Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 33 references

Polarization- and time-resolved nonlinear multi-photon spectroscopy for confocal microscopy of semiconductor nanostructures

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports a confocal nonlinear microscope that preserves light polarization through near-normal-incidence optics, enabling quantitative SHG rotational anisotropy, full polarization tomography, and two-color pump-probe spectroscopy o

desk verdict A competent, honest instrumentation paper: the integrated confocal SHG/pump-probe platform is genuinely useful, and the demonstrations support the core claim, though the broadband polarization-fidelity claim is wider than the validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18026 v1 pith:QOJZ22ZR submitted 2025-08-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nikita V. Siverin , Andreas Farenbruch , Dmitri R. Yakovlev , Daniel J. Gillard , Xuerong Hu , Alexander I. Tartakovskii , Manfred Bayer This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 42.65.Ky78.47.-p07.60.Pb
keywords secondharmonicgenerationpolarizationtomographyconfocalmicroscopynonlinearspectroscopysemiconductornanostructurestwo-colorpump-probetwisted2Dmaterialscoherentphonons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a confocal microscope that makes polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation (SHG) and multi-photon spectroscopy practical on micrometer-sized semiconductor samples across a broad spectral range. The central advance is an optical design that preserves the linear polarization state through near-normal-incidence reflection on wedged beam splitters, so measured SHG rotational anisotropies and full polarization tomography maps reflect the sample's symmetry rather than artifacts of the optics. The setup combines tunable femtosecond and picosecond pulses (0.5–4 eV), a cryostat (4–300 K), an in-plane magnetic field up to 0.625 T, and two-color pump-probe detection. Demonstration experiments on ZnSe, Cu2O, twisted MoS2 flakes, and Cs2AgBiBr6 show that symmetry, crystal orientation, twist angles, and coherent phonon dynamics can all be extracted from the same instrument. If the claims hold, this provides a single platform for resonant, symmetry-resolved nonlinear spectroscopy of bulk crystals and 2D heterostructures under external control.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the near-normal-incidence wedged beam splitter (reflection angle ≈8°), which reflects the excitation beam into the microscope objective with minimal s/p polarization distortion, preventing the incident light from becoming elliptical and the analyzed signal from being scrambled. Around this, the instrument couples synchronized fs- and ps-OPAs, motorized half-wave plates and Glan-Thompson polarizers for full polarization control in excitation and detection, a 20× NA 0.40 objective, a helium-flow cryostat, an electromagnet, a spectrometer with 60 µeV resolution, and an auto-balanced photodiode with lock-in detection for pump-probe experiments.

What would settle it

Take a reference sample with known SHG rotational anisotropy, such as the ZnSe 1S exciton, and record full polarization tomography at fundamental energies corresponding to SHG at 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 eV. If the measured lobe positions, node depths, or sixfold/fourfold symmetries deviate from the known reference in a wavelength-dependent way, the polarization-preservation assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that a single confocal, back-reflection nonlinear microscope can deliver polarization-faithful SHG spectroscopy and microscopy without the polarization distortions that usually corrupt such measurements. Using wedged beam splitters at ~8° instead of dichroic mirrors, the excitation and signal polarization states are preserved, enabling quantitative rotational-anisotropy scans and full two-dimensional polarization tomography over a second-harmonic energy range of about 0.8 to 7.8 eV. The instrument is validated by close agreement with reference ZnSe 1S exciton rotational anisotropy data, and demonstrated in four regimes: exciton tomography in Cu2O with magnetic-field

