Current-Enhanced Excited States in Lattice QCD Three-Point Functions

Lorenzo Barca

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Current-Enhanced Excited States in Lattice QCD Three-Point Functions

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the inserted current and the kinematics select which excited states contaminate hadron three-point functions, through quark-line disconnected diagrams whose contributions grow with the spatial volume.

desk verdict A new diagrammatic criterion for excited-state contamination in lattice three-point functions, with a compelling vector-channel test; the general mapping from contractions to states is plausible but not fully proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09006 v1 pith:XEGSNGPU submitted 2025-08-12 hep-lat

Lorenzo Barca This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lat

keywords latticeQCDexcited-statecontaminationthree-pointfunctionsquark-linedisconnecteddiagramsvariationalmethodcurrent-enhancedstatesnucleonmatrixelementsvectormesondominance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to explain why certain excited states, not necessarily the lightest ones, dominate excited-state contamination in lattice QCD three-point functions. It argues that the inserted current preferentially creates specific multi-hadron states—$N\pi$, $N\sigma$, $N\rho$, $B^*\pi$—and that these current-enhanced states enter through quark-line disconnected diagrams whose amplitude is not volume-suppressed. A variational analysis with operators built from the nucleon plus the relevant meson removes the contamination, and numerical evidence shows the predicted states dominate at accessible source–sink separations. If correct, the criterion tells practitioners which operators to include in multi-state fits and which kinematics to avoid, reducing a leading systematic uncertainty in hadron structure calculations.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the current–meson two-point function appearing in quark-line disconnected (direct and disconnected) Wick contractions. A current $J$ inserted at time $\tau$ can couple directly to a meson with the current's quantum numbers, creating a multi-hadron state with the nucleon; when that meson carries the same momentum as the current transfer, translational invariance gives a spatial-volume factor that is absent in connected diagrams. The variational method (GEVP) with a basis of single- and multi-hadron operators constructs improved operators that overlap with the selected state, so the enhanced contribution can be isolated and subtracted; the paper's numerical tests use this to remove $N\rho$ contamination from nucleon vector matrix elements.

What would settle it

Take a channel predicted to be current-enhanced, e.g. nucleon isovector vector with $N\rho$, and compute the three-point function at a lighter pion mass where the $\rho$ lies above the $\pi\pi$ P-wave threshold; if the dominant contamination is still $N\rho$-like rather than $N\pi\pi$, or if the quark-line disconnected term does not scale as $L^3$ when two volumes are compared, the argument would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a diagrammatic criterion for excited-state contamination: in a hadron three-point function, the excited states that matter are those whose Wick contraction topologies include quark-line disconnected contributions, specifically the direct term where the current creates a meson at time $\tau$ and the disconnected term where the current is vacuum-averaged. When the meson momentum equals the current momentum transfer, $\vec p'_M=\vec q$, these terms are enhanced by the spatial volume $L^3/a^3$ in the non-interacting limit, and numerically are $\mathcal{O}(100)$ larger than the connected term. Because they decay faster in Euclidean time than ground states, they are exponentially suppressed only at large separations; at the intermediate separations accessible today they dominate. The paper shows, in nucleon axial, scalar and vector channels and in $B\to\pi$, that this mechanism identifies $N\pi$, $N\sigma$ and $N\rho$ as the dominant contaminants, even when those states are heavy, and explains why including only $N\pi$ operators helps in some channels and not others.

