Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 57 references

Finite-temperature properties of the Frenkel-Kontorova model: Relation to tribological systems and fluid rheology

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a thermally driven chain of spring-coupled beads, friction at intermediate speeds is set by the energy released in sudden instabilities, not by thermally lowered barriers.

desk verdict A solid simulation study with a good central mechanism, let down mainly by an abstract that claims more than the body measures. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14948 v1 pith:62TEZKEB submitted 2025-07-20 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shubham Agarwal , Martin H. Müser This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 83.60.Rs62.20.Qp
keywords Frenkel-KontorovamodelshearthinningeffectiveviscosityEyringenergydropsdiscommensurationssubdiffusiontribology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a thermally agitated Frenkel-Kontorova chain—beads connected by springs sliding in a periodic corrugated potential—as a minimal model that claims to reproduce qualitative features of complex liquids: subdiffusion, a crossover from non-Arrhenius to Arrhenius viscosity near the specific-heat peak, and shear thinning. Its central claim is that, at medium elastic coupling and intermediate sliding velocities, the effective viscosity is dictated by the energy drops $\Delta E_d$ that occur when shear-induced instabilities advance a kink, so $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx \Delta E_d/(v b)$ per atom. This means friction is set by the mechanical energy released in instabilities rather than by how shear forces lower the free-energy barriers for thermally activated motion. A direct corollary is that good fits to the Eyring model, or to Carreau–Yasuda, may be coincidental and cannot by themselves certify the underlying mechanism. The claim matters because it offers a parameter-free route from a static energy-landscape calculation to a rheological prediction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the discommensuration, or kink—a local region where the chain's natural spacing and the substrate period are out of step, enforced in the periodic chain by the boundary conditions. As the chain is dragged, the potential energy of the whole chain rises until an instability triggers, at which point an atom falls into the next well and the energy drops by $\Delta E_d$; the average of these drops over one substrate period gives the kinetic friction per atom, $f_k = \Delta E_d/b$, and hence the effective viscosity $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx \Delta E_d/(v b)$. The argument transfers this athermal, quasi-static energy drop to finite temperature and finite velocity by showing that a fast thermal chain's instantaneous energy trace is a delayed, smeared version of the slow athermal one, with the drop size unchanged. This transfer is what lets the paper replace Eyring's thermally reduced barrier with a mechanically determined energy drop.

What would settle it

Simulate a medium-coupled FK chain at a temperature and velocity where thermal activation is still visible, compute the actual dissipated energy per substrate period from the instantaneous potential-energy trace, and compare it with the athermal $\Delta E_d$; if $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}}(v)\, b\, v$ differs from $\Delta E_d$ by more than numerical thermal corrections, the proposed identity fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At medium elastic coupling, a periodically repeated Frenkel-Kontorova chain contains at least one discommensuration, and sliding its center of mass by one substrate period forces atoms through instabilities: an atom passes over a potential maximum and falls into the next minimum, releasing an energy $\Delta E_d$ that the chain then dissipates. The authors show, for chains with $k = 10\,V_0/a^2$ and $k = 15\,V_0/a^2$, that the athermal kinetic friction per atom equals $\Delta E_d/b$, and that the thermally driven chain at intermediate velocity reproduces the same energy drops, delayed and smeared but equal in size. From this they conclude that the effective viscosity obeys $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx \Delta E_d/(v b)$ per atom in the intermediate regime. Because this mechanism does not involve thermal activation over reduced barriers, a seemingly accurate Eyring fit to the simulated or experimental rheology can arise from different physics; the paper states this explicitly.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the energy drop released per kink advance in a hot, moving chain is the same as the drop measured in a cold, quasi-static center-of-mass drag, and that this equality survives across temperatures and velocities in the intermediate regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At intermediate velocities, the effective viscosity of a medium-coupled FK chain follows from athermal energy-landscape data alone, without fitting thermal barrier theories.
  • The details of damping and thermostat matter less in this regime; Brownian, Langevin, and viscoelastic chains give similar $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}}(v)$, while momentum-conserving damping can produce unstable motion and an effectively negative shear-thinning exponent.
  • An Eyring or Carreau–Yasuda fit to viscosity data does not establish the mechanism, because the same curves are reproduced by enforced basin hopping with a different physical cause.
  • The same model yields subdiffusion between ballistic and diffusive regimes and a non-Arrhenius to Arrhenius crossover near the specific-heat maximum, connecting tribological sliding to complex-liquid rheology.
  • For stiff chains ($k = 100$), the energy drops become tiny, friction becomes Stokes-like at low to intermediate velocity, and the response resembles structural lubricity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Direct measurements of energy dissipation bursts in interfacial sliding experiments, compared with the integrated drop $\Delta E_d/b$, could test the mechanism outside simulations.
  • The reasoning suggests re-examining published Eyring fits for confined liquids: if the fitted activation volume or prefactor is not consistent with independently measured energy barriers, the fit may reflect basin-hopping dissipation rather than thermal activation.
  • The open-chain result—a large pop-in energy drop followed by many small drops—implies that boundary effects can dominate friction and that effective barriers measured by dragging a finite chain may overestimate the true thermal nucleation barrier.
  • A natural extension is to disordered or multi-harmonic substrate potentials, where the relation $\eta_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx \Delta E_d/(v b)$ could be checked against energy drops computed from the static landscape.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the finite-temperature Frenkel-Kontorova (FK) chain as a minimal model for tribological and rheological phenomena. It derives the configurational specific heat of uncoupled particles in a sinusoidal potential, characterizes equilibrium viscosity and sub-diffusive dynamics at medium elastic coupling, and presents rheological data fitted with Eyring and Carreau-Yasuda forms. The central claim is that at medium elastic coupling and intermediate sliding velocities the effective viscosity is set by the energy drops ΔEd caused by shear-induced instabilities, giving ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v b) per atom, rather than by shear-induced reduction of thermal activation barriers; a stated corollary is that Eyring fits may be coincidental. The claim is supported by quasi-static athermal simulations and constant-force thermal simulations for two stiffnesses, several damping schemes, and periodic as well as open boundary conditions.

