Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

A Critical Point on the Hairy Black Hole Phase Boundary in the Improved Holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the improved holographic Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton model, the phase boundary between the two hairy black hole types is a first-order line plus a third-order line, meeting at (765.51, 86.54) MeV.

desk verdict A credible numerical study of two hairy black hole branches, but the claimed third-order transition and critical point rest on a sign error and an unspecified free energy normalization. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03947 v1 pith:CGN63L3C submitted 2025-09-04 hep-th gr-qc

Hong Guo , Wei-Liang Qian , Bean Wang This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords holographicQCDphasediagramEinstein-Maxwell-Dilatonmodelhairyblackholesthird-ordertransitionfirst-ordercriticalendpointbaryonchemicalpotentialgauge/gravityduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the phase boundary between two kinds of hairy black holes in a lattice-calibrated holographic Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton model has two distinct parts: a first-order transition line and a much weaker third-order transition line. The two lines meet at a critical point at baryon chemical potential 765.51 MeV and temperature 86.54 MeV, which is exactly the turning point of the boundary curve. The claim matters because holographic models of this kind are used to simulate the QCD phase diagram at high baryon density, where direct lattice QCD calculations fail. If the claim is right, the standard first-order line is only half the story: there is a second, mild transition on the same boundary, and the endpoint is fixed by the geometry of the boundary curve.

What carries the argument

The sign of the near-horizon expansion coefficient ψ₁ʰ in Eq. (21) decides whether the scalar hair decays monotonically (Type I) or first grows near the horizon (Type II); its vanishing marks the boundary between the two hairy phases. Thermodynamically, the transition order is read from the free energy F(T) at fixed μ_B through dF = s dT and the Ehrenfest classification: a finite jump in entropy gives the first-order line, while a finite discontinuity in ∂²s/∂T² gives the third-order line. The U-shaped boundary curve's turning point is where the two branches meet.

What would settle it

Compute the free energy from an explicit holographic on-shell action, or fix the integration constant in dF = s dT by a stated normalization, and re-examine the upper phase boundary; if the discontinuity in the second temperature derivative of the entropy density vanishes or shifts away from (765.51, 86.54) MeV, the claimed third-order line and the critical point are artifacts of the unspecified free-energy construction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports two distinct hairy black hole solutions in the improved holographic EMD model. Type-I hairy black holes are governed by the scalar potential, with a scalar profile that decays monotonically away from the horizon; Type-II solutions are governed by the nonminimal coupling to the U(1) gauge field, with a scalar profile that first grows near the horizon and then decays. In the (μ_B, T) plane the boundary between the two phases forms a U-shaped curve. The lower segment coincides with the first-order transition previously identified in holographic QCD models; the upper segment, analyzed through the Gibbs free energy and its temperature derivatives, shows a finite discontinuity on

Load-bearing premise

The classification assumes the free energy density is uniquely determined by its temperature differential dF = s dT at fixed chemical potential, but the paper does not specify how the integration constant is fixed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any μ_B above 765.51 MeV, raising the temperature first crosses a sharp first-order transition and then a mild third-order transition on the same phase boundary.
  • The upper third-order line is subtle: free energy, entropy, and ∂s/∂T are continuous, so this transition would be missed by conventional holographic thermodynamic probes.
  • The gravitational origin of the two phases is tied to the competition between V′(ψ) and f′(ψ) in the near-horizon expansion, giving a bulk criterion for which boundary phase dominates.
  • Because the critical point coincides with the turning point of the phase boundary, the endpoint can be read directly from the geometry of the boundary curve rather than from a separate thermodynamic calculation.
  • Targeted modifications of the scalar potential and gauge coupling should allow deliberate engineering of the phase diagram's first-order line and third-order endpoint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the free-energy normalization is left unspecified, the classification of the upper branch as third-order is only as strong as that choice; an explicit on-shell action could confirm or move the line.
  • The same black-hole-physics analysis should apply to other lattice-calibrated EMD models; the coincidence of the critical point with the turning point may be a generic feature of the calibrated parameter set, not a structural necessity.
  • A practical way to search for this weak transition in other holographic models is to look at the nonmonotonicity of the scalar hair near the horizon (the Type II barrier) rather than at boundary free-energy kinks.
  • Tuning f(ψ) and V(ψ) should move the critical point along the boundary; this suggests a design rule for engineering phase diagrams with a desired first-order line length and a third-order endpoint.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the improved holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton model calibrated to lattice QCD at zero baryon chemical potential (Refs. [54,55]) and classifies static hairy black hole solutions by the sign of the near-horizon scalar derivative psi1_h in Eq. (21). It maps a U-shaped phase boundary in the (mu_B,T) plane between Type-I and Type-II hairy phases. The paper claims that the lower branch of this boundary is a first-order phase transition line consistent with earlier work, the upper branch is a subtle third-order line, and the two branches meet at a critical point (mu_B^crit,T^crit)=(765.51,86.54) MeV that coincides with the turning point of the boundary curve.

