Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Space-time crystals from particle-like topological solitons

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A nematic liquid crystal under steady, unstructured light spontaneously forms an oscillating lattice of topological solitons — a continuous space-time crystal.

desk verdict A plausible first classical continuous space-time crystal with real experimental diagnostics, but the spontaneous-symmetry-breaking test rests on an unverified reset assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16972 v1 pith:CCOESAV5 submitted 2025-07-22 cond-mat.soft

Hanqing Zhao , Ivan I. Smalyukh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords space-timecrystalscontinuoustimenematicliquidtopologicalsolitonsNéeldomainwallsspontaneoussymmetrybreakingphotoalignmenttime-crystallineorder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that a nematic liquid crystal illuminated by constant-intensity, unstructured light can spontaneously organize into a periodic array of particle-like topological solitons that oscillates in time, forming what the authors call a continuous space-time crystal. The claim is that both spatial and temporal translation symmetries are broken without any periodic external drive, with the oscillation emerging from a feedback loop between light, the photo-responsive dye at the cell surfaces, and the birefringent director field. The authors argue that this meets the established criteria for time-crystalline order: the time phase is random across repetitions, the order is robust to perturbations, and it recovers after spatiotemporal dislocations. If correct, this would be the first continuous space-time crystal and the first time crystal that can be watched directly under a microscope or with the naked eye.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a light–director feedback loop. Linearly polarized blue light orients azobenzene dye molecules at the top surface perpendicular to the polarization; the dye reorients the adjacent nematic director, which rotates the polarization ellipse of light traversing the birefringent cell, which in turn reorients the dye at the bottom surface, and so on. This spontaneously produces alternating ±1 Néel domain wall solitons, topological quasiparticles classified by π1(S1/Z2) ≅ Z, whose elastic interactions are represented as topological elastic bonds between neighboring solitons. Treating time as an extra coordinate, the same ±1 solitons repeat periodically in time, and the many-body elastic interaction landscape — approximately harmonic for small displacements — is what locks the array into a space-time crystal.

What would settle it

Repeatedly block and unblock the driving light on the same sample area and record the oscillation phase after each restart; if the phases cluster around a preferred value instead of spreading uniformly over 0 to 2π, the system retains memory and the spontaneous-breaking claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a 1+1 dimensional continuous space-time crystal forms in a nematic liquid crystal with photo-responsive dye-coated surfaces under steady ambient-power blue light. The emergent pattern is a lattice of ±1 Néel domain wall solitons — particle-like topological quasiparticles of the first homotopy group π1(S1/Z2) — whose elastic interactions create a many-body system that maintains spatial and temporal order. The temporal periodicity (about 4.6 s in the representative experiment) is intrinsic, not imposed by the light, and the relative time phase across 75 block–unblock realizations is uniformly distributed between 0 and 2π, indicating spontaneous breaking of continuous time translation symmetry. The authors support this with numerical modeling based on Frank–Oseen elasticity coupled to light-driven surface reorientation, and show that the crystalline fraction remains stable under temporal perturbations while the system recovers defect-free order after space-time dislocations.

Load-bearing premise

The random-phase test assumes that blocking and unblocking the light resets the sample to a completely memory-free initial condition, so the measured spread of time phases really reflects spontaneous symmetry breaking rather than leftover bias from the previous run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The temporal periodicity can be tuned from tens of seconds to milliseconds by changing cell thickness, light intensity, or temperature, while the spatial periodicity stays nearly fixed.
  • Superimposing two crystal arrays gives orthorhombic and monoclinic space-time lattices, showing that richer space-time groups are accessible.
  • The order survives hours at room temperature, withstands temporal intensity noise, and heals after spatiotemporal dislocations, consistent with rigidity from topological protection.
  • Because the phase of the oscillation is random on each re-emergence, the arrays can serve as physical random-number sources and fingerprint-like anti-counterfeiting marks.
  • Polarized light passing through the crystal acquires space- and time-varying geometric phase, pointing toward dynamic Pancharatnam–Berry optical elements and telecommunication-wavelength modulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the random-phase result is robust, the same feedback mechanism might produce space-time crystals in other photo-alignable soft materials, not just nematic liquid crystals.
  • The power-law time correlation (quasi-long-range order) suggests that in larger or longer-lived samples one might observe a true long-range ordered time crystal or a finite-temperature melting transition in time; the paper does not settle which.
  • A sharper test of spontaneous breaking would measure the phase distribution without relying on the assumption that blocking the light erases all memory of the previous realization — for example, by quenching from different initial dye orientations.
  • The 1+1D restriction follows from the non-equivalence of space and time coordinates; extending to 2+1D or 3+1D would require higher-dimensional solitons such as hopfions, which the authors mention as a possibility.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the observation of a continuous space-time crystal in a nematic liquid crystal driven by constant-intensity unstructured light. The authors argue that a photo-alignment feedback loop produces a periodic array of Néel domain-wall solitons that oscillates in time, breaking both continuous time translation symmetry and spatial translation symmetry. They support this with polarizing optical microscopy, space-time imaging, FFT analysis showing a 0.217 Hz peak, a power-law time correlation, random relative phases across 75 realizations, and robustness to perturbations. They also develop a Frank-Oseen-based numerical model with photo-responsive boundary conditions and show simulated director configurations, space-time images, and phase distributions that they claim match experiment.

