Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Do null defects dream of conformal symmetry?

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Maximally symmetric null line defects in d>2 are kinematically trivial: Ward identities force one-point functions to vanish and reduce two-point functions to the standard conformal form times a side-of-plane tariff function.

desk verdict Solid kinematic core in the null-defect algebra and Ward identities; the ultraboosted gauge-potential resolution rests on a test-function space chosen to make it work. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04578 v1 pith:H5TURQFW submitted 2025-09-04 hep-th hep-phmath-phmath.MP

Rajeev S. Erramilli , Justin Kulp , Fedor K. Popov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-phmath-phmath.MP PACS 11.25.Hf
keywords nulllinedefectsLorentzianconformalfieldtheoryWardidentitiesshockwavesultraboostedlimitsWilsonlinesSchrödingersymmetrydistributionaltestfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper initiates the study of null (lightlike) line defects in Lorentzian conformal field theories. Its central claim is that conformal symmetry, especially maximal conformal symmetry, makes such defects kinematically almost trivial: in dimensions d>2, Ward identities force one-point functions of non-identity operators to vanish and reduce two-point functions to the standard conformal form multiplied by an undetermined tariff function that only records which side of the shockwave plane each operator lies on. The paper also shows that null lines preserve a larger algebra than timelike or spacelike lines, connects the resulting null-defect algebra to Schrödinger symmetry, and argues that shockwave-type solutions are generic. Along the way it introduces a restricted space of test functions for null-defect correlators and uses it to resolve a long-standing problem with the ultraboosted limit of the gauge potential of a massless charge in classical electrodynamics. If correct, the result means that maximally symmetric null defects are invisible to local bulk correlations except as jumps across a null plane.

What carries the argument

The central object is the null-defect algebra $\mathfrak{nd} = (\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R})\times \mathbb{R}\times \mathfrak{so}(d-2)) \ltimes \mathfrak{h}_{d-2}$, the maximal subalgebra of the conformal group that preserves a null line placed at $x^+=0$, $x_\perp=0$. It combines the one-dimensional conformal algebra acting along the line, a chiral scaling generator, transverse rotations, and a Heisenberg algebra built from transverse lightcone boosts and special conformal transformations, giving it a Schrödinger-like structure. The load-bearing mechanism is the system of conformal Ward identities for this algebra, solved directly for one- and two-point functions, and supplemented in the scalar and Wilson-line examples by distributional analysis on the restricted test-function space $S_{\mathrm{null}}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, defined so that $c\,\delta(x^+)$ vanishes distributionally and the space is invariant under the null-defect algebra generators.

