Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 85 references

Quantum thermodynamics in a rotating BTZ black hole spacetime

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A detector co-rotating with a BTZ black hole heats faster than it cools.

desk verdict Solid thermodynamics application to BTZ detectors, but the headline heating/cooling asymmetry is an artifact of comparing two different baths, not an intrinsic effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16787 v1 pith:XKRVD5N2 submitted 2025-07-22 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Wenjing Chen , Yixuan Ma , Si-Wei Han , Zihao Wang , Jun Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph
keywords Unruh-DeWittdetectorBTZblackholequantumthermodynamicsMpembaeffectopensystemsFisherinformationthermalizationasymmetryKossakowskicoefficients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives the full open-quantum-system dynamics of an Unruh-DeWitt detector co-rotating with a BTZ black hole, then treats the resulting relaxation as a quantum thermodynamic process. Its central claim is that approach to equilibrium is direction-dependent: a detector heating toward the locally perceived KMS temperature is always faster than a detector cooling across the same temperature interval, an asymmetry the authors liken to the quantum Mpemba effect. Black hole angular momentum changes how large this heating/cooling gap is but does not reverse it. The same calculation also shows that the choice of boundary conditions for the scalar field at infinity suppresses the oscillations in the thermodynamic quantities under Dirichlet conditions and stretches the thermalization timescale far beyond Neumann or transparent conditions.

What carries the argument

The engine of the calculation is the UDW detector treated as a two-level open system whose dissipator is fixed by the Wightman function of a massless conformally coupled scalar in BTZ spacetime. The load-bearing object is the detector response $C(\omega)$, analytically evaluated by the method of images as a sum over associated Legendre functions for Neumann, transparent, and Dirichlet boundary conditions, satisfying the KMS condition $C(\omega)=e^{\beta\omega}C(-\omega)$. From it come the Kossakowski coefficients $\gamma_\pm$ and $\gamma_0$ that set the relaxation rates $2g^2(\gamma_+ + \gamma_0)$ and $2g^2\gamma_+$ in the Bloch solution; the asymmetry is then quantified by the Uhlmann fidelity to the final Gibbs state and by the quantum degree of completion $R_{t/T}$, the ratio of path lengths in quantum state space.

What would settle it

Set both detectors in a single bath at one KMS temperature, initialize them symmetrically around the thermal state with equal angular displacement, and compute the fidelity and degree of completion; since the paper's Bloch solution gives both states the same relaxation rate, equal completion curves in this setup would falsify the claim that heating is intrinsically faster than cooling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: for a two-level UDW detector on a circular co-rotating orbit outside a rotating BTZ black hole, thermalization is not time-reversal symmetric. Using the analytical response function $C(\omega)$ of the detector to a massless scalar field, the authors solve the GKSL master equation and obtain the full Bloch-vector trajectory, then verify three quantum thermodynamic laws: a zeroth law stated as vanishing quantum relative entropy to the thermal state, a first law splitting internal-energy change into heat, coherence, and (for driven detectors) work, and a second law with nonnegative entropy production. Comparing a detector heating from a lower Gibbs temperature $T_C$ to the local KMS temperature $T_H$ with one cooling from $T_H$ to $T_C$, they find $F_{\mathrm{heating}}(t) \geq F_{\mathrm{cooling}}(t)$ for all finite times and a quantum degree of completion that is always larger for heating, and they show black hole spin modulates the magnitude of this asymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison protocol assumes that placing one detector in a hotter local bath and one in a colder local bath, then comparing their relaxation curves, reveals an intrinsic property of the thermalization dynamics rather than simply reflecting the hand-picked difference between the two bath temperatures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A co-rotating UDW detector outside a BTZ black hole approaches its local equilibrium along asymmetric paths: at every finite time, the fidelity to the thermal state is larger for heating than for cooling.
  • The black hole's angular momentum affects the size of the heating/cooling asymmetry, but the dominance of heating over cooling is preserved.
  • Boundary conditions at infinity matter thermodynamically: Dirichlet conditions make the entire thermalization process much slower than Neumann or transparent conditions, and they suppress the oscillatory dependence of thermodynamic quantities on angular momentum.
  • The quantum First Law becomes three-way bookkeeping: internal-energy change splits into heat, coherence, and work, and in the standard fixed-gap detector the heat and coherence rates trade off while work vanishes.
  • The quantum Second Law holds through a nonnegative entropy production rate even though the von Neumann entropy itself can temporarily decrease, because entropy flows out to the scalar field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the reported asymmetry is a comparison between two different local baths. The heating detector sits in a region with local temperature $T_H$ and the cooling detector in a region with $T_C$, so the two trajectories have different Kossakowski coefficients; the same Bloch equation run at a single common temperature would not exhibit this direction-dependent effect.
  • Beyond the paper: 'heating faster than cooling' is measured by fidelity and path-completion, not by instantaneous speed. The paper's own insets show the cooling speed can exceed the heating speed at late times, so the claim should be read as path-integrated progress toward equilibrium, not as a statement about instantaneous velocities.
  • Beyond the paper: the same machinery could be applied to higher odd-dimensional analogs of the Unruh effect, where the statistics-inversion feature the authors note for BTZ might flip or suppress the asymmetry, giving a clean test of whether the effect is specific to 2+1 dimensions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the thermalization of an Unruh-DeWitt detector co-rotating outside a rotating BTZ black hole. Starting from a Markovian master equation, the authors analytically compute the detector's response to a massless scalar field with Neumann, transparent, and Dirichlet boundary conditions, and use the resulting Kossakowski coefficients to analyze the detector's quantum relative entropy, heat/coherence/work decomposition, entropy production, and quantum Fisher information. The advertised main result is an "intrinsic asymmetry" between heating and cooling: a detector heating from T_C to T_H is claimed to thermalize faster than a detector cooling from T_H to T_C, in analogy with the quantum Mpemba effect. The paper also examines how black hole angular momentum and boundary conditions affect these thermodynamic quantities.

