Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Monte Carlo studies of the emergent spacetime in the polarized IKKT model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monte Carlo simulations of the N=2 polarized IKKT matrix model show that the saddle point of the original IKKT model is smoothly connected to the fuzzy-sphere saddle at large deformation parameter Omega, while at small Omega the dominant…

desk verdict A clean N=2 Monte Carlo study with a strong check against localization; the saddle-classification claim is convincing but rests on an unproven symmetric ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18472 v1 pith:PVKZKVE4 submitted 2025-07-24 hep-th gr-qchep-lathep-ph

Chien-Yu Chou , Jun Nishimura , Cheng-Tsung Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-lathep-ph PACS 11.25.-w02.70.Uu
keywords IKKTmatrixmodelpolarizedfuzzyspherecommutingmatricesMonteCarlosimulationparalleltemperingSUSYlocalizationemergentspacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the polarized IKKT matrix model, a supersymmetry-preserving mass deformation of the type IIB (IKKT) matrix model, at matrix size $N=2$ over a wide range of the deformation parameter $\Omega$. Using Monte Carlo simulations with parallel tempering, it reproduces the partition function obtained by supersymmetric localization and then computes observables that localization cannot reach. The central finding is that the saddle point representing the undeformed IKKT model is smoothly connected, as $\Omega$ grows, to the fuzzy-sphere saddle that dominates at large $\Omega$; as $\Omega$ shrinks, the dominant configurations are instead commuting matrices whose entries diverge as $1/\Omega$. This explains why the partition function diverges as $\Omega^{-2}$ and why the $\Omega \to 0$ limit does not return the finite original IKKT model. The histogram data show a double-peak crossover around $\Omega \sim 4$, where the two types of configuration exchange dominance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective action $S_{\mathrm{eff}}(A)=S_b(A)-\log\operatorname{Pf}(M(A))$ obtained after integrating out the sixteen fermionic matrices, together with its saddle-point equation $dS_{\mathrm{eff}}/dA=0$. For $N=2$ the Pfaffian is real and positive semidefinite, so the dominant saddles are real and the sign problem is absent. The argument then rests on two symmetry-reduced ansatze: the fuzzy-sphere ansatz $A_a=x\,\sigma_a/2$ with $x_1=x_2=x_3=x$ and $\sigma_a$ the fundamental $2\times2$ su(2) generators, which carries the smooth connection from the $\Omega=0$ saddle to the large-$\Omega$ fuzzy sphere, the matrix analogue of an ordinary two-sphere; and the commuting ansatz $A_3=x\,\sigma_3/2$, $A_{10}=y\,\sigma_3/2$, which captures the $O(1/\Omega)$ diverging configurations responsible for the singularity. Parallel tempering across the two widely separated saddle families is what lets the Monte Carlo simulation sample both peaks with the correct weights.

What would settle it

Evaluate the full $N=2$ saddle-point equation (8) numerically without imposing $x_1=x_2=x_3$ and without setting $A_I=0$, on a grid of $\Omega$ in $[0.3,12]$. If any stationary configuration appears whose effective action is comparable to or lower than the two identified families, the claim that all contributing saddle points were captured fails. A direct Monte Carlo check is to start from an asymmetric initial condition near $\Omega=1$ and see whether a third peak emerges in the $\log\rho_3$ or $\log\rho_7$ histogram.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

