Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that embedding the Standard Model in a quotient gauge group with even enlarged theta periodicity makes CP select $\bar{\theta}=0$ rather than the excluded $\bar{\theta}=\pi$.

desk verdict A genuinely useful idea for forcing theta=0 via enlarged periodicity, but the paper's only explicit model is anomalous and has chiral exotics, so the proof-of-concept fails as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10680 v1 pith:FSM2Y3C3 submitted 2025-07-14 hep-ph hep-th

Luca Vecchi This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords StrongCPproblemQCDthetaanglesymmetryparityfractionalinstantonslineoperatorsgaugegroupglobalstructuregrandunification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

CP or parity invariance by itself lets the QCD topological angle sit at either $\bar{\theta}=0$ or $\bar{\theta}=\pi$, and only the first value is experimentally allowed; the paper argues that this ambiguity is a hidden 'quality problem' for CP-based solutions to the Strong CP problem. The central proposal is that embedding the Standard Model in a quotient gauge group of the form $G_1 \times G_2 \times \cdots / \mathbb{Z}_2$, chosen so that the QCD factor has an even enlarged periodicity $2\pi p$, forces CP to select $\bar{\theta}=0$ (or $2\pi$, which is indistinguishable from $0$) rather than the excluded $\pi$. The paper identifies a broad class of groups satisfying this requirement and exhibits an illustrative example, $[SU(6) \times USp(4) \times USp(4)]/\mathbb{Z}_2$, with fractional-instanton charge vector $(1/2,1,1)$. A sympathetic reader would care because, if the argument is right, viable CP- or P-based strong CP solutions must come from a unified gauge group of this class, and the UV-agnostic advantage of the CP approach is restored.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fractional-instanton charge vector $\vec q$, whose entries $q_a$ are the minimal topological charges of the factors $G_a/\mathbb{Z}_2$ (listed for SO, SU, Spin, and USp groups in Table I). Because the quotient $\mathbb{Z}_2$ is shared by all factors, the fractional instantons of the different factors are linked, so the allowed topological charges are $\vec Q = \vec n + m \vec q$ rather than independent integers. The load-bearing condition is (7): no integer vector $\vec k = (1, k_2, \dots)$ satisfies $\vec k \cdot \vec q \in \mathbb{Z}$. When this holds, a $2\pi$ shift of the $\theta$ angle of the QCD-containing factor cannot be compensated by shifts of the other angles, so the physical periodicity of that angle is enlarged to $2\pi p$ with $p$ even, and CP invariance forces the angle to be $0$ or $2\pi$ instead of $0$ or $\pi$.

