Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Edge states, pairing, and sorting of motile chiral particles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chiral active particles accumulate at hard walls by tracing skipping orbits whose circulation is opposite their spin.

desk verdict Clean experimental demonstration of single-particle chiral sorting and a pairing switch, but the model's boundary-hugging claim is asserted, not derived, in the parameter regime where the experiments run. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00729 v2 pith:WJU3ZGK7 submitted 2025-08-31 cond-mat.soft

Raushan Kant , Ananyo Maitra , A K Sood , Sriram Ramaswamy This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords chiralactivematterpolarparticlesgranularrodsskippingorbitsedgeaccumulationsortingapolar-to-polarpairingtransitionself-alignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that chiral active polar particles, self-propelled rods that turn in a fixed sense, become trapped at hard boundaries, where they skate along the wall in orbits whose circulation is opposite to their bulk rotation. The trapping is stronger than for achiral rods, and the direction of the edge orbit is fixed by the particle's handedness, so a simple guideway can sort a racemic mixture with about 91% fidelity, even one particle at a time. The authors propose a minimal two-equation model in which the wall acts through a radial force, and chirality plus a polar self-alignment coupling converts that force into an effective outward push that makes the particle hug the wall. They also predict and observe that two same-chirality particles switch from spinning as an apolar pair to walking as a polar pair when a background of beads gets denser.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reduced boundary dynamics (Eqs. 5-7) in coordinates (r, psi), where psi is the angle between the particle's polarity and the local radial direction. The steady-state relation Omega = v0/R sin psi - (v0 gamma/2 mu) sin 2psi decides which wall-tangent orbits are stable: for large Omega (the experimental regime) only the orbit whose circulation opposes the bulk spin survives, and the particle is turned toward the wall, giving an effective outward radial force proportional to v0 and Omega. The gamma term (self-alignment, a dissipative polarisation-force coupling) is what makes polarity matter; without it the mechanism reduces to ordinary chiral spinners and the edg

What would settle it

Concrete test: take a chiral polar rod whose chirality is small enough that Eq. (7) admits solutions (R Omega / v0 below roughly unity). If both clockwise and counter-clockwise boundary orbits appear with substantial weight, or if an apolar chiral spinner with the same Omega accumulates at the wall nearly as strongly as the polar rod, then the boundary-hugging mechanism proposed here is not the operative one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chirality and polarity together create edge states: a chiral active polar particle near a hard wall moves in a skipping orbit that goes clockwise for a counter-clockwise-rotating particle and vice versa, producing a strong, stationary accumulation at the boundary. In the model, position obeys r-dot = v0 p-hat + mu F(r), and orientation obeys p-hat-dot = gamma Pi·F(r) + Omega epsilon·p-hat. Reducing to the radial distance r and the angle psi between polarity and the radial direction gives the steady-state condition Omega = v0/R sin psi - (v0 gamma/2 mu) sin 2psi; for the measured strong chirality this equation has no solution, and only the orbit that turns the partic

