Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Kalb-Ramond Black Holes Sourced by ModMax Electrodynamics: Some Perturbative Properties in the Phantom Sector

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A phantom Kalb-Ramond black hole's ringdown is tuned by the Lorentz-violation parameter $\ell$ and the ModMax parameter $\gamma$.

desk verdict A serious exact-solution paper whose central QNM claim is contradicted by its own time-domain results; needs major revision before it earns publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19088 v2 pith:RV3O35NU submitted 2025-07-25 gr-qc

Y. Sekhmani , A. Baruah , S. K. Maurya , J. Rayimbaev , M. Altanji , I. Ibragimov , S. Muminov This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C47
keywords Kalb-RamondblackholesModMaxelectrodynamicsphantomsectorLorentzsymmetryviolationquasinormalmodesgreybodyfactorsHawkingradiationsparsityWKBmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs exact electrically charged black-hole solutions in a theory where nonlinear ModMax electrodynamics is nonminimally coupled to a background Kalb-Ramond two-form field whose vacuum expectation value breaks local Lorentz symmetry. A discrete sign parameter $\zeta=\pm 1$ lets the same metric describe an ordinary branch and a phantom (ghost) branch in which the gauge-kinetic terms flip sign. The paper's main claim is that in the phantom sector, increasing either the Lorentz-violation parameter $\ell$ or the ModMax parameter $\gamma$ raises the real parts of scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational quasinormal frequencies and makes the imaginary parts more negative, so black holes ring faster and damp harder. It also claims the same parameters control greybody transmission and the sparsity of Hawking radiation, with $\eta$ falling as $\ell$ grows and asymptotically approaching a Schwarzschild-like value scaled by $(\ell-1)^2$. If correct, the model gives a concrete two-parameter handle on ringdown and evaporation signals that could be tested against gravitational-wave and semiclassical-emission observations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exact metric function with three parameters: $\ell$ (the vacuum expectation value of the Kalb-Ramond two-form, controlling Lorentz violation), $\gamma$ (the ModMax nonlinearity), and $\zeta$ (the branch sign that selects ordinary or phantom sector). On that background, the analysis is carried by three effective Schrödinger-type potentials: $V_s$ for scalar perturbations, the centrifugal $V_e=|g_{tt}|l(l+1)/r^2$ for electromagnetic perturbations, and the Regge-Wheeler-type $V_g$ for axial gravitational perturbations. Quasinormal frequencies are computed by Pade-averaged WKB in the frequency domain and by Gundlach-Price-Pullin integration plus Prony extraction in the time domain. The emission sector uses the Visser-Boonserm bound on greybody factors and the sparsity parameter $\eta$ that measures how far Hawking emission is from continuous thermal radiation.

What would settle it

Derive the axial gravitational perturbation equations directly from the full action with the $\xi_2$ and $\xi_3$ nonminimal couplings and the background Kalb-Ramond field, then compute the $l=2$, $n=0$ quasinormal frequency; if it differs from the Regge-Wheeler result $V_g(r)$ by more than the quoted WKB error, the spectrum reported here is not the spectrum of the action.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

