Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 62 references

The On-shell Gravity Action and Linear Dilaton Holography

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that regulating the Euclidean on-shell action for asymptotically linear dilaton spacetimes with specific boundary counterterms yields a spacetime mass that matches the energy formula of a $T\overline{T}$-deformed…

desk verdict A solid, technically careful holographic renormalization computation for 3D linear dilaton spacetimes, with one unresolved scheme/frame issue that deserves referee attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10998 v2 pith:7LZMPFIC submitted 2025-08-14 hep-th gr-qc

Andrea Dei , Kiarash Naderi , Savdeep Sethi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords holographicrenormalizationlineardilatonspacetimeT-Tbardeformationon-shellactionspherepartitionfunctionAdS3/CFT2boundarycountertermsblackholethermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the Euclidean on-shell gravity action can be made finite for a class of three-dimensional asymptotically linear dilaton spacetimes by adding a precisely chosen set of boundary counterterms. Once the free counterterm coefficient is fixed by requiring a smooth limit to AdS$_3$, the spacetime mass extracted from the action, $E = \frac{n_1 R_\phi^2}{\alpha' R_{\rm AdS}}\left(-1+\sqrt{1+8M n_5 \alpha'/R_\phi^2}\right)$, takes exactly the form predicted for a $T\overline{T}$-deformed two-dimensional CFT. Because these spacetimes arise as NS5-brane/F1-string backgrounds, the result provides a concrete prescription for the string-theory sphere partition function and quantitative evidence that the holographic dual of linear dilaton gravity is a $T\overline{T}$-deformed CFT.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a variational-principle-based holographic renormalization scheme. The boundary action (4.45) is the central object: after the standard gravitational boundary term $S_{\rm GHY}$, the counterterms are restricted to diffeomorphism invariants $\sqrt{h}\,P(e^{2\Phi})$ with $P$ analytic, so that the divergent bulk action is controlled by two coefficients $P_1$ and $P_2$. Requiring stationarity under the prescribed fall-off conditions fixes $P_1=1$, and requiring a smooth $R_\phi\to\infty$ limit to AdS$_3$ fixes $P_2$; the resulting on-shell action is finite and its derivative with respect to the Euclidean time periodicity produces the mass formula whose square-root structure matches the universal $T\overline{T}$ energy formula.