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the wall acting on the particle as a purely radial force with only the self-alignment coupling gamma and the chirality Omega in the orientation dynamics; if the neglected chiral cross-couplings (odd mobility, chiral force density, off-diagonal mobilities) contribute significantly, the predicted single-sense skipping orbits and the outward force could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At N=36, about 85% of chiral rods sit at the boundary versus 55% of achiral rods, and after 40 s more than 90% of chiral rods have still not escaped the edge.
  • A cup-and-straw guideway sorts a racemic mixture with efficiency about 0.91, nearly independent of N, and the sorting works with a single particle in the reservoir, unlike earlier collision-dependent schemes.
  • The theory predicts that if chirality Omega is small enough for Eq. (7) to have solutions, both senses of boundary orbit are locally stable, but noise should still favour the boundary-hugging orbit.
  • Increasing the packing fraction of a non-motile bead medium switches a homochiral pair from an apolar spinner (stable below phi_b ~ 0.40) to a polar circle walker (stable above phi_b ~ 0.65), while heterochiral pairs stay polar.
  • Tuning chirality is a handle for transport and separation that does not require microfabricated obstacle arrays or patterned channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the effective outward force is indeed proportional to v0 and Omega, edge density should scale with motility and rotation rate; a direct measurement of boundary fraction versus v0 and Omega would test that scaling without needing the full mechanical model.
  • Beyond the paper: because sorting does not depend on collisions, the same principle should work at arbitrarily low density, suggesting the guideway could be extended to continuous streams of dilute chiral swimmers.
  • Beyond the paper: the model singles out polarity as essential - apolar chiral spinners with the same Omega should not show the strong boundary accumulation; an experiment comparing bent rods with chiral but non-polar disks would isolate the self-alignment mechanism.
  • Beyond the paper: the gamma coupling is dissipative and arises from a mobility matrix; in a thermalized system the edge-binding would be an equilibrium-like response, so measuring escape times as a function of activity or temperature could discriminate this mechanism from purely kinematic wall interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on vibrated granular chiral active polar particles (CAPPs) confined in a circular hard-walled domain. The central experimental findings are that CAPPs form robust 'skipping orbits' at the boundary whose net circulation is opposite to their bulk chiral rotation, that this leads to a pronounced edge accumulation exceeding that of achiral polar particles, and that the directed edge motion supports high-fidelity chiral sorting even for a single particle. The authors propose a minimal deterministic model (Eqs. 3-6) in which wall forces enter both positional and orientational dynamics through a mobility μ and a self-alignment coefficient γ, and they use the fixed-point condition Eq. (7) to derive an effective outward radial force proportional to chirality Ω and motility v0. They further argue from a wall-on-left geometric rule and a flow-alignment interaction that homochiral pairs should switch from apolar spinners to polar circle walkers with increasing bead-medium packing fraction, a prediction confirmed by experiments. A key theoretical difficulty is that the experimental parameters place the system in the regime where Eq. (7) has no solution; the paper then asserts, rather than derives, that only one sense of skipping orbit survives.

Significance. If the theoretical claims were fully established, this would be a valuable contribution: the experiments are direct, the edge-accumulation effect is clearly measured with achiral controls, the single-particle sorting result substantially strengthens earlier work, and the pairing transition is a genuine, tested prediction. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction for small-Ω CAPPs. However, the central explanatory mechanism for the unidirectional skipping orbit—the effective outward radial force from Eq. (7)—does not currently cover the experimental regime, because the fixed points whose stability is analyzed do not exist at the measured parameters. Since the edge-state explanation is load-bearing for the accumulation and sorting conclusions, the theory section needs substantive reworking rather than cosmetic revision. The experimental core is strong enough that the manuscript should be reconsidered after that reworking.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text after Eq. (7); End Matter Fig. 5(c)] Eq. (7) has no solution at the experimental parameters: RΩ/v0 ≈ (0.061 m)(4.68 s⁻¹)/(0.0054 m/s) ≈ 52.9, while max_ψ[sinψ − γR/(2μ) sin2ψ] ≈ 19.4 for γ/μ = 614 m⁻¹. The paper explicitly notes this, but then states that 'only CW orbits survive' because a CCW-oriented walker rotates away and a CW-oriented walker rotates toward the wall. That is a claim about the nonlinear dynamics of the coupled (r,ψ) system, not a consequence of the local fixed-point analysis: the fixed points whose stability is discussed do not exist in this regime. The derivation of the outward radial force proportional to Ωv0 and the predicted CW-only edge state therefore does not apply at the experimental operating point. Please provide a phase-plane or escape-rate analysis of Eqs. (5)-(6) with a hard-wall potential and noise, or numerical simulations, demonstrating that the no-fixed-point regime still yields a single
  2. [End Matter, first paragraph] The minimal model deliberately neglects odd mobility, a chiral force density, and off-diagonal mobility terms, and the paper asserts that these 'do not lead to any qualitatively new feature not already generated by the terms we retain.' This assertion is load-bearing because γ/μ is fitted from achiral APP boundary angles and then used to place the CAPPs in the no-solution regime of Eq. (7). If an odd-mobility contribution or a chiral propulsion offset contributes appreciably to the orientational dynamics at a wall, the inferred γ/μ and the regime placement could change. Please quantify these neglected terms—for example, by measuring the rotational response of a CAPP to a controlled applied force, or by comparing simulations with and without odd mobility—rather than only asserting their irrelevance.
  3. [Main text, paragraph containing Eq. (7)] The stability discussion immediately before and after Eq. (7) is a ψ-only argument that presupposes the existence of the fixed points defined by ˙r = 0 = ˙ψ. In the experimental regime those fixed points are absent, so the statements about 'the CW solution' and 'the CCW solution' in that paragraph are not well-defined. The sentence 'For the CW solution... the walker is turned towards the wall, cosψ0 increases, which via (5) means an increased effective force towards positive r' also appears to have a sign inconsistency: if cosψ0 increases, Eq. (5) at fixed point requires μF = −v0 cosψ0 to become more negative, i.e. a more inward wall force, not a force toward positive r. Please clarify whether 'positive r' means 'toward the wall' and reconcile the sign of F with the stated outward-force mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [End Matter, Fig. 5(c) caption] The caption writes 'For RΩ/6v0 (red dotted line)', which appears to be a typo for RΩ/v0; also the expression 'maxψ(sinψ − γR/2 sin2ψ)' omits the factor 1/μ relative to Eq. (7) (γR/(2μ)). Please make the notation consistent with the main text.
  2. [Abstract and reference list] The abstract uses 'T Barois et al.'; the reference [30] lists 'T. Barois'. Please standardize the name format.
  3. [Fig. 2 and general notation] The symbol ⟨p̂(t)·p̂(0)⟩ is used with a hat on p in Eqs. (1)-(2), but in the text and later equations p̂ is used. The rendering of the circumflex in Eq. (1) is inconsistent; please ensure uniform typesetting.
  4. [End Matter, sorting-efficiency definition] The sorting efficiency is defined as NC/(NC+NW), so the denominator only counts collected particles and ignores particles still in the reservoir. This is reasonable, but please state explicitly that the efficiency is conditional on emergence from the reservoir, since the text says the experiment runs until about 80% of particles emerge.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: measured parameters are independently obtained; the edge-state and pairing claims do not reduce to fitted outputs.

