Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 75 references

A new survey maps quantum-enhanced measurement systems onto particle physics and cosmology targets, arguing these technologies have reached the point where they can improve searches for dark matter, gravitational waves, and cosmic signals.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A survey of quantum-enhanced measurement technologies and their proposed applications to particle physics and cosmology, with a forward-looking discussion of new detector ideas.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A review that might be a useful map of quantum-enhanced detectors, but the abstract alone doesn't show coverage or critical assessment — verify before citing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.10325 v1 pith:VHFM3PNN submitted 2025-08-14 physics.ins-det astro-ph.IMhep-exquant-ph

Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology

Masashi Hazumi This is my paper
classification physics.ins-det astro-ph.IMhep-exquant-ph
keywords quantum measurementquantum sensorssuperconducting quantum sensorsatom interferometryquantum spin sensorsparticle physicscosmologydetector R&D
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper argues that a class of quantum-enhanced detector technologies — superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors — has matured enough to become genuinely useful for particle physics and cosmology. It surveys current and emerging devices, catalogs recent proposals, and identifies where quantum resources such as squeezing, entanglement, and superposition could give experimental gains beyond classical sensing limits. The motivating observation is that industrial investment in quantum computing and quantum communication has accelerated detector R&D, and the author contends these advances have 'excellent potential' for frontier physics experiments. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as a structured claim: the field has reached a turning point where quantum measurement systems are no longer laboratory curiosities but practical detector candidates for fundamental physics.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum measurement systems employing enhancements not previously adopted in experimental physics — in particular superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometers, and quantum spin sensors — are now being proposed for and applied to particle physics and cosmology. It frames these technologies as a coherent family: each uses controlled quantum states to beat the classical sensitivity floors of conventional detectors. The review maps specific detector concepts to specific physics targets, such as dark matter searches, neutrino physics, gravitational wave detection, and cosmological surveys, and argues that the technologies carry 'excellent potential' to i

What carries the argument

The central object is the quantum measurement system: a detector whose sensitivity is enhanced by quantum resources, usually superposition, entanglement, or squeezing. The three named families are superconducting quantum sensors (devices whose quantum states, such as qubits or Josephson-junction dynamics, transduce external signals), atom interferometry (matter-wave interference that measures accelerations, rotations, or forces), and quantum spin sensors (magnetometers and related devices that read out ensembles or single spins). What does the work: these devices are proposed as replacements or complements to classical sensors in specific experiments, with the quantum enhancement providing a

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that quantum enhancement is the limiting factor in the target experiments — that improvements from squeezed, entangled, or superposition-based sensing are not erased by classical noise, systematic errors, or detector inefficiencies in realistic particle physics and cosmology settings.

What would settle it

Build a quantum-enhanced detector (e.g., an atom interferometer for gravitational wave detection or a superconducting qubit sensor for dark matter) and run it in a realistic experimental environment; if its sensitivity is limited by classical disorder, magnetic field gradients, or technical noise rather than by quantum projection noise, the survey's core claim that quantum enhancement will deliver 'excellent potential' in these applications is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the survey is right, several next-generation experiments in dark matter, neutrino physics, and gravitational wave detection could see sensitivity improvements by adopting quantum-enhanced readout or sensing schemes.
  • The transfer of industrial quantum technology (from computing and communication) into experimental physics could become a deliberate pipeline, lowering the cost and risk of developing new detectors.
  • Superconducting quantum sensors could enable searches for low-mass dark matter candidates and single-photon-level signals that are currently invisible to conventional detectors.
  • Atom interferometry could provide new probes of gravitational waves and violations of fundamental symmetries, complementing laser interferometers with a different frequency window.
  • Quantum spin sensors could open compact, high-sensitivity magnetometers useful for measuring faint cosmological or particle-physics signals in constrained environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the review leaves implicit: the strongest near-term payoff is likely in low-frequency precision measurements (e.g., dark matter haloscopes, axion searches, gravitational-wave low band) where quantum enhancement is not erased by thermal noise or backgrounds, whereas in high-energy collider settings classical backgrounds may dominate.
  • Because the survey organizes the field, it implicitly suggests a testable roadmap: one could compare the projected sensitivity curves of quantum-enhanced detectors against classical detectors for a specific target (e.g., axion dark matter) to identify where the quantum advantage actually survives.
  • The success of these detectors may hinge on integrating quantum sensors with existing cryogenic and vacuum infrastructure, a practical concern the review acknowledges only by framing the technologies as 'emerging.'
  • If commercial quantum computing hardware reaches higher coherence times, the same qubit-based sensors could become reconfigurable detectors, a direction the paper's industrial-motivation framing points toward but does not explicitly pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The submitted manuscript, arXiv:2508.10325, is a review article intended to survey quantum measurement technologies—superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors—and their proposed applications in particle physics and cosmology. The abstract states that these technologies have 'excellent potential' and that new proposals exist to apply them to fundamental physics. The full text supplied for review is empty: no sections, equations, figures, tables, or references are present. Consequently, the paper's actual content cannot be evaluated, and all technical and coverage claims remain unverifiable.

