Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Apparatus for quantum-mixture research in microgravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A compact atom-chip payload produces 41K-87Rb Bose-Einstein condensate mixtures at an order-of-magnitude higher flux than previous mobile sources, and a tuned switch-off delay makes their release effectively force-free.

desk verdict High-flux K-Rb BEC mixture on a rocket payload is a solid, directly measured benchmark, but the 'force-free release' and 1 µm/s Eötvös projection lean on a fitted eddy-current model with known failures. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20820 v1 pith:DRGAE6OM submitted 2025-08-28 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phquant-ph

Baptist Piest , Jonas Böhm , Timothé Estrampes , Annie Pichery , Pawe{l} Arciszewski , Wolfgang Bartosch , Sören Boles , Klaus Döringshoff
show 18 more authors
Michael Elsen Priyanka Guggilam Ortwin Hellmig Christian Kürbis Dorthe Leopoldt Gabriel Müller Alexandros Papakonstantinou Christian Reichelt André Wenzlawski Thijs Wendrich Éric Charron Achim Peters Klaus Sengstock Andreas Wicht Patrick Windpassinger Jens Grosse Naceur Gaaloul Ernst Maria Rasel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords Bose-Einsteincondensatemixturesatomchipmicrogravitysoundingrocketpayload41K-87Rbmixturereleasedynamicsdifferentialaccelerationequivalenceprinciple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a compact atom-chip apparatus, built for a sounding-rocket flight, that creates quantum-degenerate mixtures of 41K and 87Rb with about ten times more atomic flux than previous mobile or space-based sources. It also establishes a release protocol: by inserting a delay between switching off the slow external coils and the fast chip wires, the transient magnetic forces that would kick the two species apart can be made to cancel, leaving the clouds co-located to within their own sizes. The authors model the switch-off with a calibrated Biot-Savart field calculation in which the eddy-current decay times are fitted, and they reproduce differential-position scans across the delay. They further show that images of the expanding immiscible mixtures at three orientations to gravity match a parameter-free 3D Gross-Pitaevskii simulation, with the residual discrepancy attributed to the simplified release model. If right, this gives future space missions an atom-chip source with the flux and differential-velocity control needed for mixture physics and equivalence-principle tests.

What carries the argument

The central object is the differential acceleration formula Delta-a(t) = (mK - mRb)/(mK mRb) times the gradient of (mu dot B): because 41K and 87Rb have different masses but equal magnetic moment, any magnetic-field gradient during release accelerates them differently. The switch-off delay Delta-t between the slow, high-inductance bias coils and the fast chip structures is the tunable control that lets the integrated gradient impulse cross zero. A calibrated Biot-Savart model of the chip and coils supplies the time-dependent field; eddy currents are absorbed into two fitted decay times. For the expansion images, the coupled 3D Gross-Pitaevskii equations with experimentally measured scatterin

What would settle it

Measure B(r,t) at the trap position with a fast in-situ magnetic field probe during a switch-off scan and compare with the calibrated two-time-constant model; if the measured gradient impulse differs by more than the fit uncertainty, the zero-crossing protocol and the extrapolated 1 micrometer per second weak-trap velocity fail. Alternatively, repeat the Delta-t scan in microgravity and check whether the residual differential velocity remains zero over a longer free-fall time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a single, fully integrated atom-chip payload can both produce quantum-degenerate mixtures of 41K and 87Rb with an order of magnitude more flux than previous mobile sources and release them without a differential kick. The authors derive the differential acceleration Delta-a = (mK - mRb)/(mK mRb) times the gradient of (mu dot B), and show that because the two species have equal magnetic moments but different masses, even a small magnetic-field gradient during switch-off separates them. By scanning the delay Delta-t between switching off the slow bias coils and the fast chip structures, they find a zero crossing where the integrated impulse cancels; the remain

Load-bearing premise

The switch-off model assumes the chip current decays exponentially and the coil current decays linearly, with all eddy currents squeezed into two fitted constants; if the real decay shape differs, the zero-crossing delay and the predicted 1 micrometer per second residual velocity are wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With a 2.3 s cycle, the payload generates BEC mixtures with tunable ratios up to 2.5e5 87Rb and 5e4 41K atoms, an order of magnitude above earlier mobile or microgravity sources, enabling higher-statistics mixture experiments on small platforms.
  • The switch-off delay provides a controllable way to null the differential release velocity; for weak traps the model extrapolates to 1.0 micrometers per second with 100 ns timing, meeting the colocation requirement for equivalence-principle tests at the 1e-15 level.
  • In microgravity, the optimized release leaves expansion governed only by intra- and interspecies interactions, opening the way to study shell-shaped and bubble ground states of mixtures.
  • The same sequences produce condensates at every tested angle between 0 and 75 degrees to gravity, so changing the gravity orientation does not require re-optimization of the apparatus.
  • Comparing full transient-switch-off simulations with instantaneous release quantifies how much of the observed species separation comes from magnetic transients, separating interaction effects from apparatus effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ground-fitted decay constants may not transfer unchanged to flight: eddy currents depend on temperature, stray fields, and mechanical stress, so the Delta-t scan should be repeated in orbit; the projection to 1 micrometer per second is a statement about the modeled environment, not a measured flight value.
  • The same principle of shaping the relative timing of slow and fast current paths could be applied to other atom-chip systems as a general differential-kick nulling procedure, even where the goal is not space but precision interferometry on a tabletop.
  • Adding an in-situ magnetic field sensor at the trap position during future campaigns would turn the fitted eddy-current parameters into measured quantities and likely explain the residual mismatch seen at 0 degrees, sharpening the zero crossing.
  • The flux gain and the release control are partly independent: even if the flux claim is challenged by other platforms, the switch-off timing technique stands on its own as a method to co-locate two species after release.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. Piest et al. describe a fully integrated sounding-rocket payload (MAIUS-B) that produces dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates of 41K and 87Rb on an atom chip. They report high atom numbers and a short cycle time, claiming an order-of-magnitude flux improvement over previous compact and mobile sources. The central methodological contribution is a time-delayed switch-off of chip and bias-coil currents designed to cancel magnetic release kicks; a zero crossing in the differential position after 20.38 ms time of flight is observed and modeled with a classical trajectory code using two fitted current-decay constants. The authors also present 3D Gross-Pitaevskii simulations of immiscible mixture expansion at three tilt angles, with good agreement at 30.9° and 60.6° and a 57 μm discrepancy at 0°, and they extrapolate the switch-off technique to weak traps, claiming a differential velocity of about 1 μm/s and compatibility with equivalence-principle tests at the 10^-15 level.