full rationale

The central model (Eqs. 3–7) is self-contained. The parameters v0 and Omega are measured directly from bulk CAPP motion, and mu/gamma is inferred from achiral APP wall orientations — an independent dataset, not from the chiral edge-state data being explained. The fixed-point condition (7) is then used to identify a regime; the subsequent claim that only CW orbits survive for large Omega is an additional dynamical argument, not an assumption of the conclusion. The pairing transition is predicted using flow-alignment from Ref. [39], a prior experimentally supported result; although some authors overlap, the present pairing measurement is an independent test of that prediction. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The reviewer's concern that Eq. (7) has no solution at the experimental parameters is a question of whether the analytic fixed-point analysis covers the full regime, not a circularity: the paper does not disguise this as a solved fixed-point prediction but argues separately for the survival of only one orbit. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rely on measured parameters (Omega, v0) and one fitted parameter (mu/gamma from APP data), plus several simplifying modeling assumptions about the nature of wall forces and the dominance of the self-alignment coupling. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'outward force' is an effective quantity derived from the model.

free parameters (1)
  • mu_over_gamma = ~0.0016 m
    Ratio of mobility to polar-alignment coupling, estimated from the boundary orientation psi_0 of achiral polar particles (End Matter Fig. 5a). Used to compute gamma/mu ~ 614 m^-1 and to argue the system lies in the no-solution regime of Eq. (7).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Inertialess dynamics for granular rods despite macroscopic mass
    Equation (3) is the inertialess limit; the End Matter argues m->0 via an Onsager reduction, but vibrated granular rods are macroscopic and inertia may not be negligible on short times.
  • domain assumption Wall force is purely radial, F = F(r) r_hat, with no tangential component
    Used to reduce Eqs. (3)-(4) to (5)-(6) and derive the steady-state condition (7). Real contacts have friction and tangential forces.
  • ad hoc to paper The polar-alignment coupling gamma dominates over odd mobility and other off-diagonal chiral couplings
    End Matter lists neglected terms (odd mobility, chiral force density, equilibrium cross-couplings) and asserts they produce no qualitatively new features, but no calculation is shown.
  • domain assumption Flow-induced polar alignment from the bead medium follows the weathercock coupling of [39] and applies to CAPP pairs
    Used to predict the pairing transition; no direct measurement of bead flow or alignment interaction is made in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Geometric argument that each CAPP treats the other as a steric wall with the same wall-on-left preference
    The apolar spinner prediction for homochiral pairs on a bare substrate is argued verbally from boundary behavior, not derived from the equations of motion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Edge states, pairing, and sorting of motile chiral particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WJU3ZGK7

