Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 40 references

Bell states for fermions in loop quantum gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A pair of fermions coupled to loop quantum geometry can violate the Bell-CHSH inequality using surface-normal spin correlations.

desk verdict A concrete kinematical Bell-CHSH claim in LQG that I could not audit because the supplied text was corrupted; the abstract is plausible but the locality and dichotomic assumptions need referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04704 v1 pith:IYSGOHR3 submitted 2025-08-06 gr-qc hep-th

Hanno Sahlmann , Martin Zei{ss} This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords loopquantumgravityfermionsBellstatesBell-CHSHinequalitysurface-normalspinkinematicalHilbertspaceentanglementgeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a pair of fermions in loop quantum gravity can occupy a Bell state, and answers with a qualified yes. It first shows that obvious ways to define fermionic entanglement in this setting fail, so the notion is subtle. It then isolates a kinematical observable—the component of a fermion's spin normal to a surface—that is well defined with quantum geometry, and builds a correlation observable for two spacelike-separated fermions that mirrors the CHSH combination. The central result is a family of fermion states coupled to quantum geometry whose surface-normal spin correlations violate the Bell-CHSH inequality. A reader should care because this gives a concrete background-independent handle on fermion entanglement inside quantum gravity and connects to proposals that entanglement can witness gravitationally mediated effects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the surface-normal fermion spin operator, a two-valued kinematical observable built from the fermion field and the quantum geometry's surface normal. It replaces the fixed-direction spin operator of ordinary quantum mechanics, with the normal direction supplied by the gravitational degrees of freedom rather than by a background metric. This operator provides the local dichotomic measurements entering the CHSH-type correlation, and it is the object whose expectation values produce the violation.

What would settle it

Compute the CHSH expression for the exhibited states while varying the orientation of the surface at one fermion; if some orientation choice gives value $\leq 2$, the violation depends on a selected surface rather than on the state's correlations. A complementary check is to verify directly, on a family of surfaces, that the four surface-normal correlation operators satisfy the algebraic identity defining CHSH.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that Bell correlations are realizable in the kinematical Hilbert space of loop quantum gravity with fermions. The usual spin-component operator in a fixed spatial direction lacks a background-independent meaning in this setting, so the authors replace it with the component of fermion spin normal to a surface, an observable that couples fermionic and gravitational degrees of freedom. They show that several naive definitions of fermionic entanglement fail, then construct a two-fermion correlation observable that mirrors the CHSH combination using these surface-normal components. For a specific class of states, its expectation value exceeds the classical

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on treating the surface-normal fermion spin operator as a genuine two-valued local observable, with commuting pieces assigned to the two separated fermions; if that assignment is not legitimate, the computed values are not Bell-CHSH correlations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fermionic Bell correlations can be posed as kinematical questions in loop quantum gravity, before dynamics are imposed.
  • The CHSH violation gives a concrete target: fermion pairs coupled to quantum geometry can serve as a background-independent probe of gravitationally mediated entanglement.
  • The failure of naive entanglement definitions shows why surfaces and their normals—not fixed spatial axes—are needed to give spin measurements physical meaning in quantum gravity.
  • The deviation from the standard spin operator quantifies how quantum geometry can modify fermionic measurement correlations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper does not pursue is to impose the Hamiltonian constraint and ask whether the violating states survive into the physical Hilbert space; if they do not, the violation would be a kinematical artifact rather than a physical Bell violation.
  • The surface-normal construction points to a relational notion of spacelike separation: two fermions count as separated when the surface data make their normal-spin operators commute, replacing background-metric separation.
  • One could apply the same observable in a semiclassical geometry to see whether gravitational degrees of freedom alone generate the entanglement, connecting directly to tests of gravitationally induced entanglement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to describe fermionic Bell states in the kinematical Hilbert space of loop quantum gravity. It first argues that some naive notions of fermionic entanglement fail, then introduces a kinematical observable constructed from the component of fermion spin normal to a surface, compares it with the standard spin-component operator, and uses these normal components to define a CHSH-like correlation for spatially separated fermions. The abstract concludes that the authors exhibit states of fermions coupled to quantum geometry that violate the Bell-CHSH inequality. The abstract is readable, but the supplied body text is heavily garbled; I was unable to verify any definition, equation, spectrum, or explicit state from the manuscript text.

