Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 55 references

Bosonization, BTZ Black Hole Microstates, and Logarithmic Correction to Entropy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the logarithmic correction to BTZ black hole entropy is exactly -1/2 under two different boundary Hamiltonians, and that this correction is one-loop exact.

desk verdict The relativistic-fermion side is rigorous and clean; the ColFT claim of a universal -1/2 log correction rests on an asserted Yang-Mills identification that needs a real derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02663 v1 pith:3PX5P4AQ submitted 2025-08-04 hep-th

Suvankar Dutta , Shruti Menon , Aayush Srivastav This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T4083C5781T13 PACS 04.70.Dy04.60.-m11.25.Tq11.15.-q
keywords BTZblackholeAdS3/CFTcorrespondencebosonizationcollectivefieldtheorymicrostateslogarithmicentropycorrectionYoungdiagrams2DYang-Mills
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the microstates of a BTZ black hole can be counted by a one-dimensional fermionic fluid on the boundary of AdS$_3$, and that the bulk thermodynamics follows from the fluid's quantum mechanics. Quantizing the collective-field description through bosonization produces states labeled by Young diagrams whose degeneracy reproduces the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. The same construction yields a canonical partition function that, for the collective-field Hamiltonian, takes the form of a chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills theory on a torus with $N \sim 1/(\beta G)$. From that partition function the paper derives a logarithmic correction to the entropy with coefficient $-1/2$ that comes entirely from the genus-one sector and is unchanged when the boundary Hamiltonian is replaced with a relativistic free-fermion Hamiltonian. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper gives a concrete boundary model in which both the leading entropy and the one-loop quantum correction can be computed explicitly.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the bosonization identity $:\psi^\dagger\psi:=\sqrt{c}\,\tilde p$, which converts the boundary Kac–Moody current into a fermion bilinear and builds the Hilbert space from particle–hole excitations above an $n$-particle ground state $|n\rangle$. These excitations are labeled by Young diagrams, with the number of boxes encoding the mass and angular momentum of the black hole. For the canonical ensemble, the partition-function sum in (6.5) is identified with the chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills partition function on a torus, with $N=|n|$ and area $\tilde A_\pm=2\beta_\pm/(cl)$, whose genus expansion supplies the leading and one-loop contributions to the free energy.