@misc{pith2026250900729,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Edge states, pairing, and sorting of motile chiral particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WJU3ZGK7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00729}
}
read the original abstract

We present experiments on chiral active polar particles, realized as vibrated granular rods, revealing the formation of robust ``skipping orbits'' at hard boundaries. These edge states exhibit a net circulation opposite to the particles' intrinsic rotation and lead to a pronounced accumulation at the boundary, stronger than for their achiral counterparts. The directed nature of these orbits provides a simple yet high-fidelity mechanism for chiral sorting -- even for solitary particles, unlike in T Barois et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 , 238003 (2020). We propose a unified theoretical framework for boundary interactions of both chiral and achiral particles. In this model, an effective outward radial force, proportional to motility and chirality, explains the observed boundary-hugging. Our theory predicts, and our experiments confirm, a transition in the pairing of two particles of the same chirality, from apolar spinners to polar circle walkers, with increasing packing fraction of an ambient medium of beads.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00729 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Chiral particles exhibit skipping orbits at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison, CAPPs and APPs: (a) Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Top: shows a time sequence of an apolar chi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Design for sorting of chiral mixtures: (a) A cup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Distribution of angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Topologically Protected Edge Transport in Doubly Chiral Active Particles

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Doubly chiral active Brownian particles with competing intrinsic rotation and translation-rotation coupling exhibit topologically protected boundary transport without backscattering, as shown by theory, simulation, an...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    L. P. Dadhichi, A. Maitra, and S. Ramaswamy, Origins and diagnostics of the nonequilibrium character of active systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2018, 123201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    A. B. Harris, R. D. Kamien, and T. C. Lubensky, Molec- ular chirality and chiral parameters, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 1745 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Maitra, Activity unmasks chirality in liquid- crystalline matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics16(2024)

    A. Maitra, Activity unmasks chirality in liquid- crystalline matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics16(2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    B. C. Van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. Irvine, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Spatiotemporal order and emergent edge currents in active spinner materials, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences113, 12919 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Scholz, M

    C. Scholz, M. Engel, and T. P¨ oschel, Rotating robots move collectively and self-organize, Nature communica- tions9, 931 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Workamp, G

    M. Workamp, G. Ramirez, K. E. Daniels, and J. A. Di- jksman, Symmetry-reversals in chiral active matter, Soft Matter14, 5572 (2018)

    2018

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nature physics15, 1188 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Massana-Cid, D

    H. Massana-Cid, D. Levis, R. J. H. Hern´ andez, I. Pag- onabarraga, and P. Tierno, Arrested phase separation in chiral fluids of colloidal spinners, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042021 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    H.-M. Chun, X. Durang, and J. D. Noh, Emergence of nonwhite noise in langevin dynamics with magnetic lorentz force, Physical Review E97, 032117 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Hargus, J

    C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Odd diffusivity of chiral random motion, Physical review let- ters127, 178001 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Banerjee and R

    D. Banerjee and R. Alert, Active screws: Emergent ac- tive chiral nematics of spinning self-propelled rods, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12263 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, I. Abdoli, J.-U. Sommer, H. L¨ owen, and A. Sharma, Collisions enhance self-diffusion in odd- diffusive systems, Physical Review Letters129, 090601 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    P. L. Muzzeddu, E. Kalz, A. Gambassi, A. Sharma, and R. Metzler, Self-diffusion anomalies of an odd tracer in soft-core media, New Journal of Physics27, 033025 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    E. Kalz, H. D. Vuijk, J.-U. Sommer, R. Metzler, and A. Sharma, Oscillatory force autocorrelations in equilib- rium odd-diffusive systems, Physical Review Letters132, 057102 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Langer, A

