Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Type IIB at eight derivatives: Five-Point Axio-Dilaton Couplings

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper derives the complete five-point, eight-derivative Type IIB effective action for gravitons and axio-dilatons, exact in the string coupling, and shows that even-scalar couplings are fixed by the modular form f0 while odd-scalar…

desk verdict A strong five-point extension of the Type IIB eight-derivative action that is almost certainly right but rests on one unshown one-loop ingredient—referee it, but ask for the derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07934 v2 pith:FZRDNJWB submitted 2025-07-10 hep-th

James Liu , Ruben Minasian , Raffaele Savelli , Andreas Schachner This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords TypeIIBstringtheoryeight-derivativeeffectiveactionfive-pointamplitudesaxio-dilatonSL(2Z)modularformsEisensteinseriespurespinorformalismM-theoryreduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives the complete Type IIB eight-derivative effective action in the gravity-plus-scalar sector at five points, exact in the string coupling. The action reproduces five-point tree-level and one-loop string amplitudes for gravitons, dilatons, and the RR axion after systematic subtraction of factorisation poles and non-linear completions of quartic terms. Couplings with an even number of scalars are governed by the Eisenstein series f0 and are neutral under SL(2,Z), while couplings with an odd number of scalars are maximally U(1)-violating and paired with f±1; this split fixes the non-perturbative completion. If correct, the result resolves earlier ambiguities in the modular completion, matches T-duality predictions in the NSNS sector, and supplies the dilaton couplings needed for Type IIA/M-theory comparisons.

What carries the argument

The machinery is an amplitude-to-action pipeline. Five-point closed-string amplitudes are built by KLT from pure-spinor open-string amplitudes at tree level and from the Green-Schwarz one-loop amplitude (A.17), including the trace-polarisation terms for external dilatons that earlier analyses omitted. Genuine five-point contact terms are isolated by subtracting both massless-exchange poles and the non-linear completions of the quartic action, and the surviving tensor structures are organized into t8t8/ϵ8ϵ8 contractions for even-scalar terms and into maximally U(1)-violating ϵ8ϵ8 structures for odd-scalar terms. The string-coupling dependence is then fixed by the Eisenstein-series modular forms f0 and f±1 of weight 3/2, whose weak-coupling expansions give the tree and one-loop coefficients aT and aL together with the D-instanton tower.

What would settle it

Independently recompute the one-loop five-point NSNS amplitude in a formulation that treats dilaton trace polarisations from the start, and compare the pole-subtracted $ϕ^{5}$ and $ϕ^{2}$$h^{3}$ contact terms with Table 2 and Eqs. (4.19)-(4.20); if the final two lines of Eq. (A.17) are incomplete, the tree/loop ratio in Eq. (3.13) will fail and the f±1 completion will not reproduce the amplitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the five-point, eight-derivative Type IIB effective action for gravitons and the axio-dilaton takes the form of Eqs. (4.14)-(4.20): a two-derivative seed plus quartic term with f0, and a five-point correction L(5) = α f0(L2 scalars + L4 scalars) + α f1(L3 scalars + L5 scalars) + h.c., with each Ln scalars an explicit index contraction that is either U(1)-neutral or maximally U(1)-violating. The paper argues that tree-level and one-loop amplitudes share identical kinematics, with only the modular-function coefficients differing (tree coefficient aT and one-loop coefficient aL, with a relative factor of -3 for odd-scalar terms), and that this structure is consistent with T-duality, with N = 2 supersymmetry in four dimensions, and with the circle reduction of M-theory eight-derivative couplings in Type IIA.