Significance. If the completed review accurately maps the three named technology families onto concrete particle physics and cosmology targets, it could serve as a useful field-organizing reference, particularly by connecting industrial quantum-technology developments to fundamental-science applications. However, with no full text available, none of this can be assessed. There is no evidence of machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions; the submission as it stands is an abstract-only statement of intent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The body of the manuscript is empty. There are no sections, equations, figures, tables, or references to review. This is the load-bearing issue: the paper's value depends entirely on the accuracy and completeness of its survey of superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors, and none of that content is present in the submitted version.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the quantum measurement systems have 'excellent potential' for particle physics and cosmology and that these are 'new... not previously adopted.' No supporting evidence, comparative analysis, or citation is available. The claim that quantum enhancements will survive classical noise floors and systematics in realistic experimental settings is a physics premise that the abstract merely asserts.
  3. [Coverage claim] The abstract names three technology families as representative of 'currently available and emerging quantum technologies,' but without a reference list or a survey methodology, there is no basis to verify that this selection is representative or that the characterization of the cited literature is accurate. This coverage premise is central to a review and cannot be checked.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is clear as a statement of intent, but it should summarize the actual content of the review once the full text is present. As written, it could describe any tutorial on quantum sensors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the paper is an abstract-level review with no derivation chain to be circular.

full rationale

The submitted full text of arXiv:2508.10325 is empty, and the only available content is the abstract, which states the intent to survey quantum-enhanced detector technologies and their proposed applications in particle physics and cosmology. There is no derivation, no fitted parameter presented as a prediction, and no formal argument that could reduce to its own inputs. A review paper is by construction external: its content is drawn from the literature it surveys, so the circularity burden is near zero. No self-citation is visible in the abstract, and no load-bearing claim is made that would need external support beyond the cited literature. The absence of technical content creates an evidence gap for checking coverage and citation fidelity, but that is a completeness limitation, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review article: it introduces no derivations and therefore no fitted parameters, no new constructs, and no invented entities. The ledger contains only the domain-level premises that motivate the survey.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum-enhanced measurement principles (squeezing, superposition, entanglement) can be engineered into detector systems with sensitivity advantages relevant to particle physics and cosmology.
    This is the motivating premise of the entire survey, appearing in the abstract as 'quantum enhancements not previously adopted' and 'excellent potential of the new quantum measurement systems'. It is asserted rather than derived, and the abstract does not quantify when quantum noise is the limiting floor.
  • domain assumption The surveyed literature is representative and accurately characterized.
    A review's value rests on the completeness and fidelity of its coverage. The abstract lists technology categories but no sources, so this premise is unverifiable from the abstract alone.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VHFM3PNN

@misc{pith2026250810325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum measurement systems and applications to particle physics and cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VHFM3PNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10325}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

There are new detector proposals and R&D that utilize quantum enhancements not previously adopted. Examples include superconducting quantum sensors, atom interferometry, and quantum spin sensors. They are mainly motivated by industrial applications toward quantum computing, secure quantum communication systems, and high-sensitivity sensors. Given the excellent potential of the new quantum measurement systems, there are also new proposals to apply them in particle physics and cosmology. In this review, I survey currently available and emerging quantum technologies and their applications. I then discuss future directions and new proposals for particle physics and cosmology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  3. [3]