Load-bearing premise

The setup's polarization fidelity relies on the near-normal-incidence wedged beam splitters preserving linear polarization; this was verified only at one wavelength (the ZnSe 1S exciton), so if wavelength-dependent polarization distortion exists across the 0.5–4 eV range, the polarization tomography maps for other energies or materials could be systematically biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantitative rotational anisotropy and full polarization tomography can now be performed on micron-scale flakes, not just bulk crystals, under resonant exciton excitation.
  • The same optical path supports SHG spectral scans, SHG microscopy, and time-resolved pump-probe, so symmetry and dynamics can be correlated on one sample location.
  • Twisted van der Waals heterostructures can be mapped for crystal orientation and twist angle with sub-degree precision.
  • Magnetic-field-induced SHG contributions in Voigt geometry become measurable at fields below 1 T, allowing symmetry-breaking studies.
  • The setup can be extended to THG, FHG, SFG, DFG, and four-wave mixing with no fundamental redesign.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The polarization-tomography method could be applied to classify exciton symmetry in less-studied materials, using the group-theoretical analysis the paper validates on Cu2O.
  • The temperature-dependent LA kink and TA softening in Cs2AgBiBr6 could serve as a general optical thermometer for structural phase transitions in halide perovskites.
  • If extended with quarter-wave plates, the same polarization-preserving geometry should enable circular-polarization-resolved SHG and valley-selective measurements in 2D materials.
  • The near-normal-incidence reflection trick could also improve other polarization-sensitive microscopies, such as Raman or photoluminescence anisotropy mapping, where elliptic distortion is a known nuisance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a home-built confocal nonlinear microscope that combines polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation (SHG) and multi-photon spectroscopy with broadband laser tuning (0.5–4.0 eV), a helium-flow cryostat (4–300 K), an in-plane electromagnet (up to 0.625 T), and a two-color pump-probe channel. The central claim is that the instrument delivers polarization-preserving SHG and polarization tomography over a wide spectral range, with micrometer-scale spatial mapping and time-resolved coherent-phonon detection. Validation is performed on bulk ZnSe, bulk Cu2O, twisted MoS2 flakes, and Cs2AgBiBr6, comparing the results with previous data, group-theory calculations, and known crystal-symmetry behavior. The paper is framed as an instrumentation paper rather than a new-physics report.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a useful technical contribution: a single setup combining polarization tomography, spatial mapping, magnetic-field capability, and time-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy would be valuable for resonant nonlinear optics on bulk and low-dimensional semiconductors. The paper has several strengths: the 45°-reflection control experiment in Fig. 3 clearly demonstrates the importance of minimizing s/p polarization distortion; the Cu2O tomography agrees with a group-theory calculation; the MoS2 maps provide a multi-region demonstration of crystal-orientation and twist-angle sensitivity; and the pump-probe phonon data are physically reasonable. However, the broadband polarization-preservation claim is not fully supported by the measurements: the only direct polarization-fidelity benchmark is a single-wavelength ZnSe check, and the beam splitter is specified only over 400–1800 nm, not the claimed 0.5–4.0 eV range. The paper is publishable after the calibration gap and several overstatements are addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [II D / III A] The central claim of polarization-preserving SHG over 0.5–4.0 eV is not yet established. The wedged beam splitters are specified for 400–1800 nm only, while the setup is claimed to operate from ~310 nm to ~2.5 µm (0.5–4.0 eV). The only polarization-fidelity validation is the ZnSe 1S exciton rotational-anisotropy measurement at a single SHG energy (~2.8 eV), and that comparison is made against the authors' own Ref. [27]. No wavelength-resolved calibration of the polarization response is reported. Since s/p distortion can vary with wavelength and coating/dispersion, this leaves the load-bearing broadband claim unverified. I request a wavelength-resolved polarimetric characterization (e.g., rotating analyzer or Mueller-matrix measurements) across the OPA tuning range, or an explicit restriction of the polarization-fidelity claim to the validated spectral window.
  2. [II C / Conclusions] The instrument is repeatedly described as 'confocal' and as providing 'diffraction-limited spatial scanning' (Conclusions, item iv), but I find no confocal pinhole in the detection path described in Section II C and Fig. 2. The back-reflection geometry alone does not provide confocal axial sectioning; the spectrometer slit is not equivalent to a confocal pinhole. No axial point-spread-function or resolution-target measurement is reported. Please demonstrate the confocal/axial-resolving behavior or replace 'confocal'/'diffraction-limited' with more accurate terminology such as 'epi-illumination microscopy with micrometer-scale focusing.'
  3. [III D] The text states that crystal axes are determined 'with sub-degree precision' from the sixfold SHG patterns in MoS2. No fitting model, parameter uncertainties, or residuals are provided. This is a quantitative performance claim that cannot be assessed from the current presentation. Please give the fitting function, the standard errors of the extracted angles (ideally with repeated measurements), or soften the precision claim accordingly.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract / II A] 'Full polarization control' should be qualified as full control of linear polarization. Circularly or elliptically polarized excitation is not currently implemented; indeed, the Conclusions list circular polarization as a future extension.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The 'reference data' in Fig. 3(a) are from the authors' own Ref. [27]. This should be stated explicitly in the caption or text so that readers know the benchmark is not fully independent.
  3. [Section III A] The group-theory calculation in Fig. 4(b) is only cited to Refs. [13,29]. A brief outline of the model and the parameters used (e.g., chosen tensor components, resonance conditions) would make the comparison more self-contained.
  4. [Section III B] The line cuts in Fig. 5 are described as 'at fixed SHG analyzer angle,' but the angle is not specified in the caption or text. Please state the value.
  5. [Section III C] The spectral scan has a gap around 2.4 eV because of signal/idler filter overlap. This is acceptable, but the statement that the range 'in principle can be extended to 0.8–7.8 eV' should be clearly marked as an extrapolation, not a demonstrated capability.
  6. [Section III D] The sixfold SHG fits used for twist-angle extraction are not described. Even if the precision claim is relaxed, reporting the fit function and residuals would improve reproducibility.
  7. [Introduction / Conclusions] The Introduction states the setup is for THG, FHG, SFG, DFG, and FWM, but no such measurements are shown. Consider clarifying that these are planned capabilities rather than demonstrated ones (the Conclusions already do this for THG/FHG).
  8. [Data Availability] The data availability statement says data and software are available 'upon reasonable request.' For an instrument paper, depositing calibration data and control software in a public repository would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: setup validation rests on independent measurements and external benchmarks; self-citations are references, not load-bearing derivations.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental instrument description, not a derivation chain. The claimed capabilities—polarization-controlled confocal SHG, broadband tunability, cryogenic and magnetic-field operation, and two-color pump-probe—are each supported by direct measurements on known materials. The ZnSe rotational anisotropy is compared with Ref. [27], a prior paper by overlapping authors, but that is a calibration-style comparison against a well-documented sixfold symmetry pattern, and Fig. 3(c) provides an internal control showing that a 45-degree reflection visibly distorts the pattern. Thus the polarization-preservation claim is not reduced to the prior paper by construction. The Cu2O theory is cited from Refs. [13,29], but the measured tomography map is new experimental data, and the group-theoretical calculation is an independent symmetry analysis, not a parameter fitted from the present data. The MoS2 maps and Cs2AgBiBr6 pump-probe transients are compared with established sixfold SHG expectations, stacking-symmetry arguments, and known phonon frequencies (~9 and ~19 GHz), all external to the setup's fitted parameters. The skeptical concern about polarization fidelity being validated at only a single wavelength while the beam splitter is specified only over 400–1800 nm is a legitimate correctness or extrapolation risk, but it is not circularity: no claimed result is equivalent by definition to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an instrument description; its central claim rests on assumptions about sample orientation, reference symmetry patterns, and the polarization-preserving property of the optics, none of which are free parameters fitted to data. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The group-theoretical symmetry analysis from Refs [13,29] correctly describes SHG polarization patterns in Cu2O.
    Used to generate the theoretical tomography map in Fig. 4(b) for comparison with the measured Cu2O data.
  • domain assumption The 1S exciton resonance in ZnSe lies at approximately 2.80 eV, matching the observed SHG maximum.
    The SHG peak at 2.80 eV in Fig. 6 is assigned to the 1S exciton without an independent spectroscopic calibration in this work.
  • domain assumption The samples and crystal orientations (ZnSe [111], Cu2O [111] and [1-10]) are as stated, and the assignments of the observed symmetries are correct.
    The demonstration claims depend on the sample orientations and known symmetry patterns.
  • domain assumption The near-normal incidence wedged beam splitters introduce negligible polarization distortion across the full 0.5-4.0 eV range.
    Polarization fidelity is demonstrated at one wavelength (ZnSe 1S exciton) and asserted generally throughout the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarization- and time-resolved nonlinear multi-photon spectroscopy for confocal microscopy of semiconductor nanostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOJZ22ZR

