Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 118 references

A hybrid microwave-optomechanical circuit with two single-Cooper-pair transistors can be tuned to switch between slow and fast light while amplifying a weak probe field in specific frequency windows.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A hybrid microwave-optomechanical circuit is claimed to tune induced transparency and absorption, produce probe gain, and switch between slow and fast light via higher-order cross-Kerr couplings.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection The submitted file is a different paper; the abstract promises a coherent optomechanics analysis but the body is a statistics preprint, so there is nothing to referee. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.16675 v1 pith:ETJHUSUO submitted 2025-08-21 quant-ph

Optomechanically induced transparency, absorption, and conversion between slow and fast light in a generalized cross-Kerr optomechanical circuit

S. Bayati , M.H. Naderi This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords optomechanically induced transparencyoptomechanically induced absorptioncross-Kerr couplinghybrid microwave-optomechanical circuitsingle-Cooper-pair transistorslow lightfast lightprobe field amplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a concrete hybrid circuit—two single-Cooper-pair transistors coupled to a microwave LC resonator and two micromechanical resonators—and claims that, under special conditions, it behaves like a two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity with radiation-pressure and several forms of cross-Kerr coupling. The authors analyze how a strong control field and a weak probe field respond in this effective system. They show that the higher-order and three-mode cross-Kerr couplings significantly modify optomechanically induced transparency (OMIT) and absorption (OMIA), and can even produce gain that amplifies the output probe field in certain frequency windows. They also find that the same system can be switched between slow-light and fast-light responses by tuning parameters. If correct, the circuit provides a single, experimentally viable platform for tunable optical delay, amplification, and sensing.

Core claim

The central claim is that adding two single-Cooper-pair transistors to a microwave-optomechanical circuit creates an effective optomechanical cavity with two mechanical modes whose nonlinear cross-Kerr couplings—including a higher-order generalized cross-Kerr term and a three-mode cross-Kerr term, plus an induced cross-Kerr coupling between the mechanical modes—reshape the probe response. In the presence of a strong control field and a weak probe field, the authors compute the output probe spectrum and find that these nonlinear couplings alter the standard OMIT and OMIA features. Specifically, they can turn the absorption profile into gain at certain frequencies, amplifying the probe field,

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective Hamiltonian of the two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity, which contains, alongside standard radiation-pressure coupling, a cross-Kerr (CK) coupling between cavity and each mechanical mode, a higher-order generalized CK coupling, a three-mode CK coupling among cavity and both mechanical modes, and an induced CK coupling between the two mechanical modes. The authors use this Hamiltonian to derive the response of the output probe field through a standard input-output formalism; the Kerr-type nonlinear couplings are what shift the transparency/absorption windows and generate the gain regions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper treats the two-SCPT circuit as an effective two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity with radiation-pressure and cross-Kerr couplings, but it does not specify the conditions under which this mapping is valid.

What would settle it

Measure the output probe spectrum of the real circuit and check whether gain appears at the frequency regions predicted when the higher-order and three-mode cross-Kerr couplings are included; alternatively, derive the full Hamiltonian of the SCPT-coupled circuit and show that the reduced model omits or misrepresents terms, causing the gain predictions to disappear.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same hybrid circuit can be configured as a tunable optical switch between slow and fast light, which is useful for optical buffering and delay lines.
  • The predicted gain regions could make the device act as a narrow-band amplifier for the probe field at microwave-optical interfaces.
  • Because the effects are tunable via the control field and system parameters, the circuit could serve as a reconfigurable element for quantum information processing.
  • The sensitivity of the output spectrum to the nonlinear couplings offers a possible route for measuring mechanical or charge degrees of freedom in the circuit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct derivation of the effective two-mechanical-mode model from the full SCPT-circuit Hamiltonian, including the parameter regime where it is valid, would be needed before building the device; the paper asserts but does not derive this reduction.
  • The same cross-Kerr-induced gain mechanism might apply to other multimode optomechanical or electromechanical setups beyond this specific circuit, if similar higher-order couplings can be engineered.
  • A testable extension is to scan the probe frequency for the predicted gain lines while tuning the control-field power; the location of the gain regions would directly probe the strength of the three-mode cross-Kerr coupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript as submitted claims to propose and analyze a hybrid microwave-optomechanical circuit with two single-Cooper-pair transistors (SCPTs) coupled to a common LC resonator and two mechanical resonators. The abstract promises a derivation of an equivalent two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity with radiation-pressure, cross-Kerr, higher-order generalized cross-Kerr, and three-mode cross-Kerr couplings, followed by an analysis of OMIT, OMIA, gain in the absorption profile, and slow/fast light switching. However, the supplied full text is an unrelated statistics paper on differentially private randomized response designs (arXiv:2508.16709v2 [stat.ME]). It contains no equations, derivations, parameter regimes, numerical results, or any other content related to the optomechanical system described in the abstract. The claimed physics results are entirely unsupported within the submitted artifact.

