Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

Emergent Multiferroic Altermagnets and Spin Control via Noncollinear Molecular Polarization

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that arranging molecular electric dipoles noncollinearly turns antiferromagnetic molecular ferroelectrics into altermagnets whose spin polarization can be switched on, off, or reversed by external stimuli.

desk verdict A sound symmetry-based proposal for molecular ferroelectric altermagnets with a clear testable switching mechanism, but the spin-control claim currently rests on unverified stability of the constructed configurations. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07039 v2 pith:EJ4CQ4VF submitted 2025-07-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ziye Zhu , Yuntian Liu , Xunkai Duan , Jiayong Zhang , Bowen Hao , Su-Huai Wei , Igor Zutic , Tong Zhou This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismmolecularferroelectricsmultiferroicsspin-groupsymmetryhybridorganic-inorganicperovskitesmetal-organicframeworksmagneto-opticalKerreffectspinpolarizationcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a design rule: in a molecular ferroelectric with antiferromagnetically ordered magnetic atoms, the orientation of the surrounding molecular dipoles decides whether the material is a plain antiferromagnet or an altermagnet. When the molecular polarizations are collinear, the two spin sublattices are related by translation or inversion and the bands are spin-degenerate. When they are arranged noncollinearly, the sublattices are connected only by a rotation, which produces altermagnetic spin splitting with zero net magnetization and a finite spin polarization. Reversing one molecular polarization flips the sign of that spin polarization. Because molecular dipoles can be steered by electric fields, pressure, and light, the proposal gives a practical handle for electrical or optical control of spin in organic spintronic and multiferroic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-group symmetry connecting the two antiferromagnetic sublattices, analyzed together with a minimal tight-binding model of a two-dimensional square lattice with nested antiferromagnetic order and surrounding polar molecules. The machinery identifies which symmetry operation ($t$, $I$, or $R$) pairs the sublattices: collinear $P_M$ keeps $t$ or $I$ and gives conventional antiferromagnetism, while noncollinear $P_M$ leaves only a rotation $C_2$ and gives altermagnetism. In the tight-binding model, first- and second-nearest-neighbor hoppings cannot distinguish the $P_M$ configurations, but third-nearest-neighbor hoppings between sublattices become inequivalent in the NP state, and interchanging the two inequivalent hopping strengths (NP′) reverses the spin polarization. The same symmetry logic is then applied to real materials, with the magneto-optical Kerr effect proposed as the experimental readout.

What would settle it

First-principles total-energy and phonon calculations for [MA]2MnCl4 that include all four molecular configurations would settle the question: if NP and NP′ are not local minima, or if the barrier to flip one methylammonium molecule is too high for electric fields to overcome, the claimed on/off/reverse spin control cannot be realized. Experimentally, a sample prepared in the NP configuration that shows zero Kerr rotation and spin-degenerate bands would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that noncollinear molecular polarization $P_M$ is a symmetry switch for magnetism. In the parallel (PP) and antiparallel (AP) arrangements, the spin sublattices are connected by translation $t$ or inversion $I$, forcing conventional antiferromagnetism with zero spin polarization $P_S$. In the noncollinear (NP) arrangement, $t$ and $I$ are broken and the sublattices are connected by a two-fold rotation $R$, so the system becomes an altermagnet with finite $P_S$ and momentum-dependent spin splitting; flipping one molecule (NP′) reverses $P_S$. The tight-binding model shows that this switch is carried by third-nearest-neighbor hoppings between the two sublattices, which become inequivalent only when $P_M$ is noncollinear. First-principles calculations on layered [MA]$_2$MnCl$_4$, other hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites, and metal-organic frameworks reproduce the predicted band splitting and show a magneto-optical Kerr signal whose sign follows the $P_M$ twist.