After integrating out the fermions, the model is controlled by the effective action $S_{\mathrm{eff}}(A)=S_b(A)-\log\operatorname{Pf}(M(A))$, whose saddle-point equation $dS_{\mathrm{eff}}/dA=0$ has real solutions for $N=2$ because the Pfaffian is real and positive semidefinite. For the fuzzy-sphere family the paper uses the ansatz $A_a=x\,\sigma_a/2$ with $x_1=x_2=x_3=x$; the saddle value $x$ behaves as $x=2^{3/4}+\tfrac{3}{32}\Omega+O(\Omega^2)$ for $\Omega\ll 1$ and $x=\tfrac{3}{8}\Omega+O(\Omega^{-2})$ for $\Omega\gg 1$, showing that the unique $\Omega=0$ saddle of the original model is on the same branch as the large-$\Omega$ fuzzy sphere. The commuting-matrix family, parametrized by $A_3=x\,\sigma_3/2$ and $A_{10}=y\,\sigma_3/2$, has saddles at $x=\frac{1}{4\Omega}\sqrt{2^{14}/3+\Omega^4},\,y=0$ and at $x=0,\,y=\frac{1}{4\Omega}\sqrt{2^{14}-\Omega^4}$, both of order $1/\Omega$, and these dominate as $\Omega\to 0$. The measured derivative $d\log Z(\Omega)/d\Omega$ agrees with supersymmetric localization across $0.3\le\Omega\le 12$ and goes as $-2/\Omega$ as $\Omega\to0$, so $Z(\Omega)\sim\Omega^{-2}$; the spacetime extents $\rho_3=\operatorname{tr}(A_a)^2$ and $\rho_7=\operatorname{tr}(A_I)^2$ follow the one-loop effective theory at small $\Omega$ and show the two families exchanging dominance near $\Omega\sim4$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the symmetric ansatz $x_1=x_2=x_3=x$ catches the entire fuzzy-sphere saddle family and that the commuting family is the only other contributor; if another saddle family with unequal $x_a$ or nonzero $A_I$ contributes in $0.3\le\Omega\le12$, the smooth-connection and completeness claims would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $\Omega\to0$ limit of the polarized IKKT model does not converge to the original IKKT model: the partition function diverges as $\Omega^{-2}$ and the dominant configurations are commuting matrices with entries of order $1/\Omega$.
  • The $\Omega=0$ saddle of the original model and the fuzzy-sphere saddle at large $\Omega$ lie on one smooth branch in the $N=2$ case, at least within the symmetric ansatz.
  • The change of dominance near $\Omega\sim4$ is a smooth crossover for $N=2$, with continuous observables and two coexisting peaks in the $\rho_3$ and $\rho_7$ distributions, not a sharp phase transition.
  • The same divergence mechanism appears in a one-variable polynomial integral, so the failure to recover the original model in the $\Omega\to0$ limit does not require supersymmetry or fermions.
  • The unpolarized extent $\rho_7$ acts as a probe that distinguishes the two spacetime structures: it vanishes on the fuzzy-sphere branch and grows on the commuting branch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-branch structure persists at larger $N$, the polarized deformation cannot be used as a regulator that returns the original IKKT model as $\Omega\to0$; the commuting branch would continue to dominate no matter how smoothly the fuzzy-sphere branch connects to the undeformed saddle.
  • The symmetric ansatz leaves open the possibility of additional asymmetric fuzzy-sphere-type saddles; locating all stationary points of the full effective action would confirm whether the connection found here is the only one.
  • The one-variable analogue suggests that adding a supersymmetry-preserving mass term to the Lorentzian IKKT model could likewise generate a new dominant vacuum at infinitesimal mass, with consequences for the string-landscape interpretation.
  • The double-peak crossover observed at $N=2$ should sharpen as $N$ grows, since the free-energy difference between branches scales as $N^2$; a sharper transition at larger $N$ would be a testable signature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports Monte Carlo simulations of the N=2 polarized IKKT matrix model for deformation parameter Omega in the range 0.3 <= Omega <= 12, using a parallel tempering HMC algorithm. The derivative of the log partition function is computed as an expectation value and is found to agree with the SUSY localization result over the whole range, and the small-Omega and large-Omega limits are compared with one-loop and fuzzy-sphere saddle predictions. The authors also measure the extents rho3 and rho7 in the polarized and unpolarized directions, observing a crossover from diverging commuting-matrix configurations at small Omega to a fuzzy-sphere configuration at large Omega. The central claim is that the Omega=0 saddle of the original IKKT model is smoothly connected to the large-Omega fuzzy sphere, while the diverging commuting matrices are responsible for the Omega->0 divergence of the partition function. A toy integral is used to argue that the phenomenon is generic.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper clarifies the geometric origin of the recently found Omega->0 singularity and the nature of the intermediate transition in the simplest N=2 case of the polarized IKKT model, and it demonstrates that Monte Carlo simulations can access observables beyond the localization formula. The paper's strengths include the parameter-free validation of the simulation against the localization partition function over a wide Omega range, and the matching of the small-Omega and large-Omega asymptotics to independently derived one-loop and saddle-point expressions. The main caveat is that the smooth-connection statement is derived within a symmetry-restricted ansatz rather than from a complete saddle-point analysis, and no statistical uncertainties are reported for the Monte Carlo data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fuzzy sphere saddle, Eqs. (9), (12), (13), and the Discussions paragraph] The central claim that the Omega=0 saddle is smoothly connected to the large-Omega fuzzy sphere rests on the ansatz x1=x2=x3 in Eq. (9). At Omega != 0 the model has only SO(3) x SO(7) x SU(2) symmetry, so this ansatz is not forced by symmetry, and the full saddle-point equations (8) for the three coefficients xa are not solved. Unless one proves, or verifies numerically, that no other fuzzy-sphere-type branch exists or contributes for 0.3 <= Omega <= 12, the statements that the Omega=0 saddle is 'smoothly connected' to the large-Omega fuzzy sphere and that 'all the saddle points that contribute' were identified are not established. I request a full solution of the three-variable saddle-point equations, or a numerical scan over x1, x2, x3, to rule out additional branches.
