Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Density Matrix Geometry and Sum Rules

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A time-dependent quantum geometric tensor built from the symmetric logarithmic derivative generates the known finite-temperature optical sum rules and a new orbital magnetization sum rule through one fluctuation-dissipation identity.

desk verdict A genuinely useful generating function for finite-temperature geometric sum rules, but the higher-order family needs an explicit spectral-decay condition before the broad claims hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14028 v1 pith:DNX6EYFT submitted 2025-07-18 cond-mat.mes-hall

Guangyue Ji , David E. Palomino , Nathan Goldman , Tomoki Ozawa , Peter Riseborough , Jie Wang , Bruno Mera This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumgeometrictensorthermaldensitymatrixsumrulesfluctuation-dissipationtheoremFisherinformationUhlmanncurvatureorbitalmagnetizationopticalconductivityrule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At zero temperature, geometric quantities such as the quantum metric and Berry curvature are encoded in optical sum rules, notably the Souza-Wilkens-Martin rule. This paper proposes a time-dependent quantum geometric tensor $S^{jk}(t)=\langle L_Q^j(t)L_Q^k(0)\rangle$ for thermal (mixed) states, built from the quantum part of the symmetric logarithmic derivative. The central claim is a generating identity, Eq. (16), that ties this tensor to the dissipative response $\chi_{O;D}(\omega)$; frequency-moment integration then yields a family of generalized sum rules at any temperature. The family contains the known finite-temperature Fisher-information and Uhlmann-curvature sum rules and adds a new finite-temperature orbital magnetization (magnetic circular dichroic) sum rule. If correct, the work gives a single fluctuation-dissipation origin for geometric sum rules and experimental routes to probe quantum geometry at finite temperature.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-dependent quantum geometric tensor $S^{jk}(t)=\langle L_Q^j(t)L_Q^k(0)\rangle$, where $L_Q^j$ is the quantum (off-diagonal) part of the symmetric logarithmic derivative defined by $\partial_j\rho=L_j\rho+\rho L_j$. Its spectral form is a Boltzmann-weighted sum of $\tanh^2[\beta(E_m-E_n)/2]$ times Berry-connection bilinears. The load-bearing identity is Eq. (16), which links $S^{jk}(\omega)$ to the dissipative susceptibility $\chi^{jk}_{O;D}(\omega)$ through the fluctuation-dissipation factor; multiplying by $\omega^n$ and integrating turns this identity into the family of generalized sum rules, and positivity of the correlation function supplies the Hankel-matrix bounds.

What would settle it

Take a gapless free-electron or Drude model and compute the second-order sum rule: the right-hand side requires $\int_0^\infty d\omega\,\tanh(\hbar\beta\omega/2)\,\mathrm{Re}\,\chi^{jk}_{O;D}(\omega)$, which diverges logarithmically for a Drude tail, while the left-hand side $F^{(2)}$ is finite; observing such a divergence in a controlled calculation would falsify the generalized family as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the Fourier transform $S^{jk}(\omega)$ of the time-dependent geometric tensor satisfies the exact relation $-\frac{1}{2\hbar}S^{jk}(\omega)=\frac{\tanh^2(\hbar\beta\omega/2)}{1-e^{-\hbar\beta\omega}}\frac{\chi^{jk}_{O;D}(\omega)}{(\hbar\omega)^2}$, and treats this as a generating function for sum rules. Multiplying by $\omega^n$ and integrating converts moments of the dissipative response into the $n$-th time derivatives at $t=0$ of the time-dependent quantum Fisher information $F^{jk}(t)$ and mean Uhlmann curvature $U^{jk}(t)$. The zeroth-order rules recover the finite-temperature Souza-Wilkens-Martin-type rules, and a first-moment rule gives a new finite-temperature orbital magnetization sum rule. Positivity of the underlying two-point correlation function yields Hankel-matrix bounds, including the nonnegativity of even Taylor coefficients $F^{(2m)}\ge 0$ and the determinant inequality $\det F^{(2m)}\ge \det U^{(2m)}$.