Load-bearing premise

The four molecular arrangements (PP, AP, NP, and NP′) are assumed to be stable, experimentally reachable states of the material, but the paper reports no total energies, energy barriers, or switching dynamics for them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • External stimuli that twist molecular polarizations—electric fields, pressure, or light—can toggle the spin polarization on or off and reverse its sign without changing the magnetic order.
  • The size of the spin splitting is tunable by molecular choice: replacing MA with PMA in [MA]2MnCl4 raises the splitting from 26 meV to 41 meV, and [DMA]Cu(HCOO)3 reaches 170 meV.
  • The magneto-optical Kerr effect gives a direct, zero-magnetic-field readout: near-zero Kerr rotation in PP and AP configurations and a sign-reversing Kerr rotation between NP and NP′.
  • The design principle extends beyond organic frameworks, with BaFe2Se3 and Pb2MnWO6 identified as inorganic examples.
  • Because the materials are light-element based, the spin splitting is largely nonrelativistic, suggesting long spin lifetimes and a route to study organic spin dynamics without strong spin-orbit coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not report total energies or switching barriers for the four molecular configurations; a natural next step is to compute whether NP and NP′ are local minima and how large the barrier is for flipping one molecule, since the whole proposal depends on those states being reachable.
  • If the symmetry rule is general, the same noncollinear-polarization trick should work in other antiferromagnetic lattices decorated with polar groups, so the framework predicts a family of switchable altermagnets whose spin splitting grows with octahedral distortion; this could be screened computationally.
  • A clean experiment would prepare a single NP domain, measure spin-resolved bands by ARPES together with Kerr rotation, and then reverse a single molecular polarization optically or electrically; observing the predicted sign reversal would close the loop between the model and device function.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a design framework for 'molecular ferroelectric altermagnets' (MFEAM) in which noncollinear molecular polarization P_M breaks the translation or inversion symmetries that connect antiparallel spin sublattices, leaving a rotation-type symmetry [C2||R] that permits altermagnetic spin splitting with finite spin polarization P_S. The authors present a tight-binding model with third-nearest-neighbor hoppings to show that parallel/antiparallel P_M configurations are conventional antiferromagnets while noncollinear (NP) configurations are altermagnets, and that reversing one P_M in the NP configuration reverses the sign of P_S. They then report DFT band structures for [MA]2MnCl4 and for a series of HOIPs and MOFs, claiming that these materials realize the predicted configurations, and they compute magneto-optical Kerr signals that differ between AFM and AM states. The central advertised capability is electrical or optical control of spin polarization by twisting molecular dipoles.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper introduces a genuinely new route to altermagnetism in an important materials family: molecular ferroelectrics with antiferromagnetic sublattices and noncollinear molecular polarization. The symmetry analysis is grounded in the established spin-group classification, the DFT band structures are independent first-principles results, and the MOKE prediction is a concrete, falsifiable observable. The candidate materials are well-studied HOIPs and MOFs, and the proposed enhancement of spin splitting by molecular size is an attractive design handle. The main weakness is that the switching claim rests on four manually constructed configurations whose stability and accessibility are not demonstrated; the paper's own text provides only a construction statement, not total energies, barriers, or relaxed-structure evidence. This makes the proposal promising but currently incomplete as a claim of electric-field-controlled spin manipulation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Material Realization (Fig. 3)] The spin-control claim requires that the NP and NP′ configurations are physically accessible states, but the manuscript reports no total energies, no relaxed-geometry confirmation, and no energy barriers between PP/AP and NP/NP′. The sentence 'Here, we constructed four different configurations corresponding to our design principle' is not sufficient to demonstrate that these are local minima or experimentally reachable states. If NP/NP′ relax to PP/AP or require prohibitively high barriers to form, the advertised toggling of P_S is not established even though the symmetry analysis remains formally correct. Please add total-energy comparisons of the four configurations, confirm whether the geometries were relaxed, and provide barrier estimates (e.g., NEB) for the P_M reversal path, with explicit verification that the AFM order is preserved.
  2. [Effective model (Eq. 1 and Fig. 2)] The mechanism in the tight-binding model is carried entirely by the hand-set 3NN hopping parameters (h_A^{δ1,3}, h_A^{δ2,4}, etc.), with no first-principles extraction or quantitative mapping from P_M orientation to these parameters. The assertion that NN and 2NN hoppings cannot induce the needed sublattice inequivalence is not backed by a parameter-space scan or by comparison to DFT-derived hoppings. As a result, the TB model is an illustrative demonstration rather than a validated model of the proposed materials. Please either fit the TB parameters to DFT (e.g., via Wannier functions) for at least one representative material or show that the altermagnetic splitting and P_S reversal are robust over a broad range of physically reasonable parameters.