What would settle it

Compute the finite-$N$ version of the sum in (6.5) numerically for large but finite $|n_\pm|$ and extract the coefficient of $\log\beta$; a value different from $-1/2$ would show the chiral Yang–Mills identification receives subleading corrections. Alternatively, evaluate the next term in the small-area expansion of the ColFT free energy directly from the Young-diagram sum and compare it with the genus-expansion prediction, since a mismatch would indicate the all-genus leading term is not controlled by the two-dimensional Yang–Mills sector.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Euclidean canonical partition function of the BTZ black hole, computed with Kac–Moody boundary conditions determined by a collective-field boundary Hamiltonian, factorizes into two chiral sectors whose sums over Young diagrams reproduce the partition function of chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills theory on a torus, with rank $N\sim c/(\beta l)\sim 1/(\beta G)$. Using the known genus expansion of two-dimensional Yang–Mills, the paper shows that the leading free energy receives contributions of the same order from all genera, while the subleading logarithmic term comes only from the genus-one sector and has coefficient $-1/2$. For a second boundary Hamiltonian describing relativistic fermions, the partition function reduces to the generating function for integer partitions, and the same $-1/2$ logarithmic correction appears; the paper interprets this agreement as universality of the one-loop correction across boundary Hamiltonians. In the same framework, microstates of the black hole are particle–hole excitations of the fermionic system, labeled by Young diagrams, whose degeneracy matches the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation rests on identifying the boundary trace over bosonized fermion states with the Euclidean bulk path integral, and on treating the sum in (6.5) as exactly the chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills partition function; if either identification fails at subleading order, the coefficient of the logarithmic correction would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identification with chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills is exact, the full partition function of the BTZ black hole under these boundary conditions is known to arbitrary order in the genus expansion.
  • The degeneracy of Young diagrams with fixed box number reproduces the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, giving a microscopic count that is tied to a concrete fermionic Hilbert space rather than to an asymptotic Cardy-type formula.
  • The logarithmic correction has coefficient $-1/2$ and is one-loop exact, and it is the same for the collective-field and relativistic-fermion Hamiltonians, so it is a robust prediction of these Kac–Moody boundary conditions.
  • For the collective-field Hamiltonian the leading free energy includes contributions from all genera, which the paper interprets as additional saddle points in the bulk path integral that have not yet been identified.
  • For the relativistic-fermion Hamiltonian the free energy matches the standard BTZ free energy without extra saddles, isolating the effect of the boundary Hamiltonian on the classical thermodynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the chiral $U(N)$ Yang–Mills form suggests that the boundary partition function may admit a nonperturbative resummation using modular or topological-string techniques, going beyond the genus-by-genus treatment in the paper.
  • Editorial extension: because the $-1/2$ coefficient comes solely from the genus-one sector, a natural test is to compute the logarithmic correction for a third boundary Hamiltonian, such as an interacting fermionic Hamiltonian, and check whether the coefficient remains $-1/2$.
  • Editorial extension: the claim that all genera contribute at the same order at leading entropy implies the classical limit is not a single saddle; identifying the missing saddle points could connect these microstates to known families of Euclidean geometries in AdS$_3$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies asymptotically AdS3 gravity under non-standard boundary conditions in which the chemical potentials are determined dynamically by a chosen boundary Hamiltonian. Taking the boundary Hamiltonian to be the collective-field-theory (ColFT) Hamiltonian, the authors show that BTZ black holes correspond to constant-density, constant-velocity fluid configurations and fix the proportionality constants C± so that the bulk metric takes the standard BTZ form. Quantizing via bosonization of relativistic fermions, they construct a Hilbert space labeled by a U(1) charge n± and identify black-hole microstates with particle-hole excitations organized into Young diagrams; Hardy-Ramanujan counting of these diagrams reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy at leading order. The new results concern Euclidean canonical partition functions. For the ColFT Hamiltonian, the sector partition functions Z± are written as sums over Young diagrams, asserted to resemble the partition function of chiral U(N) Yang-Mills theory on a torus with N±=|n±|, and expanded in a genus expansion; the paper claims the leading free energy receives contributions from all genera (with the higher-genus part left as an unevaluated sum), while the logarithmic correction comes solely from the genus-one term and is one-loop exact with coefficient −1/2.

