Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Eliminating leading and subleading corrections to scaling in the three-dimensional XY universality class

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read By tuning the ratio of two couplings in a clock model on the cubic lattice, the leading correction to scaling in the three-dimensional XY universality class can be eliminated, yielding η=0.03816(2) and ν=0.671718(23).

desk verdict The most precise Monte Carlo exponents for the 3D XY class to date, with a clean two-improvement-point story; the untested correction window (2.0-3.4) is a legitimate caveat but unlikely to move the last digit. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19265 v1 pith:GZLLIYYS submitted 2025-07-25 cond-mat.stat-mech hep-lat

classification cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat PACS 05.50.+q64.60.Fr75.10.Hk
keywords three-dimensionalXYuniversalityclassclockmodelfinite-sizescalingcorrectionstoimprovedlatticemodelscriticalexponentsMonteCarlosimulationanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the 'improved model' strategy, tuning a Hamiltonian parameter so that the leading correction to scaling vanishes, can be extended to also control the subleading correction in the three-dimensional XY universality class. The author simulates a $q$-state clock model on the simple cubic lattice with an extra next-to-next-to-nearest-neighbor coupling $K_3$ and shows that at $r^*_K=(K_3/K_1)^*=0.1119(5)$ the amplitude of the leading correction vanishes, while the spatial anisotropy that causes subleading corrections is reduced by about a factor of nine. A nearby point $r^{\rm iso}_K=0.140(8)$ makes the anisotropy vanish instead, so the two special points nearly coincide. High-statistics Monte Carlo data at the improved point give $\eta=0.03816(2)$ and $y_t=1/\nu=1.48872(5)$, i.e., $\nu=0.671718(23)$, consistent with conformal-bootstrap results and several times more precise than the author's previous lattice estimates. The result gives a benchmark for the XY universality class and demonstrates how two correction amplitudes can be controlled in one lattice model.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the pair of amplitudes $b(D,r_K)$ and $c(D,r_K)$ of the leading irrelevant operator (correction exponent $\omega\approx0.789$) and of the lattice-anisotropy operator (correction exponent $\omega_{NR}=2.02548$) in the finite-size expansion of dimensionless quantities such as the Binder cumulant $U_4$ and the partition-function ratio $Z_a/Z_p$. The argument moves along the critical line of the two-parameter model, using $K_3$ and the dynamic-dilution parameter $D$ as handles, until $b(D,r_K)=0$; independently, the anisotropy amplitude $c(D,r_K)=0$ is located in the high-temperature phase from the direction dependence of the exponential correlation length, where $r_i-1\simeq a_i\xi^{-\omega_{NR}}$ for the $(1,1,0)$ and $(1,1,1)$ directions isolates the subleading operator. Improved observables such as $\chi_{\rm imp}=\chi U_4^p$ cancel the leading correction and stabilize the exponent estimates.