  2. [Monte Carlo result, Figs. 1 and 2] No statistical uncertainties are reported for any of the Monte Carlo quantities. The claimed 'complete agreement' with the localization result and the one-loop/saddle predictions cannot be assessed quantitatively without error bars. Please include error bars or a table of statistical errors for all plotted quantities, together with the number of samples and relevant autocorrelation times.
  3. [Monte Carlo result, Fig. 3] The identification of the left peak in the histograms with the fuzzy-sphere branch that connects to the Omega=0 solution is made by inspection. A quantitative comparison of the peak positions as functions of Omega with the saddle prediction (13) would provide direct evidence for the smooth-connection claim. Without such a comparison, the histograms only show that two metastable families coexist, not that the left peak is on the same analytic branch as the Omega=0 saddle.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (15)] The notation 'Omega^8/216 E' is ambiguous; the intended expression appears to be Omega^8 / 2^16 times E. Please clarify the typesetting.
  2. [Eq. (12)] The coefficient '9 Omega^2 / 27' in the effective action should be simplified to Omega^2 / 3 for readability, and the same simplification should be applied consistently in Eq. (15).
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The text defines the observables as rho3 and rho7 in Eq. (17), but the figure caption refers to R3 and R7. Please unify the notation.
  4. [Text below Eq. (4)] The sentence 'The situation simplifies for Omega != 0 since the O(Omega) fermionic mass term in (2) induces the quadratic terms of the fermionic diagonal components' would be clearer if it explained that this renders the fermionic integration Gaussian.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: saddle branches are computed from the action and checked against independent localization and one-loop results.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular by the stated criteria. The saddle analysis starts from the exact bosonic integral (6) with the Pfaffian, and no free parameter is fitted: the fuzzy-sphere branch is obtained from the one-dimensional effective action (12) after the explicitly labeled ansatz x1=x2=x3=x, and its asymptotic (13) connects the Omega=0 saddle (11) to the classical fuzzy sphere (3) as a consistency check, not as an input. The commuting branch follows from the symmetry-reduced ansatz (14) and its O(1/Omega) saddles independently agree with the one-loop effective theory (5). The Monte Carlo data are validated by precise agreement with the SUSY localization partition function [38], which is an external benchmark, and the observables rho3 and rho7 are not defined in terms of any fitted constant. The only deferred item is the closed-form solution of (12), which the text sends to the in-preparation companion [48] ('The saddle-point equation admits a closed-form solution, which shall be given elsewhere [48]'); this is a completeness/verifiability limitation, not a circular step, because the asymptotic is stated and used directly and the simulation results stand independently. Similarly, the claim 'we were able to identify all the saddle points that contribute' is stronger than what the two symmetry-restricted ansatze prove, but under-justified generality is a correctness risk, not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-load-bearing reduction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters or invented entities were found. The calculations rely on the N=2 sign-problem-free property, a symmetric saddle ansatz whose completeness is not proved, the small-Omega one-loop effective theory, and the external localization benchmark. These are reasonable for the paper's scope but are assumptions the reader must accept.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption For N=2, the Pfaffian Pf(M(A)) is real and positive semi-definite, making the effective action real and the Monte Carlo simulation free of a sign problem.
    Stated in the section 'Saddle-point equation'; this property is what allows the numerical approach and is special to N=2.
  • ad hoc to paper The symmetric ansatz x1 = x2 = x3 = x in Eq. (9) captures the fuzzy-sphere saddle family that connects to the Omega=0 solution.
    Introduced after Eq. (11) 'in view of (11)' without a proof of completeness; the smooth-connection claim depends on it.
  • domain assumption At small Omega, the one-loop effective theory (5), obtained by integrating out off-diagonal and fermionic diagonal modes around commuting matrices, describes the dominant configurations.
    Used to predict the Omega-to-zero divergence and the growth of rho3 and rho7; the paper asserts this description is 'better' in that regime.
  • domain assumption The SUSY localization result of Ref. [38] is an exact external benchmark for the partition function.
    Used as the reference curve in Fig. 1; the paper does not rederive it but relies on it for validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monte Carlo studies of the emergent spacetime in the polarized IKKT model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVKZKVE4