Significance. The systematic numerical scan and the gravitational classification of two distinct hairy black hole solutions are useful contributions, and the consistency of the first-order segment with previous EMD results is a valuable cross-check. If the claimed third-order line and critical point were firmly established, they would be a nontrivial addition to holographic black hole thermodynamics and could inform model building. However, the thermodynamic derivation on which these new claims rest is incomplete, so the central novelty is not currently supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.B, Eq. (37)] The free energy whose derivatives define the transition order is never properly constructed. With F = -P in Eq. (36), the Gibbs-Duhem relation dP = s dT + rho dmu gives dF = -s dT at fixed mu, not +s dT as printed. If the F(T) curves in Fig. 6 were generated by integrating Eq. (37) literally, they are not the grand potential. Moreover, the differential fixes F only up to a mu-dependent integration constant; the paper does not specify this constant, a reference normalization, or the holographically renormalized on-shell action. Since the first-order transition temperatures are obtained from equality of F branches and the third-order classification requires continuity of F and s across branches, both are sensitive to this unspecified construction. Thus the first-order line, the third-order line, and the critical point (765.51,86.54) MeV are not derived by the text as it stands.
  2. [Sec. IV.B, Figs. 8-9] The third-order claim rests on resolving a 'subtle' discontinuity in the second temperature derivative of the entropy density. No error bars, radial grid convergence tests, or derivative-stencil details are provided. The plotted curves in Fig. 9 appear noisy, e.g. the mu_B=900 panel shows d^2s/dT^2 jumping from about -50 to +50 over roughly 1 MeV, and the mu_B=950 panel shows sharp spikes. Without a convergence study or a quantitative estimate of the jump and its uncertainty, a finite discontinuity cannot be distinguished from numerical noise. Please provide such evidence.
  3. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (21) and Sec. IV.A, Fig. 5] The phase boundary is defined geometrically by the vanishing of the near-horizon coefficient psi1_h, and the U-shaped curve in Fig. 5 is then identified as the thermodynamic phase boundary. However, in equilibrium the coexistence curve should be determined by equality of the relevant thermodynamic potentials, not by the sign of a near-horizon expansion coefficient. The lower branch is checked against previous first-order results, but the upper branch has no independent thermodynamic determination. This reinforces the need for a properly defined, normalized free energy before the phase diagram can be accepted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (16)] The notation A'_t(r) is used, but no A_t field is defined in the ansatz; the gauge field is denoted phi(r). Please clarify or correct the typo.
  2. [Eqs. (22)-(24)] The notation beta_+-prime is confusing; define explicitly that the prime denotes differentiation with respect to psi0_h, and write the derivatives as partial derivatives for clarity.
  3. [Sec. III.A] The integration is started at r_start=10^-8 and truncated at r_end=10, but no convergence test with respect to these cutoffs is reported. A brief check (e.g. varying r_end by a factor of two) would strengthen the numerical claims.
  4. [Fig. 1, left panel] The horizontal axis label 'Phi_cutoff_1 / Phi_max_1' is ambiguous; please spell out the ratio and explain how the cutoff value was chosen.
  5. [Sec. IV] In the introductory sentence, 'thorough Gibbs conditions' should be 'through Gibbs conditions.'

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed coincidence between the critical point and the turning point of the phase boundary is built into the construction; the rest of the model-to-phase-diagram derivation is independent.