Significance. If the claimed results were properly derived and verified, the proposed circuit could be a meaningful contribution to tunable OMIT/OMIA and slow/fast light control in hybrid optomechanical systems, with potential applications in quantum sensing and information processing. The abstract identifies specific nonlinear couplings (higher-order and three-mode cross-Kerr) as having a notable impact on the output probe field, which would be a testable and potentially novel prediction. However, because the submitted manuscript contains none of the technical content necessary to assess the claim, the significance cannot be evaluated. The only verifiable statement is that the abstract describes a plausible research direction; the actual contribution is absent from the artifact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text] The full text supplied is a completely different paper: 'Optimal Differentially Private Randomized Response Designs to Collect Sensitive Binary Data' by Karmakar and Ghosh (arXiv:2508.16709v2 [stat.ME]). It contains no mention of optomechanics, SCPTs, OMIT, OMIA, cross-Kerr couplings, or slow/fast light. The central claim of the abstract—that the hybrid circuit can be equivalently modeled as a two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity—is never stated, let alone derived. No equations, no parameter regimes, and no results for the claimed system appear anywhere in the submitted artifact. This is not a local omission; the entire technical substance of the paper is missing.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's second sentence asserts that 'under special conditions such a system can be equivalently modeled as a two-mechanical-modes optomechanical cavity' with radiation-pressure, cross-Kerr, higher-order, and three-mode couplings. This is a load-bearing premise: all subsequent predictions (OMIT/OMIA, gain, slow/fast light) are computed within that reduced model. The submitted artifact provides no derivation of this mapping, no statement of the 'special conditions' (e.g., parameter ranges, validity of the reduction, omitted dissipative terms), and no justification that the SCPT nonlinearities are faithfully represented. Without this derivation, the central claim is unsupported by the submitted manuscript.
  3. [Full Text (all)] The manuscript contains no data, simulation results, or numerical analysis for the optomechanical circuit. The abstract promises an analysis of the output probe field and reports qualitative findings (gain in the absorption profile, amplification in specific frequency regions, tunable switching between slow and fast light). None of these statements is backed by any equation, figure, or table in the supplied text. The artifact is internally inconsistent: the abstract describes one paper while the body is an entirely different paper. This inconsistency prevents any assessment of soundness.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Full Text] The arXiv identifier in the full text (2508.16709v2) differs from the claimed quant-ph identifier (2508.16675). The journal should verify the submitted file, but this mismatch does not affect the referee's substantive conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity is present or assessable: the supplied full text is unrelated to the claimed quant-ph abstract, so no derivation chain exists to reduce.

full rationale

The claimed optomechanical derivation is absent from the supplied manuscript body, which is instead a stat.ME paper on differentially private randomized response designs. The abstract's assertion that 'under special conditions such a system can be equivalently modeled as a two-mechanical-modes optomechanical cavity' is never derived, and none of the promised OMIT/OMIA, gain, or slow/fast-light response equations appear. This is a severe omission and internal inconsistency, but it is not a circularity: there is no chain of equations or fitted parameters that reduces a prediction to its input by construction, no self-citation chain, and no renamed empirical result. A circularity score of 0 is therefore the honest finding; the manuscript's failure is one of missing support and topic mismatch, not of self-referential derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

With only the abstract available for the optomechanics claims, no numerical parameters, explicit derivations, or novel entities can be audited. The proposed results rest on an asserted effective-model reduction ('under special conditions') that the supplied text does not derive, and on standard input-output and circuit-QED background assumptions.

