Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

First measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter: achievements and prospects

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A gallium arsenide crystal operated at about 10 mK separates alpha particles from beta/gamma radiation by reading heat and scintillation light together, with alpha events producing about ten times more light per unit energy.

desk verdict A genuine first—GaAs as a dual-readout scintillating calorimeter—but the factor-of-ten alpha/beta light-yield ratio rests on an extrapolation and should be treated as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07119 v1 pith:E2FZVN6F submitted 2025-07-07 physics.ins-det hep-ex

A. Melchiorre , D. L. Helis , A. Puiu , G. Benato , P. Carniti , I. Colantoni , A. Continenza , N. Di Marco
show 18 more authors
A. Ferella C. Ferrari F. Giannessi C. Gotti E. Monticone S. Nagorny E. Olivieri L. Pagnanini G. Pessina C. Petrucci S. Pirro A. Prajapati G. Profeta M. Rajteri P. Settembri A. Shaikina C. Tresca D. Trotta
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-dethep-ex
keywords low-temperaturecalorimetersgalliumarsenidescintillatordualheat-lightreadoutparticlediscriminationalphalight-yieldanomalyquenchingfactordarkmattersearchesNTLamplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first operation of a gallium arsenide (GaAs) crystal as a cryogenic scintillating calorimeter that reads out both the heat (phonon) signal and the scintillation light from every event. The central result is a clear separation between $\alpha$ particles and $\beta$/gamma radiation in the light-versus-heat plane, with a light yield at 1 MeV of $0.9 \pm 0.2$ keV/MeV for $\alpha$-induced events and $0.07 \pm 0.01$ keV/MeV for $\beta$/gamma events, a ratio of about ten. That ratio is anomalous: in most scintillators heavy particles produce less light than electrons of the same energy, not more. The authors argue the anomaly is worth pursuing because it may make low-energy nuclear recoils from light dark matter scattering easier to see, and they also report improved heat-channel resolution, with a 3.5 g crystal reaching a 44.5 eV baseline resolution and a 133.5 eV analysis threshold. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as establishing the first demonstration of this detector concept and a quantitative first look at the unusual luminescence behavior, with the ratio measurement itself flagged as preliminary.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dual-readout bolometer itself: a GaAs wafer (4.3 g or 3.5 g) instrumented with a germanium neutron-transmutation-doped thermistor records the heat channel, while a thin germanium plate mounted 10 mm away records scintillation photons, with an applied bias providing NTL (voltage-assisted) amplification that improved the light detector's baseline resolution from 60.4 eV to 5.2 eV. Particle identification comes from comparing the light energy $E_L$ to the heat energy $E_H$ event by event: $\beta$/gamma events lie on a straight line $E_L = a' E_H$ with $a' = 0.069(1)$ keV/MeV, while $\alpha$ events follow $E_L = a E_H^3 + b E_H^2 + c E_H$ with $a = -0.06(2)$, $b = 0.54(1)$, $c = 0.4(2)$, whose slope near 1 MeV gives the ten-fold higher light yield. The physical expectation that GaAs would behave this way comes from its direct band gap of 1.42 eV and its previously reported cryogenic scintillation of about 2 photons per keV, which in principle yields a large photon count per low-energy recoil.