  1. self definitional [Section IV A, Fig. 5 text; with Section III B definition of phase boundary via Eq. (21)]
    "These two transition branches converge at a critical point (µcrit B , Tcrit) = (765.51, 86.54)MeV, which exactly corresponds to the turning point of the boundary curve."

    The two transition branches are not independent thermodynamic objects. The paper assigns the lower/right intersection points of the T–ψ0h curves to the first-order line ('the right intersection points (black dots) in Fig. 3 correspond to first-order phase transitions') and the upper/left intersection points to the other boundary ('the left intersection points (gray dots), which are associated with the upper bifurcation of the phase boundary'). These are the two segments of the same U-shaped boundary, so their meeting point is by definition the boundary curve's turning point. The free-energy analysis labels the branches first/third order but cannot move their junction; no independent computation (e.g., vanishing latent heat) is used to fix the endpoint. Thus 'converge at a critical point ..

full rationale

The model parameters are taken from Refs. [54,55], which calibrated to lattice QCD at µB=0, not to the critical point or third-order line claimed here, so the central numerical output is not a fit to its own target. The two hairy solutions, the U-shaped boundary, and the first-order/third-order classification are computed from the bulk equations and the thermodynamic observables, and Ref. [62] is used as methodological precedent rather than as the sole justification for the improved-model result; hence self-citation is not load-bearing. The main definitional circularity is the 'critical point = turning point' claim: once the first-order and third-order lines are identified with the lower and upper branches of the same U-shaped phase boundary, their junction is the turning point by construction. I do not score the sign error in Eq. (37) or the unspecified integration constant in F as circularity — they are correctness/underdetermination risks — though they do mean the thermodynamic-order determination is less secured than the text suggests. The paper itself flags the third-order signal as 'remarkably smooth and subtle', a resolution concern rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All free constants in the action are inherited from the lattice-calibrated model of [55]; the paper introduces no new fitted parameters of its own. The Type I and Type II branches are solution classes of the existing scalar and gauge fields, not new physical entities. The main unstated input is the construction and normalization of the free energy, which is load-bearing for the claimed transition orders.

free parameters (5)
  • Coupling function parameters c1, c2, c3, c4 = -0.27, 0.4, 1.7, 100
    Adopted from the lattice-QCD-calibrated improved EMD model [55]. They control f(psi), which drives Type II solutions and the upper phase boundary.
  • Potential parameters v1, v2, v3, v4 = 0.63, 0.65, -0.05, 0.003
    Adopted from [55]. They control V(psi), which drives Type I solutions and the first-order transition line.
  • Five-dimensional Newton constant kappa_5^2 = 8*pi*0.46
    Calibrated in [55]; sets the entropy and charge density normalizations used in the phase diagram.
  • Energy scale Lambda_psi = 1058.83 MeV
    Used to convert numerical coordinates to physical MeV units in Eq. (31); the reported critical point coordinates depend on this scale.
  • Sampling cutoff Phi_1^cutoff = around mu_B = 1200 MeV
    A hand-chosen computational cutoff in Sec. III A to avoid oversampling; it bounds the plotted phase diagram but is not intended to affect the transition lines.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary maps bulk black hole thermodynamics to boundary QCD-like quantities (T, s, mu_B, rho_B).
    Invoked throughout Secs. II-IV; standard holographic correspondence, not proved here.
  • domain assumption The improved EMD action (1)-(3) with the parameter values from [55] adequately captures the QCD phase structure of interest.
    Central model input; the parameters were fitted to lattice QCD at mu_B=0, and their validity at large chemical potential is assumed.
  • domain assumption The static, translationally invariant ansatz (7)-(9) with gauge B=0 contains all relevant black hole solutions.
    Invoked before Eq. (7); possible inhomogeneous or time-dependent bulk phases are not considered.
  • domain assumption Numerical shooting from the horizon with r_start=1e-8 and r_end=10 produces converged solutions and valid asymptotic extractions.
    The numerical procedure in Sec. III A is plausible but no convergence or consistency checks are reported.
  • standard math The free energy relation F = -P and dF = s dT at fixed mu_B, Eq. (37), is sufficient to construct phase coexistence and Ehrenfest transition order.
    Used in Sec. IV B as the basis for identifying first- and third-order transitions; the paper does not compute F from an on-shell action.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Critical Point on the Hairy Black Hole Phase Boundary in the Improved Holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CGN63L3C

