Kharusi et al., SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger as- tronomy, 23, 031201, 10.1088/1367-2630/abde33

    S. Al Kharusi et al., SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger as- tronomy, 23, 031201, 10.1088/1367-2630/abde33

    doi

  30. [38]

    Wagner,Towards next-generation cryogenic dark mat- ter searches with superconducting thermometers, PhD thesis, TU Wien, 2023, 10.34726/hss.2023.106550

    F. Wagner,Towards next-generation cryogenic dark mat- ter searches with superconducting thermometers, PhD thesis, TU Wien, 2023, 10.34726/hss.2023.106550

    2023

  31. [39]

    Angloheret al., COSINUS Conceptual Design Report, (2019), CERN-COSINUS-2021-001, https://cds.cern

    G. Angloheret al., COSINUS Conceptual Design Report, (2019), CERN-COSINUS-2021-001, https://cds.cern. ch/record/2798447

    2019

  32. [40]

    Fuß, Simulation based Neutron Background Stud- ies for the CRESST and COSINUS Dark Matter Search Experiments, PhD thesis, TU Wien, 2022, 10.34726/hss.2022.86617

    A. Fuß, Simulation based Neutron Background Stud- ies for the CRESST and COSINUS Dark Matter Search Experiments, PhD thesis, TU Wien, 2022, 10.34726/hss.2022.86617

    2022

  33. [41]

    Savage, G

    C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and K. Freese,Com- patibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009, 010 (2009), 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/04/010

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    C. A. J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021), 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.251802

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Adhikariet al., Strong constraints from COSINE-100 on the DAMA dark matter results using the same sodium iodide target, Sci

    G. Adhikariet al., Strong constraints from COSINE-100 on the DAMA dark matter results using the same sodium iodide target, Sci. Adv. 7, eabk2699 (2020), Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 10.1126/sciadv.abk2699

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Kahlhoefer, F

    F. Kahlhoefer, F. Reindl, K. Schäffner, K. Schmidt- Hoberg, and S. Wild, Model-independent comparison of annual modulation and total rate with direct de- tection experiments, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 2018, 074 (2018), 10.1088/1475- 7516/2018/05/074

    2018 doi

  37. [46]

    G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins,Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998), Publisher: American Physical Society, 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.3873

    1998 doi

  38. [47]

    Baxteret al., Low-Energy Backgrounds in Solid-State Phonon and Charge Detectors, (2025), Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1, 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.08859

    D. Baxteret al., Low-Energy Backgrounds in Solid-State Phonon and Charge Detectors, (2025), Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1, 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.08859

    2025 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    P.Adari et al., EXCESS workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra, SciPost Physics Proceedings , 001 (2022), 10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.9.001

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    Zemaet al., Dark matter-electron scattering search us- ing cryogenic light detectors, 110, 123012, 10.1103/Phys- RevD.110.123012

    V. Zemaet al., Dark matter-electron scattering search us- ing cryogenic light detectors, 110, 123012, 10.1103/Phys- RevD.110.123012

    doi

  41. [50]

    D. L. Heliset al., First measurement of Gallium Arsenide as a low-temperature calorimeter, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 749 (2024), arXiv:2404.15741, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 13123-8

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Melchiorre et al., First measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter: achievements and prospects, sub

    A. Melchiorre et al., First measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter: achievements and prospects, sub. to Eur. Phys. J. C (to be published)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.