Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 58 references

A model for baryon production in spin-dependent string fragmentation

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin-1 diquarks tunneling out of the string give baryons a Collins asymmetry and a transverse polarization, with hyperon polarization matching data when the complex parameter $\mu_{qq}$ has a negative imaginary part.

desk verdict A useful, explicitly worked extension of the string+3P0 model to baryons, but the sign claims are parameter inputs and the anti-Lambda same-sign statement does not follow from the displayed equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06810 v1 pith:S7UPEWI6 submitted 2025-07-09 hep-ph

Albi Kerbizi , Xavier Artru This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords baryonproductionspin-dependentstringfragmentationCollinseffectspontaneoustransversepolarizationdiquark-antidiquarktunneling5D0wavehyperondecaysspindensitymatrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends a quantum-mechanical string fragmentation model, previously limited to mesons, to spin-1/2 baryons. It claims that baryons are produced when a diquark-antidiquark pair tunnels out of the string, and that spin-1 (pseudovector) diquarks are created predominantly in the $^5D_0$ wave ($L=S=2$, $J=0$). From this assumption the model derives a Collins effect for baryons from transversely polarized quarks and a spontaneous transverse polarization of baryons. With a negative imaginary part of the complex parameter $\mu_{qq}$, both effects have the signs observed for the pion Collins effect and for $\Lambda/\bar\Lambda$ hyperon polarization in $e^+e^-$ annihilation. The paper also supplies the decay machinery for polarized hyperons and a scheme for propagating spin information along the fragmentation chain, making the model ready for Monte Carlo implementation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-dependent diquark propagator, a $3\times 3$ matrix in spin space (Eq. 19), built from the $^5D_0$ wave function of a tunneling diquark-antidiquark pair. The $^5D_0$ wave means the pair has orbital angular momentum $L=2$ and spin $S=2$ combining to total $J=0$, the diquark analogue of the $^3P_0$ wave ($L=S=1$, $J=0$) used for quark-antiquark pair creation. Starting from that wave function, the paper replaces the longitudinal relative momentum by a free complex parameter $\mu_{qq}$, obtaining a propagator with off-diagonal entries proportional to $\mu_{qq}$ times transverse momentum; this is the mechanism that correlates spin with transverse momentum. The companion objects are the coupling matrices $\Gamma_B$ at the quark-baryon-diquark vertices, which connect the baryon Pauli spinor to the quark and diquark spinors. Together, the propagator and couplings form the splitting matrix $T = F \times \Delta_{qq} \times \Gamma_B$, whose square gives the polarized splitting functions and the spin density matrix of the produced baryon.