@misc{pith2026250718472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monte Carlo studies of the emergent spacetime in the polarized IKKT model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVKZKVE4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18472}
}
read the original abstract

The IKKT matrix model has been investigated as a promising nonperturbative formulation of superstring theory. One of the recent developments concerning this model is the discovery of the dual supergravity solution corresponding to the model obtained after supersymmetry-preserving mass deformation, which is dubbed the polarized IKKT model. Here we perform Monte Carlo simulations of this model in the case of matrix size N = 2 for a wide range of the deformation parameter Omega. While we reproduce precisely the known result for the partition function obtained by the localization method developed for supersymmetric theories, we also calculate the observables, which were not accessible by previous work, in order to probe the spacetime structure emergent from the dominant matrix configurations. In particular, we find that the saddle point corresponding to the original IKKT model is smoothly connected to the saddle represented by the fuzzy sphere dominant at large Omega, whereas the dominant configurations become diverging commuting matrices at small Omega.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18472 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The derivative of the partition function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Histogram of the quantities log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ishibashi, H

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 498, 467 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612115

    arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, A. Tsuchiya, and T. Tada, IIB matrix model, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 134, 47 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908038

    arXiv 1999

  3. [3]

    Eguchi and H

    T. Eguchi and H. Kawai, Reduction of Dynamical De- grees of Freedom in the Large N Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1063 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Parisi, A Simple Expression for Planar Field Theories, Phys

    G. Parisi, A Simple Expression for Planar Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B 112, 463 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    D. J. Gross and Y. Kitazawa, A Quenched Momentum Prescription for Large N Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 206, 440 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    Gonzalez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, The Twisted Eguchi- Kawai Model: A Reduced Model for Large N Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2397 (1983)

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Witten, Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl

    E. Witten, Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 460, 335 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9510135

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, Effects of D instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 498, 195 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9701093

    arXiv 1997

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and T. Tada, Space-time structures from IIB matrix model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 713 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802085

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hotta, J

    T. Hotta, J. Nishimura, and A. Tsuchiya, Dynamical as- pects of large N reduced models, Nucl. Phys. B 545, 543 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9811220

    1999 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura, and A. Tsuchiya, Expand- ing (3+1)-dimensional universe from a Lorentzian matrix model for superstring theory in (9+1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011601 (2012), arXiv:1108.1540 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura, and A. Tsuchiya, Expanding universe as a classical solution in the Lorentzian matrix model for nonperturbative superstring theory, Phys. Rev. D 86, 027901 (2012), arXiv:1110.4803 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura, and A. Tsuchiya, Late time behaviors of the expanding universe in the IIB matrix model, JHEP 10, 147, arXiv:1208.0711 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    H. C. Steinacker, Cosmological space-times with resolved Big Bang in Yang-Mills matrix models, JHEP 02, 033, arXiv:1709.10480 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    H. C. Steinacker, Quantized open FRW cosmology from Yang–Mills matrix models, Phys. Lett. B 782, 176 (2018), arXiv:1710.11495 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sperling and H

    M. Sperling and H. C. Steinacker, Covariant cosmologi- cal quantum space-time, higher-spin and gravity in the IKKT matrix model, JHEP 07, 010, arXiv:1901.03522 [hep-th]

    1901 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Hatakeyama, A

    K. Hatakeyama, A. Matsumoto, J. Nishimura, A. Tsuchiya, and A. Yosprakob, The emergence of 6 expanding space–time and intersecting D-branes from classical solutions in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, PTEP 2020, 043B10 (2020), arXiv:1911.08132 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    H. C. Steinacker, Gravity as a quantum effect on quan- tum space-time, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136946 (2022), arXiv:2110.03936 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Brahma, R

    S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger, and S. Laliberte, BFSS Matrix Model Cosmology: Progress and Challenges, (2022), arXiv:2210.07288 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    F. R. Klinkhamer, Emergent gravity from the IIB matrix model and cancellation of a cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 124001 (2023), arXiv:2212.00709 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hirasawa, K

    M. Hirasawa, K. N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, K. Hatakeyama, J. Nishimura, S. Papadoudis, and A. Tsuchiya, The effects of SUSY on the emergent space- time in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, PoS CORFU2023, 257 (2024), arXiv:2407.03491 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and grav- ity, Phys. Rept. 323, 183 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9905111

    2000 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9610043

    1997 arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. W. Gibbons, M. B. Green, and M. J. Perry, Instantons and seven-branes in type IIB superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 370, 37 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9511080

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ooguri and K

    H. Ooguri and K. Skenderis, On the field theory limit of D instantons, JHEP 11, 013, arXiv:hep-th/9810128

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ciceri and H

    F. Ciceri and H. Samtleben, Holography for the IKKT matrix model, (2025), arXiv:2503.08771 [hep-th]

    2025

  20. [28]