free parameters (1)
  • Effective coupling strengths (radiation-pressure g, cross-Kerr K, three-mode CK coupling) = not stated in the supplied text
    The OMIT/OMIA, gain, and slow/fast-light results depend on the relative sizes of these couplings, but the supplied text (abstract only) gives no values or operating-point constraints.
axioms (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The full six-element circuit is reducible, 'under special conditions', to a two-mechanical-mode optomechanical cavity with radiation-pressure, cross-Kerr, generalized cross-Kerr, and three-mode cross-Kerr couplings.
    Central modeling step asserted in the abstract's second sentence; no derivation or validity conditions are supplied in the available text.
  • domain assumption Standard input-output theory for a cavity driven by a strong control field and a weak probe field gives the output probe response, with OMIT and OMIA read from the usual susceptibility formulas.
    The abstract's analysis implicitly relies on standard cavity optomechanics input-output formalism, including linearization and slowly varying envelope approximations, which are not stated.
  • domain assumption Each single-Cooper-pair transistor provides a tunable Josephson nonlinearity, and the combination yields the various cross-Kerr couplings.
    The abstract invokes SCPTs as the source of the nonlinear couplings but provides no circuit parameters or bias points.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optomechanically induced transparency, absorption, and conversion between slow and fast light in a generalized cross-Kerr optomechanical circuit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ETJHUSUO

@misc{pith2026250816675,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optomechanically induced transparency, absorption, and conversion between slow and fast light in a generalized cross-Kerr optomechanical circuit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ETJHUSUO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16675}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In this paper, we propose and explore an experimentally viable scheme to realize tunable optomechanically induced transparency (OMIT) and optomechanically induced absorption (OMIA) phenomena in a hybrid microwave-optomechanical circuit in which two single-Cooper-pair transistors (SCPTs) are coupled to a common microwave $LC$ resonator and two independent micromechanical resonators. We show that under special conditions such a system can be equivalently modeled as a two-mechanical-modes optomechanical cavity in which, besides the standard radiation-pressure coupling, the cavity mode interacts with the mechanical modes through the cross-Kerr (CK), a higher-order generalized CK, and a three-mode CK type of coupling. Furthermore, there is an induced CK coupling between the two-mechanical modes. Assuming that the cavity mode is simultaneously driven by a strong control field and a weak probe field, we analyze the response of the output probe field affected by the above-mentioned nonlinear couplings. In particular, our results reveal that the higher-order nonlinear CK and the three-mode CK couplings have remarkable impact on the characteristics of the OMIT and OMIA phenomena. Moreover, we find that these nonlinear couplings can give rise to the occurrence of the gain in the absorption profile and contribute to the amplification of the output probe field in specific frequency regions. We also show that the system offers tunable switching between slow and fast light behaviors. The proposed hybrid optomechanical circuit may find potential applications in light propagation, quantum sensing of physical quantities, and information processing.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Boller, A

    K.-J. Boller, A. Imamo g lu, and S. E. Harris, Observation of electromagnetically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2593 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2593 (1991)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2593 1991

  2. [2]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.633 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.633 2005

  3. [3]

    Lukin and A

    M. Lukin and A. Imamo g lu, Controlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1038/35095018 Nature 413, 273--276 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1038/35095018 2001

  4. [4]

    G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Electromagnetically induced transparency in mechanical effects of light, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.041803 Phys. Rev. A 81, 041803 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.81.041803 2010

  5. [6]

    Taichenachev, A

    A. Taichenachev, A. Tumaikin, and V. Yudin, Electromagnetically induced absorption in a four-state system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.011802 Phys. Rev. A 61, 011802 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.61.011802 1999

  6. [7]

    Arimondo, Coherent population trapping in laser spectroscopy, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6638(08)60020-1 Prog

    E. Arimondo, Coherent population trapping in laser spectroscopy, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6638(08)60020-1 Prog. Opt. 35, 259 (1996)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)60020-1 1996

  7. [8]

    L. V. Hau, S. E. Harris, Z. Dutton, and C. H. Behroozi, Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas, https://doi.org/10.1038/17561 Nature 397, 594 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1038/17561 1999

  8. [9]