What would settle it

Measure the transverse-momentum dependence of the $\Lambda$ Collins asymmetry in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering with a transversely polarized target, alongside the spontaneous $\Lambda$ polarization in $e^+e^-$ annihilation. With $\operatorname{Im}(\mu_{qq})<0$ the model requires the baryon Collins asymmetry to have the same sign as the pion Collins asymmetry while the spontaneous polarization is negative; data showing opposite signs, or a $p_T$ dependence departing from $p_T H_1/(H_1^2+H_2)$, would rule out the $^5D_0$ diquark mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spin and transverse momentum of a tunneling spin-1 diquark are sufficient to generate the two leading transverse spin effects for baryons. The paper constructs a $3\times 3$ diquark propagator $\Delta_{qq}(k_T')$ from the assumption that diquark-antidiquark pairs leave the string in the $^5D_0$ wave, replacing the longitudinal relative momentum by a complex parameter $\mu_{qq}$. Combined with the quark-baryon-diquark couplings $\Gamma_{B,b}=\sigma_b$ and $\Gamma_{B,0}=1$, this yields splitting amplitudes for $q\to B+(qq)$ and $(qq)\to \bar B+q'$. The predicted baryon Collins analysing power is $\hat a_B^{(1)}(p_T) = -2\operatorname{Im}(\mu_{qq})\, p_T\, H_1(p_T^2)/(H_1^2+H_2)$, and the spontaneous polarization is the same expression with the opposite sign. For $\operatorname{Im}(\mu_{qq})<0$ the Collins effect has the same sign as pseudoscalar meson emission, while the spontaneous polarization is negative, as observed for $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$. Baryons emitted through scalar diquarks show no Collins effect, diluting the prediction according to the baryon's flavour wave function.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions rest on the assumption that string breakings produce spin-1 diquark-antidiquark pairs almost entirely in the $^5D_0$ wave, with the longitudinal relative momentum replaced by a complex parameter $\mu_{qq}$; if a significant $^1S_0$ admixture or different form factors were present, the signs and sizes of the baryon Collins effect and hyperon polarization would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $\operatorname{Im}(\mu_{qq})<0$, the baryon Collins effect in $q\to B+(qq)_1$ has the same sign as the pseudoscalar meson Collins effect and the opposite sign to the spontaneous polarization.
  • Baryons and antibaryons are predicted to have the same sign of spontaneous transverse polarization, since the $^5D_0$ diquark mechanism and the $^3P_0$ quark mechanism contribute with the same sign.
  • Baryons produced through scalar diquarks have a flat azimuthal distribution, so the predicted spin effects are diluted according to the scalar-diquark component of the baryon's flavour wave function.
  • Polarized hyperon decays, including non-leptonic, electromagnetic, and weak radiative channels, are incorporated with measured decay parameters, so the polarization predictions can be tracked through decay products.
  • The recursive rules for spin density and acceptance matrices allow the model to be put into a Monte Carlo event generator and compared quantitatively with data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A combined measurement of pion and $\Lambda$ Collins asymmetries in the same semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering experiment would directly test the sign linkage between Eqs. (26) and (30); the paper leaves this as a testable consequence rather than a derivation.
  • The dilution by scalar diquarks implies that the ratio of baryon Collins asymmetry to baryon polarization could serve as a measurement of the scalar-to-pseudovector diquark production ratio, a free parameter the paper leaves open.
  • The model's success in matching hyperon polarization suggests extending the same $^5D_0$ propagator to spin-3/2 baryons or to popcorn configurations with mesons between baryons; the paper mentions these as future work but does not derive the spin predictions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper extends the string+3P0 model of polarized string fragmentation to spin-1/2 baryons. Baryons are treated as quark-diquark bound states, and string breakings can produce either scalar or pseudovector diquark-antidiquark pairs, with the PV pair assumed to be created in the relative 5D0 state. The authors construct a 3x3 PV-diquark propagator depending on a new complex parameter µqq, introduce quark-baryon-diquark couplings, and derive splitting functions and spin density matrices for q→B+(qq) and (qq)→anti-B+q'. They obtain analytic expressions for a baryon Collins effect and for spontaneous transverse polarization of baryons and antibaryons, and they include polarized hyperon decays with acceptance matrices suitable for Monte Carlo implementation. The claimed agreement with the Belle sign of Λ and anti-Lambda polarization rests on choosing Im(µqq)<0 and on a comparison that is not actually carried out for the effective mixture of scalar and PV diquarks.