With a vanishing cosmological constant and the Kalb-Ramond potential at its minimum, the authors derive the exact metric function $B(r)=1/(1-\ell)-2M/r+\zeta\,e^{-\gamma}Q^2/((1-\ell)^2 r^2)$ and electric potential $\Phi(r)=e^{-\gamma} Q/((1-\ell)r)$, valid when the interaction coupling satisfies $\eta=\ell/2b^2$. The spacetime interpolates between Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström, and ModMax black holes, and its curvature scalars carry $\ell$, $\gamma$, and $\zeta$ corrections while remaining singular at $r=0$. For perturbations, the paper claims that in the phantom sector ($\zeta=-1$) the quasinormal spectrum is strongly $\ell$-dependent: for $l=4$ gravitational modes the fundamental frequency shifts from about $0.810-0.094i$ at $\ell=0$ to about $3.98-1.14i$ at $\ell=0.8$, with analogous but weaker monotonic growth in $\gamma$. Time-domain evolution by the Gundlach-Price-Pullin method with Prony extraction agrees with the Pade-averaged WKB values to a few percent in the real part and about $0.02$ in the imaginary part, and reveals an anomalously long-lived quasi-resonance near $\ell\approx0.4$ in the phantom branch. The greybody bound falls with increasing $\ell$ in the phantom branch, and the Hawking sparsity parameter is $\eta = \frac{64\pi^3}{27}\frac{e^{2\gamma}(\ell-1)^4 r^4}{(e^\gamma(\ell-1)r^2+\zeta Q^2)^2}$, which decreases with $\ell$ and approaches the Schwarzschild sparsity scaled by $(\ell-1)^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole quasinormal-mode analysis assumes that gravitational perturbations obey the same Regge-Wheeler wave equation as in ordinary relativity, even though the theory has extra nonminimal couplings between the Kalb-Ramond field and curvature; if those couplings add new terms to the perturbation equations, the quoted frequencies and damping rates would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the phantom sector, the quasinormal-mode frequencies and damping rates are monotone in $\ell$: larger Lorentz violation means higher-pitched, shorter-lived ringdown across scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational channels.
  • The ModMax parameter $\gamma$ acts as a weaker control that at moderate $\ell\approx0.4$ counterbalances the $\ell$-driven changes, allowing continuous interpolation between highly damped phantom behavior and near-Schwarzschild behavior.
  • The greybody transmission bounds behave oppositely in the two branches: increasing $\ell$, $\gamma$, or $Q$ raises low-frequency transmission in the ordinary branch and lowers it in the phantom branch.
  • The sparsity of Hawking radiation decreases with $\ell$ and approaches $64\pi^3(\ell-1)^2/27$ at large horizon radius; in the phantom branch $\eta$ has a maximum at $r_+=\sqrt{3Q^2/[e^\gamma(\ell-1)]}$, marking a most-sparse phase that is absent in the ordinary branch.
  • The anomaly near $\ell\approx0.4$ in the time-domain profiles points to almost non-decaying modes or critical trapping, so the model predicts long-lived ringdown transients at intermediate Lorentz violation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such black holes exist, the tens-of-percent shifts in the fundamental quasinormal frequency relative to Schwarzschild could, in principle, be resolved in gravitational-wave ringdown data, making $\ell$ and $\gamma$ extractable from a single event; the paper itself does not perform such an inference.
  • Because the effective potentials deepen in the phantom branch, the eikonal and photon-sphere connection suggests the shadow diameter should also grow with $\ell$; a direct shadow calculation would be a clean testable extension the paper leaves implicit.
  • The sparsity peak in the phantom branch implies the evaporation history is non-monotonic: a black hole spends part of its lifetime emitting in a maximally quantum, discrete regime before returning to near-Schwarzschild emission; tracing the full evaporation would require coupling $\eta$ to the horizon mass evolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a class of static, spherically symmetric charged black hole solutions in a Lorentz-violating gravity theory in which ModMax electrodynamics is nonminimally coupled to a background Kalb-Ramond two-form field. With a vanishing cosmological constant, a potential minimum V'=0, and the imposed constraint η=ℓ/(2b²), it obtains the exact metric function (3.17) and electrostatic potential (3.16), which interpolate between Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström, and ModMax black holes. It then studies massless scalar, electromagnetic, and axial gravitational perturbations, computing quasinormal mode frequencies with Padé-averaged WKB methods and with Gundlach-Price-Pullin time-domain integration plus Prony extraction. The paper claims that increasing the Lorentz-violation parameter ℓ or the ModMax parameter γ raises both the real and imaginary parts of the QNM frequencies, i.e., faster damping, especially in the phantom (ζ=-1) sector. It further analyzes greybody factors using Visser-Boonserm bounds and computes the Hawking radiation sparsity η, reporting that η decreases with ℓ and approaches a scaled Schwarzschild value. The conclusion also highlights an anomalously long-lived mode at ℓ≈0.4 and a phantom-sector sparsity peak.