Load-bearing premise

The whole criterion rests on assuming that each Wick contraction topology can be mapped one-to-one to a physical intermediate state in the interacting theory; if disconnected diagrams mix with other states, the diagrammatic rule may name the wrong contaminant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The presence or absence of quark-line disconnected diagrams in a three-point function directly indicates which excited states are current-enhanced and must be handled in fits.
In nucleon axial channels, $N\pi$ states dominate at accessible separations when kinematics allow the pion to carry the current momentum, matching chiral effective theory; in the forward limit $N a_1$-like states may matter.
In the isovector vector channel, $N\rho$ states dominate even though their energy is well above $N\pi$ and $N\pi\pi$, so variational bases that omit $N\rho$ leave residual contamination.
In the isoscalar scalar channel $N\sigma$ states (or $N\pi\pi$ in S-wave at lighter pion masses) dominate, while $N\pi$ operators have no effect because they lack the relevant disconnected diagram.
For $B\to\pi\ell\nu$, $B^*\pi$ states are the expected current-enhanced contaminants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One testable extension is to use the same diagrammatic criterion to design kinematics with $\vec p'_M\neq\vec q$, suppressing the enhanced contamination before fitting, as a cross-check on the variational subtraction.
The volume-scaling mechanism implies that finite-volume corrections to hadron matrix elements may be larger for current-enhanced channels, so comparisons between volumes or to the infinite-volume limit should watch for enhanced $L^3$ effects in the excited-state sector.
Because the argument only needs a current and a Wick decomposition, it should carry over to four-point functions and to gluonic currents, where the connected contribution is absent and the disconnected one may dominate from even shorter times.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know about this one: Barca proposes a simple rule for which excited states contaminate hadron three-point functions—look for quark-line disconnected diagrams. When the meson momentum matches the current momentum, those diagrams are enhanced by the volume, and the states they couple to (N rho, N pi, N sigma) dominate the excited-state contamination at accessible source-sink separations. The new piece is the general Wick-contraction criterion, which explains why N pi works in the axial channel but fails in the scalar channel, and why N rho—despite being heavy—dominates the isovector vector channel.

What's good: the App. B test is the real evidence. On a 2.4 fm, 429 MeV ensemble, a GEVP with N and N rho operators visibly removes the contamination in both forward and off-forward vector ratios. That is an independent confirmation that the rho's coupling to the vector current makes N rho the dominant contamination, even though N pi and N pi pi are lighter. The ChPT comparisons in axial and scalar channels are consistent with the criterion. The paper is honest about the dependence on m_pi and L.

Soft spots: the general mapping from contraction topology to physical intermediate states is invoked via a partially quenched framework [15], but not derived. In the interacting theory, the spectral sum is not ordered by Wick contraction, so the one-to-one association is a heuristic, not a theorem. That said, the App. B result works without the mapping—it uses an explicit N rho operator—so the central mechanism is not circular. The volume-scaling check is mentioned but not shown; the reader has to trust [14] for that. The numerics are thin: 400 configurations on one ensemble with a heavy pion mass, where the rho is essentially stable. The axial a1 discussion is speculative. And "prove" is too strong for a single-ensemble demonstration.

Who it's for: lattice practitioners working on hadron structure and excited-state systematics. It gives a practical operator-selection rule and explains why some standard variational analyses fail to remove contamination. It deserves a serious referee. The referee should push for the volume-scaling data, a lighter-pion check, and softer claims, but the core idea is testable and likely to be useful.

My verdict: worth engaging. I'd send it to peer review, and I'd cite it if I were working in this area.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general diagrammatic criterion for identifying which excited states contaminate lattice QCD three-point functions. The argument is that when a meson operator carries the same momentum as the inserted current, quark-line disconnected Wick contractions, such as the direct diagram in Eq. (11), are enhanced by a factor of order L^3/a^3 in the non-interacting limit, making the corresponding multi-hadron states ('current-enhanced states') dominant at the source-sink separations accessible in present calculations. The authors argue that the presence or absence of such disconnected diagrams therefore identifies which states must be included in multi-state fits or variational analyses, and they support this with examples in the nucleon axial, scalar, and vector channels, in B->pi semileptonic decays, and with a GEVP subtraction using N and N-rho operators in Appendix B. The paper is written as a letter and presents one numerical ensemble test, with additional agreement claimed with ChPT expectations and published lattice results.

Significance. If correct, the criterion would be practically valuable: it gives lattice practitioners a simple rule for choosing operators in variational analyses and for predicting which multi-hadron states dominate excited-state contamination, going beyond ChPT in channels where no chiral prediction exists. The Wick-contraction counting is internally consistent, the non-interacting volume-enhancement argument is transparent, and the GEVP subtraction in Fig. 2 visibly reduces the contamination in the vector channel, corroborating the claimed N-rho dominance. The framework also makes falsifiable predictions, such as the ineffectiveness of N-pi operators in the scalar channel and the importance of N-rho operators in the vector channel, which is a strength. The main weaknesses are that the one-to-one mapping between contraction topology and physical intermediate states is asserted rather than derived, and that the numerical support is limited to one small ensemble subset with several load-bearing checks not shown in the manuscript.

major comments (4)

