Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Three-dimensional trapping of circular Rydberg atoms by a superimposed vortex light beam

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Superposing four Bessel vortex beams with opposite charges and directions gives circular Rydberg atoms a 3D ponderomotive trap with one atom per lattice site.

desk verdict Good analytic work on a CRA ponderomotive lattice, but the benchmark frequencies are far above the ionization threshold and the absolute trap depth is never quantified, so the trapping claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20362 v1 pith:VCP4JQ5G submitted 2025-08-28 physics.atom-ph hep-ph

Yi Liao , Hao-Lin Wang , Pengcheng Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phhep-ph
keywords circularRydbergatomsponderomotivepotentialBesselvortexbeamsopticaltrappinglatticeorbitalangularmomentumthree-dimensionalconfinementcorrectedorbitapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a superposition of four equal-intensity Bessel vortex beams—two with topological charge +m and two with -m, propagating in opposite directions along the beam axis—creates a ponderomotive potential that traps circular Rydberg atoms in all three dimensions. The authors derive the potential analytically for the free electron, then convolve it with the hydrogenic wavefunction of the valence electron to get the atomic potential. They also construct a corrected classical circular-orbit approximation that reproduces the exact result far better than the standard circular-orbit picture. If the scheme works as calculated, a single long-lived circular Rydberg atom would sit at each lattice site along the beam axis, giving arrays of these atoms a new trapping platform.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the superimposed Bessel vortex field $\bar{\mathbf A}_{\kappa,\bar m,\bar k_z,\Lambda}$, built from four fields with $(m,k_z)$, $(m,-k_z)$, $(-m,k_z)$, and $(-m,-k_z)$. Its time-averaged square factorizes into an azimuthal/radial shape $F_m(\kappa r,\phi_r)$ times $\cos^2(k_z z)$, giving a periodic potential in both $\phi$ and $z$. The argument is carried by the corrected classical circular orbit (ccco) approximation, which treats the CRA electron as moving in a circular orbit with small nutation around $\theta=\pi/2$; retaining the $\cos\theta$ correction in the longitudinal phase $\xi_\parallel(\tau\cos\theta+\zeta)$ fixes the failure of the naive circular-orbit average and matches the exact convolution.

What would settle it

Measure or compute the ionization and state-mixing rate of an $n=52$ circular Rydberg atom in an $\omega=15$ eV field at the intensities the trap requires; if that lifetime is shorter than the expected oscillation period, the calculated potential is not the physical trap. Separately, propagate the superposed field through a realistic finite aperture and check whether the central lattice wells and their one-atom-per-site structure persist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the time-averaged ponderomotive energy of an electron in the composed field, $V_e(r,\phi_r,z)=\frac{1}{4}V_e^0\,F_m(\kappa r,\phi_r)\cos^2(k_z z)$, where $F_m$ is a combination of Bessel functions $J_m$, $J_{m\pm 1}$ determined by the topological charge $m$ and the opening angle $\alpha$. Convolving this with the circular Rydberg state of principal quantum number $n$ gives the atomic potential $V_{\rm CRA}(P,\Phi,Z)$, which the authors evaluate numerically for benchmark parameters ($n=52$, $\omega=15$ eV, $\alpha=20^\circ$, $|m|=5$) and find local minima at the beam center that repeat along the axis with period $\pi/k_z$. The transverse well width (about 113.5 nm) exceeds the longitudinal width (about 22 nm), which the authors argue suits the CRA's thin annular electron distribution. They also establish the scaling $n_1^2\kappa_1\approx n_2^2\kappa_2$: to trap a higher principal-quantum-number CRA, one lowers the transverse momentum $\kappa$ (lower frequency or smaller opening angle), making the method increasingly favorable for higher $n$.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the 15 eV trapping light is a weak perturbation that neither ionizes nor appreciably reshapes the circular Rydberg state, and that an ideal infinite Bessel beam can be replaced by a real finite beam without changing the trapping picture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One circular Rydberg atom can be confined at each longitudinal minimum of the potential, so the beam axis becomes a one-dimensional lattice of single-atom traps.
  • The trap's depth and its transverse and longitudinal widths can be tuned through the topological charge $m$, the cone half-angle $\alpha$, and the photon frequency $\omega$.
  • Because $n_1^2\kappa_1\approx n_2^2\kappa_2$, similar trapping conditions can be reached for atoms of different principal quantum numbers by adjusting the transverse momentum, favoring high-$n$ CRAs at lower light frequencies.
  • The composed field carries zero net orbital angular momentum, so trapped atoms do not experience the rotation transfer associated with a single vortex beam.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same convolution formula would apply to any one-valence-electron atom, so the method could in principle be adapted to ground-state atoms or non-circular Rydberg states, though the wells would be sized differently.
  • The paper does not simulate what a finite aperture or aberrated spatial light modulator does to the ideal infinite Bessel superposition; a numerical beam-propagation study would show whether the one-atom-per-site lattice survives in practice.
  • The periodic potential suggests a direct way to test the corrected circular-orbit approximation: measure the trap depth as a function of longitudinal position for a single CRA, since the naive and corrected approximations diverge most when $\cos(2k_z Z)\ne 0$.
  • An experimental array built from this scheme could use the lattice spacing and well depth to estimate motional frequencies and interaction strengths between neighbouring CRAs, quantities the paper does not compute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a scheme to trap circular Rydberg atoms (CRAs) using the ponderomotive potential of a standing wave formed by superposing four Bessel vortex beams: two with opposite topological charges ±m and two with opposite propagation directions ±kz, all at equal intensity. The authors first derive the free-electron ponderomotive energy for a single Bessel vortex and then, after azimuthal and longitudinal symmetrization, obtain a time-averaged potential V_e = (1/4) V_e^0 F_m(κr, φ_r) cos²(k_z z). They convolve this with a hydrogenic CRA wavefunction to obtain the atomic potential V_CRA(P, Φ, Z) in Eq. (26). A corrected classical circular orbit (ccco) approximation is developed, which accounts for the finite width of the electron annulus in the longitudinal direction via a Bessel-function factor; the approximation is compared with exact numerical integration in Fig. 1 and shows excellent agreement. The paper then presents three-dimensional potential landscapes for n = 52 CRAs at ω = 15 eV, showing a lattice along the beam axis with a single CRA per site, and discusses how to scale the trap to other n by adjusting κ and ω. The central claim is that this configuration provides a 3D ponderomotive trap with one CRA at each lattice site and zero net orbital angular momentum.