  3. [Material Realization; claims about experimental precedent] The statement that 'all our proposed P_M configurations, PP, AP, and NP/NP′ with AFM order have been achieved experimentally' and that they 'can be realized simply by twisting P_M' overstates what Refs. [46–54] establish. Those references demonstrate switchable molecular polarization in related molecular ferroelectrics and HOIPs, but they do not show that the specific NP/NP′ arrangements in [MA]2MnCl4 or the listed MOFs are stable and switchable. Please either provide a concrete experimental precedent for the actual compounds and configurations or soften the claim to a design proposal conditional on realizability, with the energetic evidence requested above.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'on and offand even reverse' contains a missing space; it should read 'on and off and even reverse'.
  2. [Notation throughout] The symbols [C2∥t], [C2∥I], and 'C 2t' are used inconsistently across the text and Figure 2; please define the rotation operation explicitly (e.g., C_2x t) and use a single consistent notation.
  3. [Figure 1(b)] The citation 'as shown in [Figure 1(b)]' contains stray square brackets; it should be either 'Figure 1(b)' or a proper citation reference.
  4. [Spin polarization P_S] P_S is used throughout without a formal definition; please state whether it is the net spin polarization, the local spin-resolved density-of-states asymmetry, or the quantity used in the MOKE calculation, and give its dependence on the band splitting.
  5. [Figure 2 caption] The caption 'spin lattices connected by symmetry t, I, C_2t, C_2t' is unclear because the same symbol is used for NP and NP′ while their spin polarizations are opposite; please clarify how the rotation symmetry differs between the two configurations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-group criterion is an external benchmark and the DFT band structures are independent first-principles results.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level claimed. The central symmetry statement, that noncollinear P_M produces an altermagnet with [C2||R] symmetry, is a spin-group classification checked against external benchmarks (refs 12, 19, 57-62) rather than against the paper's own target result. The tight-binding model in Eq. (1) uses hand-set hopping parameters (e.g., h^{delta1,3}_A = h^{delta2,4}_B < h^{delta2,4}_A = h^{delta1,3}_B in the NP configuration) to illustrate the mechanism; these are explicit model inputs, not fitted parameters later relabeled as predictions. The DFT band structures and MOKE signals for [MA]2MnCl4 and the HOIP/MOF series are independent first-principles calculations performed on constructed configurations; they do not impose the target spin splitting as an input. The NP' reversal of P_S is first shown in the TB model by interchanging 3NN hoppings, which by construction reverses the model's spin polarization, but the same effect is then confirmed in DFT bands and in the sign of the Kerr rotation, so the material-level claim does not reduce to the model input. Self-citations (refs 35, 36, 82, 83) appear only as contextual examples of prior strategies and applications, not as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatz justifications; the SPG and altermagnetism classifications cited are external. A genuine gap is that the NP/NP' configurations are asserted to be realizable ('Here, we constructed four different configurations corresponding to our design principle') without reporting total energies, relaxations, or switching barriers, so the spin-control claim is conditional on those configurations being stable or accessible. This is a feasibility/completeness caveat, not a circularity, because the symmetry analysis and the conditional first-principles results stand independently of whether those configurations are the ground states.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on spin-group theory, the weak-SOC assumption, the hand-constructed P_M configurations, and the hand-set tight-binding parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • 3NN hopping parameters h_A^delta1,3 and h_A^delta2,4 = 0.03 eV and 0.08 eV
    Chosen by hand in the tight-binding model to produce sublattice inequivalence in the NP and NP' configurations; the values encode the mechanism rather than being derived from molecular polarization or DFT.
  • AFM exchange field M_A, M_B = +/-0.4 eV
    On-site exchange field in the tight-binding model, set by hand to generate the AFM band structure shown in Figure 2.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math In the absence of spin-orbit coupling, spin-group symmetry operations of type [C2||R] imply altermagnetic spin splitting.
    From spin-group theory (Refs. 57-62); used in the Design principle section to classify PP, AP, NP, and NP' configurations.
  • domain assumption The organic materials have negligible spin-orbit coupling, so spin groups apply.
    Stated in Material Realization: the materials are composed primarily of light elements and SOC is 'weak, as confirmed by our calculations in Supplementary Note S4'.
  • ad hoc to paper The four constructed P_M configurations are physically realizable and switchable by external stimuli without altering the AFM order.
    No energetics, barriers, or dynamics are provided; this assumption is central to the switching claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The tight-binding model's 3NN hopping asymmetry faithfully represents the effect of P_M on real materials.
    The 3NN parameters are hand-set, and no microscopic derivation from P_M or DFT Wannier functions is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent Multiferroic Altermagnets and Spin Control via Noncollinear Molecular Polarization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJ4CQ4VF