Significance. The paper contains several solid and useful ingredients. The microcanonical counting of Section 5.4 is explicit and checkable: the map |R±|=(c/2)(Ml±J) together with the Hardy-Ramanujan estimate gives exactly S=π²l²/(2G)(1/β+ + 1/β−), a nontrivial consistency check between the Young-diagram Hilbert space and the Bekenstein-Hawking formula. The relativistic-channel computation in Section 6.2 is the strongest part: the identity Z±=Π_{k≥1}(1−e^{−µ±k})^{−1} is exact, and the modular transform of the Dedekind eta function delivers the coefficient −1/2 without uncontrolled approximation. This gives a concrete, falsifiable prediction distinguishing these Kac-Moody-type boundary conditions from the Cardy/Carlip −3/2 scenario. If the identification of the ColFT representation sum with chiral U(N) Yang-Mills theory can be made exact, the paper would establish a new bridge between BTZ microstates and the 2D Yang-Mills/topological-string genus expansion. As it stands, the ColFT channel is a plausible conjecture that is consistent with, but not independently established by, the rigorous relativistic-channel result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.1, Eqs. (6.5)-(6.6), footnote 4] The claim that the ColFT-channel logarithmic correction is one-loop exact with coefficient −1/2 rests on identifying the sum (6.5) with the partition function of chiral U(N) Yang-Mills theory on a torus, but this identification is asserted rather than derived. The passage from (6.5) to (6.6) replaces the coefficient (2|n±|±1) by 2|n±|, thereby dropping a term ±|R±| of relative order 1/|n±| in the exponent, and imposes a cutoff i<|n±| on the row sum that is not present in the Hilbert-space trace. The dropped term is not negligible: at the saddle point of the representation sum one has |R±| ~ π²/(6ñ²) and N±Ã±=2π/√3, so the omitted term contributes an O(1) amount to the exponent. In addition, the matching of rank and area is not stated precisely (the coefficient of |R±| in (6.6) differs by a factor of 2 from the standard U(N) quadratic-Casimir expression, which would require a compensating rescaling of ñ), and the genus expansion quoted from Refs. [52-54] is applied in the regime ñ→0 with N±Ã± fixed rather than in the fixed-area large-N limit in which it is normally derived. Since the asserted one-loop exactness of the −1/2 coefficient is precisely what is at stake, the authors should either prove that (6.6) is exactly the chiral U(N) amplitude (with the correct rank, area, and row cutoff) or provide a controlled estimate showing that the O(1/N) modifications and the cutoff do not affect the coefficient of log ñ in F1.
  2. [Section 6.1, Eqs. (6.13)-(6.15)] For the ColFT Hamiltonian the leading-order free energy is not actually computed. Equation (6.14) expresses F± as the genus-one term π²/(3ñ) plus an infinite sum over genus g≥2 whose coefficients c_g are not known and whose convergence is not established, as the authors themselves acknowledge. The claim that the genus-one part reproduces the BTZ free energy while the remainder represents additional saddle points is therefore a conjecture: if the remainder is non-zero, the leading-order free energy (and hence the leading entropy) would not match the Bekenstein-Hawking value. The abstract's statement that the leading entropy term receives contributions from all genera is a structural statement consistent with Eq. (6.11), but it should be accompanied by an explicit statement that the quantitative value of the leading term, and in particular the BTZ matching, remains an open problem for the ColFT case. This caveat does not affect the logarithmic coefficient itself, since the higher-genus terms carry no logarithm.
  3. [Section 6.1, Eqs. (6.1)-(6.3)] The canonical partition function is posited as Z=Tr exp(−β+H+−β−H−) over the bosonized boundary Hilbert space, and its equivalence to the Euclidean bulk Chern-Simons path integral under the ColFT boundary conditions is not derived. The paper shows only the classical equivalence between −βM+βΩJ and −β+H+−β−H−; the quantum measure, including the representation sum and the background subtraction that fixes n± through Eq. (6.2), is assumed. Because logarithmic corrections are sensitive to measure factors (a missing β±-dependent normalization of the trace could change the log coefficient), the paper should state explicitly whether (6.1) is intended as a definition of the quantum boundary theory or as a derived statement, and in the latter case indicate the derivation or its limitations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5.3 and Acknowledgments] There is a duplicated phrase 'In in our analysis', and the acknowledgments sentence should read 'We thank Nabamita Banerjee and Ranveer Singh for useful discussions'.
  2. [Equation (6.4)] The notation l±i is confusing because l_i already carries the row index i; a notation such as l_i^{(±)} would make the two chiral sectors easier to follow.
  3. [Appendix B, last displayed formula] The factor e^{−t/24} uses an undefined variable t and should read e^{−µ/24}.
  4. [Equations (6.16) and (6.24)] The equivalence of the intermediate form (1/2) ln(β+β−/(c²l²)) with the final form −(1/2) ln(9l⁴/(4G²β²(1−l²Ω²))) uses β+β−=β²(1−l²Ω²) and c=3l/(2G); these substitutions should be stated explicitly in the text.
  5. [Section 5.4] The Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotics includes a prefactor 1/(4√3 n) that would contribute −(1/2) log n to the microcanonical entropy; since this has the same coefficient as the canonical result, a remark on the consistency (or a definition of the precision at which the microcanonical match is claimed) would be helpful.
  6. [Section 7] The statement that the degeneracy of these states 'exactly reproduces the classical Bekenstein-Hawking entropy' is too strong in view of the leading-order Hardy-Ramanujan estimate; 'reproduces at leading order' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the logarithmic coefficient -1/2 is obtained from the derived partition function via standard external asymptotics, with no fitted parameter entering the entropy.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity. The classical BTZ data (β±) fix the ground-state labels n± via (6.2) and the Hamiltonian normalizations C± via (4.10); no parameter is fitted to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The microcanonical degeneracy (5.53)-(5.54) is the Hardy-Ramanujan partition count applied to the box numbers |R±| set by the semiclassical expectation values (5.47) and (5.51), and the match to (4.20) is a genuine result rather than an input. The canonical partition functions (6.5) and (6.19) are obtained by summing the derived eigenvalues (5.44)-(5.45) and (6.18), after subtracting the background term g2(n). The coefficient -1/2 is then extracted from the small-area expansion of the genus-one free energy (6.12) and from the modular transformation of the Dedekind eta function in Appendix B; these are external, standard mathematical results, not restatements of the target claim. The 'closely resembles' identification of (6.6) with chiral U(N) Yang-Mills is an approximation and possible correctness concern, not a circularity: it is explicitly flagged as an assumption (|n±|≫1) and the same logarithmic coefficient is independently reproduced from the relativistic-fermion Hamiltonian (6.22)-(6.24), which is a direct generating-function computation. The self-references to [18], [21], and [49] supply input constructions or background, but the load-bearing coefficient is cross-checked by an independent fermion calculation and by external Yang-Mills and eta-function results.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the non-standard boundary condition framework, the choice of the ColFT Hamiltonian, the bosonization dictionary, and the identification of the partition function with 2D Yang-Mills. None of these are fitted to the entropy; they are structural assumptions of the model. The two proportionality constants C± are normalization choices fixed by the standard metric form.