What would settle it

Run the same dual-readout setup with a mono-energetic alpha source whose full-energy peaks appear in the heat spectrum, plus high-energy gamma calibration lines above 1 MeV to anchor the heat scale; if the alpha band then maps to a different true deposited energy, the reported ratio of about ten will not survive unchanged.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that GaAs can serve as a dual-readout cryogenic scintillating calorimeter: the same energy deposition produces a phonon pulse in the GaAs wafer, sensed by a neutron-transmutation-doped germanium thermistor, and a scintillation pulse in a nearby germanium light detector operated with NTL (voltage-assisted) amplification. Calibration runs with an X-ray source and a uranium $\alpha$ source produced a light-versus-heat scatter plot with two well-separated bands. Fitting those bands gives a light yield for $\beta$/gamma events of $0.07 \pm 0.01$ keV/MeV (about 0.05 photons/keV at the 840 nm GaAs emission line) and for $\alpha$ events of $0.9 \pm 0.2$ keV/MeV, both evaluated at 1 MeV of heat energy, i.e., an $\alpha$-to-$\beta$/gamma ratio of about ten. The paper explicitly notes that this ratio carries an additional 10--20% uncertainty because the $\alpha$ energy scale rests on an extrapolation from X-ray calibration lines below 60 keV with no distinct $\alpha$ peaks. It also reports improved heat-channel performance over its earlier measurement: $140 \pm 8$ eV resolution at 5.9 keV for the 4.3 g crystal and $59 \pm 1$ eV for the 3.5 g crystal, with baselines of $121 \pm 2$ eV and $44.5 \pm 0.8$ eV respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The ten-to-one alpha-to-beta/gamma light-yield ratio rests on a heat energy scale calibrated only up to 60 keV and assumed linear to several MeV, with alpha-particle energies inferred from that scale at a stated 10--20 percent uncertainty; if the scale is wrong for alphas, the ratio changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Event-by-event alpha/beta-gamma separation is demonstrated in GaAs, so alpha-emitting contamination can be tagged and rejected as background in a future dark-matter or rare-event search.
  • The anomalous alpha-enhanced light yield implies that nuclear recoils, which also produce dense ionisation tracks, may scintillate more than electron recoils, potentially improving sensitivity to light dark matter scattering on gallium or arsenic nuclei.
  • Thresholds of 360 eV (4.3 g crystal) and 133.5 eV (3.5 g crystal) bring sub-keV recoil detection within reach, the regime relevant for sub-GeV dark matter and dark-photon absorption.
  • The NTL-amplified germanium light detector improves light-channel baseline resolution by a factor of 12, showing that the dual-readout approach can handle very faint scintillation signals.
  • If the anomaly survives a proper alpha calibration, GaAs joins ZnSe and ZnO as another cryogenic scintillator with a quenching factor above one, a small family with reversed alpha/beta response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the alpha enhancement is real, the standard explanation of quenching as saturation of luminescence centres under high ionisation density is incomplete for GaAs; a density-dependent recombination channel involving defects or excitonic states would be needed.
  • Because the alpha energy scale carries a 10--20% uncertainty, the ratio is best read as a preliminary value; a moderate shift in the assigned alpha energies would change the ratio, though a ratio well above one would likely remain.
  • The same light-versus-heat technique could be applied to other small-band-gap polar semiconductors, such as indium phosphide or aluminium arsenide, that are predicted to be sensitive to dark-photon absorption.
  • A direct testable extension is to expose GaAs to a neutron source to produce nuclear recoils; if recoil events fall in the alpha-enhanced band rather than on the beta/gamma line, the dark-matter motivation is confirmed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first operation of GaAs crystals as cryogenic scintillating calorimeters with dual heat and light readout within the DAREDEVIL project. Two GaAs wafers (4.3 g and 3.5 g) are read out by Ge-NTD thermistors for the phonon channel and by a Ge light detector with NTL amplification for the scintillation channel. The authors achieve baseline resolutions of 121 ± 2 eV and 44.5 ± 0.8 eV, resolve 55Fe Kα/Kβ lines, and, using simultaneous X-ray and 238U/234U alpha sources, observe two separated populations in the light-versus-heat scatter plot. They report light yields at 1 MeV of 0.07 ± 0.01 keV/MeV for beta/gamma events and 0.9 ± 0.2 keV/MeV for alpha events, interpreting the factor-of-ten ratio as an unusual alpha-induced light enhancement similar to ZnSe and ZnO.

