Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 43 references

Gravitational Lensing in the Schwarzschild Spacetime: Photon Rings in Vacuum and in the Presence of a Plasma

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-22 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Inhomogeneous plasma around a Schwarzschild black hole changes the size and shape of photon rings in a frequency-dependent way that multifrequency observations can use to measure plasma properties.

desk verdict The paper supplies analytic expressions for photon rings under one specific inhomogeneous plasma profile around Schwarzschild, but the separability of the ray equations needs explicit confirmation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00624 v1 pith:XJRFTEYR submitted 2025-08-01 gr-qc

Torben C. Frost This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitationallensingphotonringsSchwarzschildblackholeinhomogeneousplasmaaccretiondiskmultifrequencyobservationsnullgeodesics
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationalexander_duality_circle_linking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs an analytic model of a pressureless, non-magnetised plasma whose electron density rises toward the equatorial plane near a non-rotating black hole. It integrates the null geodesic equations exactly, places a distant observer, and maps the direct image plus the first- and second-order photon rings onto the celestial sphere. The resulting lens equation, redshifts, and travel times differ from the vacuum and uniform-plasma cases. A sympathetic reader cares because real black-hole images contain light that has passed through surrounding gas; frequency-dependent ring distortions therefore supply a direct probe of that gas without assuming uniformity.

What carries the argument

Analytic integration of the null geodesic equations for the specific inhomogeneous plasma density profile, which yields explicit relations between impact parameters and observer angles.

What would settle it

Multifrequency images of photon rings around a known-mass black hole that show no measurable change in ring radius or shape between frequencies would contradict the predicted effect of the inhomogeneous plasma model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the chosen analytic plasma model the geodesic equations integrate in closed form. An orthonormal tetrad at the observer converts the constants of motion into latitude-longitude coordinates on the celestial sphere. The direct image and the first- and second-order photon rings therefore occupy frequency-dependent locations and shapes. These locations are compared with the vacuum and homogeneous-plasma limits, and the redshift and travel time are computed explicitly. The structural differences that appear are shown to be usable for extracting plasma properties from multifrequency data.

Load-bearing premise

The plasma electron density is given by a functional form that allows the geodesic equations to be integrated completely in closed form.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The first-order photon ring contracts or expands with observing frequency in a manner distinct from the vacuum case.
  • The second-order ring exhibits an even larger relative shift, amplifying the observable signature of the density gradient.
  • Redshift and travel-time differences between frequencies provide independent observables that can be combined with ring geometry.
  • Comparison with homogeneous-plasma results isolates the effect of the equatorial density increase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same analytic approach could be tested against numerical ray-tracing codes that use more realistic density profiles.
  • If the model is approximately correct, existing black-hole images could be re-analyzed at multiple frequencies to place limits on plasma gradients.
  • Extension to Kerr spacetime would be a natural next step to assess whether spin changes the frequency dependence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines gravitational lensing by a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by an inhomogeneous, pressureless, non-magnetized plasma whose electron density increases toward the equatorial plane near the horizon. It derives the plasma-modified equations of motion, claims to solve them analytically, places an observer in the outer domain, introduces an orthonormal tetrad to map constants of motion to celestial-sphere coordinates, computes the direct image and first- and second-order photon rings, writes a lens equation, and evaluates redshift and travel time. These quantities are compared with the vacuum and homogeneous-plasma cases to argue that multifrequency observations of ring-structure changes can extract plasma properties.