[Volume enhancement of current-enhanced states, Eq. (11) and following text] The central criterion that the presence or absence of quark-line disconnected diagrams identifies which excited states contaminate the three-point function rests on a one-to-one mapping between individual Wick contractions and physical intermediate states in the spectral decomposition, introduced via the partially quenched framework [15]. This mapping is not derived, and the spectral decomposition in Eq. (2) is a sum over physical states that is not organized by contraction topology. In particular, the current-meson factor <O_M J> inside W_D in Eq. (11) couples to every state with the meson quantum numbers, not only to the single-meson state, and the paper itself notes after Eq. (14) that resonances can couple to their decay products and that the dominant state depends on m_pi and L. Since the predictions for N-pi, N-sigma, N-rho, and B*-pi all depend on this mapping, the manuscript needs either a derivation of the mapping in the interacting theory or an explicit statement that it is a conjecture whose validation relies on the numerical evidence presented.
[Volume enhancement of current-enhanced states, text after Eq. (12)] The manuscript states that quark-line disconnected contributions are O(100) larger than connected ones on the L=24a ensemble and that a comparison of L=24a and L=48a volumes 'confirms' the L^3/a^3 scaling, but no numerical results, plots, or tables supporting either statement are shown in the paper. The citation to [14] does not point to a specific figure or table containing this volume-scaling check. Because the volume enhancement is the quantitative mechanism behind the claimed dominance at accessible separations, this evidence should either be presented in the manuscript or the claim should be softened to a heuristic expectation that is not yet numerically verified.
[Appendix B, Eqs. (B4)-(B5)] The GEVP-improved three-point function in Eq. (B4) omits the diagonal O_i=O_j=O_{N-rho} contribution, justified only by the statement that it is volume-suppressed because no current-enhanced diagram contributes. No numerical test of this suppression is given, yet the inference that N-rho is the dominant contaminant is drawn from the difference between the standard and this incomplete GEVP-improved correlator. Without demonstrating that the omitted term is negligible for the chosen values of t and tau, the flat plateau in Fig. 2 could be an artefact of an uncontrolled truncation rather than evidence that the physical N-rho state has been removed.
[Nucleon vector matrix elements and Appendix B] The central numerical demonstration rests on a single subset of 400 gauge configurations at m_pi=429 MeV and L=24a, with the GEVP analysis shown for one value of t0=3a, no statistical uncertainty bands, no t0 variation, and no systematic check of the fit or operator basis. The claim that excited-state contamination is 'exponentially reduced' is drawn visually from one plot. Since the paper claims a general framework valid across channels and pion masses, either additional ensembles, multiple t0 choices, or a clear statement that the general claim is a prediction supported only by a single proof-of-principle is needed.

minor comments (3)

[Introduction, Eq. (1)] The notation 'OH and bar-OH' in the text is confusing; the sink interpolator should be written as O_H^dagger(p',t) or an equivalent explicit Hermitian conjugation, especially because Eq. (1) then uses O_H^dagger(p,0) inconsistently.
[Eq. (17)] The double-bracket notation <<...>>_F denoting the gauge average of the Wick contraction is not defined in the text; it should be introduced explicitly.
[Figure 2] The figure would benefit from error bands on the ratios and from a clear statement of how the statistical uncertainty is estimated, since the main claim of 'exponentially reduced' contamination is currently based on visual inspection of point values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central criterion is derived from Wick-contraction structure and translational invariance, with predictions tested against ChPT and independent lattice calculations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in any load-bearing sense. The key mechanism—that quark-line disconnected diagrams are enhanced by the spatial volume when the meson momentum matches the current momentum transfer—is derived from the explicit Wick-contraction expressions in Eqs. (10)-(12) and translational invariance in the non-interacting limit. This is an independent theoretical argument, not a fit or a renaming of the data it explains. The identification of current-enhanced states (e.g. Nρ, Nσ, Nπ) is then tested against external constraints: ChPT expectations for the axial channel, published lattice results, and a new GEVP variational analysis in Appendix B. The partially quenched framework [15] is invoked to motivate the contraction-to-state mapping, but it is an external framework rather than a self-citation, and even if the mapping is not rigorously proven here, that is a correctness or assumption risk, not circularity. The author's own prior work [14,16,18] is cited for numerical evidence and methodology, but those are separate published calculations and not the sole support for the central claim. No equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore the paper merits a low circularity score, with the caveat that the partially quenched mapping deserves further scrutiny on external-validity grounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data in this paper; the masses quoted are inputs from earlier analyses. The central claim relies on standard lattice QCD axioms (spectral decomposition, GEVP), current-meson dominance and current algebra as external phenomenological input, and a partially quenched mapping between Wick contractions and physical states. No new particles, forces, dimensions or conserved quantities are introduced; 'current-enhanced state' is a label for known hadron-plus-meson states such as N pi, N sigma and N rho.

