Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 41 references

In-situ profiling of pressure-induced exciton traps in suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Suspended MoS2 monolayers, bent by gas pressure, act as tunable exciton traps whose shape can be read out in situ from reflectance maps.

desk verdict A solid experimental methods paper that combines pressure-tunable exciton traps in suspended MoS2 with an optical in-situ profile readout; the main weakness is the unquantified effect of strain on the dielectric function used in the reflectivity model. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04319 v1 pith:HQLISGWM submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.mes-hall

Leonard Geilen , Lukas Schleicher , Alexander Musta , Benedict Brouwer , Eva M. Weig , Alexander Holleitner , Anne Rodriguez This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords MoS2monolayerexcitontrapsuspendedmembraneFabry-Pérotreflectancepressuretuningin-situprofilingstrainengineeringTMDCoptoelectronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a single atomic layer of MoS2 stretched across a tiny hole in a metal-coated substrate seals off a pocket of gas, so changing the outside pressure bends the membrane into a smooth, lens-like shape. That bend funnels excitons—bound electron-hole pairs—toward the center, creating an exciton trap whose depth and luminescence can be tuned by one global pressure control. The authors also show that the membrane's shape, normally measured with an atomic-force microscope, can instead be read out in situ from optical reflectance maps: light bouncing between the bent monolayer and the reflective hole bottom creates Fabry-Pérot fringes that encode the local height. If this works as claimed, it supplies a scalable, non-invasive way to build and monitor many tunable exciton traps at once, without touching the sample during optical experiments.

What carries the argument

The enabling geometry is a suspended MoS2 monolayer sealing a small volume of gas inside a circular hole in a Si/SiO2 substrate coated with a thin reflective Ti/Au layer. Two quantitative tools carry the argument: (1) the extended Hencky solution for a pressure-loaded circular membrane, which gives the deflection profile and strain distribution; and (2) a transfer-matrix reflectance model using literature dielectric functions for MoS2 and the substrate, which reproduces Fabry-Pérot interference fringes in reflectance contrast maps and yields the local membrane height at each pixel. Together these tools turn a reflectance map into a full in-situ height profile, allow extraction of the interna

What would settle it

Take one suspended monolayer, fix the gas pressure, and measure its shape twice: once with an atomic-force microscope and once by fitting the reflectance model; repeat at several pressures. If the reflectance-derived height profile deviates from the AFM profile by more than the fit uncertainty, particularly at photon energies near the 1.89 eV exciton resonance, the assumption that strain does not affect the light response is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a sealed gas pocket turns a suspended MoS2 monolayer into a pressure-controlled exciton trap. Exfoliated monolayers sitting over circular holes in a metal-coated substrate enclose a small volume of air; a pressure difference between that pocket and the environment bends the membrane into a smooth, roughly spherical-cap shape described quantitatively by the extended Hencky model. Photoluminescence maps show a maximum in emission intensity and a minimum in emission energy at the membrane center, the signature of excitons funnelled into the deepest part of the bend. The main methodological step is an in-situ readout: reflectance contrast spectra, modelled with