@misc{pith2026250707039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent Multiferroic Altermagnets and Spin Control via Noncollinear Molecular Polarization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJ4CQ4VF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07039}
}
read the original abstract

Altermagnets, with spin splitting and vanishing magnetization, have been attributed to many fascinating phenomena and potential applications. In particular, integrating ferroelectricity with altermagnetism to enable magnetoelectric coupling and electric control of spin has drawn significant attention. However, its experimental realization and precise spin manipulation remain elusive. Here, by focusing on molecular ferroelectrics, the first discovered ferroelectrics renowned for their highly controllable molecular polarizations and structural flexibility, we reveal that these obstacles can be removed by an emergent multiferroic altermagnets with tunable spin polarization in a large class of fabricated organic materials. Using a symmetry-based design and a tight-binding model, we uncover the underlying mechanism of such molecular ferroelectric altermagnets and demonstrate how noncollinear molecular polarization can switch the spin polarization on and off and even reverse its sign. From the first-principles calculations, we verify the feasibility of these materials in a series of well-established hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites and metal-organic frameworks. Our findings bridge molecular ferroelectrics and altermagnetic spintronics, highlighting an unexplored potential of multifunctional organic multiferroics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07039 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇZuti´c, J

    I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    E. Y . Tsymbal and I. ˇZuti´c, eds.,Spintronics Handbook Spin Transport and Magnetism, 2nd Edition(CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2019). 6

    2019

  3. [3]

    H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. O. E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y . Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Electric-field control of ferromag- netism, Nature408, 944 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Eerenstein, N

    W. Eerenstein, N. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, Multiferroic and mag- netoelectric materials, Nature442, 759 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Cheong and M

    S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: A magnetic twist for ferroelectricity, Nat. Mater.6, 13 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Dong, J.-M

    S. Dong, J.-M. Liu, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Ren, Multiferroic ma- terials and magnetoelectric physics: symmetry, entanglement, excitation, and topology, Adv. Phys.64, 519 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, The evo- lution of multiferroics, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16046 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Baltz, A

    V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    ˇSmejkal, Y

    L. ˇSmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, B. Yan, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys.14, 242 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    H. Chen, L. Liu, X. Zhou, Z. Meng, X. Wang, Z. Duan, G. Zhao, H. Yan, P. Qin, and Z. Liu, Emerging antiferromag- nets for spintronics, Adv. Mater.36, 2310379 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Shao and E