Significance. If the analytic solutions are valid, the work supplies an explicit, parameter-free example in which plasma inhomogeneity produces traceable modifications to photon-ring geometry on the observer’s sky. This is directly relevant to interpreting multifrequency EHT or ngEHT data on black-hole shadows and rings. The absence of fitted parameters and the explicit comparison to vacuum and homogeneous cases are strengths that enhance the falsifiability of the proposed extraction method.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (derivation of equations of motion): the central claim that the chosen n_e(r,θ) permits fully analytic integration rests on the separability of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation once the ω_p²(r,θ)/ω² term is included. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that no residual r–θ coupling survives after the two Killing constants are imposed; otherwise the reported closed-form r(λ) and θ(λ) are at best approximate and the subsequent lens equation and ring-coordinate expressions in §4 lose their analytic traceability.
  2. [§4] §4 (photon rings and lens equation): the argument that structural changes in the first- and second-order rings can be used to extract plasma parameters via multifrequency observations presupposes that the analytic solutions of §3 remain valid across the relevant impact-parameter range. Without explicit checks against limiting cases (equatorial plane, large-r asymptotics, or homogeneous-plasma reduction) or error estimates on the integration, the extraction claim is not yet load-bearing.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the equations are “derived and solved analytically” but does not indicate the domain of validity or any approximations; this should be stated explicitly.
  2. [§2] Clarify the precise definition of the orthonormal tetrad and the mapping from conserved quantities to observer latitude-longitude coordinates; a short appendix or figure would help.
  3. [§5] Travel-time and redshift expressions should be compared numerically to the vacuum case for at least one concrete set of plasma parameters to illustrate the magnitude of the effect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting its potential relevance to multifrequency EHT observations. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and validations into a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (derivation of equations of motion): the central claim that the chosen n_e(r,θ) permits fully analytic integration rests on the separability of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation once the ω_p²(r,θ)/ω² term is included. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that no residual r–θ coupling survives after the two Killing constants are imposed; otherwise the reported closed-form r(λ) and θ(λ) are at best approximate and the subsequent lens equation and ring-coordinate expressions in §4 lose their analytic traceability.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of separability strengthens the presentation. The plasma density profile n_e(r,θ) was specifically constructed so that the term ω_p²(r,θ)/ω², when combined with the two Killing constants, produces an additive separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation into purely r-dependent and θ-dependent parts with no cross terms remaining. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short subsection in §3 that substitutes the conserved quantities, cancels all mixed r–θ contributions term by term, and arrives at the decoupled ordinary differential equations whose solutions are the reported closed-form expressions for r(λ) and θ(λ). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (photon rings and lens equation): the argument that structural changes in the first- and second-order rings can be used to extract plasma parameters via multifrequency observations presupposes that the analytic solutions of §3 remain valid across the relevant impact-parameter range. Without explicit checks against limiting cases (equatorial plane, large-r asymptotics, or homogeneous-plasma reduction) or error estimates on the integration, the extraction claim is not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: We accept that additional validation improves the robustness of the extraction argument. The revised §4 will contain direct comparisons of the analytic ring coordinates and lens equation against three limiting cases: (i) the equatorial-plane restriction, (ii) the large-r asymptotic expansion, and (iii) the exact reduction to the homogeneous-plasma solution. We will also report the maximum relative deviation obtained when the analytic expressions are cross-checked against numerical integration of the geodesic equations over the impact-parameter interval relevant to the first- and second-order rings, thereby quantifying the accuracy of the closed-form results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained from metric and plasma ansatz

full rationale

The paper begins with the Schwarzschild metric and a postulated analytic electron-density profile for the pressureless plasma, derives the modified geodesic equations, and states that this specific profile permits explicit integration in quadratures. It then constructs the observer tetrad, lens equation, and redshift expressions directly from those solutions without any fitted parameters, self-citation chains, or uniqueness theorems that reduce the outputs to the inputs by construction. The reported ring coordinates and structural changes are computed quantities, not redefinitions or statistical fits of the same data. This matches the default expectation of an independent derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Schwarzschild vacuum solution, the geometric-optics limit for light in a cold plasma, and the specific functional form chosen for the electron density; no new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Light propagation obeys the geometric-optics limit in a cold, pressureless, non-magnetised plasma whose refractive index depends only on electron density.
    Invoked to reduce the problem to null geodesics modified by a position-dependent refractive index.
  • standard math The background spacetime is exactly the Schwarzschild metric.
    Standard vacuum solution of Einstein's equations used throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Lensing in the Schwarzschild Spacetime: Photon Rings in Vacuum and in the Presence of a Plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJRFTEYR

@misc{pith2026250800624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Lensing in the Schwarzschild Spacetime: Photon Rings in Vacuum and in the Presence of a Plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJRFTEYR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00624}
}
read the original abstract

