Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 74 references

Adaptive Sparse Softmax: An Effective and Efficient Softmax Variant

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that replacing softmax with an adaptive sparse variant, which masks classes far below the gold score during training, improves accuracy and adds about 1.2x training speedup across classification tasks with 5 to 5,000+…

desk verdict The submission is unverifiable as-is: the abstract advertises AS-Softmax but the body is an unrelated chart-captioning paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03175 v1 pith:KRBQTWSJ submitted 2025-08-05 cs.LG

Qi Lv , Lei Geng , Ziqiang Cao , Min Cao , Sujian Li , Wenjie Li , Guohong Fu This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords adaptivesparsesoftmaxvariantclassificationcross-entropylossclassmaskinggradientaccumulationtrainingspeedupoverfitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes Adaptive Sparse Softmax (AS-Softmax), a drop-in replacement for softmax in neural classification. Its diagnosis is that softmax's training goal, driving the gold class probability toward an unreachable 1, mismatches the test goal, which only requires the gold class to have the highest score, so training continues on easy samples and can overfit. AS-Softmax is designed to mask classes whose scores are far below the gold class during training, letting the model focus on the strong competitors that actually matter at test time. The abstract reports that AS-Softmax consistently outperforms softmax and its variants on text multi-class, text multi-label, token classification, image classification, and audio classification with class sizes from 5 to 5,000+, and that an adaptive gradient accumulation schedule gives about 1.2x training speedup.

What carries the argument

The central object is the AS-Softmax transformation: a sparse, test-matching variant built on top of softmax that zeros out classes with scores far below the actual class during training. It is paired with an adaptive gradient accumulation schedule driven by the masked sample ratio. The transformation carries the argument by converting the training objective from 'make the gold score approach 1' to 'beat the surviving competitors,' which is the same comparison the test makes; the accumulation schedule turns the resulting zero-loss easy samples into compute savings.

