Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Stacking-induced type-II quantum spin Hall insulators with high spin Chern number in unconventional magnetism

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Stacking two type-II quantum spin Hall insulators yields a quantum spin Hall insulator with spin Chern number 2 and twice the quantized spin Hall conductance of a monolayer.

desk verdict The stacking principle is real and the lattice model carries it; the Nb2SeTeO prediction needs magnetic ground-state evidence before it can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05365 v1 pith:NIOI3UJN submitted 2025-08-07 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chao-Yang Tan , Panjun Feng , Ze-Feng Gao , Fengjie Ma , Peng-Jie Guo , Zhong-Yi Lu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords type-IIquantumspinHallinsulatorChernnumberaltermagnetismNb2SeTeObilayerstackingconductancetopologicaledgestatesunconventionalcompensatedmagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conventional wisdom holds that stacking two quantum spin Hall insulators makes a trivial insulator, because two copies of a Z2-nontrivial phase cancel. This paper asks whether that rule holds for the newer class of type-II quantum spin Hall insulators, which are classified by a spin Chern number rather than by Z2 and do not need time-reversal symmetry. Using a bilayer altermagnetic lattice model, it shows the rule does not hold: two type-II monolayers combine into a type-II QSHI with spin Chern number 2, hosting two pairs of counter-propagating spin-polarized edge states and a quantized spin Hall conductance twice that of a monolayer. First-principles calculations identify strained bilayer Nb2SeTeO as a candidate material, and the argument extends to multilayers with proportionally larger spin Chern numbers. The result matters because it turns layer number into a control knob for the quantized spin Hall conductance.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin Chern number, $C_s=\frac{1}{2}(C_\uparrow-C_\downarrow)$, computed from the Berry curvature of occupied spin-up and spin-down bands. In a type-II QSHI the spin-up and spin-down massive Dirac/Weyl points sit in different regions of the Brillouin zone, so the two spin channels carry independent Chern numbers. The stacking argument works because the interlayer coupling $t_z=|t_1|/10$ is weak: it does not close the gap or transfer Chern number between the layers, so the bilayer's spin-resolved Chern numbers are simply the sum of the two monolayers, $C_\uparrow=2$, $C_\downarrow=-2$. The paper also identifies the d-wave altermagnetic symmetry of the bilayer as what

What would settle it

A concrete calculation to settle the claim: diagonalize the bilayer lattice Hamiltonian with $t_z$ increased from $|t_1|/10$ to $|t_1|/2$ and at several stacking registries; if the spin Chern number drops from 2 to 0 (or the edge-state count from two pairs to zero) while the bulk remains gapped, the additivity assumption fails. For the material, a falsifying observation would be a measured or computed ground state without interlayer ferromagnetic order, which would remove the layer-additive spin structure the prediction relies on.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the stacking rule for type-II quantum spin Hall insulators (QSHIs) is the opposite of the type-I rule. Two monolayers that are each type-II QSHIs—insulators whose topological character is carried by spin-resolved Chern numbers and whose edge states are chiral and spin-polarized—do not annihilate when stacked. Instead, with weak interlayer hopping, each monolayer contributes its spin Chern number, so the bilayer is a type-II QSHI with spin Chern number $C_s=2$; the spin-up occupied bands give $C_\uparrow=2$ and the spin-down bands give $C_\downarrow=-2$. The bilayer hosts two pairs of topological edge states with opposite chirality and opposite spin polarizat