Significance. If correct, this would be the first continuous space-time crystal in a classical system and, notably, one observable by eye. The work combines a rich set of experimental diagnostics (polarizing optical microscopy, three-photon fluorescence polarizing microscopy, space-time reconstruction) with numerical modeling based on standard Frank-Oseen elasticity, temperature-dependent material constants, and Jones-matrix optics. The potential to realize time-crystalline order in a technologically mature soft-matter platform is conceptually interesting and could open applications in optical modulation and anti-counterfeiting. The authors also provide explicit criteria for time-crystalline identification and test them, which is a strength. However, the central spontaneous-symmetry-breaking claim rests on a reset experiment whose validity is not demonstrated, and several quantitative claims lack error bars or statistical tests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Quasi-long-range order and relative time phases'; Fig. 4] The reset protocol for the random-phase test is not validated. In each of the 75 realizations, the driving light is blocked with a red filter and then unblocked; after Δt = 60 s the phase is measured. The paper does not show that this waiting time fully erases the previous state. If the azobenzene cis→trans relaxation or any residual director orientation persists over 60 s, the re-emergent phase could be biased, and the uniform phase distribution in Fig. 4c would not be a clean demonstration of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Please provide evidence of memory erasure: for example, vary Δt, test the uniformity of the phase distribution with a Rayleigh test, and report the correlation between successive phases in the same spatial region. Without this, the random-phase diagnostic does not distinguish a time crystal from any autonomous limit cycle.
  2. [Fig. 4d,e and Methods, 'Numerical modelling of solitonic quasi-particles and their crystals'] The simulated distribution of relative time phases in Fig. 4e is unexplained. The update rule in Eq. (3), combined with the deterministic torque-balance equation, contains no noise term and no described random initial-condition protocol. It is therefore unclear what physical process generates a spread of phases across different simulated realizations. Please specify exactly how the simulations for Fig. 4d,e are initialized and how many realizations are used, or add the missing stochastic ingredient. This is required to support the claim that the simulated phase distribution mirrors the experimental spontaneous-symmetry-breaking test.
  3. [Fig. 1g,h; Extended Data Fig. 2; Fig. 2i] The key quantitative claims lack error bars and statistical characterization. The FFT peak at 0.217 Hz in Fig. 1h is reported without a peak width, confidence interval, or number of independent measurements. The power-law fit with exponent -0.09 in Extended Data Fig. 2 has no error estimate or goodness-of-fit value, yet it underpins the quasi-long-range-order claim. Similarly, the experimental periodicity versus intensity and temperature in Fig. 2i has no error bars. These omissions are load-bearing because the paper uses these numbers to distinguish the reported state from an ordinary periodic pattern, so please provide at least standard deviations across independent measurements for each reported period and correlation exponent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors and grammatical slips: "reporte d" in the abstract, "dimmensions" in the discussion of space-time dislocations (page 10), and inconsistent use of "an CSTC" versus "a CSTC" (e.g., page 5 and Fig. 4 caption). These should be corrected.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (4)] In Eq. (4), the notation is confusing: ΔTem is defined as the difference between T_NI and the LC temperature, but the equation uses (ΔTem − Te) where Te is listed as a fitting coefficient. Please clarify whether Te is a fitting offset separate from ΔTem and define it explicitly in the text or in the supplementary tables.
  3. [Fig. 3f,h] The crystalline fraction Ξ is defined differently in experiment (sum over FFT amplitudes) and simulation (sum over nx), which is acceptable qualitatively, but the caption should state explicitly that the two definitions are not identical; otherwise the direct comparison in Fig. 3g,i may be misread as the same observable.