Significance. The algebraic framework is transparent and the paper is genuinely useful as a blueprint for implementing spin-dependent baryon production in event generators: the splitting amplitudes, spin-density-matrix recursion, and hyperon decay matrices are given in closed form, and the presentation is suitable for Monte Carlo implementation. The derivation of the functional forms of the baryon Collins effect and of the spontaneous transverse polarization is a real step beyond the meson-only string+3P0 model. If the sign issue for antibaryons is resolved and the parameter dependence is made explicit, the framework would be a solid basis for quantitative comparisons. At present, however, several phenomenological inputs—5D0 dominance, the replacement k_z→µqq, and the sign choice for Im(µqq)—are load-bearing, and the claimed sign agreement with Belle is partly an input rather than a derived prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.B, Eqs. (48) and (52)] The statement that the model predicts the same sign for baryon and antibaryon spontaneous polarization is not supported by the displayed equations. For an initial PV antidiquark with S_qq=0 and k_T=0, Eq. (48) gives S^(1)_anti-B,T = +2 Im(µq) z×p_T/N_qq because p_T=-k'_T, whereas the scalar-antidiquark splitting in Eq. (52) gives S^(0)_anti-B,T = -2 Im(µq) z×p_T/(|µq|^2+p_T^2). These two contributions have opposite signs, and the effective antibaryon spin density matrix analogous to Eq. (46) is never formed. The relative weight of the two contributions is controlled by the free parameter P_(qq)1/P_(qq)0, which Sec. VI.C quotes as ~0.03. The sign of the anti-Lambda polarization is therefore parameter-dependent, and the claimed agreement with BELLE in Sec. IV.B does not follow from Eqs. (48) and (52) as written.
  2. [III.C.1, Eq. (30), and IV.A, Eq. (42)] The sign of the predicted baryon Collins effect and of the baryon spontaneous polarization is fixed by hand through the assumption Im(µqq)<0. Eq. (30) and Eq. (42) are both linear in Im(µqq), and no tunneling boundary condition or other dynamical input is used to determine this sign. The paper should therefore present the BELLE agreement as a parameter-fixing condition, not as a prediction, or it should provide a dynamical argument that fixes Im(µqq)<0. As written, the central claim of agreement with the BELLE sign is partly circular.
  3. [Appendix A.2, Eq. (A6)] The 5D0-dominance assumption, i.e., A(k_T'^2)=0 in Eq. (A6), is load-bearing: it determines the specific form of the propagator in Eq. (19), and through it the signs and magnitudes of the observables in Eqs. (29)-(30) and (40)-(42). The order-of-magnitude estimate ⟨L⟩≈1.3 is suggestive but does not by itself establish dominance of the 5D0 wave. The authors should either provide a quantitative estimate of the 1S0 admixture or show, e.g., by adding a small A(k_T'^2) term, how the predicted signs and magnitudes would change. Without such an analysis, the robustness of the central predictions is not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (31)] In Eq. (31), the scalar-diquark splitting q→B+(qq)_0 is written with the coefficient |C_(qq)1,B,q|^2; this appears to be a typo for |C_(qq)0,B,q|^2, matching the notation used for the splitting (qq)_0→anti-B+q' in Eq. (38).
  2. [IV.A, after Eq. (42)] The sentence 'For Im(µqq) < 0 the baryon spontaneous is negative' is missing the word 'polarization' and should be rephrased, e.g., 'the spontaneous polarization of the baryon is negative.'
  3. [VII, Conclusions] In the Conclusions, the text reads 'For Im(µqq) < 0 the Collins effect for baryon production has the the same sign'; the duplicated article 'the' should be removed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The sign of the headline baryon/antibaryon spin asymmetries is carried by free parameters (Im mu_qq and the scalar/PV diquark ratio), so the 'agreement with Belle' is partly an input choice rather than a derived prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III.C.1 (Eq. (30)) and Sec. IV.A (Eq. (42)); parameter definition in Sec. II.C]
    "Assuming Im(µqq) < 0, the Collins effect for the baryon production is predicted to have the same sign as that expected from the classical string+5D0 model and shown in Fig. 3. ... For Im(µqq) < 0 the baryon spontaneous is negative, in agreement with the BELLE data on the spontaneous polarization of Λ and ¯Λ hyperons produced in e+e− annihilation."

    Equations (30) and (42) are both linear in Im(mu_qq): the Collins analysing power is -2 Im(mu_qq) pT H1/(H1^2+H2), and the spontaneous polarization is +2 Im(mu_qq) pT H1/(H1^2+H2) up to a sign convention. The paper states in Sec. II.C that 'the real and imaginary parts of mu_qq are free parameters of the model whose value must be fixed by comparison with data.' Therefore the sign that produces the claimed agreement with Belle is selected by hand through the choice Im(mu_qq)<0, rather than being an output of the tunneling dynamics. The pT shapes are non-trivial and derived, but the headline sign agreement reduces by construction to the sign of a free parameter.

  2. other [Sec. IV.B, Eqs. (48) and (52), and the sentence after Eq. (49)]
    "The second term is a source of spontaneous polarization for the baryon [c.f. with Eq. (2)] and, since in the string+3P0 model Im(µq) > 0, the polarization has the same sign as that arising in the splitting q → B + (qq)1 in Eq. (40). The model thus predicts the same sign for the spontaneous polarization of baryons and antibaryons, as observed for Λ and ¯Λ hyperons in e+e− annihilation at BELLE [17]."