What would settle it

Compute the same dimensionless quantities at a point where the leading and subleading amplitudes are large, for example at $K_3=0$ or at $r_K\simeq0.15$, and refit the data including an additional correction with exponent near $3.0$ or $3.4$; if the estimates of $\eta$ or $y_t$ shift by more than the quoted uncertainty, the assumed correction spectrum is incomplete. Alternatively, extend the $K_3=0.0415$ dataset to $L=300$–$400$ and check whether fits with $L_{\min}\ge 24$ keep $\eta$ inside $0.03816(2)$ and $y_t$ inside $1.48872(5)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a two-parameter family of $(q+1)$-state clock models on the simple cubic lattice contains a point on the critical line where the leading correction to scaling has zero amplitude, and that the same family contains a nearby point where the leading spatial-anisotropy correction vanishes. For the pure clock model reached in the limit $D\to\infty$, the ratio $r_K=K_3/K_1$ can be tuned to $r^*_K=0.1119(5)$ to eliminate the leading correction; at the nearby isotropy point $r^{\rm iso}_K=0.140(8)$ the leading contribution to the spatial anisotropy vanishes, and at $r^*_K$ the residual anisotropy is smaller by a factor of about nine than at $K_3=0$. A finite-size scaling analysis of high-statistics data at $K_3=0.0415$, keeping the three correction terms with exponents $\omega=0.789$, $2-\eta$, and $\omega_{NR}=2.02548$, yields $\eta=0.03816(2)$, $y_t=1.48872(5)$ ($\nu=0.671718(23)$), along with fixed-point values $(Z_a/Z_p)^*=0.320380(8)$ and $U_4^*=1.242934(10)$, and the leading-correction zero at $D^*=1.063(6)$ for $K_3=0$. The paper states explicitly that, unlike the analogous Ising case, no point where both correction amplitudes vanish exactly was found in this model; the improved point only makes the subleading anisotropy small.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that finite-size corrections are completely described by the three known sources with exponents $\omega\approx0.789$, $2-\eta\approx1.962$, and $\omega_{NR}=2.02548$, and that all further corrections are negligible for lattice sizes $L=8$ to $13$ and above; if an unmodelled correction with exponent below about $3.4$ contributes non-negligibly, the quoted exponents and errors could be biased despite good fit quality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future lattice simulations of the 3D XY universality class can work at $K_3=0.0415$ (with $q\ge 24$) and reach exponent errors of a few $10^{-5}$ in $\eta$ and $y_t$ with linear lattice sizes up to $L=200$.
  • Because the leading-correction and isotropy points are close, simulating at $r^*_K$ suppresses the anisotropy-induced systematic error by roughly a factor of nine, equivalent to reducing the required linear lattice size by almost a factor of three and the volume by about a factor of 27.
  • The fixed-point values $(Z_a/Z_p)^*=0.320380(8)$ and $U_4^*=1.242934(10)$ give model-independent numbers that other methods and experiments in the same universality class can be tested against.
  • The new $\nu=0.671718(23)$ sharpens the known tension with the microgravity $^4$He measurement $\nu=0.6709(1)$, making a reanalysis or a new measurement of the $\lambda$-transition desirable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence left implicit in the paper is that the near-coincidence of $r^*_K$ and $r^{\rm iso}_K$ may be a general feature of $O(N)$ universality classes on the cubic lattice, since the leading and anisotropy operators have comparable dimensions; if so, a single tuned ratio could nearly eliminate both corrections for other $N$ as well.
  • If the same two-coupling construction is applied to $O(N)$ models with $N=3,4$ or to the diluted Ising model, where the leading correction exponent is small, the dominant systematic error could shift from the leading to the next operator, improving precision beyond what a single tuned parameter allows.
  • A testable extension is to run the same tuned ratio on a body-centered or face-centered cubic lattice; a change of lattice geometry would alter the anisotropy amplitude while leaving the leading-correction amplitude essentially unchanged, separating the two mechanisms in a controlled way.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the (q+1)-state clock model with nearest-neighbor and third-nearest-neighbor couplings on the simple cubic lattice, with the aim of removing leading and subleading corrections to scaling in the three-dimensional XY universality class. Using very high statistics Monte Carlo simulations, the author tunes the ratio rK=K3/K1 to eliminate the leading correction and finds that at a nearby value the anisotropy correction is reduced by about a factor of 9. Finite-size scaling of dimensionless observables (Za/Zp, U4, U6, ξ2nd/L) and of the magnetic susceptibility yields η=0.03816(2) and yt=1/ν=1.48872(5), consistent with conformal bootstrap results and improving on the author's previous Monte Carlo estimates.

Significance. If the quoted error bars are robust, this is the most accurate Monte Carlo determination of the 3D XY critical exponents to date, with precision comparable to the conformal bootstrap. The work also extends the improved-model program by showing that in a two-parameter family one can eliminate the leading correction while substantially reducing the subleading correction, even though both cannot be made to vanish simultaneously. The numerical effort (about 60 core-years at the optimal point) and the cross-checks among multiple observables, four FSS Ansätze, and Lmin stability are exemplary. The paper is also candid about residual systematic uncertainties, explicitly warning in Sec. V.D that an acceptable χ² says little about corrections not included in the Ansatz.