Significance. If the proposed trap is experimentally realizable, it would offer a new route to confining circular Rydberg atoms in a three-dimensional optical lattice with the advantages of a ponderomotive potential: reduced ac Stark shifts and suppressed field-induced radiation compared to dipole-force traps. The analytical derivation is a significant strength: the free-electron potential is derived from first principles, the atomic potential is computed by exact convolution with the hydrogenic wavefunction, and the corrected classical circular orbit approximation is a genuine improvement over the usual cco, as demonstrated in Fig. 1. The scaling relation n₁²κ₁ ≈ n₂²κ₂ for different principal quantum numbers is a concrete, falsifiable design rule. No parameters are fitted to data, and the potential is obtained entirely from the specified beam and atom inputs; this makes the proposal transparent and easy to test.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 2–4, Eq. (1)] The paper never converts the dimensionless potential V/(V_e^0/4) into an absolute trap depth for any concrete laser intensity. V_e^0 = e²E₀²/(4m_eω²) is defined in Eq. (1), but E₀ is never specified, and all figures and scaling statements are presented purely in dimensionless units. Without an absolute depth, the central claim that a CRA 'could be trapped' at each lattice site has no quantitative support: the reader cannot assess whether the well depth exceeds the atom's kinetic energy (e.g., the recoil or thermal energy), whether it can confine the atom against gravity, or whether the required laser power is experimentally feasible. A benchmark with a stated intensity, e.g., for the n = 52, ω = 15 eV case, giving a trap depth of, say, 1 MHz in temperature units, and the corresponding required power, should be provided.
  2. [Section II.B, Eq. (26), and Section III (ω = 15 eV benchmark)] The atomic potential is computed as an expectation value in the unperturbed hydrogenic CRA state, and the benchmark uses ω = 15 eV (λ = 82.65 nm), which is about 3000 times larger than the n = 52 CRA binding energy (≈ 5 meV). Single-photon ionization is therefore energetically allowed, and the field may also mix the CRA state with nearby Rydberg levels. The paper does not estimate the photoionization rate or the ac Stark shifts at the intensity needed to reach a useful trap depth, nor does it justify that the 'rapidly oscillating' condition of Sec. II.A is satisfied in a regime where the atom survives long enough to be trapped. If ionization or level mixing is significant, the computed surface is not the actual trapping potential. This is load-bearing for the feasibility claim.
  3. [Section II.A, Eq. (2) and (15); Section I (SLM/FEL implementation)] The derivation assumes ideal, infinite, non-normalizable Bessel beams (the normalization N = sqrt(2π/κ) is fixed formally, but the beam has infinite energy). The comparison with experiment is limited to a statement that the scheme 'should be implementable using SLM or FEL.' The paper does not quantify how a finite aperture, a Gaussian envelope, or the finite interaction region of an FEL would modify the potential landscape, the trap depth, or the lattice homogeneity. A finite Bessel beam necessarily has a finite longitudinal extent, and the intensity envelope will vary along the propagation axis; the effect of these deviations on the trap depth and on the number of usable lattice sites should be addressed for the proposal to be credible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 6 caption] There is a typo in the Fig. 6 caption: 'paramters' should be 'parameters'.