    For the PV antidiquark channel, Eq. (48) gives a spontaneous term -2 Im(mu_q) z x k'_T, which is +2 Im(mu_q) z x pT for the emitted antibaryon because k'_T = -pT. For the scalar antidiquark channel, Eq. (52) gives +2 Im(mu_q) z x k'_T = -2 Im(mu_q) z x pT, the opposite sign. The paper never constructs an effective antibaryon spin density matrix analogous to Eq. (46), so the claimed same-sign result for Lambda and anti-Lambda is not derived from the displayed equations; its sign is controlled by the unconstrained scalar/PV diquark ratio. With the paper's own typical value P(qq)1/P(qq)0 ~ 0.03, the scalar channel would dominate and reverse the sign. Thus the anti-Lambda agreement with Belle is an assumed input, not a forced prediction.

full rationale

The model is a self-contained analytic construction: the splitting amplitudes, diquark propagator, spin density matrices, and hyperon decay formalism are all derived in the paper, and the pT-dependent functional forms in Eqs. (29), (30), (40), and (42) are nontrivial outputs of that construction. Much of the paper (spin transfer, hyperon decay, recursive propagation) does not reduce to its inputs. However, the two headline comparisons with data are not fully predicted. The sign of the baryon Collins asymmetry and spontaneous polarization is linear in Im(mu_qq), a free parameter whose sign is selected (Im(mu_qq)<0) to match Belle; the text itself labels the real and imaginary parts as free parameters to be fixed by comparison with data. The sign of the antibaryon polarization is even less constrained: the scalar and PV diquark channels give opposite signs, and no effective antibaryon density matrix is formed, so the same-sign-for-Lambda-and-anti-Lambda conclusion depends on an unstated choice of the scalar/PV ratio. This is partial circularity rather than a fully circular derivation: the shapes are derived, but the signs that constitute the claimed agreement with Belle are parameter inputs. No load-bearing self-citation was found; citations to the authors' earlier String+3P0 work supply the quark-propagator formalism, which is independently implemented and tested in StringSpinner, and the 5D0-dominance assumption is justified by an in-paper order-of-magnitude estimate rather than by citation alone.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's predictive content is concentrated in the new complex diquark parameter µqq and the 5D0 dominance assumption. All other parameters are carried over from the Lund model and the earlier string+3P0 works. No parameter is fitted in this paper, and the sign of Im(µqq) is chosen by hand to reproduce the hyperon polarization sign. This makes the headline 'predictions' partially parameter-driven. No new particles or forces are introduced; diquarks are known QCD constructs, and the new element is the phenomenological 5D0 diquark propagator, listed under axioms.