Load-bearing premise

The reflectance-based height readout assumes that bending the MoS2 monolayer does not change its optical properties, even though the paper itself notes that strains up to about 0.3% can shift the exciton and trion features in the same spectral range; if that shift is large enough, the extracted trap shapes would be systematically wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hundreds of suspended MoS2 monolayers on one chip can be tuned collectively: one external pressure setting reshapes every sealed membrane at once.
  • The trap shape can be read in real time during optical experiments, because reflectance imaging is non-invasive and does not require an AFM tip.
  • Tuning is reversible: returning the external pressure restores the original photoluminescence intensity pattern and the radius of the central trap.
  • Maximum strains near 0.3% stay below the direct-to-indirect bandgap transition, so the trapped luminescence remains excitonic at the K/K' points.
  • The sealed gas behaves as an ideal gas (p_internal × V_enclosed ≈ constant), so the internal pressure—and hence the trap depth—can be inferred from fits to the Hencky model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reflectance model is sensitive enough, the systematic deviation near the neutral-exciton energy could be inverted into a spatially resolved strain sensor, turning a known nuisance into an extra measurement channel.
  • The same platform could be extended to other TMDC monolayers and to low temperatures, where exciton drift and many-body effects become relevant; the pressure-controlled trap would then provide a clean, contact-free potential landscape.
  • Because the trap sits at the center of a Fabry-Pérot cavity formed by the bent membrane and the metal bottom, a single quantum emitter placed there could be coupled to the cavity mode, enabling quantum transduction—an application the paper gestures toward but does not demonstrate.
  • A direct calibration test—comparing in-situ reflectance profiles against simultaneously acquired AFM topography at the same pressures—would quantify how much strain-induced dielectric changes bias the height extraction; this is not performed in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. Geilen et al. demonstrate a pressure-controlled platform in which suspended MoS2 monolayers, sealed over metallized circular holes, act as exciton traps with PL intensity maximum and emission-energy minimum at the membrane center. The central advance is an in-situ optical readout of the membrane deflection profile: reflectance spectra are fitted with a transfer-matrix model using literature dielectric functions, yielding a local Fabry-Perot cavity height at each position. AFM line-cuts of several membranes are fitted with the extended Hencky model, and reflectance-derived profiles for one 13 um membrane at three external pressures are likewise fitted with the same mechanical model. Reversible pressure tuning of the PL radial structure is also reported. The paper concludes that suspended MoS2 monolayers with enclosed gas volumes trap excitons at their center and that the spatial profile can be read out in-situ from reflectance.