Significance. If the quantitative light-yield values are correct, this is a valuable first demonstration of GaAs as a dual-readout scintillating calorimeter, with direct relevance to low-mass dark-matter searches via electron recoils and to particle identification in rare-event experiments. The paper's strengths are its clear experimental setup, the resolved low-energy X-ray spectra, the improved baseline resolution relative to the authors' previous work, and the explicit acknowledgment of energy-scale limitations. The dual-readout concept and the qualitative particle discrimination are convincingly demonstrated. However, the headline alpha light yield is obtained by extrapolating a cubic fit beyond the fitted energy range, so the quantitative factor-of-ten ratio is not yet firmly established; this limits the strength of the claims as currently written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1] The headline alpha light yield of 0.9 ± 0.2 keV/MeV at 1 MeV is obtained by evaluating the cubic polynomial EL = a EH^3 + b EH^2 + c EH, with a = -0.06(2), b = 0.54(1), c = 0.4(2), at EH = 1 MeV. The text states that the alpha band lies between 2 and 4.5 MeV, so 1 MeV is outside the fitted region and the cubic is unconstrained there. Since c is the dominant term at 1 MeV and has a 50% fractional uncertainty, the quoted uncertainty does not include model or range extrapolation error. Please either report the alpha light yield at a directly measured energy, or add a robustness test showing how the 1 MeV value changes under alternative fit forms (e.g., linear and quadratic) over the same 2–4.5 MeV range, and propagate that spread into the quoted uncertainty.
  2. [Section 4.1] The heat-channel energy scale for beta/gamma events is calibrated with X-ray lines only up to about 60 keV, and linear response is assumed up to several MeV; the authors acknowledge this assumption but do not assign a systematic uncertainty to it. In addition, the alpha energy scale carries a stated 10–20% uncertainty because no clear alpha calibration peaks are available. These two systematics are not propagated into the quoted light-yield values or into the alpha-to-beta/gamma ratio. Please provide a systematic-error budget for the energy scales and state the resulting uncertainty on the factor-of-ten ratio.
  3. [Section 5] The conclusion states that the beta/gamma light yield was '0.07 ± 0.001 keV/MeV', while Table 2 and Section 4.1 report '0.07 ± 0.01 keV/MeV'; this is a numerical inconsistency that should be corrected. In addition, the concluding sentence repeats the factor-of-ten ratio as a settled value; given the extrapolation and energy-scale issues raised above, the conclusion should qualify this ratio as preliminary or as an extrapolated estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 4] The axis label 'events / events' is unclear; 'counts' or 'arbitrary units' would be more informative, and the inset showing the 6 keV–1.2 MeV region is too small to read in the current figure.
  2. [Figure 5] The label '3 RMS' should be '3σ' (three times the root-mean-square baseline resolution), to match the text.
  3. [References] References [38] and [39] appear to be duplicate entries for the same publication ('python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets'); please merge or renumber them.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract states that both light yields are 'measured at 1 MeV'; for alpha events this is a nominal energy with a 10–20% uncertainty, so the abstract should either mention this caveat or phrase the alpha value as an extrapolated estimate.
  5. [Section 2] The text says the combination of gamma-ray and X-ray sources has a total activity of approximately 1 Bq; it would be clearer to give the activity of each source separately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported light yields are directly measured quantities with explicit calibration caveats, not derivations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not claim to derive its central results from a model; it presents a first experimental measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter. The alpha light yield of 0.9 ± 0.2 keV/MeV at 1 MeV is obtained by fitting a third-degree polynomial (EL = aEH^3 + bEH^2 + cEH) to alpha events observed between 2 and 4.5 MeV and evaluating it at 1 MeV. This is an empirical fit followed by evaluation/extrapolation, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction: the 1 MeV value is not one of the fitted coefficients and is not forced to equal the data by construction. The paper explicitly acknowledges the extrapolation-related uncertainties, including the 10–20% alpha energy-scale uncertainty and the absence of clear alpha calibration peaks, so the limitation is stated rather than hidden. The beta/gamma light yield comes from a separate linear fit to measured events down to low energy. Self-citations, notably [35] for the previous GaAs calorimeter result and [11] for ZnO comparisons, are used for context and performance comparison, not as load-bearing justification of the new measurement. No ansatz is smuggled in through citation, and no known result is renamed as a new organization. The main quantitative concern is a statistical/model-extrapolation risk rather than circularity: the factor-of-ten alpha-to-beta/gamma ratio depends on assuming the cubic form below the fitted alpha band. That is a robustness caveat, not a circular step. Under the stated rules, the derivation chain is self-contained, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central light-yield results rest entirely on fitted calibration coefficients and two untested energy-scale linearity assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha LY cubic coefficient a = -0.06(2)
    Fit to light-vs-heat scatter of alpha events using EL = a EH^3 + b EH^2 + c EH (Section 4.1). Directly determines alpha light yield.
  • alpha LY quadratic coefficient b = 0.54(1)
    Same alpha fit, Section 4.1.
  • alpha LY linear coefficient c = 0.4(2)
    Same alpha fit, Section 4.1.
  • beta/gamma LY slope a' = 0.069(1) keV/MeV
    Linear fit EL = a' EH to beta/gamma events (Section 4.1). Determines beta/gamma light yield at 1 MeV.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Heat-channel energy response is linear beyond the 60 keV calibration range up to ~4.5 MeV.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 when assigning energies to high-energy beta/gamma and alpha events; not directly calibrated above 60 keV.
  • domain assumption Alpha energy scale equals the gamma-calibrated heat scale.
    Section 4.1: no distinct alpha peaks are observed, so alpha energies are read from the gamma-calibrated heat axis with a stated 10-20% uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter: achievements and prospects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2FZVN6F