free parameters (2)
  • Proportionality constants C± in the ColFT Hamiltonian = beta±/(pi l^2)
    Introduced in (4.1) and fixed in (A.5) by requiring the bulk metric to take the standard BTZ form; a normalization choice that does not affect entropy or the log-correction coefficient.
  • Proportionality constants C± in the relativistic Hamiltonian = ±1/l
    Introduced in (4.19) and fixed in (A.10) for the same reason as above.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math AdS3 gravity is described by two copies of SL(2,R) Chern-Simons theory with level k=l/(4G).
    Section 2 uses this standard equivalence without derivation.
  • domain assumption The chemical potentials xi± may be dynamical and field-dependent, defined via (2.13).
    Section 2.1 adopts this class of non-standard boundary conditions from [8,18]; it is the framework the whole paper lives in.
  • domain assumption The boundary Hamiltonian realizing these boundary conditions is the collective field theory Hamiltonian of Jevicki-Sakita (3.1).
    Section 3 adopts this Hamiltonian; alternative Hamiltonians are possible and the paper explores one (relativistic fermions).
  • standard math Bosonization of relativistic Dirac fermions provides a faithful representation of the Kac-Moody algebra (5.15), and the fermionic Fock space is the Hilbert space of the theory.
    Section 5.1 invokes standard bosonization identities (5.12)-(5.20); the identification with gravity microstates is the paper's physical interpretation.
  • domain assumption The sum over Young diagrams in (6.5) equals the chiral U(N) Yang-Mills partition function on a torus with N=|n±|.
    Section 6.1 states this resemblance and then imports the genus expansion results of [52-54] without proving the equality.
  • standard math The Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotic formula for partitions applies in the large-|R| limit.
    Used in (5.53) to obtain the microcanonical entropy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bosonization, BTZ Black Hole Microstates, and Logarithmic Correction to Entropy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PX5P4AQ

@misc{pith2026250802663,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bosonization, BTZ Black Hole Microstates, and Logarithmic Correction to Entropy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PX5P4AQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02663}
}
read the original abstract

We study three-dimensional gravity with negative cosmological constant under non-standard boundary conditions where chemical potentials are determined dynamically. Using a boundary Hamiltonian inspired by collective field theory (ColFT), the boundary dynamics reduce to those of a one-dimensional fluid on a circle, with configurations corresponding to bulk geometries such as BTZ black holes. Quantizing the system via bosonization of relativistic fermions, we obtain a microscopic description of black hole states in terms of Young diagrams, whose degeneracies match the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. We compute the Euclidean canonical partition function and free energy for both the ColFT Hamiltonian and a relativistic free-fermion Hamiltonian. In the ColFT case, the partition function resembles that of chiral U(N) Yang-Mills theory on a torus, with N~1/(\beta G). This offers a novel way to compute quantum corrections to the partition function. The leading entropy term receives contributions from all genera, while the subleading logarithmic correction is one-loop exact, arising solely from the genus-one sector with coefficient -1/2 . This coefficient remains unchanged in the relativistic fermion case, suggesting the universality of the one-loop correction across different boundary Hamiltonians.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.02663 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Absolute ground state |0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Bosonisation and BTZ Black Hole Microstates

