Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Hydrodynamic instabilities in driven chiral suspensions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chiral spinning particles self-propel their way to collective chaos

desk verdict A novel and coherent instability result for torque-monopole chiral suspensions, with an unproven zero-stresslet assumption that a serious referee should push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17879 v1 pith:UYZAU7DX submitted 2025-08-25 cond-mat.soft

Seema Chahal , Brato Chakrabarti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords chiralactivemattertorquemonopoleself-propulsionhydrodynamicinstabilitykinetictheorynemato-polarcouplingsuspensionspatternformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a dilute three-dimensional suspension of chiral particles spun by an external torque, each acting on the fluid as a torque monopole and propelling itself along its axis, is generically unstable to a finite-wavenumber hydrodynamic instability. The aligned polar state and the isotropic state both lose stability, and in both cases the instability requires self-propulsion: setting the chirality-induced propulsion speed $\chi$ to zero stabilises the suspension. The authors trace the mechanism to the coupling between nematic ordering, which flow perturbations induce through Jeffery's equation, and polar order, which exists only because self-propelled particles advect their own concentration. If this picture is right, torque-driven chiral suspensions offer a route to spontaneous flow, concentration bands, and three-dimensional spatio-temporally chaotic states that is distinct from the dipolar alignment instability of ordinary active suspensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the antisymmetric polar stress $\Sigma^a_{ij} = \frac{\tau}{2}\,\epsilon_{ijk} n_k c$, the rotlet stress exerted by torque-monopole particles, combined with the chirality-imposed relation $V_s \sim \chi$ linking self-propulsion to the actuating torque. Flow perturbations orient particles nematically through Jeffery's equation; the polar stress can then amplify velocity fluctuations only if nematic order generates polar order through the advective term $\chi\nabla\cdot(c Q)$ in the polarity equation. Because the nemato-polar coupling is proportional to $\chi$ and to the gradient operator, it vanishes at zero propulsion and at zero wavenumber, which selects finite-wavenumber modes and makes self-propulsion the indispensable ingredient.

What would settle it

Perform a bulk experiment or simulation with torque-driven achiral spheroids (Quincke rotation) at $\chi=0$: if concentration or orientation perturbations grow and self-sustaining collective motion appears, the claim that the instability is unique to self-propelled chiral particles fails. Alternatively, measure the force-dipole stresslet of a single spinning chiral particle; if it is comparable to the torque-monopole stress, the polar-stress mechanism is not the only player.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central claim: in a momentum-conserving Stokesian suspension, torque-monopole (rotlet) particles alone are stable, but when microscopic chirality endows them with self-propulsion along their spin axis, the homogeneous aligned and isotropic states are destabilised at finite wavenumber, producing emergent polar order, bands, and chaotically evolving three-dimensional flows. The eigenvalue analysis yields a Hopf bifurcation for the aligned state and a wavenumber-selected instability for the isotropic state, with growth occurring at intermediate wavenumbers while long-wavelength modes remain stable. The instability disappears when the propulsion speed vanishes ($\chi=0$), so achiral spinning particles never exhibit it; the paper also notes that perturbations exactly parallel or transverse to the flock remain stable. Nonlinear pseudospectral simulations of the moment equations confirm the linear predictions and show sustained banded density fluctuations and vorticity patches reminiscent of low-Reynolds-number active turbulence.