@misc{pith2026250707119,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First measurement of GaAs as a scintillating calorimeter: achievements and prospects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2FZVN6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07119}
}
abstract

In this paper we present the first measurement of a Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) crystal as a scintillating calorimeter with dual heat and light readout within the DAREDEVIL project. The experimental setup features a 4.3 g GaAs (GaAs-1) crystal, operated at approximately 10 mK coupled with a Neutron Transmutation Doped (NTD) thermal sensor for phonon detection and an auxiliary calorimeter for the detection of scintillation light. For the GaAs-1 crystal, a baseline resolution of 121$\pm$ 2 eV has been achieved. While, with a 3.5 g GaAs (GaAs-2) crystal an even better baseline resolution of 44.5 $\pm$ 0.8 eV was achieved. Alpha and X-ray calibration sources were used to study the scintillation light response to different types of interacting radiation. The GaAs crystal exhibits a strong particle discrimination capability based on the emitted scintillation light, featuring a light yield (LY) of 0.9 $\pm$ 0.2 keV/MeV for $\alpha$ induced events and 0.07 $\pm$ 0.01 keV/MeV for $\beta$/$\gamma$ events, both measured at 1~MeV. The unusual luminescence behavior, i.e. more light being produced under irradiation by $\alpha$ particles warrants further investigation, particularly due to its potential to enhance sensitivity to low-energy nuclear recoils from light dark matter scattering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. Search for new physics in low- energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure. Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):072006, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    SENSEI: First Direct- Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB.arXiv, 2312.13342, 12 2023

    Prakruth Adari et al. SENSEI: First Direct- Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB.arXiv, 2312.13342, 12 2023

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Agnese et al

    R. Agnese et al. First Dark Matter Constraints from a SuperCDMS Single-Charge Sensitive Detec- tor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(5):051301, 2018. [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 122, 069901 (2019)]

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    D. S. et al. Akerib. Results of a search for sub-gev dark matter using 2013 lux data.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:131301, Apr 2019

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Angloher and et al

    G. Angloher and et al. First observation of single photons in a cresst detector and new dark matter exclusion limits. Phys. Rev. D, 110:083038, Oct 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. Excess electronic recoil events in XENON1T. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):072004, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    SearchforNewPhysicsinElectronic Recoil Data from XENONnT

    E.Aprileetal. SearchforNewPhysicsinElectronic Recoil Data from XENONnT. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(16):161805, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Aprile and et al

    E. Aprile and et al. First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the xenonnt experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:041003, Jul 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Aprile and et al

    E. Aprile and et al. Search for light dark matter in low-energy ionization signals from xenonnt. 11 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    A cupid li2100moo4 scintillating bolometer tested in the cross underground facility

    A Armatol, E Armengaud, W Armstrong, C Augier, FT Avignone III, O Azzolini, IC Ban- dac, AS Barabash, G Bari, A Barresi, et al. A cupid li2100moo4 scintillating bolometer tested in the cross underground facility. Journal of instrumentation, 16(02):P02037, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Zno-based scin- tillating bolometers: new prospects to study double beta decay of 64zn

    A Armatol, B Broerman, L Dumoulin, A Giuliani, H Khalife, M Laubenstein, P Loaiza, P De Marcil- lac, S Marnieros, SS Nagorny, et al. Zno-based scin- tillating bolometers: new prospects to study double beta decay of 64zn. Journal of Instrumentation, 18(06):P06026, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Characteriza- tion of znse scintillating bolometers for double beta decay

    C Arnaboldi, S Capelli, O Cremonesi, L Gironi, M Pavan, G Pessina, and S Pirro. Characteriza- tion of znse scintillating bolometers for double beta decay. Astroparticle Physics, 34(6):344–353, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Arnaboldi, P

