Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 84 references

Density-functional theory study of the interaction between NV$^{-}$ centers and native defects in diamond

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Single carbon interstitials and vacancies measurably perturb nearby NV$^-$ optical spectra over hundreds of nanometers, and a small NV$^-$ cluster can identify the defect and its charge state.

desk verdict Solid long-range detection radii from standard continuum extrapolation; the multi-NV discrimination claims need a resolved E-symmetry susceptibility discrepancy before they can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22683 v1 pith:RPNTMJYR submitted 2025-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Gabriel I. López-Morales , Joanna M. Zajac , Tom Delord , Carlos A. Meriles , Cyrus E. Dreyer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nitrogen-vacancycenterdiamondnativedefectscarboninterstitialvacancystrainsensingelectricfieldquantumembeddingdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how far a single native defect in diamond—a carbon interstitial ($C_i$) or a missing carbon atom ($V_C$)—can perturb the optical spectrum of a nearby negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy center (NV$^-$). Using density-functional theory to compute each defect's strain and charge distribution, and quantum-embedding susceptibilities to convert those fields into NV$^-$ excited-state shifts, the authors argue that strain from one such defect remains optically measurable out to roughly 200 nm, while the electric field of a charged defect is measurable out to about a micron. They further show that a small cluster of NV$^-$ centers, read out simultaneously, can in principle identify which native defect is present and what charge state it carries. If correct, this turns the NV$^-$'s well-known environmental sensitivity into a tool for non-destructive, single-defect materials characterization in diamond.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three coupled ingredients. DFT supercells give each defect's elastic dipole tensor $P_{jk}$ and its macroscopic excess charge density $\rho_D$; the elastic dipole enters the isotropic elastic Green's function, producing a strain that decays as $1/r^3$, while $\rho_D$ feeds a multipole expansion whose leading terms are the monopole $Q_D$ and dipole $p_D$ of the defect's electric field. Previously computed quantum-embedding susceptibilities translate those external fields into the NV$^-$ excited-state Hamiltonian: longitudinal and transverse strain coefficients ($\chi_{A_1}$, $\chi_{A_1'}$, $\chi_E$, $\chi_{E'}$) plus parallel and perpendicular electric-dipole moments ($d_\parallel = 1.63$ D, $d_\perp = 2.16$ D). A multi-NV model then randomly places about 12.5 NV/µm$^3$ centers with random orientations around the defect, adds a background strain, includes NV–NV interactions, and generates the spectral and polarization maps from which defect identification is read.

