Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Cosmological phase transitions without high-temperature expansions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A hard-soft split of the resummed 4d thermal effective potential, evaluated with finite-temperature Loop-Tree Duality, yields full-mass two-loop and three-loop phase-transition thermodynamics without high-temperature expansions.

desk verdict A genuine two-loop no-high-T effective potential with a promising but incomplete three-loop extension; the δL=0 truncation is the main thing to test. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07014 v1 pith:BDILBIQN submitted 2025-07-09 hep-ph

Pablo Navarrete , Risto Paatelainen , Kaapo Seppänen , Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords cosmologicalphasetransitionsthermaleffectivepotentialhigh-temperatureexpansiondimensionalreductionloop-treedualitysum-integralsscalar-Yukawamodelgravitationalwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that cosmological phase-transition thermodynamics can be computed perturbatively to high loop orders without the standard high-temperature expansion. The key step is an exact reorganization of the resummed four-dimensional thermal effective potential into a naively computed hard part and a resummed soft part, V_res = (V_naive − V_naive,soft) + V_res,soft, with all masses kept exact. The hard part is evaluated numerically using a finite-temperature generalization of Loop-Tree Duality, while the soft part comes from a three-dimensional effective theory with fully massive matching. As proof of principle, the authors present a complete two-loop effective potential and a three-loop extension—the first fully massive three-loop thermal sum-integral computation without high-temperature expansions—for a scalar-Yukawa model. If correct, this removes a key obstacle to reliable predictions for strong first-order phase transitions, where high-temperature approximations break down.

What carries the argument

The central object is the splitting identity V_res = (V_naive − V_naive,soft) + V_res,soft (Eq. 2), together with the 'hotLTD' algorithm that evaluates the hard combination ΔV_hard = V_naive − V_naive,soft. The splitting isolates the physics of hard modes (momenta of order πT) from soft static zero modes; the soft part is computed in a 3d effective theory with parameters matched to the full theory at fully massive one-loop order, while the hard part is evaluated by analytic Matsubara summation, local UV subtraction via Bogoliubov's R-operation, and Monte Carlo integration of the remaining 3d momentum integrals. The matching corrections $δM_3^{2}$ and δG_3 enter as IR counterterms that cancel the soft singularities of the naive sum-integrals locally at the integrand level.

What would settle it

Compute the scalar-Yukawa model at the benchmark point of Eq. (31) with y ≈ 0.9 using a full 4d lattice Monte Carlo simulation and compare T_c and latent heat with the paper's full one- and two-loop results; a disagreement well outside the quoted renormalization-scale band would refute the claim of full-mass-range validity. Alternatively, add the leading higher-dimensional operator in the 3d EFT and check whether its effect at strong transitions is suppressed relative to the super-renormalizable terms.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the identity V_res = (V_naive − V_naive,soft) + V_res,soft gives a valid order-by-order reorganization of the resummed 4d thermal effective potential across all mass regimes. V_naive is the ordinary unresummed loop expansion in the full theory; V_res,soft resums the static soft zero modes within dimensional reduction, with matching parameters computed without high-temperature expansions; V_naive,soft is the expansion of that soft expression in the matching corrections, acting as local thermal counterterms that cancel infrared divergences in V_naive at the integrand level. In the scalar-Yukawa model this yields a complete two-loop resummed potential and a three-loop contribution from a Mercedes-type diagram with a fermion loop, stated as the first fully massive three-loop sum-integral evaluation without high-temperature expansions. The paper further claims that the resulting full one- and two-loop thermodynamics remain under control at large Yukawa couplings, giving significantly stronger transitions than the high-temperature 3d EFT and avoiding its breakdown near y ≈ 0.97.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme assumes that once all masses are kept exact, the infinite tower of higher-dimensional operators in the 3d effective theory is suppressed at the perturbative order considered, so that truncating the EFT at super-renormalizable order (δL = 0) misses nothing at that order in the strong-transition regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For strong first-order transitions in the scalar-Yukawa benchmark, the full one- and two-loop results predict smaller critical temperatures and larger latent heat than the high-temperature 3d EFT, and they remain well-behaved at Yukawa couplings where the 3d EFT (at NLO in the high-T expansion) ceases to have a transition.
  • Because the UV and IR subtractions are performed locally at the integrand level, the framework is automatable and extends beyond two loops, as shown by the three-loop Mercedes example.
  • The same hard-soft split applies in gauge-Higgs theories, where the high-temperature expansion for the transition-inducing fields generically breaks down in strong first-order transitions, so the framework can be used to scrutinize current 3d EFT and lattice predictions.
  • The resummed soft part in the small-mass regime reduces to the standard daisy resummation, but with the thermal mass computed without high-temperature expansions, giving a consistent resummation at higher orders.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the framework's predictions survive comparison with full 4d lattice simulations, the standard no-go result that single-step electroweak transitions cannot produce LISA-visible gravitational waves would need to be revisited, since that bound was derived within the high-temperature 3d EFT.
  • Beyond the paper: the same integrand-level hard-soft decomposition could be applied to the effective action and bubble nucleation rate, where the high-temperature expansion is also questionable for strong transitions; the paper lists this as future work but gives no demonstration.
  • Beyond the paper: a direct test of the paper's claim about imaginary parts is to compute the bubble profile and nucleation rate in the tachyonic region and verify that the imaginary component of the potential does not alter the physical decay rate; the paper only checks the minima in its own numerical examples.
  • Beyond the paper: combining the full-mass potential with a field-dependent renormalization scale (which the paper does not implement) would extend the benchmark to physically stable zero-temperature vacuum at large y and could change the quantitative predictions for strong transitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new framework for computing the equilibrium thermal effective potential without recourse to the high-temperature expansion. The organizing identity is Eq. (2), which rewrites the resummed potential as a naive hard contribution minus a naive soft contribution plus a resummed soft contribution. The hard contribution is evaluated with a finite-temperature generalization of Loop-Tree Duality (hotLTD), while the soft contribution is generated from a dimensionally-reduced 3d effective theory. As a proof of principle in a scalar-Yukawa model, the paper presents a complete one- and two-loop calculation (Eqs. (21) and (23)), a partially completed three-loop example involving the Mercedes-type sum-integral (Eqs. (24)-(30)), and numerical results for Tc and latent heat in Fig. 3. The central claims are that the framework works across all mass regimes, that the two-loop result is complete, and that the three-loop example represents the first fully massive three-loop sum-integral computation without high-temperature expansions.