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the entire particle stress is the antisymmetric torque-monopole stress, with no symmetric force-dipole contribution from the self-propelling chiral particles, and it treats the aligned state as a delta function in orientation, so the instability could be altered if propulsion brings a significant stresslet or if orientation fluctuations are strong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Torque-driven chiral suspensions should exhibit spontaneous pattern formation even in the dilute limit, with no need for the dipolar stresses that drive conventional active turbulence.
  • The instability is wavenumber-selected, so finite system size or translational diffusion selects a preferred pattern scale rather than scale-free growth.
  • The aligned polar state is unstable for perturbations oblique to the flock but stable for exactly parallel and transverse perturbations, predicting anisotropic fluctuation spectra.
  • Since the mechanism requires only $\chi\neq 0$, any actuation scheme that couples torque to propulsion (helical micromotors, Quincke helices) should display the dynamics.
  • The moment-closure framework gives a base for computing effective rheology, including odd-viscosity signatures, of bulk chiral fluids.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the stress ansatz holds, the same instability should appear in experiments on helical Quincke particles in bulk; the predicted wavenumber selection could be tested by measuring the dominant wavelength of concentration bands as diffusion is varied.
  • The finite-wavenumber selection suggests a plausible link to odd viscosity: the antisymmetric stress is an odd (Hall-like) response, and the instability may be the nonlinear route that generates the parity-breaking macroscopic transport the authors propose to study.
  • In confined or quasi-two-dimensional geometries, the instability may be suppressed because the $k\to 0$ modes are the only ones available, which could explain why earlier chiral active matter studies in thin layers observed different dynamics.
  • Adapting the moment closure to include rotational diffusion would yield a concrete test: at strong $d_r$ the Hopf growth rates should shrink, and if they vanish, the instability's observable threshold depends measurably on orientational noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a dilute suspension of torque-driven chiral spheroids in a Stokesian fluid. Each particle spins about its long axis under an external torque and acquires a self-propulsion speed proportional to that torque because of microscopic chirality. The suspension is described by a mean-field kinetic equation, and the mean-field flow is computed from a Stokes equation with an antisymmetric torque-monopole particle stress. A linear stability analysis of both a uniaxially aligned polar state and the isotropic state predicts a finite-wavenumber, Hopf-type instability that is absent when the dimensionless self-propulsion parameter χ is zero. The same moment equations, closed at third order and integrated numerically in a triply periodic box, yield concentration bands, emergent polarity, and spatiotemporally chaotic three-dimensional flows. The paper interprets this as a new, non-dipolar route to collective dynamics in active Stokesian suspensions.