Significance. If the central existence claim could be verified, the paper would be a useful contribution to quantum information in background-independent quantum gravity. Explicit kinematical states violating a Bell-CHSH inequality would be relevant to recent proposals for gravitationally mediated entanglement and to the question of how spacelike separation and local measurements are defined without a fixed background metric. The paper also appears to offer a cautionary example that naive definitions of entanglement in LQG fail. However, because the body text as submitted is unreadable, the substantive result is at present unverified; the paper's significance is conditional on a recoverable and correct derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Body text (all sections)] The full text supplied for review is corrupted and unreadable: most equations, section headings, and proof passages appear as gibberish. The central claim in the final sentence of the abstract—that explicit states violate the Bell-CHSH inequality—therefore has no checkable support in this version. The authors should resubmit a readable manuscript with the complete derivation, explicit states, and the CHSH expectation-value computation.
  2. [Abstract, surface-normal observable] The claim 'component of the fermion spin normal to a surface' needs to be made precise. The normal n_i is constructed from triad/metric degrees of freedom, so the operator σ_n is not automatically a normalized, dichotomic Pauli-type observable. The authors must show that on the constructed states the relevant normal operator is well defined, self-adjoint, and has the spectrum (±1/2) required for the CHSH inequality to apply. The abstract does not establish this, and the unreadable body prevents verification.
  3. [Abstract, 'space-like separated fermions'] In the kinematical Hilbert space of LQG, 'spacelike separation' is a metric notion, not a state-independent given. The paper must specify that the relevant metric or triad operators are sharp on the exhibited states, or that the states lie in a sector where a separation statement is meaningful. It must also demonstrate that the Alice and Bob normal-spin operators commute on those states; otherwise the CHSH bound is not the appropriate Bell inequality for these observables.
  4. [Abstract, CHSH observable] A genuine CHSH test requires four independently selectable local settings. If both fermions use a common surface normal, or if the settings are chosen through a global surface-dependent construction, the setting choices may share a hidden common parameter and the computed S > 2 would not signal Bell nonlocality. The abstract's statement that the observable 'closely mirrors the CHSH observable' is insufficient; the authors need to exhibit the four operator pairs and justify their independence as local choices.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'in loop quantum, gravity' contains an erroneous comma after 'quantum'.
  2. [Throughout] Many displayed equations and section headings are illegible in the submitted text. This should be fixed at the source-file level, as it affects the reader's ability to follow the paper.
  3. [References] The reference list is not readable in the supplied version; please verify that all citations are present and correctly formatted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Bell-CHSH violation is a computed expectation value on exhibited states, not an input to their construction.

full rationale

The paper's core claim is a kinematical computation within loop quantum gravity. It introduces a normal-component spin operator for fermions, assembles the standard CHSH correlation combination, and then evaluates this observable on explicitly exhibited fermion-geometry states. The abstract's phrase "closely mirrors the CHSH observable" indicates that the Bell operator is deliberately built in the standard form; it does not define the violation into the states. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation carries the load of the Bell violation: the LQG framework and prior fermion-coupling results are external mathematical inputs, not restatements of the violation. The CHSH bound is used as a benchmark, and the exhibited states are checked against it, so the inequality is not used to select the states. The reviewer-rule concern about 'spacelike separated' requiring a background metric and about the dichotomic spectrum of the surface-normal spin operator concerns the physical interpretation of the CHSH test; it is a correctness risk, not a circularity. No equation was found in the supplied text that defines a quantity in terms of the very quantity it is claimed to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are visible from the abstract. The central derivation rests on LQG domain assumptions rather than fitted input. No new physical entities are proposed.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The loop quantum gravity kinematical Hilbert space accommodates fermion fields and quantum geometry operators on which the spin-normal-to-surface observable can be defined.
    The abstract states fermions fit naturally into LQG and the whole construction lives on this kinematical space.
  • domain assumption The component of fermion spin normal to a surface is a well-defined observable whose spectrum allows a CHSH dichotomic measurement.
    The abstract introduces and compares this operator to standard spin components; its measurement-theoretic status is assumed.
  • domain assumption Spacelike separated fermions have commuting observables and the CHSH inequality is a valid constraint on the computed correlations.
    The Bell-CHSH violation only has its stated meaning if locality conditions hold; the abstract says spacelike separated but not how this is implemented without a background metric.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bell states for fermions in loop quantum gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYSGOHR3