What would settle it

Compute, in a concrete solvable Lorentzian CFT with a maximally symmetric null defect, the two-point function of two identical scalars on the same side of the shockwave plane; maximal symmetry plus the OPE predicts it vanishes (tariff $t(++,++) = 0$), so a nonzero value would falsify the kinematic claim. Alternatively, integrate the causal free-scalar solution against a Schwartz test function whose integral over $x^+=0$ is nonzero; if the smeared result is nonzero, the restricted test-function space $S_{\mathrm{null}}$ is not the correct distributional setting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a null line defect with maximal conformal symmetry in d>2 leaves bulk kinematics essentially untouched. Solving the conformal Ward identities for the null-defect algebra forces all one-point functions of non-identity primaries to vanish, while two-point functions are constrained to the form $\delta_{\Delta_1,\Delta_2}\, t(s_1,s_2)\, |x_1-x_2|^{-2\Delta_1}$, where $t(s_1,s_2)$ is an undetermined tariff function depending only on whether each operator lies before, after, or on the shockwave plane $x^+=0$. The paper further shows that, in free-field examples, causal and acausal one-point functions coincide whenever the relevant light-ray integral annihilates the vacuum, forcing solutions to be shockwaves supported on $x^+=0$. Finally, by treating null-defect correlators as distributions on a restricted space of Schwartz test functions $S_{\mathrm{null}}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, the paper gives a distributional meaning to ultraboosted gauge potentials that previously failed to converge, thereby resolving a known problem in classical electromagnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on treating null-defect correlation functions as distributions on a restricted space of test functions $S_{\mathrm{null}}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, chosen so that $c\,\delta(x^+)$ vanishes distributionally; if the physical principle selecting that space is rejected, the symmetry restoration of shockwave solutions and the resolution of the ultraboosted gauge-potential problem do not follow, although the pure Ward-identity constraints survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In d>2, a maximally symmetric null line defect cannot be detected by any one-point function of a non-identity scalar, vector, or spinning primary; the only surviving signature is a discontinuity across the $x^+=0$ shockwave plane.
  • Bulk two-point functions in the presence of such a defect are forced into the standard conformal form $|x_1-x_2|^{-2\Delta}$ multiplied by a tariff function $t(s_1,s_2)$, so in maximally symmetric cases all defect physics is contained in that discrete side-of-plane factor.
  • Free-field null-defect one-point functions, causal and acausal, coincide whenever the corresponding light-ray integral annihilates the vacuum, which forces solutions to be shockwaves supported on $x^+=0$.
  • The null Wilson line is the pinning field that preserves the full null-defect algebra at the level of the classical action; its field-strength one-point function is $(g/2\pi)\, x_i/|x_\perp|^2\, \delta(x^+)$, and the same object produces the perfect null polygon on the Lorentzian cylinder.
  • Ultraboosted limits of timelike and spacelike conformal defects reproduce the null results only when the couplings are rescaled and the limiting potentials are treated as distributions on $S_{\mathrm{null}}$; in particular the ultraboosted gauge potential carries no arbitrary scale dependence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the kinematic triviality theorem holds, then classifying maximally symmetric null defects in d>2 reduces to classifying possible tariff functions $t(s_1,s_2)$ and shockwave discontinuities, a much smaller data set than the full defect OPE data of timelike lines.
  • A natural extension the paper does not make is that the restricted test-function technology is likely needed for other lightlike observables, such as integrated null-energy or light-ray operators, whenever a $\delta(x^+)$ contact term would otherwise introduce an arbitrary scale.
  • In (1+1)d, where the null-defect algebra reduces to $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R})\times \{\bar J_0,\bar J_1\}$, the Ward-identity logic implies that only anti-chiral operators can have nontrivial one-point functions; a complete classification would require choosing a positivity condition on $\bar J_0$, which the paper deliberately leaves open.
  • A testable quantitative version in $4-\epsilon$ dimensions is the resummed interacting pinning-field one-point function, which flows to $1/\sqrt{-\lambda_* x^2}$, meaning the field only sees the start of the defect; a numerical or lattice check of this fixed point would test whether the null limit preserves the predicted behavior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper initiates a systematic study of null line defects in Lorentzian CFTs. It shows that a null line preserves a larger subalgebra nd of the conformal group than timelike or spacelike lines, relates this algebra to the Schrödinger algebra, and uses conformal Ward identities to constrain defect correlation functions. The main kinematic result is that maximally symmetric null defects are extremely restrictive: one-point functions of non-identity scalars must vanish, and two-point functions reduce to the standard CFT form times an undetermined 'tariff function' that depends only on which side of the shockwave plane the operators lie. The paper then analyzes explicit examples—a free scalar pinning field and a null Wilson line in (3+1)d—and introduces a restricted test-function space S_null(R^d) on which δ(x+) is distributionally zero. This space is used to argue that spurious scales such as μ² in ultraboosted gauge potentials are absent and that symmetries broken by shockwave solutions are restored. Additional sections treat semi-infinite defects in 4−ε dimensions, defects on the Lorentzian cylinder, the 'perfect null polygon', and a classification of (1+1)d null-defect representations.