    Degen, C

    L. Degen, C. \, F. Reinhard, P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing , Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (3) (2017) 035002. http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02427 arXiv:1611.02427 , https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy , Phys. Rev. A 50 (1) (1994) 67. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67

    doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 1994

  5. [5]

    S. F. Huelga, C. Macchiavello, T. Pellizzari, A. K. Ekert, M. B. Plenio, J. I. Cirac, On the improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3865. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707014 arXiv:quant-ph/9707014 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3865 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3865

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Sichanugrist, H

    T. Sichanugrist, H. Fukuda, T. Moroi, K. Nakayama, S. Chigusa, N. Mizuochi, M. Hazumi, Y. Matsuzaki, Entanglement-enhanced ac magnetometry in the presence of Markovian noise , Phys. Rev. A 111 (4) (2025) 042605. http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21699 arXiv:2410.21699 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042605 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042605

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Chou, et al., Quantum Sensors for High Energy Physics , in: Quantum Sensors for HEP workshop, 2023, pp

    A. Chou, et al., Quantum Sensors for High Energy Physics , in: Quantum Sensors for HEP workshop, 2023, pp. 1--63. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01930 arXiv:2311.01930

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Optica Quantum 2.0 , ``Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition",\ ://www.optica.org/events/topical\_meetings/quantum/

    work page

  9. [9]

    NVIDIA, https://www.nvidia.com/ja-jp/solutions/quantum-computing/

    work page

  10. [10]

    QURECA, https://www.qureca.com/quantum-initiatives-worldwide/

    work page

  11. [11]

    Physics World , ``The Physics World Breakthrough of the Year 2024",\\ https://physicsworld.com/a/two-advances-in-quantum-error-correction-share-the-physics-world-2024-breakthrough-of-the-year/

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Bluvstein, et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays , Nature 626 (7997) (2024) 58--65

    D. Bluvstein, et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays , Nature 626 (7997) (2024) 58--65. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03982 arXiv:2312.03982 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Acharya, et al., Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold , Nature 638 (8052) (2025) 920--926

    R. Acharya, et al., Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold , Nature 638 (8052) (2025) 920--926. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687 arXiv:2408.13687 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    QuEra, Error-corrected quantum computing roadmap, https://www.quera.com/press-releases/quera-computing-releases-a-groundbreaking-roadmap-for-advanced-error-corrected-quantum-computers-pioneering-the-next-frontier-in-quantum-innovation-0 (January 2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    J. M. Thomas, F. I. Yeh, J. H. Chen, J. J. Mambretti, S. J. Kohlert, G. S. Kanter, P. Kumar, Quantum teleportation coexisting with classical communications in optical fiber , Optica 11 (12) (2024) 1700--1707. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10738 arXiv:2404.10738 , https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.540362 doi:10.1364/OPTICA.540362

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Korzh, et al., Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector , Nature Photon

    B. Korzh, et al., Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector , Nature Photon. 14 (4) (2020) 250--255. http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06839 arXiv:1804.06839 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0589-x doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0589-x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    D. V. Reddy, D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, V. B. Verma, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.400751 doi:10.1364/OPTICA.400751

    doi:10.1364/optica.400751

  18. [18]

    B. G. Oripov, D. S. Rampini, J. Allmaras, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, B. Korzh, A. N. McCaughan, A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels , Nature 622 (7984) (2023) 730--734. http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09473 arXiv:2306.09473 , https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06550-2 doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06550-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    High-speed detection of 1550 nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors

    I. Craiciu, et al., High-speed detection of 1550\,\,nm single photons with superconducting nanowire detectors , Optica 10 (2) (2023) 183--190. http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11644 arXiv:2210.11644 , https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.478960 doi:10.1364/OPTICA.478960

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Chiles, et al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope , Phys

    J. Chiles, et al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (23) (2022) 231802. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01582 arXiv:2110.01582 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231802

