Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Hierarchical Structures of Quantum Geometric Spectrum in Quasicrystals: A Renormalization-Group Study

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that at the critical point of a 1D quasiperiodic system the quantum metric obeys $\mathcal{G} \propto (\Delta E)^{-k}$ with $k$ fixed by golden-ratio renormalization-group exponents, a scaling absent in extended and…

desk verdict A fresh RG argument connecting quantum metric to spectral gap scaling in the Fibonacci chain, with solid numerics but a load-bearing assumption deferred to a missing Supplementary Material. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04213 v2 pith:BXONJ2HI submitted 2025-07-06 cond-mat.mes-hall

Jundi Wang , Yuxiao Chen , Huaqing Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantummetricquasicrystalFibonaccichainAubry-André-Harpermodelreal-spacerenormalizationgroupspectralfractalitywavefunctioncriticalitygoldenratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the quantum metric, a geometric measure of how spatially spread the occupied wavefunctions are, grows hierarchically as the Fermi energy sits in smaller spectral gaps of a one-dimensional quasiperiodic system at criticality. For the Fibonacci chain, the authors derive analytically, via a real-space renormalization group, that $\mathcal{G} \propto (\Delta E)^{-k}$, with $k_{\mathrm{atomic}} = 3\log\tau/(2\log(w/s))$ and $k_{\mathrm{molecular}} = 2\log\tau/\log(w/2s)$, where $\tau$ is the golden ratio. The same inverse power law appears at the critical point of the Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper model but is absent in its extended and localized phases. The authors conclude that the quantum metric is a universal geometric indicator of quasiperiodic criticality and that quasicrystals are natural platforms for observing giant geometric responses.

What carries the argument

The central object is the real-space quantum metric of Eq.~(3), $\mathcal{G} = \sum_{E_\alpha < E_F < E_\beta} |\langle\psi_\alpha|\hat{x}|\psi_\beta\rangle|^2$, which measures the dipole coupling between occupied and empty states across the Fermi level. The argument is carried by a perturbative real-space renormalization group for the Fibonacci chain: an atomic decimation reduces $F_n$ sites to $F_{n-3}$ with hoppings $(s,w) \to (-w^2/s,\, w^3/s^2)$, and a molecular decimation reduces to $F_{n-2}$ with hoppings $(s,w) \to (\pm w/2,\, w^2/2s)$. Each RG step multiplies the lattice constant by a power of $\tau$ and the quantum metric by $\tau^m$, producing the scaling relation of Eq.~(6) and the exponents $k_{\mathrm{atomic}} = 3\log\tau/(2\log(w/s))$, $k_{\mathrm{molecular}} = 2\log\tau/\log(w/2s)$. This machinery converts the self-similar spectrum into a quantitative statement about geometry.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate $\mathcal{G}$ for a Fibonacci chain with $w/s = 0.8$ and fit $\log \mathcal{G}$ versus $\log \Delta E$ for gaps below $10^{-2}$; if the fitted slope deviates from $\min(k_{\mathrm{atomic}}, k_{\mathrm{molecular}})$ beyond numerical uncertainty, the RG exponents do not extend away from the perturbative limit. For the AAH model, check that the power law at $V=2t$ survives system sizes above $10^4$ sites; a slope that drifts with system size would indicate finite-size mimicry rather than true critical scaling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the real-space quantum metric $\mathcal{G}(E_F) = \sum_{E_\alpha < E_F < E_\beta} |\langle\psi_\alpha|\hat{x}|\psi_\beta\rangle|^2$, the paper shows that in the off-diagonal Fibonacci chain the metric is not featureless: it fluctuates in a fractal pattern as the Fermi level crosses the spectrum, with each step up the hierarchy multiplying $\mathcal{G}$ by $\tau^2$ or $\tau^3$. Scatter plots of $\mathcal{G}$ against the size $\Delta E$ of the gap containing the Fermi level collapse onto an inverse power law. The paper's analytic contribution is the derivation of this law from two decimation transformations, atomic and molecular, each of which maps a Fibonacci chain to a smaller Fibonacci chain with renormalized hoppings. The resulting exponents $k_{\mathrm{atomic}}$ and $k_{\mathrm{molecular}}$ organize the numerical data and set a theoretical upper bound, and the same scaling is found at the critical point of the Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper model, tying the effect to wavefunction criticality rather than to the specific substitution rule.