Significance. If the central mechanism holds, the paper provides a parameter-free, falsifiable alternative to thermal-activation pictures of shear thinning and a caution against over-interpreting Eyring fits. The analytic specific-heat result, the explicit energy-balance prediction, and the systematic variation of damping schemes, boundary conditions, and stiffnesses are genuine strengths, as is the availability of the simulation code and data on Github. The reader's concern that the microscopic equality is verified only for one direct energy trace is only partly valid: the grey line in Fig. 9 is already a macroscopic, parameter-free test of the equality across a range of velocities and temperatures. However, the microscopic identification of ΔEd with the actual per-instability dissipation at finite temperature and finite velocity remains inferred rather than directly measured, and the 'coincidental Eyring' conclusion is more an interpretive claim than a tested one.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B2, Figs. 9 and 11] The parameter-free prediction ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v b) is tested in Fig. 9 against constant-force viscosity data, and this is a meaningful macroscopic test of the energy balance. However, the microscopic identification of the quasi-static, athermal ΔEd with the per-instability energy dissipation under finite-temperature, constant-force dynamics is inferred rather than directly measured; the only direct energy-trace comparison is Fig. 11 for a single state point (v = 10^-2, kBT = 0.05). I request a quantitative measure of the agreement between the data and the grey line over the claimed intermediate-velocity window (for example, residuals or a stated tolerance), and, if feasible, statistics of energy-drop magnitudes in constant-force thermal trajectories at several (v, T) values, to rule out that the macroscopic agreement results from a compensation between altered drop sizes, kinetic-energy carryover, and other dissipative channels.
  2. [Sec. III.C and Fig. 14] The paper extends the ΔEd mechanism to the open chain and to alternative damping schemes in qualitative terms, but the supporting evidence is not at the same level as for the periodic k = 10 chain. For the open chain, the hull in Fig. 16 is built from one particular athermal cycle with pop-in and pop-out events, and no finite-temperature dissipated-energy measurement is shown; for the momentum-conserving Langevin thermostat, Fig. 14 shows a strong qualitative deviation from the ΔEd line, terminating at a critical velocity, yet the text states that the overall picture 'confirms this expectation'. Please state more precisely the parameter window in which ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v b) is expected to hold and where it is expected to fail, and provide direct evidence from at least one open-chain or alternative-damping case.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. IV] The conclusion that Eyring agreement 'may be purely coincidental' is not directly tested. The paper shows that Eyring and Carreau-Yasuda fits describe the same ηeff(v) data and that the ΔEd prediction also captures part of the data, but it does not test Eyring's distinguishing assumption that shear reduces the free-energy barrier for directed motion. A discriminating test would compare the measured force-velocity relation with the Eyring barrier-reduction prediction, or show that the temperature dependence of the fitted Eyring parameters contradicts the barrier picture while remaining consistent with the ΔEd picture. Without such a test, the 'coincidental' claim should be presented as a possibility or a caution, not as a demonstrated conclusion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states a 'cross-over from a non-Arrhenius to an Arrhenius dependence of the diffusion coefficient', but the corresponding results are presented for the equilibrium viscosity (Figs. 3 and 10), not for the diffusion coefficient; please either provide diffusion-coefficient data or rephrase the abstract and conclusions in terms of viscosity.
  2. [Sec. II.B.1, Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), the term '2ux' is almost certainly a typo for '2x_n' (or the corresponding bead coordinate); as printed, the term is dimensionally inconsistent.
  3. [Sec. II.B.1 and Sec. III.B] Minor typos: 'sping stiffness' should be 'spring stiffness', and 'This quantum equals the energy dissipated...' should be 'This quantity equals...'.
  4. [Sec. III.C] The reference to 'Fig. 19' for the open-chain hull is incorrect; the open-chain effective viscosity is shown in Fig. 16.
  5. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption says 'RMS displacement dynamics', but Eq. (13) and the plotted quantity are the mean squared displacement; the terminology should be aligned.
  6. [Fig. 9 caption] There is a typo 'shwon'; in addition, the caption says circles represent constant-force data, but the text states that for T = 0.12 the chains were driven at constant center-of-mass velocity, so the symbol for that case should be identified in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v b) estimate uses an independently measured athermal energy drop and is compared, not fitted, to thermal rheology data.