  4. [Introduction and References [20-22]] The paper states that CSTCs have not been convincingly demonstrated in either quantum or classical systems, but Refs. [20-22] describe 'space-time crystals' in a superfluid quantum gas. The authors should briefly explain how their claim is consistent with those reports, or qualify the statement to clarify the distinction (e.g., continuous vs. discrete symmetry breaking).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central experimental observation and numerical model are self-contained; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental observation of spontaneously time-periodic soliton arrays and a numerical model based on the Frank-Oseen free energy (Eq. 1) with a standard surface anchoring term (Eq. 2) and literature material parameters for 5CB. The temporal periodicity (0.217 Hz in Fig. 1h) is measured, not fitted; the simulation period emerges from the torque-balance dynamics rather than being imposed to match experiment. The random-phase test (Fig. 4c) is an experimental sampling of 75 blocking/unblocking realizations; while the reset assumption could be questioned experimentally, that is a validity concern, not a circularity, because the measured distribution is not an input to the model. The robustness tests (Fig. 3) are independent perturbations. The paper's self-citations (e.g., refs. 38, 39, 45, 48, 56, 57) supply background on liquid-crystal solitons, dMR photoalignment, and nonlinear microscopy; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central time-crystal claim, and the identification criteria are taken from external works (refs. 29-33). No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to the circularity patterns considered.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Frank-Oseen theory, a phenomenological photoalignment rule, a viscous torque balance, and community-defined time crystal criteria. The main free parameters are the light coupling efficiency eta and empirical material-constant fits; no new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • light coupling efficiency eta = Not directly measured; varied in simulations, with eta_max=0.5 used for perturbation studies and a threshold eta~0.3…
    Phenomenological parameter in the surface free energy F_surface = -integral d2r eta W/2 (n_s dot n)^2; controls light-to-surface coupling strength and is tuned to reproduce qualitative trends in temporal periodicity.
  • empirical coefficients Ae, Be, Ce, De, Te for temperature-dependent material constants = Listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2
    Used in Eq. (4) to fit K11, K22, K33, and birefringence as functions of temperature; fitted to standard 5CB data, not to the target space-time crystal result.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Frank-Oseen elastic free energy describes the bulk director energetics
    Invoked as Eq. (1); standard continuum model for nematic liquid crystals.
  • domain assumption Surface director aligns perpendicular to the major axis of the polarization ellipse of traversing light
    Assumed in Methods for the dye-LC photoalignment feedback; not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption Director dynamics follows the torque balance delta F/delta n_i = -gamma d n_i/dt
    Used to map simulation iterations to physical time (Methods, Eq. (3) and surrounding text).
  • domain assumption The adopted criteria for identifying time-crystalline order (random relative phases, robustness, quasi-long-range order) are valid and sufficient
    Taken from refs 29-33; the conclusion that the system is a genuine time crystal depends on these criteria being accepted.
  • standard math Light propagation through the LC cell is accurately modeled by the Jones matrix method with local optical axes
    Used to compute polarization evolution and simulated polarizing optical micrographs; standard method but relies on the local uniaxial approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Space-time crystals from particle-like topological solitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CCOESAV5

