Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Axially confined binary quantum droplets: ground states and central vortices

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Axial trapping lowers both the atom threshold for droplet formation and the rotation frequency for nucleating a central vortex in a binary quantum droplet.

desk verdict Solid, useful subfield paper: axially trapped droplet phase diagram and vortex nucleation frequency, well benchmarked but with a typo and a missing convergence check. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21805 v2 pith:KUY6N3MT submitted 2025-07-29 cond-mat.quant-gas

Srivatsa B. Prasad , Thomas P. Billam , Nick G. Parker This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords binaryquantumdropletsextendedGross-Pitaevskiiequationaxialharmonictrappingcriticalatomnumbervortexnucleationrotationfrequencyself-boundBosemixturesquasi-2D
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum droplets are self-bound liquid states of ultracold bosonic mixtures, stabilized by quantum fluctuations against collapse. This paper asks how those droplets change when a harmonic trap squeezes them along one axis, the geometry relevant to flattened, quasi-two-dimensional experiments. The central result is that stronger axial confinement monotonically lowers the critical effective atom number needed to form a droplet, and also monotonically lowers the critical rotation frequency at which a central vortex becomes energetically favorable. A variational ansatz reproduces the ground states at stronger trapping, and an analytic formula for the vortex threshold agrees well with numerical solutions of the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation. If correct, the work provides a direct route to controlling droplet formation and vortex nucleation by tuning the axial trap.

What carries the argument

The central object is the density-locked extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation (eGPE), Eq. (4), an effective single-component equation for a binary mixture whose components keep a fixed local density ratio and whose masses and trap frequencies satisfy $m_1\omega_1=m_2\omega_2$. The argument is carried by a variational super-Gaussian ansatz for the order parameter, Eq. (14), with separate radial and axial widths and exponents, which supplies the parameters used in an analytic formula for the vortex critical rotation frequency, Eqs. (45)–(46). The vortex energy is built from a logarithmic excitation energy per unit length, $\varepsilon_v^{\mathrm{LHY}}\approx \pi E^{(0)}\xi^2 \ln(1.078 D)$, whose coefficient 1.078 replaces the mean-field value 1.464 and encodes the beyond-mean-field vortex profile.

What would settle it

If an oblate binary droplet experiment sees the critical rotation frequency for vortex nucleation increase when the axial trap is tightened at fixed atom number, the central claim of monotonic decrease would be falsified; likewise, a two-component imbalanced simulation that shows $\tilde{N}_c$ rising with $\tilde{\omega}$ would break the density-locked prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, in the density-locked single-component description of a binary Bose mixture, a harmonic trap along the z-axis acts as a control knob on both the liquid-gas transition and the vortex transition. Numerically solving the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation and fitting a phase diagram shows that the critical effective atom number $\tilde{N}_c$ drops monotonically as the effective axial trapping frequency $\tilde{\omega}$ increases, while the droplet's radial width grows and its axial width is set by the trap. Embedding a unit-circulation vortex along the trap axis, the paper finds the vortex-core profile differs qualitatively from the mean-field gas vortex, and derives an analytic estimate for the critical rotation frequency $\Omega_c$ in which variational ground-state parameters enter through super-Gaussian widths. The formula predicts $\Omega_c$ decreases with both increasing $\tilde{N}$ and increasing $\tilde{\omega}$, matching the numerical values well, especially for large droplets.