full rationale

The central claim that medium-to-high-velocity friction is dictated by the energy drop ΔEd is not circular. ΔEd is read off from athermal, quasi-static, center-of-mass-constrained simulations at v = 10^-5 and kBT = 0 (Figs. 4 and 5), while the effective viscosity data in Fig. 9 come from constant-force thermal simulations. The grey line ΔEd/(bv) is a comparison curve, not a fit to those viscosity data, so a failure of the comparison would have been visible; the paper even notes that it is only an 'upper bound or even estimate' in part of the velocity range. The intermediate step fk = ΔEd/b is an energy-balance statement for the athermal sliding cycle, and it is separately verified for two stiffness values (k = 10 and k = 15) against the directly measured kinetic friction force. The extension of this quasi-static athermal result to finite temperature and velocity is tested in Fig. 11, where the dissipated energy per event is compared between the slow athermal and fast thermal chains; that is a genuine empirical check rather than an assumption smuggled in by definition. The Eyring and Carreau-Yasuda fits are retrospective descriptions of the simulation data, and the claim that Eyring agreement may be coincidental is an interpretive conclusion, not an input to the derivation. The self-citations (refs. 29, 30, 37) provide background on the Prandtl-model analogy and thermostat implementation; they are not load-bearing for the paper's main energy-drop mechanism. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main weakness noted in the manuscript itself — that the broad applicability of the quasi-static ΔEd is asserted beyond the few directly checked parameter points — is a scientific-support limitation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The 'enforced basin hopping' is a mechanism, not an entity. The central prediction is built on measured energy drops, not on fitted parameters, aside from the descriptive Eyring/CY fits used for comparison. The main assumptions are the accuracy of the thermostats, the velocity-and-temperature independence of ΔEd, and the qualitative analogy between discommensurations and liquid coordination defects.