@misc{pith2026250716972,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Space-time crystals from particle-like topological solitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CCOESAV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16972}
}
read the original abstract

Time crystals are unexpected states of matter that spontaneously break time translation symmetry either in a discrete or continuous manner. However, spatially-mesoscale space-time crystals that break both the space and time symmetries have not been reported. Here we report a continuous space-time crystal in a nematic liquid crystal driven by ambient-power, constant-intensity unstructured light. Our numerically constructed 4-dimensional configurations exhibit good agreement with these experimental findings. While meeting the established criteria to identify time-crystalline order, both experiments and computer simulations reveal a space-time crystallization phase formed by particle-like topological solitons. The robustness against temporal perturbations and spatiotemporal dislocations shows the stability and rigidity of the studied space-time crystals, which relates to their locally topological nature and many-body interactions between emergent spontaneously-twisted, particle-like solitonic building blocks. Their potential technological utility includes optical devices, photonic space-time crystal generators, telecommunications, and anti-counterfeiting designs, among others.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chaikin, P. M. & Lubensky, T. C. Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Yeh, P. & Gu, C. Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays. (Wiley, 2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Quantum Time Crystals

    Wilczek, F. Quantum Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    & Wilczek, F

    Shapere, A. & Wilczek, F. Classical Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Superfluidity and Space -Time Translation Symmetry Breaking

    Wilczek, F. Superfluidity and Space -Time Translation Symmetry Breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time Crystals: a No-Go Theorem

    Bruno, P. Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time Crystals: a No-Go Theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 070402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    & Oshikawa, M

    Watanabe, H. & Oshikawa, M. Absence of Quantum Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 251603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    & Zakrzewski, J

    Sacha, K. & Zakrzewski, J. Time Crystals: a Review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 016401 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Yao, N. Y. & Nayak, C. Time Crystals in Periodically Driven Systems. Phys. Today 71, 40–47 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    & Sondhi, S

    Khemani, V., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. A Brief History of Time Crystals. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.10745 (2019)

    2019 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Time Crystals

    Sacha, K. Time Crystals. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Phase Space Crystals: Condensed Matter in Dynamical Systems

    Guo, L. Phase Space Crystals: Condensed Matter in Dynamical Systems. (IOP Publishing, 2021). 35

    2021

  5. [13]

    Zaletel, M. P. et al. Colloquium : Quantum and Classical Discrete Time Crystals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 031001 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Modeling Spontaneous Breaking of Time-translation Symmetry

    Sacha, K. Modeling Spontaneous Breaking of Time-translation Symmetry. Phys. Rev. A 91, 033617 (2015). 15.Khemani, V., Lazarides, A., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016)

    2015

  7. [16]

    V., Bauer, B

    Else, D. V., Bauer, B. & Nayak, C. Floquet Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  8. [17]

    Y., Potter, A

    Yao, N. Y., Potter, A. C., Potirniche, I.-D. & Vishwanath, A. Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017)

    2017

  9. [18]

    Zhang, J. et al. Observation of a Discrete Time Crystal. Nature 543, 217–220 (2017)

    2017

  10. [19]

    Choi, S. et al. Observation of Discrete Time-crystalline Order in a Disordered Dipolar Many- body System. Nature 543, 221–225 (2017)

    2017

  11. [20]

    Smits, J., Liao, L., Stoof, H. T. C. & van der Straten, P. Observation of a Space-Time Crystal in a Superfluid Quantum Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 185301 (2018). 21.Liao, L., Smits, J., van der Straten, P. & Stoof, H. T. C. Dynamics of a Space-time Crystal in an Atomic Bose-Ein...

    2018

  12. [23]

    Randall, J. et al. Many-body–localized Discrete Time Crystal with a Programmable Spin-based Quantum Simulator. Science 374, 1474–1478 (2021)

    2021

  13. [24]

    Keß ler, H. et al. Observation of a Dissipative Time Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043602 36 (2021). 25.Taheri, H., Matsko, A. B., Maleki, L. & Sacha, K. All -optical Dissipative Discrete Time Crystals. Nat. Commun. 13, 848 (2022). 26.Taheri, H., Matsko, A. B., Herr, T. & Sac...

    2021

  14. [27]

    Mi, X. et al. Time-crystalline Eigenstate Order on a Quantum Processor. Nature 601, 531–536 (2022)

    2022

  15. [28]

    & Rachel, S

    Frey, P. & Rachel, S. Realization of a Discrete Time Crystal on 57 Qubits of a Quantum Computer. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm7652 (2022)

    2022

  16. [29]

    Kongkhambut, P. et al. Observation of a Continuous Time Crystal. Science 377, 670 –673 (2022)

    2022

  17. [30]

    Liu, T., Ou, J.-Y., MacDonald, K. F. & Zheludev, N. I. Photonic Metamaterial Analogue of a Continuous Time Crystal. Nat. Phys. 19, 986–991 (2023)

    2023

  18. [31]

    & Zhang, X

    Chen, Y.-H. & Zhang, X. Realization of an Inherent Time Crystal in a Dissipative Many-body System. Nat. Commun. 14, 6161 (2023)

    2023

  19. [32]

    Wu, X. et al. Dissipative Time Crystal in a Strongly Interacting Rydberg Gas. Nat. Phys. 20, 1389–1394 (2024)