Load-bearing premise

The entire analysis assumes the two components remain density-locked in the ratio $n_2/n_1=\sqrt{g_{11}/g_{22}}$ and satisfy $m_1\omega_1=m_2\omega_2$, which rules out population imbalance, unequal-component masses, and droplet-superfluid compound phases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stronger axial trapping lowers $\tilde{N}_c$, so a droplet can be formed from fewer atoms than in free space, a feature experiments can exploit by tightening the axial confinement.
  • The critical rotation frequency $\Omega_c$ decreases with both atom number and axial trap frequency, meaning central vortices should appear at slower stirring rates in oblate droplets.
  • As $\tilde{\omega}$ grows, the large-$\tilde{N}$ radial width scaling crosses from $\tilde{N}^{1/3}$ toward $\tilde{N}^{1/2}$, signaling the crossover from three-dimensional to quasi-two-dimensional droplet behavior.
  • The vortex core in the droplet is governed by the beyond-mean-field nonlinearity and has a different shape from the usual mean-field vortex, so the standard Padé approximant for the vortex profile does not transfer directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An immediate experimental probe would be to stir an oblate binary droplet at controlled rotation rates and compare the vortex onset with the predicted $\Omega_c(\tilde{N},\tilde{\omega})$; the monotonic decrease is a clear signature to look for.
  • The density-locked assumption excludes population-imbalanced mixtures, so the predicted threshold shifts may be modified in imbalanced droplets; extending the vortex calculation to imbalanced mixtures is a natural test.
  • Because the eGPE vortex has a distinct core profile, vortex–antivortex annihilation and vortex reconnection dynamics in droplets may differ from mean-field condensates, a question the stationary analysis here does not settle.
  • The analytic formula for $\Omega_c$ could be adapted to multiply-charged vortices, connecting the three-dimensional results to the better-studied two-dimensional vortex droplet thresholds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies binary quantum droplets in the density-locked single-component extended Gross-Pitaevskii formalism, subject to an axial harmonic trap. The authors solve the eGPE numerically in cylindrical coordinates with imaginary-time propagation, construct a four-parameter super-Gaussian variational ansatz, and map the droplet-gas phase diagram in the effective-atom-number versus axial-trap-frequency plane. They then compute s=1 central-vortex solutions, extract the vortex energy per unit length for a homogeneous droplet from the numerical vortex profile, and combine this with the variational ground-state profile to derive an approximate analytical formula for the critical rotation frequency Ωc. The formula is compared with numerically computed Ωc values for N in {500,1000,1500,2000} and ω in {0,0.125,0.25,0.5,1}. The central claims are that stronger axial trapping monotonically lowers the critical atom number for droplet formation and that both stronger axial trapping and larger atom numbers monotonically lower the critical rotation frequency for vortex nucleation.

