Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The paper claims that dark Higgs-strahlung with and without an initial-state photon gives observable displaced-vertex signatures at Belle II in parameter regions that existing dark-photon and Higgs-mixing searches still allow.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Dark Higgs-strahlung, with or without an initial-state photon, gives a displaced-vertex plus missing-energy signature that could make Belle II more sensitive to dark photon models than single-photon searches alone.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely new channel and a clever kinematic variable, but the projected Belle II reach rests on a flat mock background, so the headline sensitivity is conditional. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.09247 v1 pith:2PNH4AXM submitted 2025-08-12 hep-ph

Dark Higgs-strahlung at Belle II: A distinctive dark sector signature with displaced vertices and missing energy

Francesca Acanfora , Felix Kahlhoefer This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords dark Higgs-strahlungdark photondisplaced vertexmissing energyHiggs mixingBelle IIdark matter relic abundanceinitial-state radiation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes two previously unexplored final states for discovering a dark sector in which the dark photon gets its mass from a dark Higgs boson: dark Higgs-strahlung alone ($e^+e^-\to \phi\chi\bar\chi$) and the same process accompanied by an initial-state photon. In both cases the dark Higgs decays to Standard Model particles at a displaced vertex while the dark photon's daughters escape as missing energy. The kinematic structure of each process creates sharp peaks--in the missing invariant mass for the isolated channel, and in a product variable $v=(E_\gamma-\bar E)(m_{\chi\bar\chi}-m_{A'})$ for the photon channel--that allow strong background rejection. Using expected Belle II data at $50\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$, the authors find that both channels yield observable signals in currently allowed parameter regions for all three mass benchmarks considered. If correct, this would extend collider coverage of dark sectors into a previously unsearched corner.

Core claim

The central claim is that dark Higgs-strahlung, with or without an ISR photon, produces a distinctive detectable signature at Belle II: a displaced vertex from the long-lived dark Higgs boson plus missing energy from the invisible dark photon decay. Because the dark photon can be on-shell, the radiative process has a cross section only about an order of magnitude below the non-radiative one, much larger than a simple factor-of-$\alpha$ expectation. The signal exhibits resonant peaking structures that are condensed into the variable $v$, so signal events cluster near $v=0$ while smooth backgrounds do not. The authors therefore argue that a bump hunt in $m_{\chi\bar\chi}$ or in $v$, with a win

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of on-shell dark-photon propagator peaks, combined into the single variable $v=(E_\gamma-\bar E)(m_{\chi\bar\chi}-m_{A'})$, where $\bar E=(s-m_{A'}^2)/(2\sqrt{s})$. In $\phi$ production, the missing invariant mass $m_{\chi\bar\chi}$ peaks at $m_{A'}$; in $\gamma\phi$ production, the same peak occurs when the second dark photon is on shell, while a peak in $E_\gamma$ at $\bar E$ occurs when the first one is. The product variable sends both branches to $v=0$, separating signal from smooth mock backgrounds. The displaced-vertex requirement enters through the decay-probability factor $\exp(-r_{\mathrm{in}}/d)-\exp(-r_{\mathrm{out}}/d)$, so the final event rate

Load-bearing premise

The projected reach rests on an assumed smooth background with an arbitrary normalisation and on the assumption that every signal event passes the trigger; if the true Belle II background in the 2--9 mm region is larger or has kinematic peaks near the signal, or if the trigger misses low-mass events, the claimed sensitivity would shrink or disappear.