free parameters (7)
  • µq (complex quark mass) = Not fitted here; constrained by SIDIS and e+e- data in previous works
    Controls the quark 3P0 spin-transverse momentum correlation and enters meson and antibaryon splitting functions.
  • µqq (complex diquark mass parameter) = Not fitted; sign of Im(µqq) chosen to match hyperon polarization sign
    New parameter in the diquark propagator Eq. (19); Im(µqq) sets the size and sign of the baryon Collins effect and spontaneous polarization.
  • mqq (diquark mass) = Around 0.5 GeV, taken from earlier diquark model [45]
    Appears in the diagonal entries of the diquark propagator and in H2; the numerical value influences the pT dependence.
  • Lund parameters a, aD, bL = Not fitted; standard Lund model values
    Set the longitudinal momentum sharing in the splitting functions (Eqs. 6 and 29).
  • bT (transverse momentum cutoff) = Not fitted
    Width of fT(k_T^2) controlling the k_T distribution of created pairs.
  • Vector meson couplings GL, GT and fVM = From prior string+3P0 model
    Enter meson splitting functions and normalization; not central to the baryon extension.
  • Pqq/Pq and P(qq)1/P(qq)0 = Typical Pythia values around 0.1 and 0.03
    Relative probability for diquark pair tunneling and for pseudovector versus scalar diquark production; needed for a Monte Carlo implementation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption String breakings can occur by tunneling of diquark-antidiquark pairs from the vacuum with J^PC = 0++.
    Introduced in Sec. II.C and inspired by the Lund model [35]; no first-principles derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The (qq)(qq) pair is produced predominantly in the 5D0 state, i.e., A(k_T^2) = 0.
    Appendix A.2; justified by an estimate of the average orbital angular momentum; the entire diquark propagator Eq. (19) rests on this.
  • domain assumption The diquark propagator satisfies the LR symmetry condition Eq. (A1) and the general form Eq. (A2).
    Symmetry requirements 1 through 4 in Appendix A.1; these constrain but do not uniquely fix the functions g_i.
  • ad hoc to paper The quark-baryon-diquark couplings are V_(qq)0 = 1_4x4 and V_(qq)1 = γ5 γ^μ ε*_μ.
    Sec. II.B; two alternative forms are checked to give the same Pauli couplings, but this remains a model choice.
  • ad hoc to paper The longitudinal momentum k_z at the tunneling midpoint is replaced by the complex parameter µqq.
    Sec. II.C and Appendix A.2; this analytic continuation is phenomenological and not derived from QCD.
  • domain assumption Stark-effect admixtures of J = 2 and J = 4 states are ignored.
    Sec. II.C; the string medium is anisotropic, but the model neglects this effect.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A model for baryon production in spin-dependent string fragmentation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7UPEWI6

@misc{pith2026250706810,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A model for baryon production in spin-dependent string fragmentation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7UPEWI6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06810}
}
abstract

We introduce spin-1/2 baryons in the string+${}^3P_0$ model of hadronization, previously restricted to the production of pseudoscalar and vector mesons. Baryons are modeled as quark-diquark bound states and baryon production is described by the tunneling of diquark-antidiquark pairs at string breaking points. Diquarks can be scalar or pseudovector, the latter being produced in the relative ${}^5D_0$ state. Introducing the quark-baryon-diquark coupling, the relevant splitting amplitudes for the emission of baryons are constructed and used to explore analytically the model predictions. We find a Collins effect for baryon production in the fragmentations of transversely polarized quarks or diquarks as well as a baryon spontaneous transverse polarization. The hadronic decays of polarized hyperons are also included in the model, which is presented in a form suitable for the implementation in a Monte Carlo event generator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06810 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Space-time picture of spin-less string fragmentation (a), and of string breaking via the tunneling of a quark-antiquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Quark-antiquark pair tunneling in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Fragmentation of a string with a transversely po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Production of a baryon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diagram for the non-leptonic decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Diagram for the electromagnetic or radiative weak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (16) and Eq

    Splitting q → B + (qq)1 For the production of a baryon B in the splitting q → B + (qq)1, where ( qq)1 indicates a PV anti-diquark, the matrix ˆu(1) q can be obtained by first inserting Eq. (16) and Eq. (19) in the expression for t(qq),B,q in Eq. (11), and then using the obtained t(qq),B,q in Eq. (9). We write the resulting matrix ˆu(1) q as ˆu(1) q = X B ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (11) in Eq

    Splitting q → B + (qq)0 For the splitting q → B + (qq)0 we start by evaluating the matrix ˆu(0) q by inserting Eq. (11) in Eq. (9) and using the coupling in Eq. (16) for b = 0. We obtain ˆu(0) q = X B ˆu(0) q,B 12×2, ˆu(0) q,B = |C(qq)1,B,q |2. (31) The splitting function can be obtained from Eq. (22) by taking ˇρ(B) = 12×2, removing the diquark propagato...

    work page

  3. [3]

    longitudinal boost of k and k′ for fixed Φ and Φ′,

    work page

  4. [4]

    (12) in Eq

    Splitting (qq)1 → ¯B + q′ The ˆu(qq) matrix for the PV diquark splitting ( qq)1 → ¯B + q′ can be evaluated inserting Eq. (12) in Eq. (9). We obtain ˆu(qq)1 = X ¯B ˆu(qq)1, ¯B 13×3, ˆu(qq)1, ¯B = 3|Cq′, ¯B,(qq)1 |2 ⟨|µq|2 + k2 T⟩fT . (34) Inserting Eq. (34) and Eq. (12) in the splitting func- tion (23), and taking ˇρ( ¯B) = 1 2×2 and ˇρ(q′) = 1 2×2 we obta...