Load-bearing premise

The family of generalized sum rules assumes that the dissipative response decays fast enough at high frequency that the integrals $\int_0^\infty d\omega\,\omega^{n-2}\chi^{jk}_{O;D}(\omega)$ converge for every order $n$ used; the paper states no such spectral-support or decay condition, and gapless or metallic systems can violate it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The known finite-temperature sum rules for the quantum Fisher information matrix and the mean Uhlmann curvature follow as the zeroth-frequency-moment case, so the paper places both under one fluctuation-dissipation derivation.
  • A new finite-temperature orbital magnetization (magnetic circular dichroic) sum rule, Eq. (31), follows from the first frequency moment; at zero temperature it recovers the existing MCD sum rules.
  • Frequency moments of measured dissipative response can in principle be used to read off time derivatives of the quantum Fisher information and Uhlmann curvature, giving an experimental route to finite-temperature quantum geometry.
  • The positivity of the time-dependent geometric tensor implies restrictions on the dissipative spectrum, such as nonnegative even Taylor coefficients and determinant inequalities, that can be checked in optical measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same generating identity should apply to other conjugate pairs (spin currents, heat currents, stress operators), yielding finite-temperature geometric sum rules for those observables; the paper does not work these out.
  • The Hankel positivity bounds could be used as self-consistency tests on measured conductivity spectra: a spectrum violating $\det F^{(2m)}\ge\det U^{(2m)}$ would signal that the equilibrium linear-response assumptions are not met.
  • Because the zero-temperature first moment connects the optical integral $I^{ab}$ to Berry curvature, the finite-temperature version with $\tanh$ weight may define a temperature-dependent geometric invariant; the paper notes the simple proportionality breaks at finite temperature but does not propose such an invariant.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a time-dependent quantum geometric tensor for thermal density matrices, defined as the unequal-time two-point function of the quantum part of the symmetric logarithmic derivative, S^{jk}(t)=<L^j_Q(t)L^k_Q(0)>. The central result is the spectral identity (Eq. (16)) relating S^{jk}(omega) to the dissipative part of the response function, from which a family of generalized sum rules (Eqs. (17)-(18)) is obtained by frequency integration. The paper shows that the zeroth-order members reproduce the known finite-temperature Souza-Wilkens-Martin and Uhlmann-curvature sum rules, derives a new finite-temperature orbital magnetization sum rule (Eq. (31)), and derives positivity bounds on the time-dependent geometric tensor from the non-negativity of the associated Hankel matrix. The overall claim is that these results provide a unified fluctuation-dissipation interpretation of geometric sum rules for thermal density matrices.