  2. [Section II.A, Eq. (11)] The notation with overlines in the superposition (A_κ,̄m,̄k_z,Λ) is not defined explicitly; the reader has to infer that the overlines denote the superposition of ±m and ±k_z. Please define these symbols in the text.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 1] The caption says 'The atom's position and vortex-light parameters are indicated in the figure,' but the figure does not show these values in the text provided. Please include the specific values of n, m, ω, α, and the fixed coordinates in the caption or in the figure itself.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 2] The three-dimensional plot in Fig. 2(a) would be more informative if the color scale included numerical values of V/(V_e^0/4) and if the axes were labeled with physical units (nm) consistently, as is done in the two-dimensional panels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the potential is computed from stated first-principles inputs, and internal approximations are checked against the exact integral rather than used as fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: it starts from the standard free-electron ponderomotive energy e^2 E^2/(4 m_e ω^2), constructs the four-beam Bessel vortex superposition, computes the time-averaged field square analytically, and convolves it with the hydrogenic CRA wavefunction to obtain the atomic PPE in Eq. (26). No parameter is fitted to a target trapping quantity, and no benchmark value is extracted from the quantity being predicted. The corrected classical circular orbit (ccco) approximation in Eq. (34) is introduced as a large-n simplification and is validated against the paper's own exact Eq. (26); this is an internal consistency check, not a circular prediction. The design condition κ rhat ~ |m|-1 is a stated beam-parameter selection rule, and the scaling n1^2 κ1 ≈ n2^2 κ2 is derived from the wavefunction radius scaling, not from the potential output. The claimed lattice and petal periodicities follow directly from the analytic forms cos^2(k_z Z) and cos^2[m(φ + π/2)], so reproducing them numerically is confirmation of the formulas, not circularity. The paper does omit quantitative absolute trap depths and photoionization-rate checks at the 15 eV benchmark, but that is a correctness/completeness concern, not an input-output circularity: the derivation does not presuppose the trapping conclusion. No load-bearing self-citation was found; the cited experimental and theoretical works are external and are used as background or motivation. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting is performed. The beam parameters and the condition κ rhat ≈ |m|-1 are design choices, not fitted constants. The central result is an analytic derivation from a standard ponderomotive Hamiltonian; the main assumptions are domain-level approximations about the atom and the beam.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The alkali valence electron can be described by the hydrogen-like wavefunction of Eq. (21), neglecting quantum defects and core electrons.
    Used in Section II.B to compute the atomic PPE by convolution; adequate for high-l circular Rydberg states but not exact for alkali atoms.
  • domain assumption The ponderomotive energy of a free electron, averaged over the optical cycle, is a valid effective potential for a bound electron when the field oscillates rapidly compared with the electron's internal motion.
    Stated at the start of Section II.A and used throughout; standard for far-off-resonance traps but the paper does not check the adiabaticity inequalities for the benchmark Rydberg parameters.
  • domain assumption The four Bessel vortex beams are ideal, monochromatic, non-normalizable modes whose superposition yields the intensity pattern of Eq. (12).
    Introduced in Section II.A; real beams have finite aperture, intensity envelopes, and possibly absorption, which are not modeled.
  • domain assumption The CRA remains in the unperturbed eigenstate |n, l=n-1, m_l=n-1> when computing the expectation value in Eq. (26).
    This is first-order perturbation theory; the paper does not estimate state mixing or ac Stark-induced transitions for the benchmark parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional trapping of circular Rydberg atoms by a superimposed vortex light beam." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VCP4JQ5G