Significance. If the framework is correct, it would be a substantial advance for strong first-order phase transitions, where field-dependent masses can be of order pi*T and the high-T expansion is unreliable. The paper's strengths include an explicit and plausible two-loop construction, local cancellation of IR divergences at the integrand level, use of the R-operation for UV subtraction, and public numerical data for the thermal functions in Zenodo. The two-loop thermal functions bT and fT are also cross-checked against Ref. [76], which is an important independent validation. The broader conceptual claim that Eq. (2) plus hotLTD can systematically push order-by-order is attractive and worth developing. However, the load-bearing assumption that the 3d EFT can be truncated at super-renormalizable order (delta L = 0) is asserted without proof or test, and the three-loop result is only partial, so the strongest claims in the abstract and Section V must be qualified or defended.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (13)] The statement that with fully massive sum-integrals 'the impact of higher-dimensional operators naturally aligns with the coupling expansion' and that it suffices to set delta L = 0 is a load-bearing assumption, but it is not proved or tested. In the strong-transition regime where M_psi ~ y*phi ~ pi*T, a dimension-6 operator such as a fermion-induced phi^6/(pi*T)^2 correction is not obviously suppressed relative to the retained G3*phi^3/3! and lambda3*phi^4/4! terms. Since V_res,soft and V_naive,soft are both constructed from this truncated EFT, the IR counterterms subtracted from Delta V_hard inherit the truncation. If higher-dimensional operators contribute at the same order, Eq. (2) with Eq. (13) is not exact over the claimed full mass range, and the large-y results in Fig. 3 rest on an unverified premise. The authors should provide an explicit power-counting estimate of the leading higher-dimensional operator, or include the first such operator in the three-loop counterterm calculation and demonstrate that its effects are numerically negligible in the benchmark of Eq. (31).
  2. [Sec. V, Eq. (30)] The three-loop result is presented as a 'novel three-loop extension' and as the 'first fully massive three-loop sum-integral computation', but Eq. (30) is not a complete three-loop contribution. The text explicitly states that determining the constant piece of d_UV requires two-loop thermal contributions to linear order in epsilon and is 'a formidable task lying beyond the scope of this work,' and that the remaining renormalized thermal contributions are to be determined later. Thus, only the finite thermal function d_T is actually computed, while d_UV is left undetermined. The paper should clearly state in the abstract and in Section V that the three-loop calculation is partial: it demonstrates the viability of the hotLTD machinery on one non-trivial topology, but it does not yet provide a fully renormalized three-loop effective potential.
  3. [Sec. II and Appendix C] The numerical evaluation of the three-loop thermal function d_T in Eq. (30) relies entirely on the hotLTD algorithm, which is described only in an in-preparation reference [99], and the paper's Appendix C works out a two-loop sunset example rather than the three-loop diagram. Consequently, the flagship three-loop numerical result has no fully independent verification: the agreement with Ref. [76] covers only the two-loop functions b_T and f_T, not the three-loop d_T. The authors should either release the hotLTD implementation, provide a detailed three-loop subtraction and Matsubara-summation description for the Mercedes diagram, or give an independent numerical cross-check for d_T before the claim of a completed three-loop computation is made.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V] The text states that there are 29 distinct three-loop sum-integrals, of which 15 are non-factorized, but only the single Mercedes-type integral M is evaluated. The paper should explicitly state that the other 14 non-factorized three-loop structures are not computed in this work, so that readers do not infer a complete three-loop effective potential.
  2. [Eq. (21)] The notation h(q_phi) - (1/2) h(2 q_psi) + 4 h(q_psi) would benefit from an explicit definition of the argument scaling for the fermionic function; the current text explains the rescaling verbally but the reader must reconstruct the exact relation from the h defined in Eq. (A5).
  3. [Fig. 3] The caption says that the bands depict renormalization-scale variation, but the text in Section VI explains that the range is Lambda in [0.5 pi T_c^LO, 2 pi T_c^LO]. It would be clearer to state the range directly in the caption.
  4. [References [99] and [126]] The hotLTD algorithm is cited as an in-preparation paper, and the Zenodo data [126] is from the same group. Please provide a stable DOI or version identifier for the data and, if possible, a preprint number for [99], so that the numerical claims can be verified independently.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

No derivation step reduces to its inputs: Tc and L are computed from fixed inputs and Eq. (2) is an exact reordering with independently matched EFT parameters.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section V, Eq. (30) and Fig. 2; method introduced in Section II and used in Sections IV-V; refs [99] and [126]]
    "Using hotLTD, we determine this function with high numerical accuracy across a wide range of masses, spanning from vanishing values up to heavy masses of order 4πT (i.e., qϕ,ψ ∼ 4π) [126]."

    The load-bearing numerical evidence for the headline claim — the 'first fully massive three-loop sum-integral computation' — is the function dT in Eq. (30), determined 'via the hotLTD technique [126]'. Reference [126] is a Zenodo deposit authored by all four present authors, and hotLTD itself is justified by [99], an unpublished manuscript ('arXiv:In preparation') overlapping three of the four present authors. No independent description of hotLTD or the dT data is cited, so the central three-loop result rests on a self-citation chain. This is not a parameter fit: Tc and L are solved from fixed inputs, and bT, fT remain cross-checkable against external Ref. [76].