What would settle it

Place a single NV$^-$ at a known distance from an individual carbon interstitial or vacancy created by implantation or electron irradiation, measure the optical shift and the $3E_x$/$3E_y$ splitting as a function of separation, and compare the range and angular dependence with the predicted 200 nm strain cutoff and the roughly 1 µm charged-defect electric-field cutoff; a mismatch beyond the stated linewidth-limited uncertainty would falsify the continuum extrapolation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that isolated carbon interstitials and vacancies leave measurable fingerprints on nearby NV$^-$ centers at distances relevant to experiments. Under ideal measuring conditions, the strain field of a single defect perturbs the NV$^-$ optical transition out to roughly 200 nm for $C_i$ and 150 nm for $V_C$, whereas the electric field of a charged defect shifts the transition out to 0.2–1.4 µm, with neutral defects detectable only over shorter ranges of tens to about 180 nm. Because the multipole field of a charged defect is dominated by its monopole, two defects of the same charge produce nearly identical electric fingerprints at long range; the anisotropic strain field, which reflects the defect's elastic dipole, is what separates them. The paper then demonstrates that measuring several randomly oriented NV$^-$ centers around a single defect—including shifts, splittings, and the orientation of the $3E_x \leftrightarrow 3E_y$ transition dipole—can locate the defect and determine both its identity and its charge state.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative reach of the strain-based predictions rests on the computed transverse (E-symmetry) strain susceptibilities of the NV$^-$ excited states being physically correct; those values are one to two orders of magnitude larger than previous experimental estimates, and the paper attributes the gap to a basis choice rather than validating it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single NV$^-$ center, under optical linewidths of 1–70 MHz, should see the strain of one carbon interstitial or vacancy from up to roughly 200 nm away.
  • The charge state of a native defect is readable from the sign, range, and $1/r^2$ scaling of its electric-field shift, while the defect's identity is readable from the anisotropy of its strain field.
  • Two to five simultaneously measured NV$^-$ centers suffice to localize a native defect and distinguish, for example, $C_i^+$, $C_i^0$, $C_i^-$, and $V_C^-$.
  • Polarization maps of the $3E_x \leftrightarrow 3E_y$ transition provide a way to tell apart defects with the same charge, which pure electric-field measurements cannot do.
  • The same DFT-plus-continuum pipeline extends naturally to other color-center hosts such as silicon carbide or boron nitride.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distinct range scalings of strain ($1/r^3$) and monopole electric field ($1/r^2$) suggest a concentration-independent charge-state classifier: taking the ratio of measured NV$^-$ shifts at two separations would isolate the multipole order of the field.
  • At the predicted ranges, NV$^-$ ensembles could map radiation damage or implantation profiles in diamond at the level of individual intrinsic defects, not just statistical averages.
  • A direct experimental route to test the model is to measure the predicted polarization orientation of the strain-split $3E_x \leftrightarrow 3E_y$ transition near a known defect; the paper's maps make a specific, checkable prediction for each defect type and charge state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper combines DFT supercell calculations of native defects in diamond (carbon interstitials and vacancies) with quantum-embedding susceptibility parameters for the NV- center, and uses continuum elastic and electrostatic models to extrapolate the strain and electric-field perturbations to micrometer length scales. The authors predict that a single NV- can detect the electric field of charged native defects up to about 1 micrometer away, that neutral defects are detectable to shorter ranges, and that strain fields from individual defects produce measurable optical shifts up to about 200 nm. They further simulate multi-NV- clusters and argue that 2-5 NV centers can determine the nature and charge state of a nearby native defect through spectral shifts, splittings, and polarization-dependent transition-dipole measurements.