What would settle it

Add a finite boundary term such as $\sqrt{h}\,Q(e^{2\Phi})R^{(2)}$ or a higher-order term $P_3e^{6\Phi}$ to eq. (4.45) and recompute the on-shell action (5.25) and mass (5.31); if the action remains finite and stationary but the mass changes, the $P_2$ fixing is not unique and the claimed match to the $T\overline{T}$ energy formula fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that holographic renormalization extends beyond anti-de Sitter space to asymptotically linear dilaton geometries, provided the boundary action is taken to be the standard gravitational boundary term $S_{\rm GHY}$ plus $\sqrt{h}\,P(e^{2\Phi})$ with analytic $P$: $S_{\rm bound}=S_{\rm GHY}+\frac{2P_1}{\kappa_3^2\sqrt{\alpha' n_5}}\int d^2x\sqrt{h}\,e^{2\Phi}+\frac{2P_2}{\kappa_3^2\sqrt{\alpha' n_5}}\int d^2x\sqrt{h}\,e^{4\Phi}$. Stationarity fixes $P_1=1$; the remaining coefficient $P_2=-n_1/(2n_5v_4)$ is fixed by demanding that the on-shell action reduce to thermal AdS$_3$ as $R_\phi\to\infty$. With that choice the regulated action is finite for thermal, conical-defect, cusp and black-hole ALD$_3$ geometries, reproduces the thermodynamic entropy of the black-hole solution, and yields the spacetime mass (5.31), which is identical in form to the $T\overline{T}$-deformed CFT energy (5.32) with deformation parameter $\lambda=\alpha'^2 n_5/(2 n_1 R_\phi^2)$ and undeformed energy $E_0=4M n_1 n_5/R_{\rm AdS}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, beyond the standard gravitational boundary term, the only allowed counterterms are analytic in $e^{2\Phi}$ with no derivative couplings, and that the one free coefficient is fixed by the smooth $R_\phi\to\infty$ limit to AdS$_3$; if additional finite boundary terms are allowed, the extracted energy and the $T\overline{T}$ identification change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The on-shell action computed with the boundary terms (4.45) is finite for all ALD$_3$ geometries with $8M\ge -1$, and for the black-hole case it reproduces the thermodynamic entropy.
  • The spacetime mass (5.31) agrees with the covariant-phase-space result, so Euclidean-action and canonical-charge methods give the same mass in this non-AdS setting.
  • In the $R_\phi\to\infty$ limit each ALD$_3$ on-shell action reduces to the corresponding AdS$_3$ result, showing the new boundary terms extend the standard AdS counterterms.
  • The extracted parameters $\lambda=\alpha'^2 n_5/(2n_1R_\phi^2)$ and $E_0=4Mn_1n_5/R_{\rm AdS}$ identify the ALD$_3$ mass with the double-trace $T\overline{T}$ energy, reducing to the single-trace interpretation at $n_5=1$.
  • The regulated action gives a leading-order prescription for the string sphere partition function through $Z_{\rm sphere}=e^{-S_{\rm on-shell}}$ on these NS5/F1 backgrounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spacetimes in this class without an AdS$_3$ interior would have no way to fix $P_2$ by the smooth-limit argument, so their on-shell action, and hence their proposed sphere partition function, remains ambiguous at this order.
  • The same Euclidean-action method could be applied to spinning ALD$_3$ black holes, where the covariant-phase-space approach meets integrability obstacles; a successful match would extend the $T\overline{T}$ identification to cases with angular momentum.
  • The residual single-trace versus double-trace ambiguity for $n_5>1$ (a rescaling of $\lambda$ by $n_1$) is not settled by the energy formula alone, but is testable through the finite-volume spectrum or subleading corrections of the deformed boundary theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a holographic renormalization scheme for three-dimensional asymptotically linear dilaton (ALD3) spacetimes that interpolate between AdS3 in the deep interior and a linear dilaton boundary. Starting from ten-dimensional Type II supergravity reduced on S3×T4, the authors work in the three-dimensional Einstein frame and propose boundary terms given by the Gibbons-Hawking-York term plus a boundary potential P(e^{2Φ}), with coefficients P1=1 fixed by the variational principle and P2 fixed by requiring a smooth limit to AdS3 as Rφ→∞. They compute the regulated on-shell action for the thermal, conical-defect, cusp, and black-hole solutions of Section 3, extract the spacetime energy in eq. (5.31), verify the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for the black hole, and match the energy to the TT-deformed CFT2 formula (5.32) with λ and E0 given in (5.33)–(5.34). The paper interprets the on-shell action as the leading sphere partition function and as further evidence for the role of TT deformations in the holography of ALD3 backgrounds.