free parameters (3)
  • Eyring fit parameters (η0, v0) per temperature = varies with T; see Figs. 2, 9, 12, 13, 16
    Used only to demonstrate that the Eyring equation describes the simulated ηeff(v) data. These fitted constants do not enter the basin-hopping derivation of ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v·b).
  • Carreau-Yasuda fit parameters (η0, γ̇0, n, a) per temperature = varies with T; see Figs. 9, 13, 16
    Used to compare fit quality of CY versus Eyring. The shear-thinning exponent n is a fit descriptor, not an input to the model's mechanistic prediction.
  • Kink half-width ζ from fits to configuration data = 0.63 a for k=10
    Used to compare with the continuum approximation ζ = a√k* = 0.53 a (Sec. III.B). Supporting detail, not load-bearing for the central claim.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The Langevin equation with damping m/τ and random force satisfying the fluctuation-dissipation relation samples the canonical ensemble at temperature T.
    Standard statistical mechanics result, used implicitly throughout the simulations (Eqs. 2-3).
  • domain assumption The Grønbech-Jensen thermostat (ref. 36) accurately integrates the Langevin equation for the chosen time steps.
    The numerical integration is trusted from the cited thermostat paper; the authors do not benchmark it in this work.
  • ad hoc to paper The energy dissipated per kink advance equals the potential-energy drop ΔEd measured in quasi-static athermal sliding, independent of temperature and velocity in the intermediate shear regime.
    Introduced in Sec. III.B and used to predict ηeff ≈ ΔEd/(v·b). The paper provides numerical evidence for k=10 and k=15 and for several damping schemes, but it is a model-specific assumption rather than a general derivation.
  • domain assumption Discommensurations in the FK chain are dynamically analogous to coordination defects that enable mass transport in liquids.
    Stated in the Introduction and Discussion as the motivation for relating FK results to fluid rheology. Explicitly acknowledged as plausible but not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite-temperature properties of the Frenkel-Kontorova model: Relation to tribological systems and fluid rheology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/62TEZKEB

@misc{pith2026250714948,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite-temperature properties of the Frenkel-Kontorova model: Relation to tribological systems and fluid rheology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/62TEZKEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14948}
}
read the original abstract

The Frenkel-Kontorova model is a simple yet generic framework for the description of tribological phenomena and processes, including dry solid friction and the motion of adsorbed layers. As revealed in this work, it also reproduces qualitatively various features of complex liquids, such as, power-law sub-diffusion between the ballistic and the diffusive regimes as well as a cross-over from a non-Arrhenius to an Arrhenius dependence of the diffusion coefficient near the temperature, where the specific heat assumes its maximum. The study of these and related thermal and kinetic properties highlights several misconceptions prevalent in the literature. Most notably, shear thinning with a shear-thinning exponent close to zero can be the natural consequence from enforced basin hopping: the energy drops caused by shear-induced instabilities dictate the friction-velocity dependence at medium shear rates rather than the way how shear forces reduce the free energy barriers for directed motion. Thus, even if the rheology is described by semi-empirical theories such as the Eyring model, any agreement with experimental data, whether past, present, or future, may be purely coincidental.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14948 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. reveals consistency between the analytical and numerical results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Effective viscosity of free atoms in a corrugated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Equilibrium viscosity as a function of temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the dynamics of an athermal chain sub￾jected to periodic boundary condition that occurs when it is moved at a small, constant center-of-mass velocity relative to the corrugated potential. The bottom panel shows the actual phase shifts on the absicca and the bead …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the total potential energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. RMS displacement dynamics for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Effective viscosity of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Athermal and thermal energy barrier for medium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Effective viscosity of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Effect of dynamical properties and thermostats on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Similar to Fig. 4 but this time for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Effective viscosity of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Effective viscosity of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Athermal dynamics of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Configurational specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Athermal dynamics of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Here, V0 is of unit energy and q = 2 π/b is the wavenumber of the potential and b the period

    Default model The default Frenkel-Kontorova model studied in this work consists of a one-dimensional, linearly harmonic bead-spring chain with nearest-neighbor interactions, 3 which is placed into a single-sinusoidal potential of the form V (x) = V0 cos(qx). Here, V0 is of unit energy and q = 2 π/b is the wavenumber of the potential and b the period. Damp...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (2), we also consider two alternative approaches for dissipating energy, which deviate from the standard implementation of instantaneous damping relative to the substrate

    Alternative damping schemes In addition to the default model defined in Eq. (2), we also consider two alternative approaches for dissipating energy, which deviate from the standard implementation of instantaneous damping relative to the substrate. In the first approach, damping and thermalization are implemented via Maxwell elements. This corresponds form...

