Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 59 references

Quantum Fisher Information in Curved Spacetime: Dirac Particles in Noisy Channels around a Schwarzschild Black Hole

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A paper argues that strong squeezing makes three-qubit Dirac QFI immune to Hawking-temperature variation while channel heat still degrades it.

desk verdict The paper's new combination of SGAD noise and Schwarzschild Hawking background is undone by a non-Hermitian density matrix (Eq. 17) and non-real 'eigenvalues' (Eq. 19), so the central squeezing-robustness claim is unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17901 v1 pith:NT5SGKQ7 submitted 2025-07-23 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Cookey Iyen , Muhammad Sanusi Liman , Benedict O. Ayomanor , Emem-obong Solomon James , Yame Mwanzang Philemon , Babatunde James Falaye This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords QuantumFisherInformationDiracsystemSqueezedgeneralizedamplitudedampingHawkingradiationSchwarzschildblackholedecoherencemetrologyKruskalvacuum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies how dissipative quantum noise and Hawking radiation from a Schwarzschild black hole together degrade the quantum Fisher information (QFI) of a three-qubit entangled Dirac state. Its central claim is that strong squeezing in the squeezed generalized amplitude damping (SGAD) channel, at $r=1$, makes the QFI for the entanglement weight parameter $\theta$ completely insensitive to the Hawking temperature $T_H$, while the channel temperature $T_C$ still erodes the QFI. The decay with $T_C$ is reported to be significantly slower at $r=1$ than at $r=0$, so the paper proposes squeezing as an error-mitigation strategy in curved spacetime. For the phase parameter $\phi$, the paper reports a sharp transient spike in QFI at $T_C=2$ that is independent of $T_H$. A sympathetic reader would take these as concrete predictions: squeezing protects one estimation parameter from gravitational decoherence, and local channel heat, not Hawking radiation, is the dominant enemy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spectrum decomposition of the three-qubit reduced density matrix after the SGAD, GAD, or AD channel and after tracing out the interior of the black hole. The authors compute QFI as $\sum_i p_i^{-1}(\partial_\lambda p_i)^2$ plus the pure-state and eigenvector-derivative terms of Eq. (1), so the whole argument turns on which eigenvalues survive and how they depend on the channel and Hawking parameters. The Hawking temperature enters through Bogoliubov coefficients connecting Schwarzschild and Kruskal modes, while the SGAD Kraus operators carry the squeezing parameter $r$ and phase $\Phi$. The claimed $T_H$-immunity at $r=1$ comes from a cancellation in the eigenvalue combination that multiplies the Hawking-dependent factors, leaving only the channel-temperature terms.