Significance. If the analytical derivation is placed on sound footing, this is a useful systematic study of a less-explored regime: binary droplets in one-dimensional confinement, with a phase diagram, vortex profiles, and rotation-frequency estimates that could guide experiments in flattened geometries. The numerical work has clear strengths: the method reproduces Petrov's free-space critical atom number Nc≈18.65 to 18.66, the data are stated to be openly available, and the comparison in Fig. 8 is a genuine comparison rather than a fit of the formula to the numerical Ωc values. The central monotonicity trends are supported by the numerical data even before the analytical formula is invoked. The main weaknesses are that the analytical vortex-energy coefficient 1.078 is not independently derived or shown, the printed Eq. (31) contains an apparent internal inconsistency, and the numerical energy difference in Eq. (49) is computed with different boundary-condition treatments for s=0 and s=1 without convergence checks.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V A, Eq. (31)] As printed, the two integrals in Eq. (31) cannot be equal. The first integrand contains f^2/ρ^2, which for f→1 gives a logarithmic divergence ∼∫dρ/ρ, while the second integrand vanishes at f=1 (and also at f=0), so the second integral has no logarithmic divergence in D. Since the paper states that substituting the numerical solution of Eq. (21) into Eq. (31) yields the coefficient 1.078 in Eq. (34), the reader cannot tell which expression was actually evaluated. Please correct Eq. (31) or explicitly state the correct energy functional used to obtain Eq. (34).
  2. [Section V A, Eq. (34)] The logarithmic coefficient 1.078 is load-bearing for the analytical Ωc formula through ln(1.078 kR) in Eq. (45), but it is obtained solely by numerically inserting the model's own vortex profile into Eq. (31), with the claimed verification 'across a range of D' not shown. Unlike the mean-field coefficient 1.464, which follows from the known Ginzburg-Pitaevskii result, no independent derivation or consistency check is provided. Please include the coefficient as a function of D, describe the extrapolation procedure, and quantify how much the Ωc curves in Fig. 8 shift when the coefficient is varied within a plausible error bar.
  3. [Section V C and Appendix A, Eq. (49)] The numerical Ωc is an energy difference between s=0 and s=1 states that are obtained with different boundary-condition treatments. For s=0 the decomposition f=f0+f∞ in Eq. (A1) permits a nonzero background at the outer boundary, whereas for s=1 the first-order Hankel transform enforces f(ρ=0)=0 and the outer boundary is handled without such a decomposition. No convergence study with respect to Lρ, Lz, Nρ, or Nz is reported for the energy difference itself. Please provide grid and domain convergence checks for both states and show that the monotonic decrease in Fig. 8 is stable, especially for the smaller droplets near the self-bound regime.
  4. [Section V B, Eqs. (40)-(47)] The analytical Ωc formula depends on the replacement R(z)≈R exp[-(z/Z)^{nz}/nr] in Eq. (41) and on a small-argument expansion of the exponential integral. The paper also provides an alternative exact-numerical-integral form in Eqs. (47)-(48), but Fig. 8 is made using Eqs. (45)-(46). The error introduced by Eq. (41) is not quantified. Please compare the Ωc values obtained with Eqs. (46) and (47) against the numerical values, or otherwise show that the agreement in Fig. 8 is not an artifact of this approximation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V B, Eqs. (36) and (40)] The factor exp(nr/γ) in Eqs. (36) and (40) is inconsistent with the preceding result in Eq. (35), where the Euler-Mascheroni constant appears as -γ/nr, and with the final expressions in Eqs. (45)-(46), which use γ/nr with the correct sign. Please correct this typo throughout the derivation.
  2. [Section II B] There is a duplicated article in the phrase 'a a variational ansatz' near Eq. (14).
  3. [Section V B, Eq. (47)] The notation '2enzF(nz)' in Eq. (47) is ambiguous; it should be typeset so that the exponential factor (presumably e^{nz}) and the product F(nz) are unambiguous.
  4. [Figure 8] The figure would be easier to interpret if the numerical Ωc values included a marker of numerical uncertainty or at least the convergence data referenced in the major comments, since the claimed monotonicity is the central quantitative result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytical Ωc formula is compared against independent numerical eGPE solutions, and the 1.078 coefficient is not fitted to the Ωc data.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by direct numerical solutions of the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation, and the analytical vortex-energy derivation is not circular in the sense defined here. The phase diagram in Fig. 2 and the numerical critical rotation frequencies in Fig. 8 are obtained by solving Eq. (21) for s=0 and s=1 states and using Eq. (49), which is the standard energy-difference criterion; these numerical results do not rely on the analytical formula. The analytical formula in Eq. (45) does use the numerically determined coefficient 1.078 from Eq. (34), but that coefficient is obtained from the homogeneous, infinite-system vortex solution of the same eGPE, not from the finite-droplet Ωc values that the formula is meant to predict. The comparison in Fig. 8 is therefore a genuine out-of-sample test rather than a fitted-input-called-prediction construction. The variational ansatz of Eq. (14) is introduced and validated against the numerical ground states before being used in the derivation, and the analytical Ωc is checked against independent numerical energies. Self-citations to Refs. [14,72] appear only when stating limitations of the density-locked approximation, not as load-bearing support for the central result. The acknowledged limitations—population imbalance, unequal component masses, and inability to capture droplet-superfluid compound phases—are scope restrictions, not circularities. The derivation of Eq. (45) is approximate and contains a numerically calibrated constant, but that is a correctness/robustness concern, not a reduction of the prediction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the density-locked single-component eGPE, the super-Gaussian variational ansatz, and the use of a numerically determined vortex-energy coefficient. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • nr = variational (minimized)
    Super-Gaussian radial exponent in the ansatz Eq. (14); enters the Omega_c formula Eq. (45) and is not fixed a priori.
  • nz = variational (minimized)
    Super-Gaussian axial exponent in the ansatz Eq. (14); enters Omega_c.
  • log-coefficient 1.078 = 1.078
    Numerically extracted coefficient in the eGPE vortex energy per unit length, Eq. (34), used as input to the analytical Omega_c formula.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The binary mixture is density-locked and described by the single-component eGPE, Eq. (4), with component populations and trap frequencies locked (n2/n1 = sqrt(g11/g22), m1 omega1 = m2 omega2).
    Reduces the two-component problem to Eq. (4); the paper acknowledges in the conclusion that this neglects imbalances and unequal masses.
  • ad hoc to paper The variational ansatz Eq. (14) (super-Gaussian with independent widths and exponents) captures the vortex-free ground state accurately enough for the Omega_c estimate.
    Ansatz is chosen ad hoc; its accuracy is tested against numerics only for selected parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper The analytical vortex energy derivation assumes Z >> xi and uses the approximate R(z) of Eq. (41) and small-x expansions of the exponential integral.
    These approximations enter Eqs. (35)-(45) and are not rigorously justified; they are checked only indirectly via Fig. 8.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Axially confined binary quantum droplets: ground states and central vortices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KUY6N3MT