What would settle it

A Belle II search for displaced vertices in the 2--9 mm radial region with $50\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$: if, after scanning $m_{A'}$, no excess is seen in the $m_{\chi\bar\chi}$ window around $m_{A'}$ or in the $v$ variable near zero beyond the measured background, the paper's claim of observable signals in currently allowed parameter regions would be contradicted for those masses and couplings.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At $50\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$, Belle II can probe kinetic mixing values below the existing BaBar invisible-dark-photon bound, with the largest gains at larger dark-sector masses.
  • Both the $\phi$ and $\gamma\phi$ channels can be observed together; the invariant mass of the displaced-vertex decay products gives $m_\phi$, while $m_{\chi\bar\chi}$ and $v$ give $m_{A'}$, enabling reconstruction of the dark-sector spectrum.
  • Because the selection windows tighten when the background grows, the sensitivity loss between $N_b=1$ and $N_b=10^4$ is only a factor of 3--5, far milder than the factor of 10 expected from a simple cut-and-count analysis.
  • The model can explain the dark matter relic abundance for GeV-scale dark matter through loop-level $\chi\bar\chi\to\phi\phi$ annihilation with $g_\chi\sim 1$, the same coupling regime that makes the collider signals sizeable.
  • The reach in the Higgs-mixing plane extends into currently allowed regions for all three benchmarks, while the high-$\theta$ end is cut off by the dark Higgs decaying too promptly to give a displaced vertex.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the real $\gamma\phi$ background is smaller than the assumed $0.22\times N_b$ scaling, the radiative channel could become the discovery channel; the paper's mock-background freedom means the relative power of the two channels is not fixed.
  • The $v$ variable is a transferable template: any process with two propagator resonances in different kinematic variables can be folded into a single peak, which could benefit other displaced-vertex searches at future colliders.
  • A dedicated displaced-vertex trigger would likely extend the $\phi$-channel sensitivity to low dark-photon masses where tracks are feeble, a regime the present analysis does not cover because it assumes all signal events pass the trigger.
  • A null result could set simultaneous bounds on both $\epsilon$ and $\theta$ in the same scan, since the signal rate depends on their product through the cross section and the decay-length probability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes new Belle II searches for dark Higgs-strahlung, e+e− → A′∗ → φχχ and its radiative counterpart with an ISR photon, in a dark sector with a dark photon, a dark Higgs boson, and Dirac-fermion dark matter. Signal events are generated with MadGraph, and the dark Higgs decay is restricted to the uninstrumented radial region 2–9 mm. Since a first-principles background estimate is declared impossible, the background is generated with RAMBO at arbitrary normalization Nb and then varied between 1 and 10^4 events at 50 ab−1. A new kinematic variable v is introduced to combine the mχχ and Eγ resonances of the γφ channel. The resulting 95% CL sensitivity curves for three benchmark mass hierarchies are presented in Fig. 11 and efficiency tables, and the paper concludes that both φ and γφ production would be observable in currently allowed parameter regions. The relic abundance is addressed via loop annihilation χχ → φφ, which motivates gχ ≃ 1.