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Eq. (2) is an exact add-and-subtract identity; V_naive,soft is defined as the diagrammatic expansion of V_res,soft in powers of δX3 (Section III, Eqs. (16)-(17)), so ΔV_hard is IR-safe by construction and V_res,soft is anchored to 3d EFT parameters matched from full 4d correlators (Appendix B) without high-T expansions. No predicted quantity is fitted: Tc and L(Tc) in Fig. 3 are solved from the renormalized potential (Eqs. (21), (23)) at the fixed inputs of Eq. (31), taken from Ref. [58]. The self-definitional and fitted-input patterns therefore do not arise. Flagged items that I weigh in the verdict but do not count as circular steps. (i) δL=0 truncation (Section III, Eq. (13)): 'the impact of higher-dimensional operators naturally aligns with the coupling expansion' is asserted without proof or check in the strong-transition regime Mψ ∼ yφ ∼ πT — the very regime where the Introduction cites O(1) higher-operator effects (Refs. [58,59,74,75]). This is the weakest unverified premise and a correctness risk to the full-mass-range claim, not a circularity. (ii) Three-loop completeness (Section V, Eq. (30)): the constant piece of dUV is explicitly postponed ('a formidable task lying beyond the scope of this work'), so the three-loop example demonstrates the IR-cancellation mechanism but does not deliver the complete renormalized three-loop potential. (iii) Scale convention (Section VI): Λ0 = πT_c^LO is stated to be 'not motivated by physical considerations' and is bracketed by a scale-variation band; it is a comparison choice, not a fit. The single load-bearing self-reference: the numerical thermal functions bT, fT, dT are 'evaluated numerically via the hotLTD technique [126]', with [126] a Zenodo deposit by this paper's four authors and [99] the same group's 'arXiv:In preparation' description (three of four authors in common). That is a verification gap, not a reduction: the functions are computed, not fitted, and bT, fT are cross-checkable against external Ref. [76]; however the headline three-loop claim rests on this self-citation chain. Score 4: some self-citation in the load-bearing numerics, central derivation still independently grounded.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard thermal field theory plus the algorithmic hotLTD procedure, whose canonical reference is an in-preparation preprint by the same group. No parameters are fitted to data; benchmark values in Eq. (31) are model inputs. The delta L = 0 EFT truncation is the most paper-specific assumption. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Perturbative power counting g^2/m_phi^2 ~ y^2 ~ lambda, sigma/T^2 ~ g, m^2/T^2 ~ lambda (Ref. [117]).
    Sets which couplings count as one-loop order; adopted at the start of Section III and inherited from the cited Yukawa-model study.
  • domain assumption Hard modes (momenta of order pi T) can be treated by ordinary unresummed perturbation theory, while only static zero modes require resummation.
    This is the physical basis for Eq. (2) and for dimensional reduction; standard in thermal field theory but an assumption about the scale hierarchy.
  • ad hoc to paper The 3d EFT can be truncated to super-renormalizable operators, delta L = 0, when massive sum-integrals are retained.
    Asserted in Section III after Eq. (13); no derivation is given for suppression of higher-dimensional operators outside the high-temperature expansion.
  • standard math Dimensional regularization in d = 3 - 2 epsilon spatial dimensions with the MS scheme and the supplied counterterms removes all ultraviolet poles.
    Used throughout Appendices A-D; relies on standard renormalization theory, including Bogoliubov's R-operation.
  • ad hoc to paper The hotLTD algorithm described in Appendix C and in the in-preparation reference [99] correctly performs Matsubara summation, ultraviolet subtraction, and yields finite Monte Carlo integrands at three loops.
    The two-loop sunset example is explicit, but the three-loop automation rests on an unpublished same-author reference; no formal proof or public code is provided.
  • standard math The vacuum two-loop sunrise master integrals from Ref. [146] and the 3d sunset integral in Eq. (A17) are correct.
    Taken from established literature for the 4d sunrise; the 3d sunset is a known result.
  • domain assumption The tachyonic-mass extension, taking real parts and absolute values of squared masses in vacuum functions, does not affect the physical minima.
    Argued in Section III and Appendix A; standard in effective-potential practice but not rigorously proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological phase transitions without high-temperature expansions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BDILBIQN

@misc{pith2026250707014,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological phase transitions without high-temperature expansions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BDILBIQN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07014}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a new framework for perturbatively computing equilibrium thermodynamic properties of cosmological phase transitions to high loop orders, using the full four-dimensional resummed thermal effective potential and avoiding the limitations of standard high-temperature approximations. By systematically disentangling the physics of hard and soft momentum scales, our approach unifies their treatment within a single expression, enabling consistent handling of both vacuum and thermal divergences across all mass regimes. This core innovation enables the efficient numerical evaluation of massive multiloop thermal sum-integrals, achieved through a finite-temperature generalization of Loop-Tree Duality -- an advanced algorithmic technique originally developed to render vacuum Feynman integrals numerically tractable via Monte Carlo methods. As a proof of principle, we apply the framework to a scalar-Yukawa model, presenting a complete two-loop calculation and a novel three-loop extension -- the first fully massive three-loop sum-integral computation without relying on high-temperature expansions. Our approach opens the door to precise perturbative predictions of the phase structure in a broad class of beyond-the-Standard-Model scenarios, including those featuring strong first-order phase transitions relevant for gravitational-wave signals, where conventional high-temperature approximations break down.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07014 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Infrared structure of the three-loop Mercedes dia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Three-loop thermal function defined in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Critical temperature (left) and latent heat (right) as function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hot news on the phase structure of the SMEFT

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A full O(g^4) dimensional reduction of the dimension-six SMEFT shows that the top-Higgs operator O_tphi can trigger a first-order electroweak phase transition with zero (phi-dagger phi)^3 coupling at zero temperature.

  2. Hard thermal contributions to phase transition observables at NNLO

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three-loop thermal masses and two-loop quartic couplings complete the O(g^6) high-temperature EFT of U(1) and SU(N) gauge-Higgs models, with a missing contribution identified in a known three-loop master integral.

  3. Beyond the Daisy Chain: Running and the 3D EFT View of Supercooled Phase Transitions

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    With renormalisation-group running included, the one-loop high-temperature Daisy-resummed potential at µ=πT reproduces the phase-transition parameters of the two-loop dimensionally reduced EFT, while the no-running on...

  4. Testing the effective action approach to bubble nucleation in holography

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-derivative holographic effective action reproduces critical bubble solutions from the full gravity theory to within a few percent across thin-wall and thick-wall regimes.