Significance. The calculation is clearly and honestly presented, with several nontrivial internal checks: the on-shell action reduces to the known thermal AdS3 and BTZ results in the Rφ→∞ limit, the mass agrees with the covariant-phase-space result of [10], and the black-hole entropy matches the Bekenstein-Hawking value. If the construction is unique, the paper provides a useful extension of holographic renormalization beyond asymptotically AdS spaces and a concrete target-space method for computing sphere partition functions in linear-dilaton backgrounds. The TT identification is presented with appropriate caveats for n5>1. The main obstacles are the treatment of the Weyl transformation between string and Einstein frames and the incomplete classification of finite boundary terms; these bear directly on the claimed uniqueness of the on-shell action.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.2, footnote 3; §4.4; §5.2] The on-shell action used for the central results is evaluated for the Einstein-frame action (2.14), but the sphere-partition-function identification (1.1)–(1.2) refers to the string-frame effective action. The full-dilaton Weyl transformation (2.13) changes the action by a total derivative proportional to ∫√g ∇²Φ; footnote 3 discards this term because it does not affect the equations of motion. In the regulated ALD3 geometry this becomes a boundary integral ∫√h n^μ∂_μΦ that is linearly divergent in η_c and has a finite Rφ-dependent piece after the divergence is absorbed into the P1 counterterm. Since the counterterm ansatz (4.39) contains no normal-derivative scalar couplings, this finite piece is absent from S_on-shell. It can shift E=∂S/∂β in (5.31) and hence the extracted λ and E0 in (5.33)–(5.34). Agreement with covariant phase space [10] does not resolve the issue because [10] employs the same three-dimensional Einstein-frame action. Please compute the Weyl boundary term and show explicitly either that its finite part cancels in the regulated on-shell action or that it is β-independent and therefore does not affect the mass.
  2. [§4.4, eqs. (4.38)–(4.45)] The variational-principle argument does not eliminate normal-derivative dilaton couplings as finite boundary terms. For example, S_N = ∫∂M d²x √h C (n^μ∂_μΦ)^2 with constant C has on-shell value of order ∫d²x η²·η^{-2}, which is finite, while its leading variation under the boundary conditions (4.34)–(4.35) is O(η^{-1}) and therefore vanishes as η_c→∞. Such a term is thus compatible with δS_tot=0 and is not fixed by the smooth AdS3 limit because n^μ∂_μΦ vanishes when Φ is constant. This is a concrete instance of the missing finite-boundary-term ambiguity: the coefficient C would contribute to S_on-shell and to E in (5.31), changing the TT identification (5.33)–(5.34). The paper should either enlarge the ansatz (4.39) to include all normal- and tangential-derivative terms whose leading variation vanishes, and fix their coefficients by additional physical requirements, or justify from string theory why such terms are absent. The Weyl boundary term of Section 2.2 is precisely of this type and should be included in this analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, after eq. (5.36)] The abstract states without qualification that the spacetime energy matches the TT-deformed CFT2 energy, but for n5>1 the paper only proposes a double-trace identification and acknowledges that the precise deformation is unknown; please carry the caveat into the abstract and conclusion.
  2. [§4.4, eq. (4.42)] Please define x=e^{2Φ} explicitly before the expansion and state the dimension of the coefficients P_n; this will make the truncation to n≤2 and the role of P2 easier to follow.
  3. [§5.2, eqs. (5.16)–(5.25)] The on-shell action results are stated without the intermediate integrals; adding a few lines showing how the η_c cutoff cancels in one representative case, for example thermal ALD3, would improve reproducibility.
  4. [§5.3, eq. (5.32)] The displayed equation contains a citation artifact ('He:2025ppzwhere') that should be removed before publication.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The on-shell-action mass computation is self-contained and cross-checked, but the advertised TT-deformed energy match is a parameter fit: λ and E0 in (5.32) are chosen so that (5.31) reproduces the TT formula, making that comparison partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.3, eqs. (5.32)–(5.34)]
    "If we take the usual double trace TT deformation then the deformed energy reads [58–60] E = L/2λ (−1 + sqrt(1 + 4λE0/L)), where E0 is the undeformed energy, λ is the deformation parameter, and L is the radius of the cylinder ... Comparing with (5.31), we deduce λ = α′2n5/(2n1R2ϕ), and also E0 = 4Mn1n5/RAdS."

    Equation (5.32) is a two-parameter formula in λ and E0; eqs. (5.33)–(5.34) are obtained by equating it to the independently derived gravity result (5.31). The claimed match between the on-shell-action mass and the TT-deformed CFT energy is therefore imposed by construction rather than predicted. The subsequent 'cross-check' (5.35) merely evaluates this fitted E0 at M = -1/8 and uses the Brown-Henneaux central charge, so it does not supply independent evidence for the TT interpretation. The nontrivial residue is the specific square-root dependence on M and the definite value of λ extracted from the gravity calculation, which keeps the circularity partial rather than total.

full rationale

The bulk of the paper is a self-contained holographic-renormalization computation. The boundary counterterm ansatz in Section 4.4 is justified by the variational principle and the requirement of a smooth R_phi → infinity limit to AdS3; the single free coefficient P2 is fixed by matching the known AdS3 on-shell action, not by the TT formula. The resulting spacetime mass (5.31) is checked against covariant-phase-space results [10] and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, so the central gravity derivation has independent content. The one genuinely circular step is the TT identification in Section 5.3: the TT energy formula (5.32) has free parameters λ and E0, and eqs. (5.33)–(5.34) fix them by requiring equality with (5.31). Thus the statement that the gravity mass 'matches' the TT-deformed energy is partly a parameter fit. The square-root functional form is a real, non-circular result, and the extracted λ is a meaningful gravity prediction for the deformation parameter, so a score of 4 rather than 6 is appropriate. The self-citation of [10] for the mass formula is a consistency check, not a load-bearing circularity. The frame-dependence concern about the Weyl transformation in Section 2.2 (footnote 3) is a correctness caveat rather than a circularity, since the discarded boundary term is not being used to define the answer.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on the two-derivative Type II supergravity action, the product ansatz with no R-R flux, a restricted boundary counterterm ansatz whose coefficient P2 is fixed by the AdS limit, and the external TT-deformed energy formula. No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced. P2 is the main scheme parameter; lambda and E0 are matching parameters in the holographic interpretation.