Significance. The kinematic constraints derived from Ward identities are a useful and non-obvious contribution: they show that the enhanced symmetry of null defects makes maximally symmetric null defects almost kinematically trivial, in contrast to timelike or spacelike defects. The connection to Schrödinger/Lifshitz symmetry is insightful and likely to be of independent interest. The explicit computations of ultraboosted limits are carefully presented and the paper provides a concrete proposal for resolving the long-standing problem of ultraboosted gauge potentials. However, the most novel technical device—the restricted test-function space S_null—is introduced by imposing the very symmetry invariance that it is then used to prove, and the distributional calculus is not fully specified. The paper is exploratory and would benefit from a clearer separation between rigorous kinematic results and conjectural distributional framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3.1, Eq. (3.56)] The definition S_null(R4) = S0(R4)^{n4} is made by imposing invariance under the null-defect algebra, which includes demanding that δ(x+) transforms to zero under Ki and K+ as in (3.53) and (3.55). Consequently, the claims that the log μ² term in (3.104) carries no scale and that the D, Ki, K+ Ward identities are restored are consequences of the chosen test-function space rather than independent results. The paper should either derive S_null from an independent physical principle beyond the convergence requirement of (3.43)–(3.46), or explicitly state that the resolution is a convention about allowed probes.
  2. [Section 3.6.2, Eqs. (3.107) and (3.114)] The Feynman-propagator solution A−1,s is said to be a distribution on S_null, where it is zero, yet the field strength F+i is extracted from it as a nonzero distribution on S(R4). The paper does not provide a consistent distributional calculus for how differentiation acts on S_null and why F is not evaluated on S_null. Without such a calculus, the joint claims that A has no μ-dependence and that F is physical are not self-consistent.
  3. [Section 3.2.2, after Eq. (3.31)] The conclusion that t(±1,±1)=0 and that maximally symmetric null defects are 'nearly trivial' rests on an OPE heuristic that same-side operators reduce to local operators whose one-point functions vanish. This is presented as an expectation rather than a proven statement; since it is used to argue that all nontrivial defect physics is encoded in the tariff function, it should be supported by an explicit argument or the claim should be correspondingly weakened.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1, page 2] There is a typo in the sentence 'the reconstruction of physically interesting real-time observables from Euclidean correlation functions is not guaranteed to beeasy.'
  2. [Section 3.3.1] The notation S0(R4) = 'ker(δ(x+))' is explicitly said to be 'not actually well-defined'; a precise definition of S0 in terms of the vanishing of the relevant integral would be clearer.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.37)] The quantity 'x+' in scare quotes is introduced in the solution formula; defining it in a separate display or table before use would improve readability.
  4. [References] Reference [84] is to unpublished notes and reference [75] is a placeholder 'To appear' with no arXiv identifier; these should be updated or removed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The restricted test-function space S_null is defined by requiring δ(x+) and its K_i/K_+ transforms to vanish; several advertised outputs (no μ² scale, restored symmetries, ultraboosted-potential resolution) follow from that definition by construction, while the Ward-identity core is self-contained.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.3.1, eq. (3.56)]
    "A straightforward analysis shows that the space is invariant under all transformations except Ki and K+. ... Enforcing K+ invariance by making all of these conditions distibutionally zero defines our space of null-defect test-functions. We can write this schematically as: Snull(R4) :=S0(R4)n4."

    Snull is constructed by requiring that the nd-transforms of δ(x+)—e.g. Ki : δ(x+)→xi(γ−1)δ(x+) and the finite K+ transform (3.55)—are distributionally zero. The later claims in §3.3.3 and §3.6.1 that [D,φc] and related variations vanish, that μ d/dμ φs = (h/2π)δ(x+) is zero, and that no scale is introduced are immediate consequences of this defining condition. The space is not derived from an independent principle that would make these symmetry-restoration statements nontrivial outputs.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.6.1, text below eq. (3.104)]
    "But, as explained in Section 3.3.1, null defects demand a smaller space of test functions Snull(R4), so that the limiting gauge potential A−1 is a distribution in S′null(R4). Thus, we claim that A−1 has no arbitrary scale dependence on µ2."

    The μ² dependence in (3.104) resides entirely in the term gF²/(2π) log(μ²x⊥²) δ(x+). Since Snull was defined precisely so that cδ(x+) vanishes distributionally, the removal of the μ² scale is the defining property of Snull applied to the log term, not a new result of the ultraboost limit. The advertised 'resolution' of the longstanding gauge-potential problem is therefore carried by the chosen test-function space rather than by an independent calculation of the limit.