Significance. If the results were established, the paper would provide an exact two-parameter family of Lorentz-violating, nonlinear-electrodynamics black holes and a systematic perturbative characterization (QNMs, greybody bounds, and Hawking sparsity) that could be relevant for ringdown phenomenology. The manuscript has clear strengths: an exact analytical solution with explicit horizon structure and curvature invariants; clean limits to known geometries; two independent numerical methods for QNMs; and the use of a proven inequality for greybody bounds. However, these strengths do not compensate for the issues below. The headline damping trend is contradicted by the paper's own time-domain results in two of the three perturbation channels; the gravitational and electromagnetic perturbation equations are assumed rather than derived from the full action with nonminimal couplings; and a key identity underlying the matter Lagrangian is asserted without proof and is not generically true. The central phenomenological claims are therefore not currently supported.

major comments (5)
  1. [§4.5 vs. Abstract and Tables 1-3]
  2. [§4.4, Eq. (4.25), and §4.3, Eq. (4.21)]
  3. [§2, Eq. (2.9)]
  4. [§4.2.1, Tables 1-3]
  5. [§4.5 vs. §6]
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.4.1, Table captions]
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (5.11)]
  3. [§4.6]
  4. [§4.4.1 and §4.6]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's QNM, greybody, and sparsity results are forward-modeling outputs from the stated action and metric, with no parameter fitted to the predicted target quantities.

full rationale

The derivation chain runs from the action (2.1) and matter Lagrangian (2.13) to the field equations (2.14)-(2.19), then to the exact metric (3.17)-(3.18) and electrostatic potential (3.16). The quasinormal-mode spectra are obtained by inserting this metric into standard scalar, electromagnetic, and axial-gravitational Regge-Wheeler potentials (4.14), (4.21), (4.25) and solving with Pade-averaged WKB and GPP/Prony methods. No free parameter is fitted to the QNM frequencies, damping rates, greybody bounds, or sparsity values; the parameters ell, gamma, and zeta are chosen inputs and the claimed trends are read from the resulting tables. The greybody bound (5.2)-(5.4) is an application of the externally proven Visser-Boonserm inequality, and the sparsity formula (5.7) is a direct evaluation of the standard definition on the metric. The gravitational perturbation master equation is adopted rather than re-derived from the nonminimal couplings in the full action; this is a completeness or soundness assumption, not a circular reduction, because no target result is built into the assumption. The disagreement between the WKB tables and the time-domain statements in Sec. 4.5 (e.g., faster versus slower damping with ell for EM and gravitational channels) is an internal-consistency issue, not a circularity. Self-citations in the reference list (e.g., [46], [93], [94]) are contextual and carry no load-bearing weight in the derivations. No step exhibits a fitted input renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional identification, or a uniqueness claim imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The solution depends on free theory parameters (ell, gamma, zeta) and several imposed simplifications (Lambda = 0, V' = 0, eta = ell/(2b^2)). The least-justified input is the unproven identity (2.9) and the use of standard GR perturbation equations in a nonminimally coupled theory.

