Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Extending exciton and trion lifetimes in MoSe$_{2}$ with a nanoscale plasmonic cavity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A deep-subwavelength silver Fabry-Perot cavity suppresses radiative recombination of in-plane dipoles, narrowing MoSe2 exciton and trion photoluminescence lines by about 1 nm and extending their lifetimes by about 10 ps, with the effect…

desk verdict Good experiment, overreaching interpretation: the measured lifetime increase is too small to explain the observed linewidth narrowing, so the paper's central causality claim doesn't hold as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17879 v1 pith:DFQ44RK4 submitted 2025-07-23 cond-mat.mes-hall

Grace H. Chen , Anchita Addhya , Ian N. Hammock , Philip Kim , Alexander A. High This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords MoSe2excitonlifetimetrionFabry-PerotcavityPurcelleffectplasmoniclinewidthnarrowingtransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that placing a monolayer of MoSe2 inside a tightly confined planar silver Fabry-Perot cavity suppresses radiative recombination from bright excitons and trions, which are in-plane optical dipoles. The suppression appears as a consistent narrowing of photoluminescence linewidths, about 1 nm for both exciton and trion, together with a lifetime increase of roughly 10 ps. Etching away the top silver layer returns linewidths and lifetimes to their original values, indicating the effect is cavity-induced rather than a result of material damage. The significance is an all-optical route to extending excited-state lifetimes in 2D semiconductors without separating electrons and holes, which would normally reduce binding energy.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a deep-subwavelength planar metallic Fabry-Perot cavity in which the cavity thickness is below half the emission wavelength, so the in-plane electric field of the cavity mode vanishes. Because bright excitons and trions in MoSe2 are in-plane optical dipoles, this node suppresses their radiative recombination, while an out-of-plane dipole in the same cavity experiences enhanced spontaneous emission. The cavity is realized as a bottom single-crystalline silver film, a bottom hBN layer, the MoSe2 monolayer, a top hBN layer, an exfoliated mica spacer, and a top polycrystalline silver layer, with thicknesses chosen by parameter sweeps of the simulated Purcell factor.