major comments (2)
  1. [V.C and V.E; Eqs. (29), (40), (43)] The FSS model space leaves the correction-exponent window between about 2.025 and 3.6 untested. The jmax=4 fits with ǫ4=3.6 (Sec. V.C) do not include terms such as L^{-(ω+ω_NR)} ≈ L^{-2.814}, which are generated by products of the leading and lattice-anisotropy scaling fields and are explicitly ignored in Sec. V.C because the amplitude b_i is asserted to be small. No quantitative bound on this amplitude is provided. Since the final error bars in Eqs. (41) and (44) are estimated from the spread over fits that all omit this term, a non-negligible amplitude in the window (2.025, 3.6) would bias η and y_t beyond the quoted errors. I request a fit that includes a correction at exponent ω+ω_NR, or an equivalent direct estimate of its amplitude from the data, together with a discussion of the resulting shift in the central values.
  2. [V.C, V.D, Appendix A] The statistical errors of the Taylor coefficients used to extrapolate observables from K1,s to K1,c are ignored in the fits (Sec. V.C), and the improved-observable exponents p are fixed at values obtained from Eq. (A4) without propagating their errors (Sec. V.D and Appendix A). Given that the data have statistical errors at the 10^{-5} level, these ignored uncertainties could be comparable to the quoted error bars. Please demonstrate that the final estimates in Eqs. (41) and (44) and their error bars are stable when these uncertainties are propagated, or provide a quantitative statement of why the effect is negligible.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The term "unisotropy" should be replaced by "anisotropy" (abstract, Sec. IV, Fig. 1, and elsewhere).
  2. [V.C] The sentence "In the case of AA and BB, ǫ4=3.6 is used" appears to contain a typo; it should read "AA and AB."
  3. [III.A, Eq. (17)] The list of values for Yq uses ellipses in a way that is difficult to follow; consider presenting the values in a table or in a more explicit sequence.
  4. [IV.C, Eq. (27) and surrounding text] The notation for the subleading anisotropy exponent, ω'_NR, is defined implicitly in Eq. (27); please define it explicitly at first use.
  5. [V.E] In the bullet list describing the corrections for the various slopes, the term "L^{-yt-ω}" would be clearer as "L^{-(yt+ω)}".
  6. [V.C] The statement "For a discussion of χ/D.O.F. and the corresponding p-value see appendix A of Ref. [50]" sends the reader to a different paper; a brief sentence defining the acceptance criterion here would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: final η and y_t are free parameters in direct susceptibility/slope fits, improvement points are direct fit results, and the fixed correction exponents are external with explicit robustness checks.

full rationale

The central numerical claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The final η is extracted from fits of χ and χimp using Ansätze (39) and (40), where η is a free parameter; only ω_NR=2.02548 is fixed, and the paper explicitly states that replacing ω_NR by 2 changes the η estimates only a little, so the result does not depend critically on the external CB input. The final y_t is obtained from slope fits with Ansatz (43), with y_t free and ε=ω_NR, and the paper checks that using ε=2−η instead gives only small changes. The improved-observable exponents p used to form χimp and Simp are fitted in Appendix A from independent q=8 data at D=0.9 and 1.24 taken from Ref. [13]; those fits do not determine the target exponents, so this is not a fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction step. The improvement points r*_K and r_iso are output parameters of the FSS fits (29)-(31), and r_iso is cross-checked against the independent correlation-length anisotropy analysis leading to Eq. (28). The correction exponents ω and ω_NR are taken from conformal bootstrap and other external sources, not from a self-citation chain. The paper's own warning that 'a χ2/DOF close to one or an acceptable p-value of the fit says little about possible systematic errors' identifies an omitted-correction systematic in the roughly (2.025,3.4) window; that is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction, because no equation in the paper is equivalent to its input by definition. Self-citations to Refs. [8,13] are used for data, motivation, and comparisons, but they are not load-bearing in the sense of making the claimed exponents equal to fitted inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The auxiliary fitted parameters are the exponents p and amplitude ratios used to construct improved observables, plus the fitted locations D*, K*_3, and K_iso^3 of the improvement points. The headline exponents eta and y_t are also fit outputs, but they are the paper's contribution rather than upstream assumptions. The fixed correction exponents from conformal bootstrap and related literature are entered as axioms because the analysis imports them rather than measuring them.