Load-bearing premise

The entire exponent derivation rests on the assumption that discarding sites during a renormalization step does not appreciably change the quantum metric, because those sites have tiny wavefunction weight; if that is wrong for a given modulation strength, the precise power-law exponents are not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The quantum metric at any small gap in a Fibonacci chain can be connected to the metric at the largest gap by a definite sequence of atomic or molecular RG steps, so the geometric response is inherited from the spectral hierarchy.
  • Because the power law appears at the critical point of the Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper model and vanishes in both extended and localized phases, it can serve as a diagnostic of criticality in quasiperiodic systems.
  • The superfluid stiffness of a superconducting Fibonacci chain should follow the same hierarchical oscillations as the quantum metric, giving a measurable transport signature of the geometric criticality.
  • The divergent enhancement of the quantum metric in quasicrystals opens a route to large quantum-geometric effects, such as nonlinear responses and superfluid weight, beyond what periodic flat bands provide.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the paper does not compute is the quantum metric of other substitution chains such as Thue-Morse or period-doubling lattices; their known RG decimations would yield different exponents $k$ from the same logic and would test how universal the mechanism is.
  • The Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper numerics are shown at $V=2t$; measuring the $\mathcal{G}$--$\Delta E$ slope as a function of $V$ near the critical point could reveal whether the power law survives only exactly at criticality or in a critical window.
  • In photonic quasicrystal experiments, one could probe the prediction directly by measuring the transverse spread of a wave packet launched at a Fermi level inside a small spectral gap, expecting the spread to grow as the gap shrinks.
  • The claimed link between quantum metric and superfluid stiffness hints at a quantitative bound connecting the geometric indicator to superconducting properties in quasiperiodic systems, a statement the authors only illustrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quantum metric in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, focusing on the off-diagonal Fibonacci chain. Using exact diagonalization, it shows that the quantum metric G, computed from the real-space projector formula, displays a hierarchical structure correlated with the fractal energy spectrum and obeys an inverse power law G ∝ (ΔE)^k with negative k. The authors derive k for the FC from real-space RG recursions, obtaining k_atomic = 3 log τ/(2 log(w/s)) and k_molecular = 2 log τ/log(w/(2s)), and argue that the same scaling appears at the critical point of the AAH model but is absent in its extended and localized phases. The central claim is that the quantum metric is a universal geometric indicator of quasiperiodic criticality.