    work page

  5. [5]

    SPINFRAG: Spin-dependent string frag- mentation

    Splitting (qq)0 → ¯B + q′ Inserting Eq. (12) in Eq. (23) the splitting function for a scalar antidiquark reads Fq′, ¯B,(qq)0 (M ¯B, Z,pT ; kT ) = ˆu(qq)0, ¯B ˆu(qq)0 |D ¯B(M ¯B)|2 × 1 − Z Z a Z ε2 ¯B aD e−bLε2 ¯B /Z N −1 a,aD (ε2 ¯B) × f 2 T (k ′2 T ) |µq|2 + k ′2 T ⟨|µq|2 + k2 T⟩fT , (37) where ˆu(qq)0 = X ¯B ˆu(qq)0, ¯B, ˆu(qq)0, ¯B =|Cq′, ¯B,(qq)0 |2 ⟨...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Theoretical constraints on the propagator Indicating by Φ and Φ′ the initial and final (with re- spect to the propagation) three-dimensional spin wave- functions of the diquark, we require the amplitude Φ ′†∆(kT )Φ to be invariant under

    work page

  7. [7]

    simultaneous rotation of Φ, Φ′ and kT about the ˆz axis,

    work page

  8. [8]

    symmetry about any plane containing the ˆz axis,

    work page

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    J. C. Collins, S. F. Heppelmann, and G. A. Ladin- sky, Measuring transversity densities in singly polarized hadron hadron and lepton - hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 420, 565 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9305309

    1994 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The symmetry 2) implies 1)

    quark line reversal (LR) symmetry. The symmetry 2) implies 1). The LR symmetry in 4) is also called left-right symmetry in the Lund Model of string fragmentation [36]. We find that the LR symmetry implies for the propagator the condition ∆qq (−Rk) = R ∆T qq (k) R, (A1) where R...

  3. [11]

    The most general J P C= 0++ wave function is of the form Ψab(k) = A(k2) Ψ 1S0 ab + B(k2) Ψ 5D0 ab

    Diquark pair production from vacuum: the5D0 mechanism Let us start with the two possible wave functions of the ( qq)1 − (qq)1 pair having the J P C= 0 ++ quantum numbers of the vacuum Ψ 1S0 ab ∝ δab (A4) Ψ 5D0 ab ∝ −k2 3 δab + kakb, (A5) where k = k(qq) = −k(qq) is the relativ...

  4. [12]

    Electromagnetic decay The covariant matrix element describing the electro- magnetic decay Y → B′ + γ can be obtained by writing ˆMcov. = ˆMµ cov.ϕ∗ γ,µ, ϕµ γ being the polarization fourvec- tor of the emitted photon, and expanding ˆMµ cov.(p′, q) in terms of Dirac matrices, q ...

  5. [13]

    = F1 Γµϕ∗ γ,µ + iF2σµνqµϕ∗ γ,ν + F3γµγ5ϕ∗ γ,µ, where F1, F2 and F3 are form factors [42]

    W eak radiative decay To describe the weak radiative decay Y → B′ + γ, we take the covariant matrix element ˆMcov. = F1 Γµϕ∗ γ,µ + iF2σµνqµϕ∗ γ,ν + F3γµγ5ϕ∗ γ,µ, where F1, F2 and F3 are form factors [42]. In the rest frame of Y , the covariant matrix element reduces to ˆMWR ∝ ...