What would settle it

Run AS-Softmax on one of the claimed text multi-class tasks with, say, 100 or more classes, comparing against softmax under identical architecture, hyperparameters, and compute budget: if the masked variant does not beat softmax on validation accuracy, or if its advantage disappears when the masking margin is tuned independently for each class count, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a test-matching sparse transformation of softmax improves both accuracy and efficiency. Under softmax, the target class probability can never equal 1, so the model is always pushed to keep learning all samples, including those already classified correctly; AS-Softmax instead discards, for each sample, the classes whose scores fall far below the true class, so training concentrates on separating the target from plausible rivals. Because easy samples eventually have no surviving rivals, their losses drop to zero, and an adaptive gradient accumulation strategy based on the masked sample ratio exploits this to accelerate training. The paper asserts that the resulting method outperforms softmax and existing variants consistently across five task families, and that its validation loss tracks classification performance.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that masking classes whose scores fall far below the gold class preserves the gradient information needed to learn correct decision boundaries; if that fails, any gains are an artifact of the masking threshold rather than a better match to the test objective. This premise cannot be examined in the submitted manuscript, because the body does not contain the AS-Softmax definition or experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A classifier trained with AS-Softmax can use the same architecture and simply replace softmax, gaining accuracy across class sizes from 5 to more than 5,000.
  • Training time can be reduced by roughly 1.2x without losing effectiveness, because easy samples with no surviving competitors no longer contribute gradient updates.
  • AS-Softmax validation loss should be a more reliable indicator of classification performance than softmax loss, making it useful for early stopping and model selection.
  • The method is claimed to work across text multi-class, text multi-label, token classification, image classification, and audio classification, implying the benefit is not tied to one modality.
  • The automatic drop of easy-sample losses means training effort shifts toward hard decision boundaries, which is where test errors actually occur.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer that the masking margin will need to scale with class count: a threshold sensible for 5 classes may be too aggressive for 5,000 classes, where even the correct class receives a small probability. The abstract reports gains across that range but does not state whether the margin was re-tuned per task.
  • I infer that if AS-Softmax loss indeed tracks validation performance, the same masked-ratio signal could be reused as a data-filtering or curriculum tool, skipping easy samples before they reach the optimizer.
  • The submitted full text is an unrelated chart-captioning manuscript, so the abstract's definition, derivation, and experiments for AS-Softmax are not present in the body I can inspect; my reading of the method therefore rests entirely on the abstract.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract announces Adaptive Sparse Softmax (AS-Softmax), a softmax variant with a test-matching transformation, adaptive masking of low-scoring classes, and an adaptive gradient accumulation schedule, and it claims consistent accuracy improvements over softmax and its variants on text multi-class, text multi-label, token classification, image classification, and audio classification tasks with class sizes from 5 to 5000+, plus a 1.2x training speedup. The full text, however, is an entirely different paper, 'CHART CAP: Mitigating Hallucination of Dense Chart Captioning' (self-identified as arXiv:2508.03164v1), which contains no mention of AS-Softmax, no definition or derivation of the proposed transformation, no masking threshold, no adaptive accumulation rule, and no classification experiments. The submitted artifact is internally inconsistent: the abstract advertises one paper and the body delivers another.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were substantiated, AS-Softmax would be a significant drop-in softmax replacement with broad applicability across modalities and class-count regimes. The proposed motivation—that the unreachable gold-class target under softmax causes overfitting and inefficient training while the test objective only requires the gold class to have the maximum score—is plausible and worth investigating. However, none of these claims can be assessed from the submitted manuscript because the body contains no method description, no equations, no ablation, no baseline comparisons, and no error bars for the claimed results. The one apparently machine-checkable or reproducible component, the ChartCap dataset and Visual Consistency Score, belongs to a different paper and does not bear on the abstract's central claim. As submitted, the manuscript makes no verifiable scientific contribution on AS-Softmax.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. full text] The abstract announces Adaptive Sparse Softmax (AS-Softmax) and its training/test objective-matching logic, but the full text is a different paper, 'CHART CAP: Mitigating Hallucination of Dense Chart Captioning' (arXiv:2508.03164v1), with no occurrence of the term 'AS-Softmax', no definition of the transformation, no masking threshold, no derivation of the loss, and no algorithm statement. Since the central method is absent, the manuscript cannot be evaluated on its stated claims; no section, equation, or table provides the promised content.
  2. [Experimental sections (Tables 2–5, Figures 4–7)] The abstract claims consistent improvements over softmax and its variants on text multi-class, text multi-label, token classification, image classification, and audio classification with class sizes from 5 to 5000+. The body contains no classification experiments, no baseline tables for softmax variants, no accuracy numbers, and no error bars; the only experiments concern chart captioning. Therefore the central empirical claim is completely unsupported in the submitted artifact.
  3. [Abstract] The claims of a 'remarkable' correlation between AS-Softmax loss and validation classification performance, and a 1.2x training speedup from adaptive gradient accumulation, are asserted without any supporting figure, table, or derivation in the manuscript. The masked-ratio gradient accumulation schedule is not described anywhere, leaving both the accuracy and efficiency claims unfalsifiable as submitted.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title page and header] The body carries its own title, abstract, author list, and acknowledgments that are unrelated to the abstract; the arXiv identifier in the header (2508.03164v1) does not match the submission number (2508.03175), so the artifact appears to concatenate two different papers.
  2. [Section 3.4 and appendices] Several formulas are typeset incompletely (for example, the Visual Consistency Score equation in Section 3.4 ends with 'Sim' and missing terms), and some appendix tables and figures are garbled, making the body hard to parse even on its own terms.
  3. [Conclusion] The conclusion's stated limitation concerns the chart-type schema, which is relevant to the ChartCap paper, not to the AS-Softmax claim; the manuscript never states limitations of AS-Softmax, such as sensitivity of the masking margin or the transfer of the margin across class counts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be identified because the manuscript body contains no derivation, equations, or experiments for AS-Softmax; the abstract's claims are unverifiable rather than circular.

full rationale

The submitted artifact's abstract describes AS-Softmax, but the full text is an unrelated chart-captioning paper (CHART CAP), containing no definition, derivation, algorithmic details, hyperparameters, or experimental results for AS-Softmax. Consequently, there is no derivation chain to audit and no equation or fitted parameter for which a circular reduction could be exhibited. The abstract's phrase 'test-matching transformation' and the later claim that 'the loss of AS-Softmax is remarkably correlated with classification performance in validation' are suggestive of a possible self-definitional relationship, but without the actual loss formula or transformation, this cannot be established as a concrete circularity under the requirement to quote a specific reduction. The absence of any supporting content is a serious completeness and correctness problem — the central claims are unverifiable as submitted — but it is not a demonstrated circularity. Under the hard rule that circularity claims require quotable evidence of reduction to inputs, no such evidence exists here, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity with a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