full rationale

The bulk of the paper is a self-contained kinematic analysis: Section 2 and Section 3.2 solve conformal Ward identities, forcing one-point functions to vanish or be contact terms and reducing two-point functions to the standard form (3.31) with an explicitly undetermined tariff function t(s1,s2). That derivation does not borrow any fitted input or load-bearing self-citation, so the paper's main claim that maximal conformal symmetry nearly trivializes null-defect kinematics is not circular. The circularity is localized to the construction of Snull: in eq. (3.56) the space is defined by imposing that δ(x+) and its Ki/K+ transforms vanish distributionally, and the later statements that shockwave solutions introduce no scale, that [D,φc] and related variations are zero on Snull, and that the ultraboosted gauge potential A−1 has no μ² dependence all follow immediately from that definition. The initial S0⊂S condition does have an independent convergence motivation around (3.43)-(3.47), but the full nd-invariance conditions are imposed to force the answer, making the ultraboosted-potential resolution partly conventional. No significant self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem was found; the paper is also honest that t(±1,±1)=0 is an OPE-based expectation rather than a Ward-identity output. Overall, the definitional outputs affect an advertised resolution but not the pure Ward-identity core, giving a moderate circularity score of 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central constraints come from standard conformal Ward identities, but the resolution of the gauge potential problem and some symmetry statements rely on the authors' new S_null test-function space. No parameters are fitted to data; the only floating scale µ is declared unobservable on S_null. The inventoried entity is the S_null space itself.

free parameters (1)
  • Scale µ in shockwave solutions = undetermined
    Appears in G_F^(2)(x⊥) = (1/4π) log(µ²x⊥²) in Eq. (1.2) and (3.48), introduced as an integration constant; the paper argues it is distributionally zero on S_null, so it is not a physical fitted parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Conformal Ward identities are valid differential constraints on defect correlation functions.
    Used throughout Section 3.2 and Appendix B.4 to constrain one- and two-point functions.
  • domain assumption The infinite null defect is defined by a constant density integral along the ray with vanishing boundary terms.
    Section 3.1 assumes the defect is infinite and boundary terms are dropped; finite and semi-infinite cases are treated separately in Section 4.
  • ad hoc to paper S_null(R^d) is the correct test-function space for null defect correlators.
    Introduced in Section 3.3.1; the physical necessity is asserted to prevent divergences and restore symmetries.
  • domain assumption Light-ray operators annihilate the vacuum for ∆+J>1.
    Used in Section 3.5 to argue causal and acausal solutions coincide up to shockwave terms, citing Kravchuk and Simmons-Duffin [20].
  • domain assumption OPE reduction on one side of the shockwave plane gives t(±1,±1)=0.
    Section 3.2.2 uses this to argue two-point functions vanish when both operators are on the same side; the text hedges with 'we expect'.
  • standard math Representations of the ax+b group classify defect local operators in (1+1)d.
    Section 5.1 uses standard harmonic analysis results for H.
invented entities (1)
  • Restricted test function space S_null(R^d)
    purpose: To define null defect correlators so that δ(x+) terms vanish, removing divergences and artificial scales.
    Introduced in Section 3.3.1; it is a mathematical device with no external falsifiable handle, and the claim that physical consistency compels it is an assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Do null defects dream of conformal symmetry?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5TURQFW

@misc{pith2026250904578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Do null defects dream of conformal symmetry?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5TURQFW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04578}
}
abstract

We initiate the study of null line defects in Lorentzian conformal field theories in various dimensions. We show that null lines geometrically preserve a larger set of conformal isometries than their timelike and spacelike counterparts, explain a connection to non-relativistic systems, and constrain correlation functions using conformal Ward identities. We argue that having conformal symmetry, and especially maximal conformal symmetry, is extremely constraining -- nearly trivializing systems. We consider the (3+1)d scalar pinning field and null Wilson line examples in depth, compare their results to ultraboosted limits of timelike and spacelike systems, and argue that shockwave-type solutions are generic. A number of physical consistency conditions compel us to consider defect correlators as distributions on a restricted subspace of Schwartz test functions. Consequently, we provide a resolution to the longstanding problem of ultraboosted limits of gauge potentials in classical electromagnetism. We briefly analyze semi-infinite sources for the scalar in ($4-\epsilon$)-dimensions, consider solutions on the Lorentzian cylinder, and introduce the ''perfect null polygon'' which emerges for compatibility between Gauss' law and ultraboosted limits.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Infinite Symmetry Algebras in Four-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Universal light-ray operators from the stress tensor generate the wedge subalgebra of w_{1+∞} in generic interacting 4D CFTs, with finite one-point functions matching the full tower of soft graviton and gluon factors.