Significance. If the torque-monopole-only stress model is accepted, the paper identifies a genuinely new mechanism: a finite-wavenumber instability driven by nemato-polar coupling, with an explicit contrast to the long-wavelength dipolar alignment instability. The manuscript deserves credit for a coherent linear-theory framework, a physically meaningful χ=0 control, consistency with the earlier result of Das and Saintillan [42] for achiral spinning particles, and nonlinear simulations that go beyond the linear instability. The wavenumber-selection argument is clearly articulated, and the predicted instability is falsifiable in the sense that it has a characteristic wavenumber and disappears without self-propulsion. The significance is nonetheless conditional on the microscopic stress ansatz, on which the central physical distinction rests.

major comments (2)
  1. [Modeling, Eqs. (5)-(6)] The entire instability mechanism is built on the ansatz that the particle stress is exclusively the antisymmetric torque-monopole stress Σ^a_ij=(τ/2) ε_ijk n_k c, with the symmetric stresslet set to zero. The paper asserts that the particles 'do not produce dipolar stresses' and cites Batchelor [37], but Batchelor's force-free-particle stress formula includes symmetric stresslets; a chiral object that both spins and self-propels along its axis is force-free but not generically stresslet-free. If a symmetric active stress term ∇·(α c Q_ij) is present in Eq. (5), the familiar long-wavelength dipolar alignment instability occurs even at χ=0, which would remove the paper's central discriminator and its contrast with dipolar active matter. The authors should derive or explicitly estimate the stresslet for the modeled torque-driven chiral particles and show that it does not alter the stability boundaries, or they should restrict the claims to a regime in which the stresslet is provably negligible.
  2. [Linear Stability Analysis, Eqs. (7)-(9)] The aligned-state eigenvalue problem (Eq. (9)) is derived from the delta-distribution closure Ψ=c δ(p−n) and is solved with dT=dr=0, while the nonlinear simulations use dT=dr=0.01. Because the central claim is that the aligned state is destabilized whenever self-propulsion is present and is 'always stable' for χ=0, the role of finite rotational diffusion in regularizing the delta state should be addressed. The simulations suggest that the instability may persist at finite dr, but the paper should either provide the finite-dr stability calculation or state explicitly the parameter range in which the linear-theory predictions apply, so that the reader can compare the linear boundary with the simulation parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (12) and surrounding text] The isotropic-state dispersion relation is deferred to the SI; the branch of the logarithm and the parameter ranges for which Re σ>0 are not specified in the main text. A short derivation or at least a branch specification would make the result checkable.
  2. [Eq. (9)] Eq. (9) is described as an eigenvalue problem, but the entries of the 3×3 matrix and the numerical procedure used to obtain λ(k,θ) are not given; in particular, it would be useful to state explicitly how χ enters the system and to display the determinant that yields the growth rates.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption refers to a drawing 'on the left' that is not reproduced in the text as submitted; the caption should be self-contained regarding all panels shown.
  4. [Features of the instability] The phrase 'the predicted instability is absent if Vs ∼ χ=0' should be rewritten as 'if χ=0 (equivalently Vs=0)' to avoid implying a proportionality relation rather than a condition.
  5. [Modeling, paragraph after Eq. (4)] The paper acknowledges that generalized-Jeffery corrections and chirality-induced center-of-mass drift are neglected; since these effects are known to appear for chiral shapes, the concluding paragraph should state explicitly that the results apply to homo-chiral spheroids in the limit of negligible drift, rather than to arbitrary chiral particles.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the instability results follow from explicit linearization of a stated model, with χ=0 as a parameter limit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The kinetic model (Eqs. 1–6), the torque-monopole stress closure following Batchelor [37], and the moment equations (13–15) are clearly stated inputs; the stability results for the aligned state (Eq. 9) and the isotropic state (Eq. 12) are obtained by explicit linearization and Fourier analysis. The claim that the instability is absent when Vs∼χ=0 is a direct parameter limit of the derived eigenvalue problems, not a fitted quantity or a renamed outcome. The self-propulsion parameter χ is a dimensionless model input encoding the chiral translation–rotation coupling; it is not inferred from the target instability. The paper contains no self-citations by the authors (Chahal and Chakrabarti do not appear in the reference list); external references [41] and [42] are used only to support the interpretation of the derived nemato-polar coupling and the stability of achiral spinning particles, respectively, and are not load-bearing for the algebra. The torque-monopole-only stress ansatz (Eq. 6), with symmetric stresslets neglected, is a physical modeling assumption whose validity is a correctness risk (as the accompanying skeptic note observes), but it does not reduce the target claim to itself by construction. The finite-wavenumber selection, the Hopf character, and the χ-dependence are nontrivial outputs of the equations. The paper also explicitly acknowledges ignored higher-order chiral corrections and weak center-of-mass drift, which are limitations of completeness rather than circularity. No step in the derivation chain quotes its conclusion as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a standard kinetic-theory scaffold plus one concrete physical postulate: torque-driven chiral particles exert only an antisymmetric polar stress. The single input controlling the claimed mechanism is χ, which is prescribed rather than fitted. No new physical entities are introduced; the torque monopole and chiral screw particle are pre-existing concepts.