free parameters (5)
  • ell (Lorentz violation) = 0 to 0.8 in QNM tables; small per solar-system bounds
    Dimensionless KR-VEV parameter ell = xi_2 b^2 / 2; treated as a free theory parameter, not fitted to the paper's results.
  • gamma (ModMax nonlinearity) = 0 to 1 in QNM tables
    Free parameter of ModMax electrodynamics; constrained by causality to gamma >= 0.
  • zeta (branch sign) = +1 or -1
    Discrete sign flip selecting ordinary or phantom sector.
  • lambda (KR potential coupling) = unspecified
    Appears in V(X) = 1/2 lambda X^2 but drops out after V' = 0; not fixed.
  • b (KR VEV norm) = absorbed into ell via eta = ell / (2 b^2)
    The VEV norm b^2 is tied to eta and ell; not an independent parameter in the final metric.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption KR field action and VEV configuration with b_10 = -b_01 = E-tilde(r) and H_lambda mu nu = 0
    Sections 2-3; standard Kalb-Ramond vacuum configuration from refs [16,17].
  • domain assumption V(X) = 1/2 lambda X^2 and V' = 0 at the vacuum
    Eq. (3.6); required to obtain the exact solution.
  • domain assumption Vanishing cosmological constant Lambda = 0
    Section 3; removes de Sitter terms.
  • ad hoc to paper Consistency constraint eta = ell / (2 b^2)
    Section 3, after Eq. (3.15); imposed for the field equations to admit the solution.
  • ad hoc to paper The interaction term satisfies H-tilde_mu nu rho H-tilde^mu nu rho = 0 identically
    Eq. (2.9); asserted without proof and needed for the matter Lagrangian (2.13).
  • domain assumption Standard Regge-Wheeler master equations apply to the nonminimally coupled theory
    Section 4.4, Eq. (4.25); assumes GR axial perturbation equations describe the full theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kalb-Ramond Black Holes Sourced by ModMax Electrodynamics: Some Perturbative Properties in the Phantom Sector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RV3O35NU

@misc{pith2026250719088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kalb-Ramond Black Holes Sourced by ModMax Electrodynamics: Some Perturbative Properties in the Phantom Sector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RV3O35NU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19088}
}
abstract

We formulate and analyze a new class of electrically charged black hole (BH) solutions in Lorentz-violating gravity, where nonlinear ModMax electrodynamics is nonminimally coupled to a Kalb-Ramond (KR) two-form field. The spontaneous breaking of local Lorentz symmetry is triggered by a nonzero vacuum expectation value of the KR field, characterized by a small dimensionless parameter $\ell$. To incorporate both standard and phantom sectors, we introduce a discrete sign-flip parameter $\zeta = \pm1$, which flips the gauge-kinetic terms in the phantom ($\zeta = -1$) branch. Assuming a vanishing cosmological constant and a self-interacting potential with minimum $V' = 0$, we obtain exact analytical solutions for the metric function and electric potential. The resulting spacetime interpolates between Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordstrom, and ModMax BHs, with curvature scalars showing deviations controlled by $(\ell, \gamma, \zeta)$. We study scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational perturbations using both frequency-domain (Pade-averaged WKB) and time-domain (Gundlach-Price-Pullin plus Prony) methods. We find that increasing either $\ell$ or the ModMax parameter $\gamma$ enhances the real and imaginary parts of QNMs, indicating higher oscillation frequencies and faster damping, especially in the phantom sector. The effective potentials deepen under phantom deformation, supporting more tightly bound modes. Furthermore, we analyze the greybody factors and compute the sparsity $\eta$ of Hawking radiation, which quantifies the nonthermal character of particle emission. We show that $\eta$ is significantly affected by $\ell$, decreasing with increasing Lorentz violation and asymptotically approaching a scaled version of the Schwarzschild value.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Particle Dynamics and Thermal Properties in Kalb-Ramond ModMax Black Holes: Theoretical Predictions for Observational Tests of Exotic Physics

    gr-qc 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A parameter scan of geodesic, thermal, shadow, and lensing observables for Kalb-Ramond ModMax black holes, with sign errors in the temperature, specific heat, and deflection angle formulas.

  2. Accelerating electrically charged ModMax black hole solutions in $F(R)$ gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The electric-sector F(R)-ModMax accelerating black hole is the known F(R)-Maxwell C-metric solution with charge q e^{-γ/2}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Iyer and C.M

    S. Iyer and C.M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3621

    1987

  2. [2]

    Konoplya and A

    R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 793 [ 1102.4014]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Clifton, P.G

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Modified gravity and cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1 [ 1106.2476]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution , Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1 [ 1705.11098]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Kostelecky, Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model , Phys

    V.A. Kostelecky, Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 105009 [hep-th/0312310]

    arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Jacobson and D

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 024028 [ gr-qc/0007031]

    arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Mattingly, Modern tests of lorentz invariance , Living Rev