  5. Revisiting Singlet Fermion Dark Matter with a Scalar Portal: Connecting Higgs Phenomenology and Strong Electroweak Phase Transition

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a no-VEV singlet scalar + singlet fermion dark matter extension of the SM, a strong first-order electroweak phase transition, the observed dark matter relic density, and collider/direct-detection constraints can co...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [76]

    Gould, J

    O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 100, 115024 (2019), arXiv:1903.11604 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [99]

    A renormalization group improvement for thermally resummed effective potential

    K. Funakubo and E. Senaha, Renormalization group im- provement for thermally resummed effective potential, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071901 (2024), arXiv:2307.02153 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Generate all Feynman diagrams contributing to V naive eff in the full theory, and cast the resulting sum- integrals into a standarized propagator basis – for example, using the canonicalization procedure out- lined in Ref. [132])

  4. [2]

    Repeat the procedure for V res,soft eff and the effective parameters X3 using the appropriate 3d effective theory describing the soft physics

  5. [3]

    By writing X3 = X + δX3, generate the IR coun- terterms in V naive,soft eff by expanding in δX3 to the corresponding order in the 4d-theory couplings

  6. [4]

    one-loop

    To construct ∆ V hard eff , the resulting expressions are matched at the integrand level to IR-sensitive sum-integrals – for instance, by employing pattern matching techniques [121]. Together with the systematic subtraction of UV diver- gences via the R-operation, every conceivable contribu- tion to the hard effective potential ∆ V hard eff can be cast in...

  7. [5]

    , (A14) where R = P − Q. Upon a suitable subtraction of diver- gences as described in Appendix C, these sum-integrals can be cast in the form S(m) = Svac(m) + S3d(m) − 1 (4π)2 T 2 1 4ε + 1 2 + ln Λ3d 6πT − 3I T (m, T) 1 ε + 2 ln Λ 2πT + T 2bT (q) + O(ε), eS(m1, m2) = Svac(m1, m2) + 1 (4π)2 h 2eI T (m1, T) + I T (m2, T) i 1 ε + 2 ln Λ 2πT + T 2fT (q1, q2) ...

  8. [6]

    − 19 + z2 8wLi2 1 − z2 2 (1 + w) + 2w ln2 −1 + z2 2 (1 + w) + 2π2 3 w +3 ln2(x2

Show all 163 references
  1. [7]

    − 7 − z4 2wLi2 1 − z2 2 (1 + w) + w 2 ln2 −1 + z2 2 (1 + w) + π2 6 w + 1 2 ln2(x2

  2. [8]

    (A18) Here, we define z2 ≡ x2 1/x2 2 and w ≡ √ 1 − 4z−2, while ψ1(x) = d2/dx2 ln Γ(x) is the trigamma function and Li2(x) is the dilogarithm [147]

    − 5 2 . (A18) Here, we define z2 ≡ x2 1/x2 2 and w ≡ √ 1 − 4z−2, while ψ1(x) = d2/dx2 ln Γ(x) is the trigamma function and Li2(x) is the dilogarithm [147]. Note that, although the fermionic function F involves complex terms for z2 > 0, it is a real function. Furthermore, as an...

  3. [9]

    (B1) Owing to ∆Π hard R capturing hard-scale effects only, it is well defined in the infrared and can hence be expanded in soft momenta k2 ≲ λT 2 up to O(λ2T 2)

    Effective mass parameter After enough resummations, the (inverse) renormal- ized static two-point function for the scalar field in the full theory can be written as k2 + M 2 ϕ(φ) + ∆Πhard R (k2) + Πsoft,res R (k2). (B1) Owing to ∆Π hard R capturing hard-scale effects only, it ...

  4. [10]

    Γ(3) 4d (p0 i = 0, pi → 0) = Γ(3) 3d (p0 i = 0, pi → 0), (B6) where Γ(3) 4d (p0 i = 0, pi → 0) = G + (4d loops), (B7) Γ(3) 3d (p0 i = 0, pi → 0) = G3 + (3d loops)

    Effective cubic coupling Expressing the effective cubic coupling as G3 = G + δG3, the one-loop correction to δG3 can be obtained upon matching (renormalized) scalar three-point func- tions Γ (3)(p0 i , pi) at vanishing external momenta in the static limit, i.e. Γ(3) 4d (p0 i =...

  5. [11]

    (E11) arises from a numerical integration that results from the three-loop calculation of the effective potential [119]

    in Eq. (E11) arises from a numerical integration that results from the three-loop calculation of the effective potential [119]. When y ∈ [0.3, 1.0], the expansion parameter α3 ∈ [0.8, 0.05] decreases with increasing y. As a result, the strict expansion of Eq. (E11) converges r...

  6. [12]

    Moreover, since the one-loop contribution at O(α3) is independent of the thermal mass, there is no logarithmic dependence on the 3d scale at three-loop order in the O(α3

    term. Moreover, since the one-loop contribution at O(α3) is independent of the thermal mass, there is no logarithmic dependence on the 3d scale at three-loop order in the O(α3

  7. [13]

    term. Appendix F: A brief excursion into Higgs portal models In this Appendix, we further motivate why it is impor- tant to extend our newly developed framework to strong transitions in many BSM theories — that is, why we can anticipate a breakdown of the high- T expansion for...