For the claimed AS-Softmax paper, only the abstract is present; the full text is an unrelated paper. The ledger records the abstract's implicit tuning choices and domain assumptions. No invented entities: the method introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (2)
  • masking margin threshold
    The method discards classes with 'far smaller scores' than the true class; this requires a margin or threshold. The abstract does not state its value or how it was set for tasks with class sizes from 5 to 5000+.
  • masked-ratio gradient accumulation schedule
    The adaptive gradient accumulation strategy is keyed to the masked sample ratio; the scheduling rule and any thresholds are unspecified in the abstract.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Softmax's unreachable unit target for the gold class causes overfitting and wasted training on easy samples
    The abstract states the unreachable unit target causes the training to 'continue forever and lead to overfitting'; this claim about optimization dynamics is asserted, not demonstrated, and the provided body does not address it.
  • domain assumption Masking classes whose scores fall far below the true class during training preserves the gradient signal needed to learn correct decision boundaries
    The method's correctness depends on the premise that discarded classes' gradients are unnecessary for the final decision boundary; this is not shown in the artifact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adaptive Sparse Softmax: An Effective and Efficient Softmax Variant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KRBQTWSJ

@misc{pith2026250803175,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adaptive Sparse Softmax: An Effective and Efficient Softmax Variant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KRBQTWSJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03175}
}
read the original abstract

Softmax with the cross entropy loss is the standard configuration for current neural classification models. The gold score for a target class is supposed to be 1, but it is never reachable under the softmax schema. Such a problem makes the training process continue forever and leads to overfitting. Moreover, the "target-approach-1" training goal forces the model to continuously learn all samples, leading to a waste of time in handling some samples which have already been classified correctly with high confidence, while the test goal simply requires the target class of each sample to hold the maximum score. To solve the above weaknesses, we propose the Adaptive Sparse softmax (AS-Softmax) which designs a reasonable and test-matching transformation on top of softmax. For more purposeful learning, we discard the classes with far smaller scores compared with the actual class during training. Then the model could focus on learning to distinguish the target class from its strong opponents, which is also the great challenge in test. In addition, since the training losses of easy samples will gradually drop to 0 in AS-Softmax, we develop an adaptive gradient accumulation strategy based on the masked sample ratio to speed up training. We verify the proposed AS-Softmax on a variety of text multi-class, text multi-label, text token classification, image classification and audio classification tasks with class sizes ranging from 5 to 5000+. The results show that AS-Softmax consistently outperforms softmax and its variants, and the loss of AS-Softmax is remarkably correlated with classification performance in validation. Furthermore, adaptive gradient accumulation strategy can bring about 1.2x training speedup comparing with the standard softmax while maintaining classification effectiveness.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phi-3 technical report: A highly capable language model locally on your phone

    Marah Abdin, Jyoti Aneja, Hany Awadalla, Ahmed Awadal- lah, Ammar Ahmad Awan, Nguyen Bach, Amit Bahree, Arash Bakhtiari, Jianmin Bao, Harkirat Behl, et al. Phi-3 technical report: A highly capable language model locally on your phone. ArXiv preprint, abs/2404.14219, 2024. 2, 6

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Chartcheck: Explainable fact-checking over real-world chart images

    Mubashara Akhtar, Nikesh Subedi, Vivek Gupta, Sahar Tah- masebi, Oana Cocarascu, and Elena Simperl. Chartcheck: Explainable fact-checking over real-world chart images. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, pages 13921–13937, 2024. 1, 3

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Estimation of the timing of human visual perception from magnetoen- cephalography

    Kaoru Amano, Naokazu Goda, Shin’ya Nishida, Yoshimichi Ejima, Tsunehiro Takeda, and Yoshio Ohtani. Estimation of the timing of human visual perception from magnetoen- cephalography. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(15):3981–3991,

    work page

  4. [4]

    Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnet, 2024

    Anthropic. Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnet, 2024. 2, 6

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    METEOR: An auto- matic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments

    Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. METEOR: An auto- matic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. InProceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pages 65–72, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics. 3, 6

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Hartmann

    Bernd Burghardt and Alexander K. Hartmann. Rna sec- ondary structure design. Physical Review E , 75(2), 2007. 2

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Infor- mation graphics: an untapped resource for digital libraries

    Sandra Carberry, Stephanie Elzer, and Seniz Demir. Infor- mation graphics: an untapped resource for digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information re- trieval, pages 581–588, 2006. 1

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test- time scaling

    Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Yue Cao, Yangzhou Liu, Zhang- wei Gao, Erfei Cui, Jinguo Zhu, Shenglong Ye, Hao Tian, Zhaoyang Liu, et al. Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test- time scaling. ArXiv preprint, abs/2412.05271, 2024. 2, 4, 6

    arXiv 2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    The elements of graphing data

    William S Cleveland. The elements of graphing data . Wadsworth Publ. Co., 1985. 1

    1985

  2. [10]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Fei-Fei Li. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009), 20- 25 June 2009, Miami, Florida, USA , pages 248–255. I...

    2009

  3. [11]

    Detecting and preventing hallucinations in large vision language models

    Anisha Gunjal, Jihan Yin, and Erhan Bas. Detecting and preventing hallucinations in large vision language models. In Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2024, Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applica- tions of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2024,...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Chartllama: A mul- timodal llm for chart understanding and generation

    Yucheng Han, Chi Zhang, Xin Chen, Xu Yang, Zhibin Wang, Gang Yu, Bin Fu, and Hanwang Zhang. Chartllama: A mul- timodal llm for chart understanding and generation. ArXiv preprint, abs/2311.16483, 2023. 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    CLIPScore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. CLIPScore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing, pages 7514–7528, Online and Punta Cana, Do...

    2021

  6. [14]

    SciCap: Generating captions for scientific figures

    Ting-Yao Hsu, C Lee Giles, and Ting-Hao Huang. SciCap: Generating captions for scientific figures. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 , pages 3258–3264, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1, 3

    2021

  7. [15]

    Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen

    Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Represen- tations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022....

    2022

  8. [16]

    Ciem: Contrastive instruction evaluation method for better instruction tuning

    Hongyu Hu, Jiyuan Zhang, Minyi Zhao, and Zhenbang Sun. Ciem: Contrastive instruction evaluation method for better instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2309.02301, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Do lvlms understand charts? analyzing and correcting factual errors in chart captioning

    Kung-Hsiang Huang, Mingyang Zhou, Hou Pong Chan, Yi R Fung, Zhenhailong Wang, Lingyu Zhang, Shih-Fu Chang, and Heng Ji. Do lvlms understand charts? analyzing and correcting factual errors in chart captioning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2312.10160, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hallucination augmented contrastive learn- ing for multimodal large language model

    Chaoya Jiang, Haiyang Xu, Mengfan Dong, Jiaxing Chen, Wei Ye, Ming Yan, Qinghao Ye, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang, and Shikun Zhang. Hallucination augmented contrastive learn- ing for multimodal large language model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Swe- 9 bench: Can language models resolve real-world github is- sues? ArXiv preprint, abs/2310.06770, 2023

    Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. Swe- 9 bench: Can language models resolve real-world github is- sues? ArXiv preprint, abs/2310.06770, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Chart-to-text: A large-scale benchmark for chart summariza- tion

    Shankar Kantharaj, Rixie Tiffany Leong, Xiang Lin, Ahmed Masry, Megh Thakkar, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. Chart-to-text: A large-scale benchmark for chart summariza- tion. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1...