@misc{pith2026250721805,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Axially confined binary quantum droplets: ground states and central vortices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KUY6N3MT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21805}
}
read the original abstract

Ultracold miscible mixtures of bosonic gases have been observed to form quantum droplet states stabilized by beyond-mean-field quantum fluctuations. Here we study the properties of the droplets when subjected to harmonic trapping in one dimension, using a combination of numerical, variational and analytical approaches. We map out the phase diagram between bound droplets and the unbound gas state and the form of the ground states. We additionally consider how the droplet solutions are modified by the presence of a central vortex and use these results to estimate the critical rotation frequency for vortices to be energetically favored. Our work helps to understand the physics of self-bound droplets and vortex droplets in flattened geometries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21805 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagram of an axially trapped binary mixture in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Ground state solutions of the eGPE when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The peak densities of the numerically determined ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Radial ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Solutions of the eGPE for a vortex droplet with ˜ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparisons of the numerical solutions of the mean-field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: reveals a number of properties exhibited by Ωc. Firstly, as the effective atom number Ñ increases, the critical rotation frequency Ωc decreases. This is in agreement with an analogous calculation to those in Secs. V A and V B that was carried out for a purely two-dime…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [56]

    M. N. Tengstrand, P. Stürmer, E. Ö. Karabulut, and S. M. Reimann, Rotating Binary Bose-Einstein Condensates and V or- tex Clusters in Quantum Droplets, Physical Review Letters123, 160405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    In (b), the numerically determined contours such that n(r) = 0.1n0 are plotted for ρ ≥ 0, z ≥ 0, as well as the corresponding variationally determined contour

    are plotted as a function of ρ. In (b), the numerically determined contours such that n(r) = 0.1n0 are plotted for ρ ≥ 0, z ≥ 0, as well as the corresponding variationally determined contour. in a previous theoretical investigation of axially trapped bi- nary mixtures that employed density functional theory instead of Eq. (4) [56]. We also note that Petro...

    work page 2000

  3. [2]

    D. S. Petrov, Quantum Mechanical Stabilization of a Collaps- ing Bose-Bose Mixture, Physical Review Letters 115, 155302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Eigenvalues and Eigen- functions of a Bose System of Hard Spheres and Its Low- Temperature Properties, Physical Review106, 1135 (1957)

    work page 1957

  5. [4]

    N. M. Hugenholtz and D. Pines, Ground-State Energy and Ex- citation Spectrum of a System of Interacting Bosons, Physical Review 116, 489 (1959)

    work page 1959

  6. [5]

    Ferrier-Barbut, H

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, and T. Pfau, Observation of Quantum Droplets in a Strongly Dipolar Bose Gas, Physical Review Letters 116, 215301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. San- tos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-Fluctuation-Driven Crossover from a Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Macrodroplet in a Dipolar Quantum Fluid, Physical Review X 6, 041039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-Bound Droplets of a Dilute Magnetic Quantum Liquid, Nature 539, 259 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    Baillie, R

    D. Baillie, R. M. Wilson, R. N. Bisset, and P. B. Blakie, Self- Bound Dipolar Droplet: A Localized Matter Wave in Free Space, Physical Review A 94, 021602(R) (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    R. N. Bisset, R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Dipolar Condensate with Quantum Fluctuations, Physical Review A 94, 033619 (2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    Wächtler and L

    F. Wächtler and L. Santos, Ground-State Properties and El- ementary Excitations of Quantum Droplets in Dipolar Bose- Einstein Condensates, Physical Review A 94, 043618 (2016)

    2016

  4. [11]

    C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Quantum Liquid Droplets in a Mix- ture of Bose-Einstein Condensates, Science 359, 301 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Cheiney, C

    P. Cheiney, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, and L. Tarruell, Bright Soliton to Quantum Droplet Transition in a Mixture of Bose-Einstein Condensates, Physical Review Let- ters 120, 135301 (2018)

    2018

  6. [13]

    Semeghini, G

    G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wol- swijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and M. Fattori, Self-Bound Quantum Droplets of Atomic Mixtures in Free Space, Physical Review Letters 120, 235301 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    M. N. Tengstrand and S. M. Reimann, Droplet-Superfluid Com- pounds in Binary Bosonic Mixtures, Physical Review A 105, 033319 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    T. A. Flynn, L. Parisi, T. P. Billam, and N. G. Parker, Quantum Droplets in Imbalanced Atomic Mixtures, Physical Review Re- search 5, 033167 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Chergui, J