  6. [14]

    J. C. Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 396, 161 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9208213

    1993 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Airapetian et al

    A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES), Azimuthal single- and double-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep- inelastic lepton scattering by transversely polarized pro- tons, JHEP 12, 010, arXiv:2007.07755 [hep-ex]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Adolph et al

    C. Adolph et al. (COMPASS), Collins and Sivers asym- metries in muonproduction of pions and kaons off trans- versely polarised protons, Phys. Lett. B 744, 250 (2015), arXiv:1408.4405 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Seidl et al

    R. Seidl et al. (Belle), Measurement of Azimuthal Asym- metries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in e+e− Annihilation at √s = 10.58-GeV, Phys. Rev. D 78, 032011 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 039905 (2012)], arXiv:0805.2975 [hep-ex]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Li et al

    H. Li et al. (Belle), Azimuthal asymmetries of back-to- back π± − (π0, η, π±) pairs in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 100, 092008 (2019), arXiv:1909.01857 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar), Measurement of Collins asym- metries in inclusive production of charged pion pairs in e+e− annihilation at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 90, 052003 (2014), arXiv:1309.5278 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar), Collins asymmetries in inclusive charged KK and Kπ pairs produced in e+e− annihila- tion, Phys. Rev. D 92, 111101 (2015), arXiv:1506.05864 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive charged dipion production in e+e− annihilations at √s = 3.65 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042001 (2016), arXiv:1507.06824 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Anselmino, D

    M. Anselmino, D. Boer, U. D’Alesio, and F. Murgia, Lambda polarization from unpolarized quark fragmen- tation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054029 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0008186

    2001

  15. [23]

    Bianconi, S

    A. Bianconi, S. Boffi, R. Jakob, and M. Radici, Two hadron interference fragmentation functions. Part 1. General framework, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034008 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9907475

    2000 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Airapetian et al

    A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES), Effects of transversity in deep-inelastic scattering by polarized protons, Phys. Lett. B 693, 11 (2010), arXiv:1006.4221 [hep-ex]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Adolph et al

    C. Adolph et al. (COMPASS), A high-statistics measure- ment of transverse spin effects in dihadron production from muon–proton semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scatter- ing, Phys. Lett. B 736, 124 (2014), arXiv:1401.7873 [hep- ex]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Vossen et al

    A. Vossen et al. (Belle), Observation of transverse polar- ization asymmetries of charged pion pairs in e+e− an- nihilation near √s = 10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 072004 (2011), arXiv:1104.2425 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Anselmino, A

    M. Anselmino, A. Mukherjee, and A. Vossen, Transverse spin effects in hard semi-inclusive collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114, 103806 (2020), arXiv:2001.05415 [hep- ph]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. D. Panagiotou, Λ 0 Polarization in Hadron - Nucleon, Hadron - Nucleus and Nucleus-nucleus Interactions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5, 1197 (1990)

    1990

  21. [29]

    Airapetian et al

    A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES), Transverse polarization of Λ hyperons from quasireal photoproduction on nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 90, 072007 (2014), arXiv:1406.3236 [hep- ex]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The string+3P0 model is however restricted to the pro- duction of pseudoscalar (PS) mesons and vector mesons (VMs) in the final states but lacks the production of baryons

    via the StringSpinner package [31] and was shown to reproduce the Collins asymmetries and the dihadron production asymmetries in SIDIS [32] and the Collins asymmetries in e+e− [33, 34]. The string+3P0 model is however restricted to the pro- duction of pseudoscalar (PS) mesons ...

  23. [31]

    Guan et al

    Y. Guan et al. (Belle), Observation of Transverse Λ / ¯Λ Hyperon Polarization in e+e− Annihilation at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 042001 (2019), arXiv:1808.05000 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Felix, On Theoretical studies of Lambda0 polarization, Mod

    J. Felix, On Theoretical studies of Lambda0 polarization, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 827 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, and G. Ingelman, A Semi- classical Model for the Polarization of Inclusively Pro- duced Lambda 0 Particles at High-Energies, Phys. Lett. B 85, 417 (1979)

    1979

  26. [34]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjos- trand, Parton Fragmentation and String Dynamics, Phys. Rept. 97, 31 (1983)

    1983

  27. [35]

    P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman, The Complete tree level result up to order 1/Q for polarized deep inelas- tic leptoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 461, 197 (1996), [Er- ratum: Nucl.Phys.B 484, 538–540 (1997)], arXiv:hep- ph/9510301

    1996

  28. [36]