free parameters (8)
  • p (improved susceptibility, fixed Za/Zp) = -0.98(1)
    Multiplier U4^p used to remove the leading correction in chi; fitted from q=8 data at D=0.9 and 1.24 (Appendix A), then applied to D=infinity, K3>0 data.
  • p (improved susceptibility, fixed xi_2nd/L) = -0.45(1)
    Same construction as above but used when fixing xi_2nd/L=0.592363.
  • p (improved slope S_Za/Zp,imp) = 0.92(4)
    Multiplier used to eliminate leading corrections in the thermal slope at fixed Za/Zp.
  • p (improved combined slope ISUM) = 0.22(4)
    Multiplier used in the linear combination S_Za/Zp - c U4, improved.
  • r_{Za/Zp,U4,1} = -0.415(15)
    Ratio of leading-correction amplitudes used to construct a slope combination free of the leading scaling field.
  • D* = 1.063(6)
    Crystal-field value for K3=0 where the leading correction vanishes; fit output from joint FSS.
  • K*_3 = 0.04149(14)
    Coupling for D=infinity where the leading correction vanishes; fit output from joint FSS.
  • K_iso^3 = 0.0498(23)
    Coupling for D=infinity where the subleading anisotropy correction vanishes; fit output from joint FSS, consistent with the direct high-temperature estimate.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The simulated clock models with q>=12 and D=infinity, at criticality, are in the basin of attraction of the O(2)-invariant fixed point, and finite-q corrections are negligible.
    Invoked throughout; supported by Eq. (17) large-charge estimates and Refs. [13,33,34]. If false, the exponents would not be XY values.
  • domain assumption Numerical values of correction exponents omega=0.789 and omega_NR=2.02548, and the fixed-point value eta=0.03817, taken from conformal bootstrap, FRG, and prior literature, are accurate enough for FSS.
    Used as fixed inputs in Eqs. (29), (40), and (43). The author checks some sensitivity to 2-eta versus omega_NR but does not measure omega itself.
  • domain assumption FSS expansions with jmax=3 or 4, omitting L^{-2*omega} and L^{-omega-omega_NR} corrections, are complete for L>=8-13.
    Central numerical assumption; validated by Lmin stability and multiple Ansatze, but not proven.
  • domain assumption Amplitudes c_{i,j}(D,K3) are smooth and approximated by low-order Taylor polynomials near D*, K*_3.
    Parameterization in Eqs. (30) and (31); plausible for the small parameter range studied, affects estimates of D*, K*_3, and K_iso^3.
  • domain assumption Za/Zp is free of the analytic background of the magnetic susceptibility, while U4, U6, and xi_2nd/L are not.
    Used to prefer Za/Zp for y_t and to justify the K_iso^3 estimate; from RG analysis cited in Ref. [13].
  • domain assumption The spatial anisotropy follows r_i-1 = a_i xi^{-omega_NR} + ... in Eq. (27), with omega_NR=2.02548.
    Used to locate r_iso from high-temperature correlation lengths in three lattice directions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eliminating leading and subleading corrections to scaling in the three-dimensional XY universality class." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GZLLIYYS

@misc{pith2026250719265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eliminating leading and subleading corrections to scaling in the three-dimensional XY universality class},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GZLLIYYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19265}
}
abstract

We study the $(q+1)$-state clock model on the simple cubic lattice by using Monte Carlo simulations. In addition to the nearest neighbor coupling we consider a next-to-next-to-nearest neighbor coupling. For a certain range of the parameters, the phase transition of the model shares the XY universality class. Leading corrections to scaling are studied by using finite size scaling of dimensionless quantities, such as the Binder cumulant $U_4$. The spatial unisotropy, which causes subleading corrections, is studied by computing the exponential correlation length $\xi_{exp}$ in the high temperature phase for different directions. In the case of the $q$-state clock model it turns out that by tuning the ratio of the two coupling constants, we can eliminate either leading or subleading corrections to scaling. These points on the critical line are close to each other. Hence in the improved model, where leading corrections to scaling vanish, also subleading corrections are small. By using a finite size scaling analysis of our high statistics data we obtain $\eta=0.03816(2)$ and $y_t =1/\nu=1.48872(5)$ as estimates of the critical exponents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19265 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. We sketch possible scenarios for the zeros of the lead [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. We plot estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conjecture on the lower bound of the length-scale critical exponent $\nu$ at continuous phase transitions

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-10 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    For LGW Φ^4 theories the paper conjectures Δ_ε ≥ 2Δ_φ, yielding ν ≥ (2−η)^{-1} and γ ≥ 1 at continuous transitions.

