Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Cotton and Conformal Killing Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that both Cotton gravity and Conformal Killing gravity admit generalized Vaidya-type spacetimes whose mass functions include purely geometric correction terms beyond the matter contribution.

desk verdict New Vaidya-type solutions for Cotton and Conformal Killing gravity, but the printed equations don't solve their own field equations—fix the factor-2 error and the unstated constant-ρ0 restriction and this becomes a solid paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01827 v1 pith:HSIXAAGJ submitted 2025-08-03 gr-qc

Metin Gürses , Yaghoub Heydarzade , Çetin Şentürk This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.20.Jb04.50.Kd04.70.Bw
keywords cottongravityconformalkillingvaidyaspacetimeexactsolutionsmodifiednullfluidcodazzitensormassfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that two modified theories of gravity—Cotton gravity and Conformal Killing gravity—each admit a generalized Vaidya spacetime, the classic radiating-black-hole solution of general relativity, with a mass function that depends on both retarded time and radius. The authors solve the non-vacuum field equations in their second-rank forms and find that, beyond the ordinary matter term, the mass function acquires extra polynomial terms in the radius that are purely geometric. If correct, these solutions extend the standard toolkit for modeling evaporating or accreting black holes and gravitational collapse into these higher-order theories. They also sharpen the contrast between the two theories: the Cotton case allows time-dependent vacuum solutions with $r^2$ and $r^3$ corrections, while the Conformal Killing case forces its vacuum mass function to be static.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the second-rank reformulation of each theory: Cotton gravity is recast as $G_{\mu\nu} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu} + H_{\mu\nu}$ with $\tilde{H}_{\mu\nu} = H_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{3} H g_{\mu\nu}$ a Codazzi tensor, and Conformal Killing gravity as the same Einstein-type equation with $\tilde{H}_{\mu\nu} = H_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{6} H g_{\mu\nu}$ satisfying $\nabla_\alpha \tilde{H}_{\mu\beta} + \nabla_\mu \tilde{H}_{\beta\alpha} + \nabla_\beta \tilde{H}_{\alpha\mu} = 0$. These formulations turn third-rank, third-derivative field equations into a system of first-order PDEs on $\tilde{H}_{\mu\nu}$; the authors compute the components of $\tilde{H}_{\mu\nu}$ for the generalized Vaidya ansatz and reduce the equations to the four independent PDEs whose integration yields the mass functions and matter densities.

What would settle it

Take the generalized Vaidya metric with the mass function (25) or (54) and substitute it directly into the original third-rank Cotton tensor field equations before the Codazzi reduction; if any independent component of those equations fails to vanish for a non-constant $C_1(u)$ or $C_2(u)$, the claimed geometric radiating solutions would not be solutions of the original theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the generalized Vaidya metric $ds^2 = -f(u,r)\,du^2 + 2\,du\,dr + r^2 d\Omega^2$ with $f = 1 - 2M(u,r)/r$ solves the non-vacuum field equations of both theories when the matter content is a null fluid plus a barotropic timelike fluid with $p = w\rho$. In Cotton gravity the mass function takes $M(u,r) = C_0(u) + \frac{1}{2} C_1(u) r^2 + \frac{1}{3} C_2(u) r^3 + \frac{\kappa \rho_0(u)}{2(1-2w)} r^{1-2w}$, while in Conformal Killing gravity it takes $M(u,r) = C_0(u) + \frac{1}{3} C_1 r^3 + \frac{1}{5} C_2 r^5 + \frac{\kappa \rho_0(u)}{2(1-2w)} r^{1-2w}$, with $C_1$ and $C_2$ constrained to constants by consistency. In both theories the timelike density obeys $\rho(u,r) = \rho_0(u) r^{-2(1+w)}$, and the null density is fixed in terms of the time derivatives of the mass functions. These formulas show that the additional $r^2$/$r^3$ (Cotton) and $r^3$/$r^5$ (Conformal Killing) terms come from geometry rather than from the matter source. The paper also shows that the original Vaidya solution is not a vacuum solution of either theory unless its mass is constant, whereas adding a suitable timelike source restores it.