Significance. If the predictions hold, this provides a useful quantitative framework for NV-based characterization of intrinsic defects in diamond, with explicit falsifiable detection ranges and multi-NV measurement protocols. The paper's strengths include systematic supercell-size convergence checks (512-1728 atoms), validation of the elastic-dipole continuum model against the DFT strain data, and an explicit treatment of charged and neutral defect electrostatics via multipole expansions. The central quantitative claims, however, rest on previously computed susceptibility parameters and on an assumed detection linewidth threshold, and the transverse E-symmetry strain susceptibilities disagree with experiment by one to two orders of magnitude. Because the multi-NV defect-characterization conclusions use those transverse coefficients, the manuscript requires additional validation before the full set of claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eqs. (6)-(7)] The transverse E-symmetry strain susceptibilities reported here (χ_E = 33.11 eV and χ_E' = -91.88 eV) are one to two orders of magnitude larger than the experimental values from Ref. 8, and the paper attributes this to a different definition of the 3Ex/3Ey basis 'with no avoided crossing at zero strain.' A basis rotation can redistribute matrix elements between Δ and κ, but it leaves the physical eigenvalue splitting invariant for a given strain; therefore the discrepancy cannot be dismissed without showing the explicit transformation or comparing a strain-induced physical observable (e.g., the 3E splitting under known stress) to experiment. Because Sec. III C and Figs. 7-8 use these coefficients for the 3Ex/3Ey splittings and for the transition-dipole orientations μxy ∝ ε(r) × NVz, the multi-NV defect-characterization claim is not supported unless this issue is resolved. This concern does not invalidate the 200-nm strain-range claim, which relies mainly on χ_A1, but it does undermine the like-charge discrimination results.
  2. [Sec. III A, Fig. 3 and accompanying text] The detection radii (180 nm to 1.4 µm for charged defects, 10-180 nm for neutral ones) are quoted as single ranges, but they are derived by comparing energy shifts with an assumed linewidth threshold that the authors vary from 1 to 70 MHz. The abstract's 'within a micron' and '200 nm' statements therefore conflate a material property with a measurement-protocol parameter. Please report detection radius as a function of the linewidth threshold, state the threshold used for each headline number, and propagate uncertainties from the input susceptibilities and dipole moments; otherwise the quantitative central claim is not reproducible from the paper as written.
  3. [Sec. III C and Figs. 7-8] The demonstration that 2-5 NV centers can determine the nature and charge state of a native defect assumes that the local strain fully fixes the orientation of μxy and that the NV retains Cs symmetry under the perturbation; the text itself notes this is an upper bound 'only achieved if ε(r) is in a high enough symmetry direction so that the resulting symmetry of the NV- after perturbation is Cs.' The manuscript should test how robust the multi-NV discrimination is when this condition is relaxed, for example under arbitrary low-symmetry strain or with a different choice of background strain, because the polarization maps in Figs. 8(d-f) are the main evidence for distinguishing like-charge defects such as C_i^- and V_C^-.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II D and references] Reference 76 is cited for PAW pseudopotentials, but the reference list gives 'Generalized gradient approximation made simple' under [76] (which is the PBE paper, Ref. 77); please correct the citation to Blöchl's projector augmented-wave method paper and adjust the reference list accordingly.
  2. [Sec. IV versus Sec. II C] The NV concentration is stated as 12.5 NV/µm³ in Sec. II C and as 2.5 NV/µm² in Sec. IV; please reconcile the volumetric and areal densities and define the relevant excitation volume consistently.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos, including 'linewdith' (Sec. III A), 'was can analyze' (Sec. III B), and 'vial' (Introduction); please proofread the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Forward-model computation with independently obtained inputs; no circular reduction found.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward model rather than a self-referential loop. Native-defect elastic dipoles and excess charge densities are computed from DFT supercells, extrapolated to long range with continuum elasticity and multipole electrostatics, and then converted into NV optical shifts using strain and electric-field susceptibilities taken from prior quantum embedding work (Refs. 45 and 72). The detection radii are outputs of this chain: they are obtained by comparing the computed shifts with stated linewidth thresholds. None of the predicted detection radii, multi-NV spectral patterns, or characterization conclusions are used to tune any of the input susceptibilities, dipoles, or charge densities. The [101] susceptibility fit performed in this paper is a fit to quantum-embedding total-energy data, not to the experimental quantities being predicted. The self-citations to the authors' prior quantum embedding work are load-bearing but independent: they supply parameters and selection rules from a separate first-principles computation, and they are not defined in terms of the present paper's target defect-detection claims. The noted disagreement of the E-symmetry strain susceptibilities with experimental values is a validation and correctness concern, but it is not circularity, because the paper does not fit those coefficients to the disputed experiments and then claim the resulting splittings as an independent prediction. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim rests on standard elastic and electrostatic models, but the quantitative predictions depend on fitted susceptibility coefficients and on the assumed detection linewidth, both of which are the main sources of uncertainty.

free parameters (3)
  • Strain susceptibility coefficients chi_A1, chi_A'1, chi_E, chi_E' (and quadratic terms) = 6.48, -7.67, 33.11, -91.88 eV (linear); -40.24, 17.07, -82.80, 66.12 eV (quadratic)
    Fitted to quantum embedding calculations on strained NV- supercells (Sec. II A); used to convert defect strain into NV- spectral shifts. The E coefficients are 1-2 orders larger than experimental values.
  • NV- electric dipole moments d_parallel and d_perp = 1.63 D and 2.16 D
    Taken from prior quantum embedding work (Ref. 45) and companion work (Ref. 72); used to convert defect electric fields into shifts. Not independently benchmarked here.
  • Detection linewidth threshold = 1-70 MHz
    Chosen as the resolvable spectral-shift threshold; directly sets the detection radii. The abstract's 'within a micron' corresponds to the optimistic low end of this range.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Isotropic elasticity with Lame parameters lambda = 487.2 GPa and mu = 117.53 GPa describes the long-range strain field of point defects in diamond
    Used in Eqs. (1)-(2); diamond is cubic and not perfectly isotropic, but the authors compare with DFT strain and find the model gives a reasonable upper bound (Sec. III B).
  • domain assumption The NV- strain and electric-field susceptibilities from quantum embedding, in the linear regime, apply at the weak fields at 10-1000 nm distances
    Assumed in Sec. II A and II B; the authors state the relevant strains are in the linear regime, but quadratic terms were needed to fit the large-strain QE data.
  • domain assumption Defect charge density from DFT supercell subtraction, macroscopically averaged, yields the correct long-range electrostatic field when expanded as monopole plus dipole
    Sec. II B; convergence checked to below 12% between 5x5x5 and 6x6x6 cells, but the Gaussian charge insertion and origin choice for the dipole are ad hoc.
  • domain assumption Static isolated defect; no charge-state dynamics, spin noise, or spectral diffusion beyond a static linewidth
    The paper explicitly sets aside dynamic effects in Sec. I and uses a static linewidth as the resolution limit.
  • domain assumption The multi-NV signal is a linear superposition of single-defect fields
    Stated in Sec. III C; the authors expect the realistic multiple-defect case to be a linear superposition of strain and electric fields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Density-functional theory study of the interaction between NV$^{-}$ centers and native defects in diamond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPNTMJYR

@misc{pith2026250722683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Density-functional theory study of the interaction between NV$^-$ centers and native defects in diamond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPNTMJYR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22683}
}
abstract

The NV$^{-}$ color center in diamond has been demonstrated as a nanoscale sensor for quantum metrology. However, the properties that make it ideal for measuring, e.g., minute electric and magnetic fields also make it sensitive to imperfections in the diamond host. In this work, we quantify the impact of nearby native defects on the many-body states of NV$^{-}$. We combine previous quantum embedding results of strain and electric-field susceptibilities of NV$^{-}$ with density-functional theory calculations on native defects. The latter are used to parametrize continuum models in order to extrapolate the effects of native defects up to the micrometer scale. We show that under ideal measuring conditions, the optical properties of NV$^{-}$ are measurably affected by the strain caused by single carbon interstitials and vacancies up to 200 nm away; in contrast, the NV$^{-}$ is measurably affected by the electric field of such charged (neutral) native defects within a micron (100 nm). Finally, we show how measuring multiple individual NV$^{-}$ centers in the vicinity of a native defect can be used to determine the nature of the defect and its charge state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22683 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Defect charge densities for intrinsic defects in diamond. (a, b) Excess defect charge densities for the C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Near-field electric-field-induced effects on the NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Defect-induced strain and displacement fields in diamond from individual C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Elastic dipole model representation of defect-induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Extrapolated spectral shifts on the NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectral response of an NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Local effects on the optical excited states of a random NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tamarat, T

    P. Tamarat, T. Gaebel, J. R. Rabeau, M. Khan, A. D. Greentree, H. Wilson, L. C. L. Hollenberg, S. Prawer, P. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Stark shift control of single optical centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083002 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Dolde, H

    F. Dolde, H. Fedder, M. W. Doherty, T. N¨ obauer, F. Rempp, G. Balasubramanian, T. Wolf, F. Reinhard, L. C. L. Hollenberg, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins, Nat. Phys. 7, 459 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    L. C. Bassett, F. J. Heremans, C. G. Yale, B. B. Buck- ley, and D. D. Awschalom, Electrical tuning of single nitrogen-vacancy center optical transitions enhanced by photoinduced fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 266403 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Olivero, F

    P. Olivero, F. Bosia, B. A. Fairchild, B. C. Gibson, A. D. Greentree, P. Spizzirri, and S. Prawer, Splitting of pho- toluminescent emission from nitrogen–vacancy centers in diamond induced by ion-damage-induced stress, New J. Phys. 15 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Schirhagl, K

    R. Schirhagl, K. Chang, M. Loretz, and C. L. Degen, Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: Nanoscale sensors for physics and biology, Nano Lett. 65, 83 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Balasubramanian, A

    G. Balasubramanian, A. Lazariev, S. R. Arumugam, and D. wen Duan, Nitrogen-vacancy color center in di- amond - emerging nanoscale applications in bioimaging and biosensing, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology20, 69 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    M. E. Trusheim and D. Englund, Wide-field strain imag- ing with preferentially aligned nitrogen-vacancy centers in polycrystalline, New J. Phys. 18 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    K. W. Lee, D. Lee, P. Ovartchaiyapong, J. Minguzzi, J. R. Maze, and A. C. B. Jayich, Strain coupling of a mechanical resonator to a single quantum emitter in di- amond, Phys. Rev. Applied 6 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Mittiga, S

    T. Mittiga, S. Hsieh, C. Zu, B. Kobrin, F. Machado, P. Bhattacharyya, N. Z. Rui, A. Jarmola, S. Choi, D. Budker, and N. Y. Yao, Imaging the local charge en- vironment of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 246402 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Kehayias, M