Significance. If the sensitivity projection is robust, this is a genuinely new final state for sub-GeV dark sectors and could complement existing dark-photon and Higgs-mixing searches. The kinematic analysis is careful, the use of the variable v is novel and well motivated, and the paper is honest about its main caveats, including the arbitrary background normalization and the trigger assumption. The signal simulation with MadGraph and the detailed efficiency tables are useful strengths. However, the central quantitative claim is built on a mock background whose shape—not just normalization—is unconstrained, and the trigger/efficiency assumptions are not quantified. These issues are load-bearing for the statement that both channels are observable in currently allowed regions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 6] The central sensitivity claim rests on a background model that is arbitrary in both normalization and shape. Sec. 3.2 states that backgrounds are 'generated with a purely phenomenological background distribution with an arbitrary normalisation,' and Fig. 11 varies Nb from 1 to 10^4. Varying the normalization does not test whether the real Belle II background has kinematic peaks in mχχ, Eγ, or v close to the signal. The inelastic dark matter search [13] already shows this signature is not background-free, and sources such as photon conversions, Ks/KL events, and misreconstructed vertices can produce peaked missing-mass distributions. The fixed γφ/φ background ratio of 0.22, obtained from σ(3γ)/σ(2γ), is a QED proxy for a different final state and is not justified. Since the conclusion in Sec. 6—'both φ and γφ production predict observable signals'—depends directly on the background being
  2. [Sec. 5 and Tables 3–6] The sensitivity estimates assume that every signal event passes the trigger and that no additional reconstruction or vertexing efficiency is applied. The text flags this for φ production with low mφ and high mA′ , where the two tracks from the dark Higgs decay can be feeble, but it does not quantify the effect. The expected signal counts in Tables 3–6 are already small or moderate in several benchmark rows, so a modest trigger or vertex-reconstruction inefficiency could eliminate the 'observable' conclusion for those points. Please either include realistic trigger/vertexing efficiencies or explicitly restrict the discovery claim to parameter regions where the assumption is safe.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.9)] The statistical procedure uses an on-the-fly optimization of the signal window on the same events that define the test statistic, scanning over mA′ and over bins around mχχ or v. The quoted condition −2 log L = 3.84 is a local 95% CL threshold; no trials factor is applied for the multiple mass points and window choices. This overstates the sensitivity of a real search. I would ask the authors to either fix the window using background-only expectations, apply a trials correction, or present the results as local sensitivities with a clear disclaimer. Given that the central figure is the sensitivity projection, this should be corrected or at least quantified in the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.10)] The factor A in the annihilation cross section is said to be of order unity and to depend only on mass ratios, but it is not listed or defined. Since B2 exhibits a partial cancellation, providing a table or formula for A would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The ratio 0.22 between the γφ and φ backgrounds is introduced without a derivation or reference. Even as a proxy, a short explanation or a range around 0.22 would help the reader judge the sensitivity of the γφ channel.
  3. [Fig. 5] The legends in the four panels are small and partly overlapping; consider a single shared caption or larger font. Also, the line colors should be explained in the caption.
  4. [Appendix A.2] The motivation for using sqrt(|v|) rather than v is clear, but it would be helpful to define the variable's range and binning earlier, since v is introduced in Sec. 4.1.
  5. [Throughout] Minor text issues: footnote 3 contains 'resect' (probably 'respect'), and the caption of Fig. 12 has 'negligble' (should be 'negligible').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: signal predictions come from an independent matrix-element simulation, and the projected reach is an openly conditional sensitivity study, not a fit.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a sensitivity projection, not a parameter inference from data. Signal events are generated in MadGraph from an existing UFO model (Ref. [20], external to the authors) with matrix elements containing the dark-photon propagator poles; the cross sections are computed, not fitted. The variable v in Eq. (4.8) is a matched-filter statistic built from the expected resonance conditions, and the paper explicitly notes that 'the construction of v requires a choice of mA′' and that an analysis 'still requires a scan over mA′ in the same way as a bump hunt in Eγ'. Scanning over a hypothesized mass is standard bump-hunting practice and does not make the predicted peak at v=0 an input. The relic-abundance calculation (Eqs. 2.10–2.13) is used only as motivation: the authors 'take a more agnostic approach and simply fix gχ = 1', then check consistency in Fig. 3; no parameter is fitted to force observability. The mock background is admittedly arbitrary ('we generate a purely phenomenological background distribution with an arbitrary normalisation'), and the normalization is varied over Nb ∈ [1,10^4] rather than tuned to produce a signal; the residual dependence on the background shape is a correctness/robustness limitation, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [17] and [29]) are a review of external experimental constraints and a proposed trigger; the trigger dependence is explicitly flagged ('our sensitivity estimates can only be fully realized once a displaced vertex trigger has been implemented'), so the argument does not reduce to a self-citation. No equation is defined in terms of its target, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The main inputs are model choices (benchmark mass ratios, gχ=1), phenomenological background assumptions, and detector simplifications; the paper is transparent about all of these.

free parameters (2)
  • gχ (dark gauge coupling to χ) = 1 (chosen)
    Fixed to 1 for the analysis; the paper argues results are insensitive to it in the allowed range and that relic abundance requires gχ ~ O(1). Not fitted to data.
  • Background normalization Nb per process = varied 1 to 10^4
    Number of expected background events in the φ channel is an arbitrary input; sensitivities are quoted for the extremes. The γφ background is set to 0.22 Nb via a QED proxy ratio.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The dark sector consists of a dark photon, a dark Higgs, and a fermionic dark matter particle with U(1)' gauge symmetry spontaneously broken by the dark Higgs VEV.
    Standard dark photon/dark Higgs model, Sec. 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Dark matter does not couple to the dark Higgs boson; it gets a Dirac mass independently.
    This model choice forbids tree-level χbar χ -> φφ and forces loop-level annihilation; it is not required by any principle but is stated in Sec. 2.
  • domain assumption The dark Higgs mixes with the SM Higgs with small angle θ and inherits couplings to SM fermions; decay widths taken from Refs. [16,17] with 'considerable theory uncertainties'.
    Used for lifetime and BRs, Sec. 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Backgrounds can be modeled as phase-space distributed particles with constant matrix element and arbitrary normalization.
    RAMBO mock, Sec. 3.2; authors explicitly state this is not a real background estimate.
  • domain assumption All signal events pass the Belle II trigger; for φ production this requires a dedicated displaced vertex trigger.
    Stated in Sec. 5; the authors note that without such a trigger low-mass φ events with feeble tracks may be lost.
  • domain assumption Detector response can be approximated by Gaussian smearing with resolutions from Ref. [28].
    Appendix A; no full detector simulation.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Higgs-strahlung at Belle II: A distinctive dark sector signature with displaced vertices and missing energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2PNH4AXM