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    G. G. Taylor, A. B. Walter, B. Korzh, B. Bumble, S. R. Patel, J. P. Allmaras, A. D. Beyer, R. O'Brient, M. D. Shaw, E. E. Wollman, Low-noise single-photon counting superconducting nanowire detectors at infrared wavelengths up to 29 m, Optica 10 (12) (2023) 1672--1678

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    S. Lee, T. Polakovic, W. Armstrong, A. Dibos, T. Draher, N. Pastika, Z.-E. Meziani, V. Novosad, Beam tests of SNSPDs with 120 GeV protons , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1069 (2024) 169956. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13405 arXiv:2312.13405 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2024.169956 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2024.169956

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Kawasaki, Quantum sensing using cold atoms and molecules for nuclear and particle physics https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 (2025)

    A. Kawasaki, Quantum sensing using cold atoms and molecules for nuclear and particle physics https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 (2025). http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424 arXiv:2411.19424 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19424

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Aeppli, K

    A. Aeppli, K. Kim, W. Warfield, M. S. Safronova, J. Ye, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401 Clock with 8 10 ^ - 19 systematic uncertainty , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 023401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401 . ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.023401 2024

  25. [25]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications , Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (3) (2023) 157--169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3

    doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 2023

  26. [26]

    Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3\,\, eV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability , Phys

    C. Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3\,\, eV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (11) (2025) 111002. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15227 arXiv:2408.15227 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.111002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.111002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Sonnenschein, Next generation haloscope searches for axion dark matter with mass > 1 ev,, qUPosium2024, https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/ (December 2024)

    A. Sonnenschein, Next generation haloscope searches for axion dark matter with mass > 1 ev,, qUPosium2024, https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/ (December 2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR , Astrophys. J. 794 (2) (2014) 171, [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 848, 73 (2017)]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2369 arXiv:1403.2369 , https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/171 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Suzuki, et al., The POLARBEAR-2 and the Simons Array Experiment , J

    A. Suzuki, et al., The POLARBEAR-2 and the Simons Array Experiment , J. Low Temp. Phys. 184 (3-4) (2016) 805--810. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07299 arXiv:1512.07299 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-015-1425-4 doi:10.1007/s10909-015-1425-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    R. J. Thornton, et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The polarization-sensitive ACTPol instrument , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 227 (2) (2016) 21. http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06569 arXiv:1605.06569 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21 doi:10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Ade, et al., The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts , JCAP 02 (2019) 056

    P. Ade, et al., The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts , JCAP 02 (2019) 056. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07445 arXiv:1808.07445 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Galitzki, et al., The Simons Observatory: Instrument Overview , Proc

    N. Galitzki, et al., The Simons Observatory: Instrument Overview , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 10708 (2018) 1070804. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.04493 arXiv:1808.04493 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2312985 doi:10.1117/12.2312985

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Essinger-Hileman, et al., CLASS: The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor , Proc

    T. Essinger-Hileman, et al., CLASS: The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153 (2014) 91531I. http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4788 arXiv:1408.4788 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2056701 doi:10.1117/12.2056701

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    J. E. Austermann, et al., SPTpol: an instrument for CMB polarization measurements with the South Pole Telescope , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 8452 (2012) 84521E. http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4970 arXiv:1210.4970 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.927286 doi:10.1117/12.927286

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    J. A. Sobrin, et al., The Design and Integrated Performance of SPT-3G , Astrophys. J. Supp. 258 (2) (2022) 42. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11202 arXiv:2106.11202 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac374f doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac374f

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Hui, et al., BICEP Array: a multi-frequency degree-scale CMB polarimeter , Proc

    H. Hui, et al., BICEP Array: a multi-frequency degree-scale CMB polarimeter , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 10708 (2018) 1070807. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00568 arXiv:1808.00568 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2311725 doi:10.1117/12.2311725

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Joint Analysis of BICEP2/ Keck Array and Planck Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 101301. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00612 arXiv:1502.00612 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.101301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.101301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Bicep/KeckXV: The Bicep3 Cosmic Microwave Background Polarimeter and the First Three-year Data Set , Astrophys. J. 927 (1) (2022) 77. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00482 arXiv:2110.00482 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4886 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4886

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    G\'enova-Santos, et al., QUIJOTE scientific results I