  2. Accurate boundary bootstrap for the three-dimensional O($N$) normal universality class

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    High-truncation eta-minimization bootstrap yields accurate boundary critical amplitudes for the 3d O(N) normal universality class, resolving prior Monte Carlo discrepancies and giving new Ising boundary data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and the ǫ-expansion, Phys. Rep. C 12, 75 (1974)

  2. [2]

    M. E. Fisher, The renormalization group in the theory of critical behavio r, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 597 (1974), Erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 543 (1975)

  3. [3]

    5) (Cambridge University Press, Cambr idge, 1996)

    John Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , Series: Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (No. 5) (Cambridge University Press, Cambr idge, 1996)

  4. [4]

    M. E. Fisher, Renormalization group theory: Its basis and formulation in statistical physics , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 653 (1998)

  5. [5]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical Phenomena and Renormalization-Group Theory , [arXiv:cond-mat/0012164], Phys. Rept. 368, 549 (2002)

  6. [6]

    Swendsen and Jian-Sheng Wang, Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations, Phys

    Robert H. Swendsen and Jian-Sheng Wang, Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987)

  7. [7]

    Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems , Phys

    U. Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361 (1989)

  8. [8]

    for the Ising universality class in three dimensions. Below, we first simulate K3 = 0 at D ≈ D∗ and D → ∞ to establish so to speak the baseline and to check that the behavior of the spatial unisotropy is compatible with the theoretical prediction for the exponent ωN R. Then, for D → ∞ , we search for riso K , where 11 the leading contribution to the spatia...

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precisi on Islands in the Ising and O(N ) Models, [arXiv:1603.04436], J. High Energ. Phys. 08 (2016) , 36

  2. [10]

    Simmons-Duffin, The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT , [arXiv:1612.08471], J

    D. Simmons-Duffin, The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT , [arXiv:1612.08471], J. High Energ. Phys. 03 (2017), 86

  3. [11]

    Martin Hasenbusch, Restoring isotropy in a three-dimensional lattice model: T he Ising uni- versality class, [arXiv:2105.09781], Phys. Rev. B 104, 014426 (2021)

  4. [12]

    Erramilli, Alexandre Homrich, Petr Kravchuk, 37 Aike Liu, Matthew S

    Cyuan-Han Chang, Vasiliy Dommes, Rajeev S. Erramilli, Alexandre Homrich, Petr Kravchuk, 37 Aike Liu, Matthew S. Mitchell, David Poland, David Simmons- Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising Stress Tensor , [arXiv:2411.15300], J. High Energ. Phys. 03 (2025), 136

  5. [13]

    Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensi ons, [arXiv:1910.05916], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensi ons, [arXiv:1910.05916], Phys. Rev. B 100, 224517 (2019)

  6. [14]

    For a more comprehensive comparison with the literature see Sec

    gives yt = 3 − 1.51136(22) = 1 .48864(22). For a more comprehensive comparison with the literature see Sec. VI below. 30 8 12 16 20 24 L min 1.48855 1.48860 1.48865 1.48870 1.48875 1.48880 y t B I BSUM ISUM FIG. 9. We plot estimates of yt obtained by using the Ansatz (43) vers...

  7. [15]

    Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising mode l CFT , [arXiv:2111.12093] J

    M. Reehorst, Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising mode l CFT , [arXiv:2111.12093] J. High Energ. Phys. 09 (2022), 177

  8. [16]

    Slava Rychkov and Ning Su, New Developments in the Numerical Conformal Bootstrap , [arXiv:2311.15844], Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045004 (2024)

  9. [17]

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-D uffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents , [arXiv:1912.03324], J. High Energ. Phys. 06 (2020), 142

  10. [18]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Tech- niques, and Applications , [arXiv:1805.04405], Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 15002 (2019)

  11. [19]

    J. A. Lipa, J. A. Nissen, D. A. Stricker, D. R. Swanson and T. C. P. Chui, Specific heat of liquid helium in zero gravity very near the λ-point, [arXiv:cond-mat/0310163], Phys. Rev. B 68, 174518 (2003)