@misc{pith2026250818026,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarization- and time-resolved nonlinear multi-photon spectroscopy for confocal microscopy of semiconductor nanostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOJZ22ZR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18026}
}
abstract

We present a versatile confocal microscopy setup for optical second harmonic generation (SHG) and multi-photon spectroscopy that enables polarization-resolved studies of semiconductor bulk crystals and low-dimensional structures. The system offers full polarization control in both excitation and detection, spatial scanning with micrometer resolution, and spectrally tunable excitation over a broad energy range from 0.5 to 4.0 eV, using femtosecond and picosecond laser pulses. Samples are mounted in a helium-flow cryostat, allowing temperature control from 4 to 300 K. Magnetic fields up to 0.625 T can be applied in the Voigt geometry via an electromagnet. The nonlinear optical signals are analyzed using a high-resolution spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 60 $\mu$eV. We demonstrate the potential of the setup by means of SHG polarization tomography measurements on a Cu$_2$O crystal as well as through a SHG spectral scan of a ZnSe crystal over a wide energy range from 1.4 to 3.1 eV. Polarization-resolved confocal SHG mapping of various twisted mono- and bilayer MoS$_2$ structures is also presented. In addition, time-resolved two-color pump-probe experiments are shown for a Cs$_2$AgBiBr$_6$ crystal, illustrating the potential of the system for investigating coherent exciton and phonon dynamics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    J. Mund, D. R. Yakovlev, M. A. Semina, and M. Bayer, Optical harmonic generation on the exciton-polariton in ZnSe, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Y. R. Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics , (Wiley, New York, 1984)