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    However, the location of the peak maximum, T ∗, moved to a temperature about 2.5 times higher than for very weak coupling (Fig

    Thermal dynamics of the default model We note that the finite elastic coupling between the beads does not alter the dependence of specific heat on temperature qualitatively compared to the uncoupled case. However, the location of the peak maximum, T ∗, moved to a temperature about 2.5 times higher than for very weak coupling (Fig. 6), although the energy ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    9 shows results for the effective viscosity of the k = 10 V0/a2, N = 16, and a/b = 15/16 chain

    Driven dynamics of the default model Fig. 9 shows results for the effective viscosity of the k = 10 V0/a2, N = 16, and a/b = 15/16 chain. The rhe- ological response resembles, as is the case for uncoupled atoms, that of many non-Newtonian liquids: the equilib- rium viscosity η0 increases with decreasing temperature and the effective viscosity can be descr...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This can be said to correspond to a body force

    Non-uniform force distribution and constraints Throughout most of this work, the external driving force is distributed uniformly among the beads in the chain. This can be said to correspond to a body force. In reality, external forces do not directly apply to atoms or molecules in a sheared liquid, but indirectly via in- termittent layers. Thus, the exter...

    work page

  6. [6]

    In this view, the rate at which excess kinetic 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 v 101 102 eff/ 0.12 0.2 0.5 FIG

    Alternative damping From our analysis conducted so far, shear thinning has been rationalized from the perspective of basin hop- ping. In this view, the rate at which excess kinetic 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 v 101 102 eff/ 0.12 0.2 0.5 FIG. 13. Effective viscosity of a ˜k = 10 chain with periodic boundary condition and constant velocity applied to alternate ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Frenkel and T

    J. Frenkel and T. Kontorova. On the theory of plastic deformation and twinning. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 13:1–10, 1938

    work page 1938

  8. [8]

    Flor ´ ıa and Juan J

    Luis M. Flor ´ ıa and Juan J. Mazo. Dissipative dynamics of the Frenkel-Kontorova model. Advances in Physics , 45(6):505–598, December 1996

    work page 1996

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Braun, Thierry Dauxois, Maxim V

    Oleg M. Braun, Thierry Dauxois, Maxim V. Paliy, and Michel Peyrard. Nonlinear mobility of the gen- eralized Frenkel-Kontorova model. Physical Review E , 55(3):3598–3612, March 1997

    1997

  2. [10]

    Driven dynamics of simpli- fied tribological models

    A Vanossi and OM Braun. Driven dynamics of simpli- fied tribological models. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 19(30):305017, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Driven Frenkel- Kontorova model

    Torsten Strunz and Franz-Josef Elmer. Driven Frenkel- Kontorova model. I. Uniform sliding states and dynam- ical domains of different particle densities. Physical Re- view E , 58(2):1601, 1998

    1998

  4. [12]

    Driven Frenkel- Kontorova model

    Torsten Strunz and Franz-Josef Elmer. Driven Frenkel- Kontorova model. II. Chaotic sliding and nonequilibrium melting and freezing. Physical Review E , 58(2):1612, 1998

    1998

  5. [13]

    The size of a dislocation

    R Peierls. The size of a dislocation. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 52(1):34–37, January 1940

    1940

  6. [14]

    Dislocations in a simple cubic lat- tice

    F R N Nabarro. Dislocations in a simple cubic lat- tice. Proceedings of the Physical Society , 59(2):256–272, March 1947

    1947

  7. [15]

    C. A. Coulomb. Th´ eorie des machines simples.Memoirs de Mathematique et de Physique de l”acadmie Royale , pages 161–342, 1785

  8. [16]

    M¨ user, Michael Urbakh, and Mark O

    Martin H. M¨ user, Michael Urbakh, and Mark O. Rob- bins. Statistical mechanics of static and low-velocity ki- netic friction, January 2003

    2003

  9. [17]

    Benassi, Ming Ma, M

    A. Benassi, Ming Ma, M. Urbakh, and A. Vanossi. The breakdown of superlubricity by driving-induced commen- surate dislocations. Scientific Reports , 5(1), November 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    The effect of temperature and velocity on superlubricity

    Joost A van den Ende, Astrid S de Wijn, and Annal- isa Fasolino. The effect of temperature and velocity on superlubricity. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 24(44):445009, October 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    H M¨ user

    M. H M¨ user. Structural lubricity: Role of dimension and symmetry. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 66(1):97–103, April 2004