What would settle it

Recompute the eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix with correctly conjugated entries, $|A|^2$, $AB^*$, and $|B|^2$, and check whether all eigenvalues are real and nonnegative; if some are negative, the QFI curves cannot come from a valid state. Separately, compute the $\theta$-QFI at $r=1$ for any $\theta>0$: the text says it becomes singular there, so the robustness claim would be restricted to the single point $\theta=0$ unless a finite-$\theta$ calculation shows otherwise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from a three-qubit state $|\chi\rangle_{ABC} = \cos\theta\,|000\rangle + \sin\theta\, e^{i\phi}|111\rangle$, the authors let the first two qubits pass through a squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel and couple the third qubit to the Kruskal vacuum of a Schwarzschild black hole, then trace out the horizon-interior mode. They write the accessible reduced density matrix, extract its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and insert them into the spectral decomposition of QFI in Eq. (1). The main result is that at squeezing parameter $r=1$ and weight $\theta=0$, the $\theta$-QFI in the SGAD channel is exactly invariant under changes in Hawking temperature $T_H$, while it still decreases and saturates with channel temperature $T_C$; the $T_C$ decay is slower at $r=1$ than at $r=0$. In the GAD channel, the same QFI first rises and plateaus with $T_C$ while $T_H$ suppresses it; in the AD channel, the $\theta$-QFI recovers at high damping parameter $\lambda$ when $T_H$ is low but stays suppressed when $T_H$ is high. For the phase $\phi$, all three channels show a sharp spike in QFI at $T_C=2$ that is independent of $T_H$, interpreted as thermal resonance or non-monotonic decoherence.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation stands on the reduced density matrix of Eq. (17) being a legitimate quantum state with real probabilities, but the matrix is written with products like $AB$ where the complex conjugates would be needed, leaving eigenvalues that carry complex phases such as $e^{2i\Phi}$; if that matrix is not a valid Hermitian state, the reported QFI behavior does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claimed invariance is correct, squeezing a quantum channel at $r=1$ would preserve the estimability of the entanglement weight parameter near a black hole horizon, regardless of how Hawking temperature changes with black-hole mass.
  • The reported dominance of $T_C$ over $T_H$ across the SGAD, GAD, and AD channels implies that suppressing local thermal noise in the channel is more urgent for quantum communication near a black hole than shielding from Hawking radiation itself.
  • The phase-QFI spike at $T_C=2$ offers a specific operating temperature at which phase estimation temporarily revives, and since it is $T_H$-independent it should occur equally for a black-hole-free Minkowski setup.
  • In the AD channel, the recovery of $\theta$-QFI at large damping $\lambda$ for low Hawking temperature suggests that decoherence can be partially reversible; the same recovery disappears at high $T_H$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A corrected Hermitian version of Eq. (17) might change the eigenvalue phases and the exact form of the $\theta$-QFI, so a natural next step is to recompute the reported $T_H$-independence with $|A|^2$, $AB^*$, and $|B|^2$ matrix elements.
  • The strong-squeezing immunity is demonstrated only at $\theta=0$; extending it to small nonzero weights and investigating the singularity at $\theta>0$ would determine whether the error-mitigation strategy is practical or confined to a measure-zero parameter set.
  • The same three-qubit-plus-Kruskal construction could be applied to dephasing and depolarizing channels; if the pattern of $T_C$ dominance persists, it would suggest that local channel parameters generically outweigh gravitational decoherence for QFI, not just for amplitude-damping-type noise.
  • Because the Hawking temperature of astrophysical black holes is tiny, direct tests would likely need analogue-gravity experiments or microscopic black-hole analogues; the predicted spike at $T_C=2$ is the most readily testable feature in a laboratory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the quantum Fisher information (QFI) for a three-qubit entangled Dirac state, with Alice and Bob coupled to a squeezed generalized amplitude damping (SGAD) channel and Caleb's qubit subject to Hawking radiation in a Schwarzschild spacetime. It derives explicit formulas for the QFI with respect to the weight parameter θ and the phase parameter φ under SGAD, GAD, and AD channels. The central claims are that at strong squeezing r=1 the θ-QFI becomes completely robust against the Hawking temperature T_H while still degrading with channel temperature T_C, and that the φ-QFI exhibits a transient spike at T_C=2 that is independent of T_H. The paper concludes that squeezing can serve as an error-mitigation strategy in curved spacetime.