Significance. High-flux dual-species BEC generation on a compact, robust platform is of genuine practical importance for future space missions. The observed co-location of the two species and the mass scaling of the release kick are valuable experimental results, and the parameter-free GPE comparison at nonzero tilt angles is a strength. However, the two headline release claims—the 'effectively force-free release' and the 10^-15 equivalence-principle projection—are not yet established at the claimed level because the zero-velocity inference rests on a single-TOF measurement plus a calibrated model with reduced chi-squared 3.3, and because the same model fails to reproduce the φ=0° mixture separation. These issues are fixable with additional measurements and a systematic error budget.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (1) and Fig. 4] Zero final differential position after a single time of flight does not imply zero final differential velocity unless the acceleration profile has a special time symmetry. For example, a(t)=A for 0≤t<T/2 and a(t)=-3A for T/2≤t<T gives Δz(T)=0 but Δv(T)=-AT. The sentence 'if the measured relative position Δz is zero after a fixed time of flight, the associated relative velocity has to be zero as well' is therefore not generally valid. The subsequent statement that 'the latter has been confirmed by the simulation described in Sec. 4.3' is not an independent confirmation, because that simulation uses the same two fitted decay constants that were calibrated to this dataset (τ_chip=38±2 μs, τ_coil=470±24 μs). To support the force-free-release claim, the authors should measure the differential position at at least two TOFs, or otherwise directly constrain the velocity, for the same Δt, or show
  2. [§2.2, Fig. 4; §2.3] The release model is calibrated, not derived from first principles: Sec. 2.2 states that the decay times are treated as free parameters because eddy currents cannot be measured externally. The fit quality is marginal (χ²_r=3.3), and the same model, when used in the GPE simulations, leaves a 57±10 μm residual at φ=0° that the authors attribute to an 'oversimplified release model' (§2.3). Since the zero-crossing Δt=60 μs, the residual Δz=(26±10) μm, and the weak-trap extrapolation δΔv/δΔt=(10.2±0.7) μm/ms² all depend on this model, the resulting Δv=1 μm/s and Eötvös-10^-15 projection inherit an unquantified systematic error. I recommend adding a systematic error budget that varies the decay shape and amplitude—for example, multi-exponential coil transients, additional eddy-current time constants, or a measured B(t) from a nearby magnetometer—and reporting the resulting range of zero-crossi
  3. [§2.2, §4.3] The derivation of the mass-acceleration relation assumes B(r_K,t)=B(r_Rb,t) throughout the release. This is only approximately true: the two trapped BECs are displaced by gravitational sag and interspecies repulsion (the paper itself reports separations of order 20 μm in the release dynamics, Fig. 5), and the chip potential has strong gradients and curvature. Any position-dependent B breaks the exact relation Δa(t) ∝ a_K(t), so the zero-Δz-to-zero-Δv inference fails even if the single-TOF issue is set aside. The authors should quantify the error introduced by this assumption, e.g., by evaluating Eq. (1) at the two different instantaneous center-of-mass positions.
  4. [§4.4] The description of the GPE release simulation says that divergences in the extracted trap characteristics over intervals shorter than 10 μs are 'smoothed out'. This procedure is not specified. Since the transient release is exactly the effect under study, the smoothing scheme (interpolation method, window, or exclusion) should be stated; otherwise the comparison in Fig. 5 is not reproducible. At minimum, the authors should show that the φ=0° residual is not an artifact of this smoothing.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §2.2] The word 'exact model' in the abstract and text overstates the status of a calibrated model with two free parameters; consider wording such as 'calibrated model' or 'validated model'.
  2. [Fig. 3] It is not clear whether the plotted points for all references are total atom numbers or BEC fractions, and the line styles are not all defined in the caption. A legend or table would clarify the comparison.
  3. [Eq. (2)] The symbol r'_j is used both as a vector in the numerator and as a scalar length in the denominator; please define |r'_j| explicitly.
  4. [§4.4] The sentence 'the final position of the atoms takes into account the distance travelled by the atoms during the time of flight' is tautological; clarify whether this refers to the difference between release time and imaging time or to the projection onto the camera axis.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the release characterization: the model's decay constants are fit to the Δz(Δt) data, then that same fitted model is used to 'confirm' zero differential velocity and to extrapolate the force-free release; the flux benchmark is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2.2 (Fig. 4) and Sec. 4.3]
    "The solid blue line is the prediction based on a classical trajectory with assumed decay constants of (470 ± 24)µs for the coils and (38 ± 2)µs for the chip structures. [...] Since the magnetic field near the atoms depends on additional eddy currents which cannot be measured externally, we treat the decay times of the currents in the simulation as free parameters without altering the general linear or exponential shape."