Significance. If the technical issues are resolved, the paper would offer a useful unifying framework: the spectral identity (Eq. (16)) is algebraically clean, reproduces known zero-temperature and finite-temperature sum rules, and yields a new experimentally accessible sum rule for orbital magnetization. The derivation is self-contained and does not rely on fitted parameters; the explicit comparison with the Columbia-group tensor in Appendix A is a strength. The positivity/Hankel bounds are a natural and potentially useful extension of the static determinant bounds. However, the novelty is concentrated in the higher-order sum rules and the bounds, and these are exactly the parts that currently rest on unstated convergence assumptions and on a definitional inconsistency in the mean Uhlmann curvature. These issues are fixable, but they must be addressed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (17)-(18); Appendix B2.3, Eqs. (66)-(70); Appendix C, Eq. (131)] The derivation of the generalized sum-rule family and the Hankel-moment bounds assumes that the integrals ∫ dω ω^{n-2} χ^{jk}_{O;D}(ω) converge for all orders n used, and that the moments m_n = ∫ ω^n dμ(ω) exist for the positive measure S^{jj}(ω). The manuscript never states a spectral-decay or finite-bandwidth condition, yet the abstract and introduction claim the sum-rule family is valid at arbitrary temperature in thermal equilibrium without qualification. This is load-bearing: in a continuum model such as the 2D massive Dirac cone, the dissipative optical conductivity tends to a nonzero constant as ω→∞, so χ_D(ω) = -ω σ_D(ω) ~ ω and the integrand in Eq. (17) behaves as ω^{n-1} for n≥1, making the n=1 integral diverge (and the static QFI itself can diverge logarithmically). Lattice-regularised systems with bounded spectra are safe, but the paper does not delimit its claims to such systems. Please state explicitly the required UV-finite/bounded-spectrum hypothesis or an equivalent decay condition on χ_D, and discuss the status of the claims for gapless or unbounded-spectrum systems.
  2. [Eq. (20) and Eq. (62) versus Eqs. (14) and (65)] The time-dependent mean Uhlmann curvature is defined as U^{jk}(t) = 1/2[S^{jk}(t)-S^{kj}(t)] in Eq. (20) and Eq. (62). Combined with the static decomposition S^{jk}(0)=F^{jk}+iU^{jk} from Eq. (14), this gives U^{jk}(0)=iU^{jk}, i.e., the static limit of the time-dependent object is i times the real mean Uhlmann curvature. Consequently the left-hand side of the sum rule (18) at n=0 is purely imaginary while the right-hand side is real, and the same inconsistency propagates through all orders. This also contradicts Eq. (65), which correctly uses U^{jk}=ℑ[S^{jk}] at t=0. The definition must be U^{jk}(t) = -i/2[S^{jk}(t)-S^{kj}(t)] (equivalently, U is the imaginary part of S in the frequency domain) for Eqs. (17)-(18) and their appendix versions to be consistent with the known zeroth-order sum rules. Please correct the factor and re-derive the affected expressions.
  3. [Eqs. (19) and (63)] The quantity F^{jk}(t)=1/2[S^{jk}(t)+S^{kj}(t)] is called the time-dependent quantum Fisher information matrix, but it is not the anticommutator correlation function S_S^{jk}(t)=1/2[S^{jk}(t)+S^{kj}(-t)] introduced in Eq. (63). The two objects differ for t≠0, and the odd Taylor coefficients of S_S(t) are governed by the Uhlmann-curvature derivatives, not by F^{(n)}. Thus the odd-order sum rules in Eqs. (17)-(18) are not sum rules for time-derivatives of the natural anticommutator generalization of the static QFI. The authors should either justify why their index-space symmetrization is the intended generalization or adjust the terminology so that the physical interpretation of the odd-n sum rules is not misleading.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Acknowledgments] The word 'suport' should be 'support'.
  2. [Eqs. (17)-(18)] The notation 'tanh R_n(...)' and 'tanh I_n(...)' is confusing; please write tanh^{R_n} and tanh^{I_n} with an explicit exponent.
  3. [Appendix C2.1] Bochner's theorem is invoked for scalar positive definite functions, but the extension to the matrix-valued case needed for Eq. (135) is only asserted in one sentence; a brief explicit statement of the block-Hankel positivity argument would make the derivation more transparent.
  4. [Eq. (16)] The term 'generating function' for the spectral identity (16) is nonstandard; consider calling it a fluctuation-dissipation spectral identity or a sum-rule generating identity to avoid confusion with ordinary generating functions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the generating relation is an algebraic consequence of spectral representations and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, with all inputs defined independently.

full rationale

The central relation Eq. (16) combines the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Eq. (11)/(60), with the spectral comparison Eq. (58); both sides are defined independently, S from the SLD two-point function and chi from the retarded current response, and Eq. (58) follows from explicit spectral sums rather than from assuming Eq. (16). The family of sum rules in Eqs. (17)-(18) is obtained by multiplying Eq. (16) by omega^n and integrating; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and known SWM rules are recovered as the n=0 special case, which is a consistency check rather than an input. The orbital magnetization sum rule (31) is derived from the same spectral identities through the M(t) correlator and reduces at T=0 to known MCD results, again not by construction. The positivity bounds in Appendix C follow from Bochner's theorem applied to the time-dependent geometric tensor, independently of the response-function content. The reader-flagged spectral-decay or finite-bandwidth condition is a domain-of-validity and convergence issue for the higher-order integrals, not circularity: the generating relation itself is an identity of spectral measures, and the displayed sum rules are conditional on the convergence of the integrals shown. Self-citations present in the reference list are contextual and do not carry the load of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters or new entities. It relies on standard linear response, the thermal density matrix, and an unstated convergence assumption for higher-order moments.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The equilibrium state is the grand-canonical thermal density matrix ρ = e^{−βK}/Z with K = H − μN.
    Used throughout, starting at Eq. (5), to define the geometry of thermal states and the thermal averages in the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.
  • standard math Kubo linear response and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem relate the dissipative response to two-point correlation functions.
    Invoked in Eqs. (7)-(11) and used to derive the generating function Eq. (16).
  • domain assumption The total current operator equals (e/ℏ)∂H/∂K_a, with a position operator R satisfying [R^a,K^b]=iδ^{ab} on the twisted-boundary torus.
    Used in Appendix B3.2 (Eqs. 89-90) to connect flux-space geometry to optical conductivity; standard but subtle for periodic and magnetic systems, as footnote [56] notes.
  • domain assumption The frequency integrals over dissipative response used in the sum rules converge for all orders n considered; the spectrum has sufficient high-frequency decay (e.g., gapped, bounded support).
    Unstated in the paper; required for the generalized family of sum rules in Eqs. (17)-(18) and B2.3 to be well-defined beyond n=0,1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Density Matrix Geometry and Sum Rules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DNX6EYFT