What would settle it

Attempt a full model based on $[SU(6) \times USp(4) \times USp(4)]/\mathbb{Z}_2$ (or any group in the class) and check three things: whether the scalar content can produce the claimed symmetry-breaking pattern, whether all exotic fermions acquire vector-like masses, and whether the one-loop threshold corrections to $\bar{\theta}$ stay below about $10^{-10}$. If every candidate embedding fails on at least one of these checks, the mechanism would not yield a viable strong CP solution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the dichotomy $\bar{\theta}=0$ versus $\bar{\theta}=\pi$ is not an unavoidable consequence of CP or P invariance but an artifact of assuming the usual $2\pi$ periodicity of the QCD $\theta$ angle. In a gauge theory of the form (4), fractional instantons of the different factors are correlated: the topological charges take the form $\vec Q = \vec n + m \vec q$, and a $2\pi$ shift of the $\theta$ angle of one factor can be compensated by shifts of the others precisely when $\vec k \cdot \vec q$ is an integer. The paper shows that if the group is chosen so that condition (7) holds, the $\theta$ angle of the factor containing QCD has period $4\pi$ rather than $2\pi$; imposing CP then forces $\bar{\theta}_1=0$ or $2\pi$, and matching to the Standard Model gives $\bar{\theta} \approx \bar{\theta}_1$, effectively zero. It further shows that the Standard Model's own quotient structure does not enlarge the QCD period, and that the unification groups proposed so far — SU(5), Spin(10), Pati-Salam, trinification, and $SU(6) \times SU(2)$ — fail condition (7), while the illustrative $[SU(6) \times USp(4) \times USp(4)]/\mathbb{Z}_2$ model satisfies it.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands only if a complete model can actually be built on a gauge group of this class: the scalar sectors must break the unified group to the Standard Model with the stated branchings, every exotic fermion must become vector-like and heavy, anomalies must cancel, and spontaneous CP breaking must keep radiative corrections to the strong CP angle below about $10^{-10}$, none of which the paper constructs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any complete CP- or P-based solution to the Strong CP problem must embed the Standard Model in a gauge group satisfying condition (7); the standard unification groups SU(5), Spin(10), Pati-Salam, trinification, and SU(6) × SU(2)/Z2 fail this test as they stand.
  • In the allowed class, the low-energy QCD theta angle is forced to be 0 or 2π, and since 2π is physically identical to 0 in low-energy QCD, the experimentally excluded value π never appears.
  • No new infrared degrees of freedom are needed: the selection is encoded in the global form of the UV gauge group, and low-energy physics sees only a theta angle indistinguishable from zero, up to tiny effects from very heavy colored topological defects.
  • The flavor structure and the scalar sector that breaks the unified group down to the Standard Model must be engineered to keep radiative corrections to theta below about $10^{-10}$, a model-dependent task the paper leaves to future work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result can be used as a cheap model-building filter: before constructing a full CP-breaking sector, compute the fractional-instanton charge vector of the candidate unified group and check condition (7); this algebraic input rules out or selects embeddings quickly.
  • The same enlarged-periodicity logic should apply to other discrete quotients, not just $\mathbb{Z}_2$; a systematic scan over $G/\mathbb{Z}_p$ with $p$ even might reveal simpler or more realistic embeddings than the illustrative one.
  • A lattice or semiclassical study of an $SU(N)/\mathbb{Z}_p$ gauge theory could test the premise directly: CP-invariant vacua should sit at $\theta = 0$ or $\theta = \pi p$ mod $2\pi p$, with all $2\pi$-shifted copies equivalent only when the shift is $p$-fold.
  • If the specific $[SU(6) \times USp(4) \times USp(4)]/\mathbb{Z}_2$ example fails on anomaly cancellation or exotic-fermion masses, the paper's core selection mechanism may still survive in another group of the same class; condition (7) is the durable part.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper argues that exact CP or P symmetry alone, while forcing the QCD topological angle to a CP-conserving value, leaves the two-fold ambiguity theta_bar = 0 or pi, and because theta_bar = pi is experimentally excluded, CP alone cannot unambiguously solve the strong CP problem. The author proposes to resolve the ambiguity by embedding the Standard Model in a gauge group whose QCD theta angle has an enlarged periodicity 2*pi*p with even p, so that CP invariance forces theta_bar to a multiple of 2*pi. Section II derives a general condition (7) on the fractional instanton charge vector of product gauge groups, surveys known unified groups, and offers the group (8), [SU(6) x USp(4) x USp(4)]/Z2 with fermions (6,4,1) + (6,1,4), as a proof of concept. Section III discusses model-dependent radiative issues, and an appendix defends the standard theta = 0 or pi quantization against a recent paper.