    L. Chergui, J. Bengtsson, J. Bjerlin, P. Stürmer, G. M. Kavoulakis, and S. M. Reimann, Superfluid-droplet crossover in a binary boson mixture on a ring: Exact diagonalization so- lutions for few-particle systems in one dimension, Physical Re- view A 108, 023313 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    I. A. Englezos, P. Schmelcher, and S. I. Mistakidis, Particle- Imbalanced Weakly Interacting Quantum Droplets in One Di- mension, Physical Review A 110, 023324 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    J. C. Pelayo, G. A. Bougas, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and S. I. Mis- takidis, Droplet-Gas Phases and their Dynamical Formation in Particle Imbalanced Mixtures (2025), arXiv:2506.09314 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2025

  12. [19]

    N. B. Jørgensen, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Dilute Fluid Gov- erned by Quantum Fluctuations, Physical Review Letters 121, 173403 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    T. G. Skov, M. G. Skou, N. B. Jørgensen, and J. J. Arlt, Ob- servation of a Lee-Huang-Yang Fluid, Physical Review Letters 126, 230404 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Ancilotto, M

    F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, M. Guilleumas, and M. Pi, Self- Bound Ultradilute Bose Mixtures Within Local Density Ap- proximation, Physical Review A 98, 053623 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Minardi, F

    F. Minardi, F. Ancilotto, A. Burchianti, C. D’Errico, C. Fort, and M. Modugno, Effective Expression of the Lee-Huang-Yang Energy Functional for Heteronuclear Mixtures, Physical Re- view A 100, 063636 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    D’Errico, A

    C. D’Errico, A. Burchianti, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. An- cilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and C. Fort, Observation of Quantum Droplets in a Heteronuclear Bosonic Mixture, Physi- cal Review Research 1, 033155 (2019)

    2019

  17. [24]

    Z. Guo, F. Jia, L. Li, Y . Ma, J. M. Hutson, X. Cui, and D. Wang, Lee-Huang-Yang Effects in the Ultracold Mixture of 23Na and 87Rb with Attractive Interspecies Interactions, Physical Review Research 3, 033247 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    Fort and M

    C. Fort and M. Modugno, Self-Evaporation Dynamics of Quan- tum Droplets in a 41K-87Rb Mixture, Applied Science 11, 866 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    Cappellaro, T

    A. Cappellaro, T. Macri, and L. Salasnich, Collective Modes Across the Soliton-Droplet Crossover in Binary Bose Mixtures, Physical Review A 97, 053623 (2018)

    2018

  20. [27]

    Cikojevi´c, L

    V . Cikojevi´c, L. V . Marki´c, M. Pi, M. Barranco, and J. Boronat, Towards a Quantum Monte Carlo–Based Density Functional In- cluding Finite-Range Effects: Excitation Modes of a 39K Quan- tum Droplet, Physical Review A 102, 033335 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Hu and X.-J

    H. Hu and X.-J. Liu, Collective Excitations of a Spherical Ul- tradilute Quantum Droplet, Physical Review A 102, 053303 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    S. I. Mistakidis and E. G. Charalampidis, Two-component droplet phases and their spectral stability in one dimension, Physical Review A 111, 013318 (2025)

    2025

  23. [30]

    Y . V . Kartashov, B. A. Malomed, L. Tarruell, and L. Torner, Three-Dimensional Droplets of Swirling Superfluids, Physical Review A 98, 013612 (2018)

    2018

  24. [31]

    Cidrim, F

    A. Cidrim, F. E. A. dos Santos, E. A. L. Henn, and T. Macri, V ortices in Self-Bound Dipolar Droplets, Physical Review A 98, 023618 (2018)

    2018

  25. [32]

    Dong and Y

    L. Dong and Y . V . Kartashov, Rotating Multidimensional Quan- tum Droplets, Physical Review Letters 126, 244101 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    T. A. Yogurt, U. Tanyeri, A. Keles, and M. Ö. Oktel, V ortex Lat- tices in Strongly Confined Quantum Droplets, Physical Review A 108, 033315 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Edmonds, Dark quantum droplets and solitary waves in beyond-mean-field bose-einstein condensate mixtures, Physical Review Research 5, 023175 (2023)

    M. Edmonds, Dark quantum droplets and solitary waves in beyond-mean-field bose-einstein condensate mixtures, Physical Review Research 5, 023175 (2023)

    2023

  28. [35]