    Sec. 4.3 says the two eddy-current decay times are free parameters fitted to reproduce the observed Δz(Δt) data. In Sec. 2.2 the same classical-trajectory model is drawn as the solid blue 'prediction' in Fig. 4, and the sentence 'The latter has been confirmed by the simulation described in Sec. 4.3' uses that fitted model to assert that the differential velocity is zero at the zero crossing. The unmeasured velocity-zero claim is therefore not an independent prediction; it is an output of the very model calibrated against the measurement from which the zero crossing is inferred. The measured zero crossing of Δz itself is empirical, so the circularity is partial: it affects the force-free/Δv=1 µm/s extrapolation chain, not the flux benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's headline flux result is an independent measurement (atom numbers and 2.3 s cycle time) compared with external/previous-flight data and does not reduce to fitted inputs. The release study, however, is calibrated rather than first-principles: the decay constants are treated as free parameters and fit to the same Δz(Δt) data that the model is said to 'predict,' and the zero-velocity confirmation inherits that fit. This is the main circular element. Separately, the claim that Δz=0 after one TOF implies Δv=0 is not generally valid for sign-changing accelerations, and the simulation used to confirm it is the same fitted model; this is a robustness/correctness concern rather than a definitional circularity. The GPE mixture simulation in Sec. 2.3 uses the calibrated release model and refines the mount angle from data; the residual 57±10 µm failure at φ=0° is disclosed as an 'oversimplified release model,' which is honest calibration, not circularity. Self-citations ([32] for the GPE toolkit) are not load-bearing for the main claims. Overall score 4: partial circularity in the release prediction/confirmation chain, with central flux and co-location measurements retaining independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central load-bearing modeling is a classical trajectory simulation with two fitted decay constants; the GPE simulation imports those fitted parameters and a fitted angle, while taking atom numbers and scattering lengths from experiment and literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • atom chip current decay time tau_chip = (38 +/- 2) microseconds
    Fitted to the differential-position data of Fig. 4b; used in the classical trajectory model to simulate the release kick and to extrapolate to weak traps.
  • bias coil current decay time tau_coil = (470 +/- 24) microseconds
    Fitted to the differential-position data of Fig. 4b together with tau_chip; the two-parameter fit yields reduced chi-squared 3.3.
  • apparatus angle phi = 0.0, 30.9, 60.6 degrees
    Refined by matching the simulated absolute position of the 87Rb cloud to the measured position after 25 ms time of flight, rather than using the nominal mount angle (which is adjustable in steps of 2.5 degrees).
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Biot-Savart law for magnetic fields from chip currents
    Used in Eq. (2) to compute the time-varying magnetic field from the current-carrying structures. This is a standard physics law.
  • standard math Zeeman energy shift U = mu_B g_F m_F |B(r,t)|
    Eq. (3) defines the trapping potential; standard for low-field-seeking alkali atoms in a magnetic trap.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field constant over the size of the overlapping BECs, B(r_K,t) = B(r_Rb,t)
    Sec. 2.2 uses this to derive a_Rb/a_K = m_K/m_Rb and to infer zero relative velocity from zero position difference after time of flight. Reasonable for small, overlapping clouds.
  • domain assumption Classical equations of motion with zero initial velocity at the trap minimum
    Sec. 4.3 assumes initial position at the trap minimum and zero initial velocity for both species; neglects quantum pressure for the center-of-mass motion.
  • domain assumption Literature s-wave scattering lengths a_Rb = 98.96 a0, a_K = 60.54 a0, a_KRb = 165.3 a0
    Sec. 4.4 uses these in the coupled Gross-Pitaevskii equation; values are taken from cited measurements and not measured in this paper.
  • domain assumption Harmonic approximation of the trapping potential with smoothing of short-time anharmonic divergences
    Sec. 4.4 extracts trap frequencies and positions from the Hessian of the chip model; divergences shorter than 10 microseconds are smoothed out, which affects the simulated release dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Apparatus for quantum-mixture research in microgravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DRGAE6OM

@misc{pith2026250820820,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Apparatus for quantum-mixture research in microgravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DRGAE6OM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20820}
}
abstract