free parameters (3)
  • χ (dimensionless chirality-induced self-propulsion speed) = χ=1 in the linear-stability results (Figs. 1-2); χ=0.5 in the nonlinear simulation (Fig. 3)
    Sets the strength of self-propulsion relative to the torque-generated flow; the claimed instability requires χ≠0 and the analysis is performed at prescribed values.
  • γ (shape parameter in Jeffery's equation) = γ=1 (elongated rods)
    Chosen rather than derived; the letter states 'we have assumed γ=1', which simplifies the orientation dynamics.
  • d_T, d_r (translational and rotational diffusivities) = d_T=d_r=0 in the linear analysis; d_T=d_r=0.01 in the nonlinear simulations
    Set to zero to expose the inviscid instability and to small values in simulations to regularize and cut off high wavenumbers.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Smoluchowski equation (Eq. 1) with translational flux Vs p + u - d_T ∇lnΨ and Jeffery orientational flux (Eq. 4) is a valid mean-field description of the dilute suspension.
    Standard kinetic theory for spheroidal active suspensions, cited to [2]; requires diluteness and neglects pair interactions.
  • domain assumption The mean field obeys the forced incompressible Stokes equation (Eq. 5) with particle stress Σ^a=(τ/2) ε·(c n) (Eq. 6) and no other stress contributions.
    The torque-monopole/rotlet stress from [37] is the load-bearing stress ansatz of the paper; any additional dipolar stress would change the mechanism.
  • ad hoc to paper Jeffery's equation with γ=1 and no generalized-Jeffery corrections is sufficient for chiral spheroids, and the paper ignores center-of-mass drift induced by chirality.
    Stated in the Modeling section; the authors acknowledge corrections from [34-36] and set them aside for simplicity.
  • ad hoc to paper In the aligned-state linearization, the distribution is represented as Ψ=c δ(p−n) and rotational diffusion is ignored; in the isotropic analysis d_r=0.
    Used to obtain Eqs. (7)-(9); finite rotational diffusion could introduce additional orientation fluctuations and modify growth rates.
  • ad hoc to paper In the nonlinear simulations, higher-order moments R and S are closed using the procedure of [44,45].
    The truncation is not validated against the full kinetic equation or a convergence study in the letter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hydrodynamic instabilities in driven chiral suspensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UYZAU7DX

@misc{pith2026250817879,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hydrodynamic instabilities in driven chiral suspensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UYZAU7DX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17879}
}
read the original abstract

Active Stokesian suspensions are conventionally understood to generate dipolar stresses that destabilize aligned states in the bulk and drive system-wide spatiotemporally chaotic flows. Here, we report dynamics in suspensions of torque-driven spinning chiral particles that exhibit a distinct and previously unrecognized route to collective dynamics. Using a mean-field kinetic theory, stability analysis, and nonlinear simulations, we demonstrate how flows driven by torque monopoles and self-propulsion resulting from microscopic chirality drive chaotic flows in three dimensions. Unlike the well-known alignment instability of dipolar active matter, the present dynamics is intrinsically tied to self-propulsion and relies on the emergent coupling between nematic and polar order. Our results establish a novel route to pattern formation, suggest strategies for designing torque-driven active suspensions, and provide a mechanistic framework to probe the rheology of chiral fluids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.17879 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dispersion relation for the isotropic state depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Snapshots from a statistically steady state of a 3D direct numerical simulation of the moment equations in a triply [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Das and D

    D. Das and D. Saintillan, On the absence of collective motion in a bulk suspension of spontaneously rotating dielectric particles, Soft Matter 19, 6825 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [37]

    Batchelor, The stress system in a suspension of force- free particles, Journal of fluid mechanics 41, 545 (1970)

    G. Batchelor, The stress system in a suspension of force- free particles, Journal of fluid mechanics 41, 545 (1970)

    work page 1970

  3. [1]

    Aditi Simha and S

    R. Aditi Simha and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamic fluc- tuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self- propelled particles, Physical review letters 89, 058101 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [2]

    Saintillan and M

    D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Instabilities and pattern formation in active particle suspensions: Kinetic theory and continuum simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 178103 (2008)

    2008

  5. [3]

    Subramanian and D

    G. Subramanian and D. L. Koch, Critical bacterial con- centration for the onset of collective swimming, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 632, 359 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [4]

    Baskaran and M

    A. Baskaran and M. C. Marchetti, Statistical mechanics and hydrodynamics of bacterial suspensions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 15567 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [5]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  8. [6]

    Alert, J.-F

    R. Alert, J.-F. Joanny, and J. Casademunt, Universal scaling of active nematic turbulence, Nature Physics 16, 682 (2020)

    2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [7]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  2. [8]

    Saintillan and M

    D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Theory of active sus- pensions, in Complex fluids in biological systems: Ex- periment, theory, and computation (Springer, 2014) pp. 319–355

    2014

  3. [9]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbu- lence, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 143 (2022)

    2022

  4. [10]