assumptions (5)

standard math Spectral decomposition of the three-point function, Eq. (2), with exponentially suppressed excited-state contributions in the asymptotic limit.
The argument and all examples rely on this expansion of C3pt in hadronic intermediate states.
domain assumption The GEVP, Eq. (4), gives improved operators that isolate the state H with systematic errors controlled by energy gaps [12,13].
The improved three-point functions in Eqs. (5)-(6) are the tool used to test the criterion; the truncated-basis approximation is inherited from the cited GEVP literature.
domain assumption Current-meson dominance and current algebra determine which meson a given current predominantly creates (vector current creates rho-like states, axial current creates pion/a1-like states, scalar current creates sigma/pi-pi S-wave).
This external phenomenological input selects the candidate enhanced states; the paper explicitly says the argument is 'inspired by current-meson dominance'.
domain assumption A partially quenched framework maps each Wick contraction topology to a specific intermediate state in the spectral decomposition [15].
The paper invokes this mapping to go from large disconnected diagrams to physical states such as N pi and N rho; it is assumed rather than derived.
ad hoc to paper The spatial-volume enhancement O(L^3) derived in the non-interacting limit persists in interacting finite-volume QCD and at the moderate time separations used in present-day analyses.
The O(100) enhancement and its volume scaling are presented as confirmed by cited and private two-volume comparisons, but the scaling argument itself is non-interacting.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Current-Enhanced Excited States in Lattice QCD Three-Point Functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XEGSNGPU

@misc{pith2026250809006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Current-Enhanced Excited States in Lattice QCD Three-Point Functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XEGSNGPU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09006}
}

read the original abstract

Excited-state contamination remains one of the leading sources of systematic uncertainty in the precise determination of hadron structure observables from lattice QCD. In this letter, we present a general argument, inspired by current-meson dominance and implemented through the variational method, to identify which excited states are enhanced by the choice of the inserted current and kinematics. The argument is supported by numerical evidence across multiple hadronic channels and provides both a conceptual understanding and practical guidance to account for excited-state effects in hadron three-point function analyses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09006 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (left) Comparison between standard ratios and GEVP-improved ratios in the forward limit (top) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

SCET sum rules for $B\to D_1(2420)$ and $B\to D_1'(2430)$ form factors at next-to-leading order
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

First O(αs) SCET light-cone sum rules for B o D1 and B o D1' form factors yield R(D1)=0.070+0.028-0.018 and R(D1')=0.159+0.032-0.025.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[15]

Parton degrees of freedom in pdfs from the hadronic tensor and large momentum effective theory

Keh-Fei Liu. Parton degrees of freedom in pdfs from the hadronic tensor and large momentum effective theory. Phys. Rev. D , 102:074502, Oct 2020

work page 2020
[14]

Nuc- leon sigma terms with a variational analysis from Lattice QCD

Lorenzo Barca, Gunnar Bali, and Sara Collins. Nuc- leon sigma terms with a variational analysis from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D , 111(3):L031505, 2025

work page 2025
[1]

J. J. Sakurai. Theory of strong interactions. Annals Phys., 11:1–48, 1960

work page 1960
[2]

Currents and Mesons

J.J.Sakurai. Currents and Mesons. UniversityofChicago Press, 1969

work page 1969
[3]

N. M. Kroll, T. D. Lee, and B. Zumino. Neutral Vec- tor Mesons and the Hadronic Electromagnetic Current. Phys. Rev., 157:1376–1399, 1967

work page 1967
[4]

R. J. Oakes and J. J. Sakurai. Spectral-Function Sum Rules, omega- phi Mixing, and Lepton-Pair Decays of Vector Mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 19:1266–1270, 1967

work page 1967
[5]

Form- factors and vector mesons

Murray Gell-Mann and Fredrik Zachariasen. Form- factors and vector mesons. Phys. Rev. , 124:953–964, 1961

work page 1961
[6]

Meissner

Ulf G. Meissner. Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Ef- fective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons. Phys. Rept., 161:213, 1988

work page 1988

Show all 38 references

[7]

Preciserelationsbetweenthespectraof vector and axial vector mesons.Phys

StevenWeinberg. Preciserelationsbetweenthespectraof vector and axial vector mesons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 18:507– 509, 1967