@misc{pith2026250809247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Higgs-strahlung at Belle II: A distinctive dark sector signature with displaced vertices and missing energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2PNH4AXM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09247}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Dark photons with kinetic mixing are compelling mediators for the interactions between dark matter and Standard Model particles. While most experimental searches focus on fully visible or fully invisible decays of dark photons, we explore processes that involve dark Higgs-strahlung, i.e. the emission of a dark Higgs boson connected to the mass generation of the dark photon. If the dark Higgs boson is the lightest dark sector particle, it is expected to be long-lived and decay into Standard Model particles via Higgs mixing. At electron-positron colliders, dark Higgs-strahlung may occur either in isolation (leading to a single displaced vertex and missing energy) or accompanied by a photon from initial-state radiation. Both signatures offer distinctive kinematic features, such as peaks in photon energy or missing invariant mass, which enable efficient background suppression and enhances sensitivity beyond existing searches. Our study suggests that Belle II could significantly improve coverage of dark sector models by targeting this previously unexplored final state and that combining dark Higgs-strahlung events with and without additional photon offers great potential for reconstructing the properties of the dark sector.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Light Vector Dark Matter via a Magnetic Dipole Portal: Bridging Direct Detection and Fixed-Target Searches

    hep-ph 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0

    A sub-GeV vector DM model with a magnetic dipole portal is studied at LDMX/NA64, but the claimed viable region relies on an unjustified thermal equilibrium assumption.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Antel et al.,Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur

    C. Antel et al.,Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023), no. 12 1122, [2305.01715]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys

    B. Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B166 (1986) 196–198

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi,The Dark Photon, 2005.01515

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    Aaij et al.,Searches for low-mass dimuon resonances, JHEP 10 (2020) 156, [2007.03923]

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al.,Searches for low-mass dimuon resonances, JHEP 10 (2020) 156, [2007.03923]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    BaBar, J. P. Lees et al.,Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced ine+e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017), no. 13 131804, [1702.03327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    R. M. Schabinger and J. D. Wells,A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 093007, [hep-ph/0509209]. – 18 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Duerr, A

    M. Duerr, A. Grohsjean, F. Kahlhoefer, B. Penning, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, et al.,Hunting the dark Higgs, JHEP 04 (2017) 143, [1701.08780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson in the $b\bar{b}$ final state using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    A TLAS, G. Aad et al.,Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb¯ Final State Using pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 12 121801, [2407.10549]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    A TLAS, G. Aad et al.,Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into W +W − in the one-lepton final state at√s=13 TeV using 139 fb−1 of pp collisions recorded with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2023) 116, [2211.07175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Search for dark matter particles in W$^+$W$^-$ events with transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    CMS, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Search for dark matter particles in W+W− events with transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2024) 134, [2310.12229]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    A TLAS, G. Aad et al.,Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson Decaying into W ±W ∓ or ZZ in Fully Hadronic Final States from√s = 13 TeV pp Collisions Recorded with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 12 121802, [2010.06548]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    A TLAS, A search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a Higgs boson pair in 3b or 4b final states usingpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, 2507.02175

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Adachi et al.,Search for a dark Higgs boson produced in association with inelastic dark matter at the Belle II experiment, 2505.09705

    Belle-II, I. Adachi et al.,Search for a dark Higgs boson produced in association with inelastic dark matter at the Belle II experiment, 2505.09705

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Adachi et al.,Search for a long-lived spin-0 mediator in b→s transitions at the Belle II experiment, Phys

    Belle-II, I. Adachi et al.,Search for a long-lived spin-0 mediator in b→s transitions at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 11 L111104, [2306.02830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    S. Li, J. M. Yang, M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and R. Zhu,Unraveling dark Higgs mechanism via dark photon production at an e^+ e^- collider, 2506.20208

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    M. W. Winkler,Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 1 015018, [1809.01876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Ferber, A

    T. Ferber, A. Grohsjean, and F. Kahlhoefer,Dark Higgs bosons at colliders, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136 (2024) 104105, [2305.16169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    P. J. Blackstone, J. Tarrús Castellà, E. Passemar, and J. Zupan,Hadronic Decays of a Higgs-mixed Scalar, 2407.13587

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, [1405.0301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Duerr, T