    C. Arnaboldi, P. Carniti, L. Cassina, C. Gotti, X. Liu, M. Maino, G. Pessina, C. Rosenfeld, and B.X. Zhu. A front-end electronic system for large arrays of bolometers. Journal of Instrumentation, 13(02):P02026, feb 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Arnaud et al

    Q. Arnaud et al. First germanium-based con- straints on sub-MeV Dark Matter with the 8 EDELWEISS experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125(14):141301, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Arnquist et al

    I. Arnquist et al. First Constraints from DAMIC- M on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Particles Interacting with Electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(17):171003, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    First array of en- riched znˆ 82 82 se bolometers to search for dou- ble beta decay.The European Physical Journal C, 76:1–10, 2016

    DR Artusa, A Balzoni, JW Beeman, Fabio Bellini, M Biassoni, C Brofferio, A Camacho, S Capelli, Laura Cardani, P Carniti, et al. First array of en- riched znˆ 82 82 se bolometers to search for dou- ble beta decay.The European Physical Journal C, 76:1–10, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Adrydilutionrefrigeratorforthetestofcuore components

    Marco Barucci,Valentina Martelli,and Grecia Ven- tura. Adrydilutionrefrigeratorforthetestofcuore components. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 157:541–549, 12 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Performances of a large mass znse bolometer to search for rare events.Journal of Instrumentation, 8(05):P05021, 2013

    JW Beeman, Fabio Bellini, Laura Cardani, N Casali, Ioan Dafinei, S Di Domizio, Fernando Ferroni, L Gironi, A Giuliani, S Nagorny, et al. Performances of a large mass znse bolometer to search for rare events.Journal of Instrumentation, 8(05):P05021, 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    Characterization of bolometric light detectors for rare event searches

    JW Beeman, Fabio Bellini, Nicola Casali, Laura Cardani, Ioan Dafinei, S Di Domizio, Fernando Ferroni, L Gironi, S Nagorny, Filippo Orio, et al. Characterization of bolometric light detectors for rare event searches. Journal of Instrumentation, 8(07):P07021, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*

    Julien Billard et al. Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*. Rept. Prog. Phys., 85(5):056201, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Scintillations from organic crystals: specific fluorescence and relative response to different radiations.Proceedings of the Physical Society

    John Betteley Birks. Scintillations from organic crystals: specific fluorescence and relative response to different radiations.Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 64(10):874, 1951

    1951

  14. [22]

    High resolution filtering and digitization system for cryogenic bolometric detectors

    Paolo Carniti, Claudio Gotti, and Gianluigi Pessina. High resolution filtering and digitization system for cryogenic bolometric detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1045:167658, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Search for Light Dark Matter- Electron Scatterings in the PandaX-II Experiment

    Chen Cheng et al. Search for Light Dark Matter- Electron Scatterings in the PandaX-II Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(21):211803, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Derenzo, E

    S. Derenzo, E. Bourret, S. Hanrahan, and G. Bizarri. Cryogenic Scintillation Properties of n-Type GaAs for the Direct Detection of MeV/c2 Dark Matter.J. Appl. Phys., 123(11):114501, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Scintillating Targets

    Stephen Derenzo, Rouven Essig, Andrea Massari, Adrían Soto, and Tien-Tien Yu. Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Scintillating Targets. Phys. Rev. D, 96(1):016026, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter with scintillating targets

    Stephen Derenzo, Rouven Essig, Andrea Massari, Adrián Soto, and Tien-Tien Yu. Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter with scintillating targets. Phys. Rev. D, 96:016026, Jul 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Sub-gev dark matter model

    Bhaskar Dutta, Sumit Ghosh, and Jason Ku- mar. Sub-gev dark matter model. Phys. Rev. D, 100:075028, Oct 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Snowmass2021 Cosmic Fron- tier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade

    Rouven Essig et al. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Fron- tier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade. InSnowmass 2021, 3 2022

    2021

  21. [29]

    Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter.Phys

    Rouven Essig, Jeremy Mardon, and Tomer Volan- sky. Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 85:076007, Apr 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    LightdarkmattersearchwithDarkSide-

    D.Franco. LightdarkmattersearchwithDarkSide-

  23. [31]