Significance. If the in-situ reflectance method is quantitatively reliable, it offers a scalable, non-invasive route to measuring deflection and strain profiles in suspended TMDC membranes during optical experiments, without requiring AFM. The paper combines a well-established mechanical model (extended Hencky) with an optical interference model and attempts an external benchmark via AFM. The reversible pressure tuning and the large number of simultaneously addressable traps are attractive for future exciton-circuit and strain-engineering studies. However, the central readout currently rests on an unquantified assumption about the dielectric function under inhomogeneous strain, and the AFM validation is performed on different membranes from the one used for the reflectance-based reconstruction. These gaps need to be addressed before the central claim is fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4b/e and surrounding text] The reflectance model uses the dielectric function of unstrained MoS2, while the membranes are strained up to ~0.3% at the center, inhomogeneously. The deviation between model and data near 1.89 eV is tentatively attributed to strain, but this is exactly the photon energy used for the reflectance maps in Fig. 4a/c. Since the phase accumulated in the MoS2 layer enters the Fabry-Perot condition, a strain-dependent dielectric function does not produce a simple global rescaling of the extracted heights; it can distort the reconstructed profile shape. Please quantify the bias by repeating the fit with a strain-shifted dielectric function or by comparing reflectance-derived and AFM-derived profiles on the same membrane at the same pressure. Without such an analysis, the in-situ readout claim is not quantitatively established.
  2. [Fig. 3 vs Fig. 4e] The AFM validation is performed on membranes with diameters of 4-8 um (Fig. 3), whereas the reflectance-based reconstruction is demonstrated on a 13 um membrane (Fig. 4). These are different devices; no same-membrane comparison is provided. The conclusion states that the deduced profiles are 'consistent with line-cuts measured by an atomic force microscope,' but this consistency is not directly demonstrated. Please provide a direct comparison on the same suspended monolayer, or present a clear argument why diameter-dependent differences in strain, cavity order, and edge conditions do not affect the validity of the reflectance-based readout.
  3. [Fig. 4e and Supporting Information] The reconstructed profiles in Fig. 4e are shown without uncertainties, and the text acknowledges that the AFM-derived Young's modulus has 'rather large uncertainty.' The statement that p_int * V_enclosed is constant within a set of experiments with varying p_ext is not supported by a figure or error analysis. Please provide confidence intervals on the extracted heights and on the deduced p_int values, including propagation of the uncertainty in E and of the model fit quality. This is needed to judge the precision and reliability of the in-situ profiling method.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main text] Minor wording inconsistencies: 'read-out' vs 'readout' and 'Fabry-P\'erot' spelling vary. In addition, 'the MoS2 is stacked onto the Ti/Au' would read more clearly as 'the MoS2 is transferred onto the Ti/Au'.
  2. [Fig. 4b caption] The dashed vertical line is described as indicating the luminescence emission energy, but the x-axis of Fig. 4b is photon energy. Clarify whether the line marks the fitted exciton position or the energy used in the maps, and note that this is the energy where the model deviation is largest.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reflectance-based readout is a model inversion with independent Hencky and AFM checks, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. AFM line-cuts are fitted with the extended Hencky model (Fig. 3), giving an independent topographic reference. The reflectance readout (Fig. 4) is obtained by fitting measured reflectance spectra with a transfer-matrix model that uses literature dielectric functions of unstrained MoS2; the fitted quantity is the local cavity height, which is a genuine physical parameter of the Fabry-Perot geometry and is not defined in terms of the claimed output profile. The reconstructed profiles are then again fitted by the extended Hencky model, providing a non-trivial shape check because the height at each pixel is fitted independently. The observed constancy of pint·Venclosed is a physical consistency check for a sealed ideal gas, not a tautology. The paper explicitly states a limitation: the model deviates near 1.89 eV and the authors tentatively attribute it to strain effects on the dielectric function; this is a correctness/calibration risk, not circularity, because the strain-shifted dielectric function is not an input that the height result is constructed from. The single self-citation (Ref. 35, used for the transfer-matrix method and dielectric data) is not load-bearing: the transfer-matrix method is a standard, externally established technique, and the central claim does not reduce to that citation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core claim rests on three fitted or assumed quantities: the height extracted from each reflectance spectrum, the pressure difference obtained from Hencky fits, and the Young's modulus taken from literature which scales the pressure values. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • membrane deflection height h(r) = per-pixel fit values from reflectance spectra (e.g., profiles in Fig. 4e)
    The height at each position is the output of fitting the transfer-matrix reflectance model to measured spectra; it is both the observable and the main fitted quantity of the method.
  • pressure difference Δp = 10-60 mbar from AFM fits; inferred pint for reflectance profiles
    Δp is a free fit parameter in the extended Hencky model used to describe the measured and reconstructed profiles.
  • Young's modulus E = 270 GPa (assumed from refs 37,38)
    The extracted internal pressure pint scales with E; authors acknowledge the value from AFM has large uncertainty and that pint is subject to a scaling with E.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The extended Hencky model describes the pressure-deflection relation of a suspended MoS2 monolayer.
    Used to fit AFM line-cuts (Fig. 3) and reconstructed reflectance profiles (Fig. 4e); assumes clamped circular membrane with uniform pressure and known material elasticity.
  • domain assumption The dielectric function of unstrained MoS2 from literature is a sufficient input for the transfer-matrix reflectance model of the strained suspended membrane.
    Central to the height extraction; the authors note a deviation at the exciton energy and attribute it to strain, indicating the assumption is imperfect at the largest strain region.
  • domain assumption The gas inside the sealed cavity obeys the ideal gas law with constant temperature and particle number.
    Used to interpret the constant product pint·Venclosed as expected for an enclosed ideal gas during pressure changes.
  • domain assumption MoS2 monolayers are impermeable on the timescale of the experiments, so a pressure difference can persist.
    Invoked to explain negative/positive deflections and sealed volumes, citing Bunch et al. (ref 33).
  • domain assumption The strain is below the direct-to-indirect bandgap transition threshold (~0.3% strains), so PL mainly stems from K/K' excitons.
    Used to interpret PL spectra and energy shifts, citing refs 36 and 39.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In-situ profiling of pressure-induced exciton traps in suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HQLISGWM

@misc{pith2026250904319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In-situ profiling of pressure-induced exciton traps in suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HQLISGWM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04319}
}
abstract