@misc{pith2026250714028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Density Matrix Geometry and Sum Rules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DNX6EYFT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14028}
}
read the original abstract

Geometry plays a fundamental role in a wide range of physical responses, from anomalous transport coefficients to their related sum rules. Notable examples include the quantization of the Hall conductivity and the Souza-Wilkens-Martin (SWM) sum rule -- both valid at zero temperature, independent of interactions and disorder. The finite-temperature generalization of the SWM sum rule has been explored in the literature, revealing deep connections to the geometry of density matrices. Building on recent advances in time-dependent geometric frameworks, we propose a time-dependent quantum geometric tensor for thermal density matrices. This formalism provides a unified interpretation of known sum rules within the framework of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, further elucidating their fundamental geometric origin. In addition, it provides experimentally accessible methods to probe quantum geometry beyond the zero-temperature regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-State Geometry of Density Matrices and Rectification Sum Rules

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Rectification current in insulators obeys a zero-temperature sum rule expressed as a ground-state cumulant minus a many-body multi-state geometric tensor, generalizing known single-particle results.

  2. Perfect elliptic dichroism: Probing the metric of anisotropic quantum Hall droplets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Perfect elliptic dichroism is proposed as a direct diagnostic for the metric of anisotropic quantum Hall droplets, extending to ideal Chern bands via holomorphicity and to lattice models via renormalized emergent metrics.

  3. Exploring Many-Body Quantum Geometry Beyond the Quantum Metric with Correlation Functions: A Time-Dependent Perspective

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Bures distance between an initial and a time-evolved density matrix defines a time-dependent quantum metric and connection, extending many-body quantum geometry beyond the quantum metric to higher-order correlatio...

  4. Long and short time linear response of metals: a geometric approach

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For metals, the time-dependent quantum geometric tensor decomposes into a Drude-weight linear term and a divergent time-independent Fermi-surface term, and the ratio D/S1 distinguishes itinerant from bound charge at t...

  5. Quantum Fisher information of magnetic quantum phase transition on Kondo lattice

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In the Kondo-destroyed antiferromagnetic phase of a Kondo lattice, quantum Fisher information from transverse spin fluctuations witnesses multipartite entanglement while the longitudinal channel stays trivial; the eff...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports 697, 1 (2017), geome- try and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    (1) should be understood as the trace of the non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor defined over the degenerate ground state manifold

    When fractionalization phenomena occur, Eqn. (1) should be understood as the trace of the non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor defined over the degenerate ground state manifold

    work page

  4. [4]

    Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev

    R. Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899 (1994)

    1994

  5. [5]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  6. [6]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  7. [7]

    Resta and S

    R. Resta and S. Sorella, Electron localization in the in- sulating state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 370 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and berry-phase effects, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14915 (1999)

    work page 1999

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature communications 6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Hazra, N

    T. Hazra, N. Verma, and M. Randeria, Bounds on the superconducting transition temperature: Applications to twisted bilayer graphene and cold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031049 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized hall conductance as a topological invariant, Phys. Rev. B 31, 3372 (1985)

    1985

  4. [12]

    Goldman and T

    N. Goldman and T. Ozawa, Relating the Hall conduc- tivity to the many-body Chern number using Fermi’s Golden rule and Kramers–Kronig relations, Comptes Rendus Physique 25, 289 (2024), arXiv:2403.03340 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    heat- ing