Significance. If correct, the work would extend QFI-based metrology to squeezed thermal channels in a black-hole spacetime and would identify a practical, squeezing-based protection mechanism against relativistic decoherence. The use of standard channel models (SGAD, GAD, AD) and a known Bogoliubov treatment of the Schwarzschild vacuum gives the paper a plausible framework, and the explicit QFI formulas are of a form that could be checked by other groups. However, the central derivation is invalid: the reduced density matrix used for the spectral decomposition is not Hermitian, so the eigenvalue-based QFI formulas and all subsequent claims are not established. The paper also explicitly concedes that the r=1 regime is singular for θ>0, which undermines the headline robustness claim in the entangled regime.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1.2, Eq. (17)] The reduced density matrix ρ_abc1 in Eq. (17) is not Hermitian. With A = sinθ e^{iφ}, the diagonal coefficient A² is not real (unless φ=0 or π), and the two off-diagonal coefficients are both written as AB instead of AB* and (AB)*. The same defect carries into Eq. (18), where the |011><011| diagonal term contains e^{2iΦ}. Consequently, the quantities listed in Eq. (19) are not eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator; for example, the first listed 'eigenvalue' contains the complex phase e^{2iΦ} and the second contains e^{2iφ} through A². Since Eq. (1) requires a Hermitian spectral decomposition with real probabilities p_i, the QFI expressions in Eqs. (21), (22), (25), (26), (28), and (29) and all figures derived from them are built on an invalid basis. This is load-bearing for every quantitative claim in the paper.
  2. [§5.1.2, Figures 3–5] The central claim that at r=1 the θ-QFI becomes completely resistant to the Hawking temperature is not supported even if the Hermiticity issue is set aside. The manuscript states explicitly that 'when r = 1, the QFI becomes ill-defined or singular for θ > 0' (after Figure 4), and the robustness is demonstrated only at θ=0. At θ=0 the initial state |χ⟩ = |000⟩ is a product state, so the claimed 'error mitigation' of quantum information in an entangled system is vacuous in the regime where the claim is actually computed. The assertion that squeezing protects QFI for entangled Dirac states requires a well-defined nonsingular QFI at θ>0, which the paper explicitly concedes it does not have.
  3. [§5.1.2, Eq. (21) and Figure 6] The transient spike in F_φ^SGAD at T_C=2 is suspect because it arises from formulas that divide by the non-real 'eigenvalue' expressions of Eq. (19), which can vanish or become arbitrarily small for particular parameter values. Since the spectral decomposition used to derive these formulas is invalid, the spike cannot be distinguished from an artifact of a near-zero denominator. The claim that this spike is independent of T_H therefore rests on the same invalid foundation. A concrete way to test this would be to recompute the QFI from a correctly Hermitian reduced state (using |A|² and AB* terms) and to check whether a spike at T_C=2 survives.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.1.2, Eq. (19)] The eigenvalues in Eq. (19) are written with ket notation, |e_i⟩, even though they are scalars; this is confusing and should be corrected, e.g., using λ_i or p_i.
  2. [§5.1.2, Eq. (20)] The eigenvectors in Eq. (20) are not normalized; for example, the state |Θ2⟩ has norm √( |A/B arλ|² + 1 ), not 1. This matters for applying the third term of Eq. (1), which requires an orthonormal spectrum.
  3. [§5.1.2, Figure 5 bullets] The bullet 'At θ = 0◦, θSGAD is nearly invariant' appears to mean 'F_θ^SGAD is nearly invariant'; the symbol θSGAD is undefined.
  4. [Introduction] The introduction states 'In section 5.1 we investigate...' before Section 4 is discussed; the ordering should be 'In Section 2 ... Section 4 ... Section 5'.
  5. [§6] The conclusion says 'The methodology used in this research and the results are in agreement with other similar works carried out by other authors [58, 59]' without specifying which results are compared or how the comparison is made; this statement is unsupported.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QFI is computed by substitution from standard SGAD Kraus operators and Kruskal-vacuum Bogoliubov coefficients; the self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain. The initial state Eq. (15) is an explicit three-qubit ansatz with parameters θ and φ; the SGAD Kraus operators Eq. (13) and channel parameters Eq. (14) are taken from the cited literature [55,56], and the GAD channel is obtained from the SGAD channel by substitution (Φ→0, μ→0, v→λ) rather than by importing a conclusion. The Kruskal-vacuum state Eq. (12) is the standard Damour-Ruffini result, and the reduced density matrix Eq. (17) plus channel-evolved matrix Eq. (18) are computed by explicit substitution and tracing. The eigenvalues in Eq. (19) are then inserted into the standard QFI formula Eq. (1); no parameter is fitted to data and no external benchmark is predicted from a fit. The paper's self-citations [4,32,53] are contextual and are not used as a load-bearing premise; the channel model is independently specified with external references. The main problems are mathematical, not circular: Eq. (17) writes combinations such as A², AB, B², and F² without complex conjugation, so the matrix is not guaranteed Hermitian, and the quantities listed in Eq. (19) are not necessarily eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator. This invalidates the subsequent QFI formulas and figures, but it is a correctness risk rather than a circularity. The manuscript also concedes that at r=1 the QFI becomes ill-defined or singular for θ>0, which limits the central robustness claim to θ=0; again, this is a validity limitation, not circular reasoning. Overall, the derivation is self-contained with respect to its stated inputs, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. It relies on standard quantum channel theory and a single-mode approximation for Hawking radiation. The main unaccounted inputs are the unspecified channel parameters (gamma_0, omega) and the unregularized use of the QFI formula with zero eigenvalues.