@misc{pith2026250903947,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Critical Point on the Hairy Black Hole Phase Boundary in the Improved Holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CGN63L3C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03947}
}
abstract

In this work, we investigate the hairy black hole solutions and their dual phase diagram in the improved holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) model.From the gravitational perspective, the rich phase structures observed in the dual boundary field theory originate from the intricate interplay between the scalar field formalism and the Maxwell field coupling mechanism. Two distinct types of hairy black hole solutions are found in this framework. Type-I hairy black holes are predominantly governed by scalar potential dynamics, whereas Type-II solutions emerge through nonminimal coupling to the $U(1)$ gauge field. We map out the phase distribution in the $(\mu_B,T)$ parameter plane and delineate the boundary separating these two hairy phases. The phase diagram exhibits a first-order phase transition line consistent with previous findings, accompanied by a subtle third-order phase transition line that terminates at a critical point positioned at the turning point of the entire phase boundary curve. Our results complement existing research on holographic EMD theory by offering a comprehensive characterization of phase distributions, transition boundaries, and their gravitational sector interpretations. These insights will enable more effective engineering of specific phase structures for simulating strongly coupled systems through targeted modifications to the EMD model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03947 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: Existence domain of the hairy black holes in the parameter space of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A typical example of the profiles of the field functions corresponding to Type II hairy black hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature as a function of the scalar hair [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The radial profiles for scalar field with di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The phase diagram of these two hairy phases in parameter space of (µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The Gibbs free energy density with respect to temperature for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The entropy density with respect to temperature for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The first-order derivative of the entropy density with respect to temperature for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The second derivative of the entropy density with respect to temperature for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    The underlying black hole phase transitions in an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model with a holographic critical point

    H. Guo, X.-M. Kuang and W.-L. Qian, The underlying black hole phase transitions in an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model with a holographic critical point, 2410.05065

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Bzdak, S

    A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V . Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov and N. Xu,Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan, Phys. Rept. 853 (2020) 1–87, [1906.00936]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68 (2018) 339–376, [1802.04801]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [3]

    Lovato et al., Long Range Plan: Dense matter theory for heavy-ion collisions and neutron stars, 2211.02224

    A. Lovato et al., Long Range Plan: Dense matter theory for heavy-ion collisions and neutron stars, 2211.02224

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun

    W.-j. Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74 (2022) 097304, [2205.00468]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    J. N. Guenther, Overview of the QCD phase diagram: Recent progress from the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021) 136, [2010.15503]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    L. Du, A. Sorensen and M. Stephanov, The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: A theory overview, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33 (2024) 2430008, [2402.10183]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    X. Luo, S. Shi, N. Xu and Y . Zhang, A Study of the Properties of the QCD Phase Diagram in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions, Particles 3 (2020) 278–307, [2004.00789]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

Show all 71 references
  1. [8]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and G. Servant, Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028, [1004.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Boeckel and J

    T. Boeckel and J. Scha ffner-Bielich, A little inflation at the cosmological QCD phase transition, 21 Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 103506, [1105.0832]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001, [1512.06239]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Pasechnik, M

    R. Pasechnik, M. Reichert, F. Sannino and Z.-W. Wang, Gravitational waves from composite dark sectors, JHEP 02 (2024) 159, [2309.16755]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black hole production during first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L021303, [2106.05637]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Shao and M

    J. Shao and M. Huang, Gravitational waves and primordial black holes from chirality imbalanced QCD first-order phase transition with P and CP violation, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 043011, [2209.13809]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal and E. V . Shuryak,Signatures of the tricritical point in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4816–4819, [hep-ph/9806219]

    1998 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Adamczyk et al., Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys

    STAR collaboration, L. Adamczyk et al., Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 044904, [1701.07065]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Senger, Exploring terra incognita in the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter—experiments at FAIR and NICA, Phys