Astrophysical black holes are usually surrounded by an accretion disk. At least parts of these accretion disks consist of a plasma in which light rays with different energies are dispersed. However, we usually do not know the exact configurations of these plasmas. In this paper we will now use the example of a Schwarzschild black hole embedded in an inhomogeneous pressureless and nonmagnetised plasma to investigate how the structural changes of the photon rings can help us to determine the properties of a plasma surrounding a black hole using multifrequency observations. For this purpose we will use a simple analytic model which describes a plasma whose electron density increases towards the equatorial plane when we approach the event horizon. For the chosen model we will first derive and then analytically solve the equations of motion. Then we will place an observer in the domain of outer communication and introduce an orthonormal tetrad to relate the constants of motion to latitude-longitude coordinates on the observer's celestial sphere. In the next step we will use the analytic solutions to investigate the geometric structures of the direct image as well as the photon rings of first and second order on the observer's celestial sphere. We will write down a lens equation and calculate the redshift and the travel time. We will compare the obtained results to results for photon rings in vacuum and in the presence of a homogeneous plasma. Finally, we will discuss which of these quantities can be used to extract information about the properties of the plasma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.00624 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the lens equation. In our case we have a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Lens maps for the direct images in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum (top left panel), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Lens maps for the first-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum (top left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Lens maps for the second-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum (top left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Lens maps for the direct images in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Lens maps for the first-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Lens maps for the second-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Redshift maps for the direct images in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum (top left panel), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Redshift maps for the first-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Redshift maps for the second-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Travel time maps for the direct images in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum (top left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Travel time maps for the first-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Travel time maps for the second-order photon rings in the Schwarzschild spacetime for light rays travelling in vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In the presence of a plasma with the distribution specified in (6) it reads r4 + 2mE2 C E2 − E2 C r3 − K E2 − E2 C r2 + 2mK E2 − E2 C r = 0

    Roots of the r Motion For calculating the roots of the r motion we start with writing down the conditional equation. In the presence of a plasma with the distribution specified in (6) it reads r4 + 2mE2 C E2 − E2 C r3 − K E2 − E2 C r2 + 2mK E2 − E2 C r = 0. (A1) We can easily see that in the vacuum case with EC = 0 the second term vanishes and otherwise t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    As first step we take (40) and write down the conditional equation for the roots

    Roots of the ϑ Motion for Light Rays in the Inhomogeneous Plasma Calculating the roots of the ϑ motion is straight for- ward. As first step we take (40) and write down the conditional equation for the roots. For light rays propa- gating through the inhomogeneous plasma described by the distribution (6) it is a biquadratic polynomial and reads x4 + K − 2ω2...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Elementary Integrals In total we need to evaluate four different elementary integrals. After applying the coordinate transformation (26) we can rewrite all of them in one of the following forms I1 = Z y yi dy′ (y′ − ya) √y′ − y1 , (B1) I2 = Z y yi dy′ (y′ − ya)2 √y′ − y1 , (B2) where in the first integral the parameter ya can be −K/12, yH, or yph, while i...

    work page

  4. [4]

    II C we encountered several elliptic integrals

    Elliptic Integrals When we solved the equations of motion in Sec. II C we encountered several elliptic integrals. In this paper we will rewrite them in terms of elementary functions and Legendre’s elliptic integrals of the first, second, and third kind. However, before we use them to solve the equations of motion we need to define them. This is the purpos...

    work page

  5. [5]

    , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    , First Sagittarius A ∗ Event Horizon Telescope results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. , First Sagittarius A ∗ Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett 11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. V. Physical ori- gin of the asymmetric ring, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L5 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. , First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VIII. Magnetic field structure near the event horizon, Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L13 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    R. A. Breuer and J. Ehlers, Propagation of high- frequency electromagnetic waves through a magnetized plasma in curved space-time. I, Proc. R. Soc. A 370, 389–406 (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    R. A. Breuer and J. Ehlers, Propagation of high- frequency electromagnetic waves through a magnetized plasma in curved spaces-time. II. Application of the asymptotic approximation, Proc. R. Soc. A 374, 65–86 (1981)

    1981

  4. [12]