free parameters (4)
  • Squeezing parameter r = 0 and 1
    Central claim depends on r=1; values chosen by hand for the plots. No justification for why r=1 is the physical regime.
  • Channel temperature T_C = Varied, with a spike at T_C=2
    T_C enters through the thermal occupation N; the choice of T_C=2 as the spike location is a consequence of the (flawed) formula, not a measured value.
  • Hawking temperature T_H = Varied; set via black hole mass M
    T_H = (8pi M)^(-1) with M varied. The paper varies T_H to show robustness, but this is an input, not a fitted parameter.
  • AD noise parameter lambda and channel coupling gamma_0 = Not explicitly specified
    The Kraus parameters lambda, mu, v depend on gamma_0 and omega, but their numerical values in the figures are not reported, so the plots cannot be reproduced.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quantum Fisher information formula Eq. (1) applies to the mixed state even when some eigenvalues p_i are zero, with the 1/p_i terms treated without a support restriction.
    The paper uses Eq. (1) directly on eigenvalues that include zeros and near-zeros, which can produce spurious divergences (e.g., the T_C=2 spike).
  • domain assumption The Kruskal vacuum / Bogoliubov transformation in Eq. (12) correctly describes the Hawking effect for a single Dirac mode and that tracing over the black hole interior yields Eq. (17).
    This is a standard single-mode approximation in the literature, but the paper does not justify its extension to the three-qubit setting where only Caleb's mode is transformed.
  • standard math The SGAD channel and its Kraus operators (Eq. 13) from Srikanth and Banerjee [57] accurately model the noise on Alice and Bob's qubits.
    Imported from cited literature; standard in quantum information.
  • domain assumption Natural units with G=c=hbar=k_B=1 and the identification of T = (8pi M)^(-1) as the Hawking temperature.
    Used throughout Section 3; standard in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Fisher Information in Curved Spacetime: Dirac Particles in Noisy Channels around a Schwarzschild Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NT5SGKQ7

@misc{pith2026250717901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Fisher Information in Curved Spacetime: Dirac Particles in Noisy Channels around a Schwarzschild Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NT5SGKQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17901}
}
abstract

Quantum information processing promises significant advantages over classical methods but remains vulnerable to decoherence induced by environmental interactions and spacetime effects. This work investigates the behavior of Quantum Fisher Information (QFI) as a diagnostic tool for entanglement and parameter estimation in a three-qubit entangled Dirac system subjected to dissipative noisy channels in the curved spacetime of a Schwarzschild black hole. In particular, we examine the influence of the squeezed generalized amplitude damping (SGAD) channel, along with its subchannels -- generalized amplitude damping (GAD) and amplitude damping (AD) -- on the QFI with respect to entanglement weight ($\theta$) and phase ($\phi$) parameters. Our results show that under strong squeezing ($r = 1$), the QFI with respect to $\theta$ becomes completely resistant to variations in the Hawking temperature ($T_H$), while still exhibiting degradation with increasing channel temperature ($T_C$). The QFI decay is significantly slower at $r = 1$ compared to $r = 0$, suggesting that squeezing can function as an error mitigation strategy. For QFI with respect to $\phi$, a transient spike is observed at $T_C = 2$, potentially due to thermal resonance or non-monotonic decoherence, and this behavior is unaffected by $T_H$. Similar patterns are noted in the GAD and AD channels, where $T_C$ consistently dominates as the principal source of decoherence. Overall, the results highlight the intricate interplay between environmental noise, relativistic effects, and quantum error resilience in curved spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17901 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The methodology for the research The evolution of this tripartite system is investigated utilizing quantum channels, namely the SGAD channel and its subchannels, GAD and AD. Each noise model is mathematically defined by a collection of Kraus operators, which are employed to compute the system’s density matrix during decoherence. The resulting density matrices’ eigenvalues and eigenvectors are then retrieved and inse… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of a three-qubit entangled system in which the third qubit is subjected to Hawking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In the scenario when r = 1 and θ = 0, the 3D graph shows variations in F θSGAD with modifications in the SGAD channel temperature TC and the Hawking temperature TH. and these portions are summed up to obtain: sF θSGAD = 4(1 − λ) 2Q2 e w/T (1 − λ) 2 sin2 (θ) (e w/T + 1) + cos2 (θ)e w/T + Q2  2(1 − λ) 2 sin(θ) cos(θ) − 2 sin(θ) cos(θ) e−w/T +1 2 (1 − λ) 2 sin2 (θ) + cos2 (θ) e −w/T + 1 + 4λ(1 − µ)(1 − Q)Q cos2 (θ) +… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a-g) 3D graph illustrating changes in F θSGAD associated with variations in the SGAD channel temperature TC, the Hawking temperature TH, and the angle θ, while the extent of squeezing r is fixed at 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Graphs illustrating changes in F θSGAD associated with variations in the SGAD channel temperature TC and the Hawking temperature TH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The relationship between the variable sF ϕSGAD and variations in both the temperature of the SGAD channel (TC) and the Hawking temperature (TH) in the presence of a Schwarzschild black hole. • At θ = 30◦ , the QFI remains mostly unaffected by TC but diminishes with inc…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Figure illustrating the relationship between the GAD channel temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The relationship between the GAD channel temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Graph showing the correlation between changes regarding the AD channel variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Graph illustrating the relationship between the value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Information field and its carriers in biological systems