Load-bearing premise

The trace-polarisation terms appended to the one-loop five-point amplitude in Eq. (A.17) are complete and correctly normalised; if they are not, every one-loop coupling and every odd-dilaton five-point coupling in Tables 2 and 3 would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The five-point action is exact in gs, so expanding f0 and f±1 at weak coupling gives both the tree-level and one-loop couplings and the infinite tower of D-instanton corrections.
  • Because tree-level and one-loop five-point kinematics coincide, the T-duality-verified tree-level NSNS result determines the one-loop NSNS couplings without further computation.
  • The mixed NSNS/RR couplings, which vanish in the pure NSNS sector, fix the SL(2,Z) completion and rule out alternative modular completions considered earlier.
  • In Type IIA, the one-loop R(∇∇ϕ)(∇F2)^2 coupling matches the circle reduction of the eleven-dimensional t8t8 R^4 term, tying the Type IIB result to M-theory.
  • The dilaton-curvature coefficients c2 = 3/4 and c3 = -1/24 satisfy the N = 2 Calabi-Yau constraint 3c2 + 6c3 - 2 = 0, so the string-amplitude result is consistent with four-dimensional supersymmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to go to six points, where the same U(1)-charge bound predicts maximally U(1)-violating couplings paired with f±2; the method used here should yield their kinematics from the same amplitudes with two extra insertions.
  • The paper's failure of the naive 12D F-theory lift at five points suggests that a successful twelve-dimensional formulation would need to include the Schwinger KK-mode insertions S(5,1,1), S(5,2,0), and S(5,0,2) that a zero-mode torus reduction misses.
  • Because the string-frame dilaton and Ricci terms can be traded but not simultaneously removed once RR fields are included, future string-frame computations should state their field-redefinition basis explicitly; otherwise apparently conflicting α'^3 couplings may actually be equivalent.
  • Reducing the new five-point couplings on a Calabi-Yau threefold and comparing the resulting four-dimensional higher-derivative terms against an independent N = 2 superspace computation could verify the f±1 assignments without computing one-loop amplitudes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the five-point, eight-derivative effective action of Type IIB string theory in the graviton-axio-dilaton sector, claimed to be exact in the string coupling. The strategy has three parts: (i) from the known tree-level and one-loop five-point NSNS amplitudes, Eqs. (A.14) and (A.17), the authors subtract factorisation poles and the non-linear completions of the quartic couplings (2.5)/(3.1) to isolate genuine five-point contact terms, summarized in Tables 1 and 2; (ii) they compute tree-level two-axion mixed NSNS/RR amplitudes (Sec. 4.1) to fix kinematical structures that vanish in the pure NSNS sector; (iii) they organize the couplings by U(1) R-charge, assigning the modular function f0 to even-scalar couplings and the charge-plus-or-minus-1 functions f±1 to the maximally U(1)-violating odd-scalar couplings, which fixes the full gs and D-instanton dependence. The final action is Eqs. (4.14)-(4.20). The paper also clarifies the relation between Einstein-frame and string-frame dilaton couplings in the presence of RR fields, and checks part of the Type IIA sector against the circle reduction of the 11D t8t8R4 coupling (Sec. 5.2).

Significance. If the result is correct, it is a substantial step forward: it provides the first complete five-point eight-derivative scalar-gravity action in Type IIB, exact in gs, fixes the maximally U(1)-violating kinematics of the odd-scalar sector, and demonstrates how mixed-sector amplitudes resolve the modular-completion ambiguities noted in earlier work. The paper has explicit strengths: (a) the mixed-sector extraction in Sec. 4.1 is concrete and yields non-trivial index structures; (b) the Calabi-Yau reduction check in Sec. 3.3 is quantitative, with coefficients c2 = 3/4, c3 = -1/24 satisfying the N=2 constraint (3.11); (c) the M-theory reduction check in Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (5.22)-(5.28), is detailed and supported by explicit kinematic identities; (d) the treatment of field-redefinition ambiguities, Eqs. (3.7)-(3.9) and (5.11)-(5.15), is careful and instructive; and (e) App. B explicitly demonstrates that the naive 12D uplift fails already at five points, a useful negative result.