Significance. If a valid embedding existed, the paper would supply a genuinely new model-building criterion for strong CP solutions and would sharpen the 'quality problem' for spontaneous CP/P solutions. The derivation of Eqs. (5)-(7) is transparent, uses established results on fractional instantons and line operators, contains no numerical fitting, and yields a concrete, falsifiable condition on the global form of unified gauge groups. However, the only explicit embedding offered is anomalous and does not reduce to the claimed vector-like spectrum, so the paper currently establishes a necessary condition and a promising mechanism but not an actual existence proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, model (8)] The fermion content (6,4,1) + (6,1,4) has a nonvanishing SU(6) gauge anomaly: the two left-handed fundamental 6's give a cubic anomaly coefficient 2, and no additional fields are specified to cancel it. As stated, the gauge theory (8) is therefore inconsistent, so it cannot serve as the claimed proof of concept.
  2. [Section II, after Eq. (8)] The claim that the (6,1,1) states are vector-like and can acquire large masses is incorrect. Under SU(6) -> SU(4) x SU(2)' with 6 = (4,1) + (1,2), each (6,1,1) contains a (4,1) of SU(4) with no accompanying (anti-4,1); because the 6 of SU(6) is complex, no gauge-invariant vector-like mass term can be written using only the displayed fields. The stated reduction to a Pati-Salam chiral spectrum with vector-like exotics is therefore not achieved.
  3. [Section III, Outlook] Because the only explicit example is anomalous and its exotics are chiral under the low-energy group, the assertion that 'robust QFT solutions to the Strong CP problem based on spontaneous CP (or P) violation can be constructed' is an unproven existence claim. The paper should either provide a corrected anomaly-free embedding with the claimed vector-like exotics, or explicitly state that the existence of a realistic model in the class defined by (4) and (7) is an open conjecture; as it stands, the central phenomenological conclusion rests on a hypothetical rather than demonstrated example.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table I] The row labeled 'Spin(4 + N)' appears to be a typo for 'Spin(4N)', since the text immediately below the table refers to the center of Spin(4N).
  2. [Section II, model (8)] The notation '(6,1,1) + (6,1,1)' for two copies of the same complex representation is not a vector-like pair; the text should either explain how a mass term is generated or use the conjugate representation.
  3. [Section II, after Eq. (9)] The relation theta_bar ≈ theta_bar_1 should be stated more carefully: threshold corrections from integrating out the heavy exotics and scalars can shift the low-energy QCD angle, and the paper does not quantify these corrections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the enlarged-periodicity selection of θ=0 follows from the gauge-group choice, and the sole self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The paper's conditional claim—that in a CP- or P-invariant gauge theory with enlarged topological-angle periodicity 2πp and even p, the QCD theta angle is forced to 0 mod 2π—follows from the spurion transformation θ→−θ and the periodicity identification θ∼θ+2πp; equation (3) is a direct consequence of these two definitions, not an input. The condition (7) is introduced as a design criterion for gauge groups, and the example (8) is an explicit construction satisfying it; concluding that CP forces θ1=0 or 2π in that example simply applies the general lemma to the computed charge vector q=(1/2,1,1). The matching relation (9) is an assumption about UV/IR matching, not a fitted parameter. The only self-citation is to the author's earlier work [7] (Valenti & Vecchi) as one entry in a list of CP/P-based strong-CP solutions; it is not used as load-bearing evidence at any step. Potential model-building issues in the illustration (e.g., anomaly cancellation or the vector-like nature of exotics) would be correctness concerns, not circularity, and do not affect the logical independence of the central conditional argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No numerical free parameters appear; the model inputs are discrete choices of gauge group, matter content, and the mechanism that enlarges theta periodicity. The central derivation relies on established gauge group theory plus model-dependent embedding assumptions, which are itemized as axioms above.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The topological charge quantization for the product gauge group (4) is Q = n + m q (equation 5), with q the vector of minimal fractional charges from Table I.
    This is a known result from [24,27,28], cited in Section II. It is the basis for condition (7).
  • domain assumption CP or P acts on the theta angle as theta -> -theta, while theta has period 2pi p.
    Equation (2) in Section II. This is the standard spurion transformation and the periodicity assumption used to derive the allowed values 0 or pi p.
  • ad hoc to paper The Standard Model can be matched to the model (8) with the stated symmetry-breaking pattern: USp(4) -> SU(2) via scalars in 5+10 and SU(6) -> SU(4) x SU(2)' via a scalar in the 15, with all exotic fermions acquiring large vector-like masses.
    Section II, model (8). No explicit scalar potential, mass spectrum, or anomaly check is given; the paper says these are model-dependent and require further study.
  • domain assumption The matching condition theta_QCD approx theta_1 holds with radiative corrections below the experimental bound.
    Equation (9) and Section III. The paper assumes any realistic spontaneous CP/P breaking solution keeps corrections to theta small, but does not compute them in the example.
invented entities (2)
  • Colored topological defects (Georgi-Glashow monopoles) at the unification scale
    purpose: They make the enlarged 4pi periodicity of the QCD theta angle physical at low energies; the full defect spectrum is invariant only under theta -> theta + 4pi.
    The paper invokes these defects as the low-energy manifestation of the UV gauge structure. They are generic GUT states, but no independent observational evidence is provided.
  • Exotic fermions and scalars of the SU(6) x USp(4) x USp(4)/Z2 model
    purpose: They embed Standard Model fermions and break the unified group to the Standard Model, including vector-like states that must become heavy.
    Part of the proof-of-concept model in Section II; no experimental handle outside the model is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FSM2Y3C3

@misc{pith2026250710680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FSM2Y3C3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10680}
}
abstract