Significance. Should the derivation be fully supported, the paper would establish a new analytic relation between quantum geometry and spectral fractality in quasicrystals, with parameter-free exponents arising from the self-similar RG structure. The numerical evidence in Fig. 2 is suggestive, and the contrast between critical and non-critical AAH phases is an appealing falsifiable signature. However, the analytic core rests on the unproven assumption that RG decimation preserves the quantum metric, with proofs deferred to a Supplementary Material that is not included in the submission; at present the result is conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (6) / Renormalization-Group Theory] The first equality of Eq. (6) rests on the assertion 'Since the RG transformations preserve wavefunction structure, they necessarily preserve quantum metric properties as well.' This is the load-bearing assumption of the paper, but it is not demonstrated in the main text. The atomic and molecular decimations remove sites in a Fibonacci pattern, so the retained sites are not uniformly spaced; the equality G(E_F;H(s,w,F_n),a)=G(E_F;H(Rs,Rw,F_{n-m}),τ^m a) therefore requires that contributions of decimated sites either vanish or are exactly absorbed, and that the non-uniformity affects G only through a global length rescale. The proof is deferred to SM Secs. IV and V, but the SM is not included in the arXiv submission and the URL is a placeholder. Since Eq. (7) is derived from this equality, the analytic exponents are not established until this gap is filled.
  2. [Eq. (6), third line] The relation G(E_F;H(Rs,Rw,F_n),a)=τ^m G(E_F;H(Rs,Rw,F_{n-m}),a) is called a linear scaling of the quantum metric with system size and is said to be proven in SM Sec. V. This is not a trivial consequence of Eq. (2) for a finite chain with fixed filling and boundary conditions, and the factor τ^m is essential for the final exponents. Please include the proof or a derivation sketch in the main text or in an accessible supplement.
  3. [Universality / Fig. 3] The conclusion that the G-ΔE inverse scaling is present at the critical point (V=2t) and absent in the extended (V=1.5t) and localized (V=2.5t) phases is based on visual inspection of log-log scatter plots. Since the universality across quasiperiodic paradigms is a central claim, provide a quantitative analysis for each regime—for example, a fitted exponent with confidence interval and a correlation coefficient or a residual analysis—to demonstrate both the presence and the absence of the scaling.
  4. [After Eq. (7)] The statement that 'the red dashed line with a slope of min(k_atomic, k_molecular) marks the theoretical upper bound for G at spectral gap ΔE' is presented without derivation. It is not obvious why the minimum of the two exponents yields an upper bound rather than a typical or average scaling, nor how the sequence of RG steps from the largest gap to each scatter point is constructed. This comparison is the main quantitative evidence for the exponents, so it should be justified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title / Abstract] The term 'quantum geometric spectrum' is not defined in the paper; the text computes the quantum metric as a function of Fermi energy. Consider rephrasing to 'quantum metric as a function of energy' or defining the term explicitly.
  2. [After Eq. (7)] Writing G ∝ (ΔE)^k with k negative is mathematically correct but potentially confusing; the inverse power-law form should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Figs. 2(b) and 3] The color bar labeled 'contribution ratio of the eigenstate pair bordering each gap' is not defined in the text; specify the precise formula for this ratio.
  4. [Reference [8]] The arXiv identifier 1012.1337 corresponds to a 2010 posting, not 2013 as printed; please verify the citation.
  5. [Supplemental Material URL] The supplemental material URL 'http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxx' is a placeholder; in addition to the scientific issue raised in Major Comment 1, this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the RG derivation of the quantum-metric scaling exponents is self-contained and the deferred preservation proof is a completeness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, G proportional to (Delta E)^{-k} with exponents in Eq. (7), is derived from the assumed RG covariance of the quantum metric stated in Eq. (6), combined with the known Fibonacci-chain RG recursions in Eqs. (4)-(5) and the Fibonacci length ratios. The exponents k_atomic = 3 log(tau)/(2 log(w/s)) and k_molecular = 2 log(tau)/log(w/(2s)) are parameter-free consequences of these recursions and are not fitted to the G versus Delta E data; the red dashed bound in Fig. 2(b) is determined analytically and then compared with numerics, not extracted from them. The load-bearing physical assumption is that the real-space RG transformations preserve quantum-geometric properties because they preserve wavefunction structure, as asserted in the sentence 'Since the RG transformations preserve wavefunction structure, they necessarily preserve quantum metric properties as well.' This is a self-similarity or covariance input, not a restatement of the target power law: it asserts how G transforms under a single RG step, whereas the derived power law is the result of iterating that step and combining it with the gap rescaling. The proof of this preservation is deferred to SM Secs. IV and V, and the SM URL in Ref. [40] is a placeholder, which I flag as an omitted-proof or completeness risk rather than circularity: if the preservation fails away from the perturbative limit |w/s| << 1, the analytic exponents would lack justification, but that would be a correctness gap, not a logical reuse of the conclusion. The RG recursions are attributed to standard external references [41,43] and are not self-citations, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The numerical persistence of the scaling for w/s near 1 is presented as a numerical observation, not as an analytic prediction obtained from the fitted exponents. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular: the input is the RG covariance assumption plus independent recursions, and the output is a nontrivial scaling relation that is checked against independent numerical data. The main caveats are the missing SM proofs and the strength of the covariance assumption, neither of which constitutes circularity under the criteria of this review.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Niu-Nori RG recursion relations (Eqs. 4-5), the assumption that the quantum metric is preserved under RG decimation, a linear-scaling lemma for G with system size (SM Sec. V), and the perturbative limit |w/s| << 1. No free parameters are fitted to the scaling data, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Real-space RG recursion relations for the off-diagonal Fibonacci chain (Eqs. 4-5): H(s,w,F_n) -> H(-w^2/s, w^3/s^2, F_{n-3}) and H(±w/2, w^2/2s, F_{n-2}).
    Adopted from Niu-Nori RG; not rederived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The quantum metric is invariant under energy rescaling and local gauge transformations of the hopping signs.
    Used in the fourth line of Eq. (6) to map the renormalized Hamiltonian back to the original parameters; stated without proof in main text.
  • domain assumption Quantum metric scales linearly with system size: G(E_F, F_n) = τ^m G(E_F, F_{n-m}).
    Load-bearing step in Eq. (6) third line; proof deferred to SM Sec. V, not available in main text.
  • domain assumption Perturbative limit |w/s| << 1 where RG eigenstates have dominant weight on atomic sites or molecular dimers.
    The RG derivation is controlled in this limit; numerical persistence for w/s -> 1 is claimed but not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper RG transformations preserve wavefunction structure and therefore preserve the quantum metric.
    This is the key self-similarity assumption underlying Eq. (6); asserted, not demonstrated in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hierarchical Structures of Quantum Geometric Spectrum in Quasicrystals: A Renormalization-Group Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BXONJ2HI