    Volodymyr Krasnoholovets. Information field and its carriers in biological systems. NeuroQuan- tology, 20(4):179–201, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Key technologies and architectures for 6g and beyond wireless communication system

    Aman Kumar Mishra and Vijayakumar Ponnusamy. Key technologies and architectures for 6g and beyond wireless communication system. In AI and Blockchain Technology in 6G Wireless Network, pages 25–44. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Quan- tum identity authentication for non-entanglement multiparty communication: A review, state of art and future directions

    Nur Shahirah Binti Azahari, Nur Ziadah Binti Harun, and Zuriati Binti Ahmad Zukarnain. Quan- tum identity authentication for non-entanglement multiparty communication: A review, state of art and future directions. ICT Express, 9(4):534–547, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Scrutinizing joint remote state preparation under decoherence

    Cookey Iyen, Babatunde James Falaye, and Muhammad Sanusi Liman. Scrutinizing joint remote state preparation under decoherence. Scientific Reports, 13(1):8066, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 47(10):777, 1935

    Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review, 47(10):777, 1935

    work page 1935

  6. [6]

    No-cloning theorem, quantum teleportation and spooky correlations

    Bernard Zygelman. No-cloning theorem, quantum teleportation and spooky correlations. In A First Introduction to Quantum Computing and Information , pages 123–145. Springer, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A lightweight quantum blockchain-based framework to protect patients pri- vate medical information

    Ranjitha Venkatesh. A lightweight quantum blockchain-based framework to protect patients pri- vate medical information. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Enhancing eavesdropping detection in quantum key dis- tribution using disentropy measure of randomness

    GS Castro and Rubens Viana Ramos. Enhancing eavesdropping detection in quantum key dis- tribution using disentropy measure of randomness. Quantum Information Processing , 21(2):79, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Eavesdropping detection in bb84 quantum key distribution protocols

    Chankyun Lee, Ilkwon Sohn, and Wonhyuk Lee. Eavesdropping detection in bb84 quantum key distribution protocols. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , 19(3):2689–2701, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Scalable entanglement certification via quantum communication

    Pharnam Bakhshinezhad, Mohammad Mehboudi, Carles Roch I Carceller, and Armin Tavakoli. Scalable entanglement certification via quantum communication. PRX Quantum , 5(2):020319, 2024. 18

    2024

  3. [11]

    Quantum-dot- based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology

    Ravitej Uppu, Leonardo Midolo, Xiaoyan Zhou, Jacques Carolan, and Peter Lodahl. Quantum-dot- based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology. Nature nanotechnology, 16(12):1308–1317, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    From quantum communication fundamentals to decoherence mitigation strategies: Addressing global quantum network challenges and projected applications