major comments (4)
  1. [App. A.1, Eq. (A.17)] The one-loop five-point amplitude is the paper's only source of one-loop coupling data, but the new trace-polarisation terms in the final two lines are asserted without derivation, and the text itself states that these terms are 'crucial' and that they 'were omitted in earlier analyses, including [67,68]'. These terms control the dilaton trace-polarisation contributions and hence determine every one-loop dilaton-containing contact term in Tables 1 and 2 (the even-dilaton rows phi2h3 and phi4h as well as the odd-dilaton rows phi3h2 and phi5), the tree/loop ratio -3 in Eq. (3.13) that fixes the normalization of f±1 in (3.14) and (4.16), and, through modular completion, the one-loop even- and odd-scalar RR couplings in (4.16)-(4.20). A missing term or a wrong normalization in these lines would corrupt all of these results. Please provide a derivation of the trace terms (for example, from the Green-Schwarz or pure spinor one-loop computation with trace polarisations) or an independent check, such as a supersymmetry or factorisation constraint, that fixes them uniquely.
  2. [App. A.2, footnote 14] The paper states that the pole subtraction converting (A.14) and (A.17) into the contact terms of Table 1 was 'not done explicitly, but rather inferred via indirect arguments', by taking differences of the tree-level and one-loop expressions. This inference is the central methodological step that separates genuine five-point contact terms from factorisation contributions, yet the subtracted channels, the finite parts of the exchange diagrams, and the precise role of the quartic subtraction action (3.1) are not exhibited for any amplitude. As written, the extraction in Tables 1 and 2 is not reproducible, and the result is sensitive to the treatment of the finite pieces and to the choice of subtraction action. The subtraction should be shown explicitly for at least one representative amplitude (for example, h3phi2), including the relative normalization of the tree-level and one-loop subtractions.
  3. [Sec. 3.2] The claimed match with the T-duality-based action (3.4) is announced rather than demonstrated: the text says only that 'we have verified that the quintic effective action indeed matches (3.4)', without presenting the Weyl rescaling from the string frame, the field redefinitions (including the on-shell substitutions (3.5)), or the resulting comparison with the rows of Table 2. Since the abstract lists T-duality consistency at tree level in the NSNS sector as one of the main results of the paper, this verification must be shown in detail; otherwise it cannot serve as an independent check of the amplitude-derived couplings, nor can the claim in Sec. 3.2 that the tree-level match 'is sufficient to uniquely determine the one-loop contributions' be evaluated.
  4. [Sec. 4, opening paragraph] The claim that 'it is sufficient to compute a subset of tree-level amplitudes with RR external states to determine the mixed-sector contributions' is a structural assumption of the RR-sector completion. The equality of tree-level and one-loop kinematics is verified in the pure NSNS sector only after the one-loop extraction that already relies on (A.17) and on the inferred subtraction of footnote 14, and in the mixed sector no one-loop amplitude is computed at all. Consequently, the one-loop coefficients of the RR-sector terms in (4.16)-(4.20) are fixed by the modular ansatz (2.14) together with the NSNS tree/loop ratio -3, and they inherit the uncertainty of the one-loop NSNS input. Please state explicitly which independent evidence fixes the one-loop normalisation of L3 scalars and L5 scalars in (4.19)-(4.20) beyond the modular-form ansatz.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (4.17)-(4.20)] The index-contraction notation (delta P P, delta delta P.P, (nabla P)(delta delta P.P), h.c.) is not defined in the text; since these equations are the main result of the paper, a short glossary or the expanded form of at least one operator would greatly improve readability.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.12)] The coefficient 61/1848 in the alternative form of L_phi4h appears without derivation; given the section's emphasis on the two-parameter family of equivalent forms, the origin of this coefficient should be indicated.
  3. [Eqs. (2.9) and (A.33)] The higher tensor t18 is used without a definition in this paper; the authors should give its defining property or a precise equation reference to [18].
  4. [Sec. 5.2] Reference [36] is cited as the source of the IIA R(nabla nabla phi)(nabla F2)^2 coupling, but given the title of that reference ('a mismatch'), the authors should add a sentence clarifying the relation between the present agreement with M-theory reduction and the discrepancy reported there.
  5. [Table 1 and Eq. (4.10)] The label '5 pts' is used without a definition; the caption and the surrounding text should state that it indicates contributions arising from inserting a graviton into the four-point structures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the five-point couplings are extracted from explicit string amplitudes and checked against independent T-duality, N=2, and M-theory constraints.