    R. G\'enova-Santos, et al., QUIJOTE scientific results I. Measurements of the intensity and polarisation of the anomalous microwave emission in the Perseus molecular complex , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452 (4) (2015) 4169--4182. http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04491 arXiv:1501.04491 , https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1405 doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1405

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    GroundBIRD : A CMB polarization experiment with MKID arrays

    K. Lee, et al., GroundBIRD: A CMB Polarization Experiment with MKID Arrays , J. Low Temp. Phys. 200 (5-6) (2020) 384--391. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07705 arXiv:2011.07705 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02511-5 doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02511-5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    J. C. Hamilton, et al., QUBIC I: Overview and science program , JCAP 04 (04) (2022) 034. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02213 arXiv:2011.02213 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/034 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Ghosh, et al., Performance forecasts for the primordial gravitational wave detection pipelines for AliCPT-1 , JCAP 10 (2022) 063

    S. Ghosh, et al., Performance forecasts for the primordial gravitational wave detection pipelines for AliCPT-1 , JCAP 10 (2022) 063. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14804 arXiv:2205.14804 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/063 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., A Constraint on Primordial B-modes from the First Flight of the Spider Balloon-borne Telescope , Astrophys. J. 927 (2) (2022) 174. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.13334 arXiv:2103.13334 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac20df doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac20df

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    The EBEX Balloon Borne Experiment - Detectors and Readout

    M. Abitbol, et al., The EBEX Balloon-borne Experiment Detectors and Readout , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 239 (1) (2018) 8. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01018 arXiv:1803.01018 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aae436 doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aae436

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    The large scale polarization explorer (LSPE) for CMB measurements: performance forecast

    G. Addamo, et al., The large scale polarization explorer (LSPE) for CMB measurements: performance forecast , JCAP 08 (2021) 008. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11049 arXiv:2008.11049 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/008 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    N. N. Gandilo, et al., The Primordial Inflation Polarization Explorer (PIPER) , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9914 (2016) 99141J. http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06172 arXiv:1607.06172 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2231109 doi:10.1117/12.2231109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Accelerators in the Universe

    M. Hazumi , Jumping into cmb polarization measurements-a new group at kek-, in: H. Kodama , K. Ioka (Eds.), KEK CosmoPhysics Group Inaugural Conference "Accelerators in the Universe", Vol. 1040 of A.I.P. Conf. Ser., 2008, pp. 78--88. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2981556 doi:10.1063/1.2981556

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2981556 2008

  48. [48]

    Hazumi, Future CMB polarization measurements and Japanese contributions , Prog

    M. Hazumi, Future CMB polarization measurements and Japanese contributions , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 190 (2011) 75--89. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.190.75 doi:10.1143/PTPS.190.75

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.190.75 2011

  49. [49]

    Hazumi, et al., LiteBIRD: a small satellite for the study of B-mode polarization and inflation from cosmic background radiation detection , Proc

    M. Hazumi, et al., LiteBIRD: a small satellite for the study of B-mode polarization and inflation from cosmic background radiation detection , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 8442 (2012) 844219. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926743 doi:10.1117/12.926743

    work page doi:10.1117/12.926743 2012

  50. [50]

    Matsumura , et al., Mission Design of LiteBIRD , J

    T. Matsumura , et al., Mission Design of LiteBIRD , J. Low Temp. Phys. 176 (5-6) (2014) 733--740. http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2847 arXiv:1311.2847 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-013-0996-1 doi:10.1007/s10909-013-0996-1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    litebird: mission overview and design tradeoffs

    T. Matsumura , et al., "litebird: mission overview and design tradeoffs", in: J. Oschmann , Jacobus M., M. Clampin , G. G. Fazio , H. A. MacEwen (Eds.), Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, Vol. 9143 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 2014, p. 91431F. https://doi.or...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2055794 2014

  52. [52]

    Allys, et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , PTEP 2023 (4) (2023) 042F01

    E. Allys, et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , PTEP 2023 (4) (2023) 042F01. http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02773 arXiv:2202.02773 , https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac150 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Abazajian, et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , , (7 2019)

    K. Abazajian, et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , , (7 2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04473 arXiv:1907.04473