Load-bearing premise

The entire derivation runs in the second-rank Codazzi-type reformulations of the two theories, and the paper relies on the cited equivalence between those reformulations and the original third-rank field equations without proving it; if that equivalence fails, the new Vaidya solutions may not solve the theories as originally defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the solutions are correct, a radiating spherically symmetric black hole in Cotton gravity can carry time-dependent geometric mass terms proportional to $r^2$ and $r^3$ even when no matter is present.
  • In Conformal Killing gravity the same kind of geometric corrections exist but become static constants in vacuum, so no purely geometric radiating solution survives in that theory.
  • The original Vaidya metric can be recovered as a solution with a timelike matter source in both theories, which is not possible in vacuum; in general relativity the same metric needs only null radiation.
  • The shared matter density profile $\rho = \rho_0(u) r^{-2(1+w)}$ means the two theories make identical predictions for the radial falloff of the timelike fluid in these solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the physical meaning of the geometric $r^2$ and $r^3$ terms by locating the apparent horizon $r = 2M(u,r)$ and checking whether the corrections move the horizon radius or create multiple horizons for realistic choices of $C_i(u)$.
  • The solutions suggest a concrete way to extend the standard Vaidya-based collapse and cosmic-censorship studies: repeat the usual null-fluid collapse analysis with the polynomial geometric terms and see whether naked-singularity formation is suppressed or enhanced.
  • A direct observational probe would be to fit the late-time mass-loss rate $\dot{C}_0(u)$ in these metrics to black-hole evaporation models; the extra terms alter the relation between null energy flux and mass loss compared with general relativity.
  • Because the two theories differ only in the allowed powers of $r$ in the geometric terms, a sufficiently clean measurement of the near-horizon metric of an accreting black hole could in principle distinguish Cotton gravity from Conformal Killing gravity, though the required precision is far beyond current observations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the generalized Vaidya spacetime ds^2 = -f(u,r) du^2 + 2 du dr + r^2 dOmega^2 in Cotton Gravity (CG) and Conformal Killing Gravity (CKG), working in the second-rank Codazzi formulations. It assumes an energy-momentum tensor made of a null fluid and a barotropic perfect fluid with p = w rho, derives the component equations for a general M(u,r), integrates them, and presents explicit mass functions M(u,r) = C0(u) + (geometric terms) + (kappa rho0/(2(1-2w))) r^{1-2w} together with the null densities mu(u,r). The paper then discusses five special cases for each theory, including vacuum and purely null cases. The derivation is by direct integration of the displayed field equations, with the arbitrary functions/constants C0, C1, C2, rho0 and the constant w labeling the solution families rather than being fitted to a target result.