@misc{pith2026250704213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hierarchical Structures of Quantum Geometric Spectrum in Quasicrystals: A Renormalization-Group Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BXONJ2HI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04213}
}
abstract

Quantum geometry, characterized by the quantum metric and Berry curvature, is a powerful framework for understanding diverse physical phenomena in quantum materials, but its behavior in non-periodic systems remains largely uncharted. Here, we uncover a universal mechanism for the divergent enhancement of the quantum metric in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, governed by the interplay of wavefunction criticality and spectral fractality. Using the paradigmatic Fibonacci chain, we demonstrate that the quantum metric displays a hierarchical scaling structure that mirrors the fractal organization of the energy spectrum. A real-space renormalization-group analysis yields an analytic power-law scaling, $\mathcal{G} \propto (\Delta E)^{-k}$, between the quantum metric $\mathcal{G}$ and spectral gap $\Delta E$, with the exponent $k$ dictated by the system's self-similarity. This scaling persists in the critical Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper model but disappears in both its localized and extended phases, confirming its universality across different quasiperiodic paradigms and its unique link to criticality. Our results show that the quantum metric provides a sensitive geometric indicator of quasiperiodic criticality, and highlight quasicrystals as promising platforms for realizing unconventional giant quantum geometric effects beyond the limits of periodic crystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.04213 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of renormalization group transformations for the FC and its fractal spectrum. (a) Atomic RG transforma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Quantum metric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Quantum metric-gap relationship across different regimes of the AAH model. The quantum metric versus energy gap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum geometry, localization, and topological bounds of spin fluctuations

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dislocations in a 2D magnon crystal strongly enhance the quantum metric, and the enhancement tracks magnon localization and the topological-to-trivial transition in disordered arrays.

  2. Quantum metric and localization in a quasicrystal

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the Fibonacci chain, the quantum metric, including a newly introduced phasonic component, is bounded from below by the Chern-number gap labels, tying spatial localization to the fractal energy spectrum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur. Phys. J. B79, 121 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quan- tum geometry in condensed matter, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwae334 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, npj Quantum Mater.10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry and the hidden scales in materials, 6 Nat. Rev. Phys.8, 226 (2026)

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    Cheng, Quantum geometric tensor (fubini-study met- ric) in simple quantum system: A pedagogical introduc- tion (2013), arXiv:1012.1337 [quant-ph]

    R. Cheng, Quantum geometric tensor (fubini-study met- ric) in simple quantum system: A pedagogical introduc- tion (2013), arXiv:1012.1337 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Gao, Y.-F