Experiments with ultracold quantum gases are a rapidly advancing research field with many applications in fundamental physics and quantum technology. Here, we report on a high-flux generation of Bose-Einstein condensate mixtures of $^{41}$K and $^{87}$Rb, using a fully integrated sounding rocket setup. We investigate the release and the free expansion of the quantum mixtures for different orientations to gravity. The release dynamics are governed by the mixture interactions as well as the decaying magnetic field during the release. The latter can be minimized by a dedicated switch-off protocol of the trap generating currents where an exact model enabled us to characterize the interaction effects. Our results establish a new benchmark for generating ultracold mixtures on mobile platforms, with direct relevance for future experiments on interacting quantum gases and tests of the equivalence principle in space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20820 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the experimental setup. a) Overall payload [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Generation of BEC mixtures with different ratios in the BEC fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of atom numbers and preparation times of BECs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Measurement of the release kick and determination of an effectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absorption images of mixed BECs of 41K and 87Rb after 25 ms of free expansion, measured at different apparatus orientations (φ = 0◦ , 30.9 ◦ , and 60.6 ◦ ). The angle of the gravity vector with respect to the atom chip is depicted in the upper right corner. The horizon…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental sequence for BEC mixture generation and release studies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) MOT loading of 87Rb (red), 41K (blue), and 41K with simulta￾neously loaded 87Rb atoms (red+blue). The saturation values are indicated with black-dashed lines (NRb = 9.0 · 108 , NK = 1.7 · 108 , NK+Rb = 1.2 · 108 ). The number of 41K atoms in the combined MOT decreas…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Theory of Cubic-Phase Dynamics in the Linear Potential

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The cubic time-phase of a wave packet in a linear potential equals -(F_phys+F_eigen)(F_phys+2F_eigen)/(6ℏm), with two zeros, and this phase becomes measurable via the relative phase of two colliding Airy packets.

  2. Trap-Quenched Matter-Wave Optics in Space

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A space-based rubidium condensate was collimated by sudden trap relaxation and collective-mode excitation, reaching ~78 pK expansion energy in the imaging plane, with simulations indicating a dual-species path to 10^-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum mixtures of ultracold gases of neutral atoms

    Matteo Zaccanti Cosetta Baroni, Giacomo Lamporesi. Quantum mixtures of ultracold gases of neutral atoms. Nat. Rev. Phys., 6(736-752), 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00773-6

    doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00773-6 2024

  2. [2]

    J. P. D’Incao, M. Krutzik, E. Elliott, and J. R. Williams. Enhanced asso- ciation and dissociation of heteronuclear feshbach molecules in a micro- gravity environment. Phys. Rev. A, 95(1):012701, 2017. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012701

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012701 2017

  3. [3]

    J. P. D’Incao, Jason R. Williams, Naceur Gaaloul, Maxim A. Efremov, Ste- fan Nimmrichter, B. Schrinski, Ethan Elliott, and Wolfgang Ketterle. Per- spectives and opportunities: A molecular toolkit for fundamental physics and matter-wave interferometry in microgravity. Quantum Science and Technology, 8(1):014004, 2023. doi: 10.1088/2058-9565/aca04a

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aca04a 2023

  4. [4]

    A. Wolf, P. Boegel, M. Meister, A. Balaˇ z, N. Gaaloul, and M. A. Efremov. Shell-shaped Bose-Einstein condensates based on dual-species mixtures. Phys. Rev. A, 106:013309, Jul 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.013309. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.013309

    doi:10.1103/physreva.106.013309 2022

  5. [5]

    Perspective on quantum bubbles in microgravity

    Nathan Lundblad, David C Aveline, Antun Balaˇ z, Elliot Bentine, Nicholas P Bigelow, Patrick Boegel, Maxim A Efremov, Naceur Gaaloul, Matthias Meister, Maxim Olshanii, Carlos A R S´ a de Melo, Andrea Tononi, Smitha Vishveshwara, Angela C White, Alexander Wolf, and Barry M Gar- raway. Perspective on quantum bubbles in microgravity. Quantum Sci. Technol., 8...

    doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acb1cf 2023

  6. [6]

    Rasel, Alain Robert, Noah Saks, Mike Salter, Dennis Schlippert, Christian Schubert, Thilo Schuldt, Carlos F

    Holger Ahlers, Leonardo Badurina, Angelo Bassi, Baptiste Battelier, Quentin Beaufils, Kai Bongs, Philippe Bouyer, Claus Braxmaier, Oliver Buchmueller, Matteo Carlesso, Eric Charron, Maria Luisa Chiofalo, Robin Corgier, Sandro Donadi, Fabien Droz, Robert Ecoffet, John Ellis, Fr´ ed´ eric Est` eve, Naceur Gaaloul, Domenico Gerardi, Enno Giese, Jens Grosse, ...

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    M¨ untinga, H

    H. M¨ untinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, S. Arnold, D. Becker, K. Bongs, H. Dittus, H. Duncker, N. Gaaloul, C. Gherasim, E. Giese, 18 C. Grzeschik, T. W. H¨ ansch, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, E. Ka- jari, S. Kleinert, C. L¨ ammerzahl, W. Lewoczko-Adamczyk, J. Malcolm, N. Meyer, R. Nolte, A. Peters, M. Popp, J. Reichel, A. Roura, J. Rudol...