    2004

  12. [20]

    Brazda, A

    T. Brazda, A. Silva, N. Manini, A. Vanossi, R. Guerra, E. Tosatti, and C. Bechinger. Experimental observa- tion of the aubry transition in two-dimensional colloidal monolayers. Physical Review X , 8(1), March 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Jesper Norell, Annalisa Fasolino, and Astrid S. de Wijn. Emergent friction in two-dimensional frenkel-kontorova models. Physical Review E , 94(2), August 2016

    2016

  14. [22]

    Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals — strong/fragile patterns and problems

    C.A Angell. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals — strong/fragile patterns and problems. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids , 131–133:13–31, June 1991

    1991

  15. [23]

    Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as ex- amples of absolute reaction rates

    Henry Eyring. Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as ex- amples of absolute reaction rates. The Journal of Chem- ical Physics, 4(4):283–291, April 1936

    1936

  16. [24]

    On the commonality between theoretical models for fluid and solid friction, wear and tribochemistry

    Hugh Spikes and Wilfred Tysoe. On the commonality between theoretical models for fluid and solid friction, wear and tribochemistry. Tribology Letters, 59(1), June 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Pierre J. Carreau. Rheological equations from molecular network theories. Transactions of the Society of Rheology, 16(1):99–127, March 1972

    1972

  18. [26]

    Yasuda, R

    K. Yasuda, R. C. Armstrong, and R. E. Cohen. Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of lin- ear and star branched polystyrenes. Rheologica Acta, 20(2):163–178, March 1981

    1981

  19. [27]

    Vanossi, G.E

    A. Vanossi, G.E. Santoro, N. Manini, E. Tosatti, and O.M. Braun. Lubricated friction between in- commensurate substrates. Tribology International , 41(9–10):920–925, September 2008

    2008

  20. [28]

    Rapaport

    D.C. Rapaport. Hydrogen bonds in water: Net- work organization and lifetimes. Molecular Physics , 16 50(5):1151–1162, December 1983

    1983

  21. [29]

    K¨ uhne, Matthias Krack, Fawzi R

    Thomas D. K¨ uhne, Matthias Krack, Fawzi R. Mohamed, and Michele Parrinello. Efficient and accurate Car- Parrinello-like approach to Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics. Physical Review Letters, 98(6), February 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    Aubry and P.Y

    S. Aubry and P.Y. Le Daeron. The discrete Frenkel- Kontorova model and its extensions. Physica D: Nonlin- ear Phenomena, 8(3):381–422, September 1983

    1983

  23. [31]

    The twist map, the extended frenkel- kontorova model and the devil’s staircase

    Serge Aubry. The twist map, the extended frenkel- kontorova model and the devil’s staircase. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 7(1–3):240–258, May 1983

    1983

  24. [32]

    Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition

    U Bengtzelius, W Gotze, and A Sjolander. Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics , 17(33):5915–5934, November 1984

    1984

  25. [33]

    L. Prandtl. Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theo- rie der festen K¨ orper.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Angewandte Math- ematik und Mechanik , 8(2):85–106, 1928

    1928

  26. [34]

    Popov and J.A.T

    V.L. Popov and J.A.T. Gray. Prandtl-Tomlinson model: History and applications in friction, plasticity, and nan- otechnologies. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift f¨ ur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 92(9):683–708, July 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Martin H. M¨ user. Shear thinning in the Prandtl model and its relation to generalized Newtonian fluids. Lubri- cants, 8(4):38, March 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Hongyu Gao and Martin H. M¨ user. On the shear- thinning of alkanes. Tribology Letters, 72(1), December 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Manzi, Wilfred T

    Sergio J. Manzi, Wilfred T. Tysoe, and Octavio J. Furlong. Temperature dependences in the Tomlin- son/Prandtl model for atomic sliding friction. Tribology Letters, 55(3):363–369, June 2014

    2014

  30. [38]

    Sergio Javier Manzi, Sebastian Eduardo Carrera, Oc- tavio Javier Furlong, Germaine Djuidje Kenmoe, and Wilfred T. Tysoe. Prandtl–Tomlinson-type models for molecular sliding friction. Tribology Letters, 69(4), Octo- ber 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Locked-to-running transition in the two-dimensional un- derdamped driven frenkel-kontorova model