free parameters (3)
  • P2 = -n1/(2 n5 v4)
    Boundary counterterm coefficient left unfixed by the variational principle; fixed by requiring the smooth R_phi -> infinity limit to the AdS3 on-shell action (eqs. (4.45), (5.17)). It is a scheme parameter rather than a data fit, but it directly affects the extracted energy.
  • lambda (double-trace TT deformation parameter) = alpha'^2 n5/(2 n1 R_phi^2)
    Chosen in Section 5.3 to equate the gravity mass (5.31) to the TT-deformed energy formula (5.32); this is an identification, not an independent prediction.
  • E0 (undeformed CFT energy) = 4 M n1 n5 / R_AdS
    Also chosen in Section 5.3 in the same matching; reduces to -c/(12 R_AdS) for thermal AdS3 (eq. (5.35)).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The tree-level Type II NS-NS supergravity action, dimensionally reduced on S3 x T4, evaluated on-shell gives the string sphere partition function to leading order in alpha': Z_sphere = e^{-S_on-shell} (eqs. (1.1)-(1.2)).
    Standard string perturbation logic and the target-space route to the sphere partition function for non-compact backgrounds; invoked throughout Section 1.
  • domain assumption The background ansatz (2.1): M3 x S3 x T4 with no R-R flux, H3 as in (2.1b), and dilaton depending only on the radial coordinate.
    Restricts to the NS5-F1 bound state sector; the dimensionally reduced equations (2.9) follow from this ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper The boundary counterterms are GHY plus an integral of sqrt(h) P(e^{2 Phi}) with P analytic; no normal-derivative scalar terms and no tangential-derivative terms are needed (Section 4.4, eq. (4.39)).
    Physically motivated by the absence of normal-derivative terms in the scalar bulk variation, but it is a modeling choice that leaves P2 unfixed until the AdS limit is imposed.
  • ad hoc to paper The coefficient P2 is fixed by requiring the on-shell action to reduce smoothly to the known AdS3 result as R_phi -> infinity (Section 5.2, eq. (5.17)).
    A scheme choice, not derived from the variational principle; different choices shift the action and the extracted energy.
  • domain assumption The double-trace TT-deformed CFT energy formula (5.32) describes the boundary dual for generic n5; for n5=1 the single-trace TT version applies with lambda rescaled (Section 5.3).
    External result from [58-60]; the paper notes the n5>1 identification is not yet precise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The On-shell Gravity Action and Linear Dilaton Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7LZMPFIC

@misc{pith2026250810998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The On-shell Gravity Action and Linear Dilaton Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7LZMPFIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10998}
}
abstract

Computing the Euclidean spacetime action on-shell provides a useful way of both testing holographic proposals and determining the string theory sphere partition function. We consider families of three-dimensional linear dilaton spacetimes for which there are holographic proposals that share features of a $T\overline{T}$-deformed CFT. We extend the holographic renormalization program beyond AdS to this class of geometries by identifying the boundary terms needed for a well-defined variational principle and a finite on-shell action. We show that the spacetime energy or mass determined from the on-shell action matches the $T\overline{T}$-deformed two-dimensional CFT energy. This provides more evidence for the role of the $T\overline{T}$ deformation in this holographic correspondence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    Chang, C

    C.-K. Chang, C. Ferko and S. Sethi, Holography and irrelevant operators, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 126021 [ 2302.03041]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752

    1977

  3. [2]

    Hawking and D.N

    S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space , Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983) 577