1967
[8]

Stephen L. Adler. Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current. Phys. Rev., 137:B1022–B1033, 1965

1965
[9]

Stephen L. Adler. Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial-vector 6 current. II. Phys. Rev., 139:B1638–B1643, 1965

1965
[10]

Cabibbo, and L

Guido Altarelli, N. Cabibbo, and L. Maiani. The sigma term and low-energy pi-n scattering. Nucl. Phys. B , 34:621–631, 1971

1971
[11]

Bernard, Norbert Kaiser, and Ulf-G

V. Bernard, Norbert Kaiser, and Ulf-G. Meissner. Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E , 4:193–346, 1995

1995
[12]

On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory

Benoit Blossier, Michele Della Morte, Georg von Hippel, Tereza Mendes, and Rainer Sommer. On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory. JHEP, 04:094, 2009

2009
[13]

On the computation of hadron-to-hadron transition mat- rix elements in lattice QCD.JHEP, 01:140, 2012

John Bulava, Michael Donnellan, and Rainer Sommer. On the computation of hadron-to-hadron transition mat- rix elements in lattice QCD.JHEP, 01:140, 2012

2012
[16]

Progress on nucleon transition matrix elements with a lattice QCD variational analysis

Lorenzo Barca, Gunnar Bali, and Sara Collins. Progress on nucleon transition matrix elements with a lattice QCD variational analysis. PoS, EuroPLEx2023:002, 2024

2024
[17]

Future methods for studying confined gluons in QCD

yielded improvements only where current-enhanced diagrams contribute, while having little effect elsewhere. In practical terms, our findings motivate the targeted in- clusion of current-induced multi-hadron states in multi- state fits, and provide a clear operator-selection cr...
[18]

Investigation of pion- nucleon contributions to nucleon matrix elements.Phys

Constantia Alexandrou, Giannis Koutsou, Yan Li, Mar- cus Petschlies, and Ferenc Pittler. Investigation of pion- nucleon contributions to nucleon matrix elements.Phys. Rev. D, 110(9):094514, 2024

2024
[19]

Toward N to Nπ matrix elements from lattice QCD.Phys

Lorenzo Barca, Gunnar Bali, and Sara Collins. Toward N to Nπ matrix elements from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 107(5):L051505, 2023

2023
[20]

Method for high-precision determination of the nucleon axial structure using lattice QCD: RemovingπN-state contamination

Yasumichi Aoki, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoshinobu Kur- amashi, Shoichi Sasaki, Kohei Sato, Eigo Shintani, Ry- utaro Tsuji, Hiromasa Watanabe, and Takeshi Yamazaki. Method for high-precision determination of the nucleon axial structure using lattice QCD: RemovingπN-state contaminati...

2025
[21]

Investigating the axial structure of the nucleon based on large-volume lattice QCD at the physical point

Ryutaro Tsuji, Yasumichi Aoki, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Shoichi Sasaki, Kohei Sato, Eigo Shintani, Hiromasa Watanabe, and Takeshi Yamazaki. Investigating the axial structure of the nucleon based on large-volume lattice QCD at the physical point. 5 2025

2025
[22]

G. S. Bali, S. Collins, M. Gruber, A. Schäfer, P. Wein, and T. Wurm. Solving the PCAC puzzle for nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors. Phys. Lett. B , 789:666– 674, 2019

2019
[23]

Axial Vector Form Factors from Lat- tice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation.Phys

Yong-Chull Jang, Rajan Gupta, Boram Yoon, and Tan- moy Bhattacharya. Axial Vector Form Factors from Lat- tice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(7):072002, 2020

2020
[24]

Bali, Lorenzo Barca, Sara Collins, Michael Gruber, Marius Löffler, Andreas Schäfer, Wolfgang Söld- ner, PhilippWein, SimonWeishäupl, andThomasWurm

Gunnar S. Bali, Lorenzo Barca, Sara Collins, Michael Gruber, Marius Löffler, Andreas Schäfer, Wolfgang Söld- ner, PhilippWein, SimonWeishäupl, andThomasWurm. Nucleon axial structure from lattice QCD.JHEP, 05:126, 2020

2020
[25]

Nπ-state contamination in lattice calcula- tions of the nucleon axial form factors

Oliver Bar. Nπ-state contamination in lattice calcula- tions of the nucleon axial form factors. Phys. Rev. D , 99(5):054506, 2019