    2022

  13. [21]

    Answering questions about charts and generating visual ex- planations

    Dae Hyun Kim, Enamul Hoque, and Maneesh Agrawala. Answering questions about charts and generating visual ex- planations. In CHI ’20: CHI Conference on Human Fac- tors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, April 25-30, 2020, pages 1–13. ACM, 2020. 1

    2020

  14. [22]

    Evaluating the factual consistency of ab- stractive text summarization

    Wojciech Kryscinski, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. Evaluating the factual consistency of ab- stractive text summarization. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing (EMNLP), pages 9332–9346, Online, 2020. Ass...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Why a diagram is (some- times) worth ten thousand words

    Jill H Larkin and Herbert A Simon. Why a diagram is (some- times) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science, 11(1): 65–100, 1987. 1

    1987

  16. [24]

    Vlat: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test

    Sukwon Lee, Sung-Hee Kim, and Bum Chul Kwon. Vlat: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , 23(1):551–560, 2016. 2, 4, 8

    2016

  17. [25]

    Multimodal arxiv: A dataset for improving scientific comprehension of large vision-language models

    Lei Li, Yuqi Wang, Runxin Xu, Peiyi Wang, Xiachong Feng, Lingpeng Kong, and Qi Liu. Multimodal arxiv: A dataset for improving scientific comprehension of large vision-language models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2403.00231, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Evaluating object hallucination in large vision- language models

    Yifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang, Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Evaluating object hallucination in large vision- language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 292–305, Singapore, 2023. Association for ...

    2023

  19. [27]

    ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries

    Chin-Yew Lin. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out, pages 74–81, Barcelona, Spain, 2004. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. 3, 6

    2004

  20. [28]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European conference, zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, proceeding...

    2014

  21. [29]

    Mitigating hallucination in large multi-modal models via robust instruction tuning

    Fuxiao Liu, Kevin Lin, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Yaser Ya- coob, and Lijuan Wang. Mitigating hallucination in large multi-modal models via robust instruction tuning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, 2023. 3, 4

    2023

  22. [30]

    MMC: Advancing multimodal chart understanding with large-scale instruction tuning

    Fuxiao Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Yaser Yacoob, and Dong Yu. MMC: Advancing multimodal chart understanding with large-scale instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associa- ti...

    2024

  23. [31]

    Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26296–26306, 2024. 2

    2024

  24. [32]

    Misinformed by visualization: What do we learn from misinformative visualizations? In Computer Graphics Forum , pages 515–525

    Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Ayush Gupta, Kento Shigyo, Aoyu Wu, En- rico Bertini, and Huamin Qu. Misinformed by visualization: What do we learn from misinformative visualizations? In Computer Graphics Forum , pages 515–525. Wiley Online Library, 2022. 1

    2022

  25. [33]

    Accessible visual- ization via natural language descriptions: A four-level model of semantic content

    Alan Lundgard and Arvind Satyanarayan. Accessible visual- ization via natural language descriptions: A four-level model of semantic content. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 28(1):1073–1083, 2021. 1, 4, 7

    2021

  26. [34]

    ChartQA: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning

    Ahmed Masry, Xuan Long Do, Jia Qing Tan, Shafiq Joty, and Enamul Hoque. ChartQA: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 2263–2279, Dublin, Ireland, 2022. A...

    2022

  27. [35]

    UniChart: A universal vision- language pretrained model for chart comprehension and rea- soning

    Ahmed Masry, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Xuan Long Do, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. UniChart: A universal vision- language pretrained model for chart comprehension and rea- soning. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 14662...

    2023

  28. [36]

    Chartinstruct: Instruction tuning for chart comprehension and reasoning

    Ahmed Masry, Mehrad Shahmohammadi, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. Chartinstruct: Instruction tuning for chart comprehension and reasoning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2403.09028, 2024. 2, 3, 6

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chartgemma: Vi- sual instruction-tuning for chart reasoning in the wild

    Ahmed Masry, Megh Thakkar, Aayush Bajaj, Aaryaman Kartha, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. Chartgemma: Vi- sual instruction-tuning for chart reasoning in the wild. ArXiv preprint, abs/2407.04172, 2024. 2, 3, 6

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive sum- marization

    Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, and Ryan McDonald. On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive sum- marization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1906– 1919, Online, 2020. Association for Computatio...