@misc{pith2026250820362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional trapping of circular Rydberg atoms by a superimposed vortex light beam},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VCP4JQ5G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20362}
}
read the original abstract

We propose to trap circular Rydberg atoms (CRAs) by a ponderomotive potential well formed with a superimposed vortex light beam. We calculate analytically the ponderomotive potential energy for a Bessel vortex light beam. We work out a corrected version of the classical circular orbit approximation for a CRA which fits the exact result much better than the usual approximation. We reveal the three-dimensional characteristics of the potential well for some benchmark values of the CRA principal quantum number and beam parameters such as the frequency, the opening angle and topological charge of the vortex. We investigate how we can achieve similar trapping effects for different principal quantum numbers by varying beam parameters. The potential provides a lattice structure in the beam axis where one CRA could be trapped at each lattice site.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20362 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Comparison between the exact and cco or ccco approximate results for the atomic PPE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Three-dimensional (panel a) and two-dimensional (panels b and c) distributions of atomic PPE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Compared to the |m| = 5 case, the |m| = 3 configu￾ration produces a broader potential well in the transverse radial direction (P), accompanied by a slightly narrower confinement along the longitudinal axis (Z). Modulations in the azimuthal direction are visualized in …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Petal-shaped atomic PPE in the transverse plane for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Atomic PPE for a CRA, demonstrating the impact of the principal quantum number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures,

    O. M. Marago, P. H. Jones, P. G. Gucciardi, G. Volpe, et al. , “Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (2013) 807–819

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Nanoscale optical trapping: A Review,

    C. Bradac, “Nanoscale optical trapping: A Review,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6 (2018) 1800005

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms,

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, “Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms,” Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 132–142 [arXiv:2002.07413]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays,

    D. Bluvstein et al. , “Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays,” Nature 626 (2024) 58–65 [arXiv:2312.03982]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Detecting axion dark matter with Rydberg atoms via induced electric dipole transitions,

    G. Engelhardt, A. Bhoonah, and W. V. Liu, “Detecting axion dark matter with Rydberg atoms via induced electric dipole transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 023017 [arXiv:2304.05863]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Rydberg-atom-based single-photon detection for haloscope axion searches,

    E. Graham et al. , “Rydberg-atom-based single-photon detection for haloscope axion searches,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 032009 [arXiv:2310.15352]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Cavity-Enhanced Rydberg Atom Microwave Receiver,

    B. Liu et al. , “Cavity-Enhanced Rydberg Atom Microwave Receiver,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 42 (2025) 053201 [arXiv:2404.06915]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Dark matter detection using optically trapped Rydberg atom tweezer arrays

    S. Chigusa, et al. , “Dark matter detection using optically trapped Rydberg atom tweezer arrays.” arXiv:2507.12860

    arXiv

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Towards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms,

    T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortinas, et al. , “Towards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 011032 [arXiv:1707.04397]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Quantum computing with circular Rydberg atoms,

    S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson, “Quantum computing with circular Rydberg atoms,” PRX Quantum 2 (2021) 030322

    2021

  3. [11]

    Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers,

    P. Mehaignerie, Y. Machu, A. D. Hernandez, G. Creutzer, et al. , “Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers,” PRX Quantum 6 (2025) 010353 [arXiv:2407.04109]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Demonstration of Three-Dimensional Electrostatic Trapping of State-Selected Rydberg Atoms,

    S. D. Hogan and F. Merkt, “Demonstration of Three-Dimensional Electrostatic Trapping of State-Selected Rydberg Atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 043001

    2008

  5. [13]

    Production and trapping of cold circular Rydberg atoms,

    D. A. Anderson, A. Schwarzkopf, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, “Production and trapping of cold circular Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 88 (2013) 031401

    2013

  6. [14]

    Full-gray optical trapping by high-order multipole-resonant gradient forces in structured light,

    Y. Zhang, et al. , “Full-gray optical trapping by high-order multipole-resonant gradient forces in structured light,” Phys. Rev. A 110 (2024) 063517

    2024

  7. [15]

    Ponderomotive Optical Lattice for Rydberg Atoms,

    S. K. Dutta, J. R. Guest, D. Feldbaum, A. Walz-Flannigan, and G. Raithel, “Ponderomotive Optical Lattice for Rydberg Atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 5551–5554

    2000

  8. [16]

    Trapping Rydberg Atoms in an Optical Lattice,

    S. E. Anderson, K. C. Younge, and G. Raithel, “Trapping Rydberg Atoms in an Optical Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 263001

    2011

  9. [17]