Significance. If the asymmetry claim were correct, it would connect black hole rotation to a genuine quantum-thermodynamic effect and would be of interest to the quantum-information and gravitational communities. The paper has real technical merit: the analytic response function in Eq. (2.39) and its derivation in Appendix A, the explicit Bloch solution (2.14), and the closed-form thermodynamic quantities in Section 3 are presented without fitted parameters and appear internally consistent. However, the central interpretive claim is not supported by the protocol or the measures used, as detailed below. The useful parts of the paper are therefore the thermodynamic-law analysis, not the Mpemba analogy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (2.14), Fig. 12] The central claim of an intrinsic heating/cooling asymmetry is not supported. For a fixed bath, the Bloch solution (2.14) gives n_z(t) = -γ ± δ e^{-2g^2 γ_+ t} for symmetric heating and cooling initial conditions, i.e., the two evolutions are mirror images with the same relaxation rate. The fidelity (4.4) is a nonlinear function of l(t), so F_heating ≥ F_cooling can hold even when the underlying state-space distance decays identically; the inequality reflects a property of the measure, not of the dynamics. The inset of Fig. 12 shows v_Q(cooling) exceeding v_Q(heating) at later times, which directly undermines the speed claim, and the replacement of speed by R_{t/T} in Eq. (4.9) depends on an arbitrary end time T and therefore does not establish a protocol-independent asymmetry. The abstract's "intrinsic asymmetry" and Section 5's statement that "the heating protocol for a UDW detector is always faster than the cooling one" are accordingly overstatements.
  2. [Section 4 protocol (Fig. 11)] The heating and cooling processes are run in different baths at local temperatures T_H and T_C. Because the Kossakowski coefficients in Eqs. (2.11) and (2.42) depend on the detector's local temperature, the comparison conflates the temperature dependence of γ_+ with any intrinsic heating/cooling asymmetry. To isolate an intrinsic effect, the authors would need to compare heating and cooling in the same bath at fixed T, with initial states at T_C < T and T_H > T chosen symmetrically around T; the present design does not control for this.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4] The analogy to the quantum Mpemba effect is not justified. The quantum Mpemba effect refers to a state that starts farther from equilibrium relaxing faster than a closer one in the same environment, or to a symmetry-breaking initial condition relaxing faster than a symmetric one. Here the comparison is between different environments at different temperatures, and no ordering of relaxation rates independent of the chosen information-geometric measure is demonstrated. The data show at most that F_heating(t) ≥ F_cooling(t) for the specific temperature pair and boundary conditions used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The word "thermolization" should be "thermalization" in both places.
  2. [Section 4, text near Fig. 12] The sentence "at later times, the heating velocity surpasses cooling" appears to be a typo; the surrounding discussion and the insets of Fig. 14 suggest it should read "is surpassed by cooling."
  3. [Appendix A] The reference "Fig.??" is unresolved and should be replaced with the actual figure number.
  4. [Section 3.3] There are several typos, including "in genenral" and "repectively," which should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the heating/cooling asymmetry is computed from the analytically derived response function and KMS coefficients, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central results are computed, not assumed. The detector's Bloch dynamics (2.14) follows from the GKSL master equation with coefficients gamma_+, gamma_-, and gamma_0 fixed by the analytically evaluated response C(omega) (2.39), whose KMS property (2.41) defines the local temperature. The quantum relative entropy, heat/coherence rates, entropy production rate, quantum Fisher information, and fidelity (4.4)-(4.8) are closed-form evaluations of these solutions; no parameter is fitted to the claimed heating/cooling asymmetry. The self-citations [25] and [74] supply auxiliary formulas (QRE expression, Markovian approximation) that are not load-bearing: the asymmetry section does not depend on them. The protocol of Sec. 4 compares two detectors in two different baths (at T_H and T_C), so the statement 'heating is faster than cooling' is a comparison of relaxation rates gamma_+(T_H) vs gamma_+(T_C); the paper itself acknowledges the velocity crossing and introduces R_{t/T} (4.9) to maintain the ordering. That is an interpretive caveat about whether the asymmetry is 'intrinsic', but it is not circular: the quoted numbers are derived from C(omega) and (2.14), rather than defined into existence. No circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, mediators, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities. All ingredients (UDW detector, BTZ geometry, scalar field, Hartle-Hawking vacuum) are standard.