    Nikolaou, G

    S. Nikolaou, G. M. Kavoulakis, and M. Ögren, Rapidly Rotat- ing Quantum Droplets Confined in a Harmonic Potential, Phys- ical Review A 110, 043302 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    L. Dong, M. Fan, and B. A. Malomed, Three-dimensional vor- tex and multipole quantum droplets in a toroidal potential, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 188, 115499 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    D. Liu, Y . Gao, D. Fan, B. Malomed, and L. Zhang, Rotating dipole and quadrupole quantum droplets in binary bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review Research 6, 033186 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    S. K. Jha, M. K. Verma, S. I. Mistakidis, and P. K. Mishra, En- ergy spectra and fluxes of two-dimensional turbulent quantum droplets, Physical Review Fluids 10, 064618 (2025)

    2025

  32. [39]

    Edmonds, T

    M. Edmonds, T. Bland, and N. Parker, Quantum droplets of quasi-one-dimensional dipolar bose–einstein condensates, 12 Journal of Physics Communications 4, 125008 (2020)

    2020

  33. [40]

    Ferioli, G

    G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, S. Terradas-Briansó, L. Masi, M. Fat- tori, and M. Modugno, Dynamical Formation of Quantum Droplets in a 39K Mixture, Physical Review Research2, 013269 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    J. E. Alba-Arroyo, S. F. Caballero-Benitez, and R. Jáuregui, Weber Number and the Outcome of Binary Collisions Between Quantum Droplets, Scientific Reports 12, 18467 (2022)

    2022

  35. [42]

    Cavicchioli, C

    L. Cavicchioli, C. Fort, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and A. Burchianti, Dynamical Formation of Multiple Quantum Droplets in a Bose-Bose Mixture, Physical Review Letter 134, 093401 (2025)

    2025

  36. [43]

    I. G. Moss, Dark matter droplets (2025), arXiv:2407.13243 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [44]

    L. He, H. Li, W. Yi, and Z.-Q. Yu, Quantum Criticality of Liquid-Gas Transition in a Binary Bose Mixture, Physical Re- view Letters 130, 193001 (2023)

    2023

  38. [45]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of Bose–Einstein Con- densation of Dipolar Molecules, Nature 631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Karman, I. Steven- son, and S. Will, Observation of Self-Bound Droplets of Ul- tracold Dipolar Molecules (2025), arXiv:2507.15208 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2025

  40. [47]

    Schmidt, L

    M. Schmidt, L. Lassabi‘ere, G. Qu’emen’er, and T. Lan- gen, Self-Bound Dipolar Droplets and Supersolids in Molec- ular Bose-Einstein Condensates, Physical Review Research 4, 013235 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. S’anchez-Baena, R. Bombín, T. Kar- man, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar Droplets of Strongly Interacting Molecules, Physical Review Letters 134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  42. [49]

    W.-J. Jin, F. Deng, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Bose-Einstein Condensates of Microwave-Shielded Polar Molecules, Physical Review Let- ters 134, 223003 (2025)

    2025

  43. [50]

    D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakarchik, Ultradilute Low- Dimensional Liquids, Physical Review Letters 117, 155302 (2016)

    2016

  44. [51]

    P. Zin, M. Pylak, T. Wasak, M. Gajda, and Z. Idziaszek, Quan- tum Bose-Bose Droplets at a Dimensional Crossover, Physical Review A 98, 051603(R) (2018)

    2018

  45. [52]

    T. Ilg, J. Kumlin, L. Santos, D. S. Petrov, and H. P. Büchler, Dimensional Crossover for the Beyond-Mean-Field Correction in Bose Gases, Physical Review A 98, 051604(R) (2018)

    2018

  46. [53]

    P. Zin, M. Pylak, and M. Gajda, Self-Consistent Description of Bose-Bose Droplets: Harmonically Trapped Quasi-Two- Dimensional Droplets, Physical Review A106, 013320 (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    J. C. Pelayo, G. Bougas, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and S. I. Mis- takidis, Phases and Dynamics of Quantum Droplets in the Crossover to Two-Dimensions, SciPost Physics18, 129 (2025)

    2025

  48. [55]

    Y . Li, Z. Chen, Z. Luo, C. Huang, H. Tan, and W. P. B. A. Malomed, Two-Dimensional V ortex Quantum Droplets, Physi- cal Review A 98, 063602 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Sanuy, R