    Perlick, Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Appli- cations to General Relativity , Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    V. Perlick, Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Appli- cations to General Relativity , Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    O. Y. Tsupko and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Gravitational lensing in plasma: Relativistic images at homogeneous plasma, Phys. Rev. D 87, 124009 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Er and S

    X. Er and S. Mao, Effects of plasma on gravitational lensing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 2180 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Feleppa, V

    F. Feleppa, V. Bozza, and O. Y. Tsupko, Strong deflec- tion limit analysis of black hole lensing in inhomogeneous plasma, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064031 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Perlick, O

    V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically sym- metric black hole, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Light propagation in a plasma on Kerr spacetime: Separation of the Hamilton- Jacobi equation and calculation of the shadow, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104003 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Bezdˇ ekov´ a, V

    B. Bezdˇ ekov´ a, V. Perlick, and J. Biˇ c´ ak, Light propaga- tion in a plasma on an axially symmetric and stationary spacetime: Separability of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation and shadow, J. Math. Phys. 63, 092501 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Light propagation in a plasma on Kerr spacetime. II. Plasma imprint on pho- ton orbits, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064063 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    O. Y. Tsupko, Deflection of light rays by a spherically symmetric black hole in a dispersive medium, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104019 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Luminet, Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk, Astron

    J.-P. Luminet, Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk, Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228 (1979)

    1979

  14. [22]

    Johannsen and D

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum. II. Black hole images, Astrophys. J. 718, 446 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Aratore, O

    F. Aratore, O. Y. Tsupko, and V. Perlick, Constraining spherically symmetric metrics by the gap between photon rings, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124057 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    A. E. Broderick et al. , The photon ring in M87 ∗, Astro- phys. J. 935, 61 (2022). 39

    2022

  17. [25]

    Lockhart and S

    W. Lockhart and S. E. Gralla, How narrow is the M87 ∗ ring – II. A new geometric model, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 2462–2470 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    M. D. Johnson et al. , The Black Hole Explorer: moti- vation and vision, in Space Telescopes and Instrumenta- tion 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , Vol. 13092, edited by L. E. Coyle, S. Matsuura, and M. D. Perrin, International Society for Optics and Photonics (S...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. 528, L13 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Desire, A

    T. Desire, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, and A. Chael, Mul- tifrequency models of black hole photon rings from low- luminosity accretion disks, Astrophys. J.980, 262 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Kobialko, D

    K. Kobialko, D. Gal’tsov, and A. Molchanov, Gravita- tional shadow and emission spectrum of thin accretion disks in a plasma medium, arXiv:2505.07993 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Perlick, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a black hole, Astron

    V. Perlick, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a black hole, Astron. Rep. 67, S102 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Mino, Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys

    Y. Mino, Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084027 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca, Null geodesics of the Kerr exterior, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044032 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    T. C. Frost, Gravitational lensing of massive particles in the charged NUT spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124019 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Hancock, Elliptic Integrals, 1st ed., edited by M

    H. Hancock, Elliptic Integrals, 1st ed., edited by M. Mer- riman and R. S. Woodward, Mathematical Monographs (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1917)

    1917

  27. [35]

    Grenzebach, V

    A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. L¨ ammerzahl, Photon regions and shadows of accelerated black holes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1542024 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

    1984

  29. [37]

    A. Bohn, W. Throwe, F. H´ ebert, K. Henriksson, D. Bunandar, M. A. Scheel, and N. W. Taylor, What does a binary black hole merger look like?, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 065002 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Frittelli and E

    S. Frittelli and E. T. Newman, Exact universal gravita- tional lensing equation, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124001 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    Perlick, Exact gravitational lens equation in spheri- cally symmetric and static spacetimes, Phys

    V. Perlick, Exact gravitational lens equation in spheri- cally symmetric and static spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 69, 064017 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Rev. 59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    M¨ uller and M

    A. M¨ uller and M. Camenzind, Relativistic emission lines from accreting black holes - The effect of disk truncation on line profiles, Astron. Astrophys. 413, 861 (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    L. M. Milne-Thomson, Elliptic Integrals, in Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Applied Mathematics Series, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (U. S. Dept. of Com- merce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington D. C.,

  35. [43]

    10th ed., pp. 587–607

Pith tools

Reviewed May 22, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.