What would settle it

Deposit the top silver layer on the same encapsulated MoSe2 but with a spacer thick enough that the in-plane cavity field does not vanish, and observe whether the ~1 nm linewidth narrowing and ~10 ps trion lifetime increase persist; if they persist, cavity suppression is not the cause. Alternatively, repeat the lifetime measurement with a single-photon detector fast enough to resolve the pre-Ag exciton decay; if the pre-Ag exciton lifetime is not actually shorter than the post-Ag value, the claimed lifetime increase is an instrument artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Encapsulating monolayer MoSe2 between a single-crystalline bottom silver mirror and a polycrystalline top silver layer, with hBN and mica spacers chosen by FDTD simulations to minimize the Purcell factor, suppresses emission from in-plane optical dipoles. Measured average exciton linewidths decrease from 3.53 ± 0.82 meV to 1.32 ± 0.31 meV, and trion linewidths from 2.61 ± 0.58 meV to 2.01 ± 0.20 meV, with a blue shift of about 3.8 meV for excitons and 3.6 meV for trions interpreted as a cavity-induced cooperative Lamb shift. Exciton lifetimes rise above the instrument response to roughly 9 ps, trion lifetimes increase by about 10 ps from a pre-cavity value of about 59 ps, and removing the top silver restores the original spectra and lifetimes. The paper concludes that a deep-subwavelength metallic cavity can directly engineer the radiative lifetime of intra-layer excitons and trions while preserving their large binding energy.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on interpreting the ~1 nm photoluminescence linewidth narrowing as homogeneous lifetime broadening; if strain, doping, or inhomogeneous broadening introduced by the top silver layer causes the narrowing, the lifetime increase would not be established, especially for excitons whose pre-Ag decay sits below the instrument response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Longer intra-layer exciton and trion lifetimes give more time for thermalization, valley-polarization preservation, and coherent control before decay, which is useful for valleytronic and optoelectronic devices.
  • Suppressing the bright in-plane emission selectively enhances the relative visibility of out-of-plane dark excitons, offering a path to studying optically dark states in MoSe2.
  • The cavity-induced blue shift and linewidth narrowing provide a reversible, all-optical way to tune emission energy and line shape, with the etch-back step demonstrating that the effect can be switched off and on.
  • The same cavity geometry can be applied to other in-plane-dipole emitters in van der Waals stacks, including long-lived interlayer excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers, to further extend their lifetimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct measurement of the pre-cavity exciton decay with a faster single-photon detector or streak camera would test whether the inferred exciton lifetime increase is real, since the pre-Ag exciton decay currently sits below the instrument response.
  • If the linewidth narrowing is genuinely homogeneous lifetime broadening, the same cavity should narrow the homogeneous lines of other in-plane-dipole emitters embedded in the structure, which is a testable extension to WSe2 or WS2 monolayers.
  • The observed lifetime enhancement is smaller than the simulated Purcell suppression predicts; reducing disorder and non-radiative recombination pathways should increase the achievable lifetime extension, a prediction the paper gestures toward but does not demonstrate.
  • Because the cavity enhances out-of-plane dipoles, the same device could act as a spectral and spatial filter that routes dark-exciton emission to the far field, converting a suppression effect into a detection tool.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that placing monolayer MoSe2 in a deep-subwavelength planar silver Fabry-Pérot cavity suppresses radiative recombination of in-plane optical dipoles, leading to a ~1 nm narrowing of exciton and trion photoluminescence (PL) linewidths, a blue-shift of the peak energies, and a ~10 ps increase in trion lifetime, with the exciton lifetime rising above the instrument response function (~9 ps) after cavity integration. Etching away the top silver reverses these changes, which the authors interpret as evidence that the effects arise purely from exciton–cavity interactions. FDTD simulations are used to select spacer thicknesses that minimize the Purcell factor. The paper concludes that the cavity extends exciton and trion lifetimes, with potential applications to dark-exciton studies and optoelectronic devices.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide a broadly applicable, all-optical route to extending exciton and trion lifetimes in monolayer TMDs without sacrificing binding energy, which is relevant for valleytronics, exciton transport, and studies of optically dark excitons. The experimental design has notable strengths: a multi-stage etch-back control demonstrating reversibility, statistics over seven spatial points for linewidth changes, and FDTD simulations that are not fit to the measured lifetimes. The manuscript also explicitly acknowledges that the observed lifetime enhancement is much smaller than predicted. However, the quantitative relationship between the reported linewidth narrowing and lifetime increase is inconsistent, which undermines the central attribution. The significance of the work therefore depends on whether the authors can provide direct lifetime evidence and reconcile this discrepancy.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main Text, Figures 2 and 3] The reported linewidth narrowing is quantitatively incompatible with the measured lifetime increase, so the central attribution cannot be sustained. For trions, the average FWHM decreases from 2.61 ± 0.58 meV to 2.01 ± 0.20 meV (≈0.60 meV), while the lifetime increases from 59 ps to ≈69 ps. If the linewidth were homogeneously lifetime-broadened, the expected change would be ΔΓ = ħ(1/τ_pre − 1/τ_post) = 0.658 meV·ps × (1/59 − 1/69) ≈ 1.6 μeV, roughly 400 times smaller than the observed 0.60 meV narrowing. Similarly, the post-Ag exciton linewidth is 1.32 meV, whereas the homogeneous width from the measured 9 ps lifetime is 0.073 meV; the linewidth is therefore not lifetime-limited even after cavity integration. Consequently, the observed narrowing cannot be caused by the reported lifetime increase and must instead arise from cavity-induced changes in strain, doping, screening, or inhomogeneous broadening. This directly contradicts the statement in the main text: "We attribute the linewidth narrowing to an increase in the exciton and trion lifetimes."