Significance. If corrected, the solutions are a useful addition to the exact-solutions literature for third-rank gravity theories: they provide explicit non-vacuum radiating spacetimes, exhibit purely geometric r^2 and r^3 corrections in CG and r^3 and r^5 corrections in CKG, and they clarify the differences from GR, such as the absence of a vacuum Vaidya solution with M = M(u). The paper is transparent in its case-by-case analysis and does not hide free parameters. However, as printed, the central general solution for CG does not satisfy the displayed field equations, so the main claim that Eqs. (24)-(26) define a complete family of exact solutions is not correct as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (26) and Remark 2, Eq. (29)] The general CG null density is displayed with a missing factor of 2. Substituting M from Eq. (25) and rho from Eq. (24) into Eq. (18) gives 6 dot{M} - 4r dot{M}' + r^2 dot{M}'' = 6 dot{C0} + 3 kappa dot{rho0}/(1-2w) r^{1-2w}, so Eq. (18) requires mu = 2 dot{C0}/(kappa r^2) + dot{rho0}/(1-2w) r^{-(1+2w)}. The printed Eq. (26) has dot{C0}/(kappa r^2) instead of 2 dot{C0}/(kappa r^2). This is not a harmless typo: the displayed triple (24)-(26) does not satisfy Eq. (18). The same error appears in Remark 2, Eq. (29), and in the Section 5 summary. Notably, the Case IV results in Eqs. (35)-(36) already contain the correct factor 2, which exposes the internal inconsistency. All instances should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4, Remark 6, Eqs. (61)-(62)] The CKG Case IV display for w = -2 omits the restriction rho0 = const. If rho0(u) is allowed, the r^5 term in Eq. (54) cannot be absorbed into C2 because Eq. (53) requires C2 to be constant, and Eq. (55) would contain the additional term dot{rho0}/(1-2w) r^{-(1+2w)}, which for w = -2 is dot{rho0} r^3/5. The formulas in Eqs. (61)-(62) are therefore valid only when rho0 is constant, a condition that is stated for w = -1 in Eq. (61) but not for w = -2. Please state this restriction explicitly.
  3. [Sections 3 and 4, Eqs. (25) and (54)] Both 'complete' solution families divide by (1-2w) and therefore exclude w = 1/2 without comment. For w = 1/2, rho = rho0(u) r^{-3}, and the source terms in Eqs. (17) and (43) are nonzero, but the power-law ansatz r^{1-2w} becomes r^0, which lies in the kernel of the respective homogeneous operators; the particular solution is logarithmic (M_p proportional to rho0(u) ln r), not the displayed power law. Either add the w = 1/2 branch or explicitly state that w = 1/2 is excluded from the claimed complete family.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (1); Eqs. (15), (41)] The angular part is printed as 'sin2 dphi^2' and 'sin 2 theta' in several places; it should be sin^2 theta dphi^2 and sin^2 theta.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (57)] The mass function in Remark 2 contains '1/5 C5 r^5', which should be '1/5 C2 r^5'.
  3. [Section 5, Conclusion] The CKG null density is printed as 'dot{2}C0(u)/(kappa r^2)'; this should be '2 dot{C0}(u)/(kappa r^2)'. The CG null density in the conclusion also needs the factor-2 correction from Major Comment 1.
  4. [Section 4, Remark 4] The sentence 'the mass function must remain constant' after Eq. (59) is imprecise: the displayed M is independent of u but has r^3 and r^5 terms, so it is static rather than constant in r.
  5. [Introduction and Sections 3-4] The derivations rely on the equivalence between the original third-rank Cotton/Conformal Killing equations and the second-rank Codazzi formulations cited from Refs. [6,23]. Given the ongoing debate on Cotton gravity (Refs. [8-13]), a sentence explicitly stating that all results are derived within this Codazzi formulation would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the generalized Vaidya solutions are obtained by direct integration of the stated field equations, with no fitted parameters or self-citational load-bearing steps.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained relative to its stated assumptions. The mass functions in Eqs. (25), (51), (54) and the null densities in Eqs. (26), (55) are obtained by solving the differential system (16)-(21) for Cotton gravity and (42)-(47) for Conformal Killing gravity. The arbitrary functions C0(u), C1(u), C2(u) and ρ0(u), together with the constant w, are integration constants and equation-of-state parameters that label the solution family; they are not fitted to any target result, and no quantity is defined in terms of the conclusion. The Codazzi-type formulations in Eqs. (7) and (37) are cited to Mantica and Molinari (Refs. [6] and [23]), which are external works, not self-citations, and the paper does not rely on any uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' own prior work. Self-citations such as Ref. [14] on wave metrics appear only as background and are not load-bearing for the Vaidya-type solutions derived here. The claim that substituting back the solutions imposes C1 = const. and C2 = const. in CKG is a consistency condition obtained from the field equations, not an input. Even if the displayed expressions contained algebraic errors, as a skeptical reading suggests, that would be a correctness issue rather than circularity; the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs. Accordingly, no circular step can be identified, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The solution family is parameterized by integration functions, not fitted constants; the only hand-chosen parameter is w. The main external input is the equivalence of the Codazzi formulations, taken from prior work without proof.

free parameters (5)
  • w = constant
    Equation-of-state parameter p = w rho; chosen by hand, not fitted. The solutions are valid for arbitrary constant w except special values where terms merge.
  • C0(u)
    Arbitrary integration function; labels the Vaidya mass background. Not fitted.
  • C1(u) in CG / C1 in CKG
    Coefficient of r^2 in CG and r^3 in CKG; arbitrary function in CG, forced to be constant in CKG by consistency.
  • C2(u) in CG / C2 in CKG
    Coefficient of r^3 in CG and r^5 in CKG; arbitrary function in CG, forced to be constant in CKG.
  • rho0(u)
    Arbitrary amplitude of the timelike matter density profile rho = rho0(u) r^{-2(1+w)}.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Codazzi formulation of Cotton Gravity (Eq. 7) is equivalent to Harada's original theory
    Used throughout Section 3; cited to [6]; not proven here.
  • domain assumption Conformal Killing tensor formulation of CKG (Eq. 37) is equivalent to Harada's original theory
    Used throughout Section 4; cited to [23].
  • domain assumption The energy-momentum tensor splits into a null fluid plus a timelike perfect fluid (Eqs. 8-10)
    Restricts the matter content; the claims cover only this class of sources.
  • domain assumption Barotropic equation of state p = w rho with constant w
    Needed to integrate Eq. (23) and Eq. (49); restricts the generality of the matter model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Cotton and Conformal Killing Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HSIXAAGJ