    D. Shao and E. Tsymbal, Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions for Spintronics, npj Spintron.2, 13 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Mazin, Altermagnetism then and now, Physics17, 4 (2024)

    I. Mazin, Altermagnetism then and now, Physics17, 4 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Wright, Altermagnets that turn on and off, Physics18, 58 (2025)

    K. Wright, Altermagnets that turn on and off, Physics18, 58 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz ´alez- Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    C.-C. Wei, E. Lawrence, A. Tran, and H. Ji, Crystal chemistry and design principles of altermagnets, ACS Org. Inorg. Au4, 604 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Tamang, S

    R. Tamang, S. Gurung, D. Rai, S. Brahimi, and S. Lounis, Newly discovered magnetic phase: A brief review on altermag- nets, arXiv:2412.05377 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermagnetism: A chemical perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 2257 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Bl¨ugel, Different facets of unconventional magnetism, Nat. Phys.21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Krempask `y, L

    J. Krempask `y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ıˇrov´a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V . Strocov, D. Usanov, W. Pudelko, R. Gonz `alez-Hern`andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov `a, Z. ˇSob´aˇn, R. Gon- zalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sino...

    2024

  18. [26]

    O. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y . Niu, A. Zakharov, S. Fro- mage, C. Fields, S. Heywood, R. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, et al., Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe, Nature636, 348 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature638, 654 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room-temperatured-wave alter- magnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y . Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu,et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin– valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermag- net candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    K. S. Denisov and I. ˇZuti´c, Anisotropic spin dynamics in anti- ferromagnets with a nonrelativistic spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B 110, L180403 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Z. Guo, X. Wang, W. Wang, G. Zhang, X. Zhou, and Z. Cheng, Spin-polarized antiferromagnets for spintronics, Adv. Mater. , 2505779 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Y . Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Bilayer metal–organic framework altermagnets with electrically tunable spin-split val- leys, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 14806 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Lin, S.-B

    H.-J. Lin, S.-B. Zhang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Coulomb drag in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 136301 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    J. D. Cao, K. S. Denisov, Y . Liu, and I. Zutic, Symmetry clas- sification for alternating excitons in two-dimensional altermag- nets, arXiv:2506.05753 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y . Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity al- ters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. ˇZuti´c, and T. Zhou, Two- dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization, Nano Lett.25, 9456 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagnetoelec- tric effect, arXiv:2411.19928 (2024)

    L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagnetoelec- tric effect, arXiv:2411.19928 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, R. Hu, S. Yan, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetism induced by sliding ferroelectricity via lattice symmetry-mediated magnetoelectric coupling, Nano Lett.24, 11179 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    W.-T. Guo, J. Xu, Y . Yang, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, Altermag- netic type-II multiferroics with N ´eel-order-locked electric po- larization, arXiv:2505.01964 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sheng, J

    Y . Sheng, J. Zhang, J. Liu, and M. Wu, Ubiquitous van der Waals altermagnetism with sliding/moire ferroelectricity, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 297511 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Y . Zhu, M. Gu, Y . Liu, X. Chen, Y . Li, S. Du, and Q. Liu, Sliding ferroelectric control of unconventional magnetism in stacked bilayers, arXiv:2502.17095 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, W. Wang, Y . Liu, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Proposing altermagnetic-ferroelectric type-III mul- tiferroics with robust magnetoelectric coupling, Adv. Mater. , 2502575 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Valasek, Piezo-electric and allied phenomena in rochelle salt, Phys

    J. Valasek, Piezo-electric and allied phenomena in rochelle salt, Phys. Rev.17, 475 (1921)

    1921

  37. [45]

    C. Wang, L. You, D. Cobden, and J. Wang, Towards two- dimensional van der Waals ferroelectrics, Nat. Mater.22, 542 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Pan, Z.-X