We demonstrate the in-situ read-out of the spatial profile of suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers hosted on substrates with nano-structured holes. As the profiles are spatially bent, the suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers act as exciton traps with tunable luminescence intensity and energy. The tunability is realized by controlling the environmental pressure on the monolayers, which allows to control hundreds of suspended MoS$_2$ monolayers on a single substrate. The in-situ read-out is based on Fabry-P\'erot interferences and a model of the corresponding reflectance contrast maps of the investigated monolayers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04319 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a sketches a suspended MoS2 mono￾layer atop a pre-structured substrate, which consist of Si/SiO2 (500 µm/285 nm). Circu￾lar holes are lithographically defined and dry￾etched 2 µm deep into the substrate. Then, the chip is metallized with a thin layer of Ti/Au (2 nm/5 nm). The MoS2 is stacked onto the Ti/Au using the gold-assisted direct exfolia￾tion method with an annealing temperature of 200 ◦C at ambient condition… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Atomic force microscope (AFM) line-cuts (dots) across suspended MoS2 mono￾layers with diameters ranging from 4 µm to 8 µm. Solid lines represent fits with the extended Hencky model for pressure-strained membranes. ers for various excitation powers. We observe that the excitonic photon emission is maximum at the center for all investigated powers, sug￾gesting that most excitons are generated and trapped at the center… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Luminescence profile across a sus￾pended MoS2 monolayer. (a) PL maximum across the center of a suspended MoS2 mono￾layer with a diameter of 13 µm for five equidis￾tant laser powers ranging from 1 µW (gray) to 5 µW (black). Black triangles indicate edges of the suspended part of the MoS2 monolayer. (b) Energy profile of the photon emission as in (a). discussed below. The central intensity maxi￾mum is associated with … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In-situ reflectance characterization and determination of the spatial deflection of suspended MoS2 monolayers. (a) Reflectance contrast map of a suspended MoS2 monolayer with a diameter of 13 µm at a wavelength of 656 nm (Ephoton = 1.89 eV). The external pres￾sure is s…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reproducible tuning of the exciton trap with external pressure pext. (a) PL in￾tensity map of a suspended MoS2 monolayer with diameter of 13 µm at pext = 350 mbar, (b) 400 mbar, and (c) 350 mbar. In each case, the experimental uncertainty is ±30 mbar. (d) Ra￾dial cross…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A.; Leonard, J

    High, A. A.; Leonard, J. R.; Remeika, M.; Butov, L. V.; Hanson, M.; Gossard, A. C. Condensation of Excitons in a Trap . Nano Letters 2012, 12, 2605--2609

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    J.; Repp, J.; Schubert, E.; Rai, A

    Schinner, G. J.; Repp, J.; Schubert, E.; Rai, A. K.; Reuter, D.; Wieck, A. D.; Govorov, A. O.; Holleitner, A. W.; Kotthaus, J. P. Confinement and Interaction of Single Indirect Excitons in a Voltage - Controlled Trap Formed Inside Double InGaAs Quantum Wells . Physical Review Letters 2013, 110, 127403

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Optically programmable excitonic traps

    Alloing, M.; Lemaître, A.; Galopin, E.; Dubin, F. Optically programmable excitonic traps. Scientific Reports 2013, 3, 1578

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Dark High Density Dipolar Liquid of Excitons

    Cohen, K.; Shilo, Y.; West, K.; Pfeiffer, L.; Rapaport, R. Dark High Density Dipolar Liquid of Excitons . Nano Letters 2016, 16, 3726--3731

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Bose– Einstein condensation and indirect excitons: a review

    Combescot, M.; Combescot, R.; Dubin, F. Bose– Einstein condensation and indirect excitons: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 2017, 80, 066501

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    N.; Mahdikhanysarvejahany, F.; Muccianti, C.; Alfrey, A.; Koehler, M