    1906

  31. [39]

    Chartassisstant: A universal chart multimodal language model via chart-to-table pre-training and multitask instruction tuning.ArXiv preprint, abs/2401.02384, 2024

    Fanqing Meng, Wenqi Shao, Quanfeng Lu, Peng Gao, Kaipeng Zhang, Yu Qiao, and Ping Luo. Chartassisstant: A universal chart multimodal language model via chart-to-table pre-training and multitask instruction tuning.ArXiv preprint, abs/2401.02384, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Visualization analysis and design

    Tamara Munzner. Visualization analysis and design . CRC press, 2014. 2, 4

    2014

  33. [41]

    Clip-dpo: Vision-language models as a source of preference for fixing hallucinations in lvlms

    Yassine Ouali, Adrian Bulat, Brais Martinez, and Georgios Tzimiropoulos. Clip-dpo: Vision-language models as a source of preference for fixing hallucinations in lvlms. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 395–413. Springer, 2025. 3

    2025

  34. [42]

    PaddleOCR Documentation, 2024

    PaddleOCR. PaddleOCR Documentation, 2024. 5 10

    2024

  35. [43]

    The persuasive power of data visualization

    Anshul Vikram Pandey, Anjali Manivannan, Oded Nov, Mar- garet Satterthwaite, and Enrico Bertini. The persuasive power of data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visual- ization and Computer Graphics, 20(12):2211–2220, 2014. 1

    2014

  36. [44]

    Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation

    Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 311– 318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2002. Asso...

    2002

  37. [45]

    Text2Chart31: Instruction tuning for chart generation with automatic feedback

    Fatemeh Pesaran Zadeh, Juyeon Kim, Jin-Hwa Kim, and Gunhee Kim. Text2Chart31: Instruction tuning for chart generation with automatic feedback. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing , pages 11459–11480, Miami, Florida, USA, ...

    2024

  38. [46]

    The communicative function of ambiguity in language

    Steven T Piantadosi, Harry Tily, and Edward Gibson. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cogni- tion, 122(3):280–291, 2012. 4

    2012

  39. [47]

    Plummer, Liwei Wang, Chris M

    Bryan A. Plummer, Liwei Wang, Chris M. Cervantes, Juan C. Caicedo, Julia Hockenmaier, and Svetlana Lazeb- nik. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase corre- spondences for richer image-to-sentence models. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV ...

    2015

  40. [48]

    A call for clarity in reporting BLEU scores

    Matt Post. A call for clarity in reporting BLEU scores. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Transla- tion: Research Papers , pages 186–191, Brussels, Belgium,

  41. [49]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proceedings of th...

    2021

  42. [50]

    Chartsumm: A comprehensive bench- mark for automatic chart summarization of long and short summaries

    Raian Rahman, Rizvi Hasan, Abdullah Al Farhad, Md Tah- mid Rahman Laskar, Md Hamjajul Ashmafee, and Abu Rai- han Mostofa Kamal. Chartsumm: A comprehensive bench- mark for automatic chart summarization of long and short summaries. ArXiv preprint, abs/2304.13620, 2023. 1, 3, 5, 6

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Object hallucination in image cap- tioning

    Anna Rohrbach, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kaylee Burns, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. Object hallucination in image cap- tioning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 4035– 4045, Brussels, Belgium, 2018. Association f...

    2018

  44. [52]

    Striking a balance: Reader takeaways and preferences when integrating text and charts

    Chase Stokes, Vidya Setlur, Bridget Cogley, Arvind Satya- narayan, and Marti A Hearst. Striking a balance: Reader takeaways and preferences when integrating text and charts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graph- ics, 29(1):1233–1243, 2022. 1

    2022

  45. [53]

    Aligning large multi- modal models with factually augmented rlhf.ArXiv preprint, abs/2309.14525, 2023

    Zhiqing Sun, Sheng Shen, Shengcao Cao, Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yikang Shen, Chuang Gan, Liang-Yan Gui, Yu-Xiong Wang, Yiming Yang, et al. Aligning large multi- modal models with factually augmented rlhf.ArXiv preprint, abs/2309.14525, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Vis- Text: A benchmark for semantically rich chart captioning

    Benny Tang, Angie Boggust, and Arvind Satyanarayan. Vis- Text: A benchmark for semantically rich chart captioning. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 7268–7298, Toronto, Canada, 2023. Asso...

    2023

  47. [55]

    Thapliyal, Jordi Pont Tuset, Xi Chen, and Radu Soricut

    Ashish V . Thapliyal, Jordi Pont Tuset, Xi Chen, and Radu Soricut. Crossmodal-3600: A massively multilingual multi- modal evaluation dataset. InProceedings of the 2022 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 715–729, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emira...