    work page 1984

  3. [2]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics , (Academic/Elsevier, Burlington, 2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [3]

    Fiebig, V

    M. Fiebig, V. V. Pavlov, and R. V. Pisarev, Second- harmonic generation as a tool for studying electronic and magnetic structures of crystals (review),J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 96–118 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [4]

    D. R. Yakovlev, V. V. Pavlov, A. V. Rodina, R. V. Pis- arev, J. Mund, W. Warkentin, and M. Bayer, Exciton spectroscopy of semiconductors by the method of opti- cal harmonics generation (review), Phys. Solid State 60, 1471 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    Kirilyuk and T

    A. Kirilyuk and T. Rasing, Magnetization-induced- second-harmonic generation from surfaces and interfaces, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 148 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [6]

    K. J. Spychala, P. Mackwitz, M. R¨ using, A. Widhalm, G. Berth, C. Silberhorn, and A. Zrenner, Nonlinear focal mapping of ferroelectric domain walls in LiTaO3: Analy- sis of the SHG microscopy contrast mechanism, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 234102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    Nordlander, G

    J. Nordlander, G. De Luca, N. Strkalj, M. Fiebig, and M. Trassin, Probing ferroic states in oxide thin films using optical second harmonic generation, Appl. Sci. 8, 570 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Aghigh, S

    A. Aghigh, S. Bancelin, M. Rivard, M. Pinsard, H. Ibrahim, and F. L´ egar´ e, Second harmonic generation microscopy: a powerful tool for bio-imaging, Biophys. Rev. 15, 43–70 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    D. S. James and P. J. Campagnola, Recent advancements in optical harmonic generation microscopy: applications and perspectives, BME Frontiers 2021, 3973857 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    J. Mund, D. Fr¨ ohlich, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, High-resolution second-harmonic generation spec- troscopy with femtosecond laser pulses on excitons in Cu2O, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085203 (2018)

    2018

  4. [11]

    Mund, Ch

    J. Mund, Ch. Uihlein, D. Fr¨ ohlich, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Second-harmonic generation on the yellow 1S exciton in Cu 2O in symmetry-forbidden geometries, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195204 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    J. Mund, A. Farenbruch, D. R. Yakovlev, A. A. Maksi- mov, A. Waag, and M. Bayer, Optical second- and third- harmonic generation on excitons in ZnSe/BeTe quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125433 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Farenbruch, J

    A. Farenbruch, J. Mund, D. Fr¨ ohlich, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, M. A. Semina, and M. M. Glazov, Magneto-Stark and Zeeman effect as origin of second harmonic gener- ation of excitons in Cu 2O, Phys. Rev. B 101, 115201 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Brunne, M

    D. Brunne, M. Lafrentz, V. V. Pavlov, R. V. Pisarev, A. V. Rodina, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Electric field effect on optical harmonic generation at the exciton resonances in GaAs, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085202 (2015)

    2015

  8. [15]

    Lafrentz, D

    M. Lafrentz, D. Brunne, A. V. Rodina, V. V. Pavlov, R. V. Pisarev, D. R. Yakovlev, A. Bakin, and M. Bayer, Second-harmonic generation spectroscopy of excitons in 12 ZnO, Phys. Rev. B 88, 235207 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    Warkentin, J

    W. Warkentin, J. Mund, D. R. Yakovlev, V. V. Pavlov, R. V. Pisarev, A. V. Rodina, M. A. Semina, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, and M. Bayer, Third harmonic generation on exciton-polaritons in bulk semiconductors subject to a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075204 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    Wang and X

    Y. Wang and X. Zhang, Second harmonic genera- tion spectroscopy on two-dimensional materials [Invited], Opt. Mater. Express 9, 1136–1149 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    G. M. Maragkakis, S. Psilodimitrakopoulos, L. Mouch- liadis, I. Paradisanos, A. Lemonis, G. Kioseoglou, and E. Stratakis, Imaging the crystal orientation of 2D tran- sition metal dichalcogenides using polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation, Opto-Electronic Advances 2...