  8. [14]

    A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymme- try, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967)

    1967

  9. [15]

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Non- conservation in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 155, 36 (1985)

    1985

  10. [16]

    D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Elec- troweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14, 125003 (2012), arXiv:1206.2942 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Bodeker and W

    D. Bodeker and W. Buchmuller, Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035004 (2021), arXiv:2009.07294 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [18]

    C. J. Hogan, Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 218, 629 (1986)

    1986

  13. [19]

    M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The electroweak phase transition: a collider target, JHEP 09, 179, arXiv:1912.07189 [hep- ph]

    1912 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interfer- ometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interfer- ometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmologi- cal phase transitions, JCAP 04, 001, arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  15. [21]

    Caprini et al

    C. Caprini et al. , Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03, 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    1910 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Auclair et al

    P. Auclair et al. (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space An- tenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 5 (2023), arXiv:2204.05434 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Amaro-Seoane and et

    P. Amaro-Seoane and et. al., Laser interferometer space antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [24]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3546 (1993), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 50, 6662 (1994)], arXiv:hep-ph/9212235

    1993 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Farakos, K

    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, 3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: Perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 425, 67 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9404201

    1994 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Braaten and A

    E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Effective field theory approach to high temperature thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6990 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9501375

    1995 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory, Vol. 925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Luscher, Chiral gauge theories revisited, Subnucl

    M. Luscher, Chiral gauge theories revisited, Subnucl. Ser. 38, 41 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0102028

    2002 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry behavior at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3320 (1974)

    1974

  24. [30]

    Weinberg, Gauge and global symmetries at high tem- perature, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Gauge and global symmetries at high tem- perature, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3357 (1974)

    1974

  25. [31]

    Laine and M

    M. Laine and M. Losada, Two loop dimensional re- duction and effective potential without temperature ex- pansions, Nucl. Phys. B 582, 277 (2000), arXiv:hep- ph/0003111

    2000

  26. [32]

    J. O. Andersen and M. Strickland, Resummation in hot field theories, Annals Phys. 317, 281 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0404164

    2005

  27. [33]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Generic rules for high temperature di- mensional reduction and their application to the stan- dard model, Nucl. Phys. B 458, 90 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9508379

    1996

  28. [34]

    P. H. Ginsparg, First Order and Second Order Phase Transitions in Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 170, 388 (1980)

    1980

  29. [35]

    Appelquist and R

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, High-Temperature 25 Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2305 (1981)

    1981

  30. [36]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and Y. Schroder, The Pressure of hot QCD up to g6 ln(1/g), Phys. Rev. D 67, 105008 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0211321

    2003 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and Y. Schroder, How to resum long distance contributions to the QCD pressure?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 10 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0007109

    2001 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Vuorinen, Cool quark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 042501 (2016), arXiv:1603.00750 [hep- ph]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 466, 189 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9510020

    1996 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Is there a hot electroweak phase transi- tion at mH ≳ mW ?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2887 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9605288

    1996 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Farakos, K

    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, 3-d physics and the electroweak phase transition: A Framework for lattice Monte Carlo analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 442, 317 (1995), arXiv:hep- lat/9412091

    1995

  36. [42]

    Bodeker, P

    D. Bodeker, P. John, M. Laine, and M. G. Schmidt, The Two loop MSSM finite temperature effective potential with stop condensation, Nucl. Phys. B 497, 387 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9612364

    1997 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Losada, High temperature dimensional reduction of the MSSM and other multiscalar models, Phys

    M. Losada, High temperature dimensional reduction of the MSSM and other multiscalar models, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2893 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9605266

    1997 arXiv

  38. [44]

    J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Supersymmetric elec- troweak phase transition: Beyond perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 482, 73 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9605235

    1996 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Laine, Effective theories of MSSM at high tem- perature, Nucl

    M. Laine, Effective theories of MSSM at high tem- perature, Nucl. Phys. B 481, 43 (1996), [Erra- tum: Nucl.Phys.B 548, 637–638 (1999)], arXiv:hep- ph/9605283

    1996

  40. [46]

    J. O. Andersen, Dimensional reduction of the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature, Eur. Phys. J. C 11, 563 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9804280

    1999 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Laine and K

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, Higgs sector CP viola- tion at the electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 545, 141 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9811369

    1999 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Laine and K

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, Two Higgs doublet dy- namics at the electroweak phase transition: A Non- perturbative study, Nucl. Phys. B 597, 23 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0009025

    2001 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Gynther and M

    A. Gynther and M. Vepsalainen, Pressure of the stan- dard model near the electroweak phase transition, JHEP 03, 011, arXiv:hep-ph/0512177

    arXiv

  44. [50]

    Gynther and M

    A. Gynther and M. Vepsalainen, Pressure of the stan- dard model at high temperatures, JHEP 01, 060, arXiv:hep-ph/0510375

    arXiv

  45. [51]

    Brauner, T

    T. Brauner, T. V. I. Tenkanen, A. Tranberg, A. Vuori- nen, and D. J. Weir, Dimensional reduction of the Stan- dard Model coupled to a new singlet scalar field, JHEP 03, 007, arXiv:1609.06230 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [52]

    J. O. Andersen, T. Gorda, A. Helset, L. Niemi, T. V. I. Tenkanen, A. Tranberg, A. Vuorinen, and D. J. Weir, Nonperturbative Analysis of the Electroweak Phase Transition in the Two Higgs Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 191802 (2018), arXiv:1711.09849 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Gorda, A

    T. Gorda, A. Helset, L. Niemi, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Three-dimensional effective theories for the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature, JHEP 02, 081, arXiv:1802.05056 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [54]

    Niemi, H

    L. Niemi, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Electroweak phase transi- tion in the real triplet extension of the SM: Dimen- sional reduction, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035002 (2019), arXiv:1802.10500 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [55]

    P. M. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. ¨Osterman, Robust approach to thermal resummation: Standard Model meets a singlet, JHEP 06, 130, arXiv:2102.11145 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  50. [56]

    Schicho, T

    P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and G. White, Combining thermal resummation and gauge invari- ance for electroweak phase transition, JHEP 11, 047, arXiv:2203.04284 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  51. [57]

    Ekstedt, P

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for ther- mal phase transitions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 288, 108725 (2023), arXiv:2205.08815 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [58]

    T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. van de Vis, Speed of sound in cosmological phase transitions and effect on gravita- tional waves, JHEP 08, 302, arXiv:2206.01130 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  53. [59]

    Biondini, P

    S. Biondini, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Strong electroweak phase transition in t-channel simplified dark matter models, JCAP 10, 044, arXiv:2207.12207 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

  54. [60]

    Laine, Exact relation of lattice and continuum pa- rameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories, Nucl

    M. Laine, Exact relation of lattice and continuum pa- rameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories, Nucl. Phys. B 451, 484 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9504001