    Shanks, D. N.; Mahdikhanysarvejahany, F.; Muccianti, C.; Alfrey, A.; Koehler, M. R.; Mandrus, D. G.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Yu, H.; LeRoy, B. J.; Schaibley, J. R. Nanoscale Trapping of Interlayer Excitons in a 2D Semiconductor Heterostructure . Nano Letters 2021, 21, 5641--5647

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    J.; Kroner, M.; Murthy, P

    Thureja, D.; Imamoglu, A.; Smoleński, T.; Amelio, I.; Popert, A.; Chervy, T.; Lu, X.; Liu, S.; Barmak, K.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Norris, D. J.; Kroner, M.; Murthy, P. A. Electrically tunable quantum confinement of neutral excitons. Nature 2022, 606, 298--304

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    W.; Knorr, A

    Katzer, M.; Selig, M.; Sigl, L.; Troue, M.; Figueiredo, J.; Kiemle, J.; Sigger, F.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A. W.; Knorr, A. Exciton-phonon scattering: Competition between the bosonic and fermionic nature of bound electron-hole pairs. Physical Review B 2023, 108, L121102

    work page 2023

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Kumar, A. M. et al. Strain fingerprinting of exciton valley character in 2D semiconductors. Nature Communications 2024, 15, 7546

    2024

  2. [10]

    Y.; Mier Valvidia, A

    Joe, A. Y.; Mier Valvidia, A. M.; Jauregui, L. A.; Pistunova, K.; Ding, Y., Dapeng Zhou; Scuri, G.; De Greve, K.; Sushko, A.; Kim, B.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Hone, J. C.; Lukin, M. D.; Park, H.; Kim, P. Controlled interlayer exciton ionization in an electrostatic trap in...

    2024

  3. [11]

    Bose- Einstein Condensation of Microcavity Polaritons in a Trap

    Balili, R.; Hartwell, V.; Snoke, D.; Pfeiffer, L.; West, K. Bose- Einstein Condensation of Microcavity Polaritons in a Trap . Science 2007, 316, 1007--1010

    2007

  4. [12]

    D.; Kamp, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ostrovskaya, E

    Schneider, C.; Winkler, K.; Fraser, M. D.; Kamp, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ostrovskaya, E. A.; Höfling, S. Exciton-polariton trapping and potential landscape engineering. Reports on Progress in Physics 2016, 80, 016503

    2016

  5. [13]

    Electric-field-induced exciton transport in coupled quantum well structures

    Hagn, M.; Zrenner, A.; Böhm, G.; Weimann, G. Electric-field-induced exciton transport in coupled quantum well structures. Applied Physics Letters 1995, 67, 232--234

    1995

  6. [14]

    V.; Gossard, A

    Butov, L. V.; Gossard, A. C.; Chemla, D. S. Macroscopically ordered state in an exciton system. Nature 2002, 418, 751--754

    2002

  7. [15]

    W.; Pfeiffer, L.; West, K

    Vörös, Z.; Balili, R.; Snoke, D. W.; Pfeiffer, L.; West, K. Long- Distance Diffusion of Excitons in Double Quantum Well Structures . Physical Review Letters 2005, 94, 226401

    2005

  8. [16]

    W.; Kotthaus, J

    Gärtner, A.; Holleitner, A. W.; Kotthaus, J. P.; Schuh, D. Drift mobility of long-living excitons in coupled GaAs quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters 2006, 89, 052108

    2006

  9. [17]

    H.; Choksy, D

    Fowler-Gerace, L. H.; Choksy, D. J.; Butov, L. V. Voltage-controlled long-range propagation of indirect excitons in a van der Waals heterostructure. Physical Review B 2021, 104, 165302

    2021

  10. [18]

    F.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kis, A

    Sun, Z.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Tagarelli, F.; Gonzalez Marin, J. F.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kis, A. Excitonic transport driven by repulsive dipolar interaction in a van der Waals heterostructure. Nature Photonics 2022, 16, 79--85

    2022

  11. [19]