    P. Senger, Exploring terra incognita in the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter—experiments at FAIR and NICA, Phys. Scripta 97 (2022) 064003, [2204.01056]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Aoki et al., Extension of the J-PARC Hadron Experimental Facility: Third White Paper, 2110.04462

    K. Aoki et al., Extension of the J-PARC Hadron Experimental Facility: Third White Paper, 2110.04462

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann et al., The QCD thermal phase transition in the presence of a small chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 074507, [hep-lat/0204010]

    2002 arXiv

  12. [19]

    C. R. Allton, M. Doring, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch et al., Thermodynamics of two flavor QCD to sixth order in quark chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 054508, [hep-lat/0501030]

    2005 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Bazavov et al., The QCD Equation of State toO(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD, Phys

    A. Bazavov et al., The QCD Equation of State toO(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054504, [1701.04325]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Borsányi, Z

    S. Borsányi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto et al., Lattice QCD equation of state at finite chemical potential from an alternative expansion scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 232001, [2102.06660]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic 22 physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33 (1994) 477–575, [hep-ph/9403224]

    1994 arXiv

  16. [23]

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, H. Chen, Y .-x. Liu and C. D. Roberts, Phase diagram and critical endpoint for strongly-interacting quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 172301, [1011.2876]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Shi, Y .-L

    C. Shi, Y .-L. Wang, Y . Jiang, Z.-F. Cui and H.-S. Zong,Locate QCD Critical End Point in a Continuum Model Study, JHEP 07 (2014) 014, [1403.3797]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Gao and Y .-x

    F. Gao and Y .-x. Liu,QCD phase transitions via a refined truncation of Dyson-Schwinger equations, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 076009, [1607.01675]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, On the phase diagram of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096007, [hep-ph/9804290]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Hatsuda and T

    T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian, Phys. Rept. 247 (1994) 221–367, [hep-ph/9401310]

    1994 arXiv

  21. [28]

    T. M. Schwarz, S. P. Klevansky and G. Papp, The Phase diagram and bulk thermodynamical quantities in the NJL model at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 055205, [nucl-th/9903048]

    1999 arXiv

  22. [29]

    de Forcrand, Simulating QCD at finite density, PoS LA T2009(2009) 010, [1005.0539]

    P. de Forcrand, Simulating QCD at finite density, PoS LA T2009(2009) 010, [1005.0539]

    2009 arXiv

  23. [30]

    H.-T. Ding, F. Karsch and S. Mukherjee, Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24 (2015) 1530007, [1504.05274]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [31]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  25. [32]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

    1998 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Kovtun, D

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Holography and hydrodynamics: Diffusion on stretched horizons, JHEP 10 (2003) 064, [hep-th/0309213]

    2003 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Buchel and J

    A. Buchel and J. T. Liu, Universality of the shear viscosity in supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 090602, [hep-th/0311175]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [36]

    X.-H. Ge, Y . Matsuo, F.-W. Shu, S.-J. Sin and T. Tsukioka,Viscosity Bound, Causality Violation and Instability with Stringy Correction and Charge, JHEP 10 (2008) 009, [0808.2354]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [37]

    S. A. Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224002, [0903.3246]. 23

    2009 arXiv

  31. [38]

    C. P. Herzog, Lectures on Holographic Superfluidity and Superconductivity, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 343001, [0904.1975]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [39]

    R.-G. Cai, L. Li, L.-F. Li and R.-Q. Yang, Introduction to Holographic Superconductor Models, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 58 (2015) 060401, [1502.00437]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Erdmenger, N

    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall, Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review, Eur. Phys. J. A 35 (2008) 81–133, [0711.4467]

    2008 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Casalderrey-Solana, H

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal and U. Achim Wiedemann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions. Cambridge University Press, 2014, 10.1017/9781009403504

    2014 doi

  35. [42]

    S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch and J. Erlich, Light-Front Holographic QCD and Emerging Confinement, Phys. Rept. 584 (2015) 1–105, [1407.8131]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Brambilla et al., QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives, Eur

    N. Brambilla et al., QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2981, [1404.3723]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [44]