    P. Kehayias, M. J. Turner, R. Trubko, J. M. Schloss, C. A. Hart, M. Wesson, D. R. Glenn, and R. L. Walsworth, Imaging crystal stress in diamond using en- sembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. B 100, 174103 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Zhang, G

    T. Zhang, G. Pramanik, K. Zhang, M. Gulka, L. Wang, J. Jing, F. Xu, Z. Li, Q. Wei, P. Cigler, and Z. Chu, Toward quantitative bio-sensing with nitrogen–vacancy center in diamond, Nat. Commun. 6, 2077–2107 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    K. Bian, W. Zheng, X. Zeng, X. Chen, R. St¨ ohr, A. Denisenko, S. Yang, J. Wrachtrup, and Y. Jiang, Nanoscale electric-field imaging based on a quantum sen- sor and its charge-state control under ambient condition, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    B. A. McCullian, H. F. H. Cheung, H. Y. Chen, and G. D. Fuchs, Quantifying the spectral diffusion of N−V centers by symmetry, Phys. Rev. Applied 18 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    W. Ji, Z. Liu, Y. Guo, Z. Hu, J. Zhou, S. Dai, Y. Chen, P. Yu, M. Wang, K. Xia, F. Shi, Y. Wang, and J. Du, Correlated sensing with a solid-state quantum multisen- sor system for atomic-scale structural analysis, Nat. Pho- ton. 18, 230–235 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Delord, R

    T. Delord, R. Monge, and C. A. Meriles, Correlated spec- troscopy of electric noise with color center clusters, Nano Lett. (in press) (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond: the electronic solution, New J. Phys. 13 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    N. B. Manson, M. Hedges, M. S. J. Barson, R. Ahlefeldt, M. W. Doherty, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, and M. J. Sellars, N V−-N + pair centre in 1b diamond, New J. Phys. 20, 113037 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Achard, V

    J. Achard, V. Jacques, and A. Tallaire, Chemical vapour deposition diamond single crystals with nitrogen-vacancy centres: a review of material synthesis and technology for quantum sensing applications, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53, 313001 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    M. N. R. Ashfold, J. P. Goss, B. L. Green, P. W. May, M. E. Newton, and C. V. Peaker, Nitrogen in diamond, Chem. Rev. 120, 5745–5794 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity optimization for nv-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Gatto Monticone, F

    D. Gatto Monticone, F. Quercioli, R. Mercatelli, S. So- ria, S. Borini, T. Poli, M. Vannoni, E. Vittone, and P. Olivero, Systematic study of defect-related quench- ing of nv luminescence in diamond with time-correlated single-photon counting spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 88, 1552...

    2013

  14. [22]

    L¨ uhmann, N

    T. L¨ uhmann, N. Raatz, R. John, M. Lesik, J. R¨ odiger, M. Portail, D. Wildanger, F. Kleißler, K. Nordlund, A. Zaitsev, J.-F. Roch, A. Tallaire, J. Meijer, and S. Pez- zagna, Screening and engineering of colour centres in dia- mond, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51, 4...

    2018

  15. [23]

    Z. Yuan, M. Fitzpatrick, L. V. H. Rodgers, S. Sangtawesin, S. Srinivasan, and N. P. de Leon, Charge state dynamics and optically detected electron spin resonance contrast of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033263 (2020). 14

    2020

  16. [24]

    B. L. Dwyer, L. V. Rodgers, E. K. Urbach, D. Bluvstein, S. Sangtawesin, H. Zhou, Y. Nassab, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Yuan, K. De Greve, E. L. Peterson, H. Knowles, T. Sumarac, J.-P. Chou, A. Gali, V. Dobrovitski, M. D. Lukin, and N. P. de Leon, Probing spin dynamics on diamond surfa...