    G.; Kirchhof, J

    Harats, M. G.; Kirchhof, J. N.; Qiao, M.; Greben, K.; Bolotin, K. I. Dynamics and efficient conversion of excitons to trions in non-uniformly strained monolayer WS2 . Nature Photonics 2020, 14, 324--329

    2020

  12. [20]

    H.; Kang, M.; Kim, K

    Lee, H.; Koo, Y.; Choi, J.; Kumar, S.; Lee, H.-T.; Ji, G.; Choi, S. H.; Kang, M.; Kim, K. K.; Park, H.-R.; Choo, H.; Park, K.-D. Drift-dominant exciton funneling and trion conversion in 2D semiconductors on the nanogap. Science Advances 2022, 8, eabm5236

    2022

  13. [21]

    J.; Schubert, E.; Stallhofer, M

    Schinner, G. J.; Schubert, E.; Stallhofer, M. P.; Kotthaus, J. P.; Schuh, D.; Rai, A. K.; Reuter, D.; Wieck, A. D.; Govorov, A. O. Electrostatically trapping indirect excitons in coupled In x Ga 1 - x As quantum wells. Physical Review B 2011, 83, 165308

    2011

  14. [22]

    W.; Wuenschell, J

    Sinclair, N. W.; Wuenschell, J. K.; Vörös, Z.; Nelsen, B.; Snoke, D. W.; Szymanska, M. H.; Chin, A.; Keeling, J.; Pfeiffer, L. N.; West, K. W. Strain-induced darkening of trapped excitons in coupled quantum wells at low temperature. Physical Review B 2011, 83, 245304

    2011

  15. [23]

    Branny, A.; Kumar, S.; Proux, R.; Gerardot, B. D. Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconductor. Nature Communications 2017, 8, 15053

    2017

  16. [24]

    Evidence of the direct-to-indirect band gap transition in strained two-dimensional WS_ 2 , MoS_ 2 , and WSe_ 2

    Blundo, E.; Felici, M.; Yildirim, T.; Pettinari, G.; Tedeschi, D.; Miriametro, A.; Liu, B.; Ma, W.; Lu, Y.; Polimeni, A. Evidence of the direct-to-indirect band gap transition in strained two-dimensional WS_ 2 , MoS_ 2 , and WSe_ 2 . Physical Review Research 2020, 2, 012024

    2020

  17. [25]

    I.; Banerjee, K.; Moody, G

    Parto, K.; Azzam, S. I.; Banerjee, K.; Moody, G. Defect and strain engineering of monolayer WSe2 enables site-controlled single-photon emission up to 150 K . Nature Communications 2021, 12, 3585

    2021

  18. [26]

    A.; Schneider, R.; Michaelis de Vasconcellos, S.; Bratschitsch, R.; Malic, E

    Rosati, R.; Schmidt, R.; Brem, S.; Perea-Causín, R.; Niehues, I.; Kern, J.; Preuß, J. A.; Schneider, R.; Michaelis de Vasconcellos, S.; Bratschitsch, R.; Malic, E. Dark exciton anti-funneling in atomically thin semiconductors. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 7221

    2021

  19. [27]

    W.; Cantley, L.; Wadehra, A.; Kim, B

    Lloyd, D.; Liu, X.; Christopher, J. W.; Cantley, L.; Wadehra, A.; Kim, B. L.; Goldberg, B. B.; Swan, A. K.; Bunch, J. S. Band Gap Engineering with Ultralarge Biaxial Strains in Suspended Monolayer MoS _ 2 . Nano Letters 2016, 16, 5836--5841

    2016

  20. [28]

    Extended Hencky solution for the blister test of nanomembrane

    Ma, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, Y.; Long, D.; Guan, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Z. Extended Hencky solution for the blister test of nanomembrane. Extreme Mechanics Letters 2018, 22, 69--78

    2018

  21. [29]

    Velický, M. et al. Mechanism of Gold-Assisted Exfoliation of Centimeter-Sized Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 10463--10472

    2018

  22. [30]