    S. Dutta, S. Menon, and A. Srivastav, “Bosonisation and BTZ Black Hole Mi- crostates,” 2 2025, 2502.19322

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [28]

    Horizon fluff, semi-classical black hole microstates — Log-corrections to BTZ entropy and black hole/particle correspondence,

    H. Afshar, D. Grumiller, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and H. Yavartanoo, “Horizon fluff, semi-classical black hole microstates — Log-corrections to BTZ entropy and black hole/particle correspondence,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 087, 2017, 1705.06257

    arXiv 2017

  3. [1]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 104, pp. 207–226, 1986

    1986

  4. [2]

    Chemical potentials in three- dimensional higher spin anti-de Sitter gravity,

    M. Henneaux, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Chemical potentials in three- dimensional higher spin anti-de Sitter gravity,”JHEP, vol. 12, p. 048, 2013, 1309.4362

    arXiv 2013

  5. [3]

    Generalized Black Holes in Three-dimensional Spacetime,

    C. Bunster, M. Henneaux, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Generalized Black Holes in Three-dimensional Spacetime,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 031, 2014, 1404.3305

    arXiv 2014

  6. [4]

    Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy,

    A. P´ erez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 103, 2016, 1605.04490

    arXiv 2016

  7. [5]

    Higher spin gravity in 3D: Black holes, global charges and thermodynamics,

    A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Higher spin gravity in 3D: Black holes, global charges and thermodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 726, pp. 444–449, 2013, 1207.2844

    arXiv 2013

  8. [6]

    Soft Heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions,

    H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Tron- coso, “Soft Heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 10, p. 101503, 2016, 1603.04824

    arXiv 2016

Show all 55 references
  1. [7]

    Most general AdS 3 boundary conditions,

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, “Most general AdS 3 boundary conditions,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 023, 2016, 1608.01308

    2016 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Higher Spin Black Holes with Soft Hair,

    D. Grumiller, A. Perez, S. Prohazka, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Higher Spin Black Holes with Soft Hair,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 119, 2016, 1607.05360

    2016 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes,

    D. Grumiller and W. Merbis, “Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes,” SciPost Phys. , vol. 8, no. 1, p. 010, 2020, 1906.10694. 33

    2020 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Soft hairy horizons in three spacetime dimensions,

    H. Afshar, D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Soft hairy horizons in three spacetime dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 95, no. 10, p. 106005, 2017, 1611.09783

    2017 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Spin-3 Gravity in Three-Dimensional Flat Space,

    H. Afshar, A. Bagchi, R. Fareghbal, D. Grumiller, and J. Rosseel, “Spin-3 Gravity in Three-Dimensional Flat Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 111, no. 12, p. 121603, 2013, 1307.4768

    2013 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Enhanced asymptotic symmetry algebra of AdS3,

    C. Troessaert, “Enhanced asymptotic symmetry algebra of AdS3,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 044, 2013, 1303.3296

    2013 arXiv

  7. [13]

    An sl(2, R) current algebra from AdS3 gravity,

    S. G. Avery, R. R. Poojary, and N. V. Suryanarayana, “An sl(2, R) current algebra from AdS3 gravity,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 144, 2014, 1304.4252

    2014 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Higher-Spin Flat Space Cosmologies with Soft Hair,

    M. Ammon, D. Grumiller, S. Prohazka, M. Riegler, and R. Wutte, “Higher-Spin Flat Space Cosmologies with Soft Hair,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 031, 2017, 1703.02594

    2017 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Exploring new boundary conditions forN = (1, 1) extended higher-spin AdS3 supergravity,

    H. T. ¨Ozer and A. Filiz, “Exploring new boundary conditions forN = (1, 1) extended higher-spin AdS3 supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 80, no. 11, p. 1072, 2020, 1907.06104