  2. [Main Text, Figure 3] The claimed exciton lifetime increase is inferred, not measured. The pre-Ag exciton decay coincides with the instrument response function, so no pre-Ag lifetime value is obtained; the post-Ag value of ~9 ps is measured directly. The only basis for claiming an increase is the linewidth narrowing, but as shown in the previous comment, that narrowing cannot be quantitatively explained by a lifetime change. Thus the exciton lifetime-extension claim lacks direct experimental support and loses its main evidence.
  3. [Main Text, Figure 3] The trion lifetime increase of ~10 ps is reported without uncertainty or statistical significance. Although Figure 3c shows a distribution across seven points, no error bars are given for the individual lifetime fits or for the increase. Given the pre-Ag baseline of 59 ps, a 10 ps change could plausibly fall within systematic drift, excitation-power variations, or fit uncertainty. The authors should report the uncertainties on the fitted lifetimes and perform a statistical test (e.g., a paired t-test) to demonstrate that the increase is significant.
  4. [Main Text, 'We speculate...'] The paper does not rule out strain or doping as alternative explanations for the observed spectral changes. Deposition of the top Ag layer could introduce strain or charge transfer that narrows PL lines and blue-shifts peaks, and the etch-back control only demonstrates reversibility, not the radiative-suppression mechanism. The authors should either provide measurements that exclude these effects (e.g., Raman spectroscopy for strain, transport or reflectance for doping) or frame the claims more cautiously. This is load-bearing because the title and abstract assert that the cavity suppresses radiative recombination, yet the quantitative mismatch in comment 1 already indicates that non-radiative or environmental effects dominate the linewidth changes.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence "etching back the top silver layer returns the PL linewidth and lifetimes return to their original values" contains a grammatical error; it should read "returns the PL linewidth and lifetimes to their original values."
  2. [Main Text, Figure 2] Figure 2f shows the distribution of linewidth reductions but does not include the individual data points or uncertainties on the fitted linewidths; adding these would make the statistics more transparent.
  3. [Methods, Optical Measurements] The IRF width is not specified numerically. Since the exciton lifetime claim rests on the pre-Ag decay being below the IRF, the authors should state the IRF FWHM so readers can judge the detection limit.
  4. [Main Text] There are several typographical errors, including "largeoscillator" (should be "large oscillator") and "depositon" (should be "deposition").
  5. [References] The reference formatting is inconsistent: some entries include titles while others do not (e.g., refs. 20, 26, 28). The authors should standardize the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cavity design is guided by FDTD but the observed lifetimes are not fitted to that simulation, and no observable is defined in terms of another.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report. The claimed suppression mechanism is supported by an independent prior calculation (Ref. 22) of in-plane dipoles in a metallic Fabry-Pérot cavity; that calculation is not fitted to the present data, and the authors explicitly acknowledge that the observed lifetime enhancement is smaller than predicted ('We note that the degree of lifetime enhancement is less than predicted by theory and simulation'), so the prediction could have been falsified. The FDTD simulations were used only to select top hBN/mica thicknesses from the Purcell factor, not to set the measured linewidths or lifetimes, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction step. Trion lifetimes were measured before (59 ps) and after (~69 ps) Ag deposition, and PL linewidths were fit independently to Lorentzians. The linewidth narrowing is attributed to lifetime change, but neither quantity is defined by the other, so the quantitative inconsistency between the ~1 nm narrowing and ~10 ps lifetime change is a physics/correctness concern (e.g., inhomogeneous broadening, strain, doping), not a circularity. The pre-Ag exciton lifetime is explicitly below the instrument response ('the exciton lifetime coincides with the IRF'), which limits evidence for an exciton lifetime increase but does not make the claim circular. The only self-citation for the mechanism (Ref. 22) is an externally published theoretical result with stated assumptions, not a self-imported uniqueness theorem, and the present data are not used to verify it by construction. No equation or fitted parameter equals the claimed result by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the data. The paper relies on three domain assumptions: the dipole-FDTD design model, the homogeneous-broadening interpretation of linewidths, and the purity of the etch-back control. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption In-plane point-dipole Purcell model computed by FDTD correctly represents the suppression for delocalized excitons; the authors note it is an upper bound.
    Used to choose hBN and mica thicknesses for maximum Purcell suppression; if the point dipole model is not representative of the extended exciton wavefunction, the designed cavity may not suppress emission as calculated.
  • domain assumption The Lorentzian PL linewidth is homogeneously broadened, so linewidth narrowing directly implies a lifetime increase.
    Explicitly invoked in the sentence 'We attribute the linewidth narrowing to an increase in the exciton and trion lifetimes'; inhomogeneous broadening would break this link.
  • domain assumption Depositing and later etching the 40 nm polycrystalline silver layer does not change the MoSe2 non-radiative decay, strain, or doping, making the control experiment a test of purely photonic effects.
    Underlies the statement 'We confirm that this effect is due to the addition of the top silver'; no strain or doping characterization is reported.
  • domain assumption Optical constants of Ag, hBN, and mica used in FDTD are accurate at 4 K and near the exciton wavelength.
    The cavity design and the expected Purcell factor depend on these constants; the paper does not validate them independently.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extending exciton and trion lifetimes in MoSe$_{2}$ with a nanoscale plasmonic cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DFQ44RK4