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that weak interlayer hopping leaves each monolayer's spin-resolved Chern number intact, so the bilayer's spin Chern number is simply the sum; in the material prediction it is also assumed that bilayer Nb2SeTeO has the computed interlayer-ferromagnetic, intralayer-antiferromagnetic ground state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bilayer's spin Hall conductance is quantized at $2e/(2\pi)$, twice the monolayer value, and should be observable as a doubled quantized response.
  • The boundary hosts two pairs of topological edge states with opposite chirality and spin polarization, doubling the number of conducting channels without a bulk transition.
  • The high spin Chern number phase survives breaking of $U(1)$ spin-rotation symmetry over a broad parameter range, so it is not limited to idealized conserved $S_z$ models.
  • Stacking $N$ type-II monolayers under the same weak-coupling condition yields a type-II QSHI with spin Chern number $N$ and proportionally larger quantized spin Hall conductance.
  • Strained bilayer Nb2SeTeO is a concrete material candidate, realizing the phase in both altermagnetic and unconventional compensated magnetic orders.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the layer-count rule should make the spin Hall conductance a digitized quantity, $\sigma^z_{xy}=N e/(2\pi)$ for $N$ stacked type-II monolayers; a trilayer or multilayer heterostructure with tunnel barriers would be a direct test of this counting.
  • Because the mechanism only requires spin-up and spin-down Weyl points in different Brillouin-zone regions plus weak interlayer coupling, other compensated magnetic monolayers with spin Chern number 1 should stack the same way; a high-throughput search over altermagnetic candidates could test this.
  • The coexistence of two pairs of edge states with opposite chirality and opposite spin polarization on the same boundary suggests a possible spin-split transport network, though the paper does not discuss device implications.
  • The type-I versus type-II contrast points to a general design principle: additivity of the topological invariant under stacking depends on whether the invariant is integer-valued (spin Chern number) or $\mathbb{Z}_2$; this could inform stacking engineering of other topological phases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript asks whether stacking two monolayer type-II quantum spin Hall insulators (QSHIs), rather than the trivial result familiar from type-I systems, can produce a nontrivial high-spin-Chern-number phase. The authors introduce a bilayer altermagnetic lattice model with weak interlayer hopping, show that it remains insulating with spin Chern number C_s = 2, and demonstrate two pairs of opposite-chirality, opposite-polarization edge states and a quantized spin Hall conductance of 2e/(2π). They further claim this phase persists when U(1) spin conservation is broken, and they propose bilayer Nb2SeTeO under 0.238% anisotropic strain as a concrete material realization. Finally, they argue that multilayers naturally give larger spin Chern numbers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper establishes a useful stacking principle for type-II QSHIs that is distinct from the type-I case, and it provides a concrete route to highly quantized spin Hall conductance. The lattice-model demonstration is a genuine strength: for the chosen parameters, the bilayer Hamiltonian is explicit, the gap is verified, and the spin Chern number, spin Hall conductance, and edge states are computed directly rather than inferred. The material prediction, however, is conditional on an assumed magnetic ground state and an ad hoc strain, and the U(1)-broken robustness claim is supported by only a single parameter point. The paper therefore merits revision rather than acceptance in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Candidate materials (Fig. 4)] The magnetic ground state of bilayer Nb2SeTeO is assumed to be intralayer antiferromagnetic and interlayer ferromagnetic, but no total-energy comparison among possible magnetic configurations or interlayer stackings is reported. The high-spin-Chern phase requires this specific magnetic order, so the material prediction is not established. Please provide total-energy calculations for the relevant magnetic configurations (or clearly label the assumed order as hypothetical and justify why it should be considered).
  2. [Candidate materials (Fig. 4)] All topological calculations for Nb2SeTeO are performed after applying a 0.238% anisotropic strain (tensile along a, compressive along b). No strain-energy curve, stability check, or phase diagram versus strain magnitude is given. Moreover, the strained system has Pmm2 symmetry and is described as an unconventional compensated magnet, whereas the lattice model is d-wave altermagnetic. This raises the question of whether the topological phase is a robust property of the material or an artifact of a single ad hoc strain value.
  3. [Lattice Model (Fig. 3 and abstract)] The statement that the high-spin-Chern phase 'persists over a broad parameter range' when U(1) symmetry is broken is not substantiated. Only one representative parameter set (|λ|=0.2, θ=π/10) is shown. A phase diagram or a scan over the relevant parameters (such as λ, θ, m, and tz) is needed to support the claim that the gap and the spin Hall conductance remain quantized over a finite region of parameter space.