full rationale

The central quantities, Table 2 and Eqs. (4.14)-(4.20), are obtained by substituting NSNS/RR polarisations into the five-point amplitudes (A.14) and (A.17) and subtracting factorised four-point exchanges and non-linear completions of the quartic action (2.5)/(3.1). These inputs are independent of the five-point output: the quartic action and the Eisenstein series f0, f±1 are established separately from R4 and D-instanton results, and the computed tree/loop ratio -3 for odd-dilaton terms is an output that matches the known expansion (2.14) rather than a fitted parameter. Cross-checks invoke T-duality uniqueness [14,15] and 4D N=2 constraints [32], both external. The few self-citations ([18] for the t18 structure, [26] for the O1 normalisation) are either not used in the scalar-graviton sector or concern lower-point input that is also traceable to [7], so they are not load-bearing for the claimed five-point result. Two admitted limitations should be recorded as correctness risks rather than circularity: the trace-polarisation terms added to the one-loop amplitude (A.17) ('These contributions are crucial when analysing amplitudes that include dilatons. Notably, such terms were omitted in earlier analyses') are not independently proven, and footnote 14 states the pole subtraction 'was not done explicitly, but rather inferred via indirect arguments.' A wrong or incomplete term there would change Table 2, but that is an unverified input, not a derivation that reduces to its own input. No equation in the paper sets the five-point result equal to a fitted or predefined quantity by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result adds no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on established structures of Type IIB string theory, the cited amplitude database, and the earlier quartic action.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The tree and one-loop four-point NSNS amplitudes (A.10) and (A.12) are correct and share the same t8 kinematic structure; they determine the quartic action used for subtraction.
    Used throughout Sec. 3 and App. A as the baseline for pole subtraction; if incomplete, the extracted five-point contact terms shift.
  • domain assumption The one-loop five-point amplitude (A.17), with the added trace-polarisation terms, is the complete Type II NSNS five-point amplitude at order (α')^3.
    Quoted from [67] plus new trace terms; underpins all one-loop five-point scalar results.
  • domain assumption The modular functions f_w in (2.10) with the expansions (2.12)-(2.14) are the unique SL(2,Z) completions with the given perturbative coefficients.
    Used to promote tree+loop coefficients to exact-in-gs couplings in Sec. 4.2; relies on uniqueness of modular forms, cited to [21,22].
  • domain assumption The maximal U(1) charge of a P-point coupling is 2(P-4) [27], so five-point terms with two scalars are neutral and those with one, three, or five scalars are maximally violating.
    Used to assign f0 vs f±1 and to forbid P^2 R^3 kinematics in Sec. 2.2 and 3.3.
  • domain assumption KLT relations and the pure spinor amplitudes from [60] correctly give the mixed two-RR-three-NSNS amplitudes used in Sec. 4.1.
    The RR-sector completion in Sec. 4 depends directly on these open-string amplitudes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Type IIB at eight derivatives: Five-Point Axio-Dilaton Couplings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FZRDNJWB

@misc{pith2026250707934,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Type IIB at eight derivatives: Five-Point Axio-Dilaton Couplings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FZRDNJWB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07934}
}
abstract

We study the Type IIB eight-derivative effective Lagrangian beyond the quartic level, focusing on interactions involving gravitons and axio-dilatons. We show how to translate five-point scattering amplitudes into genuine five-point contact terms and extract all perturbative contributions to the effective action. Our result is consistent with T-duality predictions at tree level in the NSNS sector. We find that couplings with an even/odd number of scalars are neutral/charged under $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, and use this feature to deduce their non-perturbative completion. The mixed NSNS/RR structures that cannot be deduced from the pure NSNS sector allow us to unambiguously fix the kinematics, which turns out to be the same for tree level and one loop. In Type IIA, these structures are essential for establishing agreement of string-theoretic corrections with the circle reduction of M-theory higher-derivative couplings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07934 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The four-graviton amplitude at closed string tree level, as given in Eq. (A.10), receives contributions from both contact and exchange diagrams. The blue diagram on the left represents the exchange of an intermediate graviton, which gives rise to singular terms in the amplitude. To isolate the four-point contact interaction, one must subtract the full contribution of the diagram on the left, including both its singu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The five-graviton amplitude obtained from (A.14) at closed-string tree level receives contributions from both exchange and contact diagrams. The blue diagram on the left shows the exchange of an intermediate massless graviton h leading to singular terms in the amplitude. To isolate the five-point contact interaction, the full contribution from exchange diagrams like the one on the left must be subtracted, including … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. h 3ϕ 2 amplitude. Diagrams in blue indicate poles. h1 ϕ1 ϕ4 ϕ2 ϕ3 ϕ ϕ3 ϕ1 ϕ4 ϕ2 h1 h ϕ1 ϕ2 ϕ4 ϕ3 h1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: hϕ4 amplitude. Diagrams in blue indicate poles. h4 h5 h1 h2 ϕ1 h4 h5 ϕ3 ϕ2 ϕ1 ϕ4 ϕ5 ϕ3 ϕ2 ϕ1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: h 4ϕ, h 2ϕ 3 , ϕ 5 amplitudes. No pole subtraction necessary. where ϵ9ϵ9H2R3 is defined in Eq. (A.31). Finally, while our focus here has been on the NSNS sector, the complete tree-level quartic effective action, including RR contributions, has been derived using pure s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: h 2ϕχ2 amplitude. In contrast to the three dilaton amplitude in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effective Action in M-Theory: $(DF)^4$ Superinvariants