    2013

  8. [8]

    A high-flux BEC source for mobile atom interferometers

    Jan Rudolph, Waldemar Herr, Christoph Grzeschik, Tammo Sternke, Alexander Grote, Manuel Popp, Dennis Becker, Hauke M¨ untinga, Hol- ger Ahlers, Achim Peters, et al. A high-flux BEC source for mobile atom interferometers. New J. Phys., 17(6):065001, 2015. URL https: //doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/065001

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/6/065001 2015

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Lachmann, Stephan T

    Dennis Becker, Maike D. Lachmann, Stephan T. Seidel, Holger Ahlers, Aline N. Dinkelaker, Jens Grosse, Ortwin Hellmig, Hauke M¨ untinga, Vladimir Schkolnik, Thijs Wendrich, Andr´ e Wenzlawski, Benjamin Weps, Robin Corgier, Tobias Franz, Naceur Gaaloul, Waldemar Herr, Daniel L¨ ...

    2018

  2. [10]

    Elliott, Markus C

    Ethan R. Elliott, Markus C. Krutzik, Jason R. Williams, Robert J. Thompson, and David C. Aveline. NASA’s Cold Atom Lab (CAL): sys- tem development and ground test status. npj Microgravity, 4(1):16, Aug

  3. [11]

    Elliott, David C

    Ethan R. Elliott, David C. Aveline, Nicholas P. Bigelow, Patrick Boegel, Sofia Botsi, Eric Charron, Jos´ e P. D’Incao, Peter Engels, Timoth´ e Es- trampes, Naceur Gaaloul, James R. Kellogg, James M. Kohel, Norman E. Lay, Nathan Lundblad, Matthias Meister, Maren E. Mossman, Gab...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Condon, M

    G. Condon, M. Rabault, B. Barrett, L. Chichet, R. Arguel, H. Eneriz- Imaz, D. Naik, A. Bertoldi, B. Battelier, P. Bouyer, and A. Landragin. All-Optical Bose-Einstein Condensates in Microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 19 123:240402, Dec 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.240402. UR...

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Christian Vogt, Marian Woltmann, Sven Herrmann, Claus L¨ ammerzahl, Henning Albers, Dennis Schlippert, and Ernst M. Rasel. Evaporative cooling from an optical dipole trap in microgravity. Phys. Rev. A, 101: 013634, Jan 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013634. URL https: //link....

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Meng He, X. Chen, J. Fang, Q. Chen, H. Sun, Y. Wang, J. Zhong, L. Zhou, C. He, J. Li, D. Zhang, G. Ge, W. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Li, X. Zhang, L. Qin, Z. Chen, R. Xu, Y. Wang, Z. Xiong, J. Jiang, Z. Cai, K. Li, G. Zheng, W. Peng, J. Wang, and M. Zhan. The space cold atom interferom...

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Atom interferometry in an einstein elevator

    Celia Pelluet, Romain Arguel, Martin Rabault, Vincent Jarlaud, Clement M´ etayer, Brynle Barrett, Philippe Bouyer, and Baptiste Battelier. Atom interferometry in an einstein elevator. Nat. Commun., 16(4812), 2025. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60042-7

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    The Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory

    Kai Frye, Sven Abend, Wolfgang Bartosch, Ahmad Bawamia, Dennis Becker, Holger Blume, Claus Braxmaier, Sheng-wey Chiow, Maxim A Efre- mov, Wolfgang Ertmer, Peter Fierlinger, Tobias Franz, Naceur Gaaloul, Jens Grosse, Christoph Grzeschik, Ortwin Hellmig, Victoria A Hender- son, ...

    2021

  9. [17]

    L´ ev` eque, C

    T. L´ ev` eque, C. Fallet, J. Lefebve, A. Piquereau, A. Gauguet, B. Battelier, P. Bouyer, N. Gaaloul, M. Lachmann, B. Piest, E. Rasel, J. M¨ uller, C. Schu- bert, Q. Beaufils, and F. Pereira Dos Santos. Carioqa: Definition of a quan- tum pathfinder mission, 2022. URLhttps://ar...

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Trimeche, B

    A. Trimeche, B. Battelier, D. Becker, A. Bertoldi, P. Bouyer, C. Braxmaier, E. Charron, R. Corgier, M. Cornelius, K. Douch, N. Gaaloul, S. Herrmann, J. M¨ uller, E. Rasel, C. Schubert, H. Wu, and F. Pereira dos Santos. Concept study and preliminary design of a cold atom interf...

    2019

  11. [19]

    Quantum gravity gra- diometry for future mass change science

    Ben Stray, Xavier Bosch-Lluis, Robert Thompson, Clayton Okino, Nan Yu, Norman Lay, Brian Muirhead, Jason Hyon, Holly Leopardi, Pe- ter Brereton, Anand Mylapore, Bryant Loomis, Scott Luthcke, Par- minder Ghuman, Srinivas Bettadpur, Maike Diana Lachmann, Thomas Stolz, Christophe...

  12. [20]

    Christian Deppner, Waldemar Herr, Merle Cornelius, Peter Stromberger, Tammo Sternke, Christoph Grzeschik, Alexander Grote, Jan Rudolph, Sven Herrmann, Markus Krutzik, Andr´ e Wenzlawski, Robin Corgier, Eric Charron, David Gu´ ery-Odelin, Naceur Gaaloul, Claus L¨ ammerzahl, Ach...

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Williams, Robert J

    Naceur Gaaloul, Matthias Meister, Robin Corgier, Annie Pichery, Patrick B¨ ogel, Waldemar Herr, Holger Ahlers, Eric Charron, Jason R. Williams, Robert J. Thompson, Wolfgang P. Schleich, Ernst M. Rasel, and Nichols P. Bigelow. A space-based quantum gas laboratory at picokelvin ...