    Q. Pan, Z.-X. Gu, R.-J. Zhou, Z.-J. Feng, Y .-A. Xiong, T.-T. Sha, Y .-M. You, and R.-G. Xiong, The past 10 years of molecu- 7 lar ferroelectrics: structures, design, and properties, Chem. Soc. Rev.53, 5781 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Zhang, Y .-Y

    H.-Y . Zhang, Y .-Y . Tang, P.-P. Shi, and R.-G. Xiong, Toward the targeted design of molecular ferroelectrics: modifying molec- ular symmetries and homochirality, Acc. Chem. Res.52, 1928 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    W.-J. Xu, S. Kopyl, A. Kholkin, and J. Rocha, Hybrid organic- inorganic perovskites: Polar properties and applications, Coord. Chem. Rev.387, 398 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    S. Liu, R. Guo, and F. Xie, The effects of organic cation rota- tion in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites: A critical review, Mater. Des.221, 110951 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Su, S.-Q

    S.-Q. Su, S.-Q. Wu, S. Kanegawa, K. Yamamoto, and O. Sato, Control of electronic polarization via charge ordering and elec- tron transfer: electronic ferroelectrics and electronic pyro- electrics, Chem. Sci.14, 10631 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Di Sante, A

    D. Di Sante, A. Stroppa, P. Jain, and S. Picozzi, Tuning the ferroelectric polarization in a multiferroic metal-organic frame- work, J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 18126 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    P. Jain, A. Stroppa, D. Nabok, A. Marino, A. Rubano, D. Pa- paro, M. Matsubara, H. Nakotte, M. Fiebig, S. Picozzi, E. S. Choi, A. K. Cheetham, C. Draxl, N. S. Dalal, and V . S. Zapf, Switchable electric polarization and ferroelectric domains in a metal-organic-framework, npj Q...

    2016

  45. [53]

    F. Lou, T. Gu, J. Ji, J. Feng, H. Xiang, and A. Stroppa, Tun- able spin textures in polar antiferromagnetic hybrid organic- inorganic perovskites by electric and magnetic fields, npj Com- put. Mater.6, 114 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Z. Wang, Q. Wang, L. Quan, and S. Ren, Reversible ferroelec- tric polarization modulation of chiral molecular ferroelectrics by circularly polarized light, Adv. Sci. , 2414977 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    V . A. Dediu, L. E. Hueso, I. Bergenti, and C. Taliani, Spin routes in organic semiconductors, Nat. Mater.8, 707 (2009)

    2009

  48. [56]

    Li and G

    D. Li and G. Yu, Innovation of materials, devices, and function- alized interfaces in organic spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2100550 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica76, 538 (1974)

    1974

  50. [58]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Jiang, Z

    Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a com- plete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, J. Li, Y . Liu, and Q. Liu, Spin space group the- ory and unconventional magnons in collinear magnets, Nature 640, 349 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    W. Li, Z. Wang, F. Deschler, S. Gao, R. H. Friend, and A. K. Cheetham, Chemically diverse and multifunctional hy- brid organic–inorganic perovskites, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 16099 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Y . Lu, Q. Wang, L. Han, Y . Zhao, Z. He, W. Song, C. Song, and Z. Miao, Spintronic phenomena and applications in hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2314427 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Septiany, D

    L. Septiany, D. Tulip, M. Chislov, J. Baas, and G. R. Blake, Polar structure and two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromag- netic properties of arylamine-based manganese chloride layered organic–inorganic perovskites, Inorg. Chem.60, 15151 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    K. W. Lee, C. H. Lee, C. E. Lee, and J. Kang, Magnetic ordering in two-dimensional heisenberg antiferromagnets with variable interlayer distances, Phys. Rev. B62, 95 (2000)

    2000

  59. [67]