  2. Revisiting Schr\"odinger CFTs: Factorization, Massless Particles, and a Path to the Bootstrap

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Schrödinger CFTs are reformulated via a harmonic-trap thermofield double, giving a state-operator correspondence for all operators and a factorization proof of non-renormalization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172, [ arXiv:1412.5148]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of Quarks , Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445–2459

    1974

  3. [3]

    A. M. Polyakov, Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe , Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 82–84

    1975

  4. [4]

    ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement , Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1–25

    1978

  5. [5]

    X. G. Wen, Topological Order in Rigid States, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4 (1990) 239

    1990

  6. [6]

    Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S-duality , Phys

    A. Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S-duality , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025005, [ hep-th/0501015]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal Invariance and Surface Critical Behavior , Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 514–532

    1984

  8. [8]

    D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 522–576, [ cond-mat/9505127]

    arXiv 1995

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Bill` o, V

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri,Defects in conformal field theory , JHEP 04 (2016) 091, [ arXiv:1601.02883]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and A. Raviv-Moshe, Renormalization Group Flows on Line Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 2 021603, [ arXiv:2108.01117]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s Functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 83–112

    1973

  4. [12]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s Functions. 2. , Commun. Math. Phys. 42 (1975) 281

    1975

  5. [13]

    Glaser, On the equivalence of the Euclidean and Wightman formulation of field theory , Commun

    V. Glaser, On the equivalence of the Euclidean and Wightman formulation of field theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 37 (1974) 257–272

    1974

  6. [14]

    Kravchuk, J

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao, and S. Rychkov, Distributions in CFT. Part I. Cross-ratio space , JHEP 05 (2020) 137, [ arXiv:2001.08778]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Kravchuk, J

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao, and S. Rychkov, Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space , JHEP 08 (2021) 094, [ arXiv:2104.02090]. – 69 –

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dedushenko, Snowmass White Paper: The Quest to Define QFT , arXiv:2203.08053

    M. Dedushenko, Snowmass White Paper: The Quest to Define QFT , arXiv:2203.08053

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    N. B. Agmon and Y. Wang, Classifying Superconformal Defects in Diverse Dimensions Part I: Superconformal Lines, arXiv:2009.06650

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Luscher and G

    M. Luscher and G. Mack, Global Conformal Invariance in Quantum Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 41 (1975) 203–234

    1975

  11. [19]

    Mack, Convergence of Operator Product Expansions on the Vacuum in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory , Commun

    G. Mack, Convergence of Operator Product Expansions on the Vacuum in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 53 (1977) 155

    1977

  12. [20]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray operators in conformal field theory , JHEP 11 (2018) 102, [ arXiv:1805.00098]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Qiao, Classification of Convergent OPE Channels for Lorentzian CFT Four-Point Functions, SciPost Phys

    J. Qiao, Classification of Convergent OPE Channels for Lorentzian CFT Four-Point Functions, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022), no. 4 093, [ arXiv:2005.09105]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Caron-Huot, Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories , JHEP 09 (2017) 078, [arXiv:1703.00278]

    S. Caron-Huot, Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories , JHEP 09 (2017) 078, [arXiv:1703.00278]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Simmons-Duffin, D

    D. Simmons-Duffin, D. Stanford, and E. Witten, A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula , JHEP 07 (2018) 085, [ arXiv:1711.03816]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 104–142

    1985

  17. [25]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Loop Space Formalism and Renormalization Group for the Infrared Asymptotics of QCD , Phys. Lett. B 171 (1986) 459–467

    1986

  18. [26]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 342–364

    1987

  19. [27]

    I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, On lightlike Wilson loops , Phys. Lett. B 287 (1992) 169–175

    1992

  20. [28]

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling , JHEP 06 (2007) 064, [ arXiv:0705.0303]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, A. Sever, and P. Vieira, An Operator Product Expansion for Polygonal null Wilson Loops , JHEP 04 (2011) 088, [ arXiv:1006.2788]