  12. [20]

    J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, T. C. P. Chui, and U . E. Israelsson, Heat Capacity and Thermal Relaxation of Bulk Helium very near the Lambda Po int, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 944 (1996)

  13. [21]

    J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, Z. K. Geng, P. R. Wi lliamson, D. A. Stricker, T. C. P. Chui, U. E. Israelsson, and M. Larson, Specific Heat of Helium Confined to a 57- µm Planar Geometry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4894 (2000)

  14. [22]

    Wanwan Xu, Yanan Sun, Jian-Ping Lv, and Youjin Deng, High-precision Monte Carlo study of several models in the three-dimensional U (1) universality class , [arXiv:1908.10990], Phys. Rev. B 100, 064525 (2019)

  15. [23]

    Guida and J

    R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, Critical exponents of the N vector model , [arXiv:cond- mat/9803240], J. Phys. A 31, 8103 (1998)

  16. [24]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vi cari, The critical exponents of the superfluid transition in He4 , [cond-mat/0605083], published as Theoretical estimates of the critical exponents of the superfluid transition in He4 by lat tice methods , Phys. Rev. B 74, ...

  17. [25]

    Campostrini, M

    M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi , and E. Vicari, Critical behavior of the three-dimensional XY universality class, [cond-mat/0010360], Phys. Rev. B 63, 214503 (2001)

  18. [26]

    Teitel, Finite-size scaling study of the three-dimensional classi cal XY 38 model, Phys

    Ying-Hong Li and S. Teitel, Finite-size scaling study of the three-dimensional classi cal XY 38 model, Phys. Rev. B 40, 9122 (1989)

  19. [27]

    Yukihiro Komura and Yutaka Okabe, CUDA programs for GPU computing of Swendsen-Wang multi-cluster spin flip algorithm: 2D and 3D Ising, Potts, an d XY models , [arXiv:1403.7560], Computer Physics Communications 185 (2014) 1038

  20. [28]

    Amit and Luca Peliti, On dangerous irrelevant operators , Annals of Physics 140, 207 (1982)

    Daniel J. Amit and Luca Peliti, On dangerous irrelevant operators , Annals of Physics 140, 207 (1982)

  21. [29]

    Johan Henriksson, The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data , [arXiv:2201.09520], Physics Reports 1002, 1 (2023)

  22. [30]

    Nelson, Coexistence-curve singularities in isotropic ferromagne ts, Phys

    David R. Nelson, Coexistence-curve singularities in isotropic ferromagne ts, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2222 (1976)

  23. [31]

    Gabriel Cuomo, J. M. Viana Parente Lopes, Jos´ e Matos, J ´ ulio Oliveira, and Jo˜ ao Penedones, Numerical tests of the large charge expansion , [arXiv:2305.00499], J. High Energ. Phys. 05 (2024), 161

  24. [32]

    Alvarez-Gaume, O

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, O. Loukas, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert, Compensating strong coupling with large charge , [arXiv:1610.04495], J. High Energ. Phys. 04 (2017), 059

  25. [33]

    Banerjee, S

    D. Banerjee, S. Chandrasekharan, and D. Orlando, Conformal dimensions via large charge expansion, [arXiv:1707.00711], Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061603 (2018)

  26. [34]

    H. Shao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, Monte Carlo Renormalization Flows in the Space of Relevant and Irrelevant Operators: Application to Three -Dimensional Clock Models , [arXiv:1905.13640], Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 080602 (2020)

  27. [35]

    Hasenbusch and E

    M. Hasenbusch and E. Vicari, Anisotropic perturbations in three-dimensional O(N)-sym metric vector models , [arXiv:1108.0491], Phys. Rev. B 84, 125136 (2011)

  28. [36]

    Hove and A

    J. Hove and A. Sudbø, Criticality versus q in the (2 + 1) -dimensional Zq clock model , [arXiv:cond-mat/0301499], Phys. Rev. E 68, 046107 (2003)

  29. [37]

    For example for l = 8 one gets ωl=8 ≈ 6.03

    we see that ωl rapidly increases with l. For example for l = 8 one gets ωl=8 ≈ 6.03. C. Dependence of the amplitudes of corrections on the parameters Finite size scaling (FSS) determines the behavior of dimensionless qua ntities at the critical point on a finite lattice. As exa...