    2022

  17. [25]

    J. N. Neethirajan, T. Hache, D. Paone, D. Pinto, A. Denisenko, R. St¨ ohr, P. Udvarhelyi, A. Pershin, A. Gali, J. Wrachtrup, K. Kern, and A. Singha, Con- trolled surface modification to revive shallow nv– centers, Nano Lett. 23, 2563–2569 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Kumar, S

    R. Kumar, S. Mahajan, F. Donaldson, S. Dhomkar, H. J. Lancaster, C. Kalha, A. A. Riaz, Y. Zhu, C. A. Howard, A. Regoutz, and J. J. L. Morton, Stability of near-surface nitrogen vacancy centers using dielectric surface passiva- tion, ACS Photonics 11, 1244–1251 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Budnik, O

    R. Budnik, O. Cheshnovsky, O. Slone, and T. Volansky, Direct detection of light dark matter and solar neutrinos via color center production in crystals, Phys. Lett. B782, 242 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    A. R. Kirkpatrick, G. Chen, H. Witkowska, J. Brixey, B. L. Green, M. J. Booth, P. S. Salter, and J. M. Smith, Ab initio study of defect interactions between the neg- atively charged nitrogen vacancy centre and the carbon self-interstitial in diamond, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 382...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Belthangady, N

    C. Belthangady, N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, K. Arai, D. Le Sage, P. Cappellaro, and R. L. Walsworth, Dressed- state resonant coupling between bright and dark spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 157601 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    A. O. Sushkov, I. Lovchinsky, N. Chisholm, R. L. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Magnetic reso- nance detection of individual proton spins using quantum reporters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 197601 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Bauch, S

    E. Bauch, S. Singh, J. Lee, C. A. Hart, J. M. Schloss, M. J. Turner, J. F. Barry, L. M. Pham, N. Bar-Gill, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, Decoherence of ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134210 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    J. C. Marcks, M. Onizhuk, Y.-X. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Jin, B. S. Soloway, M. Fukami, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, A. A. Clerk, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quantum spin probe of single charge dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 130802 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Rajendran, N

    S. Rajendran, N. Zobrist, A. O. Sushkov, R. Walsworth, and M. Lukin, A method for directional detection of dark matter using spectroscopy of crystal defects, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Ebadi, M

    R. Ebadi, M. C. Marshall, D. F. Phillips, J. Cremer, T. Zhou, M. Titze, P. Kehayias, M. S. Ziabari, N. Dele- gan, S. Rajendran, A. O. Sushkov, F. J. Heremans, E. S. Bielejec, M. V. Holt, and R. L. Walsworth, Directional detection of dark matter using solid-state quantum sens- ...

    2022

  27. [35]

    Dreyer, G

    C. Dreyer, G. Lopez-Morales, S. Linden, P. Salter, and J. M. Zajac, Quantum sensing with arrays of NV centers for high energy physics, Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition , paper QTh4C.6 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Chen, D.-F

    X.-D. Chen, D.-F. Li, Y. Zheng, S. Li, B. Du, Y. Dong, C.-H. Dong, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Superresolution multifunctional sensing with the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 044039 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Z. Guo, Y. Huang, M. Cai, C. Li, M. Shen, M. Wang, P. Yu, Y. Wang, F. Shi, P. Wang, and J. Du, Wide-field fourier magnetic imaging with electron spins in diamond, npj Quantum Inf. 10 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    S. L. Dudarev and P.-W. Ma, Elastic fields, dipole ten- sors, and interaction between self-interstitial atom de- fects in bcc transition metals, Phys. Rev. Materials 86 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Clouet, C

    E. Clouet, C. Varvenne, and T. Jourdan, Elastic mod- eling of point-defects and their interaction, Comp. Mat. Sci. 147, 49 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Gengor, O

    G. Gengor, O. Celebi, A. Mohammed, and H. Sehitoglu, Continuum strain of point defects, Journal of the Me- chanics and Physics of Solids 188, 105653 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature 455, 644–647 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Manson and J

    N. Manson and J. Harrison, Photo-ionization of the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Diamond and Re- lated Materials 14, 1705 (2005)

    2005

  35. [43]

    Lozovoi, H

    A. Lozovoi, H. Jayakumar, D. Daw, G. Vizkelethy, E. Bielejec, M. W. Doherty, J. Flick, and C. A. Mer- iles, Optical activation and detection of charge transport between individual colour centres in diamond, Nat. Elec- tron 4, 717 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Lozovoi, Y