    D. T. Tran, A. Dauphin, A. G. Grushin, P. Zoller, and N. Goldman, Probing topology by “heat- ing”: Quantized circular dichroism in ultracold atoms, Science Advances 3, e1701207 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1701207

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Ozawa and N

    T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Extracting the quantum met- ric tensor through periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201117 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Ozawa and N

    T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Probing localization and quantum geometry by spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 032019 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Asteria, D

    L. Asteria, D. T. Tran, T. Ozawa, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, N. Fl¨ aschner, K. Sengstock, N. Goldman, and C. Weitenberg, Measuring quantized circular dichroism in ultracold topological matter, Nature Physics 15, 449 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Tan, D.-W

    X. Tan, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Chu, Y.-Q. Zhu, D. Li, X. Yang, S. Song, Z. Han, Z. Li, Y. Dong, H.-F. Yu, H. Yan, S.-L. Zhu, and Y. Yu, Experimental Measure- ment of the Quantum Metric Tensor and Related Topo- logical Phase Transition with a Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev....

    2019

  10. [18]

    R. L. Klees, G. Rastelli, J. C. Cuevas, and W. Belzig, Microwave Spectroscopy Reveals the Quantum Geomet- ric Tensor of Topological Josephson Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 197002 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045103 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    R. L. Klees, J. C. Cuevas, W. Belzig, and G. Rastelli, Ground-state quantum geometry in superconductor– quantum dot chains, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014516 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    M. Yu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, Q. Lu, H. Liu, S. Zhang, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, T. Ozawa, 6 N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental measure- ment of the quantum geometric tensor using cou- pled qubits in diamond, National Science Review 7, 254 (2019), https://academic.oup.com...

    2019

  14. [22]

    M. Chen, C. Li, G. Palumbo, Y.-Q. Zhu, N. Goldman, and P. Cappellaro, A synthetic monopole source of Kalb- Ramond field in diamond, Science 375, 1017 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abe6437

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Molignini, B

    P. Molignini, B. Lapierre, R. Chitra, and W. Chen, Prob- ing Chern number by opacity and topological phase tran- sition by a nonlocal Chern marker, SciPost Physics Core 6, 059 (2023), arXiv:2207.00016 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    quantum holon- omy

    A. Uhlmann, Parallel transport and “quantum holon- omy” along density operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics 24, 229 (1986)

    1986

  17. [25]

    Uhlmann, A gauge field governing parallel transport along mixed states, Letters in Mathematical Physics 21, 229 (1991)

    A. Uhlmann, A gauge field governing parallel transport along mixed states, Letters in Mathematical Physics 21, 229 (1991)

    1991

  18. [26]

    Hyllus, W

    P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwem- mer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezz´ e, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entan- glement, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022321 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    T´ oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys

    G. T´ oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022322 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Hauke, M

    P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Mea- suring multipartite entanglement through dynamic sus- ceptibilities, Nature Physics 12, 778 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estima- tion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 023001 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Zanardi, P

    P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information- Theoretic Differential Geometry of Quantum Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 100603 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Zanardi, L

    P. Zanardi, L. Campos Venuti, and P. Giorda, Bures met- ric over thermal state manifolds and quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062318 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Paunkovi´ c and V

    N. Paunkovi´ c and V. Rocha Vieira, Macroscopic distin- guishability between quantum states defining different phases of matter: Fidelity and the Uhlmann geometric phase, Phys. Rev. E 77, 011129 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Viyuela, A

    O. Viyuela, A. Rivas, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Uhlmann Phase as a Topological Measure for One- Dimensional Fermion Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 130401 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    B. Mera, C. Vlachou, N. Paunkovi´ c, and V. R. Vieira, Uhlmann Connection in Fermionic Systems Undergoing Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 015702 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    B. Mera, C. Vlachou, N. Paunkovi´ c, V. R. Vieira, and O. Viyuela, Dynamical phase transitions at finite tem- perature from fidelity and interferometric loschmidt echo induced metrics, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094110 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    B. Mera, C. Vlachou, N. Paunkovi´ c, and V. R. Vieira, Boltzmann–Gibbs states in topological quantum walks and associated many-body systems: fidelity and Uhlmann parallel transport analysis of phase transitions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 365302 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    S. T. Amin, B. Mera, C. Vlachou, N. Paunkovi´ c, and V. R. Vieira, Fidelity and Uhlmann connection analysis of topological phase transitions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245141 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Mera, Information geometry in the analysis of phase transitions, Acta Physica Polonica A 135, 1171 (2019)