    Kim and N

    Y . Kim and N. Hur, Magnetodielectric effect in an organic- inorganic hybrid layered perovskite (CH 3NH3)2MnCl4 with canted antiferromagnetism, J. Appl. Phys.129(2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    F.-R. Fan, H. Wu, D. Nabok, S. Hu, W. Ren, C. Draxl, and A. Stroppa, Electric-magneto-optical Kerr effect in a hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite, J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 12883 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    K. Yang, W. Hu, H. Wu, M.-H. Whangbo, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Stroppa, Magneto-optical Kerr switching properties of (CrI3)2 and (CrBr3/CrI3) bilayers, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 1373 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    N. Ding, K. Yananose, C. Rizza, F.-R. Fan, S. Dong, and A. Stroppa, Magneto-optical Kerr effect in ferroelectric an- tiferromagnetic two-dimensional heterostructures, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces15, 22282 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    W. Sun, H. Ye, L. Liang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and S.-S. Wang, Stacking-dependent ferroicity of a reversed bilayer: Altermag- netism or ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. B110, 224418 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Oppeneer, Chapter 3 magneto-optical Kerr spectra, Hand- book of Magnetic Materials,13, 229 (2001)

    P. Oppeneer, Chapter 3 magneto-optical Kerr spectra, Hand- book of Magnetic Materials,13, 229 (2001)

    2001

  65. [73]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, S. Huang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and Z. Cheng, Designing spin symmetry for altermagnetism with strong magnetoelectric coupling, Adv. Sci. , e03235 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Orlandi, L

    F. Orlandi, L. Righi, R. Cabassi, D. Delmonte, C. Pernechele, F. Bolzoni, F. Mezzadri, M. Solzi, M. Merlini, and G. Calestani, Structural and electric evidence of ferrielectric state in Pb2MnWO6 double perovskite system, Inorg. Chem.53, 10283 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    Dong, J.-M

    S. Dong, J.-M. Liu, and E. Dagotto, BaFe2Se3: A high TC mag- netic multiferroic with large ferrielectric polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 187204 (2014)

    2014

  68. [76]

    K. Y . Bliokh, F. J. Rodr´ıguez-Fortu˜no, F. Nori, and A. V . Zayats, Spin-orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photonics9, 796 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    Amundsen, J

    M. Amundsen, J. Linder, J. W. Robinson, I. ˇZuti´c, and N. Banerjee, Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in superconduct- ing hybrid structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 021003 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Wright and A

    M. Wright and A. Uddin, Organic—inorganic hybrid solar cells: A comparative review, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells107, 87 (2012)

    2012

  71. [79]

    Z. Shi, J. Guo, Y . Chen, Q. Li, Y . Pan, H. Zhang, Y . Xia, and W. Huang, Lead-free organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications: Recent advances and perspectives, Adv. Mater.29, 1605005 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    L. Jiao, Y . Wang, H.-L. Jiang, and Q. Xu, Metal–organic frame- works as platforms for catalytic applications, Adv. Mater.30, 1703663 (2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    Liang, T

    S. Liang, T. Xie, N. A. Blumenschein, T. Zhou, T. Erse- vim, Z. Song, J. Liang, M. A. Susner, B. S. Conner, S.- J. Gong, J.-P. Wang, M. Ouyang, I. ˇZuti´c, A. L. Friedman, X. Zhang, and C. Gong, Small-voltage multiferroic control of two-dimensional magnetic insulators, Nat. El...

    2023

  74. [82]

    Z. Cui, X. Duan, J. Wen, Z. Zhu, J. Zhang, J. Pei, C. Wen, T. Zhou, B. Wu, and B. Sa, Ferroelectric control of val- leytronic nonvolatile storage in HfCl 2/Sc2CO2 heterostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 122902 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Zhou and I

    T. Zhou and I. ˇZuti´c, Asymmetry in the magnetic neighbour- hood, Nat. Mater.22, 284 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.