  4. [Lattice Model (Eq. (3) and Fig. 3)] In the U(1)-broken case, spin Sz is not conserved, so the meaning of 'spin-resolved Chern numbers' C_↑=2 and C_↓=-2 requires an explicit definition. Without specifying how the spin sectors are separated (for example, by projection onto spin eigenstates or by a spin gap), the spin Chern number invariant is ambiguous. Since the paper's central claim for the broken-U(1) regime rests on this quantity, the definition and computation method should be stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2(c) caption] The caption refers to a '60-layer AM nanoribbon'; this likely means a ribbon of 60 sites or unit cells in the width direction, not 60 physical layers. Please clarify the notation.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Eq. (2)] The creation operators in the first term of Eq. (1) and the interlayer hopping in Eq. (2) do not explicitly show spin indices. While the notation is inferable, explicitly including spin indices would improve readability.
  3. [Candidate materials] The space group is written as 'P-4mm'; the standard symbol for the C4v symmorphic group is P4mm. Please check the notation.
  4. [Lattice Model, second paragraph] The sentence beginning 'With SOC, Since the bilayer lattice model breaks...' has a capitalization/grammar issue after the comma. It should be revised for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the lattice-model stacking result is computed from an explicit Hamiltonian, and the material prediction, though conditional on assumed magnetic order and self-cited monolayer input, is not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central lattice-model claim is self-contained. The monolayer and bilayer Hamiltonians are written out explicitly (Eqs. 1–3), and the bilayer spin Chern numbers, spin Hall conductance, and edge states are obtained by direct calculation (Berry curvature, SHC, open-boundary-condition spectra), not by assuming the desired answer. The weak interlayer hopping tz=|t1|/10 is a parameter choice, not a fit to the target; the persistence of the gap and the quantization of C_up=2, C_down=-2 are checked numerically. The stacking result is a legitimate consequence of Chern-number additivity plus an explicit gap-preserving calculation, rather than a definitional tautology in the objectionable sense. The only self-citations are to the authors' prior monolayer type-II QSHI model and monolayer Nb2SeTeO prediction. The bilayer Nb2SeTeO calculation is a new first-principles computation, but it does rely on the assumed magnetic order (intralayer antiferromagnetism, interlayer ferromagnetism) and on a post-hoc 0.238% strain to open a gap. These are unverified physical inputs and represent a correctness risk, not a circular step: the bilayer topology is computed, not read off from the monolayer conclusion. No equation in the paper reduces to a fitted target, and no load-bearing argument is justified only by an unverified self-citation. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular; the material-specific prediction is conditional, but conditionality is not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a previously constructed monolayer model (self-citation) and on the assumption that weak interlayer coupling preserves the sum of spin Chern numbers. For the material, the main unstated inputs are the magnetic ground state and the reliability of PBE-GGA. No new particles or physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Monolayer model parameters (td, t1, t2, lambda, m) = td=1; t1=-t2=0.8; |lambda|=0.1; |m|=1.2
    Chosen by hand to place the monolayer in the type-II QSHI phase; the paper does not systematically map the full phase diagram.
  • Interlayer hopping tz = |t1|/10 = 0.08
    Weak interlayer coupling introduced so that the two monolayers do not strongly hybridize; central to the stacking result.
  • Anisotropic strain in Nb2SeTeO = 0.238% tensile along a, 0.238% compressive along b
    Applied to remove the tiny band overlap and open a gap; a post-hoc tuning of the material Hamiltonian.
  • SOC orientation angle theta = theta=pi/10 in broken-U(1) example
    One representative parameter choice showing robustness; no exhaustive phase diagram is presented.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Berry curvature integration yields integer Chern numbers and the spin Chern number formula Cs=(C_up-C_down)/2 is valid when Sz is conserved.
    Standard topological band theory from Refs. [19-21]; used to compute Chern numbers and spin Hall conductance.
  • ad hoc to paper The monolayer lattice model realizes a type-II QSHI with spin Chern number 1 under the specified hopping and on-site potential conditions.
    This is the construction from the authors' previous work [11]; the present paper reuses it without independent derivation.
  • domain assumption Bilayer Nb2SeTeO has interlayer ferromagnetic and intralayer antiferromagnetic (or unconventional compensated) magnetic order.
    Assumed based on the model; no magnetic exchange calculation or comparison of magnetic orders is shown in the Letter.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA with the PAW method is accurate enough to determine the topological character of Nb2SeTeO.
    Standard DFT functional; no U or hybrid functional cross-check is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stacking-induced type-II quantum spin Hall insulators with high spin Chern number in unconventional magnetism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NIOI3UJN