    2022

  14. [22]

    R. A. Carollo, D. C. Aveline, B. Rhyno, S. Vishveshwara, C. Lannert, J. D. Murphree, E. R. Elliott, J. R. Williams, R. J. Thompson, and N. Lundblad. Observation of ultracold atomic bubbles in orbital microgravity. Nature, 606:281–286, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04639-8. URL...

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Lachmann, Holger Ahlers, Dennis Becker, Aline N

    Maike D. Lachmann, Holger Ahlers, Dennis Becker, Aline N. Dinke- laker, Jens Grosse, Ortwin Hellmig, Hauke M¨ untinga, Vladimir Schkol- nik, Stephan T. Seidel, Thijs Wendrich, Andr´ e Wenzlawski, Benjamin Car- rick, Naceur Gaaloul, Daniel L¨ udtke, Claus Braxmaier, Wolfgang Er...

  16. [24]

    Williams, Charles A

    Jason R. Williams, Charles A. Sackett, Holger Ahlers, David C. Ave- line, Patrick Boegel, Sofia Botsi, Eric Charron, Ethan R. Elliott, Naceur Gaaloul, Enno Giese, Waldemar Herr, James R. Kellogg, James M. Ko- hel, Norman E. Lay, Matthias Meister, Gabriel M¨ uller, Holger M¨ ul...

  17. [25]

    Reinhardt, Timoth´ e Estrampes, Jannik Str¨ ohle, Enno Giese, Holger Ahlers, Waldemar Herr, Christian Schubert, ´Eric Charron, Holger M¨ uller, Jason R

    Matthias Meister, Gabriel M¨ uller, Patrick Boegel, Albert Roura, Annie Pichery, David B. Reinhardt, Timoth´ e Estrampes, Jannik Str¨ ohle, Enno Giese, Holger Ahlers, Waldemar Herr, Christian Schubert, ´Eric Charron, Holger M¨ uller, Jason R. Williams, Ernst M. Rasel, Wolfgang...

    2025

  18. [26]

    AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space

    AEDGE collaboration. AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space. EPJ Quantum Technol., 7, 2020. doi: 10. 1140/epjqt/s40507-020-0080-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/ s40507-020-0080-0

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Kasevich

    Peter Asenbaum, Chris Overstreet, Minjeong Kim, Joseph Curti, and Mark A. Kasevich. Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence princi- ple at the 10 −12 level. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:191101, Nov 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.191101. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/...

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    Atomic source selection in space-borne gravitational wave detection

    S Loriani, D Schlippert, C Schubert, S Abend, H Ahlers, W Ertmer, J Rudolph, J M Hogan, M A Kasevich, E M Rasel, and N Gaaloul. Atomic source selection in space-borne gravitational wave detection. New J. Phys., 21(6):063030, June 2019. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab22d0. URL https:...

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Overcoming loss of contrast in atom interferometry due to gravity gradients

    Albert Roura, Wolfgang Zeller, and Wolfgang P Schleich. Overcoming loss of contrast in atom interferometry due to gravity gradients. New J. Phys., 16(12), 2014. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123012. URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123012

    2014 doi

  22. [30]

    D’Amico, G

    G. D’Amico, G. Rosi, S. Zhan, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Fattori, and G. M. Tino. Canceling the gravity gradient phase shift in atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:253201, Dec 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.253201. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.253201

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    Hogan, and Mark A

    Chris Overstreet, Peter Asenbaum, Tim Kovachy, Remy Notermans, Ja- son M. Hogan, and Mark A. Kasevich. Effective inertial frame in an atom interferometric test of the equivalence principle. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:183604, May 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.183604. URL https:...

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Efficient numerical description of the dynamics of interacting multispecies quantum gases

    Annie Pichery, Matthias Meister, Baptist Piest, Jonas B¨ ohm, Ernst Maria Rasel, Eric Charron, and Naceur Gaaloul. Efficient numerical description of the dynamics of interacting multispecies quantum gases. A VS Quantum Science, 5(4):044401, 11 2023. ISSN 2639-0213. doi: 10.111...

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Bassi, L

    A. Bassi, L. Cacciapuoti, S. Capozziello, S. Dell’Agnello, E. Diamanti, D. Giulini, L. Iess, P. Jetzer, S. K. Joshi, A. Landragin, C. Le Poncin- Lafitte, E. Rasel, A. Roura, C. Salomon, and H. Ulbricht. A way forward for fundamental physics in space. npj Microgravity, 8(49), 2...