@misc{pith2026250804704,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bell states for fermions in loop quantum gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYSGOHR3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04704}
}
read the original abstract

Fermion fields are fundamental for the description of nature and also fit very naturally into the framework of loop quantum gravity. Motivated partially by proposals to use gravitationally mediated entanglement of matter as a witness for the quantum nature of gravity, we investigate how such entanglement can be defined and investigated in loop quantum gravity. In particular, we ask how a pair of fermions in a Bell state could be described in loop quantum, gravity. We demonstrate that the notion of fermionic entanglement in loop quantum gravity is subtle, by showing that some potential ways to define it fail. We then investigate a kinematical observable involving both, fermionic and gravitational degrees of freedom, the component of the fermion spin normal to a surface. We study its properties, and compare it to the standard operator for components of spin in a given direction in quantum mechanics. Using these normal components of spin, we define a kinematical observable that measures the correlation between space-like separated fermions which closely mirrors the CHSH observable. Finally, we exhibit states of the fermions coupled to quantum geometry that violate the Bell-CHSH inequality.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.block 'output.state := after.block 'output.state := if if FUNCTION new.sentence out...

  2. [2]

    Fermions in Quantum Gravity

    H.A. Morales-Tecotl and C. Rovelli, Fermions in quantum gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3642 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3642 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9401011 gr-qc/9401011 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Morales-Tecotl and C

    H.A. Morales-Tecotl and C. Rovelli, Loop space representation of quantum fermions and gravity , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00343-Q Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 325

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00343-q 1995

  4. [4]

    Smolin, Fermions and topology , https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404010 gr-qc/9404010

    L. Smolin, Fermions and topology , https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404010 gr-qc/9404010

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Fermion spins in loop quantum gravity

    R. Mansuroglu and H. Sahlmann, Fermion spins in loop quantum gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.066016 Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 066016 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00233 2011.00233 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Clauser, M.A

    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 1969

  7. [7]

    Thiemann, Kinematical Hilbert spaces for Fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 Class

    T. Thiemann, Kinematical Hilbert spaces for Fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 1487 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9705021 gr-qc/9705021 ]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Quantization of Diffeomorphism-Invariant Theories with Fermions

    J.C. Baez and K.V. Krasnov, Quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories with fermions , https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532400 J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998) 1251 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9703112 hep-th/9703112 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Bojowald and R

    M. Bojowald and R. Das, Canonical gravity with fermions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064009 Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 064009 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5722 0710.5722 ]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Lewandowski and C

    J. Lewandowski and C. Zhang, Fermion coupling to loop quantum gravity: Canonical formulation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124025 Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 124025 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08865 2112.08865 ]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G.W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toro s , M. Paternostro et al., Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240401 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 240401 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06050 1707.06050 ]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240402 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 240402 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06036 1707.06036 ]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Sahlmann and M

    H. Sahlmann and M. Zei , Entanglement generation from gravitational interactions in spin foam models , in preparation

  6. [14]

    Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2244 Phys

    A. Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2244 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2244

    1986 doi

  7. [15]

    Barbero G., Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5507 Phys

    J.F. Barbero G., Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5507 Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5507 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9410014 gr-qc/9410014 ]

    1995 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Livine, Intertwiner Entanglement on Spin Networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.026009 Phys

    E.R. Livine, Intertwiner Entanglement on Spin Networks , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.026009 Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 026009 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08511 1709.08511 ]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chen and E.R

    Q. Chen and E.R. Livine, Intertwiner entanglement excitation and holonomy operator , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac90aa Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 215013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03093 2204.03093 ]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bianchi and E.R

    E. Bianchi and E.R. Livine, Loop Quantum Gravity and Quantum Information , in Handbook of Quantum Gravity, p. 1–29, Springer Nature Singapore (2023), DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_108-1