    2011 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Correa, J

    D. Correa, J. Henn, J. Maldacena, and A. Sever, The cusp anomalous dimension at three loops and beyond, JHEP 05 (2012) 098, [ arXiv:1203.1019]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    L. F. Alday, P. Heslop, and J. Sikorowski, Perturbative correlation functions of null Wilson loops and local operators, JHEP 03 (2013) 074, [ arXiv:1207.4316]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. M. Henn and T. Huber, The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in N = 4 super Yang-Mills and analytic integration techniques for Wilson line integrals , JHEP 09 (2013) 147, [arXiv:1304.6418]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    B. Fiol, E. Gerchkovitz, and Z. Komargodski, Exact Bremsstrahlung Function in N = 2 Superconformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 8 081601, [arXiv:1510.01332]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Factorization of hard processes in qcd , 2004. – 70 –

    2004

  27. [35]

    L. F. Alday and R. Roiban, Scattering Amplitudes, Wilson Loops and the String/Gauge Theory Correspondence, Phys. Rept. 468 (2008) 153–211, [ arXiv:0807.1889]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mertens, Wilson loops : mathematical foundations with applications in quantum chromodynamics

    T. Mertens, Wilson loops : mathematical foundations with applications in quantum chromodynamics. PhD thesis, Antwerp U., Antwerp U., 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    Becher, A

    T. Becher, A. Broggio, and A. Ferroglia, Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory , vol. 896. Springer, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    J. L. Cardy, Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula , Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 581–596

    1989

  31. [39]

    J. L. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory , hep-th/0411189

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations , JHEP 05 (2008) 012, [ arXiv:0803.1467]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Meltzer, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Detectors in weakly-coupled field theories, JHEP 04 (2023) 014, [ arXiv:2209.00008]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. J. Gross and S. B. Treiman, Light cone structure of current commutators in the gluon quark model, Phys. Rev. D 4 (1971) 1059–1072

    1971

  35. [43]

    S. A. Anikin and O. I. Zavyalov, Short Distance and Light Cone Expansions for Products of Currents, Annals Phys. 116 (1978) 135–166

    1978

  36. [44]

    I. I. Balitsky and V. M. Braun, Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators , Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 541–584

    1989

  37. [45]

    M¨ uller, D

    D. M¨ uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, and J. Hoˇ rejˇ si,Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD , Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141, [hep-ph/9812448]

    1994 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment , arXiv:2506.09119

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, Light-ray sum rules and the c-anomaly , JHEP 08 (2024) 008, [arXiv:2405.10137]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    P. C. Argyres, M. Lotito, and M. Weaver, Vertex algebra of extended operators in 4d N=2 superconformal field theories. Part I , JHEP 10 (2023) 175, [ arXiv:2211.04410]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Weinberg, Dynamics at infinite momentum , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Dynamics at infinite momentum , Phys. Rev. 150 (1966) 1313–1318

    1966

  42. [50]

    Susskind, Model of selfinduced strong interactions , Phys

    L. Susskind, Model of selfinduced strong interactions , Phys. Rev. 165 (1968) 1535–1546

    1968

  43. [51]

    J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, Quantum Electrodynamics in the Infinite Momentum Frame , Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 2901–2913

    1970

  44. [52]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, E. Katz, L. G. Vitale, and M. T. Walters, Lightcone effective Hamiltonians and RG flows , JHEP 08 (2018) 120, [ arXiv:1803.10793]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Henkel, Schrodinger invariance in strongly anisotropic critical systems , J

    M. Henkel, Schrodinger invariance in strongly anisotropic critical systems , J. Statist. Phys. 75 (1994) 1023–1061, [ hep-th/9310081]

    1994 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Henkel and J

    M. Henkel and J. Unterberger, Schrodinger invariance and space-time symmetries , Nucl. Phys. B 660 (2003) 407–435, [ hep-th/0302187]. – 71 –

    2003 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Henkel and J

    M. Henkel and J. Unterberger, Supersymmetric extensions of Schrodinger-invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 746 (2006) 155–201, [ math-ph/0512024]