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Seljak, M

    U. Seljak, M. Zaldarriaga, Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2054--2057. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609169 arXiv:astro-ph/9609169 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  55. [55]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, A. Stebbins, A Probe of primordial gravity waves and vorticity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2058--2061. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609132 arXiv:astro-ph/9609132 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  56. [56]

    W. Hu , M. White , CMB anisotropies: Total angular momentum method , Phys. Rev. D56 (2) (1997) 596--615. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9702170 arXiv:astro-ph/9702170 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.596 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.596

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  57. [57]

    F. L. Bezrukov, M. Shaposhnikov, The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton , Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703--706. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3755 arXiv:0710.3755 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, C. Tamarit, Standard Model axion seesaw Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke , JCAP 08 (2017) 001. http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01639 arXiv:1610.01639 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/001 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Adam, et al., The NIKA2 large-field-of-view millimetre continuum camera for the 30 m IRAM telescope , Astron

    R. Adam, et al., The NIKA2 large-field-of-view millimetre continuum camera for the 30 m IRAM telescope , Astron. Astrophys. 609 (2018) A115. http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00908 arXiv:1707.00908 , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731503 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731503

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Okada, et al., X-ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Atoms Isolated in Vacuum with Transition Edge Sensors , J

    S. Okada, et al., X-ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Atoms Isolated in Vacuum with Transition Edge Sensors , J. Low Temp. Phys. 200 (5-6) (2020) 445--451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02476-5 doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02476-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02476-5 2020

  61. [61]

    QUP , qUPosium2024,\\ https://conference-indico.kek.jp/event/290/

    work page

  62. [62]

    CERN, the International Conference on Quantum Technology for High-Energy Physics (QT4HEP2025),\\ https://indico.cern.ch/event/1433194/

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    DRD5, dRD5/RDquantum collaboration meeting,\\ https://indico.cern.ch/event/1503433/timetable/\#20250217

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension a review of solutions , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (15) (2021) 153001. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01183 arXiv:2103.01183 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , JCAP 02 (2025) 021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03002 arXiv:2404.03002 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    DRD5, dRD5 / RDquantum - quantum sensor R&D for particle physics, https://drd5.web.cern.ch/index.html

    work page

  67. [67]

    Badurina, et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011

    L. Badurina, et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11755 arXiv:1911.11755 , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Abe, et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100) , Quantum Sci

    M. Abe, et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100) , Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (4) (2021) 044003. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02835 arXiv:2104.02835 , https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abf719 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf719

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    C. R. Mercer, E. N. Montbach, S. D. Christe, R. M. Connerton, D. A. Podolski, M. P. Robinson, M. R. Perez, Quantum sensing for NASA science missions , EPJ Quant. Technol. 12 (1) (2025) 56. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00360-3 doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00360-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00360-3 2025

  70. [70]

    Adachi, et al., Exploration of the polarization angle variability of the Crab Nebula with POLARBEAR and its application to the search for axionlike particles , Phys

    S. Adachi, et al., Exploration of the polarization angle variability of the Crab Nebula with POLARBEAR and its application to the search for axionlike particles , Phys. Rev. D 110 (6) (2024) 063013. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02096 arXiv:2403.02096 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, N. Mizuochi, K. Nakayama, Light dark matter search with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds , JHEP 03 (2025) 083. http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12756 arXiv:2302.12756 , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)083 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Chigusa, M

    S. Chigusa, M. Hazumi, E. D. Herbschleb, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Mizuochi, K. Nakayama, Nuclear spin metrology with nitrogen vacancy center in diamond for axion dark matter detection , Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) (2025) 075028. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07141 arXiv:2407.07141 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.075028 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.075028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    E. D. Herbschleb, S. Chigusa, R. Kawase, H. Kawashima, M. Hazumi, K. Nakayama, N. Mizuochi, Robust sensing via the standard deviation with a quantum sensor , APL Quantum 1 (4) (2024) 046106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223678 doi:10.1063/5.0223678

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0223678 2024

  74. [74]

    , axionLimits, https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

    O’Hare, C. , axionLimits, https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

    work page

  75. [75]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    2015

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.