    1983

  4. [3]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, T T and LST, JHEP 07 (2017) 122 [ 1701.05576]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [4]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS 3/CFT2, JHEP 12 (2017) 155 [ 1707.05800]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Asrat, A

    M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, Holography Beyond AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 932 (2018) 241 [ 1711.02690]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Hashimoto and D

    A. Hashimoto and D. Kutasov, TT,J T,T J partition sums from string theory , JHEP 02 (2020) 080 [ 1907.07221]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    Hashimoto and D

    A. Hashimoto and D. Kutasov, Strings, symmetric products, T ¯T deformations and Hecke operators, Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135479 [ 1909.11118]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Apolo, S

    L. Apolo, S. Detournay and W. Song, TsT, T ¯T and black strings , JHEP 06 (2020) 109 [1911.12359]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Chakraborty, SL(2,R)×U(1) U(1) CFT, NS5+F1 system and single trace TT , JHEP 03 (2021) 113 [2012.03995]

    S. Chakraborty, SL(2,R)×U(1) U(1) CFT, NS5+F1 system and single trace TT , JHEP 03 (2021) 113 [2012.03995]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. Dei, B. Knighton, K. Naderi and S. Sethi, Tensionless AdS3/CFT2 and single trace TT , JHEP 11 (2024) 145 [ 2408.00823]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dei and E.J

    A. Dei and E.J. Martinec, On the string theory of a single NS5-brane , 2506.22300

  5. [13]

    Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class

    K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink, The gravitational action in asymptotically AdS and flat space-times, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 259 [ hep-th/9906127]

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cai and N

    R.-G. Cai and N. Ohta, Surface counterterms and boundary stress energy tensors for asymptotically nonAnti-de Sitter spaces , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 024006 [ hep-th/9912013]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Mann and D

    R.B. Mann and D. Marolf, Holographic renormalization of asymptotically flat spacetimes , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2927 [ hep-th/0511096]

    2006 arXiv

  9. [17]

    R.B. Mann, D. Marolf and A. Virmani, Covariant Counterterms and Conserved Charges in Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 6357 [ gr-qc/0607041]

    2006 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Astefanesei, R.B

    D. Astefanesei, R.B. Mann and C. Stelea, Note on counterterms in asymptotically flat spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 024007 [ hep-th/0608037]

    2007 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Marolf and A

    D. Marolf and A. Virmani, Holographic Renormalization of Gravity in Little String Theory Duals, JHEP 06 (2007) 042 [ hep-th/0703251]

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Le Witt and S.F

    J. Le Witt and S.F. Ross, Asymptotically Plane Wave Spacetimes and their Actions , JHEP 04 (2008) 084 [ 0801.4412]. – 24 –

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R.B. Mann, D. Marolf, R. McNees and A. Virmani, On the Stress Tensor for Asymptotically Flat Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 225019 [ 0804.2079]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kanitscheider, K

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, Precision holography for non-conformal branes, JHEP 09 (2008) 094 [ 0807.3324]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Wiseman and B

    T. Wiseman and B. Withers, Holographic renormalization for coincident Dp-branes , JHEP 10 (2008) 037 [ 0807.0755]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Mann and R

    R.B. Mann and R. McNees, Boundary Terms Unbound! Holographic Renormalization of Asymptotically Linear Dilaton Gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 065015 [ 0905.3848]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity, Annals Phys. 88 (1974) 286

    1974

  18. [26]

    Banados, C

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [ hep-th/9204099]

    1992 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes, JHEP 08 (2005) 004 [ hep-th/0505190]

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Bautista and B. M¨ uhlmann, The two-sphere partition function in two-dimensional quantum gravity , JHEP 09 (2021) 116 [ 2106.01665]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Mahajan, D

    R. Mahajan, D. Stanford and C. Yan, Sphere and disk partition functions in Liouville and in matrix integrals, JHEP 07 (2022) 132 [ 2107.01172]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Pal, Holographic Weyl anomaly in string theory , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 027 [ 2307.03000]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ahmadain and R

    A. Ahmadain and R. Khan, A Worldsheet Derivation of the Classical Off-shell Boundary Action for the Dilaton in Half-Space , 2406.00712

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413 [ hep-th/9902121]

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207

    1986

  26. [34]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The Holographic Weyl anomaly , JHEP 07 (1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Iyer and R.M