@misc{pith2026250801827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Cotton and Conformal Killing Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HSIXAAGJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01827}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that the non-vacuum field equations of Cotton gravity and Conformal Killing gravity admit a generalized class of Vaidya-type solutions. In particular, beyond the standard induced term associated with the matter source, the generalized metric incorporates two additional correction terms of purely geometric origin, arising from the unique structure of these theories. This extended solution generalizes the classical Vaidya spacetime in General Relativity and offers new insights into the dynamics of radiating spacetimes within the framework of these third-rank gravity theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Harada,Emergence of the cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys

    J. Harada,Emergence of the cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys. Rev. D 103, L121502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Harada,Cotton gravity and 84 galaxy rotation curves, Phys

    J. Harada,Cotton gravity and 84 galaxy rotation curves, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064044, (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Gogberashvili and A

    M. Gogberashvili and A. Girgvliani,General spherically symmetric solution of Cotton gravity, Class. Quant. Gravity 41, 025010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    E. L. B. Junior, J. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. Dias da Silva, and H. A. Vieira,Black bounces in Cotton gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1190 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    S. D. Hazinedar, Y. Heydarzade, and M. Ranjbar,Non-Vacuum Solutions in Cotton Theory, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064011 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari,Codazzi tensors and their space-times, and Cotton gravity, Gen. Relativ. Grav. 55, 62 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    R. A. Sussman and S. Najera, Exact solutions of Cotton Gravity in its Codazzi formulation , arXiv:2312.02115 [gr-qc]. 10

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Bargueño, Comment on Emergence of the Cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys

    P. Bargueño, Comment on Emergence of the Cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 088501 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Harada,Reply to Comment on Emergence of the Cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys

    J. Harada,Reply to Comment on Emergence of the Cotton tensor for describing gravity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 088502 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Clément and K

    G. Clément and K. Nouicer,Cotton gravity is not predictive, Phys. Lett. B 856, 138947 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Cotton Gravity

    R. A. Sussman, C. A. Mantica, L.G. Molinari, and S. Nájera,Response to a critique of "Cotton Gravity", arXiv:2401.10479 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Clément and K

    G. Clément and K. Nouicer,Farewell to Cotton gravity, arXiv:2401.16008 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Cotton Gravity

    R. A. Sussman, C. A. Mantica, L. G. Molinari, and S. Nájera,Second Response to the critique of "Cotton Gravity", arXiv:2402.01992 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gürses, Y

    M. Gürses, Y. Heydarzade, Ç. Şentürk,Wave metrics in the Cotton and conformal Killing gravity theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084082 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Altas and B

    E. Altas and B. Tekin,Vanishing of Conserved Charges in Cotton Gravity, Phys.Rev.D 111, L021503, (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Harada,Gravity at cosmological distances: Explaining the accelerating expansion without dark energy, Phys

    J. Harada,Gravity at cosmological distances: Explaining the accelerating expansion without dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044031 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Harada,Dark energy in conformal Killing gravity, Phys

    J. Harada,Dark energy in conformal Killing gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104037 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Barnes,Spherically symmetric electrovac spacetimes in conformal Killing gravity, Class

    A. Barnes,Spherically symmetric electrovac spacetimes in conformal Killing gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 155007 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari,Conformal Killing gravity in static spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044025 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Clément and K

    G. Clément and K. Nouicer,Spherical symmetric solutions of conformal Killing gravity: black holes, wormholes, and sourceless cosmologies, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 165005 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, and M. E. Rodrigues,(Regular) Black holes in conformal Killing gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and scalar fields, Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 055012 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, and M. E. Rodrigues,Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 557 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari,Note on Harada’s conformal Killing gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 124029 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari,Friedmann equations in the Codazzi parametrization of Cotton and extended theories of gravity and the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044059 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Conformal Killing cosmology: Geometry, dark sector, growth of structures, and big rip, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064041 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Barnes,pp-waves in conformal Killing gravity, arXiv:2404.09310 [gr-qc]

    A. Barnes,pp-waves in conformal Killing gravity, arXiv:2404.09310 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    P. C. Vaidya,The gravitational field of a radiating star, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 33, 264 (1951); P. C. Vaidya,The External Field of a Radiating Star in General Relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 31, 119 (1999). 11

    1951

  20. [28]

    W. A. Hiscock,Models of evaporating black holes. I, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2813 (1981); W. A. Hiscock,Models of evaporating black holes. II. Effects of the outgoing created radiation, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2823 (1981)

    1981

  21. [29]

    W. A. Hiscock, L. G. Williams and D. M. Eardley,Creation of particles by shell-focusing singularities, Phys. Rev. D 26, 751 (1982)

    1982

  22. [30]

