Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models?

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 39 of 39 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.21302.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2507.21302 v1

Coverage vector

measured 39 of 39 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.312988Z

measured 39 of 39 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

39 of 39 outbound references displayed

verified exact8
verified fuzzy24
unresolved6
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier1
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 5ab510bd-95c9-4d9c-be81-5c00656768b5 · outbound

This paper cites Ai-driven clinical decision support systems: an ongoing pursuit of potential.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Ai-driven clinical decision support systems: an ongoing pursuit of potential

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.919167Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2c7e05a9-89e5-4b07-83b7-9ab22879528f · outbound

This paper cites Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.148653Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation eaf5b8b6-7bab-4655-878b-642b6e14d7a5 · outbound

This paper cites Evaluating and Characterizing Human Rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Evaluating and Characterizing Human Rationales

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.561756Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 2d5e0670-5170-431e-8652-154fdc2233b0 · outbound

This paper cites Knife: Distilling meta- reasoning knowledge with free-text rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Knife: Distilling meta- reasoning knowledge with free-text rationales

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.905516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d1a9cd3a-ca80-4190-8839-9599945a3e77 · outbound

This paper cites Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context Learning.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context Learning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.542592Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4b79bb45-4ad2-424e-93e6-87aaad72a61b · outbound

This paper cites Large language models are clinical reasoners: Reasoning- aware diagnosis framework with prompt-generated rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Large language models are clinical reasoners: Reasoning- aware diagnosis framework with prompt-generated rationales

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.891897Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4382dbe0-193b-4b63-9eda-e6a900e31810 · outbound

This paper cites Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.878686Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e7218c9e-aaf5-4d0b-a409-29067a79cf92 · outbound

This paper cites annotator rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? annotator rationales

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.864377Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3aa08243-54e6-4dba-ad86-50ad37b2944a · outbound

This paper cites Rationale-augmented convolutional neural networks for text clas- sification.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Rationale-augmented convolutional neural networks for text clas- sification

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.850321Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 87872b0b-4df5-4303-9950-0f4e9bac858d · outbound

This paper cites Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationales

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.523516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f7b6eee7-9ae4-4345-8474-de28a295db67 · outbound

This paper cites Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?

Reference 11

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.503196Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e7145913-d836-4cff-b8f2-a92bb6f896e0 · outbound

This paper cites Fine-grained Sentiment Analysis with Faithful Attention.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Fine-grained Sentiment Analysis with Faithful Attention

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.195671Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9102abd2-de98-40af-b48f-d35371b8f5f9 · outbound

This paper cites Marta: Leveraging human rationales for explainable text classification.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Marta: Leveraging human rationales for explainable text classification

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.837115Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f746415d-f886-47ae-828a-3bb9fec51aff · outbound

This paper cites Human-like explanation for text classification with limited attention supervision.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Human-like explanation for text classification with limited attention supervision

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.824105Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1d4f5c23-f120-4d64-b688-56d03319fb9e · outbound

This paper cites Learning with rationales for document classification.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Learning with rationales for document classification

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.810845Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0868a2b8-c7c4-4e30-9ac4-77def29b771e · outbound

This paper cites Rationale production to support clinical decision-making.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Rationale production to support clinical decision-making

Reference 16

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.470556Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 53f2f937-d927-452b-8d21-070af4829ff4 · outbound

This paper cites Explain and predict, and then predict again.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Explain and predict, and then predict again

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.797695Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation afafb91c-1eda-4efa-85c5-0a205022edaa · outbound

This paper cites Evaluating explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students? Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:359–375, 2022.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Evaluating explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students? Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:359–375, 2022

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.784698Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 7b8f7b97-e4b5-4cf1-a4a9-bb60a400cf11 · outbound

This paper cites Rationalization for explainable nlp: a survey.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Rationalization for explainable nlp: a survey

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.771527Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 9ce6dd69-dc05-4d34-8766-e9d4ad9902fc · outbound

This paper cites Exploring the Trade-off Between Model Performance and Explanation Plausibility of Text Classifiers Using Human Rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Exploring the Trade-off Between Model Performance and Explanation Plausibility of Text Classifiers Using Human Rationales