    V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4430 [gr-qc/9503052]

    1995 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Tian, On-shell action of T ¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

    J. Tian, On-shell action of T ¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Faraji Astaneh, Holographic action principle for TT ¯-deformation, Phys

    A. Faraji Astaneh, Holographic action principle for TT ¯-deformation, Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139227 [ 2407.16391]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, TT , black holes and negative strings , JHEP 09 (2020) 057 [ 2006.13249]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Chakraborty and M

    S. Chakraborty and M. Goykhman, Solvable time-like cosets and holography beyond AdS , JHEP 08 (2022) 244 [ 2204.03024]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Grumiller and R

    D. Grumiller and R. McNees, Universal flow equations and chaos bound saturation in 2d dilaton gravity, JHEP 01 (2021) 112 [ 2007.03673]. – 25 –

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Martinec and S

    E.J. Martinec and S. Massai, String Theory of Supertubes , JHEP 07 (2018) 163 [1705.10844]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ferko and S

    C. Ferko and S. Sethi, Holography with Null Boundaries , 2506.20765

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Seiberg, New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T**5 and T**5 / Z(2) , Phys

    N. Seiberg, New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T**5 and T**5 / Z(2) , Phys. Lett. B 408 (1997) 98 [ hep-th/9705221]

    1997 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Aharony, M

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Linear dilatons, NS five-branes and holography, JHEP 10 (1998) 004 [ hep-th/9808149]

    1998 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and O. Pelc, Holography for noncritical superstrings, JHEP 10 (1999) 035 [ hep-th/9907178]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Tseytlin, Extreme dyonic black holes in string theory , Mod

    A.A. Tseytlin, Extreme dyonic black holes in string theory , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11 (1996) 689 [hep-th/9601177]

    1996 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, E. Keski-Vakkuri and S.F. Ross, Supersymmetric conical defects: Towards a string theoretic description of black hole formation , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064011 [ hep-th/0011217]

    2001 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Maldacena and L

    J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Desingularization by rotation , JHEP 12 (2002) 055 [hep-th/0012025]

    2002 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Lunin, J.M

    O. Lunin, J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Gravity solutions for the D1-D5 system with angular momentum, hep-th/0212210

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kraus, Lectures on black holes and the AdS(3) / CFT(2) correspondence , Lect

    P. Kraus, Lectures on black holes and the AdS(3) / CFT(2) correspondence , Lect. Notes Phys. 755 (2008) 193 [ hep-th/0609074]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Banados, M

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the (2+1) black hole , Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1506 [ gr-qc/9302012]

    1993 arXiv

  44. [52]

    York, Jr., Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation , Phys

    J.W. York, Jr., Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 1082

    1972

  45. [53]

    Ahmadain, S

    A. Ahmadain, S. Akhtar and R. Khan, The GHY boundary term from the string worldsheet to linear order, 2411.06400

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ahmadain, V

    A. Ahmadain, V. Shyam and Z. Yan, A Comment on Deriving the Gibbons-Hawking-York Term From the String Worldsheet , 2407.18866

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Carlip and C

    S. Carlip and C. Teitelboim, Aspects of black hole quantum mechanics and thermodynamics in (2+1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 622 [ gr-qc/9405070]

    1995 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Mathematica packages for differential geometry and general relativity

    M. Headrick, “Mathematica packages for differential geometry and general relativity.” https://people.brandeis.edu/~headrick/Mathematica/

  49. [57]

    David, G

    J.R. David, G. Mandal, S. Vaidya and S.R. Wadia, Point mass geometries, spectral flow and AdS(3) - CFT(2) correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 564 (2000) 128 [ hep-th/9906112]

    2000 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory , hep-th/0401146

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory , hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Smirnov and A.B

    F.A. Smirnov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, On space of integrable quantum field theories , Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363 [ 1608.05499]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cavagli` a, S

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I.M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi and R. Tateo,T ¯T -deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112 [ 1608.05534]. – 26 –

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Jiang, A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun

    Y. Jiang, A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 057201 [ 1904.13376]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang and Y. Sun, TT deformation: Introduction and some recent advances, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68 (2025) 101001 [ 2503.09997]. – 27 –

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.