    1995 arXiv

  55. [61]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Rajantie, Lattice continuum relations for 3-D SU(N) + Higgs theories, Nucl. Phys. B 513, 471 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9705003

    1998 arXiv

  56. [62]

    Niemi, M

    L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Xia, Nonper- turbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 115016 (2024), arXiv:2405.01191 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Gould and P

    O. Gould and P. M. Saffin, Perturbative gravitational wave predictions for the real-scalar extended Standard Model, JHEP 03, 105, arXiv:2411.08951 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  58. [64]

    Croon, O

    D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenka- nen, and G. White, Theoretical uncertainties for cos- mological first-order phase transitions, JHEP 04, 055, arXiv:2009.10080 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Gould and T

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen, On the pertur- bative expansion at high temperature and implica- tions for cosmological phase transitions, JHEP 06, 069, arXiv:2104.04399 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  60. [66]

    Gould and J

    O. Gould and J. Hirvonen, Effective field theory ap- proach to thermal bubble nucleation, Phys. Rev. D104, 096015 (2021), arXiv:2108.04377 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [67]

    L. S. Friedrich, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenka- nen, and V. Q. Tran, Addressing the Gravitational Wave - Collider Inverse Problem, arXiv:2203.05889 [hep-ph] (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Kierkla, B

    M. Kierkla, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. van de Vis, Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimensional transmutation meets di- mensional reduction, JHEP 02, 234, arXiv:2312.12413 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  63. [69]

    Lewicki, M

    M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, L. Sagunski, P. Schicho, and D. Schmitt, Impact of theoretical uncertainties 26 on model parameter reconstruction from GW signals sourced by cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023538 (2024), arXiv:2403.03769 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [70]

    M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and V. Q. Tran, Refining Gravitational Wave and Collider Physics Dialogue via Singlet Scalar Extension, arXiv:2409.17554 [hep-ph] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Chala, J

    M. Chala, J. C. Criado, L. Gil, and J. L. Miras, Higher-order-operator corrections to phase-transition parameters in dimensional reduction, JHEP 10, 025, arXiv:2406.02667 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  66. [72]

    Chala and G

    M. Chala and G. Guedes, The High-Temperature Limit of the SM(EFT), arXiv:2503.20016 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Kierkla, P

    M. Kierkla, P. Schicho, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenka- nen, and J. van de Vis, Finite-temperature bubble nucle- ation with shifting scale hierarchies, arXiv:2503.13597 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  68. [74]

    G. D. Moore and K. Rummukainen, Electroweak bubble nucleation, nonperturbatively, Phys. Rev. D 63, 045002 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009132

    2001 arXiv

  69. [75]

    G. D. Moore, K. Rummukainen, and A. Tranberg, Nonperturbative computation of the bubble nucleation rate in the cubic anisotropy model, JHEP 04, 017, arXiv:hep-lat/0103036

    arXiv

  70. [77]

    Gould, S

    O. Gould, S. G¨ uyer, and K. Rummukainen, First-order electroweak phase transitions: A nonperturbative up- date, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114507 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 119903 (2024)], arXiv:2205.07238 [hep- lat]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Gould, A

    O. Gould, A. Kormu, and D. J. Weir, A nonperturbative test of nucleation calculations for strong phase transi- tions, arXiv:2404.01876 [hep-th] (2024)

    2024

  72. [79]

    H¨ allfors and K

    J. H¨ allfors and K. Rummukainen, Expanded ensemble method for bubble nucleation, arXiv:2502.14610 [hep- lat] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Gould and T

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Perturbative effective field theory expansions for cosmological phase transi- tions, JHEP 01, 048, arXiv:2309.01672 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  74. [81]

    Ekstedt, O

    A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, and J. L¨ ofgren, Radiative first- order phase transitions to next-to-next-to-leading or- der, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036012 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 019901 (2024)], arXiv:2205.07241 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Ekstedt, P

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Cosmo- logical phase transitions at three loops: The final ver- dict on perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 096006 (2024), arXiv:2405.18349 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Linde, Infrared problem in the thermodynamics of the yang-mills gas, Physics Letters B 96, 289 (1980)

    A. Linde, Infrared problem in the thermodynamics of the yang-mills gas, Physics Letters B 96, 289 (1980)

    1980

  77. [84]

    Braaten, Solution to the perturbative infrared catas- trophe of hot gauge theories, Phys

    E. Braaten, Solution to the perturbative infrared catas- trophe of hot gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2164 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9409434

    1995 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Kainulainen, V

    K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and V. Vaskonen, On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transi- tion in the Two Higgs Doublet model, JHEP 06, 075, arXiv:1904.01329 [hep-ph]

    1904 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Gould, Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturba- tive analysis, JHEP 04, 057, arXiv:2101.05528 [hep-ph]

    O. Gould, Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturba- tive analysis, JHEP 04, 057, arXiv:2101.05528 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  80. [87]

    Bernardo, P

    F. Bernardo, P. Klose, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenka- nen, Higher-dimensional operators at finite-temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions, arXiv:2503.18904 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Chala, L

    M. Chala, L. Gil, and Z. Ren, Phase Transi- tions in Dimensional Reduction up to Three Loops, arXiv:2505.14335 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Laine, M

    M. Laine, M. Meyer, and G. Nardini, Thermal phase transition with full 2-loop effective potential, Nucl. Phys. B 920, 565 (2017), arXiv:1702.07479 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  83. [90]

    R. R. Parwani, Resummation in a hot scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4695 (1992), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 48, 5965 (1993)], arXiv:hep-ph/9204216

    1992 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Karsch, A

    F. Karsch, A. Patkos, and P. Petreczky, Screened perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 401, 69 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9702376

    1997 arXiv

  85. [92]

    C. G. Boyd, D. E. Brahm, and S. D. H. Hsu, Resumma- tion methods at finite temperature: The Tadpole way, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4963 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9304254

    1993 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Chiku and T

    S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda, Optimized perturbation the- ory at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 58, 076001 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9803226

    1998 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Chiku, Optimized perturbation theory at finite tem- perature: Two loop analysis, Prog