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    A Dual-Species Atom Interferometer Payload for Operation on Sounding Rockets

    Michael Elsen, Baptist Piest, Fabian Adam, Oliver Anton, Pawe l Ar- ciszewski, Wolfgang Bartosch, Dennis Becker, Kai Bleeke, Jonas B¨ ohm, S¨ oren Boles, Klaus D¨ oringshoff, Priyanka Guggilam, Ortwin Hellmig, Is- abell Imwalle, Simon Kanthak, Christian K¨ urbis, Matthias Koch...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bose-Einstein condensation of K-41 and Rb-87 on an atom chip for sounding rocket missions

    Baptist Piest. Bose-Einstein condensation of K-41 and Rb-87 on an atom chip for sounding rocket missions. PhD thesis, Leibniz Universit¨ at Han- nover, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.15488/11014

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    K¨ urbis, A

    Ch. K¨ urbis, A. Bawamia, M. Kr¨ uger, R. Smol, A. Peters, A. Wicht, and G. Tr¨ ankle. Extended cavity diode laser master-oscillator-power-amplifier for operation of an iodine frequency reference on a sounding rocket. Appl. Opt., 59, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.379955

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Landini, S

    M. Landini, S. Roy, L. Carcagn ´ ı, D. Trypogeorgos, M. Fattori, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno. Sub-doppler laser cooling of potassium atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 84:043432, Oct 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043432. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043432

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    G. Modugno. Bose-Einstein Condensation of Potassium Atoms by Sym- pathetic Cooling. Science, 294(5545):1320–1322, oct 2001. URL https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1066687

    2001 doi

  31. [39]

    Wechselwirkung in Bose-Fermi-Quantengasen

    Carsten Klempt. Wechselwirkung in Bose-Fermi-Quantengasen. Phd thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universit¨ at Hannover. URL https: //doi.org/10.15488/6906. 23

    doi

  32. [40]

    Robert L. D. Campbell, Robert P. Smith, Naaman Tammuz, Scott Beattie, Stuart Moulder, and Zoran Hadzibabic. Efficient production of large K-39 Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A, 82(6), dec 2010. URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/physreva.82.063611

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    Species-selective microwave cooling of a mixture of rubidium and caesium atoms

    M Haas, V Leung, D Frese, D Haubrich, S John, C Weber, A Rauschen- beutel, and D Meschede. Species-selective microwave cooling of a mixture of rubidium and caesium atoms. New J. Phys., 9(5):147–147, may 2007. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/147

    2007 doi

  34. [42]

    Marzok, B

    C. Marzok, B. Deh, Ph. W. Courteille, and C. Zimmermann. Ultracold thermalization of Li-7 and Rb-87. Phys. Rev. A, 76(5), nov 2007. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.76.052704

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    Experi- mental investigation of evaporative cooling mixture of bosonic 87 Rb and fermionic 40 K atoms with microwave and radio frequency radiation

    Peng-Jun Wang, De-Zhi Xiong, Zheng-Kun Fu, and Jing Zhang. Experi- mental investigation of evaporative cooling mixture of bosonic 87 Rb and fermionic 40 K atoms with microwave and radio frequency radiation. Chi- nese Physics B, 20(1):016701, jan 2011. URL https://doi.org/10.10...

    2011

  36. [44]

    Resolution of the colocation problem in satellite quantum tests of the universality of free fall

    Sina Loriani, Christian Schubert, Dennis Schlippert, Wolfgang Ertmer, Franck Pereira Dos Santos, Ernst Maria Rasel, Naceur Gaaloul, and Pe- ter Wolf. Resolution of the colocation problem in satellite quantum tests of the universality of free fall. Phys. Rev. D, 102:124043, Dec...

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the weak equivalence principle at the 10 −17 level

    Christian Struckmann, Robin Corgier, Sina Loriani, Gina Kleinsteinberg, Nina Gox, Enno Giese, Gilles M´ etris, Naceur Gaaloul, and Peter Wolf. Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the weak equivalence principle at the 10 −17 level. Phys. Rev. D,...

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Expansion Dynamics of a Shell-Shaped Bose-Einstein Conden- sate

    Fan Jia, Zerong Huang, Liyuan Qiu, Rongzi Zhou, Yangqian Yan, and Da- jun Wang. Expansion Dynamics of a Shell-Shaped Bose-Einstein Conden- sate. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:243402, Dec 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 129.243402. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 129.243402

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates of 23Na and 41K with tunable interactions

    Jaeryeong Chang, Sungjun Lee, Yoonsoo Kim, Younghoon Lim, and Jee Woo Park. Dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates of 23Na and 41K with tunable interactions. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:013183, Feb 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013183. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysR...

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Modugno, F

    M. Modugno, F. Dalfovo, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, and F. Minardi. Dy- namics of two colliding bose-einstein condensates in an elongated magneto- static trap. Phys. Rev. A, 62:063607, Nov 2000. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA. 24 62.063607. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.62. 063607

    doi

  41. [49]

    Production of large 41K bose-einstein condensates using D1 gray molasses

    Hao-Ze Chen, Xing-Can Yao, Yu-Ping Wu, Xiang-Pei Liu, Xiao-Qiong Wang, Yu-Xuan Wang, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan. Production of large 41K bose-einstein condensates using D1 gray molasses. Phys. Rev. A, 94:033408, Sep 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033408. URL https://link.aps...