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen,et al., Quantum metric nonlinear hall effect in a topological an- tiferromagnetic heterostructure, Science381, 181 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang,et al., Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topo- logical antiferromagnet, Nature621, 487 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    J. Wang, H. Zeng, W. Duan, and H. Huang, Intrin- sic nonlinear hall detection of the n´ eel vector for two- dimensional antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 056401 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unification of nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetore- sistance in metals by the quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026301 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B108, L201405 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Chiral photocurrent in parity-violating magnet and enhanced response in topo- logical antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X11, 011001 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Ulrich, J

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schny- der, Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear hall effect, Phys. Rev. B113, L201107 (2026)

    2026

  9. [17]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum ge- ometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 076502 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and V. Cr´ epel, Ideal chern bands as landau levels in curved space, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032048 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Verma, D

    N. Verma, D. Guerci, and R. Queiroz, Geometric stiffness in interlayer exciton condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236001 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Quantum- metric-enabled exciton condensate in double twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B105, L140506 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    T¨ orm¨ a, L

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Quantum metric and effective mass of a two-body bound state in a flat band, Phys. Rev. B98, 220511 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology- bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 167002 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Abouelkomsan, K

    A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Quan- tum metric induced phases in moir´ e materials, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L012015 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Julku, T

    A. Julku, T. J. Peltonen, L. Liang, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluid weight and berezinskii- kosterlitz-thouless transition temperature of twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 060505 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Kohmoto, L

    M. Kohmoto, L. P. Kadanoff, and C. Tang, Localization problem in one dimension: Mapping and escape, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1870 (1983)

    1983

  20. [28]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc3, 18 (1980)

    1980

  21. [29]

    P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  22. [30]

    Jagannathan, The fibonacci quasicrystal: Case study of hidden dimensions and multifractality, Rev

    A. Jagannathan, The fibonacci quasicrystal: Case study of hidden dimensions and multifractality, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045001 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zil- berberg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Y. E. Kraus and O. Zilberberg, Topological equivalence between the fibonacci quasicrystal and the harper model, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 116404 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Tanese, E

    D. Tanese, E. Gurevich, F. Baboux, T. Jacqmin, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, E. Galopin, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and E. Akkermans, Fractal energy spectrum of a polari- ton gas in a fibonacci quasiperiodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 146404 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Ganeshan, J

    S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 146601 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Y. Wang, X. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Yao, S. Chen, J. You, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 196604 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. In- guscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting bose–einstein condensate, Nature453, 895–898 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    D. J. Apigo, W. Cheng, K. F. Dobiszewski, E. Prodan, and C. Prodan, Observation of topological edge modes in a quasiperiodic acoustic waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 095501 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Marsal and A

    Q. Marsal and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Enhanced quantum metric due to vacancies in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 026002 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Ostlund, R

    S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H. J. Schellnhuber, and E. D. Siggia, One-dimensional schr¨ odinger equation with an almost periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1873 (1983)

    1983

  32. [40]

    [2, 6, 23, 24, 26–29, 31, 32, 34, 38, 39, 41–73, 76, 77]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxx, for more de- tails about the construction of the quasiperiodic models, the numerical results, and the details of pertur- bative renormalization group analysis, which includes Refs. [2, 6, 23, 24, 26–29, 31, 32,...

  33. [41]

    Niu and F

    Q. Niu and F. Nori, Renormalization-group study of one- dimensional quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2057 (1986)

    1986

  34. [42]

    Niu and F

    Q. Niu and F. Nori, Spectral splitting and wave-function scaling in quasicrystalline and hierarchical structures, Phys. Rev. B42, 10329 (1990)

    1990

  35. [43]

    Mac´ e, A

    N. Mac´ e, A. Jagannathan, and F. Pi´ echon, Fractal di- mensions of wave functions and local spectral measures on the fibonacci chain, Phys. Rev. B93, 205153 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Janot,Quasicrystals: a primer(OUP Oxford, 2012)