free parameters (2)
  • Temperature pair (T_H, T_C) for the heating/cooling protocol = T_H = 1/sqrt(2π), T_C = 1/(2π) in the main figures
    The central asymmetry result is demonstrated for chosen temperature pairs realized by placing the detectors at specific radial positions. The 'heating always faster than cooling' claim is not proven for arbitrary pairs and depends on this hand-chosen input.
  • Radial positions of the two co-rotating detectors = Fixed by requiring the local KMS temperatures equal T_H and T_C
    The two detectors are located at positions where the Tolman-redshifted Hawking temperature is T_H or T_C. This choice determines which bath is hotter and therefore which relaxation rate gamma_+ is larger, driving the headline asymmetry.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Markov approximation and rotating-wave approximation for the UDW detector open dynamics
    Used to derive the GKSL master equation (2.7) in Section 2.1; the Markov approximation requires the Wightman function to decay on timescales much shorter than the detector relaxation time, which is assumed to hold.
  • domain assumption Method of images and Hartle-Hawking vacuum for the BTZ scalar field
    The BTZ Wightman function (2.31) is an infinite image sum over the AdS3 Wightman function; this standard construction is invoked in Section 2.2.1.
  • domain assumption KMS condition for the Hartle-Hawking state
    Eq. (2.41) imposes C(ω) = e^{βω} C(-ω), which sets the thermalization end and the detailed-balance structure.
  • domain assumption Local detailed balance for the jump operators (2.17)
    Needed to define entropy production and the heat flux in Section 3.4; assumes the bath is thermal and the jump operators come in pairs satisfying detailed balance.
  • domain assumption Sharp switching regularization for the response function
    Eq. (2.38) uses a sharp switching function with switch-on in the asymptotic past to define C(ω); this regularizes the Wightman integral but modifies the UV behavior.
  • domain assumption The two-level truncation of the UDW detector and linear monopole coupling
    The detector is modeled as a TLS with Hamiltonian H = (ω/2)σ3 and coupling mμ = σμ in Section 2.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum thermodynamics in a rotating BTZ black hole spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XKRVD5N2

@misc{pith2026250716787,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum thermodynamics in a rotating BTZ black hole spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XKRVD5N2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16787}
}
read the original abstract

We address the problem of the thermalization process for an Unruh-DeWitt (UDW) detector outside a BTZ black hole, from a perspective of quantum thermodynamics. In the context of an open quantum system, we derive the complete dynamics of the detector, which encodes a complicated response to scalar background fields. Using various information theory tools, such as quantum relative entropy, quantum heat, coherence, quantum Fisher information, and quantum speed of evolution, we examined three quantum thermodynamic laws for the UDW detector, where the influences from BTZ angular momentum and Hawking radiation are investigated. In particular, based on information geometry theory, we find an intrinsic asymmetry in the detector's thermolization process as it undergoes Hawking radiation from the BTZ black hole. In particular, we find that the detector consistently heats faster than it cools, analogous to the quantum Mpemba effect for nonequilibrium systems. Moreover, we demonstrate that the spin of a black hole significantly influences the magnitude of the asymmetry, while preserving the dominance of heating over cooling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black Holes and Entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  3. [3]