@misc{pith2026250805365,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stacking-induced type-II quantum spin Hall insulators with high spin Chern number in unconventional magnetism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NIOI3UJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05365}
}
abstract

Generally, stacking two monolayer type-I quantum spin Hall insulators gives rise to a trivial insulator. However, whether or not stacking two type-II quantum spin Hall insulators results in a trivial insulator has not yet been explored. In this letter, based on the calculations of lattice model, we demonstrate that stacking two type-II quantum spin Hall insulators does not yield a trivial insulator, but instead forms a quantum spin Hall insulator with high spin Chern number. In this phase, there are two pairs of topological edge states with opposite chirality and polarization coexisting in the boundary. Our calculations further reveal that the quantized spin Hall conductance of the bilayer is twice that of the monolayer. When U(1) symmetry is present, the high spin Chern number phase remains stable; when U(1) symmetry is broken, it persists over a broad parameter range. Furthermore, based on the first-principles electronic structure calculations, we propose that bilayer Nb$_2$SeTeO is a type-II quantum spin Hall insulator with high spin Chern number. Finally, extending this strategy to multilayer stacks naturally leads to quantum spin Hall insulator with larger spin Chern number. Our work not only deepens the distinction between type-I and type-II quantum spin Hall insulators, but also offers a route toward realizing highly quantized spin Hall conductance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.05365 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left panels: the edge states for monolayer (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) AA-stacked bilayer altermagnetic (AM) lattice model, where sites with different colors represent sublattices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The band structure, SHC and edge state for bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sliding-induced ferrovalley polarization and possible antiferromagnetic half-metal in bilayer altermagnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Interlayer sliding in M2A2B and M2AA'B bilayer altermagnets induces ferrovalley polarization and antiferromagnetic half-metallicity, with Mo2O2O showing 0.31 eV valley splitting and V2SSeO as a candidate half-metal.

  2. Ultrafast optical route to coupled ferroelectric and altermagnetic switching

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LiV2F6 is predicted to host charge-order-induced altermagnetism and ferroelectricity that reverse together under ultrafast laser-driven charge transfer in about 15 fs.

  3. Double quantum spin Hall phase in bilayer ZrTe$_5$

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    First-principles calculations show bilayer ZrTe5 realizes a double quantum spin Hall phase with two pairs of helical edge states that transitions to a Z2=1 phase under uniaxial strain.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

    Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials & Micro-nano Devices. Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China 3.The Center for Advanced Quantum Studies and School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China 4.Key Laboratory of Multiscale Spin Physics (Ministry of Education), Beijing Normal Universi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quan- tization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional param- agnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in 5 Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    However, whether or not stacking two type-II quantum spin Hall insulators results in a trivial insulator has not yet been explored

    Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei 230088, China (Dated: August 25, 2025) Generally, stacking two monolayer type-I quantum spin Hall insulators gives rise to a trivial insulator. However, whether or not stacking two type-II quantum spin Hall insulators results in a trivial insulator has not yet been explored. In this letter, based on the calculations of lat...

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Hal- dane, Quantum Spin-Hall Effect and Topologically In- variant Chern Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036808 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    K¨ onig, S

    M. K¨ onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Br¨ une, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Insulator State in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    C.-X. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Yan, X.-L. Qi, T. Frauenheim, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, Oscillatory crossover from two-dimensional to three-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 81, 041307 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-ii quantum spin hall insulator (2025), arXiv:2503.13397

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Duan, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Quantized Spin-Hall Conductivity in Al- termagnet Fe 2Te2O with Mirror-Spin Coupling (2025), arXiv:2503.10681

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Guo, X.-Y

    P.-J. Guo, X.-Y. Hou, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, W. Ji, and Z.-Y. Lu, Luttinger compensated bipolarized magnetic semiconductor (2025), arXiv:2502.18136

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Liu, S.-D

    Y. Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y. Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two- Dimensional Fully Compensated Ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116703 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Hou, Z.-F

    X.-Y. Hou, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, P.-J. Guo, and Z.- Y. Lu, Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Material LaMn2SbO6, Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 070712 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Bipolarized Weyl semimetals and quan- tum crystal valley Hall effect in two-dimensional alter- magnetic materials (2024), arXiv:2406.16603

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    See Supplemental Materials, which includes supplemen- tal figures and tables, details of calculation methods and Refs. [19–26]

  14. [22]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  15. [23]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-s. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First Principles Calculation of Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037204 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  17. [25]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ˙.uller, Efficiency of ab-initio to- tal energy calculations for metals and semiconductors us- ing a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  19. [27]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.