    M. Duerr, T. Ferber, C. Garcia-Cely, C. Hearty, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Long-lived Dark Higgs and Inelastic Dark Matter at Belle II, JHEP 04 (2021) 146, [2012.08595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Abe et al.,Belle II Technical Design Report, 1011.0352

    Belle-II, T. Abe et al.,Belle II Technical Design Report, 1011.0352

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Jaeckel and A

    J. Jaeckel and A. V. Phan,Searching dark photons using displaced vertices at Belle II — with backgrounds, JHEP 08 (2024) 062, [2312.12522]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Ferber, C

    T. Ferber, C. Garcia-Cely, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,BelleII sensitivity to long–lived dark photons, Phys. Lett. B833 (2022) 137373, [2202.03452]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Ecker,Search for a dark Higgs boson produced in association with inelastic dark matter at the Belle II experiment

    P. Ecker,Search for a dark Higgs boson produced in association with inelastic dark matter at the Belle II experiment. PhD thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Snowmass Whitepaper: The Belle II Detector Upgrade Program

    Belle-II, F. Forti,Snowmass Whitepaper: The Belle II Detector Upgrade Program, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022. 2203.11349

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    How to measure the spin of invisible states in $e^+e^- \to \gamma + X$

    M. Bauer and S. N. Erner,How to measure the spin of invisible states in e+e-→γ+X, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 11 115013, [2308.09746]. – 19 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Kleiss, W

    R. Kleiss, W. J. Stirling, and S. D. Ellis,A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies, Comput. Phys. Commun.40 (1986) 359

    work page 1986

  28. [28]

    Altmannshofer et al.,The Belle II Physics Book, PTEP 2019 (2019), no

    Belle-II, W. Altmannshofer et al.,The Belle II Physics Book, PTEP 2019 (2019), no. 12 123C01, [1808.10567]. [Erratum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)]

    arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Duerr, T

    M. Duerr, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, et al.,Invisible and displaced dark matter signatures at Belle II, JHEP 02 (2020) 039, [1911.03176]. A Smearing and binning A.1 Smearing For our analysis we do not run a detailed detector simulation. Instead, we model the resolution on the measurements on all final energies and masses with ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    × 101 3.6 4 .2 × 101 2.4 4 .8 4 .2 × 101 2.9 × 10−1 8

    1.6 × 101 2.3 3 .7 1 .6 × 101 1.5 × 10−1 3.1 × 101 3.3 2 .6 × 101 2.3 4 .3 2 .6 × 101 2.3 × 10−1 5. × 101 3.6 4 .2 × 101 2.4 4 .8 4 .2 × 101 2.9 × 10−1 8. × 101 3.9 6 .3 × 101 2.6 5 .2 6 .2 × 101 3.5 × 10−1 1.2 × 102 4.2 9 .7 × 101 2.7 5 .8 9 .7 × 101 4.3 × 10−1 1.9 × 102 4.5 1 .5 × 102 2.9 6 .2 1 .5 × 102 4.8 × 10−1 3. × 102 4.8 2 .5 × 102 3.2 6 .5 2 .5 ...

    work page

  31. [31]

    × 103 4.2 8 .8 2

    3.7 × 103 3.9 8 .4 3 .7 × 103 7.6 × 10−1 7.4 × 103 6.3 2 . × 103 4.2 8 .8 2 . × 103 7.9 × 10−1 4. × 103 6.6 1 .6 × 103 4.3 9 .2 1 .6 × 103 8.2 × 10−1 3.1 × 103 6.9 1 .7 × 103 4.5 9 .6 1 .7 × 103 8.3 × 10−1 3.3 × 103 7.2 1 .9 × 103 4.8 9 .6 1 .9 × 103 7.9 × 10−1 3.8 × 103 7.5 2 .5 × 103 5.2 9 .6 2 .5 × 103 7.4 × 10−1 5. × 103 T able 3. Efficiency table for...

    work page

  32. [32]

    4.5 × 101 3.4 × 102 5.5 4.2 9 .7 × 101 4.1 4 .3 7

    1.6 × 101 2.9 3 .1 1 .2 × 101 2.1 × 102 6.2 × 10−1 3.3 2 .6 × 101 3.2 3 .4 1 .8 × 101 2.3 × 102 1.3 3.6 4 .2 × 101 3.5 3 .7 2 .9 × 101 2.9 × 102 2.8 3.9 6 .3 × 101 3.8 4 . 4.5 × 101 3.4 × 102 5.5 4.2 9 .7 × 101 4.1 4 .3 7 . × 101 3.9 × 102 1.1 × 101 4.5 1 .5 × 102 4.4 4 .6 1 .2 × 102 5.5 × 102 2.2 × 101 4.8 2 .5 × 102 4.7 4 .9 1 .7 × 102 4.8 × 102 5.1 × 1...