    S. Chiku, Optimized perturbation theory at finite tem- perature: Two loop analysis, Prog. Theor. Phys. 104, 1129 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0012322

    2000 arXiv

  88. [95]

    J. L. Kneur and M. B. Pinto, Scale Invariant Resummed Perturbation at Finite Temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 031601 (2016), arXiv:1507.03508 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Funakubo and E

    K. Funakubo and E. Senaha, Two-loop effective poten- tial, thermal resummation, and first-order phase tran- sitions: Beyond the high-temperature expansion, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054003 (2013), arXiv:1210.1737 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Curtin, P

    D. Curtin, P. Meade, and H. Ramani, Thermal Resum- mation and Phase Transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 787 (2018), arXiv:1612.00466 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Curtin, J

    D. Curtin, J. Roy, and G. White, Gravitational waves and tadpole resummation: Efficient and easy conver- gence of finite temperature QFT, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116001 (2024), arXiv:2211.08218 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Funakubo and E

    K. Funakubo and E. Senaha, Refined renormaliza- tion group improvement for thermally resummed ef- fective potential, Phys. Rev. D 109, 056023 (2024), arXiv:2308.15876 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    H. Bahl, M. Carena, A. Ireland, and C. E. M. Wagner, Improved thermal resummation for multi-field poten- tials, JHEP 09, 153, arXiv:2404.12439 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    Bittar, S

    P. Bittar, S. Roy, and C. E. M. Wagner, Self Consis- tent Thermal Resummation: A Case Study of the Phase Transition in 2HDM, arXiv:2504.02024 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  95. [103]

    Banerjee and S

    N. Banerjee and S. Mallik, Critical temperature in a Higgs scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3368 (1991)

    1991

  96. [104]

    Boyanovsky, D

    D. Boyanovsky, D. Brahm, R. Holman, and D. S. Lee, The Gauge invariant effective potential: Equilibrium and nonequilibrium aspects, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1763 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9603337

    1996 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Amelino-Camelia, Thermal effective potential of the O(N) linear sigma model, Phys

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Thermal effective potential of the O(N) linear sigma model, Phys. Lett. B407, 268 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9702403

    1997 arXiv

  98. [106]

    M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, High temperature re- summation in the linear delta expansion, Phys. Rev. D 27 60, 105005 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9903353

    1999 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Wainwright, S

    C. Wainwright, S. Profumo, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Gravity Waves from a Cosmological Phase Transition: Gauge Artifacts and Daisy Resummations, Phys. Rev. D 84, 023521 (2011), arXiv:1104.5487 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Kainulainen and O

    K. Kainulainen and O. Koskivaara, Non-equilibrium dy- namics of a scalar field with quantum backreaction, JHEP 12, 190, arXiv:2105.09598 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative Correc- tions as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973)

    1973

  102. [110]

    Luthe and Y

    T. Luthe and Y. Schr¨ oder, Five-loop massive tadpoles, PoS LL2016, 074 (2016), arXiv:1609.06786 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Braaten and A

    E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Free energy of QCD at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3421 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9510408

    1996

  104. [112]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, A. Kurkela, P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, K. Sepp¨ anen, and A. Vuorinen, arXiv:In preparation [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  105. [113]

    D. E. Soper, Techniques for QCD calculations by nu- merical integration, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014009 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9910292

    2000 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Catani, T

    S. Catani, T. Gleisberg, F. Krauss, G. Rodrigo, and J.- C. Winter, From loops to trees by-passing Feynman’s theorem, JHEP 09, 065, arXiv:0804.3170 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, and B. Ruijl, Loop-Tree Duality for Multiloop Numerical Integration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151602 (2019), arXiv:1906.06138 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, A. Pel- loni, and B. Ruijl, Numerical Loop-Tree Duality: con- tour deformation and subtraction, JHEP 04, 096, arXiv:1912.09291 [hep-ph]

    1912 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, A. Pelloni, and B. Ruijl, Manifestly Causal Loop-Tree Duality, arXiv:2009.05509 [hep-ph] (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, A. Pelloni, and B. Ruijl, Local Unitarity: a representation of differential cross-sections that is locally free of infrared singularities at any order, JHEP 04, 104, arXiv:2010.01068 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, and B. Ruijl, Local unitarity: cutting raised propagators and localising renormalisa- tion, JHEP 10, 120, arXiv:2203.11038 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    Buchta, G

    S. Buchta, G. Chachamis, P. Draggiotis, and G. Ro- drigo, Numerical implementation of the loop–tree duality method, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 274 (2017), arXiv:1510.00187 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Becker and S

    S. Becker and S. Weinzierl, Direct numerical integration for multi-loop integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2321 (2013), arXiv:1211.0509 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Runkel, Z

    R. Runkel, Z. Sz˝ or, J. P. Vesga, and S. Weinzierl, Causality and loop-tree duality at higher loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 111603 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 123, 059902 (2019)], arXiv:1902.02135 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Navarrete, R

    P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, and K. Sepp¨ anen, Pertur- bative QCD meets phase quenching: The pressure of cold quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094033 (2024), arXiv:2403.02180 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    K¨ arkk¨ ainen, P

    A. K¨ arkk¨ ainen, P. Navarrete, M. Nurmela, R. Paate- lainen, K. Sepp¨ anen, and A. Vuorinen, Quark Matter at Four Loops: Hardships and How to Overcome Them, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021901 (2025), arXiv:2501.17921 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  117. [125]

    N. N. Bogoliubov and O. S. Parasiuk, On the Multipli- cation of the causal function in the quantum theory of fields, Acta Math. 97, 227 (1957)

    1957

  118. [126]

    Hepp, Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization, Commun

    K. Hepp, Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization, Commun. Math. Phys. 2, 301 (1966)

    1966

  119. [127]

    Zimmermann, Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space, Commun

    W. Zimmermann, Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space, Commun. Math. Phys. 15, 208 (1969)

    1969

  120. [128]

    Hirvonen, Intuitive method for constructing effective field theories, arXiv:2205.02687 [hep-ph] (2022)