    D. Mattingly, Modern tests of lorentz invariance , Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005) 5 [ gr-qc/0502097]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Green, J.H

    M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (7, 1988)

    1988

  2. [10]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    Zwiebach, A first course in string theory , Cambridge University Press (7, 2006)

    B. Zwiebach, A first course in string theory , Cambridge University Press (7, 2006)

    2006

  4. [12]

    Kalb and P

    M. Kalb and P. Ramond, Classical direct interstring action , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2273

    1974

  5. [13]

    Kaloper, M

    N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. Lawrence and M.S. Sloth, Large field inflation and gravitational entropy, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 043510 [ 1511.05119]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bluhm and V.A

    R. Bluhm and V.A. Kosteleck` y,Spontaneous lorentz violation, nambu-goldstone modes, and gravity, Physical Review D–Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 71 (2005) 065008

    2005

  7. [15]

    Kostelecky and M

    V.A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Electrodynamics with lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015020 [ 0905.0031]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    O’Connor and B

    J. O’Connor and B. Altschul, Radiation from an oscillating dipole in the presence of photon-sector cpt and lorentz violation , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 045005 [ 2309.05648]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Paul, Antisymmetric tensor fields in modified gravity: a summary , Symmetry 12 (2020) 1573 [2009.07732]

    T. Paul, Antisymmetric tensor fields in modified gravity: a summary , Symmetry 12 (2020) 1573 [2009.07732]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kostelecky and S

    V.A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 683

    1989

  11. [19]

    Bailey and V.A

    Q.G. Bailey and V.A. Kostelecky, Signals for lorentz violation in post-newtonian gravity , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 045001 [ gr-qc/0603030]

    2006 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144 (1934) 425

    1934

  13. [21]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of dirac’s theory of positrons , Z. Phys. 98 (1936) 714 [physics/0605038]

    1936 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fradkin and A.A

    E.S. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin, Nonlinear electrodynamics from quantized strings, Phys. Lett. B 163 (1985) 123. – 40 –

    1985

  15. [23]

    Bandos, K

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P.K. Townsend, ModMax meets Susy, JHEP 10 (2021) 031 [2106.07547]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kuzenko and S.A

    S.M. Kuzenko and S.A. McCarthy, Nonlinear selfduality and supergravity, JHEP 02 (2003) 038 [hep-th/0212039]

    2003 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Flores-Alfonso, B.A

    D. Flores-Alfonso, B.A. Gonz´ alez-Morales, R. Linares and M. Maceda, Black holes and gravitational waves sourced by non-linear duality rotation-invariant conformal electromagnetic matter, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 136011 [ 2011.10836]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ballon Bordo, D

    A. Ballon Bordo, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak and T.R. Perche,Taub-nut solutions in conformal electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 817 (2021) 136312 [ 2011.13398]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Flores-Alfonso, R

    D. Flores-Alfonso, R. Linares and M. Maceda, Nonlinear extensions of gravitating dyons: from nut wormholes to taub-bolt instantons , JHEP 09 (2021) 104 [ 2012.03416]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Caldwell, A phantom menace? , Phys

    R.R. Caldwell, A phantom menace? , Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 23 [ astro-ph/9908168]

    2002 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Inhomogeneous equation of state of the universe: Phantom era, future singularity and crossing the phantom barrier , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 023003 [hep-th/0505215]

    2005 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sushkov, Wormholes supported by a phantom energy , Phys

    S.V. Sushkov, Wormholes supported by a phantom energy , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 043520 [gr-qc/0502084]

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking (1995)

    M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking (1995)

    1995

  24. [32]

    Lobo, Phantom energy traversable wormholes , Phys

    F.S.N. Lobo, Phantom energy traversable wormholes , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 084011 [gr-qc/0502099]