    A. Langer, A. Sharma, R. Metzler, and E. Kalz, Dance of odd-diffusive particles: A fourier approach, Physical Review Research6, 043036 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    E. Kalz, S. Ravichandir, J. Birkenmeier, R. Met- zler, and A. Sharma, Reversal of tracer advection and 6 hall drift in an interacting chiral fluid, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04544 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Chiral active matter, Euro- physics Letters139, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Mecke, J

    J. Mecke, J. O. Nketsiah, R. Li, and Y. Gao, Emer- gent phenomena in chiral active matter, National Science Open3, 20230086 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    I. H. Riedel, K. Kruse, and J. Howard, A self-organized vortex array of hydrodynamically entrained sperm cells, Science309, 300 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    Patra, K

    P. Patra, K. Beyer, A. Jaiswal, A. Battista, K. Rohr, F. Frischknecht, and U. S. Schwarz, Collective migration reveals mechanical flexibility of malaria parasites, Nature Physics18, 586 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    W. R. DiLuzio, L. Turner, M. Mayer, P. Garstecki, D. B. Weibel, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Es- cherichia coli swim on the right-hand side, Nature435, 1271 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Di Leonardo, D

    R. Di Leonardo, D. Dell’Arciprete, L. Angelani, and V. Iebba, Swimming with an image, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 038101 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Lauga, W

    E. Lauga, W. R. DiLuzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone, Swimming in circles: Motion of bacteria near solid boundaries, Biophysical Journal90, 400 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Alvarez, M

    L. Alvarez, M. A. Fernandez-Rodriguez, A. Alegria, S. Arrese-Igor, K. Zhao, M. Kr¨ oger, and L. Isa, Recon- figurable artificial microswimmers with internal feedback, Nature Communications12, 4762 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    K¨ ummel, B

    F. K¨ ummel, B. Ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Circular motion of asymmetric self-propelling particles, Physical Review Letters110, 198302 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Zhang, A

    B. Zhang, A. Sokolov, and A. Snezhko, Reconfigurable emergent patterns in active chiral fluids, Nature commu- nications11, 4401 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Barois, J.-F

    T. Barois, J.-F. Boudet, J. S. Lintuvuori, and H. Kellay, Sorting and extraction of self-propelled chiral particles by polarized wall currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 238003 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Arora, A

    P. Arora, A. Sood, and R. Ganapathy, Emergent stere- oselective interactions and self-recognition in polar chiral active ellipsoids, Science Advances7, eabd0331 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    C. W. Chan, D. Wu, K. Qiao, K. L. Fong, Z. Yang, Y. Han, and R. Zhang, Chiral active particles are sensi- tive reporters to environmental geometry, Nature Com- munications15, 1406 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    R. K. Gupta, R. Kant, H. Soni, A. K. Sood, and S. Ramaswamy, Active nonreciprocal attraction between motile particles in an elastic medium, Phys. Rev. E105, 064602 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Y. Fily, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Cooperative self-propulsion of active and passive rotors, Soft Matter 8, 3002 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    H. J. van Leeuwen, Probl` emes de la th´ eorie ´ electronique du magn´ etisme, Journal de Physique et le Radium2, 361 (1921), pDF available online

    1921

  28. [36]

    Bohr, The doctor’s dissertation (text and translation), inEarly Works (1905–1911), Vol

    N. Bohr, The doctor’s dissertation (text and translation), inEarly Works (1905–1911), Vol. 1, edited by L. Rosen- feld and J. R. Nielsen (Elsevier, 1972) pp. 163, 165–393, originally published as ”Studier over Metallernes Elek- trontheori”, Københavns Universitet (1911)

    1905

  29. [37]

    Supplementary Movies

  30. [38]

    van Teeffelen, U

    S. van Teeffelen, U. Zimmermann, and H. L¨ owen, Clockwise-directional circle swimmer moves counter- clockwise in petri dish- and ring-like confinements, Soft Matter5, 4510 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Kumar, H