    C. Liu, Z. Dutton, C. H. Behroozi, and L. V. Hau, Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses, https://doi.org/10.1038/35054017 Nature 409, 490 (2001)

    doi:10.1038/35054017 2001

  9. [10]

    Z.-X. Liu, B. Wang, C. Kong, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, Magnetic-field-dependent slow light in strontium atom-cavity system, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024217 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 111109 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5024217 2018

  10. [11]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07127 Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    doi:10.1038/nature07127 2008

  11. [12]

    A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.231 Nat. Photonics 3, 706 (2009)

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.231 2009

  12. [13]

    Chanelière, D

    T. Chanelière, D. N. Matsukevich, S. D. Jenkins, S.-Y. Lan, T. A. B. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, Storage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04315 Nature 438, 833 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04315 2005

  13. [14]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1003 (1998)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.1003 1998

  14. [15]

    B. S. Ham and P. Hemmer, Coherence switching in a four-level system: Quantum switching, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4080 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4080 (2000)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4080 2000

  15. [16]

    Hennrich, T

    M. Hennrich, T. Legero, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe, Vacuum-stimulated Raman scattering based on adiabatic passage in a high-finesse optical cavity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4872 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4872 (2000)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4872 2000

  16. [17]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Côté, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037901 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.037901 2001

  17. [18]

    M. C. Phillips, H. Wang, I. Rumyantsev, N. H. Kwong, R. Takayama, and R. Binder, Electromagnetically induced transparency in semiconductors via biexciton coherence, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.183602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 183602 (2003)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.183602 2003

  18. [19]

    X. Xu, B. Sun, P. R. Berman, D. G. Steel, A. S. Bracker, D. Gammon, and L. J. Sham, Coherent population trapping of an electron spin in a single negatively charged quantum dot, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1054 Nat. Phys. 4, 692 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1054 2008

  19. [20]

    Zhang, D

    S. Zhang, D. A. Genov, Y. Wang, M. Liu, and X. Zhang, Plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.047401 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047401 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.047401 2008

  20. [21]

    S. Y. Chiam, R. Singh, C. Rockstuhl, F. Lederer, W. Zhang, and A. A. Bettiol, Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency in a terahertz metamaterial, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.153103 Phys. Rev. B 80, 153103 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.153103 2009

  21. [22]

    Santori, P

    C. Santori, P. Tamarat, P. Neumann, J. Wrachtrup, D. Fattal, R. G. Beausoleil, J. Rabeau, P. Olivero, A. D. Greentree, S. Prawer, F. Jelezko, and P. Hemmer, Coherent population trapping of single spins in diamond under optical excitation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.247401 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 247401 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.247401 2006

  22. [23]

    A. A. Abdumalikov, O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, Y. A. Pashkin, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Electromagnetically induced transparency on a single artificial atom, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.193601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 193601 (2010)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.193601 2010

  23. [24]

    Albert, A

    M. Albert, A. Dantan, and M. Drewsen, Cavity electromagnetically induced transparency and all-optical switching using ion Coulomb crystals, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.156 Nat. Photonics 5, 633 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.156 2011

  24. [25]

    Ullah, M

    K. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and O. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, Tunable multiwindow magnomechanically induced transparency, Fano resonances, and slow-to-fast light conversion, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033721 Phys. Rev. A 102, 033721 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.033721 2020

  25. [26]

    Bayati, M

    S. Bayati, M. Bagheri Harouni, and A. Mahdifar, Magnomechanically induced transparency and tunable slow-fast light via a levitated micromagnet, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.515093 Opt. Express 32, 14914--14928 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.515093 2024

  26. [27]

    X. Wang, F. Wang, H. Guan, and W. Yang, Phase control of magnomechanically induced transparency in a closed-loop three-cavity array, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.452178 Opt. Express 33, 19991 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.452178 2025

  27. [28]

    Y. Jiao, H. Lü, J. Qian, Y. Li, and H. Jing, Nonlinear optomechanics with gain and loss: amplifying higher-order sideband and group delay, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083034 New J. Phys. 18, 083034 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083034 2016

  28. [29]

    X. Zhou, F. Hocke, A. Schliesser, A. Marx, H. Huebl, R. Gross, and T. J. Kippenberg, Slowing, advancing and switching of microwave signals using circuit nanoelectromechanics, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2545 Nat. Phys. 9, 179 (2013)

    doi:10.1038/nphys2545 2013

  29. [30]