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Freidel and S

    L. Freidel and S. Speziale, Twisted geometries: A geometric parametrization of SU(2) phase space , https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.084040 Physical Review D 82 (2010)

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    Bianchi, P

    E. Bianchi, P. Don \`a and I. Vilensky, Entanglement entropy of Bell-network states in loop quantum gravity: Analytical and numerical results , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.086013 Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 086013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10996 1812.10996 ]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bayta s , E

    B. Bayta s , E. Bianchi and N. Yokomizo, Gluing polyhedra with entanglement in loop quantum gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.026001 Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 026001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05856 1805.05856 ]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga, P. Ribes-Metidieri, D. Kranas and S. Nadal-Gisbert, How ubiquitous is entanglement in quantum field theory? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.085005 Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 085005 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13742 2302.13742 ]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga, E. Mart \' n-Mart \' nez, S. Nadal-Gisbert, T.R. Perche, J. Polo-G \'o mez et al., Multimode nature of spacetime entanglement in QFT , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.085013 Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 085013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16368 2409.16368 ]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Thiemann, QSD 5: Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum field theories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 Class

    T. Thiemann, QSD 5: Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum field theories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 1281 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9705019 gr-qc/9705019 ]

    1998 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bianchi, M

    E. Bianchi, M. Han, C. Rovelli, W. Wieland, E. Magliaro and C. Perini, Spinfoam fermions , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/23/235023 Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 235023 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4719 1012.4719 ]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Han and C

    M. Han and C. Rovelli, Spin-foam Fermions: PCT Symmetry, Dirac Determinant, and Correlation Functions , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/7/075007 Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 075007 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3264 1101.3264 ]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mansuroglu and H

    R. Mansuroglu and H. Sahlmann, Kinematics of arbitrary spin matter fields in loop quantum gravity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.106010 Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 106010 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13848 2011.13848 ]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mercuri, Fermions in Ashtekar-Barbero connections formalism for arbitrary values of the Immirzi parameter , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.084016 Phys

    S. Mercuri, Fermions in Ashtekar-Barbero connections formalism for arbitrary values of the Immirzi parameter , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.084016 Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 084016 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0601013 gr-qc/0601013 ]

    2006 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    at Erlangen-N\

    J. Gro e, Spin Observables in Loop Quantum Gravity ( BSc thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universit\"at Erlangen-N\"urnberg ) , 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu and W.K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306 Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 052306 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907047 quant-ph/9907047 ]

    2000 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Quantum theory of geometry. 1: Area operators , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/14/1A/006 Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) A55 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602046 gr-qc/9602046 ]

    1997 arXiv

  25. [33]

    at Erlangen-N\

    L. Kossmann, Fermion entanglement in states of loop quantum gravity ( BSc thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universit\"at Erlangen-N\"urnberg ) , 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Haggard, J

    H.M. Haggard, J. Lewandowski and H. Sahlmann, Emergence of Riemannian Quantum Geometry , https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02840 2302.02840

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Major, Operators for quantized directions , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/307 Classical and Quantum Gravity 16 (1999) 3859–3877

    S.A. Major, Operators for quantized directions , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/307 Classical and Quantum Gravity 16 (1999) 3859–3877

    1999 doi

  28. [36]

    Alesci, I

    E. Alesci, I. Mäkinen and J. Yang, Graphical calculus of spin networks , https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00268 2304.00268

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Barrett, R.J

    J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes and F. Hellmann, Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude , https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3244218 J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 112504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.1170 0902.1170 ]

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Chefles and S.M

    A. Chefles and S.M. Barnett, Diagonalisation of the Bell-CHSH operator , https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00395-2 Physics Letters A 232 (1997) 4

    1997 doi

  31. [39]

    Zei , Martin , Fermionic Entanglement and Entanglement Production in Loop Quantum Gravity , Master's thesis, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg , 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Major, Quantum Geometry Phenomenology: Angle and Semiclassical States , https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/360/1/012061 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 360 (2012) 012061

    S.A. Major, Quantum Geometry Phenomenology: Angle and Semiclassical States , https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/360/1/012061 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 360 (2012) 012061

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.