    2022

  48. [56]

    Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language en- coders with improved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features

    Michael Tschannen, Alexey Gritsenko, Xiao Wang, Muham- mad Ferjad Naeem, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Nikhil Parthasarathy, Talfan Evans, Lucas Beyer, Ye Xia, Basil Mustafa, et al. Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language en- coders with improved semantic understanding, localization, ...

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mitigating hallucinations in large vision-language models with instruction contrastive decoding

    Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Liang Ding, and Chris Bie- mann. Mitigating hallucinations in large vision-language models with instruction contrastive decoding. ArXiv preprint, abs/2403.18715, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Charxiv: Charting gaps in realis- tic chart understanding in multimodal llms

    Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yi- tao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, et al. Charxiv: Charting gaps in realis- tic chart understanding in multimodal llms. ArXiv preprint, abs/2406.18521, 2024. 6

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Chartbench: A benchmark for complex visual reasoning in charts

    Zhengzhuo Xu, Sinan Du, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Chun Yuan, and Jian Guo. Chartbench: A benchmark for complex visual reasoning in charts. ArXiv preprint, abs/2312.15915,

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional hu- man feedback

    Tianyu Yu, Yuan Yao, Haoye Zhang, Taiwen He, Yifeng Han, Ganqu Cui, Jinyi Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Hai-Tao Zheng, Maosong Sun, et al. Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional hu- man feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on ...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Ad- vancing multimodal large language models in chart question answering with visualization-referenced instruction tuning

    Xingchen Zeng, Haichuan Lin, Yilin Ye, and Wei Zeng. Ad- vancing multimodal large language models in chart question answering with visualization-referenced instruction tuning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graph- ics, 2024. 2

    2024

  54. [62]

    Wein- berger, and Yoav Artzi

    Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Wein- berger, and Yoav Artzi. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with BERT. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net, 2020. 2, 3, 6

    2020

  55. [63]

    Beyond hallucinations: Enhanc- ing lvlms through hallucination-aware direct preference op- timization

    Zhiyuan Zhao, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Xiaoyi Dong, Ji- aqi Wang, and Conghui He. Beyond hallucinations: Enhanc- ing lvlms through hallucination-aware direct preference op- timization. ArXiv preprint, abs/2311.16839, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A. Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle- 11 consistent adversarial networks. In IEEE International Con- ference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2017, Venice, Italy, Octo- ber 22-29, 2017, pages 2242–2251. IEEE Com...

    2017

  57. [65]

    Retrieve Value

    Jiawen Zhu, Jinye Ran, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Zhi Li, and Kenny Choo. AutoChart: A dataset for chart-to-text generation task. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2021) , pages 1636–1644, Held Online, 2021. INCOMA Ltd...

    2021

  58. [68]

    If the caption is incorrect, it produces faulty code leading to a mismatched image, which is identified and removed

    Scenario A. If the caption is incorrect, it produces faulty code leading to a mismatched image, which is identified and removed

  59. [69]

    If the caption lacks sufficient detail, an over- simplified chart is generated and subsequently filtered out

    Scenario B. If the caption lacks sufficient detail, an over- simplified chart is generated and subsequently filtered out

  60. [70]

    Even if the caption is accurate, errors in code generation or execution can result in a failed recon- struction, leading the sample to be excluded

    Scenario C. Even if the caption is accurate, errors in code generation or execution can result in a failed recon- struction, leading the sample to be excluded

  61. [71]

    bar”, “line

    Scenario D. Only when the caption is both accurate and informative, and the chart regenerates without errors, does the sample pass verification. This process ensures that only captions containing both correct and adequately detailed information are retained. In summary, our pr...

  62. [72]

    Informativeness – Does the caption adequately describe the chart’s structure and key insights (highlighted in green and blue in Fig 1)?

  63. [73]

    Accuracy – How faithfully does the caption reflect the chart’s structure and key insights?

  64. [74]

    User Interfaces

    Fewer Hallucinations – Does the caption avoid infor- mation that cannot be inferred from the chart (high- lighted in red in Fig 1)? For the dataset-level study in § 3.5 (C HART CAP vs Chart- Summ), we added a fourth question–overall preference–to capture holistic quality while...

  65. [2018]

    Association for Computational Linguistics. 6

  66. [2649]

    IEEE Computer Society, 2015. 5

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.