    2005 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cai, E.N

    Y.-F. Cai, E.N. Saridakis, M.R. Setare and J.-Q. Xia, Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations , Phys. Rept. 493 (2010) 1 [ 0909.2776]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Unifying phantom inflation with late-time acceleration: Scalar phantom-non-phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy , Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1285 [ hep-th/0506212]

    2006 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Carroll, M

    S.M. Carroll, M. Hoffman and M. Trodden, Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 023509 [ astro-ph/0301273]

    2003 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, The final state and thermodynamics of dark energy universe , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 103522 [ hep-th/0408170]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Gonzalez, F.S

    J.A. Gonzalez, F.S. Guzman and O. Sarbach, Instability of wormholes supported by a ghost scalar field. ii. nonlinear evolution , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 015011 [ 0806.1370]

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bronnikov and J.C

    K.A. Bronnikov and J.C. Fabris, Regular phantom black holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 251101 [gr-qc/0511109]

    2006 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Yurov, Phantom scalar fields result in inflation rather than big rip , Eur

    A. Yurov, Phantom scalar fields result in inflation rather than big rip , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126 (2011) 132 [ astro-ph/0305019]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A.O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 163001 [ 0905.2975]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cardoso, A.S

    V. Cardoso, A.S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V.T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064016 [ 0812.1806]

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Iyer and C.M

    S. Iyer and C.M. Will, Black-hole normal modes: A WKB approach. i. foundations and application of a higher-order WKB analysis of potential-barrier scattering , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3621

    1987

  35. [43]

    Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of kerr black holes , Proc

    E.W. Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of kerr black holes , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 402 (1985) 285. – 41 –

    1985

  36. [44]

    Gundlach, R.H

    C. Gundlach, R.H. Price and J. Pullin, Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 883 [ gr-qc/9307009]

    1994 arXiv

  37. [45]

    P. Pani, E. Barausse, E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Gravitational instabilities of superspinars , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044009 [ 1006.1863]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Baruah, Y

    A. Baruah, Y. Sekhmani, S.K. Maurya, A. Deshamukhya and M.K. Jasim, Quasinormal modes, grebody factors, and hawking radiation sparsity of black holes influenced by a global monopole charge in kalb-ramond gravity , 2502.13496

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Al-Badawi, D.J

    A. Al-Badawi, D.J. Gogoi, Y. Sekhmani and K. Boshkayev, Shadow and quasinormal modes of gup corrected grumiller black holes , Nucl. Phys. B 1015 (2025) 116900

    2025

  40. [48]

    Al-Badawi, Y

    A. Al-Badawi, Y. Sekhmani and K. Boshkayev, Shadow, quasinormal modes and hawking radiation of modmax black holes in a quintessence background , Phys. Dark Univ. 48 (2025) 101865

    2025

  41. [49]

    Sekhmani, S

    Y. Sekhmani, S. Zare, L.M. Nieto, H. Hassanabadi and K. Boshkayev, Black holes immersed in polytropic scalar field gas , JHEAp 47 (2025) 100389 [ 2501.10874]

    2025

  42. [50]

    Sekhmani, D.J

    Y. Sekhmani, D.J. Gogoi, S.K. Maurya, K. Boshkayev and M.K. Jasim, Quasinormal modes and greybody bounds of black holes endowed with modified chaplygin gas , JHEAp 45 (2025) 200

    2025

  43. [51]

    Al-Badawi, Y

    A. Al-Badawi, Y. Sekhmani, J. Rayimbaev and R. Myrzakulov, Shadows and quasinormal modes of black holes in the einstein-su(n) nonlinear sigma model , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 33 (2024) 2450043

    2024

  44. [52]

    Sekhmani, A.A.A

    Y. Sekhmani, A.A.A. Filho, R. Myrzakulov, A.Z. Kaczmarek, J. Rayimbaev and D. Szcz¸ e´ sniak, Dark matter effects of a black hole with nonsingular yukawa-modified potential in einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity, 2402.05344