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Duval, M

    C. Duval, M. Henkel, P. Horvathy, S. Rouhani, and P. Zhang, Schr¨ odinger Symmetry: A Historical Review, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63 (2024), no. 8 184, [ arXiv:2403.20316]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    D. T. Son and M. Wingate, General coordinate invariance and conformal invariance in nonrelativistic physics: Unitary Fermi gas , Annals Phys. 321 (2006) 197–224, [cond-mat/0509786]

    2006 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Mehen, On non-relativistic conformal field theory and trapped atoms: Virial theorems and the state-operator correspondence in three dimensions, Phys

    T. Mehen, On non-relativistic conformal field theory and trapped atoms: Virial theorems and the state-operator correspondence in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 013614, [arXiv:0712.0867]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Nishida and D

    Y. Nishida and D. T. Son, Nonrelativistic conformal field theories , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 086004, [arXiv:0706.3746]

    2007 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Bekaert, E

    X. Bekaert, E. Meunier, and S. Moroz, Symmetries and currents of the ideal and unitary Fermi gases, JHEP 02 (2012) 113, [ arXiv:1111.3656]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    S. M. Kravec and S. Pal, The Spinful Large Charge Sector of Non-Relativistic CFTs: From Phonons to Vortex Crystals , JHEP 05 (2019) 194, [ arXiv:1904.05462]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Golkar and D

    S. Golkar and D. T. Son, Operator Product Expansion and Conservation Laws in Non-Relativistic Conformal Field Theories , JHEP 12 (2014) 063, [ arXiv:1408.3629]

    2014 arXiv

  55. [63]

    W. D. Goldberger, Z. U. Khandker, and S. Prabhu, OPE convergence in non-relativistic conformal field theories, JHEP 12 (2015) 048, [ arXiv:1412.8507]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [64]

    D. T. Son, Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence: A Geometric realization of the Schrodinger symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 046003, [ arXiv:0804.3972]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    W. D. Goldberger, AdS/CFT duality for non-relativistic field theory , JHEP 03 (2009) 069, [arXiv:0806.2867]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Balasubramanian and J

    K. Balasubramanian and J. McGreevy, Gravity duals for non-relativistic CFTs , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 061601, [ arXiv:0804.4053]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Raviv-Moshe and S

    A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong, Impurities in Schr¨ odinger field theories and s-wave resonance, arXiv:2411.04040

  60. [68]

    Baiguera, Aspects of non-relativistic quantum field theories , Eur

    S. Baiguera, Aspects of non-relativistic quantum field theories , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 3 268, [ arXiv:2311.00027]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Bagchi and R

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar, Galilean Conformal Algebras and AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2009) 037, [arXiv:0902.1385]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. Burdet, H. P. Kunzle, and M. Perrin, Bargmann Structures and Newton-cartan Theory, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 1841–1853

    1985

  63. [71]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112–5128, [ hep-th/9610043]

    1997 arXiv

  64. [72]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, The Parton picture of elementary particles , Phys. Rept. 8 (1973) 75–172. – 72 –

    1973

  65. [73]

    Venugopalan, Introduction to light cone field theory and high-energy scattering , Lect

    R. Venugopalan, Introduction to light cone field theory and high-energy scattering , Lect. Notes Phys. 516 (1999) 89, [ nucl-th/9808023]

    1999 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Anand, A

    N. Anand, A. L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, Z. U. Khandker, M. T. Walters, and Y. Xin, Introduction to Lightcone Conformal Truncation: QFT Dynamics from CFT Data , arXiv:2005.13544

    2005 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Boisvert, S

    M. Boisvert, S. Fadda, J. Kulp, and R. Mohasselyazdi, To appear, arXiv:xxxx.xxxxx

  68. [76]

    M. A. B. Beg and R. C. Furlong, The Λϕ4 Theory in the Nonrelativistic Limit , Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 1370

    1985

  69. [77]

    Jackiw, Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics,

    R. Jackiw, Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics,

  70. [78]

    Bergman, Nonrelativistic field theoretic scale anomaly , Phys

    O. Bergman, Nonrelativistic field theoretic scale anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5474–5478

    1992

  71. [79]