    J. Hirvonen, Intuitive method for constructing effective field theories, arXiv:2205.02687 [hep-ph] (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    J. O. Andersen, On effective field theories at finite tem- perature, Other thesis (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9709331

    1997 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Gould and C

    O. Gould and C. Xie, Higher orders for cosmological phase transitions: a global study in a Yukawa model, JHEP 12, 049, arXiv:2310.02308 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  123. [131]

    Chala, V

    M. Chala, V. V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky, and P. Waite, Mapping the shape of the scalar potential with gravita- tional waves, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950223 (2019), arXiv:1905.00911 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  124. [132]

    A. K. Rajantie, Feynman diagrams to three loops in three-dimensional field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 480, 729 (1996), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 513, 761–762 (1998)], arXiv:hep-ph/9606216

    1996 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Nogueira, Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J

    P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105, 279 (1993)

    1993

  126. [134]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM, arXiv:math-ph/0010025 (2000)

    2000 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Delaunay, C

    C. Delaunay, C. Grojean, and J. D. Wells, Dynamics of Non-renormalizable Electroweak Symmetry Break- ing, JHEP 04, 029, arXiv:0711.2511 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  128. [136]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, and F. Riva, Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 854, 592 (2012), arXiv:1107.5441 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  129. [137]

    E. J. Weinberg and A. Wu, Understanding complex per- turbative effective potentials, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2474 (1987)

    1987

  130. [138]

    Andreassen, D

    A. Andreassen, D. Farhi, W. Frost, and M. D. Schwartz, Precision decay rate calculations in quantum field the- ory, Phys. Rev. D 95, 085011 (2017), arXiv:1604.06090 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Navarrete, R

    P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, K. Sepp¨ anen, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Monte Carlo Integration Data for Mas- sive Sum-Integrals (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.15799399

    2025

  132. [140]

    M. E. Shaposhnikov, Standard model solution of the baryogenesis problem, Phys. Lett. B 277, 324 (1992), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 282, 483 (1992)]

    1992

  133. [141]

    M. Dine, R. G. Leigh, P. Y. Huet, A. D. Linde, and D. A. Linde, Towards the theory of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 46, 550 (1992), arXiv:hep- ph/9203203

    1992

  134. [142]

    Laine and Y

    M. Laine and Y. Schroder, Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 73, 085009 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603048

    2006 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and Y. Schroder, Four loop vacuum energy density of the SU(N(c)) + adjoint Higgs theory, JHEP 04, 036, arXiv:hep-ph/0304048

    arXiv

  136. [144]

    Schroder, A fresh look on three-loop sum-integrals, JHEP 08, 095, arXiv:1207.5666 [hep-ph]

    Y. Schroder, A fresh look on three-loop sum-integrals, JHEP 08, 095, arXiv:1207.5666 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  137. [145]

    Navarrete and Y

    P. Navarrete and Y. Schr¨ oder, The g6 pressure of hot Yang-Mills theory: canonical form of the integrand, JHEP 11, 037, arXiv:2408.15830 [hep-ph]. 28

    arXiv

  138. [146]

    Gynther, M

    A. Gynther, M. Laine, Y. Schroder, C. Torrero, and A. Vuorinen, Four-loop pressure of massless O(N) scalar field theory, JHEP 04, 094, arXiv:hep-ph/0703307

    arXiv

  139. [147]

    L¨ ofgren, Stop comparing resummation methods, J

    J. L¨ ofgren, Stop comparing resummation methods, J. Phys. G 50, 125008 (2023), arXiv:2301.05197 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative par- ticle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104094 (2024), arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Niemi, M

    L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171802 (2021), arXiv:2005.11332 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Niemi and T

    L. Niemi and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Investigating two- loop effects for first-order electroweak phase transitions, arXiv:2408.15912 [hep-ph] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Csikor, Z

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, J. Hein, A. Jaster, and I. Montvay, Numerical tests of the electroweak phase transition and thermodynamics of the electroweak plasma, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 421 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9601016

    1996 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Laine, Comparison of 4-D and 3-D lattice results for the electroweak phase transition, Phys

    M. Laine, Comparison of 4-D and 3-D lattice results for the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B385, 249 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9604011

    1996 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Csikor, Z

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, and J. Heitger, Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 21 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9809291

    1999 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Laine, The Renormalized gauge coupling and non- perturbative tests of dimensional reduction, JHEP 06, 020, arXiv:hep-ph/9903513

    M. Laine, The Renormalized gauge coupling and non- perturbative tests of dimensional reduction, JHEP 06, 020, arXiv:hep-ph/9903513

    arXiv

  147. [155]

    Ekstedt, Higher-order corrections to the bubble- nucleation rate at finite temperature, Eur

    A. Ekstedt, Higher-order corrections to the bubble- nucleation rate at finite temperature, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 173 (2022), arXiv:2104.11804 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  148. [156]

    G. D. Moore, Measuring the broken phase sphaleron rate nonperturbatively, Phys. Rev. D59, 014503 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9805264

    1999 arXiv

  149. [157]

    X.-X. Li, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenka- nen, and Y. Wu, An Effective Sphaleron Awakens, arXiv:2506.01585 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Annala, K

    J. Annala, K. Rummukainen, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Non-perturbative determination of the sphaleron rate for first-order phase transitions, arXiv:2506.04939 [hep- ph] (2025)

    2025

  151. [159]

    Caffo, H

    M. Caffo, H. Czyz, S. Laporta, and E. Remiddi, The Master differential equations for the two loop sunrise selfmass amplitudes, Nuovo Cim. A 111, 365 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9805118

    1998 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathemati- cal Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (New York: Dover Publications, 1972)

    1972

  153. [161]

    Nishimura and Y

    M. Nishimura and Y. Schroder, IBP methods at finite temperature, JHEP 09, 051, arXiv:1207.4042 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  154. [162]

    https://github.com/gplepage/vegas

  155. [163]

    Blinov, S

    N. Blinov, S. Profumo, and T. Stefaniak, The Elec- troweak Phase Transition in the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 07, 028, arXiv:1504.05949 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.