    X. M. de Wit, M. Fruchart, T. Khain, F. Toschi, and V. Vitelli, Pattern formation by turbulent cascades, Na- ture 627, 515 (2024)

    2024

  5. [11]

    Ghosh and P

    A. Ghosh and P. Fischer, Controlled propulsion of artifi- cial magnetic nanostructured propellers, Nano letters 9, 2243 (2009)

    2009

  6. [12]

    Goyal, J

    R. Goyal, J. Behera, P. Mandal, and A. Ghosh, Exter- nally controlled intermittent randomization enables com- plex navigation of multiple nanobots, Nature Communi- cations 16, 2700 (2025)

    2025

  7. [13]

    Banerjee, A

    D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, A. G. Abanov, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Nature communica- tions 8, 1573 (2017)

    2017

  8. [14]

    Maitra, Activity unmasks chirality in liquid- crystalline matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 16 (2025)

    A. Maitra, Activity unmasks chirality in liquid- crystalline matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 16 (2025)

    2025

  9. [15]

    Darnton, L

    N. Darnton, L. Turner, K. Breuer, and H. C. Berg, Mov- ing fluid with bacterial carpets, Biophysical journal 86, 1863 (2004)

    2004

  10. [16]

    D. J. Smith, J. R. Blake, and E. A. Gaffney, Fluid me- chanics of nodal flow due to embryonic primary cilia, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5, 567 (2008)

    2008

  11. [17]

    F¨ urthauer, M

    S. F¨ urthauer, M. Strempel, S. W. Grill, and F. J¨ ulicher, Active chiral processes in thin films, Physical review let- ters 110, 048103 (2013)

    2013

  12. [18]

    S. R. Naganathan, S. F¨ urthauer, M. Nishikawa, F. J¨ ulicher, and S. W. Grill, Active torque generation by the actomyosin cell cortex drives left–right symmetry breaking, elife 3, e04165 (2014)

    2014

  13. [19]

    Meißner, L

    L. Meißner, L. Niese, and S. Diez, Helical motion and torque generation by microtubule motors, Current opin- ion in cell biology 88, 102367 (2024)

    2024

  14. [20]

    Lauga, The fluid dynamics of cell motility , Vol

    E. Lauga, The fluid dynamics of cell motility , Vol. 62 (Cambridge University Press, 2020). 6

    2020

  15. [21]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nature physics15, 1188 (2019)

    2019

  16. [22]

    Maitra, M

    A. Maitra, M. Lenz, and R. Voituriez, Chiral active hex- atics: Giant number fluctuations, waves, and destruction of order, Physical Review Letters 125, 238005 (2020)

    2020

  17. [23]

    S. Kole, G. P. Alexander, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Maitra, Layered chiral active matter: Beyond odd elasticity, Physical Review Letters 126, 248001 (2021)

    2021

  18. [24]

    Maitra and M

    A. Maitra and M. Lenz, Spontaneous rotation can sta- bilise ordered chiral active fluids, Nature communications 10, 920 (2019)

    2019

  19. [25]

    Patra, K

    P. Patra, K. Beyer, A. Jaiswal, A. Battista, K. Rohr, F. Frischknecht, and U. S. Schwarz, Collective migration reveals mechanical flexibility of malaria parasites, Nature Physics 18, 586 (2022)

    2022

  20. [26]

    Digregorio, I

    P. Digregorio, I. Pagonabarraga, and F. V. Reyes, Phase separation in a chiral active fluid of inertial self-spinning disks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08533 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Kuroda, T

    Y. Kuroda, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Singular den- sity correlations in chiral active fluids in three dimen- sions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08770 (2025)

    2025

  22. [28]

    Banerjee and R

    D. Banerjee and R. Alert, Active screws: Emergent ac- tive chiral nematics of spinning self-propelled rods, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12263 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  23. [29]

    P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamics of drops and vesicles, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 51, 305 (2019)

    2019

  24. [30]

    Brosseau, G

    Q. Brosseau, G. Hickey, and P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohy- drodynamic quincke rotation of a prolate ellipsoid, Phys- ical Review Fluids 2, 014101 (2017)