    B. Mera, Information geometry in the analysis of phase transitions, Acta Physica Polonica A 135, 1171 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    S. T. Amin, B. Mera, N. Paunkovi´ c, and V. R. Vieira, Information geometric analysis of long range topological superconductors, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 485402 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Silva, B

    H. Silva, B. Mera, and N. Paunkovi´ c, Interferometric geometry from symmetry-broken Uhlmann gauge group with applications to topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085127 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    B. Mera, N. Paunkovi´ c, S. T. Amin, and V. R. Vieira, Information geometry of quantum critical submanifolds: Relevant, marginal, and irrelevant operators, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155101 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Leonforte, D

    L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, and A. Carollo, Uhlmann number in translational invariant systems, Sci- entific Reports 9, 9106 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Phys. Rev. B 62, 1666 (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous Response and Quantum Geometry of Insulators, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.07052 (2024), arXiv:2403.07052 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2024

  37. [45]

    Carollo, B

    A. Carollo, B. Spagnolo, and D. Valenti, Uhlmann cur- vature in dissipative phase transitions, Scientific Reports 8, 9852 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    The ground state may be degenerate, in which case the zero temperature limit is the projector onto the ground state subspace, appropriately normalized by its rank

  39. [47]

    J. C. Budich and S. Diehl, Topology of density matrices, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165140 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Y. Wang, Y. Fang, F. Xie, and Q. Si, Local and Non- local Entanglement Witnesses of Fermi Liquid, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.13958 (2025), arXiv:2502.13958 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bardyn, L

    C.-E. Bardyn, L. Wawer, A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Probing the topology of density matrices, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011035 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    J. Liu, J. Chen, X.-X. Jing, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher information and symmetric logarithmic derivative via anti-commutators, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical 49, 275302 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    H. Tao, Y. Su, X. Zhang, J. Liu, and X. Wang, Lee- yang zeros and quantum fisher information matrix in a nonlinear system, Phys. Rev. E 108, 024104 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Zhang, X.-M

    X. Zhang, X.-M. Lu, J. Liu, W. Ding, and X. Wang, Di- rect measurement of quantum fisher information, Phys. Rev. A 107, 012414 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011052 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.13847 (2024), arXiv:2401.13847 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Shinada and N

    K. Shinada and N. Nagaosa, Quantum geometri- cal bound relations for observables, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.12836 (2025), arXiv:2507.12836 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025

  48. [56]

    In that case, the left-hand side of Eq

    These boundary conditions can be generalized in the presence of a magnetic field. In that case, the left-hand side of Eq. (26) involves a projective representation of the lattice Λ generated by the vectors Lj, realized via mag- netic translation operators. The right-hand side ...

  49. [57]

    Kuneˇ s and P

    J. Kuneˇ s and P. M. Oppeneer, Exact many-body sum rule 7 for the magneto-optical spectrum of solids, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15774 (2000)

    2000

  50. [58]

    Souza and D

    I. Souza and D. Vanderbilt, Dichroic f-sum rule and the orbital magnetization of crystals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 054438 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Resta, Magnetic circular dichroism versus orbital mag- netization, Phys

    R. Resta, Magnetic circular dichroism versus orbital mag- netization, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023139 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Framework to measure quan- tum metric from step response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106403 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7010 (1996)

    1996

  54. [62]

    J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum theory of orbital magnetization and its generalization to inter- acting systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 197202 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  56. [64]

    twisted boundary condition space

    D. Xiao, Y. Yao, Z. Fang, and Q. Niu, Berry-phase effect in anomalous thermoelectric transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 026603 (2006). 8 CONTENTS Acknowledgments 5 References 5 — Appendix — 8 A: Comparison with Columbia Papers 8 B: Geometrical Sum Rules 9 B1: Linear response theo...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.