    OM Braun, MV Paliy, J R¨ oder, and AR Bishop. Locked-to-running transition in the two-dimensional un- derdamped driven frenkel-kontorova model. Physical Re- view E , 63(3):036129, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Atomistic lock- ing and friction

    Motohisa Hirano and Kazumasa Shinjo. Atomistic lock- ing and friction. Physical Review B, 41(17):11837–11851, June 1990

    1990

  33. [41]

    Martin H. M¨ user. Frenkel-Kontorova.https://github. com/mueser/Frenkel-Kontorova.git., 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Complete set of stochastic Verlet-type thermostats for correct Langevin simulations

    Niels Grønbech-Jensen. Complete set of stochastic Verlet-type thermostats for correct Langevin simulations. Molecular Physics, 118(8):e1662506, September 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    Advanced Langevin thermostats: Properties, extensions to rheology, and a lean momentum-conserving approach

    Shubham Agarwal, Sergey V Sukhomlinov, Marc Ho- necker, and Martin H M¨ user. Advanced Langevin thermostats: Properties, extensions to rheology, and a lean momentum-conserving approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15579, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Statistical mechanics of dis- sipative particle dynamics

    P Espa˜ nol and P Warren. Statistical mechanics of dis- sipative particle dynamics. Europhysics Letters (EPL) , 30(4):191–196, May 1995

    1995

  37. [45]

    Dissipative particle dynamics: A useful thermostat for equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations

    Thomas Soddemann, Burkhard D¨ unweg, and Kurt Kre- mer. Dissipative particle dynamics: A useful thermostat for equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Physical Review E , 68(4), October 2003

    2003

  38. [46]

    Vattulainen, M

    I. Vattulainen, M. Karttunen, G. Besold, and J. M. Polson. Integration schemes for dissipative particle dy- namics simulations: From softly interacting systems to- wards hybrid models. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 116(10):3967–3979, March 2002

    2002

  39. [47]

    H. Risken. The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of So- lution and Applications , volume 18 of Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, 2nd edition, 1989

    1989

  40. [48]

    H. A. Kramers. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica, 7(4):284–304, 1940

    1940

  41. [49]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec. Reaction-rate theory: Fifty years after Kramers. Reviews of Modern Physics, 62(2):251–341, 1990

    1990

  42. [50]

    Vinay Ambegaokar and B. I. Halperin. Voltage due to thermal noise in the dc Josephson Effect.Physical Review Letters, 22(25):1364–1366, June 1969

    1969

  43. [51]

    The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics ap- proach

    Ralf Metzler and Joseph Klafter. The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics ap- proach. Physics Reports, 339(1):1–77, December 2000

    2000

  44. [52]

    Andersen

    Walter Kob and Hans C. Andersen. Testing mode- coupling theory for a supercooled binary lennard-jones mixture i: The van hove correlation function. Physical Review E, 51(5):4626–4641, May 1995

    1995

  45. [53]

    Krajewski and Martin H

    Florian R. Krajewski and Martin H. M¨ user. Quan- tum Creep and Quantum-Creep Transitions in 1D Sine- Gordon Chains. Physical Review Letters, 92(3), January 2004

    2004

  46. [54]

    C. A. Angell. Formation of glasses from liquids and biopolymers. Science, 267(5206):1924–1935, March 1995

    1924

  47. [55]

    Selective actuation enabled multifunctional magneto-mechanical metamaterial for programming elas- tic wave propagation

    Jay Sim, Shuai Wu, Sarah Hwang, Lu Lu, and Ruike Re- nee Zhao. Selective actuation enabled multifunctional magneto-mechanical metamaterial for programming elas- tic wave propagation. Advanced Functional Materials , 35(16):2422325, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Micro magnetic tweezers for nanomanipulation inside live cells

    Anthony HB De Vries, Bea E Krenn, Roel van Driel, and Johannes S Kanger. Micro magnetic tweezers for nanomanipulation inside live cells. Biophysical journal , 88(3):2137–2144, 2005

    2005

  49. [57]

    Char- acterizing intracellular mechanics via optical tweezers- based microrheology

    Bart E Vos, Till M Muenker, and Timo Betz. Char- acterizing intracellular mechanics via optical tweezers- based microrheology. Current Opinion in Cell Biology , 88:102374, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.