    2017

  25. [31]

    Lefranc, A

    T. Lefranc, A. Dinelli, C. Fern´ andez-Rico, R. Dullens, J. Tailleur, and D. Bartolo, Quorum sensing and absorb- ing phase transitions in colloidal active matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13919 (2025)

    2025

  26. [32]

    Das and E

    D. Das and E. Lauga, Active particles powered by quincke rotation in a bulk fluid, Physical review letters 122, 194503 (2019)

    2019

  27. [33]

    G. B. Jeffery, The motion of ellipsoidal particles im- mersed in a viscous fluid, Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathe- matical and Physical Character 102, 161 (1922)

    1922

  28. [34]

    Dalwadi, C

    M. Dalwadi, C. Moreau, E. Gaffney, K. Ishimoto, and B. Walker, Generalised jeffery’s equations for rapidly spinning particles. part 1. spheroids, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics 979, A1 (2024)

    2024

  29. [35]

    Dalwadi, C

    M. Dalwadi, C. Moreau, E. Gaffney, B. Walker, and K. Ishimoto, Generalised jeffery’s equations for rapidly spinning particles. part 2. helicoidal objects with chiral- ity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 979, A2 (2024)

    2024

  30. [36]

    Marcos, H. C. Fu, T. R. Powers, and R. Stocker, Separa- tion of microscale chiral objects by shear flow, Physical review letters 102, 158103 (2009)

    2009

  31. [38]

    I. Lavi, R. Alert, J.-F. Joanny, and J. Casademunt, Non- linear spontaneous flow instability in active nematics, Physical Review Letters 134, 238301 (2025)

    2025

  32. [39]

    I. Lavi, R. Alert, J.-F. Joanny, and J. Casademunt, Dynamical arrest in active nematic turbulence, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15149 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    H. H. Wensink, J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, H. L¨ owen, and J. M. Yeomans, Meso- scale turbulence in living fluids, Proceedings of the na- tional academy of sciences 109, 14308 (2012)

    2012

  34. [41]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, When are active brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles equivalent? con- sequences for motility-induced phase separation, Euro- physics Letters 101, 20010 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    K. J. Burns, G. M. Vasil, J. S. Oishi, D. Lecoanet, and B. P. Brown, Dedalus: A flexible framework for numer- ical simulations with spectral methods, Physical Review Research 2, 023068 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Theillard and D

    M. Theillard and D. Saintillan, Computational mean- field modeling of confined active fluids, Journal of Com- putational Physics 397, 108841 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Weady, D

    S. Weady, D. B. Stein, and M. J. Shelley, Thermody- namically consistent coarse-graining of polar active flu- ids, Physical Review Fluids 7, 063301 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Sanchez, D

    T. Sanchez, D. T. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Spontaneous motion in hierarchically as- sembled active matter, Nature 491, 431 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Chatterjee, N

    R. Chatterjee, N. Rana, R. A. Simha, P. Perlekar, and S. Ramaswamy, Inertia drives a flocking phase transition in viscous active fluids, Physical Review X 11, 031063 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Ohm and M

    L. Ohm and M. J. Shelley, Weakly nonlinear analysis of pattern formation in active suspensions, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 942, A53 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Vafa and A

    F. Vafa and A. Doostmohammadi, Phase diagram, con- fining strings, and a new universality class in nematopo- lar matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04769 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    P. Chen, S. Weady, S. Atis, T. Matsuzawa, M. J. Shel- ley, and W. T. Irvine, Self-propulsion, flocking and chi- ral active phases from particles spinning at intermediate reynolds numbers, Nature Physics 21, 146 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    S. Chen, D. E. Fan, P. Fischer, A. Ghosh, K. G¨ opfrich, R. Golestanian, H. Hess, X. Ma, B. J. Nelson, T. Pati˜ no Padial,et al., A roadmap for next-generation nanomotors, Nature Nanotechnology , 1 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    C.-T. Lee, T. Lubensky, and T. Markovich, Odd elasticity in disordered chiral active materials (2025), arXiv:2508.04468

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.