    Muhammad Annas Khan, Salman Ghafoor, Syed Mohammad Hassan Zaidi, Haibat Khan, and Arsalan Ahmad. From quantum communication fundamentals to decoherence mitigation strategies: Addressing global quantum network challenges and projected applications. Heliyon, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Decoherence and quantum error correction for quantum computing and communications

    Josu Etxezarreta Martinez. Decoherence and quantum error correction for quantum computing and communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08600 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Quantum Dynamics: Quantum Metrology, Control, Open Systems and Entanglement Dy- namics

    Le Hu. Quantum Dynamics: Quantum Metrology, Control, Open Systems and Entanglement Dy- namics. University of Rochester, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Randomized measurements for multi-parameter quantum metrology

    Sisi Zhou and Senrui Chen. Randomized measurements for multi-parameter quantum metrology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03536 , 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Quantum interferometers: principles and applications

    Rui-Bo Jin, Zi-Qi Zeng, Chenglong You, and Chenzhi Yuan. Quantum interferometers: principles and applications. Progress in Quantum Electronics, page 100519, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    High-precision mapping of diamond crystal strain using quantum inter- ferometry

    Mason C Marshall, Reza Ebadi, Connor Hart, Matthew J Turner, Mark JH Ku, David F Phillips, and Ronald L Walsworth. High-precision mapping of diamond crystal strain using quantum inter- ferometry. Physical Review Applied, 17(2):024041, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Spin-squeezed states for metrology

    Alice Sinatra. Spin-squeezed states for metrology. Applied Physics Letters , 120(12), 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Multi-parameter quantum metrology with stabilized multi-mode squeezed state

    Yue Li, Xu Cheng, Lingna Wang, Xingyu Zhao, Waner Hou, Yi Li, Kamran Rehan, Mingdong Zhu, Lin Yan, Xi Qin, et al. Multi-parameter quantum metrology with stabilized multi-mode squeezed state. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10379 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology: from standard quantum limit to heisenberg limit

    Jiahao Huang, Min Zhuang, and Chaohong Lee. Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology: from standard quantum limit to heisenberg limit. Applied Physics Reviews , 11(3), 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology in colored noise by quantum zeno effect

    Xinyue Long, Wan-Ting He, Na-Na Zhang, Kai Tang, Zidong Lin, Hongfeng Liu, Xinfang Nie, Guanru Feng, Jun Li, Tao Xin, et al. Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology in colored noise by quantum zeno effect. Physical Review Letters, 129(7):070502, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Quantum-enhanced metrology with large fock states

    Xiaowei Deng, Sai Li, Zi-Jie Chen, Zhongchu Ni, Yanyan Cai, Jiasheng Mai, Libo Zhang, Pan Zheng, Haifeng Yu, Chang-Ling Zou, et al. Quantum-enhanced metrology with large fock states. Nature Physics, pages 1–7, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Quantum metrology for non-markovian processes

    Anian Altherr and Yuxiang Yang. Quantum metrology for non-markovian processes. Physical Review Letters, 127(6):060501, 2021. 19

    2021

  16. [24]

    Quantum fisher information from randomized measurements

    Aniket Rath, Cyril Branciard, Anna Minguzzi, and Beno ˆ ıt Vermersch. Quantum fisher information from randomized measurements. Physical Review Letters, 127(26):260501, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Quantum metrology of noisy spreading channels

    Wojciech G´ orecki, Alberto Riccardi, and Lorenzo Maccone. Quantum metrology of noisy spreading channels. Physical Review Letters, 129(24):240503, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Investigating impact of bit-flip errors in control electronics on quantum computation

    Subrata Das, Avimita Chatterjee, and Swaroop Ghosh. Investigating impact of bit-flip errors in control electronics on quantum computation. In 2025 38th International Conference on VLSI Design and 2024 23rd International Conference on Embedded Systems (VLSID) , pages 558–563. I...