@misc{pith2026250717879,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extending exciton and trion lifetimes in MoSe$_2$ with a nanoscale plasmonic cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DFQ44RK4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17879}
}
abstract

Excitons in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have extremely short, picosecond-scale lifetimes which hinders exciton thermalization, limits the emergence of collective coherence, and reduces exciton transport in optoelectronic devices. In this work, we explore an all-optical pathway to extend exciton lifetimes by placing MoSe$_2$ in a deep-subwavelength Fabry-Perot silver cavity. The cavity structure is designed to suppress radiative recombination from in-plane optical dipoles, such as bright excitons and trions. We observe a consistent decrease in photoluminescence (PL) linewidths of excitons and trions (~1 nm), along with a corresponding lifetime increase (~10 ps). We confirm the experimental observations arise purely from exciton-cavity interactions-etching back the top silver layer returns the PL linewidth and lifetimes return to their original values. Our study offers a pathway to engineer excited state lifetimes in 2D materials which can be utilized for studies of optically dark excitons and have potential applications for novel optoelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17879 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MoSe2 Cavity simulations and fabrication. (a) Schematic of emission suppression with Ag cavity. (b) Single-crystalline Ag growth on mica substrate. (c,d) Simulated Purcell factors for identifying target thicknesses of top hBN (dtopBN ) and mica (dmica) layer for max￾imum suppression of PL emission (c) without Ag cavity and (d) with Ag cavity. Simulations used a bottom hBN layer of 48nm. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Change in emission spectra of excitons and trions post Ag growth (a,b) Dark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of Ag growth and removal (a) Increase in exciton lifetime overlaid with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS 2 and Other Group - VI Dichalcogenides

    Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS 2 and Other Group - VI Dichalcogenides . Physical Review Letters 2012, 108, 196802

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    F.; He, K.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T

    Mak, K. F.; He, K.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nature Nanotechnology 2012, 7, 494--498

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    F.; Shan, J

    Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Photonics 2016, 10, 216--226

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    V.; Kis, A

    Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O. V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Reviews Materials 2017, 2, 17033

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    F.; He, K.; Lee, C.; Lee, G

    Mak, K. F.; He, K.; Lee, C.; Lee, G. H.; Hone, J.; Heinz, T. F.; Shan, J. Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2 . Nature Materials 2013, 12, 207--211

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors

    Sidler, M.; Back, P.; Cotlet, O.; Srivastava, A.; Fink, T.; Kroner, M.; Demler, E.; Imamoglu, A. Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors. Nature Physics 2017, 13, 255--261

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Hone, J

    Wang, Z.; Rhodes, D. A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Hone, J. C.; Shan, J.; Mak, K. F. Evidence of high-temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers. Nature 2019, 574, 76--80

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    X.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; MacDonald, A

    Ma, L.; Nguyen, P. X.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; MacDonald, A. H.; Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers. Nature 2021, 598, 585--589

    work page 2021

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Zheng, T.; Feng, Q.; Xie, J.; Regan, E.; Lu, Z.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Tongay, S.; Crommie, M

    Qi, R.; Joe, A. Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Zheng, T.; Feng, Q.; Xie, J.; Regan, E.; Lu, Z.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Tongay, S.; Crommie, M. F.; MacDonald, A. H.; Wang, F. Thermodynamic behavior of correlated electron-hole fluids in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature Com...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, J.; Feng, Q.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Tongay, S.; Wang, F

    Qi, R.; Joe, A. Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, J.; Feng, Q.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Tongay, S.; Wang, F. Perfect Coulomb drag and exciton transport in an excitonic insulator. 2025,

    2025

  3. [11]

    X.; Ma, L.; Chaturvedi, R.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Shan, J.; Mak, K