    S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse, Phys. Rev. D14, 2460 (1976)

    1976

  4. [4]

    R. M. Wald,The Thermodynamics of Black Holes, Living Rev. Relativity,4, 6 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking,The Four Laws of Black Hole Mechanics, Comm. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    Witten,Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics, arXiv:2412.16795

    E. Witten,Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics, arXiv:2412.16795

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum gravity: the new synthesis, in: S. W. Hawking, W. Israel (Eds.), General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979) p. 680

    1979

Show all 85 references
  1. [10]

    G. L. Sewell,Quantum fields on manifolds: PCT and gravitationally induced thermal states, Ann. Phys.141, 201 (1982)

    1982

  2. [11]

    N. D. Birrell and P. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984)

    1984

  3. [12]

    Crispino,et al.,The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev

    L. Crispino,et al.,The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787 (2008)

    2008

  4. [13]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Fast Scramblers, J. High Energ. Phys.10(2008) 065

    2008

  5. [14]

    Cotleret al.,Black Holes and Random Matrices, J

    J.S. Cotleret al.,Black Holes and Random Matrices, J. High Energ. Phys.05(2017) 118. – 38 –

    2017

  6. [15]

    Blommaert, T

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and H. Verschelde,Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity, J. High Energy Phys.03(2021) 086

    2021

  7. [16]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press 2002)

    2002

  8. [17]

    Yu and J

    H. Yu and J. Zhang,Understanding Hawking radiation in the framework of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. D77, 024031 (2008)

    2008

  9. [18]

    Hu and H

    J. Hu and H. Yu,Geometric phase outside a Schwarzschild black hole and the Hawking effect, J. High Energy Phys.09(2012) 062

    2012

  10. [19]

    J. Feng, Y. -Z. Zhang, M. D. Gould, and H. Fan,Uncertainty relation in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Lett. B743, 198 (2015)

    2015

  11. [20]

    Kaplanek and C

    G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess,Qubits on the horizon: Decoherence and thermalization near black holes, J. High Energ. Phys.01(2021) 098

    2021

  12. [21]

    Vinjanampathy and J

    S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders,Quantum thermodynamics, Contemp. Phys.57, 545 (2016)

    2016

  13. [22]

    Kosloff,Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100 (2013)

    R. Kosloff,Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100 (2013)

    2013

  14. [23]

    Juan-Delgado and A

    A. Juan-Delgado and A. Chenu,First law of quantum thermodynamics in a driven open two-level system, Phys. Rev. A104, 022219 (2021)

    2021

  15. [24]

    Alipour, A

    S. Alipour, A. T. Rezakhani, A. Chenu, A. del Campo, and T. Ala-Nissila,Entropy-based formulation of thermodynamics in arbitrary quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. A105, L040201 (2022)

    2022

  16. [25]

    S.-W. Han, Z. Ouyang, Z. Hu, and J. Feng,Relative entropy formulation of thermalization process in a Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Lett. B861, 139235 (2025)

    2025

  17. [26]

    Arias, T

    E. Arias, T. R. de Oliveira and M. S. Sarandy,The Unruh quantum Otto engine, J. High Energy Phys.02(2018) 168

    2018

  18. [27]

    Gray, and R

    F. Gray, and R. B. Mann,Scalar and fermionic Unruh Otto engines, J. High Energy Phys. 11(2018) 174

    2018

  19. [28]

    G. R. Kane and B. R. Majhi,Entangled quantum Unruh Otto engine is more efficient, Phys. Rev. D104, L041701 (2021)

    2021

  20. [29]

    Moustos and O

    D. Moustos and O. Abah,Quantum thermal machines in BTZ black hole spacetime, arXiv:2503.14370

    arXiv

  21. [30]

    Patterson and R

    E. Patterson and R. B. Mann,Fisher information of a black hole spacetime, J. High Energy Phys.06(2023) 214

    2023

  22. [31]

    Z. Tian, X. Liu, J. Wang, and J. Jing,Dissipative dynamics of an open quantum battery in the BTZ spacetime, arXiv:2409.09259

    arXiv

  23. [32]

    Ba˜ nados, C

    M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,Black Hole in Three-dimensional Spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1849 (1992)

    1992

  24. [33]

    Ba˜ nados, M

    M. Ba˜ nados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli,Geometry of the 2+1 black hole, Phys. Rev. D48, 1506 (1993)

    1993

  25. [34]