  30. [38]

    Hofmann, an d Yin-Chen He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3D Ising transition: State-opera tor correspondence from a fuzzy sphere regularization , [arXiv:2210.13482], Phys

    Wei Zhu, Chao Han, Emilie Huffman, Johannes S. Hofmann, an d Yin-Chen He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3D Ising transition: State-opera tor correspondence from a fuzzy sphere regularization , [arXiv:2210.13482], Phys. Rev. X 13, 021009 (2023)

  31. [39]

    De Polsi, I

    G. De Polsi, I. Balog, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Precision calculation of critical ex- 39 ponents in the O(N ) universality classes with the nonperturbative renormaliz ation group , [arXiv:2001.07525], Phys. Rev. E 101, 042113 (2020)

  32. [40]

    High Energ

    Junyu Liu, David Meltzer, David Poland, David Simmons- Duffin, The Lorentzian inversion formula and the spectrum of the 3d O(2) CFT [arXiv:2007.07914], J. High Energ. Phys. 09 (2020), 115

  33. [41]

    Junyu Liu and David Simmons-Duffin, private communicati on

  34. [42]

    A. N. Manashov, E. D. Skvortsov and M. Strohmaier, Higher spin currents in the critical O(N ) vector model at 1/N2, [arXiv:1706.09256], J. High Energ. Phys. 08 (2017), 106

  35. [43]

    S. E. Derkachov, J. A. Gracey and A. N. Manashov, Four loop anomalous dimensions of gradient operators in φ4 theory, [arXiv:hep-ph/9705268] Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 569 (1998)

  36. [44]

    Hasenbusch, A Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional XY universality class: Universal amplitude ratios , [arXiv:0810.2716], J

    M. Hasenbusch, A Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional XY universality class: Universal amplitude ratios , [arXiv:0810.2716], J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P12006

  37. [45]

    Hasenbusch, Variance-reduced estimator of the connected two-point fun ction in the pres- ence of a broken Z2-symmetry, [arXiv:1512.02491], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Variance-reduced estimator of the connected two-point fun ction in the pres- ence of a broken Z2-symmetry, [arXiv:1512.02491], Phys. Rev. E 93, 032140 (2016)

  38. [46]

    Patra and M

    M. Patra and M. Karttunen, Stencils with Isotropic Discretization Error for Differenti al Op- erators, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 22, 936 (2006)

  39. [47]

    Hasenbusch, K

    M. Hasenbusch, K. Pinn, and S. Vinti, Critical Exponents of the 3D Ising Universality Class From Finite Size Scaling With Standard and Improved Actions , [arXiv:hep-lat/9806012], Phys. Rev. B 59, 11471 (1999)

  40. [48]

    https://prng.di.unimi.it/

  41. [49]

    Blackman and S

    D. Blackman and S. Vigna, Scrambled Linear Pseudorandom Number Generators , [arXiv:1805.01407], ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 47, 36 (2021)

  42. [50]

    https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/does-it-beat-the-minimal-standard.html

  43. [51]

    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_(Zufallszahlengenerator)

  44. [52]

    SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenn e Twister: a 128-bit Pseudoran- dom Number Generator

    M. Saito and M. Matsumoto, “SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenn e Twister: a 128-bit Pseudoran- dom Number Generator”, in Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006 , edited by A. Keller, S. Heinrich, H. Niederreiter, (Springer, 2008); M. Saito, Masters thesis, Math. Dept., Graduat...

  45. [53]

    Hasenbusch, φ4 lattice model with cubic symmetry in three dimensions: Reno rmalization 40 group flow and first-order phase transitions , [arXiv:2307.05165], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, φ4 lattice model with cubic symmetry in three dimensions: Reno rmalization 40 group flow and first-order phase transitions , [arXiv:2307.05165], Phys. Rev. B 109, 054420 (2024)

  46. [54]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant et al., SciPy 1.0–Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , [arXiv:1907.10121], Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

  47. [55]

    J. D. Hunter, ”Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 90 (2007)

  48. [56]