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gogoi, J

    D.J. Gogoi, J. Bora, M. Koussour and Y. Sekhmani, Quasinormal modes and optical properties of 4-D black holes in Einstein Power-Yang–Mills gravity , Annals Phys. 458 (2023) 169447 [2306.14273]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Sekhmani and D.J

    Y. Sekhmani and D.J. Gogoi, Electromagnetic quasinormal modes of dyonic AdS black holes with quasitopological electromagnetism in a Horndeski gravity theory mimicking EGB gravity at D → 4, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20 (2023) 2350160 [ 2306.02919]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Rakhmanov, K

    S. Rakhmanov, K. Matchonov, H. Yusupov, K. Nasriddinov and D. Matrasulov, Optical high harmonic generation in dirac materials , Eur. Phys. J. B 98 (2025) 35 [ 2504.03599]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Akramov, C

    M. Akramov, C. Trunk, J. Yusupov and D. Matrasulov, Discrete schrodinger equation on graphs: An effective model for branched quantum lattice , EPL 147 (2024) 62001 [ 2411.14397]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Cirilo-Lombardo, Conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamic actions and its non-abelian extensions, Int

    D.J. Cirilo-Lombardo, Conformally invariant nonlinear electrodynamic actions and its non-abelian extensions, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20 (2023) 2350238

    2023

  50. [58]

    Kosyakov, Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries , Phys

    B.P. Kosyakov, Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries , Phys. Lett. B 810 (2020) 135840 [ 2007.13878]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kubiznak, T

    D. Kubiznak, T. Tahamtan and O. Svitek, Slowly rotating black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 104064 [ 2203.01919]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Majumdar and S

    P. Majumdar and S. SenGupta, Parity violating gravitational coupling of electromagnetic fields , Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) L89 [ gr-qc/9906027]

    1999 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Morris and K.S

    M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity , Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395

    1988

  54. [62]

    Bluhm, N.L

    R. Bluhm, N.L. Gagne, R. Potting and A. Vrublevskis, Constraints and Stability in Vector Theories with Spontaneous Lorentz Violation , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 125007 [ 0802.4071]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity , Cambridge University Press (7, 2019), 10.1017/9781108770385

    S.M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity , Cambridge University Press (7, 2019), 10.1017/9781108770385. – 42 –

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    Yang, Y.-Z

    K. Yang, Y.-Z. Chen, Z.-Q. Duan and J.-Y. Zhao, Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124004 [2308.06613]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Proceedings of the Third Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity , 1983

    1983

  58. [66]

    Schutz and C.M

    B.F. Schutz and C.M. Will, Black hole normal modes: a semianalytic approach , Astrophys. J. 291 (1985) L33

    1985

  59. [67]

    Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional schwarzschild black hole and the higher order wkb approach , Phys

    R.A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional schwarzschild black hole and the higher order wkb approach , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 024018

    2003

  60. [68]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Quasinormal modes of black holes: The improved semianalytic approach, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 024011

    2017

  61. [69]

    Konoplya, A

    R.A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko and A.F. Zinhailo, Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations , Class. Quantum Gravity 36 (2019) 155002

    2019

  62. [70]

    Konoplya and A

    R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 793

    2011

  63. [71]

    Chandrasekhar and J.L

    S. Chandrasekhar and J.L. Friedman, On the stability of axisymmetric systems to axisymmetric perturbations in general relativity. i. the equations governing nonstationary, and perturbed systems, Astrophysical Journal 175 (1972) 379

    1972

  64. [72]

    Bouhmadi-L´ opez, S

    M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, P. Chen and D.-h. Yeom, A consistent model of non-singular schwarzschild black hole in loop quantum gravity and its quasinormal modes , J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020 (2020) 066

    2020

  65. [73]

    Chandrasekhar, Selected Papers, Volume 6: The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes and of Colliding Plane Waves , vol

    S. Chandrasekhar, Selected Papers, Volume 6: The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes and of Colliding Plane Waves , vol. 6, University of Chicago Press (1991)

    1991

  66. [74]

    Abramowitz and I.A

    M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, vol. 55, Dover, New York (1964)