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A local supersymmetry analysis reduces the 24 independent (DF)^4 terms in the M-theory eight-derivative action to 10 free parameters, consistent with scattering amplitude results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String , Nucl. Phys. B 291 (1987) 41–89

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    D. J. Gross and E. Witten, Superstring Modifications of Einstein ’s Equations, Nucl. Phys. B277 (1986) 1

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Peeters, P

    K. Peeters, P. Vanhove and A. Westerberg, Chiral splitting and world sheet gravitinos in higher derivative string amplitudes , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2699–2716, [hep-th/0112157]

    arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    J. T. Liu and R. Minasian, Higher-derivative couplings in string theory: dualities and the B-field, Nucl. Phys. B874 (2013) 413–470, [ 1304.3137]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    J. T. Liu and R. Minasian, Higher-derivative couplings in string theory: five-point contact terms, 1912.10974

    arXiv 1912

  6. [6]

    Policastro and D

    G. Policastro and D. Tsimpis, R4, purified, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 4753–4780, [hep-th/0603165]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    A note on the quartic effective action of type IIB superstring

    G. Policastro and D. Tsimpis, A Note on the quartic effective action of type IIB superstring , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 125001, [ 0812.3138]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    P. S. Howe and P. C. West, The Complete N=2, D=10 Supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 238 (1984) 181–220

    1984

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    de Haro, A

    S. de Haro, A. Sinkovics and K. Skenderis, On a supersymmetric completion of the R4 term in 2B supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 084010, [ hep-th/0210080]

    2003 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M. B. Green and C. Stahn, D3-branes on the Coulomb branch and instantons , JHEP 09 (2003) 052, [ hep-th/0308061]

    2003 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Rajaraman, On the supersymmetric completion of the R4 term in M-theory , Phys

    A. Rajaraman, On the supersymmetric completion of the R4 term in M-theory , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 085018, [ hep-th/0512333]

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    M. F. Paulos, Higher derivative terms including the Ramond-Ramond five-form , JHEP 10 (2008) 047, [ 0804.0763]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    J. a. F. Melo and J. E. Santos, Stringy corrections to the entropy of electrically charged supersymmetric black holes with AdS5 × S5 asymptotics, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 066008, [2007.06582]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M. R. Garousi, Effective action of type II superstring theories at order α′3: NS-NS couplings , JHEP 02 (2021) 157, [ 2011.02753]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. R. Garousi, On NS-NS couplings at order α′3, Nucl. Phys. B 971 (2021) 115510, [2012.15091]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Wulff, Completing R4 using O(d, d), 2111.00018

    L. Wulff, Completing R4 using O(d, d), 2111.00018

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Wulff, Tree-level R4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms , JHEP 09 (2024) 078, [2406.15240]

    L. Wulff, Tree-level R4 correction from O(d, d): NS-NS five-point terms , JHEP 09 (2024) 078, [2406.15240]. – 40 –

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. T. Liu, R. Minasian, R. Savelli and A. Schachner, Type IIB at eight derivatives: insights from Superstrings, Superfields and Superparticles , JHEP 08 (2022) 267, [ 2205.11530]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kehagias and H

    A. Kehagias and H. Partouche, On the exact quartic effective action for the type IIB superstring, Phys. Lett. B 422 (1998) 109–116, [ hep-th/9710023]

    1998 arXiv

  12. [20]