    Pokharel, H

    A. Pokharel, H. Xu, S. Venkatachalam, E. Collin, and X. Zhou, Coupling capacitively distinct mechanical resonators for room-temperature phonon-cavity electromechanics, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02529 Nano Lett. 22, 7351 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02529 2022

  30. [31]

    S. Weis, R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195596 Science 330, 1520--1523 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1195596 2010

  31. [32]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini, T. P. M. Alegre, J. Chan, M. Eichenfield, M. Winger, Q. Lin, J. T. Hill, D. Chang, and O. Painter, Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09913 Nature 472, 69 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09913 2011

  32. [33]

    Xiong and Y

    H. Xiong and Y. Wu, Fundamentals and applications of optomechanically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5033389 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031305 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5033389 2018

  33. [34]

    Lezama, S

    A. Lezama, S. Barreiro, and A. M. Akulshin, Electromagnetically induced absorption, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4732 Phys. Rev. A 59, 4732 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.59.4732 1999

  34. [35]

    Qu and G

    K. Qu and G. S. Agarwal, Phonon-mediated electromagnetically induced absorption in hybrid opto-electromechanical systems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.031802 Phys. Rev. A 87, 031802(R) (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.031802 2013

  35. [36]

    Hocke, X

    F. Hocke, X. Zhou, A. Schliesser, T. J. Kippenberg, H. Huebl, and R. Gross, Electromechanically induced absorption in a circuit nano-electromechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123037 New J. Phys. 14, 123037 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123037 2012

  36. [37]

    J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, and R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09898 Nature 471, 204 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09898 2011

  37. [38]

    Karuza, C

    M. Karuza, C. Biancofiore, M. Bawaj, C. Molinelli, M. Galassi, R. Natali, P. Tombesi, G. Di Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Optomechanically induced transparency in a membrane-in-the-middle setup at room temperature, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.013804 Phys. Rev. A 88, 013804 (2013)

    doi:10.1103/physreva.88.013804 2013

  38. [39]

    C. Dong, J. Zhang, V. Fiore, and H. Wang, Optomechanically induced transparency and self-induced oscillations with Bogoliubov mechanical modes, https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.1.000425 Optica 1, 425 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.1.000425 2014

  39. [40]

    D. P. Lake, M. Mitchell, D. D. Sukachev, and P. E. Barclay, Optomechanically induced transparency and cooling in thermally stable diamond microcavities, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01112 ACS Photonics 5, 782 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01112 2018

  40. [41]

    Shen, C.-H

    Z. Shen, C.-H. Dong, Y. Chen, Y.-F. Xiao, F.-W. Sun, and G.-C. Guo, Compensation of the Kerr effect for transient optomechanically induced transparency in a silica microsphere, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.001249 Opt. Lett. 41, 1249 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.41.001249 2016

  41. [42]

    W. He, J. J. Li, and K. D. Zhu, Coupling-rate determination based on radiation-pressure-induced normal mode splitting in cavity optomechanical systems, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000339 Opt. Lett. 35, 339 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.35.000339 2010

  42. [43]

    Z.-X. Liu, B. Wang, C. Kong, L.-G. Si, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, A proposed method to measure weak magnetic field based on a hybrid optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12473-2 Sci. Rep. 7, 12521 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12473-2 2017

  43. [44]

    Zhang, Y

    J.-Q. Zhang, Y. Li, M. Feng, and Y. Xu, Precision measurement of electrical charge with optomechanically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.053806 Phys. Rev. A 86, 053806 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.053806 2012

  44. [45]

    Tarhan, S

    D. Tarhan, S. Huang, and . E. M\"ustecapl o g lu, Superluminal and ultraslow light propagation in optomechanical systems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.013824 Phys. Rev. A 87, 013824 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.013824 2013

  45. [46]

    Akram, M

    M. Akram, M. Khan, and F. Saif, Tunable fast and slow light in a hybrid optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023846 Phys. Rev. A 92, 023846 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.023846 2015

  46. [47]

    Fiore, Y

    V. Fiore, Y. Yang, M. C. Kuzyk, R. Barbour, L. Tian, and H. Wang, Storing optical information as a mechanical excitation in a silica optomechanical resonator, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.133601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133601 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.133601 2011