    Kuroda,Vaidya Spacetime as an Evaporating Black Hole, Prog

    Y. Kuroda,Vaidya Spacetime as an Evaporating Black Hole, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 1422 (1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    Parentani,Quantum metric fluctuations and Hawking radiation, Phys

    R. Parentani,Quantum metric fluctuations and Hawking radiation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 041503 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek,Global structure of evaporating black holes, Phys. Lett. B 449, 1 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    S. H. Mehdipour,Hawking radiation as tunneling from a Vaidya black hole in noncommutative gravity, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124049 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Sawayama,Evaporating dynamical horizon with the Hawking effect in Vaidya spacetime, Phys

    S. Sawayama,Evaporating dynamical horizon with the Hawking effect in Vaidya spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 73.6, 064024 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969)

    1969

  28. [36]

    S. G. Ghosh and N. Dadhich,Naked singularities in higher dimensional Vaidya space-times, Phys. Rev. D 64, 047501 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    I. H. Dwivedi and P. S. Joshi,On the nature of naked singularities in Vaidya spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav 6.11, 1599(1989)

    1989

  30. [38]

    Kuroda,Naked singularities in the Vaidya spacetime, Prog

    Y. Kuroda,Naked singularities in the Vaidya spacetime, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72(1), 63 (1984)

    1984

  31. [39]

    Harko,Gravitational collapse of a Hagedorn fluid in Vaidya geometry, Phys

    T. Harko,Gravitational collapse of a Hagedorn fluid in Vaidya geometry, Phys. Rev. D 68, 064005 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    W. B. Bonnor and P. C. Vaidya,Spherically symmetric radiation of charge in Einstein-Maxwell theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. I, 2, 127 (1970)

    1970

  33. [41]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (1973)

    1973

  34. [42]

    Wang and Y

    A. Wang and Y. Wu,Generalized Vaidya Solutions, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 31, 107 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    R. L. Mallett,Radiating Vaidya metric imbedded in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D, 31(2), 416 (1985)

    1985

  36. [44]

    Chamorro, K

    A. Chamorro, K. S. Virbhadra,A radiating dyon solution, Pramana 45.2, 181 (1995)

    1995

  37. [45]

    R. L. Mallett,Metric of a rotating radiating charged mass in a de Sitter space, Phys. Lett. A, 126(4), 226 (1988)

    1988

  38. [46]

    Patino, H

    A. Patino, H. Rago,A radiating charge embedded in a De Sitter universe, Phys. Lett. A 121, 329 (1987)

    1987

  39. [47]

    Koberlein, R

    B. Koberlein, R. L. Mallet,Charged, radiating black holes, inflation, and cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5111 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    Saida, T

    H. Saida, T. Harada and H. Maeda,Black hole evaporation in an expanding universe, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 4711 (2007)

    2007

  41. [49]

    Husain,Exact solutions for null fluid collapse, Phys

    V. Husain,Exact solutions for null fluid collapse, Phys. Rev. D 53, R1759 (1996). 12

    1996

  42. [50]

    Heydarzade and F

    Y. Heydarzade and F. Darabi,Surrounded Vaidya solution by cosmological fields, Eur. Phys. J. C, 78, 582 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Heydarzade and F

    Y. Heydarzade and F. Darabi,Surrounded Vaidya black holes: apparent horizon properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 342 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Heydarzade and F

    Y. Heydarzade and F. Darabi,Surrounded Bonnor-Vaidya solution by cosmological fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1004 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    R. P. Kerr and A. Schild,Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equa- tions, Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. 17, 199 (1965); G. C. Debney, R. P. Kerr, and A. Schild,Solutions of the Einstein and Einstein-Maxwell Equations, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1842 (1969)

    1965

  46. [54]

    Gürses and F

    M. Gürses and F. Gürsey,Lorentz covariant treatment of the Kerr-Schild geometry, J. Math. Phys. 16, 2385 (1975)

    1975

  47. [55]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, 2nd Ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  48. [56]

    Gürses, T

    M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,AdS-plane wave and pp-wave solutions of generic gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124005 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Gürses, T

    M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,Anti-de Sitter-Wave Solutions of Higher Derivative Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 101101 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Güllü, M

    I. Güllü, M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,AdS Waves as Exact Solutions to Quadratic Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084015 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Gürses, T

    M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,New Exact Solutions of Quadratic Curvature Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 86, 024009 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Gürses, T

    M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,From Smooth Curves to Universal Metrics, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044042 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Gürses, T

    M. Gürses, T. C. Şişman, and B. Tekin,Kerr-Schild-Kundt Metrics are Universal, Class. Quantum Grav. 34, 075003 (2017). 13

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.