    B. Chen, R. Liu, and Y.-f. Zheng, On higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean conformal field theories, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 5 088, [ arXiv:2112.10514]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Kulp and S

    J. Kulp and S. Pasterski, Multiparticle States for the Flat Hologram , arXiv:2501.00462

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Kachru, X

    S. Kachru, X. Liu, and M. Mulligan, Gravity duals of Lifshitz-like fixed points , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 106005, [ arXiv:0808.1725]

    2008 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Harmonic Analysis and Mean Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2019) 217, [ arXiv:1809.05111]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    El-Showk, Y

    S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, What Maxwell Theory in D <>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance , Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 578–593, [ arXiv:1101.5385]

    2011 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Gomis, Null Wilson Lines , Unpublished Notes (2010)

    J. Gomis, Null Wilson Lines , Unpublished Notes (2010)

    2010

  77. [85]

    L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, Comments on gluon scattering amplitudes via AdS/CFT , JHEP 11 (2007) 068, [ arXiv:0710.1060]

    2007 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Raj and R

    H. Raj and R. Venugopalan, QCD-Gravity double copy in Regge asymptotics: from 2→n amplitudes to radiation in shockwave collisions , in 64th Cracow School of Theoretical Physics From the UltraViolet to the InfraRed: A panorama of modern gravitational physics , 7, 2025. arXiv:2507.21252

    2025 arXiv

  79. [87]

    P. C. Aichelburg and R. U. Sexl, On the Gravitational field of a massless particle , Gen. Rel. Grav. 2 (1971) 303–312

    1971

  80. [88]

    Jackiw, D

    R. Jackiw, D. N. Kabat, and M. Ortiz, Electromagnetic fields of a massless particle and the eikonal, Phys. Lett. B 277 (1992) 148–152, [ hep-th/9112020]

    1992 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Azzurli and K

    F. Azzurli and K. Lechner, Electromagnetic fields and potentials generated by massless charged particles, Annals Phys. 349 (2014) 1, [ arXiv:1401.5721]

    2014 arXiv

  82. [90]

    A. M. Jaffe, HIGH-ENERGY BEHAVIOR IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. I. STRICTLY LOCALIZABLE FIELDS, Phys. Rev. 158 (1967) 1454–1461

    1967

  83. [91]

    Kontsevich and G

    M. Kontsevich and G. Segal, Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 72 (2021), no. 1-2 673–699, [ arXiv:2105.10161]

    2021 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Wells Jr, Hyperfunction solutions of the zero-rest-mass field equations , Communications in Mathematical Physics 78 (1981), no

    R. Wells Jr, Hyperfunction solutions of the zero-rest-mass field equations , Communications in Mathematical Physics 78 (1981), no. 4 567–600. – 73 –

    1981

  85. [93]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman, PCT, spin and statistics, and all that . Princeton University Press, 1989

    1989

  86. [94]

    Derezi´ nski and K

    J. Derezi´ nski and K. A. Meissner,Quantum Massless Field in 1+1 Dimensions , p. 107–127. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. math-ph/0408057

    2004 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Gomis, P.-S

    J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, Z. Komargodski, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg, and S. Theisen, Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds, and Spheres , JHEP 03 (2016) 022, [ arXiv:1509.08511]

    2016 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Kubo, Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems , J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 12 (1957) 570–586

    1957

  89. [97]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory . Princeton University Press, 3, 2017

    2017

  90. [98]

    Nagano and S

    L. Nagano and S. Terashima, A note on commutation relation in conformal field theory , JHEP 09 (2021) 187, [ arXiv:2101.04090]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Tung, Group theory in physics , vol

    W.-K. Tung, Group theory in physics , vol. 1. World Scientific, 1985

    1985

  92. [100]

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, Comments on operators with large spin , JHEP 11 (2007) 019, [arXiv:0708.0672]

    2007 arXiv

  93. [101]

    G. B. Folland, A course in abstract harmonic analysis . CRC press, 2016

    2016

  94. [102]

    Mack, All unitary ray representations of the conformal group SU(2,2) with positive energy , Commun

    G. Mack, All unitary ray representations of the conformal group SU(2,2) with positive energy , Commun. Math. Phys. 55 (1977) 1. – 74 –

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.