    S. A. Hartnoll and J. Liu, The polarised IKKT matrix model, JHEP 03, 060, arXiv:2409.18706 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Komatsu, A

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part I, arXiv preprint (2024), arXiv:2410.18173 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bonelli, Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed superYang-Mills theory, JHEP 08, 022, arXiv:hep-th/0205213

    G. Bonelli, Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed superYang-Mills theory, JHEP 08, 022, arXiv:hep-th/0205213

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    H. Lin, O. Lunin, and J. M. Maldacena, Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries, JHEP10, 025, arXiv:hep- th/0409174

  24. [32]

    Lin and J

    H. Lin and J. M. Maldacena, Fivebranes from gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084014 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0509235

    2006

  25. [33]

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena, and H. S. Nastase, Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 Super Yang Mills, AIP Conf. Proc. 646, 3 (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    Azuma, S

    T. Azuma, S. Bal, K. Nagao, and J. Nishimura, Non- perturbative studies of fuzzy spheres in a matrix model with the Chern-Simons term, JHEP 05, 005, arXiv:hep- th/0401038

  27. [35]

    Azuma, K

    T. Azuma, K. Nagao, and J. Nishimura, Perturbative dynamics of fuzzy spheres at large N, JHEP 06, 081, arXiv:hep-th/0410263

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    R. C. Myers, Dielectric branes, JHEP 12, 022, arXiv:hep- th/9910053

  29. [37]

    T. J. Hollowood and S. P. Kumar, World sheet instantons via the Myers effect and N=1* quiver superpotentials, JHEP 10, 077, arXiv:hep-th/0206051

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Komatsu, A

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, Einstein gravity from a matrix integral – Part II, arXiv preprint (2024), arXiv:2411.18678 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four- sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun

    V. Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four- sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys. 313, 71 (2012), arXiv:0712.2824 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Asano, G

    Y. Asano, G. Ishiki, T. Okada, and S. Shimasaki, Emer- gent bubbling geometries in the plane wave matrix model, JHEP 05, 075, arXiv:1401.5079 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov, and S. Shatashvili, D par- ticle bound states and generalized instantons, Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 77 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9803265

    2000 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Krauth, H

    W. Krauth, H. Nicolai, and M. Staudacher, Monte Carlo approach to M theory, Phys. Lett. B 431, 31 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9803117

    1998 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Austing and J

    P. Austing and J. F. Wheater, Convergent Yang-Mills matrix theories, JHEP 04, 019, arXiv:hep-th/0103159

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    V. A. Kazakov, I. K. Kostov, and N. A. Nekrasov, D particles, matrix integrals and KP hierarchy, Nucl. Phys. B 557, 413 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9810035

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    S. A. Hartnoll and J. Liu, Statistical Physics of the Polarised IKKT Matrix Model, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2504.06481 [hep-th]

    2025

  38. [46]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Joseph, and P. Kumar, Complex Langevin study of spontaneous symmetry breaking in IKKT matrix model, PoS LA TTICE2022, 213 (2023), arXiv:2209.10494 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Joseph, and P. Kumar, Investigating spontaneous SO(10) symmetry breaking in type IIB matrix model, Springer Proc. Phys. 304, 1201 (2024), arXiv:2308.03607 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Chau, C.-Y

    T.-L. Chau, C.-Y. Chou, J. Nishimura, and C.-T. Wang, in preparation

  41. [49]

    Nishimura, T

    J. Nishimura, T. Okubo, and F. Sugino, Systematic study of the SO(10) symmetry breaking vacua in the matrix model for type IIB superstrings, JHEP 10, 135, arXiv:1108.1293 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    K. N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, T. Okubo, and S. Kovalkov Papadoudis, Complex Langevin analysis of the spontaneous breaking of 10D ro- tational symmetry in the Euclidean IKKT matrix model, JHEP 06, 069, arXiv:2002.07410 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    K. N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, K. Hatakeyama, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, S. K. Papadoudis, and A. Tsuchiya, Progress in the numerical studies of the type IIB matrix model, Eur. Phys. J. ST 232, 3681 (2023), arXiv:2210.17537 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Asano, J

    Y. Asano, J. Nishimura, W. Piensuk, and N. Yamamori, Defining the Type IIB Matrix Model without Breaking Lorentz Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 041603 (2025), arXiv:2404.14045 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    C.-Y. Chou, J. Nishimura, and A. Tripathi, Inequiva- lence between the Euclidean and Lorentzian Versions of the Type IIB Matrix Model from Lefschetz Thim- ble Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 211601 (2025), arXiv:2501.17798 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.