    2020 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS 3,

    H. A. Gonz´ alez, J. Matulich, M. Pino, and R. Troncoso, “Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS 3,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 115, 2018, 1809.02749

    2018 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Asymptotic sym- metries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger, and S. Theisen, “Asymptotic sym- metries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 007, 2010, 1008.4744

    2010 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Higher-spin gravity in AdS3 and folds on Fermi surface,

    S. Dutta, D. Mukherjee, and S. Parihar, “Higher-spin gravity in AdS3 and folds on Fermi surface,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 107, no. 10, p. 106010, 2023, 2302.08471

    2023 arXiv

  13. [19]

    The quantum collective field method and its application to the planar limit,

    A. Jevicki and B. Sakita, “The quantum collective field method and its application to the planar limit,” Nuclear Physics B , vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 511 – 527, 1980

    1980

  14. [20]

    Collective field approach to the large- N limit: Euclidean field theories,

    A. Jevicki and B. Sakita, “Collective field approach to the large- N limit: Euclidean field theories,” Nuclear Physics B , vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 89 – 100, 1981

    1981

  15. [22]

    Asymptotic W-symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories,

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, and S. Pfenninger, “Asymptotic W-symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 113, 2011, 1107.0290

    2011 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,

    M. Banados, “Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 484, no. 1, pp. 147–169, 1999, hep-th/9901148

    1999 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Role of surface integrals in the hamiltonian formulation 34 of general relativity,

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the hamiltonian formulation 34 of general relativity,” Annals of Physics , vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 286–318, 1974

    1974

  18. [25]

    Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Banados, “Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 52, pp. 5816–5825, 1996, hep-th/9405171

    1996 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Classical integrability and higher symmetries of collective string field theory,

    J. Avan and A. Jevicki, “Classical integrability and higher symmetries of collective string field theory,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 266, pp. 35–41, 1991

    1991

  20. [27]

    Quantum integrability and exact eigenstates of the collective string field theory,

    J. Avan and A. Jevicki, “Quantum integrability and exact eigenstates of the collective string field theory,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 272, pp. 17–24, 1991

    1991

  21. [29]

    Near horizon soft hair as mi- crostates of three dimensional black holes,

    H. Afshar, D. Grumiller, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Near horizon soft hair as mi- crostates of three dimensional black holes,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 96, no. 8, p. 084032, 2017, 1607.00009

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Horizon Fluffs: Near Horizon Soft Hairs as Microstates of Generic AdS3 Black Holes,

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and H. Yavartanoo, “Horizon Fluffs: Near Horizon Soft Hairs as Microstates of Generic AdS3 Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 95, no. 4, p. 044007, 2017, 1608.01293

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Interacting theory of collective and topological fields in two-dimensions,

    J. Avan and A. Jevicki, “Interacting theory of collective and topological fields in two-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 397, pp. 672–704, 1993, hep-th/9209036

    1993 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nonrelativistic fermions, coadjoint orbits of W∞ and string field theory atc = 1,

    A. Dhar, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, “Nonrelativistic fermions, coadjoint orbits of W∞ and string field theory atc = 1,” Mod. Phys. Lett., vol. A7, pp. 3129–3146, 1992, hep-th/9207011

    1992 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bosonization of non-relativistic fermions in 2-dimensions and collective field theory,

    A. Dhar, “Bosonization of non-relativistic fermions in 2-dimensions and collective field theory,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 064, 2005, hep-th/0505084

    2005 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Folds, bosonization and nontriviality of the classical limit of 2-D string theory,

    S. R. Das and S. D. Mathur, “Folds, bosonization and nontriviality of the classical limit of 2-D string theory,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 365, pp. 79–86, 1996, hep-th/9507141

    1996 arXiv

  27. [35]

    D-branes in 2-d string theory and classical limits,

    S. R. Das, “D-branes in 2-d string theory and classical limits,” in 3rd Interna- tional Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries , pp. 218–233, 1 2004, hep- th/0401067

    2004

  28. [36]

    An Introduction to bosonization and some of its applications,

    S. Rao and D. Sen, “An Introduction to bosonization and some of its applications,” 5 2000, cond-mat/0005492

    2000 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Introduction to bosonization,