    D’Alesio, F

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, and M. Zaccheddu, First ex- traction of the Λ polarizing fragmentation function from Belle e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054001 (2020), arXiv:2003.01128 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Callos, Z.-B

    D. Callos, Z.-B. Kang, and J. Terry, Extracting the transverse momentum dependent polarizing fragmen- tation functions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 096007 (2020), arXiv:2003.04828 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    D’Alesio, L

    U. D’Alesio, L. Gamberg, F. Murgia, and M. Zaccheddu, Transverse Λ polarization in e+e− processes within a TMD factorization approach and the polarizing fragmen- tation function, JHEP 12, 074, arXiv:2209.11670 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kerbizi, X

    A. Kerbizi, X. Artru, Z. Belghobsi, F. Bradamante, and A. Martin, Recursive model for the fragmentation of polarized quarks, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074010 (2018), arXiv:1802.00962 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kerbizi, X

    A. Kerbizi, X. Artru, Z. Belghobsi, and A. Martin, Simplified recursive 3P0 model for the fragmentation of polarized quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014003 (2019), arXiv:1903.01736 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Kerbizi, X

    A. Kerbizi, X. Artru, and A. Martin, Production of vector mesons in the String+ 3P0 model of polarized quark fragmentation, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114038 (2021), arXiv:2109.06124 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Amati, A

    D. Amati, A. Stanghellini, and S. Fubini, Theory of high- energy scattering and multiple production, Nuovo Cim. 26, 896 (1962)

    1962

  35. [43]

    Bierlich et al

    C. Bierlich et al. , A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 8 (2022) 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kerbizi and L

    A. Kerbizi and L. L¨ onnblad, StringSpinner - adding spin to the PYTHIA string fragmentation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 272, 108234 (2022), arXiv:2105.09730 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kerbizi and L

    A. Kerbizi and L. L¨ onnblad, Extending StringSpinner to handle vector-meson spin, Comput. Phys. Commun.292, 17 108886 (2023), arXiv:2305.05058 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Kerbizi and X

    A. Kerbizi and X. Artru, String fragmentation of a quark pair with entangled spin states: Application to e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054029 (2024), arXiv:2312.14694 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kerbizi, L

    A. Kerbizi, L. L¨ onnblad, and A. Martin, Quark spin effects in e+e− annihilation: A Monte Carlo event generator study, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074029 (2024), arXiv:2407.07706 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, and T. Sjostrand, A Model for Baryon Production in Quark and Gluon Jets, Nucl. Phys. B 197, 45 (1982)

    1982

  41. [49]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, and B. Soderberg, A Gen- eral Model for Jet Fragmentation, Z. Phys. C 20, 317 (1983)

    1983

  42. [50]

    Casher, H

    A. Casher, H. Neuberger, and S. Nussinov, Chromoelec- tric Flux Tube Model of Particle Production, Phys. Rev. D 20, 179 (1979)

    1979

  43. [51]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Bacchetta, F. Conti, and M. Radici, Transverse- momentum distributions in a diquark spectator model, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074010 (2008), arXiv:0807.0323 [hep- ph]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Jakob, P

    R. Jakob, P. J. Mulders, and J. Rodrigues, Modeling quark distribution and fragmentation functions, Nucl. Phys. A 626, 937 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704335

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Artru, M

    X. Artru, M. Elchikh, J.-M. Richard, J. Soffer, and O. V. Teryaev, Spin observables and spin structure functions: inequalities and dynamics, Phys. Rept. 470, 1 (2009), arXiv:0802.0164 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    M. G. Alexeev et al. (COMPASS), Probing transversity by measuring Λ polarisation in SIDIS, Phys. Lett. B824, 136834 (2022), arXiv:2104.13585 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    J. C. Collins, Spin Correlations in Monte Carlo Event Generators, Nucl. Phys. B 304, 794 (1988)

    1988

  49. [57]

    I. G. Knowles, Spin Correlations in Parton - Parton Scat- tering, Nucl. Phys. B 310, 571 (1988)

    1988

  50. [58]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, and T. Sjostrand, Baryon Production in Jet Fragmentation and Υ Decay, Phys. Scripta 32, 574 (1985)

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.