Imposing CP or P forces the QCD topological angle to be either $\bar\theta=0$ or $\bar\theta=\pi$. However, only the former is phenomenologically viable. This implies that the assumption of CP or P alone cannot provide a framework for unambiguously solving the Strong CP problem. We show that $\bar\theta=0$ is naturally selected when the assumption of CP is combined with the hypothesis that the Standard Model is embedded in a suitable gauge group.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Minimal High-Quality QCD Axion

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A flat-interval 5D U(1) Wilson-line axion with 4D KSVZ/DFSZ anomaly sector supplies exponential quality protection while remaining minimal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ann E. Nelson. Naturally Weak CP Violation.Phys. Lett. B, 136:387–391, 1984. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84) 92025-2. 6

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84 1984

  2. [2]

    SO(10) grand unification

    For simplicity we did not consider abelian groups. Furthermore, Spin(4) and SO(4) = Spin(4)/Z2 are not shown; they admit fractional instantons of charge 1 /2 and have two topological angles. gles enter the path integral through terms like exp i¯θaQa with ⃗Q = ( Q1, Q2, · · ·) the topological charges. As well-known, ordinary BPST instantons [26] can be con...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Stephen M. Barr. Solving the Strong CP Problem Without the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 53:329, 1984. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.329

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.329 1984

  4. [4]

    K. S. Babu and Rabindra N. Mohapatra. A Solution to the Strong CP Problem Without an Axion. Phys. Rev. D, 41:1286, 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1286

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.1286 1990

  5. [5]

    Stephen M. Barr, D. Chang, and G. Senjanovic. Strong CP problem and parity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:2765–2768,

    work page

  6. [6]

    Solving the Strong CP Problem with Supersymmetry

    Gudrun Hiller and Martin Schmaltz. Solving the Strong CP Problem with Supersymmetry. Phys. Lett. B , 514:263–268, 2001. arXiv:hep-ph/0105254, doi:10. 1016/S0370-2693(01)00814-0

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Solution to the strong CP prob- lem: Supersymmetry with parity

    Ravi Kuchimanchi. Solution to the strong CP prob- lem: Supersymmetry with parity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:3486–3489, 1996. arXiv:hep-ph/9511376, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.76.3486

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Modular invariance and the QCD angle

    Ferruccio Feruglio, Alessandro Strumia, and Arsenii Titov. Modular invariance and the QCD angle. JHEP, 07:027, 2023. arXiv:2305.08908, doi:10.1007/ JHEP07(2023)027

    arXiv 2023

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Super-soft CP vi- olation

    Alessandro Valenti and Luca Vecchi. Super-soft CP vi- olation. JHEP, 07(152):152, 2021. arXiv:2106.09108, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)152

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Strominger and Edward Witten

    A. Strominger and Edward Witten. New Manifolds for Superstring Compactification. Commun. Math. Phys., 101:341, 1985. doi:10.1007/BF01216094

    1985 doi

  3. [11]

    Strong CP and flavor in multi-Higgs theories

    Lawrence Hall, Claudio Andrea Manzari, and Bea Noether. Strong CP and flavor in multi-Higgs theories. Phys. Rev. D, 111(11):115012, 2025. arXiv:2407.14585, doi:10.1103/rxml-5gd2

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Leigh, and Douglas A

    Michael Dine, Robert G. Leigh, and Douglas A. Mac- Intire. Of CP and other gauge symmetries in string theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:2030–2032, 1992. arXiv: hep-th/9205011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2030

    1992 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Kaplan, and Ann E

    Ki-woon Choi, David B. Kaplan, and Ann E. Nel- son. Is CP a gauge symmetry? Nucl. Phys. B , 391:515–530, 1993. arXiv:hep-ph/9205202, doi:10. 1016/0550-3213(93)90082-Z

    1993 arXiv

  6. [14]

    R. J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, and Ed- ward Witten. Chiral Estimate of the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron in Quantum Chromodynamics. Phys. Lett. B, 88:123, 1979. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 91, 487 (1980)]. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90128-X

    1980 doi

  7. [15]

    Challenges for the Nelson-Barr Mechanism

    Michael Dine and Patrick Draper. Challenges for the Nelson-Barr Mechanism. JHEP, 08:132, 2015. arXiv: 1506.05433, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)132

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Quark masses and chiral symmetry

    Michael Creutz. Quark masses and chiral symmetry. Phys. Rev. D , 52:2951–2959, 1995. arXiv:hep-th/ 9505112, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.2951