    1964

  67. [75]

    Chen and P

    C.-Y. Chen and P. Chen, Gravitational perturbations of nonsingular black holes in conformal gravity, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104003 [ 1902.01678]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gundlach, R.H

    C. Gundlach, R.H. Price and J. Pullin, Late-time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions. i. linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 883–889

    1994

  69. [77]

    Gundlach, R.H

    C. Gundlach, R.H. Price and J. Pullin, Late-time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions. ii. nonlinear evolution, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 890–899

    1994

  70. [78]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J.A. Gonzalez and U. Sperhake, Mining information from binary black hole mergers: a comparison of estimation methods for complex exponentials in noise , Physical Review D–Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 75 (2007) 124017

    2007

  71. [79]

    Visser, Some general bounds for 1-d scattering , Phys

    M. Visser, Some general bounds for 1-d scattering , Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 427 [quant-ph/9901030]

    1999 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Boonserm and M

    P. Boonserm and M. Visser, Bounding the greybody factors for schwarzschild black holes , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 101502 [ 0806.2209]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Z.-W. Long and Z. Xu,Probing hairy black holes caused by gravitational decoupling using quasinormal modes and greybody bounds , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 064042 [ 2203.11551]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Gray and M

    F. Gray and M. Visser, Greybody factors for schwarzschild black holes: Path-ordered exponentials and product integrals, Universe 4 (2018) 93 [ 1512.05018]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Ngampitipan and P

    T. Ngampitipan and P. Boonserm, Bounding the greybody factors for non-rotating black holes , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 22 (2013) 1350058 [ 1211.4070]. – 43 –

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Chowdhury and N

    A. Chowdhury and N. Banerjee, Greybody factor and sparsity of hawking radiation from a charged spherical black hole with scalar hair , Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135417 [ 2002.03630]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Miao and Z.-M

    Y.-G. Miao and Z.-M. Xu, Hawking radiation of five-dimensional charged black holes with scalar fields, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 542 [ 1704.07086]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Liu, Hawking temperature and the bound on greybody factors in d = 4 double field theory , Eur

    Y. Liu, Hawking temperature and the bound on greybody factors in d = 4 double field theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 1054 [ 2201.01279]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Barman, The hawking effect and the bounds on greybody factor for higher dimensional schwarzschild black holes , Eur

    S. Barman, The hawking effect and the bounds on greybody factor for higher dimensional schwarzschild black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 50 [ 1907.09228]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Xu and M.-H

    H. Xu and M.-H. Yung, Black hole evaporation in lovelock gravity with diverse dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 794 (2019) 77 [ 1904.06503]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Boonserm, T

    P. Boonserm, T. Ngampitipan and P. Wongjun, Greybody factor for black holes in drgt massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 492 [ 1705.03278]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Boonserm, T

    P. Boonserm, T. Ngampitipan and P. Wongjun, Greybody factor for black string in drgt massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 1

    2019

  83. [91]

    Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole, Phys

    D.N. Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 198

    1976

  84. [92]

    F. Gray, S. Schuster, A. Van-Brunt and M. Visser, The hawking cascade from a black hole is extremely sparse, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 115003 [ 1506.03975]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Sekhmani, B

    Y. Sekhmani, B. Hazarika, P. Phukon, A. Landry, S.K. Maurya and J. Rayimbaev, The d-dimensional charged ads black holes solutions in polytropic dark energy from barrow entropy , 2410.18247

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    Sekhmani, D.J

    Y. Sekhmani, D.J. Gogoi, M. Koussour, R. Myrzakulov and J. Rayimbaev, Shadows of r-charged black holes in ads5 , Phys. Dark Univ. 44 (2024) 101442

    2024

  87. [95]

    Turimov, S

    B. Turimov, S. Usanov and Y. Khamroev, Particles acceleration by Bocharova–Bronnikov– Bekenstein black hole , Phys. Dark Univ. 48 (2025) 101876 [ 2502.11185]. – 44 –

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.