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    Engineering long-range interactions between ultracold atoms with light

    T Xie, A Orb´ an, X Xing, E Luc-Koenig, R Vexiau, O Dulieu, and N Bouloufa-Maafa. Engineering long-range interactions between ultracold atoms with light. J. Phys. B, 55, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6455/ac4b40

    2022

  43. [51]

    A double species 23na and 87rb bose–einstein condensate with tunable miscibility via an interspecies feshbach resonance

    Fudong Wang, Xiaoke Li, Dezhi Xiong, and Dajun Wang. A double species 23na and 87rb bose–einstein condensate with tunable miscibility via an interspecies feshbach resonance. J. Phys. B, 49(1):015302, nov

  44. [52]

    Wacker, N

    L. Wacker, N. B. Jørgensen, D. Birkmose, R. Horchani, W. Ertmer, C. Klempt, N. Winter, J. Sherson, and J. J. Arlt. Tunable dual-species bose-einstein condensates of 39K and 87Rb. Phys. Rev. A, 92:053602, Nov

  45. [53]

    S. B. Papp, J. M. Pino, and C. E. Wieman. Tunable miscibility in a dual- species bose-einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:040402, 2008

    2008

  46. [54]

    Time-of-flight expansion of binary bose–einstein condensates at finite temperature

    K L Lee, N B Jørgensen, L J Wacker, M G Skou, K T Skalmstang, J J Arlt, and N P Proukakis. Time-of-flight expansion of binary bose–einstein condensates at finite temperature. New Journal of Physics, 20(5):053004, may 2018. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaba39. URL https://dx.doi.org/...

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Robust and compact single-lens crossed-beam optical dipole trap for bose-einstein condensation in microgravity, 2025

    Jan Simon Haase, Alexander Fieguth, Igor Br¨ ockel, Janina Hamann, Jens Kruse, and Carsten Klempt. Robust and compact single-lens crossed-beam optical dipole trap for bose-einstein condensation in microgravity, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15302

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Reinaudi, T

    G. Reinaudi, T. Lahaye, Z. Wang, and D. Gu´ ery-Odelin. Strong saturation absorption imaging of dense clouds of ultracold atoms. Opt. Lett., 32(21): 3143–3145, Nov 2007. doi: 10.1364/OL.32.003143. URL https://opg. optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-21-3143

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    Ferrari, M

    G. Ferrari, M. Inguscio, W. Jastrzebski, G. Modugno, G. Roati, and A. Si- moni. Collisional Properties of Ultracold K-Rb Mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:053202, Jul 2002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.053202. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.053202. 25

    2002 doi

  50. [59]

    Wacker, N

    L. Wacker, N. B. Jørgensen, D. Birkmose, R. Horchani, W. Ertmer, C. Klempt, N. Winter, J. Sherson, and J. J. Arlt. Tunable dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates of 39K and 87Rb. Phys. Rev. A, 92:053602, Nov

  51. [60]

    M. E. Tuckerman. Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation. Oxford University Press, 2010

    2010

  52. [61]

    Computing the Ground State Solution of Bose–Einstein Condensates by a Normalized Gradient Flow

    Weizhu Bao and Qiang Du. Computing the Ground State Solution of Bose–Einstein Condensates by a Normalized Gradient Flow. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 25(5):1674–1697, 2004. doi: 10.1137/S1064827503422956. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503422956

    2004 doi

  53. [62]

    Lehtovaara, J

    L. Lehtovaara, J. Toivanen, and J. Eloranta. Solution of time-independent Schr¨ odinger equation by the imaginary time propagation method. J. Comput. Phys., 221(1):148–157, 2007. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect. co...

    2007 doi

  54. [63]

    Marte, T

    A. Marte, T. Volz, J. Schuster, S. D¨ urr, G. Rempe, E. G. M. van Kem- pen, and B. J. Verhaar. Feshbach Resonances in Rubidium 87: Precision Measurement and Analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:283202, Dec 2002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.283202. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 11...

    2002 doi

  55. [64]

    Burchianti, C

    A. Burchianti, C. D 'Errico, S. Rosi, A. Simoni, M. Modugno, C. Fort, and F. Minardi. Dual-species Bose-Einstein condensate of 41K and 87Rb in a hybrid trap. Phys. Rev. A, 98(6), dec 2018. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/physreva.98.063616

    2018

  56. [65]

    Feshbach spectroscopy of a K −Rb atomic mixture

    Francesca Ferlaino, Chiara D’Errico, Giacomo Roati, Matteo Zaccanti, Massimo Inguscio, Giovanni Modugno, and Andrea Simoni. Feshbach spectroscopy of a K −Rb atomic mixture. Phys. Rev. A, 73:040702, Apr

  57. [66]

    URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053602

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053602. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053602

    doi

  58. [71]

    Potassium ground-state scattering parame- ters and Born-Oppenheimer potentials from molecular spectroscopy

    Stephan Falke, Horst Kn¨ ockel, Jan Friebe, Matthias Riedmann, Eberhard Tiemann, and Christian Lisdat. Potassium ground-state scattering parame- ters and Born-Oppenheimer potentials from molecular spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A, 78:012503, Jul 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012503...

    2008 doi

  59. [2006]

    URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.040702

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.040702. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.040702. 26

    doi

  60. [2015]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-4075/49/1/015302

    doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/1/015302. URL https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-4075/49/1/015302

    doi

  61. [2018]

    doi: 10.1038/s41526-018-0049-9

    ISSN 2373-8065. doi: 10.1038/s41526-018-0049-9. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41526-018-0049-9

    doi

  62. [2021]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21628-z

    doi

  63. [2024]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-50585-6

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50585-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-50585-6

    doi

  64. [2025]

    URL https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00338-1

    doi: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00338-1. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00338-1

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.