2019
[26]

Nπ-state contamination in lattice calcula- tions of the nucleon pseudoscalar form factor.Phys

Oliver Bar. Nπ-state contamination in lattice calcula- tions of the nucleon pseudoscalar form factor.Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):054507, 2019

2019
[27]

Brian C. Tiburzi. Chiral Corrections to Nucleon Two- and Three-Point Correlation Functions. Phys. Rev. D , 91:094510, 2015

2015
[28]

Hansen and Harvey B

Maxwell T. Hansen and Harvey B. Meyer. On the ef- fect of excited states in lattice calculations of the nucleon axial charge. Nucl. Phys. B , 923:558–587, 2017

2017
[29]

Hall et al

Zack B. Hall et al. Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite- Volume Corrections togA. 3 2025

2025
[30]

Review of particle phys- ics

Particle Data Group. Review of particle phys- ics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , 2020(8):083C01, 08 2020

2020
[31]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, C. Iona, G. Koutsou, Y. Li, and G. Spanoudes. Nucleon charges and σ-terms in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D , 111(5):054505, 2025

2025
[32]

Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, and Hart- mut Wittig

Andria Agadjanov, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hip- pel, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, and Hart- mut Wittig. Nucleon Sigma Terms with Nf=2+1 Flavors of O(a)-Improved Wilson Fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 131(26):261902, 2023

2023
[33]

Barca, G

L. Barca, G. Bali, S. Collins, and M. Rodekamp. In preparation
[34]

Pion–Nucleon Sigma Term from Lattice QCD

Rajan Gupta, Sungwoo Park, Martin Hoferichter, Emanuele Mereghetti, Boram Yoon, and Tanmoy Bhat- tacharya. Pion–Nucleon Sigma Term from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(24):242002, 2021

2021
[35]

Bπ excited-state contamination in lattice calculations of B- meson correlation functions

Oliver Bar, Alexander Broll, and Rainer Sommer. Bπ excited-state contamination in lattice calculations of B- meson correlation functions. Eur. Phys. J. C , 83(8):757, 2023

2023
[36]

Alexei Bazavov et al.Bs →Kℓν decay from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D , 100(3):034501, 2019

2019
[37]

Edwards and Balint Joo

Robert G. Edwards and Balint Joo. The Chroma soft- ware system for lattice QCD.Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 140:832, 2005

2005
[38]

Prelovsek, U

S. Prelovsek, U. Skerbis, and C. B. Lang. Lattice oper- ators for scattering of particles with spin.JHEP, 01:129, 2017. 7 Appendix A: T opologies of Wick contractions D−1(z, 0)D−1(x, z) OH(x) D−1(x, y) J (z) OM(y) O† H(0) WC D−1(y, z) D−1(x, 0) OH(x) OM(y) O† H(0) J (z) WD Fig...

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

Parton degrees of freedom in pdfs from the hadronic tensor and large momentum effective theory

Keh-Fei Liu. Parton degrees of freedom in pdfs from the hadronic tensor and large momentum effective theory. Phys. Rev. D , 102:074502, Oct 2020

work page 2020

[2] [14]

Nuc- leon sigma terms with a variational analysis from Lattice QCD

Lorenzo Barca, Gunnar Bali, and Sara Collins. Nuc- leon sigma terms with a variational analysis from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D , 111(3):L031505, 2025

work page 2025

[3] [1]

J. J. Sakurai. Theory of strong interactions. Annals Phys., 11:1–48, 1960

work page 1960

[4] [2]

Currents and Mesons

J.J.Sakurai. Currents and Mesons. UniversityofChicago Press, 1969

work page 1969

[5] [3]

N. M. Kroll, T. D. Lee, and B. Zumino. Neutral Vec- tor Mesons and the Hadronic Electromagnetic Current. Phys. Rev., 157:1376–1399, 1967

work page 1967

[6] [4]

R. J. Oakes and J. J. Sakurai. Spectral-Function Sum Rules, omega- phi Mixing, and Lepton-Pair Decays of Vector Mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 19:1266–1270, 1967

work page 1967

[7] [5]

Form- factors and vector mesons

Murray Gell-Mann and Fredrik Zachariasen. Form- factors and vector mesons. Phys. Rev. , 124:953–964, 1961

work page 1961

[8] [6]

Meissner

Ulf G. Meissner. Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Ef- fective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons. Phys. Rept., 161:213, 1988

work page 1988