  47. [48]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, Optomechanical transducers for quantum information processing, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042341 Phys. Rev. A 84, 042341 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.042341 2011

  48. [49]

    S. A. McGee, D. Meiser, C. A. Regal, K. W. Lehnert, and M. J. Holland, Mechanical resonators for storage and transfer of electrical and optical quantum states, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.053818 Phys. Rev. A 87, 053818 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.053818 2013

  49. [50]

    B. P. Hou, L. F. Wei, and S. J. Wang, Optomechanically induced transparency and absorption in hybridized optomechanical systems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.033829 Phys. Rev. A 92, 033829 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.033829 2015

  50. [51]

    H. Wang, X. Gu, Y.-x. Liu, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Optomechanical analog of two-color electromagnetically induced transparency: Photon transmission through an optomechanical device with a two-level system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.023817 Phys. Rev. A 90, 023817 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.023817 2014

  51. [52]

    H. Hao, M. C. Kuzyk, J. Ren, F. Zhang, X. Duan, L. Zhou, T. Zhang, Q. Gong, H. Wang, and Y. Gu, Electromagnetically and optomechanically induced transparency and amplification in an atom-assisted cavity optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.023820 Phys. Rev. A 100, 023820 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.023820 2019

  52. [53]

    Y. Xiao, Y. F. Yu, and Z. M. Zhang, Controllable optomechanically induced transparency and ponderomotive squeezing in an optomechanical system assisted by an atomic ensemble, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.017979 Opt. Express 22, 17979 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.017979 2014

  53. [54]

    T. Wang, M. H. Zheng, C. H. Bai, D. Y. Wang, A. D. Zhu, H. F. Wang, and S. Zhang, Normal-mode splitting and optomechanically induced absorption, amplification, and transparency in a hybrid optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201800228 Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 530, 1800228 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201800228 2018

  54. [55]

    Xiong, Y

    H. Xiong, Y. M. Huang, L. L. Wan, and Y. Wu, Vector cavity optomechanics in the parameter configuration of optomechanically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.013816 Phys. Rev. A 94, 013816 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.013816 2016

  55. [56]

    H. Lü, Y. Jiang, Y. Z. Wang, and H. Jing, Optomechanically induced transparency in a spinning resonator, https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.5.000367 Photonics Res. 5, 367 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.5.000367 2017

  56. [57]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Li, and Y. Zhang, Nonreciprocal optomechanically induced transparency and enhanced ground-state cooling in a reversed-dissipation cavity system, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.32.000499 Opt. Express 32, 499 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.32.000499 2024

  57. [58]

    D. Wang, B. Yin, J. Wang, M. Y. Peng, H. Z. Lin, T. X. Lu, and H. Jing, Squeezing-induced nonreciprocal transparency and the slow-to-fast-light switch, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.053514 Phys. Rev. A 111, 053514 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.053514 2025

  58. [59]

    H. Jing, S. K. Özdemir, Z. Geng, J. Zhang, X. Y. Lü, B. Peng, L. Yang, and F. Nori, Optomechanically-induced transparency in parity-time-symmetric microresonators, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09663 Sci. Rep. 5, 9663 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1038/srep09663 2015

  59. [60]

    H. Lü, C. Wang, L. Yang, and H. Jing, Optomechanically induced transparency at exceptional points, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.014006 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 014006 (2018)

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.014006 2018

  60. [61]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Saif, Y. Jiao, and H. Jing, Loss-induced transparency in optomechanics, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.025199 Opt. Express 26, 25199 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.26.025199 2018

  61. [62]

    P. C. Ma, J. Q. Zhang, Y. Xiao, M. Feng, and Z. M. Zhang, Tunable double optomechanically induced transparency in an optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.043825 Phys. Rev. A 90, 043825 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043825 2014

  62. [63]

    Shahidani, M

    S. Shahidani, M. Naderi, and M. Soltanolkotabi, Control and manipulation of electromagnetically induced transparency in a nonlinear optomechanical system with two movable mirrors, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053813 Phys. Rev. A 88, 053813 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.053813 2013

  63. [64]