    Nguyen, P. X.; Ma, L.; Chaturvedi, R.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Shan, J.; Mak, K. F. Perfect Coulomb drag in a dipolar excitonic insulator. 2025,

    2025

  4. [12]

    Jauregui, L. A. et al. Electrical control of interlayer exciton dynamics in atomically thin heterostructures. 2019,

    2019

  5. [13]

    Joe, A. Y. et al. Electrically controlled emission from singlet and triplet exciton species in atomically thin light-emitting diodes. Physical Review B 2021, 103, L161411

    2021

  6. [14]

    Y.; Zhang, L.; Burg, G

    Paik, E. Y.; Zhang, L.; Burg, G. W.; Gogna, R.; Tutuc, E.; Deng, H. Interlayer exciton laser of extended spatial coherence in atomically thin heterostructures. Nature 2019, 576, 80--84

    2019

  7. [15]

    Valley dynamics probed through charged and neutral exciton emission in monolayer WSe 2

    Wang, G.; Bouet, L.; Lagarde, D.; Vidal, M.; Balocchi, A.; Amand, T.; Marie, X.; Urbaszek, B. Valley dynamics probed through charged and neutral exciton emission in monolayer WSe 2. Physical Review B 2014, 90, 075413

    2014

  8. [16]

    Exciton radiative lifetime in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers

    Robert, C.; Lagarde, D.; Cadiz, F.; Wang, G.; Lassagne, B.; Amand, T.; Balocchi, A.; Renucci, P.; Tongay, S.; Urbaszek, B.; Marie, X. Exciton radiative lifetime in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Physical Review B 2016, 93, 205423

    2016

  9. [17]

    C.; Hill, H

    Chernikov, A.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Hill, H. M.; Rigosi, A.; Li, Y.; Aslan, B.; Reichman, D. R.; Hybertsen, M. S.; Heinz, T. F. Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WS 2. Physical Review Letters 2014, 113, 076802

    2014

  10. [18]

    S.; High, A

    Zhou, Y.; Scuri, G.; Wild, D. S.; High, A. A.; Dibos, A.; Jauregui, L. A.; Shu, C.; De Greve, K.; Pistunova, K.; Joe, A. Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kim, P.; Lukin, M. D.; Park, H. Probing dark excitons in atomically thin semiconductors via near-field coupling to surface ...

    2017

  11. [19]

    V.; Finley, J

    Qian, C.; Villafañe, V.; Soubelet, P.; Ji, P.; Stier, A. V.; Finley, J. J. Probing Dark Excitons in Monolayer MoS2 by Nonlinear Two - Photon Spectroscopy . Physical Review Letters 2024, 133, Publisher: American Physical Society (APS)

    2024

  12. [20]

    R.; Deng, H

    Zhang, L.; Wu, F.; Hou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Chou, Y.-H.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Forrest, S. R.; Deng, H. Van der Waals heterostructure polaritons with moiré-induced nonlinearity. Nature 2021, 591, 61--65

    2021

  13. [21]

    Shan, H. et al. Brightening of a dark monolayer semiconductor via strong light-matter coupling in a cavity. Nature Communications 2022, 13, Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

    2022

  14. [22]

    H.; Li, D

    Chen, G. H.; Li, D. Z.; Butcher, A.; High, A. A.; Chang, D. E. Engineering the radiative dynamics of thermalized excitons with metal interfaces. New Journal of Physics 2022, 24, 023015

    2022

  15. [23]

    Engineering radiative coupling of excitons in 2D semiconductors

    Horng, J.; Chou, Y.-H.; Chang, T.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Lu, T.-C.; Deng, H. Engineering radiative coupling of excitons in 2D semiconductors. Optica 2019, 6, 1443

    2019

  16. [24]

    Coherent feedback control of two-dimensional excitons

    Rogers, C.; Gray, D.; Bogdanowicz, N.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Mabuchi, H. Coherent feedback control of two-dimensional excitons. Physical Review Research 2020, 2, 012029

    2020

  17. [25]

    Control of the Bright - Dark Exciton Splitting Using the Lamb Shift in a Two - Dimensional Semiconductor

    Ren, L.; Robert, C.; Glazov, M.; Semina, M.; Amand, T.; Lombez, L.; Lagarde, D.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Marie, X. Control of the Bright - Dark Exciton Splitting Using the Lamb Shift in a Two - Dimensional Semiconductor . Physical Review Letters 2023, 131, 116901