    DeWolfe, S

    O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser and C. Rosen, A holographic critical point, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 086005, [1012.1864]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [45]

    DeWolfe, S

    O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser and C. Rosen, Dynamic critical phenomena at a holographic critical point, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 126014, [1108.2029]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [46]

    J. Zhou, X. Chen, Y .-Q. Zhao and J. Ping, Thermodynamics of heavy quarkonium in a magnetic field background, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 086020, [2006.09062]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Rougemont, R

    R. Rougemont, R. Critelli, J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha and C. Ratti, Dynamical versus equilibrium properties of the QCD phase transition: A holographic perspective, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 014032, [1704.05558]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Grefa, M

    J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti et al., Transport coefficients of the quark-gluon plasma at the critical point and across the first-order line, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 034024, [2203.00139]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Rougemont, A

    R. Rougemont, A. Ficnar, S. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Energy loss, equilibration, and thermodynamics of a baryon rich strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma, JHEP 04 (2016) 102, [1507.06556]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Z. Li, D. Li and M. Huang, Signals of critical end point from jet quenching and quark energy loss in holographic QCD, 2504.04147

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    He, S.-Y

    S. He, S.-Y . Wu, Y . Yang and P.-H. Yuan,Phase Structure in a Dynamical Soft-Wall Holographic 24 QCD Model, JHEP 04 (2013) 093, [1301.0385]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Yang and P.-H

    Y . Yang and P.-H. Yuan,A Refined Holographic QCD Model and QCD Phase Structure, JHEP 11 (2014) 149, [1406.1865]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Knaute, R

    J. Knaute, R. Yaresko and B. Kämpfer, Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 419–425, [1702.06731]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Critelli, J

    R. Critelli, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti and R. Rougemont, Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 096026, [1706.00455]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Grefa, J

    J. Grefa, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti and R. Rougemont, Hot and dense quark-gluon plasma thermodynamics from holographic black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 034002, [2102.12042]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and Y .-X. Wang,Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) L121902, [2201.02004]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Z. Li, J. Liang, S. He and L. Li, Holographic study of higher-order baryon number susceptibilities at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 046008, [2305.13874]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Rougemont, J

    R. Rougemont, J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo et al., Hot QCD phase diagram from holographic Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton models, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 (2024) 104093, [2307.03885]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [59]

    S. S. Gubser, Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065034, [0801.2977]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [60]

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, Holographic Superconductors, JHEP 12 (2008) 015, [0810.1563]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [61]

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, Building a Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 031601, [0803.3295]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, C. A. R. Herdeiro, A. M. Pombo, E. Radu and N. Sanchis-Gual, Spontaneous Scalarisation of Charged Black Holes: Coupling Dependence and Dynamical Features, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 134002, [1902.05079]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual and J. A. Font, Spontaneous Scalarization of Charged Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 101102, [1806.05190]. 25

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Hertog and K

    T. Hertog and K. Maeda, Black holes with scalar hair and asymptotics in N = 8 supergravity, JHEP 07 (2004) 051, [hep-th/0404261]

    2004 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Li, R.-G

    H.-F. Li, R.-G. Cai and H.-Q. Zhang, Analytical Studies on Holographic Superconductors in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, JHEP 04 (2011) 028, [1103.2833]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    H. Guo, S. Kiorpelidi, X.-M. Kuang, E. Papantonopoulos, B. Wang and J.-P. Wu, Spontaneous holographic scalarization of black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theories, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 084029, [2006.10659]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Guo, W.-L

    H. Guo, W.-L. Qian and B. Wang, Phase structure of holographic superconductors in an Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory with spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 124038, [2401.09846]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Brihaye, B

    Y . Brihaye, B. Hartmann, N. P. Aprile and J. Urrestilla,Scalarization of asymptotically anti–de Sitter black holes with applications to holographic phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 124016, [1911.01950]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Kanti, N

    P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis and E. Winstanley,Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5049–5058, [hep-th/9511071]

    1996 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Torii, H

    T. Torii, H. Yajima and K.-i. Maeda, Dilatonic black holes with Gauss-Bonnet term, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 739–753, [gr-qc/9606034]. 26

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.