    X. Y. Zhang, Y. H. Zhou, Y. Q. Guo, and X. X. Yi, Optomechanically induced transparency in optomechanics with both linear and quadratic coupling, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.053802 Phys. Rev. A 98, 053802 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.053802 2018

  64. [65]

    F.-C. Lei, M. Gao, C. Du, Q.-L. Jing, and G.-L. Long, Three-pathway electromagnetically induced transparency in coupled-cavity optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.011508 Opt. Express 23, 11508 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.23.011508 2015

  65. [66]

    Sohail, Y

    A. Sohail, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, and C. S. Yu, Optomechanically induced transparency in multi-cavity optomechanical system with and without one two-level atom, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28830 Sci. Rep. 6, 28830 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1038/srep28830 2016

  66. [67]

    Huang and G

    S. Huang and G. S. Agarwal, Electromagnetically induced transparency from two-phonon processes in quadratically coupled membranes, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.023823 Phys. Rev. A 83, 023823 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.023823 2011

  67. [68]

    C. Bai, B. P. Hou, D. G. Lai, and D. Wu, Tunable optomechanically induced transparency in double quadratically coupled optomechanical cavities within a common reservoir, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.043804 Phys. Rev. A 93, 043804 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.043804 2016

  68. [69]

    M. A. Lemonde, N. Didier, and A. A. Clerk, Nonlinear interaction effects in a strongly driven optomechanical cavity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.053602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053602 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.053602 2013

  69. [70]

    Børkje, A

    K. Børkje, A. Nunnenkamp, J. D. Teufel, and S. M. Girvin, Signatures of nonlinear cavity optomechanics in the weak coupling regime, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.053603 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053603 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.053603 2013

  70. [71]

    Kronwald and F

    A. Kronwald and F. Marquardt, Optomechanically induced transparency in the nonlinear quantum regime, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.133601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 133601 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.133601 2013

  71. [72]

    Xiong, L.-G

    H. Xiong, L.-G. Si, A.-S. Zheng, X. Yang, and Y. Wu, Higher-order sidebands in optomechanically induced transparency, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.013815 Phys. Rev. A 86, 013815 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013815 2012

  72. [73]

    Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, Yu.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Effective Hamiltonian approach to the Kerr nonlinearity in an optomechanical system, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.065801 Phys. Rev. A 80, 065801 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.80.065801 2009

  73. [74]

    Aldana, C

    S. Aldana, C. Bruder, and A. Nunnenkamp, On the equivalence between an optomechanical system and a Kerr medium, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.043826 Phys. Rev. A 88, 043826 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.043826 2013

  74. [75]

    Verhagen, S

    E. Verhagen, S. Deléglise, S. Weis, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical oscillator to an optical cavity mode, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10981 Nature 482, 63 (2012)

    doi:10.1038/nature10981 2012

  75. [76]

    Huang and G

    S. Huang and G. S. Agarwal, Normal-mode splitting in a coupled system of a nanomechanical oscillator and a parametric amplifier cavity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.033807 Phys. Rev. A 80, 033807 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.80.033807 2009

  76. [77]

    Huang and G

    S. Huang and G. S. Agarwal, Enhancement of cavity cooling of a micromechanical mirror using parametric interactions, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.013821 Phys. Rev. A 79, 013821 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.79.013821 2009

  77. [78]

    Shahidani, M

    S. Shahidani, M. H. Naderi, M. Soltanolkotabi, and S. Barzanjeh, Steady-state entanglement, cooling, and tristability in a nonlinear optomechanical cavity, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.001087 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 1087 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.31.001087 2014

  78. [79]

    Huang and A

    S. Huang and A. Chen, Improving the cooling of a mechanical oscillator in a dissipative optomechanical system with an optical parametric amplifier, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.063818 Phys. Rev. A 98, 063818 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.063818 2018

  79. [80]

    J. T. Sun, H. D. Liu, and X. X. Yi, Quantum synchronization and quantum synchronization in a coupled optomechanical system with Kerr nonlinearity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.023502 Phys. Rev. A 109, 023502 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.023502 2024

  80. [81]

    Wang, C.-H

    D.-Y. Wang, C.-H. Bai, X. Han, et al., Enhanced photon blockade in an optomechanical system with parametric amplification, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.45.002604 Opt. Lett. 45, 2604 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.45.002604 2020

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.