    C. A. Rodr ´ ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, and A. Aspuru-Guzik,Thermodynamics of quantum coherence, arXiv:1308.1245. – 39 –

    arXiv

  26. [35]

    B. d. L. Bernardo,Unraveling the role of coherence in the first law of quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E102, 062152 (2020)

    2020

  27. [36]

    Deffner and E

    S. Deffner and E. Lutz,Nonequilibrium Entropy Production for Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140404 (2011)

    2011

  28. [37]

    Ib´ a˜ nez, , Dieball, C., Lasanta, A.et al.,Heating and cooling are fundamentally asymmetric and evolve along distinct pathways, Nat

    M. Ib´ a˜ nez, , Dieball, C., Lasanta, A.et al.,Heating and cooling are fundamentally asymmetric and evolve along distinct pathways, Nat. Phys.20, 135 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Tejero, R

    ´A. Tejero, R. S´ anchez, L. El Kaoutit, D. Manzano, and A. Lasanta,Asymmetries of thermal processes in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research7, 023020 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    L. P. Bettmann and J. Goold,Information geometry approach to quantum stochastic thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E111, 014133 (2025)

    2025

  31. [40]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold,Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    E. B. Davies,Markovian master equations, Commun. Math. Phys.39, 91 (1974)

    1974

  33. [42]

    E. B. Davies,Markovian master equations. II, Math. Ann.219, 147 (1976)

    1976

  34. [43]

    J. M. Horowitz and J. M. R. Parrondo,Entropy production along nonequilibrium quantum jump trajectories, New J. Phys.15, 085028 (2013)

    2013

  35. [44]

    Manzano, J

    G. Manzano, J. M. Horowitz, and J. M. R. Parrondo,Quantum Fluctuation Theorems for Arbitrary Environments: Adiabatic and Nonadiabatic Entropy Production, Phys. Rev. X8, 031037 (2018)

    2018

  36. [45]

    K. Funo, N. Shiraishi, and K. Saito,Speed limit for open quantum systems, New J. Phys. 21, 013006 (2019)

    2019

  37. [47]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini,Entanglement generation in uniformly accelerating atoms: Reexamination of the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. A70, 012112 (2004)

    2004

  38. [48]

    Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  39. [49]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  40. [50]

    D¨ umcke and H

    R. D¨ umcke and H. Spohn,The proper form of the generator in the weak coupling limit, Z. Physik B34, 419 (1979)

    1979

  41. [51]

    Carlip,The (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Class

    S. Carlip,The (2 + 1)-dimensional black hole, Class. Quantum Grav.12, 2853 (1995)

    1995

  42. [52]

    S. J. Avis, C. J. Isham and D. Storey,Quantum field theory in anti-de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D18, 3565 (1978)

    1978

  43. [53]

    A. R. Steif,The quantum stress tensor in the three-dimensional Black hole, Phys. Rev. D 49, 585 (1994)

    1994

  44. [54]

    Lifschytz and M

    G. Lifschytz and M. Ortiz,Scalar field quantization on the (2+1)-dimensional black hole background, Phys. Rev. D49, 1929 (1994)

    1994

  45. [55]

    Hodgkinson and J

    L. Hodgkinson and J. Louko,Static, stationary, and inertial Unruh-deWitt detectors on the BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D86, 064031 (2012). – 40 –

    2012

  46. [56]

    E. A. Patterson and R. B. Mann,Thermal Fisher Information for a Rotating BTZ Black Hole, Entropy27, 478 (2025)

    2025

  47. [57]

    M. P. G. Robbins, L. J. Henderson, and R. B. Mann,Entanglement amplification from rotating black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 02LT01 (2022)

    2022

  48. [58]

    Bueley, L

    K. Bueley, L. Huang, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann,Harvesting mutual information from BTZ black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D106, 025010 (2022)

    2022

  49. [59]

    R. C. Tolman,On the Weight of Heat and Thermal Equilibrium in General Relativity, Phys. Rev.35, 904 (1930)

    1930

  50. [60]

    J. D. Brown, J. Creighton, R. B. Mann,Temperature, Energy, and Heat Capacity of Asymptotically Anti-De Sitter Black Holes, Phys.Rev. D50, 6394 (1994)

    1994

  51. [61]

    Kubo,Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo,Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.12, 570 (1957)

    1957

  52. [62]

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger,Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I, Phys. Rev.115, 1342 (1959)

    1959

  53. [63]