    A. Lozovoi, Y. Chen, G. Vizkelethy, E. Bielejec, J. Flick, M. Doherty, and C. Meriles, Detection and modeling of hole capture by single point defects under variable elec- tric fields, Nano Lett. 23, 4495 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    G. I. L´ opez-Morales, J. M. Zajac, J. Flick, C. A. Meriles, and C. E. Dreyer, Quantum embedding study of strain- and electric-field-induced stark effects on the NV− center in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245127 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Varvenne and E

    C. Varvenne and E. Clouet, Elastic dipoles of point de- fects from atomistic simulations, Phys. Rev. B96, 224103 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    H. J. McSkimin and P. Andreatch, Elastic moduli of dia- mond as a function of pressure and temperature, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2944 (1972)

    1972

  40. [48]

    Fukumoto, First-principles pseudopotential calcula- tions of the elastic properties of diamond, Si, and Ge, Phys

    A. Fukumoto, First-principles pseudopotential calcula- tions of the elastic properties of diamond, Si, and Ge, Phys. Rev. B 42, 7462 (1990)

    1990

  41. [49]

    G¨ uler and M

    E. G¨ uler and M. G¨ uler, Elastic and mechanical proper- ties of cubic diamond under pressure, Chin. J. Phys. 53 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    J. R. Maze, A. Gali, E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. Trifonov, E. Kaxiras, and M. D. Lukin, Properties of nitrogen- vacancy centers in diamond: the group theoretic ap- proach, New J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Terzakis, M

    G. Terzakis, M. Lourakis, and D. Ait-Boudaoud, Modi- fied rodrigues parameters: An efficient representation of orientation in 3d vision and graphics, J. Math. Imaging Vis. 60, 422 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    T. Cao, D. Cuffari, and A. Bongiorno, First-principles calculation of third-order elastic constants via numerical differentiation of the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 216001 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    D. S. P. Tanner, M. A. Caro, S. Schulz, and E. P. O’Reilly, Hybrid functional study of nonlinear elasticity and inter- nal strain in zinc-blende III-V materials, Phys. Rev. Mat. 3, 013604 (2019). 15

    2019

  46. [54]

    Lozovoi, H

    A. Lozovoi, H. Jayakumar, D. Daw, A. Lakra, and C. A. Meriles, Probing metastable space-charge potentials in a wide band gap semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 256602 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    A. Wood, A. Lozovoi, Z.-H. Zhang, S. Sharma, G. I. L´ opez-Morales, H. Jayakumar, N. P. de Leon, and C. A. Meriles, Room-temperature photochromism of silicon va- cancy centers in cvd diamond, Nano Lett. 23, 1017–1022 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Garcia-Arellano, G

    G. Garcia-Arellano, G. I. L´ opez-Morales, N. B. Manson, J. Flick, A. A. Wood, and C. A. Meriles, Photo-induced charge state dynamics of the neutral and negatively charged silicon vacancy centers in room-temperature di- amond, Adv. Sci. (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    R. M. Goldblatt, N. Dontschuk, D. J. McCloskey, A. M. Martin, and A. A. Wood, Quantum electrome- try of non-volatile space charges in diamond, arXiv , arXiv:2410.19309 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Z. Li, X. Guo, Y. Jin, F. Andreoli, A. Bilgin, D. D. Awschalom, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, D. Chang, G. Galli, and A. A. High, Atomic optical antennas in solids, Nat. Photon. 18, 1113 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    De´ ak, B

    P. De´ ak, B. Aradi, M. Kaviani, T. Frauenheim, and A. Gali, Formation of NV centers in diamond: A theoret- ical study based on calculated transitions and migration of nitrogen and vacancy related defects, Phys. Rev. B89, 075203 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Shim, E.-K

    J. Shim, E.-K. Lee, Y. J. Lee, and R. M. Nieminen, Density-functional calculations of defect formation ener- gies using supercell methods: Defects in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 71, 035206 (2005)

    2005

  53. [61]

    Makov and M

    G. Makov and M. C. Payne, Periodic boundary con- ditions in ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4014–4022 (1995)

    1995

  54. [62]

    Freysoldt, J

    C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. V. de Walle, Fully ab initio finite-size corrections for charged-defect super- cell calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016402 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    Freysoldt, J

    C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. V. de Walle, Elec- trostatic interactions between charged defects in super- cells, Phys. Status Solidi B 248, 1067– (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Komsa and A