    2019

  12. [19]

    Psilodimitrakopoulos, S

    S. Psilodimitrakopoulos, S. Ilin, L. E. Zelenkov, S. Makarov, and E. Stratakis, Tailoring polarization- resolved SHG in two-dimensional semiconductors, Nanophotonics 13, 1525–1549 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    X. Zhou, J. Cheng, Y. Zhou, T. Cao, H. Hong, Z. Liao, S. Wu, H. Peng, K. Liu, and D. Yu, Strong second- harmonic generation in atomic layered GaSe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7994–7997 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Zeng, G.-B

    H. Zeng, G.-B. Liu, J. Dai, Y. Yan, B. Zhu, R. He, L. Xie, S. Xu, X. Chen, W. Yao, and X. Cui, Optical signature of symmetry variations and spin–valley coupling in atom- ically thin tungsten dichalcogenides, Sci. Rep. 3, 1608 (2013)

    2013

  15. [22]

    Gusachenko, G

    I. Gusachenko, G. Latour, and M.-C. Schanne-Klein, Polarization-resolved second-harmonic microscopy in anisotropic thick tissues, Opt. Express 18, 19339–19352 (2010)

    2010

  16. [23]

    Suceava, S

    A. Suceava, S. Hazra, J. Nag, J. Hayden, S. Imam, Z. Liu, A. Iyer, M. G. Kanatzidis, S. Trolier-McKinstry, J.-P. Maria, and V. Gopalan, Quantitative nonlinear op- tical polarimetry with high spatial resolution, Optica 12, 1153–1166 (2025)

    2025

  17. [24]

    E. I. Romijn, A. Finnøy, R. Kumar, and M. B. Lilledahl, Automated calibration and control for polarization- resolved second harmonic generation on commercial mi- croscopes, PLOS ONE 13, e0195027 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    Chou, W.-L

    C.-K. Chou, W.-L. Chen, P. T. Fwu, S.-J. Lin, H.-S. Lee, and C.-Y. Dong, Polarization ellipticity compensation in polarization second-harmonic generation microscopy without specimen rotation, J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 014005 (2008)

    2008

  19. [26]

    Kumar, K

    R. Kumar, K. M. Grønhaug, E. I. Romijn, A. Finnøy, C. L. Davies, J. O. Drogset, and M. B. Lilledahl, Polar- ization second harmonic generation microscopy provides quantitative enhanced molecular specificity for tissue di- agnostics, J. Biophotonics 8, 730–739 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Farenbruch, D

    A. Farenbruch, D. Fr¨ ohlich, H. Stolz, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Second-harmonic generation of blue se- ries excitons and magnetoexcitons in Cu 2O, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075203 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Farenbruch, D

    A. Farenbruch, D. Fr¨ ohlich, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Rydberg series of dark excitons in Cu2O, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 207402 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Farenbruch, N

    A. Farenbruch, N. V. Siverin, G. Uca, D. Fr¨ ohlich, D. R. Yakovlev, and M. Bayer, Coherence of dipole- forbidden Rydberg excitons in Cu 2O measured by polarization- and time-resolved multi-photon spec- troscopy, arXiv:2507.22717 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Second Harmonic Generation from Artificially Stacked Transi- tion Metal Dichalcogenide Twisted Bilayers,

    W.-T. Hsu, Z.-A. Zhao, L.-J. Li, C.-H. Chen, M.-H. Chiu, P.-S. Chang, Y.-C. Chou, and W.-H. Chang, “Second Harmonic Generation from Artificially Stacked Transi- tion Metal Dichalcogenide Twisted Bilayers,” ACS Nano 8(3), 2951–2958 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Second harmonic generation control in twisted bilayers of transition metal dichalco- genides,

    I. Paradisanos, A. M. Saiz Raven, T. Amand, C. Robert, P. Renucci, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. C. Gerber, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, “Second harmonic generation control in twisted bilayers of transition metal dichalco- genides,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 115420 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Horiachyi, M

    D. Horiachyi, M. O. Nestoklon, I. A. Akimov, A. V. Tri- fonov, N. V. Siverin, N. E. Kopteva, A. N. Kosarev, D. R. Yakovlev, V. E. Gusev, M. Fries, O. Trukhina, V. Dyakonov, and M. Bayer, Efficient launch of shear phonons via anisotropic photostriction in halide per- ovskites, ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.