    R. H. Boels, Maximal R-symmetry violating amplitudes in type IIB superstring theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 081602, [ 1204.4208]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    M. B. Green and C. Wen, Modular Forms and SL(2, Z)-covariance of type IIB superstring theory, JHEP 06 (2019) 087, [ 1904.13394]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle and P. Vanhove, One loop in eleven-dimensions , Phys. Lett. B409 (1997) 177–184, [ hep-th/9706175]

    1997 arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Supersymmetrical Dual String Theory. 3. Loops and Renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 441–460

    1982

  16. [24]

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, Effects of D instantons , Nucl. Phys. B 498 (1997) 195–227, [hep-th/9701093]

    1997 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. H. Schwarz, Superstring Theory, Phys. Rept. 89 (1982) 223–322

    1982

  18. [26]

    Minasian, T

    R. Minasian, T. G. Pugh and R. Savelli, F-theory at order α′3, JHEP 10 (2015) 050, [1506.06756]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle and H.-h. Kwon, Sixteen fermion and related terms in M theory on T 2, Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 149–161, [ hep-th/9710151]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    M. B. Green, K. Peeters and C. Stahn, Superfield integrals in high dimensions , JHEP 08 (2005) 093, [ hep-th/0506161]

    2005 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Peeters, J

    K. Peeters, J. Plefka and S. Stern, Higher-derivative gauge field terms in the M-theory action, JHEP 08 (2005) 095, [ hep-th/0507178]

    2005 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. T. Grisaru and D. Zanon, σ Model Superstring Corrections to the Einstein-hilbert Action , Phys. Lett. B 177 (1986) 347–351

    1986

  23. [31]

    M. D. Freeman, C. N. Pope, M. F. Sohnius and K. S. Stelle, Higher Order σ Model Counterterms and the Effective Action for Superstrings , Phys. Lett. B178 (1986) 199–204

    1986

  24. [32]

    Bonetti and M

    F. Bonetti and M. Weissenbacher, The Euler characteristic correction to the K¨ ahler potential — revisited, JHEP 01 (2017) 003, [ 1608.01300]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian and K. Narain, R4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 571–588, [ hep-th/9707013]

    1997 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack and J. Louis, Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials , JHEP 06 (2002) 060, [ hep-th/0204254]

    2002 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kehagias and H

    A. Kehagias and H. Partouche, D instanton corrections as (p,q) string effects and nonrenormalization theorems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13 (1998) 5075–5092, [ hep-th/9712164]

    1998 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Aggarwal, S

    A. Aggarwal, S. Chakrabarti, S. W. Hsia, A. R. Kamal and L. Wulff, One loop in D = 11 vs D = 10: a mismatch , 2506.16391

  29. [37]

    A. A. Tseytlin, On sigma model RG flow, ‘central charge’ action and Perelman ’s entropy , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 064024, [ hep-th/0612296]

    2007 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions , Nucl

    E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 85–126, [hep-th/9503124]. – 41 –

    1995 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bergshoeff, C

    E. Bergshoeff, C. M. Hull and T. Ortin, Duality in the type II superstring effective action , Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 547–578, [ hep-th/9504081]

    1995 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. A. Tseytlin, On dilaton dependence of type II superstring action , Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) L81–L85, [ hep-th/9601109]

    1996 arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle and H. H. Kwon, Light cone quantum mechanics of the eleven-dimensional superparticle, JHEP 08 (1999) 012, [ hep-th/9907155]

    1999 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kawai, D

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen and S. H. H. Tye, A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings , Nucl. Phys. B 269 (1986) 1–23

    1986

  35. [43]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Supersymmetrical Dual String Theory. 2. Vertices and Trees, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 252–268

    1982

  36. [44]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, The Low-energy expansion of the one loop type II superstring amplitude, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 104011, [ hep-th/9910056]

    2000 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kitazawa, Effective Lagrangian for Open Superstring From Five Point Function , Nucl

    Y. Kitazawa, Effective Lagrangian for Open Superstring From Five Point Function , Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 599–608

    1987

  38. [46]