    Louko and A

    J. Louko and A. Satz,Transition rate of the Unruh-DeWitt detector in curved spacetime, Class. Quantum Gravity,25, 055012 (2008)

    2008

  54. [64]

    Takagi,Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration, Prog

    S. Takagi,Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.88, 1 (1986)

    1986

  55. [65]

    Arrechea, C

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, L.J. Garay, G. Garc ´ ıa-Moreno,Inversion of statistics and thermalization in the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. D104, 065004 (2021)

    2021

  56. [66]

    Feng and J.-J

    J. Feng and J.-J. Zhang,Quantum Fisher information as a probe for Unruh thermality, Phys. Lett. B827(2022) 136992

    2022

  57. [67]

    Hsiang and B.-L

    J.-T. Hsiang and B.-L. Hu,Zeroth law in quantum thermodynamics at strong coupling: In equilibrium, not at equal temperature, Phys. Rev D103, 085004 (2021)

    2021

  58. [68]

    Wang, W.-G

    J. Wang, W.-G. Wang and J. Wang,Thermalization of small quantum systems: from the zeroth law of thermodynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 055002 (2022)

    2022

  59. [69]

    Alicki,The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J

    R. Alicki,The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, L103 (1979)

    1979

  60. [70]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio,Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017)

    2017

  61. [71]

    Lostaglio, K

    M. Lostaglio, K. Korzekwa, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph,Quantum Coherence, Time-Translation Symmetry, and Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. X5, 021001 (2015)

    2015

  62. [72]

    Korzekwa, M

    K. Korzekwa, M. Lostaglio, J. Oppenheim, and D. Jennings,The extraction of work from quantum coherence, New J. Phys.18, 023045 (2016)

    2016

  63. [73]

    Mori,Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annu

    T. Mori,Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 35 (2023)

    2023

  64. [74]

    S.-W. Han, W. Chen, L. Chen, Z. Ouyang, and J. Feng,The reliable quantum master equation of the Unruh-DeWitt detector, arXiv:2502.06411

  65. [75]

    R. Dann, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff,Time-dependent Markovian quantum master equation, Phys. Rev. A98, 052129 (2018). – 41 –

    2018

  66. [76]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner,Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: foundations and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011)

    2011

  67. [77]

    Ito,Stochastic Thermodynamic Interpretation of Information Geometry, Phys

    S. Ito,Stochastic Thermodynamic Interpretation of Information Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 030605 (2018)

    2018

  68. [78]

    Marvian,Operational Interpretation of Quantum Fisher Information in Quantum Thermodynamics, Phys

    I. Marvian,Operational Interpretation of Quantum Fisher Information in Quantum Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 190502 (2022)

    2022

  69. [79]

    L. P. Garc ´ ıa-Pintos, S. B. Nicholson, J. R. Green, A. Del Campo, and A. V. Gorshkov, Unifying Quantum and Classical Speed Limits on Observables, Phys. Rev. X12, 011038 (2022)

    2022

  70. [80]

    Yadin, S

    B. Yadin, S. Imai, and O. G¨ uhne,Quantum Speed Limit for States and Observables of Perturbed Open Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 230404 (2024)

    2024

  71. [81]

    Van Vu and K

    T. Van Vu and K. Saito,Thermodynamic Unification of Optimal Transport: Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation, Minimum Dissipation, and Thermodynamic Speed Limits, Phys. Rev. X13, 011013 (2023)

    2023

  72. [82]

    Scandi, P

    M. Scandi, P. Abiuso, J. Surace, and D. De Santis,Quantum Fisher Information and its dynamical nature, arXiv:2304.14984

    arXiv

  73. [83]

    Petz and C

    D. Petz and C. Ghinea, inQuantum Probability and Related Topics(World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), pp. 261–281

    2011

  74. [84]

    S. B. Nicholson, A. del Campo, and J. R. Green,Nonequilibrium uncertainty principle from information geometry, Phys. Rev. E98, 032106 (2018)

    2018

  75. [85]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Feng, Y.-Z. Zhang and H. Fan,Quantum estimation in an expanding spacetime, Annals Phys.397(2018) 336

    2018

  76. [86]

    Du and Robert B

    H. Du and Robert B. Mann,Fisher information as a probe of spacetime structure: relativistic quantum metrology in (A)dS, J. High Energy Phys.05(2021) 112

    2021

  77. [87]

    Chen and J

    L. Chen and J. Feng,Quantum Fisher information of a cosmic qubit undergoing non-Markovian de Sitter evolution, J. High Energy Phys.06(2025) 029. – 42 –

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.