    2025

  19. [27]

    Protecting quantum fisher information in correlated quantum channels

    Ming-Liang Hu and Hui-Fang Wang. Protecting quantum fisher information in correlated quantum channels. Annalen der Physik , 532(1):1900378, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Information-theoretic aspects of the general- ized amplitude-damping channel

    Sumeet Khatri, Kunal Sharma, and Mark M Wilde. Information-theoretic aspects of the general- ized amplitude-damping channel. Physical Review A , 102(1):012401, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Entanglement-assisted covert communication via qubit depolarizing channels

    Elyakim Zlotnick, Boulat Bash, and Uzi Pereg. Entanglement-assisted covert communication via qubit depolarizing channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Fi- delity of quantum states in a correlated dephasing channel

    Atta Ur Rahman, Saeed Haddadi, Mohammad Reza Pourkarimi, and Mehrdad Ghominejad. Fi- delity of quantum states in a correlated dephasing channel. Laser Physics Letters , 19(3):035204, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Quantum capacity analysis of multi-level amplitude damping channels

    Stefano Chessa and Vittorio Giovannetti. Quantum capacity analysis of multi-level amplitude damping channels. Communications Physics, 4(1):22, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Examining the quan- tum fisher information in the interaction of a dirac system with a squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel

    C Iyen, MS Liman, SJ Emem-Obong, W A Yahya, CA Onate, and BJ Falaye. Examining the quan- tum fisher information in the interaction of a dirac system with a squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel. Scientific Reports, 14(1):24495, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Mass fluctuations in non-rotating btz black holes

    Hyewon Han and Bogeun Gwak. Mass fluctuations in non-rotating btz black holes. Physics Letters B, 857:138980, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    General relativity

    Gabor Kunstatter and Saurya Das. General relativity. In A First Course on Symmetry, Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: The Foundations of Physics , pages 139–162. Springer, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Trapped surface formation for the einstein- scalar system

    Peng Zhao, David Hilditch, and Juan A Valiente Kroon. Trapped surface formation for the einstein- scalar system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01695 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Genuinely accessible and inaccessible entanglement in schwarzschild black hole.Physics Letters B, 848:138334, 2024

    Shu-Min Wu, Xiao-Wei Teng, Jin-Xuan Li, Si-Han Li, Tong-Hua Liu, and Jie-Ci Wang. Genuinely accessible and inaccessible entanglement in schwarzschild black hole.Physics Letters B, 848:138334, 2024. 20

    2024

  29. [37]

    An effective model for the quantum schwarzschild black hole

    Asier Alonso-Bardaji, David Brizuela, and Ra¨ ul Vera. An effective model for the quantum schwarzschild black hole. Physics Letters B , 829:137075, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Extremal kerr black holes as amplifiers of new physics

    Gary T Horowitz, Maciej Kolanowski, Grant N Remmen, and Jorge E Santos. Extremal kerr black holes as amplifiers of new physics. Physical Review Letters, 131(9):091402, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Kerr black holes from massive higher-spin gauge symmetry

    Lucile Cangemi, Marco Chiodaroli, Henrik Johansson, Alexander Ochirov, Paolo Pichini, and Evgeny Skvortsov. Kerr black holes from massive higher-spin gauge symmetry. Physical Review Letters, 131(22):221401, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Exact analytical quasibound states of a scalar particle around a reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole

    David Senjaya. Exact analytical quasibound states of a scalar particle around a reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole. Physics Letters B , 848:138373, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Charged particle motion around a magnetized reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole

    Sanjar Shaymatov, Bakhtiyor Narzilloev, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Cosimo Bambi. Charged particle motion around a magnetized reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole. Physical Review D , 103(12):124066, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Hawking radiation particle spectrum of a kerr-newman black hole

    Joshua Foo and Michael RR Good. Hawking radiation particle spectrum of a kerr-newman black hole. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2021(01):019, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Entanglement islands from holographic thermalization of rotating charged black hole

    Po-Chun Sun. Entanglement islands from holographic thermalization of rotating charged black hole. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12557 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Protected quantum teleportation through noisy channel by weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement

    Sajede Harraz, Shuang Cong, and Juan J Nieto. Protected quantum teleportation through noisy channel by weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement. IEEE Communications Letters, 26(3):528–531, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Quantum teleportation in a two- superconducting qubit system under dephasing noisy channel: role of josephson and mutual cou- pling energies

    Nour Zidan, Atta ur Rahman, and Saeed Haddadi. Quantum teleportation in a two- superconducting qubit system under dephasing noisy channel: role of josephson and mutual cou- pling energies. Laser Physics Letters , 20(2):025204, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Security of bennett–brassard 1984 quantum-key distribution under a collective-rotation noise channel

    Mhlambululi Mafu, Comfort Sekga, and Makhamisa Senekane. Security of bennett–brassard 1984 quantum-key distribution under a collective-rotation noise channel. In Photonics, volume 9, page

    1984

  39. [47]

    Quantum key distribution over noisy channels by the testing state method

    Hao Shu, Chang-Yue Zhang, Yue-Qiu Chen, Zhu-Jun Zheng, and Shao-Ming Fei. Quantum key distribution over noisy channels by the testing state method. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 62(8):160, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Investigating quantum metrology in noisy channels.Scientific Reports, 7(1):16622, 2017

    BJ Falaye, AG Adepoju, AS Aliyu, MM Melchor, MS Liman, OJ Oluwadare, MD Gonz´ alez- Ram ´ ırez, and KJ Oyewumi. Investigating quantum metrology in noisy channels.Scientific Reports, 7(1):16622, 2017. 21

    2017

  41. [49]

    Joint remote state preparation (jrsp) of two-qubit equatorial state in quantum noisy channels

    Adenike Grace Adepoju, Babatunde James Falaye, Guo-Hua Sun, Oscar Camacho-Nieto, and Shi- Hai Dong. Joint remote state preparation (jrsp) of two-qubit equatorial state in quantum noisy channels. Physics Letters A , 381(6):581–587, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Quantum limits of superresolution in a noisy environment

    Changhun Oh, Sisi Zhou, Yat Wong, and Liang Jiang. Quantum limits of superresolution in a noisy environment. Physical Review Letters, 126(12):120502, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Control-enhanced quantum metrology under markovian noise

    Yue Zhai, Xiaodong Yang, Kai Tang, Xinyue Long, Xinfang Nie, Tao Xin, Dawei Lu, and Jun Li. Control-enhanced quantum metrology under markovian noise. Physical Review A , 107(2):022602, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Generalized phase estimation in noisy quantum gates

    Giovanni Ragazzi, Simone Cavazzoni, Paolo Bordone, and Matteo GA Paris. Generalized phase estimation in noisy quantum gates. Physical Review A , 110(5):052425, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Probing quantum fisher information of an open dirac system with hawking effect in the schwarzschild black hole

    Babatunde James Falaye and Muhammad Sanusi Liman. Probing quantum fisher information of an open dirac system with hawking effect in the schwarzschild black hole. Laser Physics , 30(11):115206, 2020

    2020

  46. [54]

    Black-hole evaporation in the klein-sauter-heisenberg-euler formalism

    Thibaut Damour and Remo Ruffini. Black-hole evaporation in the klein-sauter-heisenberg-euler formalism. Physical Review D , 14(2):332, 1976

    1976

  47. [55]

    Surface code with decoherence: An analysis of three superconducting architectures

    Joydip Ghosh, Austin G Fowler, and Michael R Geller. Surface code with decoherence: An analysis of three superconducting architectures. Physical Review A , 86(6):062318, 2012

    2012

  48. [56]

    M Nielsen. 1. chuang, quantum computation and quantum information. cambridge, uk, 2000

    2000

  49. [57]

    Squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel

    R Srikanth and Subhashish Banerjee. Squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel. Physical Review A, 77(1):012318, 2008

    2008

  50. [58]

    Protecting quantum fisher information in curved space-time

    Zhiming Huang. Protecting quantum fisher information in curved space-time. The European Physical Journal Plus , 133:1–8, 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    Quantum fisher information in the cosmic string spacetime

    Zhiming Huang, Haozhen Situ, and Zhimin He. Quantum fisher information in the cosmic string spacetime. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 37(17):175002, 2020. 22

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.