    1995 doi

  9. [17]

    Large N Chiral Dynamics

    Edward Witten. Large N Chiral Dynamics. Annals Phys., 128:363, 1980. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90325-5

    1980 doi

  10. [18]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Tem- perature

    Davide Gaiotto, Anton Kapustin, Zohar Komargodski, and Nathan Seiberg. Theta, Time Reversal, and Tem- perature. JHEP, 05:091, 2017. arXiv:1703.00501, doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)091

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Andrei V. Smilga. QCD at theta similar to pi. Phys. Rev. D, 59:114021, 1999. arXiv:hep-ph/9805214, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.114021

    1999 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Parity Conservation in QCD

    Cumrun Vafa and Edward Witten. Parity Conservation in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 53:535, 1984. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.53.535

    1984

  13. [21]

    Time-reversal breaking in QCD 4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions

    Davide Gaiotto, Zohar Komargodski, and Nathan Seiberg. Time-reversal breaking in QCD 4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions. JHEP, 01:110, 2018. arXiv:1708.06806, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)110

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A Property of Electric and Mag- netic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories

    Gerard ’t Hooft. A Property of Electric and Mag- netic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories. Nucl. Phys. B, 153:141–160, 1979. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79) 90595-9

    1979 doi

  15. [23]

    Colorful Mirror Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem

    Quentin Bonnefoy, Lawrence Hall, Claudio Andrea Man- zari, and Christiane Scherb. Colorful Mirror Solu- tion to the Strong CP Problem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(22):221802, 2023. arXiv:2303.06156, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.131.221802

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge the- ories

    Ofer Aharony, Nathan Seiberg, and Yuji Tachikawa. Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge the- ories. JHEP, 08:115, 2013. arXiv:1305.0318, doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)115

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus

    Gerard ’t Hooft. Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus. Commun. Math. Phys., 81:267–275, 1981. doi:10.1007/BF01208900

    1981 doi

  18. [26]

    A. A. Belavin, Alexander M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, and Yu. S. Tyupkin. Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations. Phys. Lett. B, 59:85–87, 1975. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-X

    1975 doi

  19. [27]

    Line Operators in the Standard Model

    David Tong. Line Operators in the Standard Model. JHEP, 07:104, 2017. arXiv:1705.01853, doi:10.1007/ JHEP07(2017)104

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    The Global Form of Flavor Sym- metries and 2-Group Symmetries in 5d SCFTs

    Fabio Apruzzi, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, Lakshya Bhard- waj, and Jihwan Oh. The Global Form of Flavor Sym- metries and 2-Group Symmetries in 5d SCFTs. Sci- Post Phys., 13(2):024, 2022. arXiv:2105.08724, doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.2.024

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Freed, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg

    Clay C´ ordova, Daniel S. Freed, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg. Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II. Sci- Post Phys., 8(1):002, 2020. arXiv:1905.13361, doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.002

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Pati and Abdus Salam

    Jogesh C. Pati and Abdus Salam. Lepton Number as the Fourth Color. Phys. Rev. D, 10:275–289, 1974. [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703–703 (1975)]. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.10.275

    1975

  23. [31]

    Anber and Erich Poppitz

    Mohamed M. Anber and Erich Poppitz. Nonperturba- tive effects in the Standard Model with gauged 1-form symmetry. JHEP, 12:055, 2021. arXiv:2110.02981, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)055

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kaplan, Tom Melia, and Surjeet Rajendran

    David E. Kaplan, Tom Melia, and Surjeet Rajendran. What can solve the Strong CP problem? 5 2025. arXiv: 2505.08358

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dimopoulos and Lawrence J

    S. Dimopoulos and Lawrence J. Hall. FLIPPING A W AY PROTON DECAY. Nucl. Phys. B, 255:633–647, 1985. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90157-9

    1985 doi

  26. [34]

    Lectures on Gauge Theory https://www

    David Tong. Lectures on Gauge Theory https://www. damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gaugetheory.html

  27. [35]

    R. Jackiw. Introduction to the Yang-Mills Quantum The- ory. Rev. Mod. Phys., 52:661–673, 1980. doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.52.661

    1980

  28. [37]

    Parity solves the Strong CP problem

    Ravi Kuchimanchi. Parity solves the Strong CP problem. 6 2025. arXiv:2506.01911

    2025 arXiv

  29. [1991]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2765

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.