    K.; Jacobs-Gedrim, R

    Chow, P. K.; Jacobs-Gedrim, R. B.; Gao, J.; Lu, T.-M.; Yu, B.; Terrones, H.; Koratkar, N. Defect- Induced Photoluminescence in Monolayer Semiconducting Transition Metal Dichalcogenides . ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1520--1527

    2015

  23. [31]

    J.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A

    Klein, J.; Kuc, A.; Nolinder, A.; Altzschner, M.; Wierzbowski, J.; Sigger, F.; Kreupl, F.; Finley, J. J.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A. W.; Kaniber, M. Robust valley polarization of helium ion modified atomically thin MoS2. 2D Materials 2017, 5, 011007

    2017

  24. [32]

    F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T

    Mak, K. F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Atomically Thin MoS 2 : A New Direct - Gap Semiconductor . Physical Review Letters 2010, 105, 136805

    2010

  25. [33]

    S.; Verbridge, S

    Bunch, J. S.; Verbridge, S. S.; Alden, J. S.; van der Zande, A. M.; Parpia, J. M.; Craighead, H. G.; McEuen, P. L. Impermeable Atomic Membranes from Graphene Sheets . Nano Letters 2008, 8, 2458--2462

    2008

  26. [34]

    Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation

    Liu, K.; Feng, J.; Kis, A.; Radenovic, A. Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 2504--2511

    2014

  27. [35]

    D.; Knorr, A.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A

    Sigl, L.; Troue, M.; Katzer, M.; Selig, M.; Sigger, F.; Kiemle, J.; Brotons-Gisbert, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Gerardot, B. D.; Knorr, A.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A. W. Optical dipole orientation of interlayer excitons in MoSe _ 2 - WSe _ 2 heterostacks. Phys. Rev. ...

    2022

  28. [36]

    J.; Wang, B.; Ziegler, J

    Conley, H. J.; Wang, B.; Ziegler, J. I.; Haglund, R. F. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Bolotin, K. I. Bandgap Engineering of Strained Monolayer and Bilayer MoS2. Nano Letters 2013, 13, 3626--3630

    2013

  29. [37]

    Mapping the elastic properties of two-dimensional MoS2 via bimodal atomic force microscopy and finite element simulation

    Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Gan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Yu, J.; Ou, Y.; Zou, D.-F.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Jia, T.; Luo, Q.; Yu, X.-F.; Zhao, H.; Gao, C.-F.; Li, J. Mapping the elastic properties of two-dimensional MoS2 via bimodal atomic force microscopy and finite element simulation. npj Computat...

    2018

  30. [38]

    Stretching and Breaking of Ultrathin MoS2

    Bertolazzi, S.; Brivio, J.; Kis, A. Stretching and Breaking of Ultrathin MoS2 . ACS Nano 2011, 5, 9703--9709

    2011

  31. [39]

    Evidence of the direct-to-indirect band gap transition in strained two-dimensional WS_ 2 , MoS_ 2 , and WSe_ 2

    Blundo, E.; Felici, M.; Yildirim, T.; Pettinari, G.; Tedeschi, D.; Miriametro, A.; Liu, B.; Ma, W.; Lu, Y.; Polimeni, A. Evidence of the direct-to-indirect band gap transition in strained two-dimensional WS_ 2 , MoS_ 2 , and WSe_ 2 . Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 012024

    2020

  32. [40]

    S.; Noh, G.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.-H

    Kim, H.; Moon, J. S.; Noh, G.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.-H. Position and Frequency Control of Strain - Induced Quantum Emitters in WSe _ 2 Monolayers . Nano Letters 2019, 19, 7534--7539

    2019

  33. [41]

    High- Speed Quantum Transducer with a Single - Photon Emitter in a 2D Resonator

    Gao, X.; Yin, Z.-Q.; Li, T. High- Speed Quantum Transducer with a Single - Photon Emitter in a 2D Resonator . Annalen der Physik 2020, 532, 2000233 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000012211515052056701011227 0ustar rootroot [journal=nalefd,manuscript=letter,...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.