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.451082Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 702ed879-b2c9-44b5-84fb-4fc98fa3e07f · outbound

This paper cites Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretability.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretability

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.233455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 50a6cc3e-bb13-4f6a-b7d1-d50f84c201b3 · outbound

This paper cites https://seer.cancer.gov/data-software/.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? https://seer.cancer.gov/data-software/

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.758756Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation da7f39e7-a5c7-4edf-bc4e-d1c50dedba95 · outbound

This paper cites ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.242009Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b3aeeaf0-21df-465f-8482-f939e381c65f · outbound

This paper cites Machine learning and deep learning tools for the automated capture of cancer surveillance data.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Machine learning and deep learning tools for the automated capture of cancer surveillance data

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.745164Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 886f9713-b0d0-48af-8488-34896d57ea0d · outbound

This paper cites SEER*DMS User Manual: Chapter 14 - Annotation Tasks, 2020.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? SEER*DMS User Manual: Chapter 14 - Annotation Tasks, 2020

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.731607Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 48de48a3-c915-46ba-a8ad-1120514bbc2d · outbound

This paper cites A comparative study of large language model-based zero-shot inference and task-specific supervised classification of breast cancer pathology reports.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? A comparative study of large language model-based zero-shot inference and task-specific supervised classification of breast cancer pathology reports

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.718086Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c260ea40-f35a-4f49-b712-efdf6d756d45 · outbound

This paper cites Clinical-Longformer and Clinical-BigBird: Transformers for long clinical sequences.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Clinical-Longformer and Clinical-BigBird: Transformers for long clinical sequences

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.259011Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f98b7f3b-a1d1-416e-b9b2-e492f32293ff · outbound

This paper cites Attention mechanisms in clinical text classification: A comparative evaluation.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Attention mechanisms in clinical text classification: A comparative evaluation

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.703666Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation be1a4063-5032-4790-86af-b67b80e5830c · outbound

This paper cites Deformable phrase level attention: A flexible approach for improving ai based medical coding.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Deformable phrase level attention: A flexible approach for improving ai based medical coding

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.689070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 01fd4208-c06f-455f-81bb-afd41d38f1b8 · outbound

This paper cites Text classification algorithms: A survey.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Text classification algorithms: A survey

Reference 30

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.675031Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4213523b-0665-436e-8b71-fc76d6fd658e · outbound

This paper cites Limitations of transformers on clinical text classification.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Limitations of transformers on clinical text classification

Reference 31

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.661212Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ab046aa7-9135-4661-85be-21a142100e51 · outbound

This paper cites Deep learning–based text classification: a comprehensive review.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Deep learning–based text classification: a comprehensive review

Reference 32

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.645978Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 82b064a1-3678-435d-8bce-a55d270809c7 · outbound

This paper cites Automatic classification of cancer pathology reports: a systematic review.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Automatic classification of cancer pathology reports: a systematic review

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.632138Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 87dc8c1e-0a1b-48a1-8a70-454c76f5348c · outbound

This paper cites Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learning.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learning

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.290551Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 54005525-e7bf-490b-98d9-cafbbdef795b · outbound

This paper cites Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Control.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Control

Reference 35

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.376357Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0c0423d7-011c-4624-9968-73385b804bea · outbound

This paper cites Is attention explanation? an introduction to the debate.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Is attention explanation? an introduction to the debate

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.617537Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1a336980-8c5b-4302-afca-1a231fccc133 · outbound

This paper cites Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data

Reference 37

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.355426Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 7447d046-5b92-423b-9387-297a29defdc6 · outbound

This paper cites Towards faithful model explanation in nlp: A survey.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Towards faithful model explanation in nlp: A survey

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.603733Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e53aec60-6b9c-4360-8ac8-1fcb151c70ed · outbound

This paper cites What to learn, and how: Toward effective learning from rationales.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? What to learn, and how: Toward effective learning from rationales

Reference 39

Resolution: malformed identifier; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.590334Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.