    E. Miranda, “Introduction to bosonization,” Braz. J. Phys. , vol. 33, pp. 3–35, 2003

    2003

  30. [38]

    Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting 35 spinless Fermi gas,

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting 35 spinless Fermi gas,” J. Phys. C , vol. 14, pp. 2585–2609, 1981

    1981

  31. [39]

    Lectures on 2d yang–mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories,

    S. Cordes, G. W. Moore, and S. Ramgoolam, “Lectures on 2d yang–mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories,” in Proceedings of the In- ternational Congress of Mathematicians (ICM94) , pp. 184–244, 1995. arXiv:hep- th/9411210, YCTP-P11-94

    1995

  32. [40]

    Lectures on 2-d Yang-Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories,

    S. Cordes, G. W. Moore, and S. Ramgoolam, “Lectures on 2-d Yang-Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , vol. 41, pp. 184–244, 1995, hep-th/9411210

    1995 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions,

    A. Sen, “Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 156, 2013, 1205.0971

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,

    S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 17, pp. 4175–4186, 2000, gr-qc/0005017

    2000 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy and AdS / CFT correspondence,

    S. Mukherji and S. S. Pal, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy and AdS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 026, 2002, hep-th/0205164

    2002 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Two-dimensional QCD as a string theory,

    D. J. Gross, “Two-dimensional QCD as a string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 400, pp. 161–180, 1993, hep-th/9212149

    1993 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Two-dimensional QCD is a string theory,

    D. J. Gross and W. Taylor, “Two-dimensional QCD is a string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 400, pp. 181–208, 1993, hep-th/9301068

    1993 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Twists and Wilson loops in the string theory of two- dimensional QCD,

    D. J. Gross and W. Taylor, “Twists and Wilson loops in the string theory of two- dimensional QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 403, pp. 395–452, 1993, hep-th/9303046

    1993 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Multicolor qcd as dual resonance theory,

    A. A. Migdal, “Multicolor qcd as dual resonance theory,”Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., vol. 69, p. 810, 1975. [Sov. Phys. JETP 42 (1976) 413]

    1976

  40. [48]

    Loop averages and partition functions in u(n) gauge theory on two- dimensional manifolds,

    B. Y. Rusakov, “Loop averages and partition functions in u(n) gauge theory on two- dimensional manifolds,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A , vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 693–703, 1990

    1990

  41. [49]

    From 2d droplets to 2d Yang-Mills,

    A. Chattopadhyay, S. Dutta, D. Mukherjee, and Neetu, “From 2d droplets to 2d Yang-Mills,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 974, p. 115648, 2022, 2010.11923

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Large N 2-D Yang-Mills theory and topological string theory,

    S. Cordes, G. W. Moore, and S. Ramgoolam, “Large N 2-D Yang-Mills theory and topological string theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 185, pp. 543–619, 1997, hep- th/9402107

    1997

  43. [51]

    Comment on two-dimensional O(N) and Sp(N) Yang-Mills theories as string theories,

    S. Ramgoolam, “Comment on two-dimensional O(N) and Sp(N) Yang-Mills theories as string theories,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 418, pp. 30–44, 1994, hep-th/9307085

    1994 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Resurgence analysis of 2d Yang-Mills theory on a torus,

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, “Resurgence analysis of 2d Yang-Mills theory on a torus,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 065, 2018, 1806.00189. 36

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    The String partition function for QCD on the torus,

    R. E. Rudd, “The String partition function for QCD on the torus,” 7 1994, hep- th/9407176

    1994

  46. [54]

    Conformal field theory techniques in large N Yang-Mills theory,

    M. R. Douglas, “Conformal field theory techniques in large N Yang-Mills theory,” in NATO Advanced Research Workshop on New Developments in String Theory, Conformal Models and Topological Field Theory , 5 1993, hep-th/9311130

    1993 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Holomorphic anomaly of 2d Yang-Mills theory on a torus revisited,

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, “Holomorphic anomaly of 2d Yang-Mills theory on a torus revisited,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 025, 2019, 1903.10510. 37

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.