    Medina, F

    R. Medina, F. T. Brandt and F. R. Machado, The Open superstring five point amplitude revisited, JHEP 07 (2002) 071, [ hep-th/0208121]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    L. A. Barreiro and R. Medina, 5-field terms in the open superstring effective action , JHEP 03 (2005) 055, [ hep-th/0503182]

    2005 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Stieberger and T

    S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, Multi-Gluon Scattering in Open Superstring Theory , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 126007, [ hep-th/0609175]

    2006 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Berkovits, Super Poincare covariant quantization of the superstring , JHEP 04 (2000) 018, [hep-th/0001035]

    N. Berkovits, Super Poincare covariant quantization of the superstring , JHEP 04 (2000) 018, [hep-th/0001035]

    2000 arXiv

  42. [50]

    C. R. Mafra, Simplifying the Tree-level Superstring Massless Five-point Amplitude , JHEP 01 (2010) 007, [ 0909.5206]

    2010 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, Complete N-Point Superstring Disk Amplitude I. Pure Spinor Computation , Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 419–460, [ 1106.2645]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, Complete N-Point Superstring Disk Amplitude II. Amplitude and Hypergeometric Function Structure , Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 461–513, [1106.2646]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, The Structure of n-Point One-Loop Open Superstring Amplitudes, JHEP 08 (2014) 099, [ 1203.6215]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Towards the n-point one-loop superstring amplitude. Part I. Pure spinors and superfield kinematics , JHEP 08 (2019) 090, [ 1812.10969]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Towards the n-point one-loop superstring amplitude. Part II. Worldsheet functions and their duality to kinematics , JHEP 08 (2019) 091, [ 1812.10970]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Towards the n-point one-loop superstring amplitude. Part III. One-loop correlators and their double-copy structure , JHEP 08 (2019) 092, [1812.10971]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Schlotterer and S

    O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, Motivic Multiple Zeta Values and Superstring Amplitudes , J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 475401, [ 1205.1516]

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    R. H. Boels, On the field theory expansion of superstring five point amplitudes , Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 215–233, [ 1304.7918]. – 42 –

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. B. Green, C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Multiparticle one-loop amplitudes and S-duality in closed superstring theory , JHEP 10 (2013) 188, [ 1307.3534]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Pss: From pure spinor superspace to components

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer, S. Stieberger and D. Tsimpis, “Pss: From pure spinor superspace to components.” https://tools.aei.mpg.de/purespinor/pss.html, 2010

    2010

  53. [61]

    C. R. Mafra and C. Stahn, The One-loop Open Superstring Massless Five-point Amplitude with the Non-Minimal Pure Spinor Formalism , JHEP 03 (2009) 126, [ 0902.1539]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [62]

    P. H. Frampton, P. Moxhay and Y. J. Ng, One Loop Finiteness in O(3,2) Open Superstring Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2107

    1985

  55. [63]

    P. H. Frampton, P. Moxhay and Y. J. Ng, Explicit Evaluation of Pentagon Diagram for Open Superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 599–616

    1986

  56. [64]

    P. H. Frampton, Y. Kikuchi and Y. J. Ng, Modular Invariance in Closed Superstrings , Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 262–266

    1986

  57. [65]

    C. S. Lam and D.-X. Li, Modular Invariance and One Loop Finiteness of Five Point Amplitudes in Type II and Heterotic String Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2575

    1986

  58. [66]

    J. L. Montag, The one loop five graviton scattering amplitude and its low-energy limit , Nucl. Phys. B 393 (1993) 337–360, [ hep-th/9205097]

    1993 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. M. Richards, The One-Loop Five-Graviton Amplitude and the Effective Action , JHEP 10 (2008) 042, [ 0807.2421]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [68]

    D. M. Richards, The One-Loop H 2R3 and H 2(∇H)2R Terms in the Effective Action , JHEP 10 (2008) 043, [ 0807.3453]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Tree-level amplitudes from the pure spinor superstring , Phys. Rept. 1020 (2023) 1–162, [ 2210.14241]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Berkovits and C

    N. Berkovits and C. R. Mafra, Equivalence of two-loop superstring amplitudes in the pure spinor and RNS formalisms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 011602, [ hep-th/0509234]

    2006 arXiv

  63. [71]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, D instantons, strings and M theory , Phys. Lett. B 408 (1997) 122–134, [hep-th/9704145]. – 43 –

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.