    A. Sanuy, R. Barac, P. Stipanovi´c, L. V . Marki´c, and J. Boronat, Squeezing Bose-Bose Liquid Drops, Physical Review A 109, 013313 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Bezett, V

    A. Bezett, V . Bychkov, E. Lundh, D. Kobyakov, and M. Mark- lund, Magnetic Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability in a Two- Component Bose-Einstein Condensate, Physical Review A 82, 043608 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Ho and V

    T.-L. Ho and V . B. Shenoy, Binary Mixtures of Bose Con- densates of Alkali Atoms, Physical Review Letters 77, 3276 (1996)

    1996

  52. [60]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Di- lute Gases, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    2008

  53. [61]

    Timmermans, Phase Separation of Bose-Einstein Conden- sates, Physical Review Letters 81, 5718 (1998)

    E. Timmermans, Phase Separation of Bose-Einstein Conden- sates, Physical Review Letters 81, 5718 (1998)

    1998

  54. [62]

    By inspection, ̵h/τ= ̵h2/Mξ2 = Mξ2/τ2

  55. [63]

    C. F. Barenghi and N. G. Parker, A Primer on Quantum Fluids , Springer Briefs in Physics (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    S. R. Otajonov, Quantum Droplets in Three-Dimensional Bose–Einstein Condensates for Di fferent Trapping Frequen- cies, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 55, 085001 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Stürmer, M

    P. Stürmer, M. N. Tengstrand, R. Sachdeva, and S. M. Reimann, Breathing Mode in Two-Dimensional Binary Self-Bound Bose- Gas Droplets, Physical Review A 102, 053302 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Examilioti and G

    P. Examilioti and G. M. Kavoulakis, Ground State and Ro- tational Properties of Two-Dimensional Self-Bound Quantum Droplets, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53, 175301 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Dong and M

    L. Dong and M. Fan, Stable Higher-Charge V ortex Droplets Governed by Quantum Fluctuations in Three Dimensions, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 173, 113728 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Dalfovo and S

    F. Dalfovo and S. Stringari, Bosons in Anisotropic Traps: Ground State and V ortices, Physical Review A53, 2477 (1996)

    1996

  61. [69]

    Lundh, C

    E. Lundh, C. J. Pethick, and H. Smith, Zero-Temperature Prop- erties of a Trapped Bose-Condensed Gas: Beyond the Thomas- Fermi Approximation, Physical Review A 55, 2126 (1997)

    1997

  62. [70]

    V . L. Ginzburg and L. P. Pitaevskii, On the Theory of Super- fluidity, Zhurnal Éksperimental’no˘ı i Teoretichesko˘ı Fiziki 34, 1240 (1958)

    1958

  63. [71]

    K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dalibard, V or- tex Formation in a Stirred Bose-Einstein Condensate, Physical Review Letters 84, 806 (2000)

    2000

  64. [72]

    T. A. Davydova and A. I. Yakimenko, Stable Multicharged Lo- calized Optical V ortices in Cubic–Quintic Nonlinear Media, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 6, S197 (2004)

    2004

  65. [73]

    T. A. Flynn, N. A. Keepfer, N. G. Parker, and T. P. Billam, Harmonically Trapped Imbalanced Quantum Droplets, Physi- cal Review Research 6, 013209 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    S. R. Otajonov, E. N. Tsoy, and F. K. Abdullaev, Variational Ap- proximation for Two-Dimensional Quantum Droplets, Physical Review E 102, 062217 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    N. G. Berlo ff, Padé Approximations of Solitary Wave Solutions of the Gross–Pitaevskii Equation, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical 37, 1617–1632 (2004)

    2004

  68. [76]

    Badariprasad, T

    S. Badariprasad, T. Billam, and N. Parker, Axially confined binary quantum droplets: ground states and central vortices (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    Britanak, P

    V . Britanak, P. C. Yip, and K. R. Rao,Discrete Cosine and Sine Transforms: General Properties, Fast Algorithms and Integer Approximations, 1st ed. (Academic Press, 2007)

    2007

  70. [78]

    A.-C. Lee, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Numerical Calcula- tion of Dipolar-Quantum-Droplet Stationary States, Physical Review Research 3, 013283 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    Guizar-Sicairos and J

    M. Guizar-Sicairos and J. C. Gutiérrez-Vega, Computation of Quasi-Discrete Hankel Transforms of Integer Order for Prop- agating Optical Wave Fields, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 21, 53 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.