    2024

  20. [33]

    Greilich, A. et al. Robust Continuous Time Crystal in an Electron–nuclear Spin System. Nat. Phys. 20, 631–636(2024)

    2024

  21. [34]

    Carraro-Haddad, I. et al. Solid-state Continuous Time Crystal in a Polariton Condensate with 37 a Built-in Mechanical Clock. Science 384, 995–1000 (2024)

    2024

  22. [35]

    J., Korblova, E., Walba, D

    Yi, Y., Farrow, M. J., Korblova, E., Walba, D. M. & Furtak, T. E. High -Sensitivity Aminoazobenzene Chemisorbed Monolayers for Photoalignment of Liquid Crystals. Langmuir 25, 997–1003 (2009)

    2009

  23. [36]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics. (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  24. [37]

    de Gennes, P. G. & Prost, J. The Physics of Liquid Crystals. (Clarendon Press, 1993)

    1993

  25. [38]

    Smalyukh, I. I. Review: Knots and Other New Topological Effects in Liquid Crystals and Colloids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 106601 (2020)

    2020

  26. [39]

    Zhao, H., Tai, J. -S. B., Wu, J. -S. & Smalyukh, I. I. Liquid Crystal Defect Structures with Mö bius Strip Topology. Nat. Phys. 19, 451–459 (2023). 40.Reichhardt, C., Reichhardt, C. J. O. & Milošević, M. V. Statics and Dynamics of Skyrmions Interacting with Disorder and Nanost...

    2023

  27. [42]

    Xu, S. & Wu, C. Space -Time Crystal and Space -Time Group. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 096401 (2018)

    2018

  28. [43]

    & Meerholz, K

    Gallego-Gó mez, F., del Monte, F. & Meerholz, K. Optical Gain by a Simple Photoisomerization Process. Nat. Mater. 7, 490–497 (2008). 44.Brener, E. A. & Marchenko, V. I. Nonlinear Theory of Dislocations in Smectic Crystals: An Exact Solution. Phys. Rev. E 59, R4752–R4753 (1999). 38

    2008

  29. [45]

    Sohn, H. R. O. & Smalyukh, I. I. Electrically Powered Motions of Toron Crystallites in Chiral Liquid Crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 6437–6445 (2020)

    2020

  30. [46]

    Time, Structure, and Fluctuations

    Prigogine, I. Time, Structure, and Fluctuations. Science 201, 777–785 (1978)

    1978

  31. [47]

    Zhang, R. et al. Spatiotemporal Control of Liquid Crystal Structure and Dynamics Through Activity Patterning. Nat. Mater. 20, 875–882 (2021)

    2021

  32. [48]

    Zhao, H., Malomed , B. A. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological Solitonic Macromolecules. Nat. Commun. 14, 4581 (2023). 49.Lee, Y. -H. et al. Recent Progress in Pancharatnam –Berry Phase Optical Elements and the Applications for Virtual/Augmented Realities. Opt. Data Process. Storage ...

    2023

  33. [53]

    & Mow, W

    Huang, W. & Mow, W. H. PiCode: 2D Barcode with Embedded Picture and ViCode: 3D Barcode with Embedded Video. In Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on Mobile computing & networking. 139-142 (2013)

    2013

  34. [54]

    Chang, S. et al. Electrical Tuning of Branched Flow of Light. Nat. Commun. 15, 197 (2024)

    2024

  35. [55]

    Poy, G. et al. Interaction and Co-assembly of Optical and Topological Solitons. Nat. Photonics 39 16, 454–461 (2022). Methods Materials and sample preparation The glass substrates are coated with photo-responsive material 2-(4-dimethylamino-phenylazo)- N-(3-triethoxysilane-pro...

    2022

  36. [56]

    Martinez, A., Mireles, H. C. & Smalyukh, I. I. Large-area Optoelastic Manipulation of Colloidal Particles in Liquid Crystals Using Photoresponsive Molecular Surface Monolayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 20891–20896 (2011)

    2011

  37. [57]

    Lee, T., Trivedi, R. P. & Smalyukh, I. I. Multimodal Nonlinear Optical Polarizing Microscopy of Long-range Molecular Order in Liquid Crystals. Opt. Lett. 35, 3447–3449 (2010). Additional Information: Supplementary Information is available for this paper. This Supplementary Inf...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.