    N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Sood, Flock- ing at a distance in active granular matter, Nature com- munications5, 4688 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Narayan, S

    V. Narayan, S. Ramaswamy, and N. Menon, Long-lived giant number fluctuations in a swarming granular ne- matic, Science317, 105 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    R. Kant, R. K. Gupta, H. Soni, A. K. Sood, and S. Ra- maswamy, Bulk condensation by an active interface, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 208301 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Active chiral particles under confinement: surface currents and bulk accumulation phenomena, Soft Matter15, 2627 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    H. H. Wensink and H. L¨ owen, Aggregation of self- propelled colloidal rods near confining walls, Phys. Rev. E78, 031409 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    W. Li, L. Li, Q. Shi, M. Yang, and N. Zheng, Chiral sepa- ration of rotating robots through obstacle arrays, Powder Technology407, 117671 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Mijalkov and G

    M. Mijalkov and G. Volpe, Sorting of chiral microswim- mers, Soft Matter9, 6376 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Shimoyama, K

    N. Shimoyama, K. Sugawara, T. Mizuguchi, Y. Hayakawa, and M. Sano, Collective motion in a system of motile elements, Physical Review Letters76, 3870 (1996)

    1996

  39. [47]

    Brotto, J.-B

    T. Brotto, J.-B. Caussin, E. Lauga, and D. Bartolo, Hy- drodynamics of confined active fluids, Physical Review Letters110, 038101 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Baconnier, O

    P. Baconnier, O. Dauchot, V. D´ emery, G. D¨ uring, S. Henkes, C. Huepe, and A. Shee, Self-aligning polar active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 015007 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Maitra, M

    A. Maitra, M. Lenz, and R. Voituriez, Chiral active hex- atics: Giant number fluctuations, waves, and destruction of order, Physical Review Letters125, 238005 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    A. P. Petroff, C. Whittington, and A. Kudrolli, Density- mediated spin correlations drive edge-to-bulk flow tran- sition in active chiral matter, Physical Review E108, 014609 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature607, 287 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Fast-moving bacteria self-organize into active two-dimensional crys- tals of rotating cells, Physical review letters114, 158102 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Bertrand, J

    T. Bertrand, J. d’Alessandro, A. Maitra, S. Jain, B. Mercier, R.-M. M` ege, B. Ladoux, and R. Voituriez, Clustering and ordering in cell assemblies with generic asymmetric aligning interactions, Physical Review Re- search6, 023022 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Dhakal and J

    S. Dhakal and J. V. Selinger, Statistical mechanics of splay flexoelectricity in nematic liquid crystals, Physi- cal Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics81, 031704 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    Maitra, P

    A. Maitra, P. Srivastava, M. C. Marchetti, S. Ra- maswamy, and M. Lenz, Swimmer suspensions on sub- strates: anomalous stability and long-range order, Phys- ical Review Letters124, 028002 (2020). 7

    2020

  48. [56]

    Kim and S

    S. Kim and S. J. Karrila,Microhydrodynamics: princi- ples and selected applications(Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    E. G. Sinaiski and L. I. Zaichik,Statistical microhydro- dynamics(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    M. D. Graham,Microhydrodynamics, Brownian motion, and complex fluids, Vol. 58 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 8 END MA TTER Additional discussion of the theoretical modelIn this article, we have chosen to use a minimal model of our chiral active particle given by (3) and (...

    2018

  51. [59]

    Indeed, the functional role ofγdoes arise in our experiment primarily due to the proximity of a wall

    do not explicitly introduce theγterm in their orien- tational dynamics, we expect equivalent physical effects to be present in their model. Indeed, the functional role ofγdoes arise in our experiment primarily due to the proximity of a wall. The physics of theγcoupling:In this...

  52. [60]

    self-aligning active particles

    or the coupled dynamics of a polarisation field and a velocity field [39, 55], analogous reactive couplings arise. In the former case,vshould be viewed as the value of the velocity field at the site of the polar particle. In such cases, eliminating the velocity field again lea...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.