    C. Janot,Quasicrystals: a primer(OUP Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Janssen, G

    T. Janssen, G. Chapuis, and M. De Boissieu,Aperiodic crystals: from modulated phases to quasicrystals: struc- ture and properties(Oxford University Press, 2018). 7

    2018

  38. [46]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  39. [47]

    X.-C. Zhou, Y. Wang, T.-F. J. Poon, Q. Zhou, and X.- J. Liu, Exact new mobility edges between critical and localized states, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176401 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  41. [49]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    M. S. M. de Sousa, A. L. Cruz, and W. Chen, Mapping quantum geometry and quantum phase transitions to real space by a fidelity marker, Phys. Rev. B107, 205133 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Het´ enyi, Scaling of the bulk polarization in extended and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model, Phys

    B. Het´ enyi, Scaling of the bulk polarization in extended and localized phases of a quasiperiodic model, Phys. Rev. B110, 125124 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the the- ory of localization, Phys

    D. Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the the- ory of localization, Phys. Rep.13, 93 (1974)

    1974

  45. [53]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 673 (1979)

    1979

  46. [54]

    T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B. I. Shraiman, Fractal measures and their singular- ities: The characterization of strange sets, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1141 (1986)

    1986

  47. [55]

    Biddle and S

    J. Biddle and S. Das Sarma, Predicted mobility edges in one-dimensional incommensurate optical lattices: An ex- actly solvable model of anderson localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 070601 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Lahini, R

    Y. Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Moran- dotti, N. Davidson, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 013901 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Phys. Rev. X14, 011052 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamen- tal property of quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023158 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Topological bound on the structure factor, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206602 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Universal relation between energy gap and dielectric constant, Phys. Rev. B110, 155107 (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Long and F

    X. Long and F. Liu, Interplay of quantum and real-space geometry in the anomalous landau levels of singular flat bands (2025), arXiv:2505.03024 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Bellissard, Gap labelling theorems for schr¨ odinger op- erators, inFrom number theory to physics(Springer,

    J. Bellissard, Gap labelling theorems for schr¨ odinger op- erators, inFrom number theory to physics(Springer,

  55. [64]

    Simon, Almost periodic schr¨ odinger operators: A re- view, Adv

    B. Simon, Almost periodic schr¨ odinger operators: A re- view, Adv. Appl. Math.3, 463 (1982)

    1982

  56. [65]

    Mac´ e, A

    N. Mac´ e, A. Jagannathan, and F. Pi´ echon, Gap structure of 1d cut and project hamiltonians, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 809, 012023 (2017)

    2017

  57. [66]

    J. M. Luck, Cantor spectra and scaling of gap widths in deterministic aperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. B39, 5834 (1989)

    1989

  58. [67]

    Ingalls, Octagonal quasicrystal tilings, J

    R. Ingalls, Octagonal quasicrystal tilings, J. Non-Cryst. Solids153, 177 (1993)

    1993

  59. [68]

    C. Lin, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, Hyperunifor- mity variation with quasicrystal local isomorphism class, J. Phys. Condens. Matter29, 204003 (2017)

    2017

  60. [69]

    J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum distance and anomalous landau levels of flat bands, Nature584, 59 (2020)

    2020

  61. [70]

    J.-A. Wang, M. Assili, and P. Kotetes, Superfluid stiffness and josephson quantum capacitance: Adiabatic approach and topological effects, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023256 (2024)

    2024

  62. [71]

    Salerno, T

    G. Salerno, T. Ozawa, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Drude weight and the many-body quantum metric in one-dimensional bose systems, Phys. Rev. B108, L140503 (2023)

    2023

  63. [72]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  64. [73]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun.6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  65. [74]

    Marsal, P

    Q. Marsal, P. Holmvall, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Quan- tum metric and localization in a quasicrystal (2025), arXiv:2506.15575 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [75]

    J. Sun, H. Guo, and B.-J. Yang, Geometric superfluid weight in quasicrystals (2025), arXiv:2507.20540 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  67. [76]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Revisiting flat band supercon- ductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Phys. Rev. B106, 014518 (2022)

    2022

  68. [77]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, berry curvature, and super- fluid weight, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.