    Hasenfratz and F

    P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, Perfect lattice action for asymptotically free theories , [arXiv:hep-lat/9308004], Nucl. Phys. B 414, 785 (1994)

  49. [57]

    Hasenbusch, Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dim ensional Ising universality class, [arXiv:1004.4486], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dim ensional Ising universality class, [arXiv:1004.4486], Phys. Rev. B 82, 174433 (2010)

  50. [58]

    Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of a generalized icosahedral model on the s imple cubic lattice, [arXiv:2005.04448], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Monte Carlo study of a generalized icosahedral model on the s imple cubic lattice, [arXiv:2005.04448], Phys. Rev. B 102, 024406 (2020)

  51. [59]

    Hasenbusch, Three-dimensional O (N )-invariant models at criticality for N ≥ 4, [arXiv:2112.03783], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Three-dimensional O (N )-invariant models at criticality for N ≥ 4, [arXiv:2112.03783], Phys. Rev. B 105, 054428 (2022)

  52. [60]

    Martin Hasenbusch, Francesco Parisen Toldin, Andrea P elissetto, and Ettore Vicari, Univer- sality class of 3D site-diluted and bond-diluted Ising syst ems, [arXiv:cond-mat/0611707], J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P02016

  53. [61]

    Hasenbusch, Cubic fixed point in three dimensions: Monte Carlo simulatio ns of the model on the simple cubic lattice , [arXiv:2211.16170], Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Cubic fixed point in three dimensions: Monte Carlo simulatio ns of the model on the simple cubic lattice , [arXiv:2211.16170], Phys. Rev. B 107, 024409 (2023)

  54. [62]

    K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 240 (1972)

  55. [63]

    Butera and M

    P. Butera and M. Comi, N-vector spin models on the sc and the bcc lattices: a study of the critical behavior of the susceptibility and of the correlat ion length by high temperature series extended to order β21 , [arXiv:hep-lat/9703018], Phys. Rev. B 56, 8212 (1997)

  56. [64]

    Swendsen, Monte Carlo renormalization-group study of the d = 3 planar model , Phys

    Robert H. Swendsen, Monte Carlo renormalization-group study of the d = 3 planar model , Phys. Rev. B 27, 391 (1983)

  57. [65]

    Janke, Test of single cluster update for the three-dimensional XY m odel, Phys

    W. Janke, Test of single cluster update for the three-dimensional XY m odel, Phys. Lett. A 148, 306 (1990)

  58. [66]

    Hasenbusch and T

    M. Hasenbusch and T. T¨ or¨ ok,High precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D XY-universality class, [arXiv:cond-mat/9904408], J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 6361 (1999)

  59. [67]

    Singasaas and G

    A. Singasaas and G. Ahlers, Universality of static properties near the superfluid trans ition in 41 4 He, Phys. Rev. B 30, 5103 (1984)

  60. [68]

    Oleaga, A

    A. Oleaga, A. Salazar, D. Prabhakaran, J.G. Cheng, and J .S. Zhou, Critical behavior of the paramagnetic to antiferromagnetic transition in ortho rhombic and hexagonal phases of RMnO3 (R=Sm, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Y) Phys. Rev. B 85, 184425 (2012)

  61. [69]

    Oleaga, A

    A. Oleaga, A. Salazar, and Yu M. Bunkov, 3D-XY critical behavior of CsMnF 3 from static and dynamic thermal properties , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 096001 (2014)

  62. [70]

    M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer, Minimally subtracted six-loop renormalization of φ4- symmetric theory and critical exponents , [arXiv:1705.06483], Phys. Rev. D 96, 036016 (2017)

  63. [71]

    Schnetz, Phys

    O. Schnetz, Phys. Rev. D 97, 085018 (2018); Maple package Hyper- logProcedrues, which is available on the Oliver Schnetz’s h omepage: https://www.math.fau.de/person/oliver-schnetz/

  64. [72]

    Shalaby, Critical exponents of the O(N)-symmetric φ4 model from the ǫ7 hypergeometric-Meijer resummation , [arXiv:2005.12714], Eur

    Abouzeid M. Shalaby, Critical exponents of the O(N)-symmetric φ4 model from the ǫ7 hypergeometric-Meijer resummation , [arXiv:2005.12714], Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 87 (2021). 42

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.