    H.-P. Komsa and A. Pasquarello, Finite-size supercell correction for charged defects at surfaces and interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 095505 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    Kumagai and F

    Y. Kumagai and F. Oba, Electrostatics-based finite-size corrections for first-principles point defect calculations, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195205 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    T. J. Smart, F. Wu, M. Govoni, and Y. Ping, Fundamen- tal principles for calculating charged defect ionization en- ergies in ultrathin two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 124002 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Freysoldt and J

    C. Freysoldt and J. Neugebauer, First-principles calcula- tions for charged defects at surfaces, interfaces, and two- dimensional materials in the presence of electric fields, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205425 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Chagas da Silva, M

    M. Chagas da Silva, M. Lorke, B. Aradi, M. Farza- lipour Tabriz, T. Frauenheim, A. Rubio, D. Rocca, and P. De´ ak, Self-consistent potential correction for charged periodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 076401 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Bhagavantam and D

    S. Bhagavantam and D. A. A. S. N. Rao, Dielectric con- stant of diamond, Nature 161, 729 (1948)

    1948

  62. [70]

    Ibarra, M

    A. Ibarra, M. Gonz´ alez, and J. M. R. Vila, Wide fre- quency dielectric properties of cvd diamond, Diamond and Related Materials 6, 856–859 (1994)

    1994

  63. [71]

    The x direction is taken to be in the remaining mirror plane, and y perpendicular to it

    Note that 3Ex and 3Ey are chosen to be eigenstates in the point group Cs, i.e., after the symmetry is broken by field or strain. The x direction is taken to be in the remaining mirror plane, and y perpendicular to it

  64. [72]

    Delord, R

    T. Delord, R. Monge, G. I. L´ opez-Morales, J. Flick, C. E. Dreyer, and C. A. Meriles, Probing electric-dipole- enabled transitions in the excited state of the nitrogen- vacancy center in diamond, arXiv , arXiv:2405.16280v1 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    B. A. McCullian, V. Sharma, H. Y. Chen, J. C. Cross- man, E. J. Mueller, and G. D. Fuchs, Coherent acoustic control of defect orbital states in the strong-driving limit, PRX Quantum 5 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports 528, 1–45 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  68. [76]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  69. [77]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996), erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

    1996

  70. [78]

    Chakravarthi, C

    S. Chakravarthi, C. Pederson, Z. Kazi, A. Ivanov, and K.-M. C. Fu, Impact of surface and laser-induced noise on the spectral stability of implanted nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085425 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    L. J. Rogers, R. L. McMurtrie, M. J. Sellars, and N. B. Manson, Time-averaging within the excited state of the nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond, New J. Phys. 11 (2009)

    2009

  72. [80]

    V. M. Acosta, C. Santori, A. Faraon, Z. Huang, K.- M. C. Fu, A. Stacey, D. A. Simpson, K. Ganesan, S. Tomljenovic-Hanic, A. D. Greentree, S. Prawer, and R. G. Beausoleil, Dynamic stabilization of the optical res- onances of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev...

    2012

  73. [81]

    Monge, Y

    R. Monge, Y. Nakamura, O. Bach, J. Shao, A. Lozovoi, A. A. Wood, K. Sasaki, K. Kobayashi, T. Delord, and C. A. Meriles, Beyond ensemble averaging: Parallelized single-shot readout of hole capture in diamond, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2507.11722 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    K.-M. C. Fu, C. Santori, P. E. Barclay, L. J. Rogers, N. B. Manson, and R. G. Beausoleil, Observation of the dynamic Jahn-Teller effect in the excited states of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 256404 (2009)

    2009

  75. [83]

    Happacher, D

    J. Happacher, D. A. Broadway, J. Bocquel, P. Reiser, A. Jimenez, M. A. Tschudin, L. Thiel, D. Rohner, M. li Grimau Puigibert, B. Shields, J. R. Maze, V. Jacques, and P. Maletinsky, Low-temperature pho- tophysics of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1...

    2022

  76. [101]

    split- interstitial

    strain case; then we fixed these values and fitted the rest of the parameters to the [1 11] strain calculation. This provided consistent susceptibilities for all strains. From this procedure, we obtain coefficients (with quadratic components in parentheses) χA1 , χA′ 1 , χE , ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.