    Photoionization of Rydberg atoms in optical lattices,

    R. Cardman, J. L. MacLennan, S. E. Anderson, Y. J. Chen, and G. Raithel, “Photoionization of Rydberg atoms in optical lattices,” New J. Phys. 23 (2021) 063074 [arXiv:2102.09622]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Three-dimensional trapping of individual Rydberg atoms in ponderomotive bottle beam traps,

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. de Leseleuc, et al. , “Three-dimensional trapping of individual Rydberg atoms in ponderomotive bottle beam traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 023201 [arXiv:1908.00853]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Array of Individual Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers,

    B. Ravon, P. Mehaignerie, Y. Machu, A. D. Hernandez, et al. , “Array of Individual Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 093401 [arXiv:2304.04831]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Threading an atom with light,

    R. G. Corti˜ nas, “Threading an atom with light,” Physical Review A 109 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Fluorescence-lifetime-limited trapping of Rydberg helium atoms on a chip,

    V. Zhelyazkova, M. Zesko, H. Schmutz, J. A. Agner, and F. Merkt, “Fluorescence-lifetime-limited trapping of Rydberg helium atoms on a chip,” Mol. Phys. 117 (2019) 2980–2989 [arXiv:1904.07628]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Laser trapping of circular Rydberg atoms,

    R. G. Cortinas, M. Favier, B. Ravon, P. Mehaignerie, et al. , “Laser trapping of circular Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 123201 [arXiv:1911.02316]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Long-Lived Circular Rydberg Qubits of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers,

    C. Holzl, A. Gotzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, “Long-Lived Circular Rydberg Qubits of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers,” Phys. Rev. X [arXiv:2401.10625]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45 (1992) 8185–8189

    1992

  17. [25]

    Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum,

    M. W. Beijersbergen, L. Allen, H. E. L. O. van der Veen, and J. P. Woerdman, “Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum,” Opt. Commun. 96 (1993) 123–132

    1993

  18. [26]

    Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate,

    M. W. Beijersbergen, R. P. C. Coerwinkel, M. Kristensen, and J. P. Woerdman, “Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate,” Opt. Commun. 112 (1994) 321–327

    1994

  19. [27]

    Optics of laser beams with screw dislocations,

    V. Y. Bazhenov, M. S. Soskin, M. V. Vasnetsov, and I. V. Basistiy, “Optics of laser beams with screw dislocations,” Opt. Commun. 103 (1993) 422–428

    1993

  20. [28]

    Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams,

    C. Maurer, A. Jesacher, S. Furhapter, S. Bernet, et al. , “Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams,” New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 78

    2007

  21. [29]

    Generation of hybrid optical trap array by holographic optical tweezers,

    X. Li, Y. Zhou, Y. Cai, Y. Zhang, et al. , “Generation of hybrid optical trap array by holographic optical tweezers,” Front. Phys. 9 (2021) 591747. 10

    2021

  22. [30]

    Rotating single atoms in a ring lattice generated by a spatial light modulator,

    X. He, P. Xu, J. Wang, and M. Zhan, “Rotating single atoms in a ring lattice generated by a spatial light modulator,” Opt. Express 17 (2009) 21007–21014

    2009

  23. [31]

    Theory of Optical Trapping by an Optical Vortex Beam,

    J. Ng, Z. Lin, and C. T. Chan, “Theory of Optical Trapping by an Optical Vortex Beam,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 103601

    2010

  24. [32]

    Ultraprecise Rydberg atomic localization using optical vortices,

    N. Jia, J. Qian, T. Kirova, G. Juzeliunas, and H. R. Hamedi, “Ultraprecise Rydberg atomic localization using optical vortices,” Opt. Express 28 (2020) 36936–36952 [arXiv:2005.10725]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Confinement of ultracold atoms in a Laguerre–Gaussian laser beam created with diffractive optics,

    S. A. Kennedy, G. W. Biedermann, J. T. Farrar, et al. , “Confinement of ultracold atoms in a Laguerre–Gaussian laser beam created with diffractive optics,” Opt. Commun. 321 (2014) 110–115 [arXiv:1308.1326]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Tighter spots of light with superposed orbital-angular-momentum beams,

    P. Woznizk, P. Banzer, F. Bouchard, E. Karimi, et al. , “Tighter spots of light with superposed orbital-angular-momentum beams,” Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 021803 [arXiv:1606.00244]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Generation of superposed orbital angular momentum beams using a free-electron laser oscillator,

    P. Liu, J. Yan, A. Afanasev, S. V. Benson, et al. , “Generation of superposed orbital angular momentum beams using a free-electron laser oscillator,” Opt. Express 32 (2024) 2235–2244

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.