    Gatti and P

    E. Gatti and P. F. Manfredi. Processing the Signals From Solid State Detectors in Elementary Particle Physics. Riv. Nuovo Cim., 9N1:1–146, 1986

    1986

  24. [32]

    Sinead Griffin, Simon Knapen, Tongyan Lin, and Kathryn M. Zurek. Directional Detection of Light Dark Matter with Polar Materials.Phys. Rev. D, 98(11):115034, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Hall, Karsten Jedamzik, John March- Russell, and Stephen M

    Lawrence J. Hall, Karsten Jedamzik, John March- Russell, and Stephen M. West. Freeze-In Produc- tion of FIMP Dark Matter.JHEP, 03:080, 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    E. E. Haller, N. P. Palaio, M. Rodder, W. L. Hansen, and E. Kreysa. Ntd germanium: A novel material for low temperature bolometers. pages 21– 36, 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Helis, D. L., Melchiorre, A., Puiu, A., Benato, G., Carniti, P., Continenza, A., Di Marco, N., Ferella, A., Ferrari, C., Giannessi, F., Gotti, C., Monticone, E., Pagnanini, L., Pessina, G., Pirro, S., Profeta, G., Rajteri, M., Settembri, P., Shaikina, A., Tresca, C., and Trott...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Yonit Hochberg, Eric Kuflik, Tomer Volansky, and Jay G. Wacker. Mechanism for thermal relic dark matter of strongly interacting massive particles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:171301, Oct 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    Kaplan, Markus A

    David E. Kaplan, Markus A. Luty, and Kathryn M. Zurek. Asymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rev. D, 79:115016, Jun 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets

    Simon Knapen, Jonathan Kozaczuk, and Tongyan Lin. python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets. Phys. Rev. D, 105(1):015014, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets

    Simon Knapen, Jonathan Kozaczuk, and Tongyan Lin. python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets. Phys. Rev. D, 105:015014, Jan 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Simon Knapen, Tongyan Lin, Matt Pyle, and Kathryn M. Zurek. Detection of Light Dark Mat- 9 ter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials.Phys. Lett. B, 785:386–390, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    P. N. Luke. Voltage-assisted calorimetric ionization detector. J. Appl. Phys., 64(12):6858, 1988

    1988

  34. [42]

    Quenching factor for alpha particles in znse scintil- lating bolometers

    S Nagorny, L Cardani, N Casali, I Dafinei, L Pag- nanini, L Pattavina, S Pirro, and K Schaeffner. Quenching factor for alpha particles in znse scintil- lating bolometers. InIOP Conference Series: Ma- terials Science and Engineering, volume 169, page 012011. IOP Publishing, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    B. S. Neganov and V. N. Trofimov. Colorimetric method measuring ionizing radiation.Otkryt. Izo- bret., 146:215, 1985

    1985

  36. [44]

    Ciaran A. J. O’Hare. New definition of the neutrino floor for direct dark matter searches. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:251802, Dec 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    S Pirro, C Arnaboldi, JW Beeman, and G Pessina. Development of bolometric light detectors for dou- ble beta decay searches.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accel- erators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 559(2):361–363, 2006

    2006

  38. [46]

    Pirro and P

    S. Pirro and P. Mauskopf. Advances in Bolometer Technology for Fundamental Physics. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 67:161–181, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Scintillation in low-temperature par- ticle detectors

    Denys Poda. Scintillation in low-temperature par- ticle detectors. Physics, 3(3):473–535, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    M. Rossi. DarkSide-20k: Direct Dark Matter search. Nuovo Cim. C, 47(3):135, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    V.I. Tretyak. Semi-empirical calculation of quench- ing factors for ions in scintillators. Astroparticle Physics, 33(1):40–53, 2010

    2010

  42. [50]

    In57th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 6 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Vasiukov, F

    S. Vasiukov, F. Chiossi, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, F. Moretti, E. Bourret, and S. Derenzo. GaAs as a Bright Cryogenic Scintillator for the Detection of Low-Energy Electron Recoils From MeV/c2 Dark Matter. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 66(11):2333–2337, 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Zema et al

    V. Zema et al. Dark Matter–Electron Scattering Search Using Cryogenic Light Detectors. arXiv, 2402.01395, 2 2024

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.