    2023

  18. [26]

    D.; Winn, J

    Joannopoulos, J. D.; Winn, J. N.; Johnson, S. G. Photonic Crystals : Molding the Flow of Light - Second Edition ; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Epitaxial Growth of Optically Thick , Single Crystalline Silver Films for Plasmonics

    Cheng, F.; Lee, C.-J.; Choi, J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Gwo, S.; Chang, W.-H.; Li, X.; Shih, C.-K. Epitaxial Growth of Optically Thick , Single Crystalline Silver Films for Plasmonics . ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11, 3189--3195, Publisher: American Ch...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Naturally occurring van der Waals materials

    Frisenda, R.; Niu, Y.; Gant, P.; Muñoz, M.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Naturally occurring van der Waals materials. npj 2D Materials and Applications 2020, 4, Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

    2020

  21. [29]

    J.; Rubio‐Bollinger, G

    Castellanos‐Gomez, A.; Wojtaszek, M.; Tombros, N.; Agraït, N.; Van Wees, B. J.; Rubio‐Bollinger, G. Atomically Thin Mica Flakes and Their Application as Ultrathin Insulating Substrates for Graphene . Small 2011, 7, 2491--2497, Publisher: Wiley

    2011

  22. [30]

    C.; Van Der Laan, M.; Poonia, D.; Maiti, S.; Kinge, S.; Siebbeles, L

    Gillespie, S. C.; Van Der Laan, M.; Poonia, D.; Maiti, S.; Kinge, S.; Siebbeles, L. D. A.; Schall, P. Optical signatures of charge- and energy transfer in TMDC / TMDC and TMDC /perovskite heterostructures. 2D Materials 2024, 11, 022005

    2024

  23. [31]

    Control of the Exciton Radiative Lifetime in van der Waals Heterostructures

    Fang, H.; Han, B.; Robert, C.; Semina, M.; Lagarde, D.; Courtade, E.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Amand, T.; Urbaszek, B.; Glazov, M.; Marie, X. Control of the Exciton Radiative Lifetime in van der Waals Heterostructures . Physical Review Letters 2019, 123, 067401

    2019

  24. [32]

    Valley Two - Qubit System in a MoS2 - Monolayer Gated Double Quantum dot

    Pawłowski, J.; Bieniek, M.; Woźniak, T. Valley Two - Qubit System in a MoS2 - Monolayer Gated Double Quantum dot. Physical Review Applied 2021, 15, Publisher: American Physical Society (APS)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Valley-addressable monolayer lasing through spin-controlled Berry phase photonic cavities

    Duan, X.; Wang, B.; Rong, K.; Liu, C.-l.; Gorovoy, V.; Mukherjee, S.; Kleiner, V.; Koren, E.; Hasman, E. Valley-addressable monolayer lasing through spin-controlled Berry phase photonic cavities. Science 2023, 381, 1429--1432, Publisher: American Association for the Advancemen...

    2023

  26. [34]

    R.; Bartos, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Urbaszek, B.; Potemski, M.; Marie, X

    Robert, C.; Han, B.; Kapuscinski, P.; Delhomme, A.; Faugeras, C.; Amand, T.; Molas, M. R.; Bartos, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Urbaszek, B.; Potemski, M.; Marie, X. Measurement of the spin-forbidden dark excitons in MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers. Nature Communications 2020, 1...

    2020

  27. [35]

    H.; Ambwani, P.; Manno, M.; Lindquist, N

    Park, J. H.; Ambwani, P.; Manno, M.; Lindquist, N. C.; Nagpal, P.; Oh, S.; Leighton, C.; Norris, D. J. Single‐ Crystalline Silver Films for Plasmonics . Advanced Materials 2012, 24, 3988--3992

    2012

  28. [36]

    Characterization of semiconductor devices and wafer materials via sub-nanosecond time-correlated single-photon counting

    Buschmann, V.; Hempel, H.; Knigge, A.; Kraft, C.; Roczen, M.; Weyers, M.; Siebert, T.; Koberling, F. Characterization of semiconductor devices and wafer materials via sub-nanosecond time-correlated single-photon counting. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy 2013, 80, 449--457 mcit...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.