    work page

  33. [33]

    × 103 3.3 × 103 6.3 2

    3.7 × 103 5.8 6 .2 3 .1 × 103 1. × 103 3.3 × 103 6.3 2 . × 103 6.1 6 .6 1 .7 × 103 1.1 × 103 1.3 × 103 6.6 1 .6 × 103 6.4 6 .9 1 .3 × 103 1.1 × 103 8.8 × 102 6.9 1 .7 × 103 6.7 7 .2 1 .4 × 103 1.2 × 103 9.3 × 102 7.2 1 .9 × 103 7. 7.4 1 .5 × 103 9.2 × 102 1.2 × 103 7.5 2 .5 × 103 7.2 7 .8 2 .1 × 103 1.2 × 103 1.7 × 103 T able 4. Efficiency table for event...

    work page

  34. [34]

    × 10−2 11

    5.8 0 .99 5 .7 8 . × 10−2 11. 3.3 8 .3 0 .99 8 .2 8 .4 × 10−2 16. 3.6 12 . 0.99 11 . 8.8 × 10−2 22. 3.9 16 . 0.99 15 . 9.1 × 10−2 30. 4.2 22 . 1.3 22 . 0.13 42 . 4.5 30 . 1.3 30 . 0.13 58 . 4.8 45 . 1.3 44 . 0.13 86 . 5.1 72 . 1.7 71 . 0.18 1 .4 × 102 5.4 1 .2 × 102 3.7 1 .2 × 102 0.22 2 .4 × 102 5.7 2 .7 × 102 2.8 2 .7 × 102 0.22 5 .3 × 102

    work page

  35. [35]

    × 102 6.9 1 .5 × 102 1.7 1 .5 × 102 0.18 2 .9 × 102 7.2 1 .5 × 102 1.7 1 .5 × 102 0.18 3

    3.7 × 102 2.8 3 .7 × 102 0.22 7 .5 × 102 6.3 2 .1 × 102 2.8 2 .1 × 102 0.22 4 .2 × 102 6.6 1 .5 × 102 2.2 1 .5 × 102 0.21 3 . × 102 6.9 1 .5 × 102 1.7 1 .5 × 102 0.18 2 .9 × 102 7.2 1 .5 × 102 1.7 1 .5 × 102 0.18 3 . × 102 7.5 1 .6 × 102 1.7 1 .6 × 102 0.17 3 .3 × 102 T able 5. Efficiency table for events from Benchmark 1 for the processe−e+ → γϕχ ¯χ. The...

    work page

  36. [36]

    0.27 6 .2 1 .3 × 102 0.29 3.9 16

    5.8 0 .27 3 .3 1 .2 × 102 9.1 × 10−2 3.3 8 .3 0 .27 4 .5 1 .2 × 102 0.16 3.6 12 . 0.27 6 .2 1 .3 × 102 0.29 3.9 16 . 0.35 10 . 1.9 × 102 0.51 4.2 22 . 0.35 13 . 1.9 × 102 0.88 4.5 30 . 0.35 17 . 1.9 × 102 1.5 4.8 45 . 0.35 24 . 1.8 × 102 3. 5.1 72 . 0.45 46 . 2.8 × 102 6.9 5.4 1 .2 × 102 0.45 79 . 2.7 × 102 19. 5.7 2 .7 × 102 0.45 1 .6 × 102 2.7 × 102 72

    work page

  37. [37]

    6.6 1 .5 × 102 0.59 1 .1 × 102 3.8 × 102 27

    3.7 × 102 0.59 2 .8 × 102 4.1 × 102 1.3 × 102 6.3 2 .1 × 102 0.45 1 .2 × 102 2.5 × 102 48. 6.6 1 .5 × 102 0.59 1 .1 × 102 3.8 × 102 27. 6.9 1 .5 × 102 0.59 1 .1 × 102 3.7 × 102 26. 7.2 1 .5 × 102 0.59 1 .1 × 102 3.5 × 102 28. 7.5 1 .6 × 102 0.59 1 .2 × 102 3.4 × 102 34. T able 6. Efficiency table for events from Benchmark 1 for the processe−e+ → γϕχ ¯χ. T...

    work page

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.